Arxiv:0905.0074V1 [Quant-Ph] 1 May 2009 Igepoo Ttswierjcighge Htnnum- Photon Only Higher 17]
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
An Entanglement Filter 1,2, 3, 4 Ryo Okamoto, ∗ Jeremy L. O’Brien, ∗ Holger F. Hofmann, 1, 2 1 1,2, Tomohisa Nagata, Keiji Sasaki, and Shigeki Takeuchi † 1Research Institute for Electronic Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0812, Japan 2The Institute of Scientific and Industrial Research, Osaka University, Mihogaoka 8-1, Ibaraki, Osaka 567-0047, Japan 3Centre for Quantum Photonics, H. H. Wills Physics Laboratory & Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University of Bristol, Merchant Venturers Building, Woodland Road, Bristol, BS8 1UB, UK 4Graduate School of Advanced Sciences of Matter, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima 739-8530, Japan The ability to filter quantum states is a key capability in quantum information science and tech- nology, where one-qubit filters, or polarizers, have found wide application. Filtering on the basis of entanglement requires extension to multi-qubit filters with qubit-qubit interactions. We demonstrate an optical entanglement filter that passes a pair of photons if they have the desired correlations of their polarization. Such devices have many important applications to quantum technologies. PACS numbers: Filters, that pass the desired and reject the unwanted ber states have also been realized by using ancillary pho- (material, signal, frequency, polarization, etc) are one tons and photon detection to induce the required optical of the most important scientific and technological tools non-linearity [18, 19, 20]. The concept of a polarization available to us. Quantum information science and tech- filter can be extended to a higher dimensional Hilbert nology is concerned with harnessing quantum mechan- space of multi-qubits and one may anticipate that the ical effects to gain exponential improvement and new necessary qubit-qubit interactions required will also re- functionality for particular tasks in communication [1], quire the use of ancillary photons. computation [2], measurement [3], and lithography [4]. The two-photon polarization filter proposed in [5] is a Perhaps the most unique of these quantum mechanical device that transmits photon pairs only if they share the features is entanglement. Filters which act on the quan- same horizontal or vertical polarization without decreas- tum correlations associated with entanglement must op- ing the quantum coherence between these two possibili- erate non-locally on multiple quantum systems, typically ties (Fig. 1B). As this filter is not sensitive to the individ- two-level qubits. Such a device has been proposed for ual polarization of the photons, it can preserve and even photonic qubits [5], however, the technical requirements create entanglement between the photons passed through to build such a device, an optical circuit with two ancil- it (Fig. 1C). The filter achieves this two qubit filtering lary photons and multiple quantum gates, requiring both effect by using two ancilla photons as probes that de- quantum interference and classical interference in several tect whether the two input photons are in the desired nested interferomters, have been lacking. states or not. Detection of the ancilla photons indicates We demonstrate an entanglement filter by combining a successful filter operation, requiring no post-selection in two key recent technological approaches—a displaced- the output. Note that this is a significant difference be- Sagnac architecture [6] and partially polarizing beam tween this filter and the function realized by output post- splitters [7, 8, 9]. The entangling capability of the filter selection on a polarizing beam splitter [14, 21], where arXiv:0905.0074v1 [quant-ph] 1 May 2009 was verified, distinguishing it from classical ones. As our it is necessary to eliminate the cases where both pho- entanglement filter acts on photonic qubits, it is promis- tons exit on the same side. Because our filter should ing for quantum technologies, as photons are the logical reliably produce the correct two photon output in sepa- choice for communication [1, 10], metrology [6, 11] and rate ports of the device, it can be integrated into larger lithography [12], and are a leading approach to informa- quantum information networks, just like a one-qubit po- tion processing [13]. The filter can be used for the cre- larization filter. It is therefore possible to apply it to a ation as well as the purification of entanglement [14, 15], wide range of problems, such as encoding quantum infor- which will be important in realizing quantum relays and mation in multiple-qubits and entanglement purification repeaters for long distance quantum communication. from mixed entangled states. The most common examples of a filter for photonic The operation of this filter can be summarized by a qubits is a polarizer that transmits only the horizontal single operator Sˆ describing the effect on an arbitrary component of the incident photons (Fig. 1A). Polariza- two photon input state [5]: tion filters are crucial for the initialization and read out 1 of photonic qubits as well as for the measurement re- Sˆ = ( HH HH V V V V ), (1) lated effects such as the quantum Zeno effect [16, 17]. 4 | ih | − | ih | More sophisticated photonic filters that transmit only where HH and V V denotes the state where both inci- single photon states while rejecting higher photon num- dent photons| i are| horizontallyi (H) and vertically (V ) po- 2 A schematic of the optical quantum circuit for the en- tanglement filter Fig. 2A shows that multi photon inter- ferences occur at each of the four beam splitters BS1 to BS4. The crucial ones are BS2 and BS3. The working principle of the quantum circuit is as follows: whenever one of the ancilla photons meets a single input photon at BS2 or BS3, two photon quantum interference between the reflection of both photons and the exchange of an- cilla and input photon reduces the probability of finding a single photon at D1 or D2 to zero (Fig. 2A, inset) [22]. Thus, a single horizontally polarized photon cannot pass the circuit, resulting in the elimination of the HV and VH components. However, the HH component| i | i | i FIG. 1: The function of a polarization filter and a entangle- can pass because the two input photons will both ar- ment filter. (A) Polarization filter pass only the certain polar- rive at BS2 or BS3 together (the two H photons undergo ization component of single photons. (B) Entanglement filter quantum interference at BS1). In that case, the negative pass a pair of photons only if they share the same horizontal probability amplitude corresponding to the exchange of or vertical polarization. (C) As the quantum coherence be- tween these two possibilities is preserved during the process, the ancilla photon and one of the input photons is higher the output state is entangled when two diagonally polarized than the positive probability amplitude for three photon photons are input. reflection, and the HH component is transmitted with a flipped phase. | i To realize the quantum optical circuit of Fig. 2A, we larized, respectively. This operator filters out the HV have combined two recent technological approaches in or- and VH components of the two photon state| with-i | i der to simplify and stabilize quantum optical circuits: out reducing the coherence between the remaining HH the displaced-Sagnac architecture [6] and partially po- and V V components. The negative sign between| thei | i larizing beam splitters (PPBSs) [7, 8, 9]. The PPBSs terms is a consequence of the phase difference between reflect vertically polarized photons perfectly while trans- two photon reflection and two photon transmission at mitting/reflecting horizontally polarized photons with the beam splitters. The factor of 1/4 is an expression of 50% probability. Replacing all the beam splitters (BS1 to the transmission probability of 1/16 for HH and V V . | i | i BS4) with such PPBSs, we can remove the four polariz- It should be noted however that the detection of the an- ing beamsplitters used to separate the two polarizations cilla photons indicates a successful transmission of the (Fig. 2B). The remaining optical path interferometer is two input photons, so that it is not necessary to detect realized as a displaced Sagnac interferometer (Fig. 2C). the output photons in order to know that they were suc- In this setup, all the four polarization modes of two input cessfully transmitted. photons pass through all the optical components inside To understand the unique quantum properties of this the interferometer so that the path-differences between filter, it is useful to consider the effects of the filtering those four polarization modes are robust against drifts process on two diagonally polarized photons. As diag- or vibrations of optical components. onal polarizations are coherent superpositions of hor- We used photons generated via type-I spontaneous izontal and vertical polarizations ( P 1 ( H + | i ≡ √2 | i parametric down-conversion [23]. The pump laser pulses V ); M 1 ( H V )), two diagonally polar- (82 MHz, @ 390 nm) pass through a beta-barium borate | i | i ≡ √2 | i − | i ized photons have a well defined coherence between (BBO) crystal twice to generate two pairs of photons. their HH and V V components that determines Two photons in one of the pairs are used as the signal whether| theiri diagonal| polarizationsi are parallel (+) [eg: photons, and the two photons in the other pair are used 1 P P / MM = 2 ( HH + V V ...)] or orthogonal as the ancillary photons. The visibility of the Hong-Ou- | i | i | i1 | i± ( )[eg: PM / MP = 2 ( HH V V ...)]. The op- Mandel dip [22] was 96 1% for two photons in the same − ˆ| i | i | i−| i± pair, and 85 5% for photons± from different pairs. To test erator S preserves the magnitude of this coherence, but ± flips the sign: Eq. 1. Therefore, the correlation between the performance of our quantum filter circuit, we used co- the diagonal polarizations is inverted; parallel inputs re- incidence measurements between the four threshold de- sulting in the superpositions of the orthogonal outputs tectors at D1, D2 and the two outputs, rather than using and vice versa.