sign in sign up
<<
Home , Aspermia, Asthenozoospermia, Azoospermia, Azoospermia factor, Cryptorchidism, Male infertility

Journal of Clinical Medicine

Review Reproductive Chances of Men with Due to Spermatogenic Dysfunction

Caroline Kang † , Nahid Punjani † and Peter N. Schlegel *

Department of , Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10021, USA; [email protected] (C.K.); [email protected] (N.P.) * Correspondence: [email protected] † Equal contribution.

Abstract: Non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA), or lack of in the ejaculate due to spermato- genic dysfunction, is the most severe form of . Men with this form of infertility should be evaluated prior to treatment, as there are various underlying etiologies for NOA. While a significant proportion of NOA men have idiopathic spermatogenic dysfunction, known etiologies including ge- netic disorders, hormonal anomalies, structural abnormalities, or radiation treatment, and inflammation may substantively affect the prognosis for successful treatment. Despite the underlying etiology for NOA, most of these infertile men are candidates for surgical sperm retrieval and subsequent use in intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). In this review, we describe common etiologies of NOA and clinical outcomes following surgical sperm retrieval and ICSI.

Keywords: non-obstructive azoospermia; infertility; intracytoplasmic sperm injection

 

Citation: Kang, C.; Punjani, N.; 1. Introduction Schlegel, P.N. Reproductive Chances of Men with Azoospermia Due to Infertility affects up to 15% of couples worldwide, with up to 50% of cases attributable Spermatogenic Dysfunction. J. Clin. to male factor infertility [1]. In a majority of cases, the precise etiology underlying infertility Med. 2021, 10, 1400. https://doi.org/ in the male partner remains unclear. A subset of men with infertility have no sperm in 10.3390/jcm10071400 the ejaculate, known as azoospermia, which may further be classified into obstructive (OA) or non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA). The majority of cases of NOA are idiopathic, Academic Editors: Giovanni M. Colpi however some known etiologies include genetic disorders, chemotherapy or radiation, and Ettore Caroppo developmental or structural abnormalities, and hormonal imbalances (Table1). Despite the etiology underlying the spermatogenic dysfunction resulting in NOA, sperm often Received: 4 March 2021 can be surgically extracted from the testis for use in assisted reproductive technology Accepted: 26 March 2021 (ART) with varying success. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) requires only a single Published: 31 March 2021 for injection into an oocyte, and thus has improved the chances for men with NOA to conceive biological children. In this review, we discuss common etiologies for Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral NOA and the reproductive outcomes for NOA men after surgical sperm retrieval and ICSI. with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affil- Table 1. Etiologies of non-obstructive azoospermia. iations. Etiology Example Idiopathic Genetic/Chromosomal , Y- microdeletions Iatrogenic/Surgical Chemotherapy, Radiation therapy Copyright: © 2021 by the authors. Developmental/Structural /Orchidopexy, Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. , hypogonadotropic Hormonal This article is an open access article , hyperprolactinemia/prolactinoma distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons 2. Treatment of Non-Obstructive Azoospermia Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ Effective management of infertility in men with NOA requires testicular sperm re- 4.0/). trieval as well as ART in the form of ICSI. Since sperm retrieval involves finding one of

J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 1400. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10071400 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/jcm J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 1400 2 of 18

the very limited sites of sperm production within a highly dysfunctional testis of a man with NOA, it is not surprising that the approach used for sperm retrieval can substantially affect the chance of obtaining sperm for . A wide variety of approaches have been used for attempted sperm retrieval including fine needle aspiration of the testis (testicular sperm aspiration; TESA), random biopsies of testicular tissue to identify foci of sperm production (testicular sperm extraction; “conven- tional” TESE) as well as directed testicular surgical sperm retrieval using a microsurgical approach (microdissection testicular sperm extraction; microTESE or mTESE). Each of these methods were compared using a meta-analysis of published litera- ture [2]. Although a recent meta-analysis reported no difference in sperm retrieval rates when comparing conventional TESE to microTESE, it is important to note that this anal- ysis did not require comparative studies so the heterogeneous nature of NOA patients treated at different sites invalidated any meaningful comparison of surgical techniques [3]. The superiority of microTESE is not surprising, as the surgery directs sampling of testicular tissue to the largest seminiferous tubules, which are those most likely to contain sperm [4]. From a laboratory perspective, the microTESE approach is ideal, as it limits the amount of tissue that must be examined by the andrologist to identify sperm to that which is richest in sperm production. Typical search times to find sperm in isolated, dispersed testicular tissue specimens is only 3 to 5 min at experienced centers. Of note, microTESE, although an invasive surgical procedure, has less effect on testicular function than other approaches for sperm retrieval [4].

3. Causes of Non-Obstructive Azoospermia NOA occurs secondary to the disruption of within the testicular parenchyma. This disruption of sperm production is a common phenotype with various underlying etiologies. Although understanding the underlying etiology of azoospermia may help in prognosis and counseling, the precise mechanisms by which spermatogenesis is disrupted in these disorders are not well understood. Men with NOA have varying ranges of spermatogenic failure, and even in 30–60% of those with severely dysfunctional histology (i.e., Only (SCO) or maturation arrest) small foci of spermatogenesis can be observed [5]. Furthermore, many other presumed idiopathic cases of NOA are likely to be caused by genetic abnormalities that are yet to be fully delineated.

3.1. Hormonal Imbalances Men with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (HH) suffer from a lack of stimulation, resulting in failure of the testis to produce or sperm. The defect can be congenital (e.g., Kallmann syndrome, Prader-Willi syndrome) or acquired (e.g., sec- ondary to pituitary tumor or exogenous steroid administration). The resultant phenotype of these men is lack of development of secondary sexual characteristics (with prepubertal phenotype) and infertility. Importantly, because the phenotype is caused by a lack of go- nadotropin, treatment of these men with exogenous (e.g., human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) and recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH)) can result in the appropriate development of secondary sexual characteristics (i.e., pubic hair development, testis growth, development of muscle mass) and sperm [6]. Men with HH typically do not require ICSI to achieve as treatment with exogenous gonadotropins is highly effective in inducing spermatogenesis adequate to allow return of sperm to the ejaculate, which is associated with an increase in endogenous testosterone production [6]. Hyperprolactinemia, or elevated serum levels, is a rare etiology for azoosper- mia but clinically relevant. Prolactin is produced by the posterior pituitary and elevated levels can result from a prolactin-secreting adenoma (or prolactinoma) [7]. One study examining prolactin levels in infertile men observed increased prolactin levels in men with , oligozoospermia, and azoospermia [8]. Since hyperprolactinemia is typically effectively treated with medical therapy, it is rarely a cause for persistent NOA requiring surgical intervention. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 1400 3 of 18

3.2. Klinefelter Syndrome Klinefelter Syndrome (KS) is the most common sex chromosome aneuploidy in in- fertile men, with an estimated prevalence of approximately 10% in men with NOA [9]. This syndrome involves the addition of one or more extra X-chromosome(s), resulting most commonly in a 47,XXY [9–11]. KS is thought to occur secondary to chro- mosomal nondisjunction during [12,13]. Physical examination of KS men often reveals characteristic findings of tall stature, reduced testis size, reduced chest and facial hair, gynecomastia, eunuchoid appearance, wide hips, and narrow shoulders [13]. Small testis size is thought to occur due to fibrosis and hyalinization of the seminiferous tubules and is progressive through and adult development [14,15]. Rare, small foci of spermatogenesis in the testes of KS men is hypothesized to be present due to the capability of XXY stem cells to undergo spermatogenesis, or more likely, mitotic errors within the XXY population resulting in diploid cells capable of completing the remaining spermatogenic process [16].

3.3. Y-Chromosome Microdeletions One of the most common identifiable etiologies of NOA are microdeletions of the azoospermia factor (AZF) region of the , and up to 12% of men with NOA harbor AZF microdeletions [17]. There are three loci in the AZF region, which are designated AZFa, AZFb and AZFc, and each locus contains various responsible for different aspects of spermatogenesis [18–20]. Microdeletions within AZFc are the most common (up to 80%), whereas AZFa (up to 4%) and AZFb (up to 5%) are less common [21]. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is used to detect Y-chromosome microdeletions (YCMDs) as these chromosomal deletions are too small to detect by standard karyotype analysis. Current guidelines recommend testing for YCMD along with karyotype analysis in men with NOA or severe oligozoospermia (<5 million sperm/mL) [22]. Knowing the YCMD status in a man with severe infertility carries important prognostic information as the sperm retrieval rates (SRR) in men with complete AZFa and AZFb deletions is zero, whereas men with AZFc deletions can have SRR of approximately 50–60% [23].

3.4. Malignancy, Chemotherapy, and Radiation Malignancy and associated treatments such as chemotherapy and radiation are impor- tant causes of azoospermia as approximately 50% of men will be affected by cancer in their lifetime [24]. Chemotherapy targets rapidly dividing cells and testicular germ cells which are mitotically and meiotically active and are highly sensitive to these systemic agents [25]. DNA alkylating agents, as well as platinum-containing chemotherapy agents (such as cisplatin), cross-link DNA and are particularly harmful to spermatogonial stem cells and may result in permanent azoospermia [26,27]. Other chemotherapy agents, such as anthra- cyclines, antimetabolites, and topoisomerase inhibitors, typically are less gonadotoxic and result only in transient decreases in sperm count because differentiating spermatogonia, and not stem cells, are primarily affected [26]. The CED, or cyclophosphamide-equivalent dose, may be used to determine estimated alkylating agent exposure [28]. One study of adult childhood cancer survivors found that when the CED was less than 4000 mg/m2 men were normospermic, however there was substantial overlap in the CED values of normo- zoospermic, oligozoospermic, and azoospermic men [29]. Radiation therapy, on the other hand, may result in irreversible testicular damage secondary to the high radio-sensitivity of [30]. Spermatogonial stem cells are highly sensitive to radiation and are adversely impacted even at low radiation doses (0.1 Gy), with permanent azoospermia typically occurring with doses of 16–20 Gy but reportedly occurring with radiation doses as low as 4 Gy [25,31]. Recovery of spermatogenesis after chemotherapy or radiation therapy depends on the chemotherapy agent used and cumulative chemotherapy or radiation dose [31]. Importantly, as the efficacy of cancer treatments has improved, the number of sur- vivors has increased worldwide [24]. Therefore, strong recommendations from the Ameri- J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 1400 4 of 18

can Urological Association (AUA), American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), and American Society for (ASRM) have been made to counsel and refer patients for discussion of prior to initiating cancer treat- ments [32–34]. Additionally, men undergoing chemotherapy or radiation therapy should avoid pregnancy for a minimum of twelve months after completing treatment because of potentially mutagenic effects of the treatments on germ cells [34,35]. Finally, in men with persistent azoospermia after gonadotoxic chemotherapy or radiation treatment, testicular sperm extraction may be performed to harvest sperm for ART [34].

3.5. Cryptorchidism Cryptorchidism, or undescended testis, is a well-known risk factor for male infertil- ity and a common genitourinary finding. This disorder affects 1–9% of all male neonates worldwide, with approximately 3% of boys remaining cryptorchid at one year of age [36,37]. abnormalities are observed in up to 30% of men with a history of unilateral cryp- torchidism and up to 80% of men with a history of bilateral cryptorchidism [38]. Recom- mended treatment is orchidopexy, or fixation of the testis within the , and typically is performed early in life (by 18 months of age) to prevent future testicular dysfunc- tion [36,39,40]. The majority of men with a history of cryptorchidism, either unilateral or bilateral, are fertile, however some may develop azoospermia secondary to iatrogenic to the testis or testicular vasculature during orchidopexy, or baseline underlying severe spermatogenic dysfunction. For men with NOA secondary to cryptorchidism, testicular sperm extraction is generally favorable with success in the majority of these patients [41–46].

3.6. Varicocele are a common cause of infertility, found in at least 5% of men with NOA, and the most common cause of secondary infertility [47,48]. Varicoceles are dilated veins (spermatic and pampiniform plexus veins) within the and may result in subsequent testicular dysfunction [49]. Different mechanisms of testicular dysfunction in men with varicoceles have been proposed, including testicular parenchymal hyperthermia, blood-testis barrier dysfunction, and testicular hypoxia [50]. The ultimate downstream effect is the generation of and damage to testicular cells [50–52]. Damage to Sertoli, Leydig, and germ cells can result in abnormal or decreased sperm production, as well as deficient testosterone production [49,53]. Although varicoceles clearly contribute to testicular dysfunction, a varicocele is unlikely to be the primary cause of NOA since only 5–10% of men with NOA and clinical varicocele will have enough sperm return to the ejaculate after varicocele repair to avoid testicular sperm extraction [54].

3.7. Other Causes of NOA NOA may also be acquired for a wide variety of reasons including genitourinary in- fections, such as post-pubertal , or various classes of medications. Common medication categories with documented negative impacts to fertility include exogenous testosterone or other -modulating medications, psychiatric medications, and anti- hypertensive medications, which all have been documented to modulate the hormonal environment resulting in decreased or absent sperm production [55].

4. Optimization of Sperm Production Prior to Surgical Retrieval Various abnormalities, including hormonal deficiencies and testicular dysfunction, may contribute to abnormal spermatogenesis and decreased or absent sperm production. The production of sperm requires adequate levels of (serum and intratesticular) testos- terone, and the goal of optimization is to increase testosterone levels. Serum testosterone levels can be optimized prior to surgical sperm extraction by administration of hormone analogs and modulators, including gonadotropins, aromatase inhibitors (AI), and selective receptor modulators (SERM) (Table2). Unfortunately, there is no high-level evi- J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 1400 5 of 18

dence to support use of medical therapy prior to sperm retrieval, despite many anecdotal applications of medical therapy prior to attempted sperm retrieval for NOA [22]. Certainly, it is conceptually appropriate to treat low testosterone levels in men with NOA. However, retrospective data from a large series of men with NOA suggest that the benefits of treat- ment are quite limited, with men receiving medical therapy to raise testosterone levels having SRR of 51% (151/307) compared with men not receiving medical therapy prior to surgical intervention who had SRR of 61% (25/41) (p = 0.31) [56].

Table 2. Medical therapy for hormonal optimization prior to sperm retrieval.

Class Medication Name Dose AI 1 mg/day AI Letrozole 2.5 mg/day Gonadotropin hCG 1500–3000 IU 2×/week Gonadotropin rhFSH 100–1500 IU 2–3×/week SERM Clomiphene Citrate 25–50 mg/day SERM Tamoxifen 20 mg/day AI, , SERM, selective estrogen receptor modulator; rhFSH, recombinant human follicle- stimulating hormone; hCG, human chorionic gonadotropin; IU, international unit.

Medical therapy used to optimize testosterone levels aims to increase testosterone production and decrease estradiol levels. Elevated estradiol levels, typically greater than 60 pg/mL, can suppress hypothalamic gonadotropin secretion and subsequently inhibit testosterone production [6]. Testosterone-to-estradiol (T:E) ratios are normally greater than 10, and fertile men have a mean T:E ratio of approximately 15 (14.5 ± 1.2) [57,58]. Men with infertility have lower T:E ratios, with NOA men typically in the range of 7 (6.9 ± 0.6) and men with KS approximately 5 (4.4 ± 0.5) [58–60]. Gonadotropins can stimulate testos- terone production and spermatogenesis in men with low gonadotropin levels secondary to congenital or acquired disorders [60]. hCG may be used as an (LH) substitute alone or in combination with an FSH analog (recombinant human FSH (rhFSH) or human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG)) to stimulate testis growth, testosterone pro- duction, and spermatogenesis [60]. AIs, including anastrozole and letrozole, prevent the actions of aromatase, which is present in peripheral tissues, in converting testosterone to estrogen. AIs have been shown to be effective medical therapy to increase SRR in men with KS and in infertile, non-KS men with abnormal T:E ratios [61,62]. SERMs, such as clomiphene citrate and tamoxifen, provide benefits by inhibiting the negative feedback exerted on the hypothalamic-pituitary-testis (HPT) axis by estrogen. With decreased nega- tive inhibition, higher levels of LH and FSH can be achieved, resulting in increased serum testosterone levels and improved sperm production. Several studies have demonstrated positive impacts on semen parameters in infertile men taking clomiphene citrate [63,64]. Repair of clinical varicoceles has been demonstrated to improve serum testosterone levels, as well as spermatogenesis in men with oligozoospermia [48]. After varicocele repair in men with NOA, the potential improvement of spermatogenesis may result in enhanced SRR, although there is no high-level evidence to support such intervention [54].

5. Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection for NOA Prior to the advent of ICSI, men with NOA had no means for conceiving biological children. ICSI was first introduced in 1992, and three years later, in 1995, sperm retrieved from an NOA patient was used successfully with ICSI [65,66]. Since the development of ICSI, numerous studies have been performed to examine factors that may predict or be associated with increased ICSI success.

5.1. Predictors of ICSI Outcomes Limited pre-operative variables exist which predict success of SRR and ICSI. For pre- dictors of SRR, patient age, serum hormone levels, and size have been evaluated, J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 1400 6 of 18

however, conclusive evidence is lacking that any of these factors is predictive of successful sperm retrieval [67–69]. Testicular histopathology does provide some prognostic informa- tion for SRR, but it is not routinely recommended for diagnosis of NOA, as the diagnosis can be made clinically based on FSH > 7.6 and testis length < 4.5 cm in about 90% of men with this condition [22,68,70,71]. Similarly, no clinical or biochemical factors have been found to be predictive of ICSI outcomes [3]. Additionally, testis histology has not been shown to significantly influence clinical outcomes after ICSI [71]. There may, however, be an association of the number of sperm found at time of surgical retrieval with the num- ber of clinical [72]. Further work is needed to determine if any preoperative factors, in conjunction with female factors, can predict ICSI outcomes.

5.2. ICSI Outcomes in NOA Men Understanding clinical outcomes after ICSI are important when counseling men with NOA and their partners prior to surgical sperm retrieval. A study derived from the National Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance System (NASS) found that men with infertility (including non-azoospermic and azoospermic men) had a clinical (CPR) of 48% and live birth rate (LBR) of 40%, which was similar to rates in men with no infertility (CPR 44.9%, LBR 36.5%) [73]. A clear limitation of this study was that the various etiologies of were not specified or separately examined and thus, the CPR and LBR may not hold true for all etiologies of NOA. Although NOA men represent the most severe phenotype of those with male infertility, the majority of studies, similar to that previously described, have pooled men with NOA regardless of etiology which limits the overall generalizability of the data. A comprehensive summary of SRR, biochemical pregnancy rate (BCPR), CPR, and LBR from studies investigating ICSI outcomes between 1997 and 2020 in NOA men is presented in Table3.

Table 3. Studies reporting intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes in men with non-obstructive azoospermia.

Sperm (BCPR (%)) Study Year NOA Etiology SRR (%) LBR (%) MR (%) Retrieval CPR (%) Fahmy et al. (16.6) 1997 NR cTESE NR NR NR [74] 19.2 Friedler et al. TESA 1997 NR 43.0 29.0 NR NR [75] TESE Ben-Yosef 1999 NR TESE * 60.0 21.7–27 13.0–25.0 6.7–8.7 et al. [76] Palermo 1999 NR mTESE 63.9 49.1 NR 12.5 et al. [77] Mercan et al. TESA 2000 NR 64.4 29–46 NR 20.7–24.2 [78] TESE Chan et al. cTESE (44.5) 2001 Chemotherapy 45.0 22.2 NR [79] mTESE 33.3 Damani 2002 Chemotherapy cTESE 65.2 60.0 53.0 NR et al. [80] Friedler et al. 2002 NR cTESE 39.0–85.0 16.0–19.0 67.0–80.0 NR [81] Mátyás et al. 2002 NR cTESE 69.6 26.7 NR NR [82] Bailly et al. 2003 NR cTESE 35.0 18.0 81.8 9.0 [83] J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 1400 7 of 18

Table 3. Cont.

Sperm (BCPR (%)) Study Year NOA Etiology SRR (%) LBR (%) MR (%) Retrieval CPR (%) Mansour 2003 NR cTESE 56.1 13.6–24.1 NR NR et al. [84] Meseguer 2003 Chemotherapy cTESE 41.7 20.0 20.0 NR et al. [85] Osmanagaoglu 2003 NR TESE * NR NR 13.9 NR et al. [86] Raman cTESE 2003 Cryptorchidism 74.0 46.0 43.0 NR et al.—a [42] mTESE Raman cTESE 2003 NR 58.0 44.0 36.0 8.1 et al.—b [42] mTESE Vernaeve NOA (excluded (20.7) 2004 cTESE 33.3% 10.9 NR et al.—a [43] cryptorchidism) 10.9 Vernaeve (28.1) 2004 Cryptorchidism cTESE 51.9 17.2 NR et al.—b [43] 17.2 Cryptorchidism, idiopathic, nontestis Aydos et al. cancer, RT, trauma, 2005 mTESE 57.0 36.0 NR NR [87] mumps, orchitis, chromosome anomaly Giorgetti 2005 NR cTESE 46.0 35.3 25.0–29.0 NR et al. [88] Mitchell 2005 NR cTESE N/A 8.7–26.7 17.4–33.3 NR et al. [89] Wu et al. 2005 NR cTESE 76.7 33.3–62.5 33.3–41.7 0–20.8 [90] Everaert MESA (13.2) 2006 NR 35.4 7.5 NR et al. [91] mTESE 9.4 Hibi et al. 2007 Chemotherapy mTESE 60.0 NR 40.0 NR [92] Mitchell 2007 NR cTESE N/A 26.0 13.3 NR et al. [93] Kanto et al. 2009 NR mTESE 42.5 52.9 NR NR [94] Ravizzini (50.0) 2008 NR mTESE 57.1 40.0 NR et al. [95] 40.0 Ishikawa (36.8) 2009 NR mTESE N/A 26.5 NR et al. [96] 30.9 Wiser et al. 2009 Cryptorchidism cTESE 59.5 30.8–41.2 75.0–80.0 NR [44] Yarali (41.0) 2009 non-KS mTESE 44.0 26.0 NR et al.—a [97] 33.0 Yarali (61.0) 2009 KS mTESE 56.0 28.0 NR et al.—b [97] 39.0 J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 1400 8 of 18

Table 3. Cont.

Sperm (BCPR (%)) Study Year NOA Etiology SRR (%) LBR (%) MR (%) Retrieval CPR (%) Cryptorchidism, KS, YCMD, Y inversion, Boitrelle 7.9 2011 malignancy, cTESE 53.2 42.7 37.0 et al. [98] 5.3 € idiopathic chemotherapy/RT Hauser et al. NOA + (19.1–42.9) 2011 cTESE N/A 12.8–42.9 NR [99] cryptozoospermia 12.8–42.9 Hsiao et al. 2011 Chemotherapy mTESE 37.0 50.0 42.0 NR [100] Ashraf et al. 2013 NR mTESE 50.0 40.0 NR NR [101] Choi NOA + AZFc et al.—a 2013 cTESE 21.0 NR 19.5 NR YCMD [102] Choi et al.—b 2013 AZFc YCMD cTESE 26.6 NR 24.3 NR [102] Karacan 2013 NR mTESE 54.9 31.3 28.9 7.6 et al. [103] Familial and Arafa et al. 2014 non-familial mTESE 37.4 13.9 NR NR [104] idiopathic NOA Esteves et al. 2014 NR mTESE 41.4 27.8 19.9 28.6 [105] Karacan 2014 NR mTESE 48.9 16.6–30.7 16.6–28.2 8.3 et al. [106] Aydin et al. 2015 NR mTESE 58.6 44.6 NR NR [107] Tsai et al. 2015 Cryptorchidism TESE * N/A 45.6 32.9 6.3 [45] Vloeberghs (27.7–34) 2015 NR cTESE 40.5 20.6–25.3 NR et al. [108] 21.7–26.7 Ko et al. cTESE (37.5) 2016 NR 44.9 25.0 NR [109] mTESE 30 Alfano et al. 2017 Idiopathic NOA mTESE 48.9 21.7 13.0 NR [110] Arafa Idiopathic NOA + et al.—a 2018 TESE * 63.2 25.7 NR NR AZFc YCMD [111] Arafa et al.—b 2018 Idiopathic NOA TESE * 65.8 26.6 NR NR [111] Yu et al. (34.3) 2018 NR mTESE 38.4 24.6 20.7 [112] 49.1 J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 1400 9 of 18

Table 3. Cont.

Sperm (BCPR (%)) Study Year NOA Etiology SRR (%) LBR (%) MR (%) Retrieval CPR (%) Idiopathic, KS, YCMD, Chen et al. 2019 cryptorchidism, mTESE 40.3 51.0–55.8 NR NR [41] mumps orchitis, chemotherapy Yamaguchi NOA (excluded et al.—a 2020 mTESE 74.0 28.9 NR 20.2 AZFc YCMD) [113] Yamaguchi et al.—b 2020 AZFc YCMD mTESE 20.4 24.7 NR 26.3 [113] AZFRc, azoospermia factor region deletion in locus c; SRR, sperm retrieval rate; BCPR, biochemical pregnancy rate (elevated serum hCG); CPR, clinical pregnancy rate (heartbeat or gestational sac detectable by ultrasound); LBR, live birth rate; MR, miscarriage rate; NOA, non-obstructive azoospermia; NR, not reported; TESA, testicular sperm aspiration; cTESE, conventional TESE; mTESE, microdissection TESE; TESE *—type of TESE not specified; €, ectopic pregnancy rate; KS, Klinefelter syndrome; YCMD, Y-chromosome microdeletion; RT, radiation therapy; MESA, microsurgical epiddiymal sperm aspiration. “a” and “b” were used to denote different patient cohorts examined within one study.

A recent meta-analysis examining sperm retrieval as well as pregnancy and LBRs was performed [3]. This review compared SRR after conventional TESE (cTESE) with that after microTESE, and found that the per procedure SRR was 45–49%, and was not able to identify differences between conventional or microsurgical methods of sperm retrieval because the included studies did not include comparator trials [3]. Meta-regression analysis further demonstrated that SRR was independent of both age and hormonal parameters [3]. Testis volume greater than 12.5 mL was found to be associated with a greater than 60% chance of successful sperm retrieval with an accuracy of 86.2% [3]. The BCPR (diagnosed by positive serum hCG in the female partner) was 25–32% per ICSI cycle, and LBR was 20–28% [3]. It is important to note that the patient cohorts included in this meta-analysis were heterogenous with varying NOA etiologies, making the comparison of outcomes between cTESE and mTESE less valid. A previous meta-analysis which included fifteen comparative studies demonstrated a 17% higher likelihood of sperm retrieval success when performing mTESE compared to cTESE [2]. Additionally, it was noted that men who underwent mTESE had failed prior cTESE or TESA, which also may have underestimated the increase in sperm retrieval rate with mTESE [2]. Several, smaller studies have been performed examining NOA men based on underlying etiology, including KS, YCMD, malignancy, and cryptorchidism, and these will be discussed further.

5.2.1. Klinefelter Syndrome A meta-analysis of 37 studies found a cumulative SRR of 44% (39–48%) per TESE procedure in KS patients, with no significant difference between cTESE and mTESE [114]. ICSI outcomes were available for 29 of the 37 studies in the meta-analysis, and reported a cumulative CPR, defined by ultrasound detection of a gestational sac or heartbeat, of 43% (36–50%), and LBR of 43% (34–53%) per ICSI cycle [114]. SRR, CPR, and LBR in this analysis were independent of patient age at time of retrieval as well as testis volume, and serum hormone parameters [114]. Additionally, no differences between use of fresh versus frozen sperm were observed [114]. Again, it is important to note that this meta-analysis examined studies where the patient cohorts were not entirely made up of KS patients. In one of the largest published studies on SRR in KS patients, we report a SRR of 66% (Table4)[ 61]. In our experience with KS patients, the appearance of tubules within the testis is unique amongst men with NOA. Instead of typically having sperm production throughout an individual , KS patients tend to have focal enlargement of otherwise sclerotic tubules within the testes. This appearance requires an intensive search within J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 1400 10 of 18

these typically very atrophic testes to find the millimeter-sized segments of tubules that may contain sperm. In addition, the number of sperm retrieved tends to be so small that sperm are typically not able to be frozen for later use. Therefore, the numbers of sperm obtained may be only adequate to inject available oocytes during a programmed, fresh in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle.

Table 4. Sperm retrieval rates in non-obstructive azoospermia by etiology.

Weill Cornell Medicine NOA Etiology Other Reports (P.N.S.) Idiopathic 48.5% [46] 37.4–65.8% [104,111] Klinefelter syndrome 61–66% [46,61] 44% [114] YCMD (AZFc) 67–75% [17,46] 20.4–54.8% [102,113,115] Chemotherapy 42% [46] 37–60% [79,92,100] Cryptorchidism 62% [46] 52–85% [41–45] Overall 48% [46] 45–49% [3] P.N.S., Peter N. Schlegel, attending urologist at Weill Cornell Medicine.

5.2.2. Y-Chromosome Microdeletions Little is known regarding ICSI and clinical outcomes in NOA men with YCMD given that many of these studies excluded men with YCMD or included men with YCMD in a larger cohort of azoospermic men (Tables3 and4). SRRs differ drastically depending on the site of microdeletion. Sperm can be surgically retrieved in up to 70% of men with AZFc deletions and a subset may have low concentrations of sperm in the ejaculate, whereas no reports of sperm retrieval in men with complete AZFa or AZFb deletions have been effectively documented [17,116]. One study examining ICSI outcomes using ejaculated sperm demonstrated no significant difference in pregnancy, live birth, and miscarriage rates in men with AZFc microdeletions compared to those with other sources of infertility and no evidence of YCMD [117]. Another study found that men with AZFc microdeletions had a significantly increased fertilization rate when ejaculated sperm was used compared to testicular sperm [118]. With ejaculated sperm, pregnancy rate was 47% compared to 14% with testicular sperm [118]. Unfortunately, no predictors of successful sperm retrieval have been identified in this cohort, and it is important to inform couples that any male offspring will harbor the same Y-chromosome [118,119].

5.2.3. Chemotherapy-Associated NOA In men treated with chemotherapy, SRR ranges from 37 to 60%, pregnancy rates 33–50%, and LBR 22–42% (Tables3 and4)[ 79,92,100]. Additional studies have been per- formed examining SRRs and ICSI outcomes, but men treated for malignancy (either with chemotherapy or radiation) are often pooled with men who have NOA due to other un- derlying etiologies. Therefore, the reported clinical outcomes may not be accurate for men with azoospermia solely secondary to chemotherapy or radiation treatment. One retro- spective study of male cancer survivors found that following chemotherapy or radiation treatment, approximately 57% were azoospermic [120]. This percentage is higher than expected in a full cohort of men treated with chemotherapy, as it reflects a referral bias to an infertility center for selected cancer survivors. The CPR was 38.6% and the LBR was 30.5% after ICSI [120]. Overall, SRR and ICSI outcomes are generally favorable for men who have undergone treatment for malignancy. In testis cancer survivors, 3% (who received chemotherapy) and 6% (who received radiation therapy) remained azoospermic two years after therapy [121]. With increasingly aggressive chemotherapy treatment regi- mens, the rates of persistent azoospermia are higher [122]. However, fertility preservation prior to cancer treatment is still highly recommended as it is minimally invasive for men and can potentially portend less invasive treatments for the female partner [22]. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 1400 11 of 18

5.2.4. Cryptorchidism The mechanism underlying infertility in males with a history of cryptorchidism is not well understood. Men with bilateral cryptorchidism have a higher risk of infertility compared with those who have unilateral cryptorchidism [38,39,123]. Additionally, age at orchidopexy also affects sperm production and future fertility [40]. It is estimated that greater than 50% of men with a history of cryptorchidism will have varying degrees of spermatogenic failure and may require surgical sperm retrieval to conceive biological children [39,123]. Men who have had prior orchidopexy typically have substantial peri-testicular scar, no tunica vaginalis, and often have an abnormal lie or position of the testis with an anterior . Surgical treatment in these men also often reveals an atypical blood supply to the testis with variable patterns of vessels on the tunica albuginea. Within the testis, most tubules are typically sclerotic with distinctively different tubules containing isolated foci of spermatogenesis visible during microdissection. Studies examining ICSI outcomes solely in men with a history of cryptorchidism report SRR ranging from 52 to 85%, pregnancy rates ranging from 10–46%, LBR ranging from 33–100%, and miscarriage rates ranging from 6.3–8.1% (Tables2 and3)[ 41–45]. Patients with cryptorchidism have a wide range of fertility potential and more studies of these individuals is needed to determine the mechanisms underlying their infertility so that patients can be counseled with accurate prognostic information.

5.3. Sperm Effects on ICSI Outcomes For men with severely impaired sperm production, development appears to be adversely affected by the (testicular) source of sperm and level of sperm production with decreased development associated with higher FSH levels [124,125]. Men with NOA often have such low fertilization rates that a limited number of exist on day 3. Therefore, transfer of day 3 embryos is routinely required, as further in vitro culture risks losing the embryos available for transfer on day 3. Of note, high-quality day 3 embryos have been suggested in some studies to be equivalent to day 5 blastocysts in terms of pregnancy and live birth rate [124]. However, existing data are limited with no interpretable data on embryo morphokinetic parameters, although some publications suggest that embryo development may be less efficient in me with lower sperm production [124,126]. Similarly, there are limited published data on blastocyst euploidy rates. Given the frequency of day 3 for couples where men have NOA, data obtained from the select group with blastocysts available for transfer may not reflect results that are generalizable for NOA patients as a whole. Advances in the understanding of sperm biology have revealed important paternal effects on embryo development and quality. Poor semen parameters have been demon- strated to negatively affect blastocyst formation rates after IVF and ICSI [124,126–129]. Ejaculated sperm has been found to produce higher fertilization and pregnancy rates than testicular sperm [130]. Additionally, when compared to men with obstructive azoosper- mia undergoing ICSI, men with NOA undergoing ICSI have lower rates of fertilization, blastocyst formation, implantation, and pregnancy [124,126,131,132].

6. Improving ICSI Outcomes from the Male Perspective Optimization of hormone levels in NOA men may improve SRR [71]. Increased numbers of sperm may allow selection of more optimal sperm to be used for ICSI. Currently, various methods exist for improving sperm selection, including viability assays, cell sorting methods and enhanced microscopic analysis for selection of sperm for ICSI, although manual selection of individual sperm is the most common approach used in men with NOA [133]. Conventional sperm selection methods including the swim-up method, migration density, and density gradients rely heavily on the motility of sperm, and cannot be used for sperm retrieved from the testis as certain maturation processes have not occurred in J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 1400 12 of 18

testicular sperm and these sperm are immotile. Magnetic activated cell sorting (MACS) is a method of sperm selection using annexin V-conjugated magnetic beads to isolate viable sperm. A systematic review analyzing five prospective, randomized trials evaluating MACS compared to standard sperm selection methods (including swim-up and density gradient methods) found significantly increased pregnancy rates resulted after MACS [134]. Intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection (IMSI) is the process of selecting sperm at x6,600 magnification to examine motile sperm organellar morphology [133]. A prospective, randomized study examining ICSI and IMSI in couples with severe male factor infertility reported higher CPR with IMSI (39.2% IMSI vs. 26.5% ICSI, p = 0.004) [135]. This study along with other studies, including one meta-analysis, also demonstrated a decreased miscarriage rate and improved implantation rates with IMSI compared with ICSI [133,135]. However, a recent Cochrane review of the efficacy of IMSI compared with traditional ICSI did not provide any conclusive evidence to suggest that IMSI is superior to ICSI in terms of clinical outcomes (CPR, LBR) [136]. Additional work on novel techniques is underway that will further optimize the sperm chosen for oocyte injection. One promising technique is microfluidic sorting of sperm, which allows for analysis of sperm count, motility, and morphology on a microscopic level, allowing for the identification and selection of sperm with the best qualities [137,138]. Studies examining microfluidics-sorted sperm have demonstrated improved ICSI and clinical outcomes compared to sperm selected by conventional methods [138,139]. How- ever, further work is needed to fully develop this technology for mainstream use [140]. Given the limited numbers of sperm available for retrieval from men with NOA, it is more challenging to apply sperm selection techniques that could be used for sperm samples from men with oligozoospermia.

7. Conclusions ICSI has permitted NOA men, who were previously unable, to conceive biological children. Studies have demonstrated varying rates of clinical (pregnancy and live birth rates) outcomes likely due to a heterogenous population of men with NOA included in these studies, and future studies would benefit from etiology-specific outcome reporting. Understanding clinical outcomes after ICSI is important for prognostic information and counseling of these NOA men and their partners prior to undergoing invasive surgical procedures. Further work is needed to delineate the molecular mechanisms and genetic defects that underlie this severe reproductive phenotype.

Author Contributions: Conceptualization P.N.S.; writing—C.K., N.P., and P.N.S.; review and editing— C.K., N.P., and P.N.S.; supervision P.N.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. Funding: C.K. and N.P. are supported in part by the Frederick J. and Theresa Dow Wallace Fund of the New York Community Trust. Data Availability Statement: Not applicable. Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

References 1. Leifke, E.; Nieschlag, E. Male infertility treatment in the light of evidence-based medicine. Andrologia 1996, 28, 23–30. [PubMed] 2. Bernie, A.M.; Mata, D.A.; Ramasamy, R.; Schlegel, P.N. Comparison of microdissection testicular sperm extraction, conventional testicular sperm extraction, and testicular sperm aspiration for nonobstructive azoospermia: A systematic review and meta- analysis. Fertil. Steril. 2015, 104, 1099–1103.e3. [CrossRef][PubMed] 3. Corona, G.; Minhas, S.; Giwercman, A.; Bettocchi, C.; Dinkelman-Smit, M.; Dohle, G.; Fusco, F.; Kadioglou, A.; Kliesch, S.; Kopa, Z.; et al. Sperm recovery and ICSI outcomes in men with non-obstructive azoospermia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum. Reprod. Update 2019, 25, 733–757. [CrossRef] 4. Schlegel, P.N. Testicular sperm extraction: Microdissection improves sperm yield with minimal tissue excision. Hum. Reprod. 1999, 14, 131–135. [CrossRef][PubMed] 5. Esteves, S.C. Clinical management of infertile men with nonobstructive azoospermia. Asian J. Androl. 2015, 17, 459–470. [CrossRef] J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 1400 13 of 18

6. Kumar, R. Medical management of non-obstructive azoospermia. Clinics 2013, 68, 75–79. [CrossRef] 7. Romijn, J.A. Hyperprolactinemia and prolactinoma. Handb. Clin. Neurol. 2014, 124, 185–195. [CrossRef] 8. Merino, G.; Carranza-Lira, S.; Martinez-Chéquer, J.C.; Barahona, E.; Morán, C.; Bermúdez, J.A. Hyperprolactinemia in men with asthenozoospermia, oligozoospermia, or azoospermia. Arch. Androl. 1997, 38, 201–206. [CrossRef] 9. Stahl, P.J.; Schlegel, P.N. Genetic evaluation of the azoospermic or severely oligozoospermic male. Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol. 2012, 24, 221–228. [CrossRef] 10. Suganya, J.; Kujur, S.B.; Selvaraj, K.; Suruli, M.S.; Haripriya, G.; Samuel, C.R. Chromosomal Abnormalities in Infertile Men from Southern India. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 2015, 9, GC05-10. [CrossRef] 11. Abramsky, L.; Chapple, J. 47,XXY (Klinefelter syndrome) and 47,XYY: Estimated rates of and indication for postnatal diagnosis with implications for prenatal counselling. Prenat. Diagn. 1997, 17, 363–368. [CrossRef] 12. Maduro, M.R.; Lamb, D.J. Understanding new genetics of male infertility. J. Urol. 2002, 168, 2197–2205. [CrossRef] 13. Bonomi, M.; Rochira, V.; Pasquali, D.; Balercia, G.; Jannini, E.A.; Ferlin, A.; Klinefelter Italia, N.G. Klinefelter syndrome (KS): Genetics, clinical phenotype and hypogonadism. J. Endocrinol. Investig. 2017, 40, 123–134. [CrossRef][PubMed] 14. Lanfranco, F.; Kamischke, A.; Zitzmann, M.; Nieschlag, E. Klinefelter’s syndrome. Lancet 2004, 364, 273–283. [CrossRef] 15. Aksglaede, L.; Wikstrom, A.M.; Rajpert-De Meyts, E.; Dunkel, L.; Skakkebaek, N.E.; Juul, A. Natural history of seminiferous tubule degeneration in Klinefelter syndrome. Hum. Reprod. Update 2006, 12, 39–48. [CrossRef] 16. Fainberg, J.; Hayden, R.P.; Schlegel, P.N. Fertility management of Klinefelter syndrome. Expert Rev. Endocrinol. Metab 2019, 14, 369–380. [CrossRef] 17. Hopps, C.V.; Mielnik, A.; Goldstein, M.; Palermo, G.D.; Rosenwaks, Z.; Schlegel, P.N. Detection of sperm in men with Y chromosome microdeletions of the AZFa, AZFb and AZFc regions. Hum. Reprod. 2003, 18, 1660–1665. [CrossRef] 18. Vogt, P.H.; Edelmann, A.; Kirsch, S.; Henegariu, O.; Hirschmann, P.; Kiesewetter, F.; Kohn, F.M.; Schill, W.B.; Farah, S.; Ramos, C.; et al. Human Y chromosome azoospermia factors (AZF) mapped to different subregions in Yq11. Hum. Mol. Genet. 1996, 5, 933–943. [CrossRef] 19. Vogt, P.H. AZF deletions and Y chromosomal haplogroups: History and update based on sequence. Hum. Reprod. Update 2005, 11, 319–336. [CrossRef] 20. Colaco, S.; Modi, D. Genetics of the human Y chromosome and its association with male infertility. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2018, 16, 14. [CrossRef] 21. Bansal, S.K.; Jaiswal, D.; Gupta, N.; Singh, K.; Dada, R.; Sankhwar, S.N.; Gupta, G.; Rajender, S. Gr/gr deletions on Y-chromosome correlate with male infertility: An original study, meta-analyses, and trial sequential analyses. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 19798. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 22. Schlegel, P.N.; Sigman, M.; Collura, B.; De Jonge, C.J.; Eisenberg, M.L.; Lamb, D.J.; Mulhall, J.P.; Niederberger, C.; Sandlow, J.I.; Sokol, R.Z.; et al. Diagnosis and Treatment of Infertility in Men: AUA/ASRM Guideline Part I. J. Urol. 2021, 205, 36–43. [CrossRef][PubMed] 23. Georgiou, I.; Syrrou, M.; Pardalidis, N.; Karakitsios, K.; Mantzavinos, T.; Giotitsas, N.; Loutradis, D.; Dimitriadis, F.; Saito, M.; Miyagawa, I.; et al. Genetic and epigenetic risks of intracytoplasmic sperm injection method. Asian J. Androl. 2006, 8, 643–673. [CrossRef] 24. Osterberg, E.C.; Ramasamy, R.; Masson, P.; Brannigan, R.E. Current practices in fertility preservation in male cancer patients. Urol. Ann. 2014, 6, 13–17. [CrossRef][PubMed] 25. Howell, S.J.; Radford, J.A.; Ryder, W.D.; Shalet, S.M. Testicular function after cytotoxic chemotherapy: Evidence of insufficiency. J. Clin. Oncol. 1999, 17, 1493–1498. [CrossRef][PubMed] 26. Meistrich, M.L. Effects of chemotherapy and radiotherapy on spermatogenesis in humans. Fertil. Steril. 2013, 100, 1180–1186. [CrossRef][PubMed] 27. Dasari, S.; Tchounwou, P.B. Cisplatin in cancer therapy: Molecular mechanisms of action. Eur. J. Pharmacol 2014, 740, 364–378. [CrossRef][PubMed] 28. Green, D.M.; Nolan, V.G.; Goodman, P.J.; Whitton, J.A.; Srivastava, D.; Leisenring, W.M.; Neglia, J.P.; Sklar, C.A.; Kaste, S.C.; Hudson, M.M.; et al. The cyclophosphamide equivalent dose as an approach for quantifying alkylating agent exposure: A report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. Pediatr. Blood Cancer 2014, 61, 53–67. [CrossRef] 29. Green, D.M.; Liu, W.; Kutteh, W.H.; Ke, R.W.; Shelton, K.C.; Sklar, C.A.; Chemaitilly, W.; Pui, C.H.; Klosky, J.L.; Spunt, S.L.; et al. Cumulative alkylating agent exposure and semen parameters in adult survivors of childhood cancer: A report from the St Jude Lifetime Cohort Study. Lancet Oncol. 2014, 15, 1215–1223. [CrossRef] 30. Okada, K.; Fujisawa, M. Recovery of Spermatogenesis Following Cancer Treatment with Cytotoxic Chemotherapy and Radiother- apy. World J. Mens Health 2019, 37, 166–174. [CrossRef] 31. Dohle, G.R. Male infertility in cancer patients: Review of the literature. Int. J. Urol. 2010, 17, 327–331. [CrossRef][PubMed] 32. Loren, A.W.; Mangu, P.B.; Beck, L.N.; Brennan, L.; Magdalinski, A.J.; Partridge, A.H.; Quinn, G.; Wallace, W.H.; Oktay, K.; American Society of Clinical, O. Fertility preservation for patients with cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J. Clin. Oncol. 2013, 31, 2500–2510. [CrossRef][PubMed] 33. Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Fertility preservation and reproduction in patients facing gonadotoxic therapies: An Ethics Committee opinion. Fertil. Steril. 2018, 110, 380–386. [CrossRef][PubMed] J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 1400 14 of 18

34. Schlegel, P.N.; Sigman, M.; Collura, B.; De Jonge, C.J.; Eisenberg, M.L.; Lamb, D.J.; Mulhall, J.P.; Niederberger, C.; Sandlow, J.I.; Sokol, R.Z.; et al. Diagnosis and Treatment of Infertility in Men: AUA/ASRM Guideline PART II. J. Urol. 2021, 205, 44–51. [CrossRef][PubMed] 35. Meistrich, M.L. Risks of genetic damage in offspring conceived using spermatozoa produced during chemotherapy or radiother- apy. 2020, 8, 545–558. [CrossRef][PubMed] 36. Gurney, J.K.; McGlynn, K.A.; Stanley, J.; Merriman, T.; Signal, V.; Shaw, C.; Edwards, R.; Richiardi, L.; Hutson, J.; Sarfati, D. Risk factors for cryptorchidism. Nat. Rev. Urol. 2017, 14, 534–548. [CrossRef] 37. Cortes, D. Cryptorchidism–aspects of pathogenesis, histology and treatment. Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol. Suppl. 1998, 196, 1–54. [PubMed] 38. Hanson, B.M.; Eisenberg, M.L.; Hotaling, J.M. Male infertility: A biomarker of individual and familial cancer risk. Fertil. Steril. 2018, 109, 6–19. [CrossRef] 39. Cobellis, G.; Noviello, C.; Nino, F.; Romano, M.; Mariscoli, F.; Martino, A.; Parmeggiani, P.; Papparella, A. Spermatogenesis and cryptorchidism. Front. Endocrinol. 2014, 5, 63. [CrossRef] 40. Rodprasert, W.; Virtanen, H.E.; Mäkelä, J.A.; Toppari, J. Hypogonadism and Cryptorchidism. Front. Endocrinol. 2019, 10, 906. [CrossRef][PubMed] 41. Chen, X.; Ma, Y.; Zou, S.; Wang, S.; Qiu, J.; Xiao, Q.; Zhou, L.; Ping, P. Comparison and outcomes of nonobstructive azoospermia patients with different etiology undergoing MicroTESE and ICSI treatments. Transl. Androl. Urol. 2019, 8, 366–373. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 42. Raman, J.D.; Schlegel, P.N. Testicular sperm extraction with intracytoplasmic sperm injection is successful for the treatment of nonobstructive azoospermia associated with cryptorchidism. J. Urol. 2003, 170, 1287–1290. [CrossRef][PubMed] 43. Vernaeve, V.; Krikilion, A.; Verheyen, G.; Van Steirteghem, A.; Devroey, P.; Tournaye, H. Outcome of testicular sperm recovery and ICSI in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia with a history of orchidopexy. Hum. Reprod. 2004, 19, 2307–2312. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 44. Wiser, A.; Raviv, G.; Weissenberg, R.; Elizur, S.E.; Levron, J.; Machtinger, R.; Madgar, I. Does age at orchidopexy impact on the results of testicular sperm extraction? Reprod. Biomed. Online 2009, 19, 778–783. [CrossRef] 45. Tsai, Y.R.; Huang, F.J.; Lin, P.Y.; Kung, F.T.; Lin, Y.J.; Lan, K.C. Clinical outcomes and development of children born to couples with obstructive and nonobstructive azoospermia undergoing testicular sperm extraction-intracytoplasmic sperm injection: A comparative study. Taiwan J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2015, 54, 155–159. [CrossRef][PubMed] 46. Dabaja, A.A.; Schlegel, P.N. Microdissection testicular sperm extraction: An update. Asian J. Androl. 2013, 15, 35–39. [CrossRef] 47. Gorelick, J.I.; Goldstein, M. Loss of fertility in men with varicocele. Fertil. Steril. 1993, 59, 613–616. [CrossRef] 48. Esteves, S.C.; Glina, S. Recovery of spermatogenesis after microsurgical subinguinal varicocele repair in azoospermic men based on testicular histology. Int. Braz. J. Urol. 2005, 31, 541–548. [CrossRef] 49. Sedaghatpour, D.; Berookhim, B.M. The Role of Varicocele in Male Factor Subfertility. Curr. Urol. Rep. 2017, 18, 73. [CrossRef] 50. Hassanin, A.M.; Ahmed, H.H.; Kaddah, A.N. A global view of the pathophysiology of varicocele. Andrology 2018, 6, 654–661. [CrossRef] 51. Shiraishi, K.; Naito, K. Effects of 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal, a marker of , on spermatogenesis and expression of p53 protein in male infertility. J. Urol. 2007, 178, 1012–1017, discussion 1017. [CrossRef][PubMed] 52. Ogi, S.; Tanji, N.; Iseda, T.; Yokoyama, M. Expression of heat shock proteins in developing and degenerating rat testes. Arch. Androl. 1999, 43, 163–171. [CrossRef][PubMed] 53. Tanrikut, C.; Goldstein, M.; Rosoff, J.S.; Lee, R.K.; Nelson, C.J.; Mulhall, J.P. Varicocele as a risk factor for androgen deficiency and effect of repair. BJU Int. 2011, 108, 1480–1484. [CrossRef][PubMed] 54. Schlegel, P.N.; Kaufmann, J. Role of varicocelectomy in men with nonobstructive azoospermia. Fertil. Steril. 2004, 81, 1585–1588. [CrossRef][PubMed] 55. Samplaski, M.K.; Nangia, A.K. Adverse effects of common medications on male fertility. Nat. Rev. Urol. 2015, 12, 401–413. [CrossRef] 56. Reifsnyder, J.E.; Ramasamy, R.; Husseini, J.; Schlegel, P.N. Role of optimizing testosterone before microdissection testicular sperm extraction in men with nonobstructive azoospermia. J. Urol. 2012, 188, 532–536. [CrossRef][PubMed] 57. Schlegel, P.N. Aromatase inhibitors for male infertility. Fertil. Steril. 2012, 98, 1359–1362. [CrossRef] 58. Pavlovich, C.P.; King, P.; Goldstein, M.; Schlegel, P.N. Evidence of a treatable endocrinopathy in infertile men. J. Urol. 2001, 165, 837–841. [CrossRef] 59. Raman, J.D.; Schlegel, P.N. Aromatase inhibitors for male infertility. J. Urol. 2002, 167, 624–629. [CrossRef] 60. Ramasamy, R.; Stahl, P.J.; Schlegel, P.N. Medical therapy for spermatogenic failure. Asian J. Androl. 2012, 14, 57–60. [CrossRef] 61. Ramasamy, R.; Ricci, J.A.; Palermo, G.D.; Gosden, L.V.; Rosenwaks, Z.; Schlegel, P.N. Successful fertility treatment for Klinefelter’s syndrome. J. Urol. 2009, 182, 1108–1113. [CrossRef][PubMed] 62. Schiff, J.D.; Palermo, G.D.; Veeck, L.L.; Goldstein, M.; Rosenwaks, Z.; Schlegel, P.N. Success of testicular sperm extraction [corrected] and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in men with Klinefelter syndrome. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2005, 90, 6263–6267. [CrossRef][PubMed] 63. Moradi, M.; Moradi, A.; Alemi, M.; Ahmadnia, H.; Abdi, H.; Ahmadi, A.; Bazargan-Hejazi, S. Safety and efficacy of clomiphene citrate and L-carnitine in idiopathic male infertility: A comparative study. Urol. J. 2010, 7, 188–193. [PubMed] J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 1400 15 of 18

64. Roth, L.W.; Ryan, A.R.; Meacham, R.B. Clomiphene citrate in the management of male infertility. Semin. Reprod. Med. 2013, 31, 245–250. [CrossRef][PubMed] 65. Palermo, G.; Joris, H.; Devroey, P.; Van Steirteghem, A.C. Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic injection of single spermatozoon into an oocyte. Lancet 1992, 340, 17–18. [CrossRef] 66. Devroey, P.; Liu, J.; Nagy, Z.; Goossens, A.; Tournaye, H.; Camus, M.; Van Steirteghem, A.; Silber, S. Pregnancies after testicular sperm extraction and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in non-obstructive azoospermia. Hum. Reprod. 1995, 10, 1457–1460. [CrossRef] 67. Bernie, A.M.; Ramasamy, R.; Stember, D.S.; Stahl, P.J. Microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration: Indications, techniques and outcomes. Asian J. Androl. 2013, 15, 40–43. [CrossRef] 68. Kavoussi, P.K.; West, B.T.; Chen, S.H.; Hunn, C.; Gilkey, M.S.; Machen, G.L.; Kavoussi, K.M.; Esqueda, A.; Wininger, J.D.; Kavoussi, S.K. A comprehensive assessment of predictors of fertility outcomes in men with non-obstructive azoospermia undergoing microdissection testicular sperm extraction. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2020, 18, 90. [CrossRef] 69. Pavan-Jukic, D.; Stubljar, D.; Jukic, T.; Starc, A. Predictive factors for sperm retrieval from males with azoospermia who are eligible for testicular sperm extraction (TESE). Syst. Biol. Reprod. Med. 2020, 66, 70–75. [CrossRef] 70. Dohle, G.R.; Elzanaty, S.; van Casteren, N.J. Testicular biopsy: Clinical practice and interpretation. Asian J. Androl. 2012, 14, 88–93. [CrossRef] 71. Guler, I.; Erdem, M.; Erdem, A.; Demirda˘g,E.; Tunc, L.; Bozkurt, N.; Mutlu, M.F.; Oktem, M. Impact of testicular histopathology as a predictor of sperm retrieval and pregnancy outcome in patients with nonobstructive azoospermia: Correlation with clinical and hormonal factors. Andrologia 2016, 48, 765–773. [CrossRef] 72. Cavallini, G.; Cristina Magli, M.; Crippa, A.; Resta, S.; Vitali, G.; Pia Ferraretti, A.; Gianaroli, L. The number of spermatozoa collected with testicular sperm extraction is a novel predictor of intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome in non-obstructive azoospermic patients. Asian J. Androl. 2011, 13, 312–316. [CrossRef] 73. Boulet, S.L.; Mehta, A.; Kissin, D.M.; Warner, L.; Kawwass, J.F.; Jamieson, D.J. Trends in use of and reproductive outcomes associated with intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Jama 2015, 313, 255–263. [CrossRef][PubMed] 74. Fahmy, I.; Mansour, R.; Aboulghar, M.; Serour, G.; Kamal, A.; Tawab, N.A.; Ramzy, A.M.; Amin, Y. Intracytoplasmic sperm injec- tion using surgically retrieved epididymal and testicular spermatozoa in cases of obstructive and non-obstructive azoospermia. Int. J. Androl. 1997, 20, 37–44. [CrossRef][PubMed] 75. Friedler, S.; Raziel, A.; Strassburger, D.; Soffer, Y.; Komarovsky, D.; Ron-El, R. Testicular sperm retrieval by percutaneous fine needle sperm aspiration compared with testicular sperm extraction by open biopsy in men with non-obstructive azoospermia. Hum. Reprod. 1997, 12, 1488–1493. [CrossRef][PubMed] 76. Ben-Yosef, D.; Yogev, L.; Hauser, R.; Yavetz, H.; Azem, F.; Yovel, I.; Lessing, J.B.; Amit, A. Testicular sperm retrieval and prior to initiating ovarian stimulation as the first line approach in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia. Hum. Reprod. 1999, 14, 1794–1801. [CrossRef] 77. Palermo, G.D.; Schlegel, P.N.; Hariprashad, J.J.; Ergün, B.; Mielnik, A.; Zaninovic, N.; Veeck, L.L.; Rosenwaks, Z. Fertilization and pregnancy outcome with intracytoplasmic sperm injection for azoospermic men. Hum. Reprod. 1999, 14, 741–748. [CrossRef] 78. Mercan, R.; Urman, B.; Alatas, C.; Aksoy, S.; Nuhoglu, A.; Isiklar, A.; Balaban, B. Outcome of testicular sperm retrieval procedures in non-obstructive azoospermia: Percutaneous aspiration versus open biopsy. Hum. Reprod. 2000, 15, 1548–1551. [CrossRef] 79. Chan, P.T.; Palermo, G.D.; Veeck, L.L.; Rosenwaks, Z.; Schlegel, P.N. Testicular sperm extraction combined with intracytoplasmic sperm injection in the treatment of men with persistent azoospermia postchemotherapy. Cancer 2001, 92, 1632–1637. [CrossRef] 80. Damani, M.N.; Master, V.; Meng, M.V.; Burgess, C.; Turek, P.; Oates, R.D. Postchemotherapy ejaculatory azoospermia: Fatherhood with sperm from testis tissue with intracytoplasmic sperm injection. J. Clin. Oncol. 2002, 20, 930–936. [CrossRef] 81. Friedler, S.; Raziel, A.; Schachter, M.; Strassburger, D.; Bern, O.; Ron-El, R. Outcome of first and repeated testicular sperm extraction and ICSI in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia. Hum. Reprod. 2002, 17, 2356–2361. [CrossRef][PubMed] 82. Mátyás, S.; Rajczy, K.; Papp, G.; Bernard, A.; Korponai, E.; Kovács, T.; Krizsa, F.; Kulin, S.; Menyhárt, R.; Szmatona, G.; et al. Five years experiences with microinjection of testicular spermatozoa into oocytes in Hungary. Andrologia 2002, 34, 248–254. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 83. Bailly, M.; Guthauser, B.; Bergere, M.; Wainer, R.; Lombroso, R.; Ville, Y.; Selva, J. Effects of low concentrations of inhibin B on the outcomes of testicular sperm extraction and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil. Steril. 2003, 79, 905–908. [CrossRef] 84. Mansour, R.T.; Fahmy, I.M.; Taha, A.K.; Tawab, N.A.; Serour, G.I.; Aboulghar, M.A. Intracytoplasmic spermatid injection can result in the delivery of normal offspring. J. Androl. 2003, 24, 757–764. [CrossRef][PubMed] 85. Meseguer, M.; Garrido, N.; Remohí, J.; Pellicer, A.; Simón, C.; Martínez-Jabaloyas, J.M.; Gil-Salom, M. Testicular sperm extraction (TESE) and ICSI in patients with permanent azoospermia after chemotherapy. Hum. Reprod. 2003, 18, 1281–1285. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 86. Osmanagaoglu, K.; Vernaeve, V.; Kolibianakis, E.; Tournaye, H.; Camus, M.; Van Steirteghem, A.; Devroey, P. Cumulative delivery rates after ICSI treatment cycles with freshly retrieved testicular sperm: A 7-year follow-up study. Hum. Reprod. 2003, 18, 1836–1840. [CrossRef][PubMed] 87. Aydos, K.; Demirel, L.C.; Baltaci, V.; Unlü, C. Enzymatic digestion plus mechanical searching improves testicular sperm retrieval in non-obstructive azoospermia cases. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2005, 120, 80–86. [CrossRef] J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 1400 16 of 18

88. Giorgetti, C.; Chinchole, J.M.; Hans, E.; Charles, O.; Franquebalme, J.P.; Glowaczower, E.; Salzmann, J.; Terriou, P.; Roulier, R. Crude cumulative delivery rate following ICSI using intentionally frozen-thawed testicular spermatozoa in 51 men with non-obstructive azoospermia. Reprod. Biomed. Online 2005, 11, 319–324. [CrossRef] 89. Mitchell, V.; Steger, K.; Marchetti, C.; Herbaut, J.C.; Devos, P.; Rigot, J.M. Cellular expression of protamine 1 and 2 transcripts in testicular spermatids from azoospermic men submitted to TESE-ICSI. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2005, 11, 373–379. [CrossRef] 90. Wu, B.; Wong, D.; Lu, S.; Dickstein, S.; Silva, M.; Gelety, T.J. Optimal use of fresh and frozen-thawed testicular sperm for intracytoplasmic sperm injection in azoospermic patients. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2005, 22, 389–394. [CrossRef] 91. Everaert, K.; De Croo, I.; Kerckhaert, W.; Dekuyper, P.; Dhont, M.; Van der Elst, J.; De Sutter, P.; Comhaire, F.; Mahmoud, A.; Lumen, N. Long term effects of micro-surgical testicular sperm extraction on androgen status in patients with non obstructive azoospermia. BMC Urol. 2006, 6, 9. [CrossRef] 92. Hibi, H.; Ohori, T.; Yamada, Y.; Honda, N.; Hashiba, Y.; Asada, Y. Testicular sperm extraction and ICSI in patients with post-chemotherapy non-obstructive azoospermia. Arch. Androl. 2007, 53, 63–65. [CrossRef] 93. Mitchell, V.; Lefebvre-Khalil, V.; Thomas, P.; Rigot, J.M.; Steger, K. Transition protein 1 mRNA expression is not related to pregnancy rate in azoospermic men undergoing TESE-ICSI. Andrologia 2007, 39, 124–127. [CrossRef][PubMed] 94. Kanto, S.; Sugawara, J.; Masuda, H.; Sasano, H.; Arai, Y.; Kyono, K. Fresh motile testicular sperm retrieved from nonobstructive azoospermic patients has the same potential to achieve fertilization and pregnancy via ICSI as sperm retrieved from obstructive azoospermic patients. Fertil. Steril. 2008, 90, 2010.e5–2010.e7. [CrossRef][PubMed] 95. Ravizzini, P.; Carizza, C.; Abdelmassih, V.; Abdelmassih, S.; Azevedo, M.; Abdelmassih, R. Microdissection testicular sperm extraction and IVF-ICSI outcome in nonobstructive azoospermia. Andrologia 2008, 40, 219–226. [CrossRef] 96. Ishikawa, T.; Shiotani, M.; Izumi, Y.; Hashimoto, H.; Kokeguchi, S.; Goto, S.; Fujisawa, M. Fertilization and pregnancy using cryopreserved testicular sperm for intracytoplasmic sperm injection with azoospermia. Fertil. Steril. 2009, 92, 174–179. [CrossRef] 97. Yarali, H.; Polat, M.; Bozdag, G.; Gunel, M.; Alpas, I.; Esinler, I.; Dogan, U.; Tiras, B. TESE-ICSI in patients with non-mosaic Klinefelter syndrome: A comparative study. Reprod. Biomed. Online 2009, 18, 756–760. [CrossRef] 98. Boitrelle, F.; Robin, G.; Marcelli, F.; Albert, M.; Leroy-Martin, B.; Dewailly, D.; Rigot, J.M.; Mitchell, V. A predictive score for testicular sperm extraction quality and surgical ICSI outcome in non-obstructive azoospermia: A retrospective study. Hum. Reprod. 2011, 26, 3215–3221. [CrossRef] 99. Hauser, R.; Bibi, G.; Yogev, L.; Carmon, A.; Azem, F.; Botchan, A.; Yavetz, H.; Klieman, S.E.; Lehavi, O.; Amit, A.; et al. Virtual azoospermia and cryptozoospermia–fresh/frozen testicular or ejaculate sperm for better IVF outcome? J. Androl. 2011, 32, 484–490. [CrossRef] 100. Hsiao, W.; Stahl, P.J.; Osterberg, E.C.; Nejat, E.; Palermo, G.D.; Rosenwaks, Z.; Schlegel, P.N.Successful treatment of postchemother- apy azoospermia with microsurgical testicular sperm extraction: The Weill Cornell experience. J. Clin. Oncol. 2011, 29, 1607–1611. [CrossRef] 101. Ashraf, M.C.; Singh, S.; Raj, D.; Ramakrishnan, S.; Esteves, S.C. Micro-dissection testicular sperm extraction as an alternative for sperm acquisition in the most difficult cases of Azoospermia: Technique and preliminary results in India. J. Hum. Reprod. Sci. 2013, 6, 111–123. [CrossRef][PubMed] 102. Choi, D.K.; Gong, I.H.; Hwang, J.H.; Oh, J.J.; Hong, J.Y. Detection of Y Chromosome Microdeletion is Valuable in the Treatment of Patients With Nonobstructive Azoospermia and Oligoasthenoteratozoospermia: Sperm Retrieval Rate and Birth Rate. Korean J. Urol. 2013, 54, 111–116. [CrossRef] 103. Karacan, M.; Alwaeely, F.; Erkan, S.; Çebi, Z.; Berbero˘glugil,M.; Batukan, M.; Ulu˘g,M.; Arvas, A.; Çamlıbel, T. Outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles with fresh testicular spermatozoa obtained on the day of or the day before oocyte collection and with cryopreserved testicular sperm in patients with azoospermia. Fertil. Steril. 2013, 100, 975–980. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 104. Arafa, M.M.; ElBardisi, H.T.; AlSaid, S.S.; Majzoub, A.; AlMalki, A.H.; ElRobi, I.; AlAnsari, A.A. Outcome of microsurgical testicular sperm extraction in familial idiopathic nonobstructive azoospermia. Andrologia 2015, 47, 1062–1067. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 105. Esteves, S.C.; Prudencio, C.; Seol, B.; Verza, S.; Knoedler, C.; Agarwal, A. Comparison of sperm retrieval and reproductive outcome in azoospermic men with testicular failure and obstructive azoospermia treated for infertility. Asian J. Androl. 2014, 16, 602–606. [CrossRef] 106. Karacan, M.; Ulug, M.; Arvas, A.; Cebi, Z.; Erkan, S.; Camlıbel, T. Live birth rate with repeat microdissection TESE and intracytoplasmic sperm injection after a conventional testicular biopsy in men with nonobstructive azoospermia. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2014, 183, 174–177. [CrossRef][PubMed] 107. Aydin, T.; Sofikerim, M.; Yucel, B.; Karadag, M.; Tokat, F. Effects of testicular histopathology on sperm retrieval rates and ICSI results in non-obstructive azoospermia. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2015, 35, 829–831. [CrossRef][PubMed] 108. Vloeberghs, V.; Verheyen, G.; Haentjens, P.; Goossens, A.; Polyzos, N.P.; Tournaye, H. How successful is TESE-ICSI in couples with non-obstructive azoospermia? Hum. Reprod. 2015, 30, 1790–1796. [CrossRef][PubMed] 109. Ko, J.K.; Chai, J.; Lee, V.C.; Li, R.H.; Lau, E.; Ho, K.L.; Tam, P.C.; Yeung, W.S.; Ho, P.C.; Ng, E.H. Sperm retrieval rate and pregnancy rate in infertile couples undergoing in-vitro and testicular sperm extraction for non-obstructive azoospermia in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Med. J. 2016, 22, 556–562. [CrossRef][PubMed] J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 1400 17 of 18

110. Alfano, M.; Ventimiglia, E.; Locatelli, I.; Capogrosso, P.; Cazzaniga, W.; Pederzoli, F.; Frego, N.; Matloob, R.; Saccà, A.; Pagliardini, L.; et al. Anti-Mullerian Hormone-to-Testosterone Ratio is Predictive of Positive Sperm Retrieval in Men with Idiopathic Non-Obstructive Azoospermia. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 17638. [CrossRef] 111. Arafa, M.M.; Majzoub, A.; AlSaid, S.S.; El Ansari, W.; Al Ansari, A.; Elbardisi, Y.; Elbardisi, H.T. Chromosomal abnormalities in infertile men with azoospermia and severe oligozoospermia in Qatar and their association with sperm retrieval intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes. Arab. J. Urol. 2018, 16, 132–139. [CrossRef][PubMed] 112. Yu, Y.; Xi, Q.; Pan, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Li, L.; Liu, R. Pregnancy and Neonatal Outcomes in Azoospermic Men After Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Using Testicular Sperm and Donor Sperm. Med. Sci. Monit 2018, 24, 6968–6974. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 113. Yamaguchi, K.; Ishikawa, T.; Mizuta, S.; Takeuchi, T.; Matsubayashi, H.; Kokeguchi, S.; Habara, T.; Ichioka, K.; Ohashi, M.; Okamoto, S.; et al. Clinical outcomes of microdissection testicular sperm extraction and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in Japanese men with Y chromosome microdeletions. Reprod. Med. Biol. 2020, 19, 158–163. [CrossRef][PubMed] 114. Corona, G.; Pizzocaro, A.; Lanfranco, F.; Garolla, A.; Pelliccione, F.; Vignozzi, L.; Ferlin, A.; Foresta, C.; Jannini, E.A.; Maggi, M.; et al. Sperm recovery and ICSI outcomes in Klinefelter syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum. Reprod. Update 2017, 23, 265–275. [CrossRef] 115. Park, S.H.; Lee, H.S.; Choe, J.H.; Lee, J.S.; Seo, J.T. Success rate of microsurgical multiple testicular sperm extraction and sperm presence in the ejaculate in korean men with y chromosome microdeletions. Korean J. Urol. 2013, 54, 536–540. [CrossRef][PubMed] 116. Stahl, P.J.; Masson, P.; Mielnik, A.; Marean, M.B.; Schlegel, P.N.; Paduch, D.A. A decade of experience emphasizes that testing for Y microdeletions is essential in American men with azoospermia and severe oligozoospermia. Fertil. Steril. 2010, 94, 1753–1756. [CrossRef] 117. Liu, X.H.; Qiao, J.; Li, R.; Yan, L.Y.; Chen, L.X. Y chromosome AZFc microdeletion may not affect the outcomes of ICSI for infertile males with fresh ejaculated sperm. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2013, 30, 813–819. [CrossRef] 118. Oates, R.D.; Silber, S.; Brown, L.G.; Page, D.C. Clinical characterization of 42 oligospermic or azoospermic men with microdeletion of the AZFc region of the Y chromosome, and of 18 children conceived via ICSI. Hum. Reprod. 2002, 17, 2813–2824. [CrossRef] 119. De Vries, J.W.; Repping, S.; Oates, R.; Carson, R.; Leschot, N.J.; van der Veen, F. Absence of deleted in azoospermia (DAZ) genes in spermatozoa of infertile men with somatic DAZ deletions. Fertil. Steril. 2001, 75, 476–479. [CrossRef] 120. Schmidt, K.L.; Larsen, E.; Bangsbøll, S.; Meinertz, H.; Carlsen, E.; Andersen, A.N. Assisted reproduction in male cancer survivors: Fertility treatment and outcome in 67 couples. Hum. Reprod. 2004, 19, 2806–2810. [CrossRef] 121. Gandini, L.; Sgrò, P.; Lombardo, F.; Paoli, D.; Culasso, F.; Toselli, L.; Tsamatropoulos, P.; Lenzi, A. Effect of chemo- or radiotherapy on sperm parameters of patients. Hum. Reprod. 2006, 21, 2882–2889. [CrossRef][PubMed] 122. Van der Kaaij, M.A.; van Echten-Arends, J.; Simons, A.H.; Kluin-Nelemans, H.C. Fertility preservation after chemotherapy for Hodgkin . Hematol. Oncol. 2010, 28, 168–179. [CrossRef][PubMed] 123. Cortes, D.; Thorup, J.M.; Visfeldt, J. Cryptorchidism: Aspects of fertility and . A study including data of 1335 consecutive boys who underwent testicular biopsy simultaneously with surgery for cryptorchidism. Horm. Res. 2001, 55, 21–27. [CrossRef] 124. Zorn, B.; Virant-Klun, I.; Drobni, S.; Sinkovec, J.; Meden-Vrtovec, H. Male and female factors that influence ICSI outcome in azoospermia or . Reprod. Biomed. Online 2009, 18, 168–176. [CrossRef] 125. Desai, N.; Gill, P.; Tadros, N.N.; Goldberg, J.M.; Sabanegh, E.; Falcone, T. Azoospermia and embryo morphokinetics: Testicular sperm-derived embryos exhibit delays in early cell cycle events and increased arrest prior to compaction. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2018, 35, 1339–1348. [CrossRef] 126. Loutradi, K.E.; Tarlatzis, B.C.; Goulis, D.G.; Zepiridis, L.; Pagou, T.; Chatziioannou, E.; Grimbizis, G.F.; Papadimas, I.; Bontis, I. The effects of sperm quality on embryo development after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2006, 23, 69–74. [CrossRef] 127. Janny, L.; Menezo, Y.J. Evidence for a strong paternal effect on human preimplantation embryo development and blastocyst formation. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 1994, 38, 36–42. [CrossRef] 128. Ron-el, R.; Nachum, H.; Herman, A.; Golan, A.; Caspi, E.; Soffer, Y. Delayed fertilization and poor embryonic development associated with impaired . Fertil. Steril. 1991, 55, 338–344. [CrossRef] 129. Shoukir, Y.; Chardonnens, D.; Campana, A.; Sakkas, D. Blastocyst development from supernumerary embryos after intracytoplas- mic sperm injection: A paternal influence? Hum. Reprod. 1998, 13, 1632–1637. [CrossRef] 130. Göker, E.N.; Sendag, F.; Levi, R.; Sendag, H.; Tavmergen, E. Comparison of the ICSI outcome of ejaculated sperm with normal, abnormal parameters and testicular sperm. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2002, 104, 129–136. [CrossRef] 131. Vernaeve, V.; Tournaye, H.; Osmanagaoglu, K.; Verheyen, G.; Van Steirteghem, A.; Devroey, P. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection with testicular spermatozoa is less successful in men with nonobstructive azoospermia than in men with obstructive azoospermia. Fertil. Steril. 2003, 79, 529–533. [CrossRef] 132. Nicopoullos, J.D.; Gilling-Smith, C.; Almeida, P.A.; Ramsay, J.W. The results of 154 ICSI cycles using surgically retrieved sperm from azoospermic men. Hum. Reprod. 2004, 19, 579–585. [CrossRef][PubMed] 133. Sakkas, D. Novel technologies for selecting the best sperm for in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil. Steril. 2013, 99, 1023–1029. [CrossRef][PubMed] J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 1400 18 of 18

134. Gil, M.; Sar-Shalom, V.; Melendez Sivira, Y.; Carreras, R.; Checa, M.A. Sperm selection using magnetic activated cell sorting (MACS) in assisted reproduction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2013, 30, 479–485. [CrossRef] 135. Antinori, M.; Licata, E.; Dani, G.; Cerusico, F.; Versaci, C.; d’Angelo, D.; Antinori, S. Intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection: A prospective randomized trial. Reprod. Biomed. Online 2008, 16, 835–841. [CrossRef] 136. Teixeira, D.M.; Hadyme Miyague, A.; Barbosa, M.A.; Navarro, P.A.; Raine-Fenning, N.; Nastri, C.O.; Martins, W.P. Regular (ICSI) versus ultra-high magnification (IMSI) sperm selection for assisted reproduction. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2020, 2, Cd010167. [CrossRef] 137. Parrella, A.; Keating, D.; Cheung, S.; Xie, P.; Stewart, J.D.; Rosenwaks, Z.; Palermo, G.D. A treatment approach for couples with disrupted sperm DNA integrity and recurrent ART failure. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2019, 36, 2057–2066. [CrossRef][PubMed] 138. Xie, P.; Keating, D.; Parrella, A.; Cheung, S.; Rosenwaks, Z.; Goldstein, M.; Palermo, G.D. Sperm Genomic Integrity by TUNEL Varies throughout the Male Genital Tract. J. Urol. 2020, 203, 802–808. [CrossRef] 139. Quinn, M.M.; Jalalian, L.; Ribeiro, S.; Ona, K.; Demirci, U.; Cedars, M.I.; Rosen, M.P. Microfluidic sorting selects sperm for clinical use with reduced DNA damage compared to density gradient centrifugation with swim-up in split semen samples. Human. Reprod. 2018, 33, 1388–1393. [CrossRef] 140. Samuel, R.; Feng, H.; Jafek, A.; Despain, D.; Jenkins, T.; Gale, B. Microfluidic-based sperm sorting & analysis for treatment of male infertility. Transl. Androl. Urol. 2018, 7, S336–S347. [CrossRef]