Received: 16 September 2019 | Revised: 8 December 2019 | Accepted: 27 January 2020 DOI: 10.1002/med.21661 REVIEW ARTICLE The clinical trial landscape in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis—Past, present, and future Heike J. Wobst1 | Korrie L. Mack2,3 | Dean G. Brown4 | Nicholas J. Brandon1 | James Shorter2 1Neuroscience, BioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Boston, Massachusetts Abstract 2 Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a fatal neurodegen- Perelman School of Medicine, University of erative disease marked by progressive loss of muscle func- Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania ‐ 3Merck & Co, Inc, Kenilworth, New Jersey tion. It is the most common adult onset form of motor 4Hit Discovery, Discovery Sciences, neuron disease, affecting about 16 000 people in the United BioPharmaceuticals R&D, AstraZeneca, Boston, States alone. The average survival is about 3 years. Only two Massachusetts interventional drugs, the antiglutamatergic small‐molecule Correspondence riluzole and the more recent antioxidant edaravone, have Heike J. Wobst, Jnana Therapeutics, Northern been approved for the treatment of ALS to date. Therapeutic Avenue, Boston, MA 02210. Email:
[email protected] strategies under investigation in clinical trials cover a range of different modalities and targets, and more than 70 dif- James Shorter, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Perelman School of Medicine, ferent drugs have been tested in the clinic to date. Here, we University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA summarize and classify interventional therapeutic strategies 19104. Email:
[email protected] based on their molecular targets and phenotypic effects. We also discuss possible reasons for the failure of clinical trials in Present address Heike J. Wobst, Dean G.