DOCSLIB.ORG

Northern Gas Networks Limited

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

BEFORE THE COMPETITION AND MARKETS AUTHORITY AN APPEAL UNDER SECTION 23B OF THE GAS ACT 1986 BETWEEN: NORTHERN GAS NETWORKS LIMITED Appellant and THE GAS AND ELECTRICITY MARKETS AUTHORITY Respondent NOTICE OF APPEAL GAS DISTRIBUTION LICENCE MODIFICATION RIIO-GD2 PRICE CONTROL Linklaters LLP One Silk Street London EC2Y 8HQ Tel +44 20 7456 2000 Fax +20 7456 2222 Table of Contents Contents Page PART I INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 2 1 Overview ................................................................................................................................. 2 2 Request for permission to appeal ........................................................................................... 2 3 Scope of the Appellant’s appeal .............................................................................................. 2 4 Key documents........................................................................................................................ 3 5 Contact details......................................................................................................................... 3 5.1 Appellant ................................................................................................................................. 3 5.2 Appellant’s address for receipt of documents ......................................................................... 3 5.3 Solicitors to the Appellant ........................................................................................................ 4 6 Structure of this Notice ............................................................................................................ 4 PART II CONTEXT OF RIIO-GD2 AND THIS APPEAL .................................................................... 5 1 Overview ................................................................................................................................. 5 2 Pathway to RIIO-GD2 and incentive-based regulation ........................................................... 5 2.1 The RPI-X regime from 1990-2015 ......................................................................................... 5 2.2 The RIIO-GD1 regime ............................................................................................................. 5 1.1 The RIIO-GD2 regime ............................................................................................................. 6 3 Context to this appeal ............................................................................................................. 6 PART III SUMMARY OF THE GROUNDS OF APPEAL AND RELIEF SOUGHT ........................... 10 1 Overview ............................................................................................................................... 10 2 Appeal Ground 1: Cost of Equity........................................................................................... 10 2.1 Risk-free rate ......................................................................................................................... 10 2.2 Beta ........................................................................................................................................11 2.3 Total market return .................................................................................................................11 2.4 Aiming-up .............................................................................................................................. 12 2.5 Legal consequences ............................................................................................................. 13 3 Appeal Ground 2: Outperformance Wedge .......................................................................... 15 ii 3.1 Legal consequences ............................................................................................................. 16 4 Appeal Ground 3: Ongoing efficiency ................................................................................... 16 4.1 Base ongoing efficiency challenge ........................................................................................ 16 4.2 Innovation uplift ..................................................................................................................... 17 4.3 Legal consequences ............................................................................................................. 18 5 Appeal Ground 4: BPI Stage 4 .............................................................................................. 18 5.1 BPI Stage 4 ........................................................................................................................... 18 5.2 Efficient cost benchmark ....................................................................................................... 19 5.3 Legal consequences ............................................................................................................. 20 6 Consequences for the Appellant ........................................................................................... 20 7 Consequences for customers ............................................................................................... 21 8 Relief Sought ......................................................................................................................... 22 9 The facts and reasons supporting the appeal ....................................................................... 23 PART IV STATUTORY FRAMEWORK ............................................................................................ 24 1 Overview ............................................................................................................................... 24 2 Statutory grounds of appeal .................................................................................................. 24 2.1 Sub-section 23D(4)(a): GEMA failed properly to have regard to any matter in sub-section (2) .............................................................................................................................................. 24 2.2 Sub-section 23D(4)(b): GEMA failed to give the appropriate weight to any of its obligations .............................................................................................................................................. 28 2.3 Sub-section 23D(4)(c): GEMA’s decision was based, wholly or partly, on an error of fact ... 29 2.4 Sub-section 23D(4)(d): The licence modifications fail to achieve, in whole or in part, the effect stated by GEMA .......................................................................................................... 29 2.5 Sub-section 23D(4)(e): GEMA’s decision was wrong in law ................................................. 29 3 Standard of review ................................................................................................................ 30 4 Materiality .............................................................................................................................. 31 5 Relief sought ......................................................................................................................... 32 PART V APPEAL GROUND 1: COST OF EQUITY ......................................................................... 34 1 Overview ............................................................................................................................... 34 iii 2 Framework for setting the cost of equity, NGN’s Business Plan approach and subsequent developments ........................................................................................................................ 38 3 The risks facing GDNs .......................................................................................................... 39 4 GEMA’s errors in its approach to cost of equity .................................................................... 40 4.1 RFR ....................................................................................................................................... 40 4.2 Beta ....................................................................................................................................... 44 4.3 Total Market Return ............................................................................................................... 48 4.4 Setting a point estimate of cost of equity .............................................................................. 52 5 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................. 56 6 Relief sought ......................................................................................................................... 58 PART VI APPEAL GROUND 2: OUTPERFORMANCE WEDGE .................................................... 59 1 Overview ............................................................................................................................... 59 2 GEMA’s approach and decision on the outperformance wedge ........................................... 61 2.1 Development of GEMA’s approach ....................................................................................... 62 2.2 GEMA’s position at Draft Determinations .............................................................................. 62 2.3 GEMA’s position at FD .........................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Part II BUYERS GUIDE Products, Research and Services INDEX Countries

    Part II BUYERS GUIDE Products, Research and Services INDEX Countries

    Part II BUYERS GUIDE Products, Research and Services INDEX Countries Note: The abbreviations listed against each country in this index are those used elsewhere in the directory (eg in the BUYERS GUIDE section and in the ORGANIZATION index) to indicate the national location of organizations. ARGENTINA AR ITALY I AUSTRALIA AU JAPAN J AUSTRIA A KENYA KE BANGLADESH BA KOREA KO BELGIUM B MALAWI MW BRAZIL BR MALAYSIA MA CANADA CAN MAURITIUS MT CHILE CL NETHERLANDS NL CHINA CA NEW ZEALAND NZ COSTA RICA CR NORWAY N CUBA cu PAKISTAN PA CYPRUS CY PHILIPPINES PH DENMARK DK POLAND PO EGYPT EG PORTUGAL p FINLAND SF SPAIN E FRANCE F SWEDEN s GERMANY D SWITZERLAND H GREECE GR UNITED KINGDOM UK GUATEMALA GU UNITED STATES us HUNGARY HU WEST INDIES WI INDIA IN YUGOSLAVIA YU IRELAND IRL ZIMBABWE ZI ISRAEL IS 165 INDEX Companies & Organizations 3T Engineering US ASTRA IN A & C Kosik GmbH D AVG Technical Services GmbH D A Ahlstrom Oy SF AZF groupe CDF Chimie F A Biotec I Aachen Technical University D A C Bamlett Ltd UK Aalborg University Centre DK A C Foreman Ltd UK Abay SA B A E Higginson MBE UK Abbott Laboratories US A E Staley Manufacturing Co US Abbott Trower & Co Ltd UK A 0 Smith Harvestore Productions Ltd UK Abcor Environmental Systems Ltd UK A 0 Smith Harvestore Products Inc us Abcor Inc US A-trans S Aberystwyth University College of Wales UK AB Generator (UK) Ltd UK Abetong Sabema B ABC Holdings Ltd UK Abetong Sabema DK ABC Waste Handling Systems UK Abetong Sabema S AC Biotechnics AB S Abitibi-Price Inc CAN AC Invest Produkt AB S Acadian Distillers
  • Electricity) and 2009/73/EC (Gas)

    Electricity) and 2009/73/EC (Gas)

    2016 Great Britain and Northern Ireland National Reports to the European Commission National Reports in relation to Directives 2009/72/EC (Electricity) and 2009/73/EC (Gas) Ofgem 2016 National Report to the European Commission Overview All National Regulatory Authorities (NRAs) are obliged to report annually to the European Commission, in accordance with Directives 2009/72/EC (Electricity Directive) and 2009/73/EC (Gas Directive). The structure of the report is agreed at the Council of European Energy Regulators (CEER). Ofgem is the UK Office of Gas and Electricity Markets. It is governed by the Gas and Electricity Markets Authority (the Authority).1 The terms ‘the Authority’, ‘Ofgem’, ‘us’ and ‘we’ are used interchangeably in this document. The Northern Ireland National Report is in the second section of this UK response. The Great Britain (GB) report covers: Developments in the GB energy markets in 2015 and Quarter I + II of 2016; The regulation and performance of the GB electricity and gas markets along the themes of network regulation, promoting competition, and security of supply Our compliance with the Electricity and Gas Directives on consumer protection and dispute settlement Since GB energy markets have been fully liberalised and the regulatory structures in place for a number of years, this report is intended as an updated version of the submissions made since 2007. The structure of this report and much of the information remains unchanged, although latest data is supplied. Finally, for further information on Ofgem’s activities, please consult our Annual Reports. The 2015-16 Ofgem Annual Report is available at the link below.2 Contacts: Sean Hennity Ryan McLaughlin Ofgem, EU Coordination Ofgem, Head of European Wholesale Markets 9 Millbank, London, SW1 3GE 9 Millbank, London, SW1 3GE 0207 3269 9951 020 3269 9615 [email protected] [email protected] 1 The Authority determines strategy, sets policy priorities and takes decisions on a range of matters, including price controls and enforcement.
  • Annual Review 2007 Delivering Gas to the North of England Northern Gas Networks

    Annual Review 2007 Delivering Gas to the North of England Northern Gas Networks

    Annual Review 2007 Delivering gas to the North of England Northern Gas Networks 2 Annual Review 2007 Corporate Directory Northern Gas Networks Limited 1100 Century Way Thorpe Park Business Park Colton LEEDS LS15 8TU Telephone: 0113 397 5300 Facsimile: 0113 397 5301 Website: www.northerngasnetworks.co.uk Gas Emergencies: Call 0800 111 999* at any time. *All calls are recorded and may be monitored. 27 Phone 0113 397 5300 The National Gas Emergency Service is available 24 hours Web www.northerngasnetworks.co.uk a day, every day. FREEPHONE 0800 111 999*. *All calls are recorded and may be monitored Annual Review 2007 Contents The Year under Review 4 Chief Executive Offi cer’s Review 6 Ownership Structure 10 Business Strategy 11 Business Review 13 Performance Review 17 Corporate Governance 20 The Management Team 21 Board of Directors 23 Results Summary 2007 26 Corporate Directory 27 3 Northern Gas Networks The Year under Review In the second full calendar year of operations Northern Gas Networks continued to develop within the UK’s energy industry. Building on solid foundations, the company delivered improvements in its fi nancial effi ciency, in health and safety and in its customer service, positioning the organisation as one of the leaders in the UK gas industry. 4 Annual Review 2007 The company won a prestigious Utility Award for the work in delivering the new suite of computer systems which underpin daily operations. Northern Gas Networks delivers gas through 37,000km of Notable achievements during 2007 include the fi nalisation pipes to around 2.6m homes and businesses in the North of of the fi ve-year Price Control Review, under which Ofgem England, an area of 27,000 square miles covering northern sets the company’s revenue and operational targets for Cumbria, the North East and much of Yorkshire.
  • A14 - Our Whole Systems Strategy 1

    A14 - Our Whole Systems Strategy 1

    Final RIIO-2 Business Plan Submission December 2019 Appendix A14 - Our Whole Systems Strategy 1 Page left intentionally blank. Final RIIO-2 Business Plan Submission December 2019 Appendix A14 - Our Whole Systems Strategy 2 Foreword This document outlines Northern Gas Networks’ Whole Systems Strategy. This strategy addresses Ofgem’s business plan guidance for us to provide information on our approach to enabling whole systems solutions in our RIIO-2 Business Plan. We have developed this strategy in conjunction with key whole systems stakeholders. Importantly, NGN is committed to supporting the achievement of the UK’s net zero emission targets and our Whole Systems Strategy sets out how we intend to contribute. The purpose of this document has been to assist us with: • determining our role in the whole systems landscape; • determining how we will interact with other stakeholders in the creation of an integrated energy system; and • defining the actions that we will need to take to deliver against our objectives. We also note the interactions between this document, our Environmental Action Plan, Innovation Strategy and Customers in Vulnerable Situations Strategy: • Environmental Action Plan – this is the primary regulatory document that sets out the environmental impacts of our business operations as well as short-term initiatives to reduce these impacts and our long-term strategy to contribute to the net zero emission targets by 2050, for the benefit of customers. • Innovation Strategy – this sets out our approach to delivering innovation in RIIO-2 (particularly in relation to enabling the achievement of our net zero emission targets and supporting customers in vulnerable situations), with a focus on the benefits provided to customers.
  • Media Kit 2021 INTRODUCTION

    Media Kit 2021 INTRODUCTION

    www.nsenergybusiness.com www.windpower-international.com media kit 2021 INTRODUCTION www.windpower-international.com Who are we, what we do.. Wind is one of the fastest-growing power sources in the world, as energy systems shift towards clean, renewable forms of generation. More than 60 GW of new capacity was installed globally in 2019 – a 20% POWERED BY 170 YEARS OF ENERGY INDUSTRY EXPERTISE annual increase – and although the pandemic has slowed the pace of this trajectory, wind has remained resilient during the crisis and record growth is Progressive Media International presents to you World Wind Technology as part expected over the next five years. of a larger portfolio including Nuclear Engineering International, Modern Power Systems, International Water Power & Dam Construction, World Expro and World As more and more countries around the world target emissions reduction Mining Frontiers. – including key growth markets of China, Europe and the US under a new administration – the sector is poised for a bright future. Now is the time for suppliers establish themselves in this dynamic market as a wave of new projects and upgrades is announced and governments accelerate their clean-energy ambitions over the coming decade. World Wind Technology will provide key executives, who have the power to make purchasing decisions, with unique analysis and data combined with contributions from leading industry analysts, practitioners and thought leaders. Our unique and powerful database of readers includes qualified senior management and executive decision makers, who have the authority to buy the products and services they need in order to capitalise on the opportunities in the market.
  • A Vision for Scotland's Electricity and Gas Networks

    A Vision for Scotland's Electricity and Gas Networks

    A vision for Scotland’s electricity and gas networks DETAIL 2019 - 2030 A vision for scotland’s electricity and gas networks 2 CONTENTS CHAPTER 1: SUPPORTING OUR ENERGY SYSTEM 03 The policy context 04 Supporting wider Scottish Government policies 07 The gas and electricity networks today 09 CHAPTER 2: DEVELOPING THE NETWORK INFRASTRUCTURE 13 Electricity 17 Gas 24 CHAPTER 3: COORDINATING THE TRANSITION 32 Regulation and governance 34 Whole system planning 36 Network funding 38 CHAPTER 4: SCOTLAND LEADING THE WAY – INNOVATION AND SKILLS 39 A vision for scotland’s electricity and gas networks 3 CHAPTER 1: SUPPORTING OUR ENERGY SYSTEM A vision for scotland’s electricity and gas networks 4 SUPPORTING OUR ENERGY SYSTEM Our Vision: By 2030… Scotland’s energy system will have changed dramatically in order to deliver Scotland’s Energy Strategy targets for renewable energy and energy productivity. We will be close to delivering the targets we have set for 2032 for energy efficiency, low carbon heat and transport. Our electricity and gas networks will be fundamental to this progress across Scotland and there will be new ways of designing, operating and regulating them to ensure that they are used efficiently. The policy context The energy transition must also be inclusive – all parts of society should be able to benefit. The Scotland’s Energy Strategy sets out a vision options we identify must make sense no matter for the energy system in Scotland until 2050 – what pathways to decarbonisation might targeting a sustainable and low carbon energy emerge as the best. Improving the efficiency of system that works for all consumers.
  • Annex C Preliminary Uxo Threat Assessment

    Annex C Preliminary Uxo Threat Assessment

    Keadby 3 Low Carbon Gas Power Station Preliminary Environmental Information Report, Volume II - Appendix 13A: Phase 1 Desk Based Assessment Application Reference EN010114 ANNEX C PRELIMINARY UXO THREAT ASSESSMENT October 2020 Page 67 P RELIMINARY UNEXPLODED ORDNANCE (UXO) THREAT ASSESSMENT Meeting the requirements of CIRIA C681 ‘Unexploded Ordnance (UXO) – A guide for the Construction Industry’ Risk Management Framework PROJECT NUMBER 8472 ORIGINATOR D. Barrett VERSION NUMBER 1.0 REVIEWED BY L. Gregory (15th October 2020) CLIENT AECOM RELEASED BY R. Griffiths (15th October 2020) STUDY SITE Keadby 3 Low-Carbon Gas Power Station Project RECOMMENDATION No further action is required to address the UXO risk at this Study Site 6 Alpha Associates Limited, Unit 2A Woolpit Business Park, Bury St Edmunds, IP30 9UP, United Kingdom T: +44 (0)2033 713 900 | W: www.6alpha.com UNEXPLODED ORDNANCE THREAT ASSESSMENT STUDY SITE The Study Site is described as “Keadby 3 Low-Carbon Gas Power Station Project”, and it is centred on National Grid Reference 481834, 411442. THREAT POTENTIAL AND RECOMMENDATIONS The potential for a UXO hazard to occur, and more specifically, the potential for unexploded WWI and WWII ordnance to exist at this site is assessed as being UNLIKELY (Figure 2). In accordance with CIRIA C681 Chapter 5 on managing UXO risks, 6 Alpha concludes that NO FURTHER ACTION is required to address the UXO risk at this Study Site. Should you have any queries, please contact 6 Alpha. REPORT SUMMARY During WWII, the Study Site was situated within Isle of Axholme Rural District and Glanford Brigg Rural District, which recorded less than one and one High Explosive (HE) bomb strikes per 100 hectares respectively; both very low levels of bombing.
  • Hull Core Strategy - Contacts List (As at July 2011)

    Hull Core Strategy - Contacts List (As at July 2011)

    Hull Core Strategy - Contacts List (as at July 2011) Introduction This report provides details about the contacts made during the development of the Hull Core Strategy. It includes contact made at each plan making stage, as follows: • Issues and Options – August 2008 • Emerging Preferred Approach – February 2010 • Core Strategy Questionnaire – September 2010 • Spatial Options – February 2011 • Core Strategy Publication Version – July 2011 A list of Hull Development Forum members (as at July 2011) is also enclosed. This group has met over 15 times, usually on a quarterly basis. The report also sets out the specific and general organisations and bodies that have been contacted, in conformity with the Council’s adopted Statement of Community Involvement. Specific groups are indicated with an asterisk. Please note contacts will change over time. Issues and Options – August 2008 (Letter sent to Consultants/Agents) Your Ref: My Ref: PPI/KG/JP Contact: Mr Keith Griffiths «Title» «First_Name» «Surname» Tel: 01482 612389 «Job_Title» Fax: 01482 612382 Email: [email protected] «Org» th «Add1» Date: 4 August 2008 «Add2» «Add3» «Town» «Postcode» Dear Sir/Madam Hull Core Strategy - issues, options and suggested preferred option Please find enclosed the ‘Hull Core Strategy issues, options and suggested preferred option’ document for your consideration. Your views should be returned to us by the 5 September, 2008 by using the form provided. In particular, could you respond to the following key questions: 1. What do you think to the issues, objectives, options and suggested preferred option set out in the document? 2. How would you combine the options? 3.
  • Morrison Utility Services

    Morrison Utility Services

    Our Capabilities Our Business Our Group 175967 M Group Services Brochure .indd 1 03/11/2017 12:37 Our Business Delivering services to a broad range of clients across regulated markets and essential infrastructure. We are proud of what we do, how we operate and what we deliver to support our client’s customers. We help our clients deliver their business plans each and every day of the year. Delivering for our clients The challenges our clients face can be from the development of collaborative complex, ever challenging budgets and working through, improvements in customer increasing customer demands mean they service, sharing of innovation and best need a service provider who can be practice, development and training, trusted to deliver quality work, consistently stakeholder management, value engineering, and safety. resource planning, business process We have developed our group capability to improvement, design and build services, align to our client’s needs and the outputs cost control & stock management, they require for their customers. Our data management to plant & fleet service operational delivery includes everything solutions. What we do We provide a broad range of essential Working in collaboration with our clients to infrastructure services within regulated deliver for their customers sectors across the UK and Ireland Proven track record and excellent client Four core regulated sectors; relationships - Utilities Nationwide coverage with over 8,000 - Transport direct staff and growing - Data - Telecommunications Service ethos
  • CD5.62 Utilities Report

    CD5.62 Utilities Report

    Sandown Park Redevelopment Utilities Assessment 22 January 2019 Waterman Infrastructure & Environment Limited Merchants House, Wapping Road, Bristol, BS1 4RW www.watermangroup.com Client Name: The Jockey Club Document Reference: WIE15367-100-R-1-2-2-Utilities Project Number: WIE15367 Quality Assurance – Approval Status This document has been prepared and checked in accordance with Waterman Group’s IMS (BS EN ISO 9001: 2015, BS EN ISO 14001: 2015 and BS OHSAS 18001:2007) Issue Date Prepared by Checked by Approved by 01 10/01/2019 A Godfrey J Burdon J Burdon 02 22/01/2019 A Godfrey J Burdon J Burdon Comments 01 First Draft 02 Final issue. Updated following further utility provider responses Comments Disclaimer This report has been prepared by Waterman Infrastructure & Environment Limited, with all reasonable skill, care and diligence within the terms of the Contract with the client, incorporation of our General Terms and Condition of Business and taking account of the resources devoted to us by agreement with the client. We disclaim any responsibility to the client and others in respect of any matters outside the scope of the above. This report is confidential to the client and we accept no responsibility of whatsoever nature to third parties to whom this report, or any part thereof, is made known. Any such party relies on the report at its own risk. Contents 1. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background to Project .....................................................................................................
  • Northern Gas Networks

    Northern Gas Networks

    Network Innovation Annual Summary 2018-19 Innovating on the streets of the North of England Meet the Innovation team 1 4 2 3 5 Our core innovation team looks after the overall management of our NIA funded projects, sets the strategic direction, and identifies new and exciting opportunities. The team also provides support to colleagues across the business, helping them devise and deliver innovative ways of working, become earlier adopters of new innovations, and embrace an innovation mindset. We believe a culture of innovation should permeate our whole business, and not be restricted to a single function. Through collaboration with colleagues and suppliers, we’re developing novel solutions that make our customers’ lives easier, and make bills go further. 1 Richard Hynes-Cooper 4 Michael Charlton Head of Innovation Innovation Implementation Manager [email protected] [email protected] 2 Wayne Smith 5 Shannon Smith Innovation Manager Project Support [email protected] [email protected] 3 Jarred Knott Innovation and Regulation Support Contact us [email protected] [email protected] 2 | MEET THE INNOVATION TEAM INNOVATION REPORT 2019 Everyday innovation… innovation every day Mark Horsley Chief Executive Officer Northern Gas Networks Whether we are replacing pipes, responding Many of our innovation projects have now to gas emergencies, supporting vulnerable become business as usual, delivering cost communities or exploring new forms of energy, savings and customer benefits each and every innovation can help us do a better job, at a day. better price. As we prepare for our next regulatory period Like the other UK gas networks, we receive from 2021, with a new business plan, innovation funding from our regulator, Ofgem, to develop will continue to be at the heart of everything innovative products and techniques that allow we do – helping us to meet stretching us to do our core work more effectively.
  • Gas NIC Submission from National Grid Gas Distribution

    Gas NIC Submission from National Grid Gas Distribution

    Project Code/Version Number: NGGDGN03/2 1. Project Summary 1.1. Project Title HyDeploy The project will demonstrate that natural gas containing levels of 1.2. Project hydrogen beyond those in the GS(M)R specification can be Explanation distributed and utilised safely & efficiently for the first time in a section of the UK distribution network. Successful demonstration has the potential to facilitate 29TWh pa of decarbonised heat in the GB, and more by unlocking extensive hydrogen use. 1.3. Funding National Grid Gas Distribution licensee: 1.4.1. The Problem(s) it is exploring 1.4. Project The UK has committed to substantial carbon savings; heat description: contributes to a third of its current emissions. Reducing heating carbon intensity via hydrogen over the gas grid provides a customer-focused solution, but is limited by the current tight GS(M)R UK limits. 1.4.2. The Method(s) that it will use to solve the Problem(s) The first UK practical deployment of hydrogen onto a live gas network since the transition from town gas. Taking advantage of Keele University’s gas network risk manages project delivery and enables a more ambitious trial than would otherwise be achievable. This 3 year project, starting April 2017, is based on the principle of survey, test & trial necessary to secure HSE Exemption to GS(M)R and roll out the testing programme. 1.4.3. The Solution(s) it is looking to reach by applying the Method(s) The project provides a body of practical, referenceable data which is an essential pre-requisite to enable wider deployment of hydrogen and therefore delivery of cost-effective, non-disruptive carbon savings to the customer.