1 Introduction

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1 Introduction Notes 1 Introduction 1. Neil Buckley and Theodor Troev, ‘Bulgaria PM to step down amid protests,’ Financial Times, 20 February 2013. 2. The keywords for the search were ‘energy’, ‘oil’, ‘gas’, ‘coal’, ‘wind’, ‘renew- able’, and ‘hydrogen’. The organizations that came up were the European Coal and Steel Community, the Central American Energy Commission, the European Atomic Energy Commission, the International Atomic Energy Agency, the International Energy Agency, the Latin American Energy Orga- nization, and the International Oil Pollution Compensation Funds. It is striking that the first three organizations mentioned had already ceased to exist in the early 1990s. To be fair, it should be noted that here are of course many other forms of governance beyond intergovernmental organi- zations in the field of energy, and that there are some non-energy-specific international organizations that are relevant for the energy sector. 3. Mohamed ElBaradei, ‘A global agency is needed for the energy crisis,’ Financial Times, 23 July 2008. 4. This proposal is available from: http://archive.kremlin.ru/eng/text/docs/ 2009/04/215305.shtml (Accessed: 19 October 2011). 5. See his speech at the 66th session of the United Nations General Assembly in New York in September 2011, available from: http://www.turkmenistan. gov.tm/_en/?idr=4&id=110924a (accessed 19 October 2011). 6. ‘China urges global energy cooperation,’ UPI, 16 January 2012. 7. I will also use these terms in a value-neutral fashion, which does not imply a positive bias toward institutional unity and centralization. For the sake of completeness it should be mentioned that still other terms are in use to describe this phenomenon such as ‘interlocking governance struc- tures’ (Underdal and Young 2004) and ‘institutional complexes’ (Stokke and Oberthür 2011). 8. Examples include: The Last Oil Shock: A Survival Guide to the Imminent Extinc- tion of Petroleum Man by David Strahan (2007), The Impending World Energy Mess by Robert Hirsch, Roger Bezdek, and Robert Wendling (2010), and The Long Emergency: Surviving the End of Oil, Climate Change, and Other Converging Catastrophes of the Twenty-First Century by James H. Kunstler (2005). 9. Interview with Claude Mandil, ‘Executive director of the IEA from 2003 to 2007,’ Paris, 9 March 2010. 10. Joseph Nye, ‘Scholars on the sidelines,’ The Washington Post, 13 April 2009. 11. Since some parts of this book draw on previously published articles, I thank the respective publishers and co-authors for allowing me to use these mate- rials. Chapter 5 was previously published as ‘Obsolete or resurgent? The International Energy Agency in a changing global landscape,’ Energy Policy, 167 168 Notes 48, 83–92. Chapter 6 was previously published as ‘Fragmentation in global energy governance: Explaining the creation of IRENA,’ Global Environmen- tal Politics, 13(3), 14–33, while Chapter 7 previously appeared as ‘The G8 and G20 as global steering committees for energy: Opportunities and constraints,’ Global Policy, 2(S1), 19–30 (co-authored with Kirsten Westphal). 2 Energy and Global Governance 1. Actually, the IEA identified a fourth trend, the persistent failure to provide universal energy access to the world’s poor. This is not discussed here, for it is not a trend but rather a constant. Energy poverty will be discussed later on in this chapter when the question is addressed of what is to be governed in global energy. 2. Press Release: New Energy Realities – WEO Calls for Global Energy Rev- olution Despite Economic Crisis. 12 November 2008. Available at: www. iea.org/textbase/press/pressdetail.asp?press_rel_id=275 [accessed: February 2013]. 3. These are often referred to as the four As, usually omitting the ‘reliability’ component. See, for example, Hughes and Shupe (2011). 4. Andres Schipani, ‘Bolivia: the Saudi Arabia of lithium?,’ Financial Times, 7 January 2013. 5. Stanley Reed, ‘North Africa’s prospects as energy goliath are fading,’ New York Times, 22 February 2013. 6. Ryan Chilcote, Anna Shiryaevskaya, and Lyubov Pronina, ‘Russia’s Medvedev says Gazprom may lose gas-export monopoly,’ Bloomberg,23 January 2013. 7. Joseph Menn, ‘Chinese hackers hit energy groups,’ Financial Times,11 February 2011. 8. Simeon Kerr, ‘Gulf oil industry at risk of cyber attack,’ Financial Times, 23 October 2012. 9. Ed Crooks, ‘Hackers target US natural gas pipelines,’ Financial Times, 8 May 2012. 10. Note that for (the governments of) oil and gas exporting countries, secu- rity of demand is the chief concern as they often rely overwhelmingly on hydrocarbon export revenues to balance their national budgets. 3 Morphogenesis of the Energy Regime Complex 1. For a more complete, but static snapshot of the global energy architecture, see Chapter 4 of Lesage et al. (2010). 2. This speech is available from: http://www.iaea.org/About/history_speech. html (accessed 11 March 2010). 3. OPEC Annual Statistical Bulletin, available through http://www.opec.org. The following countries joined OPEC in the 1960s–1970s: Qatar (1961), Indonesia (1962), Libya (1962), the United Arab Emirates (1967), Algeria (1969), Nigeria (1971), Ecuador (1973), and Gabon (1975). Notes 169 4. In principle, the ECT also covers other forms of energy. Yet, natural gas is the key issue on the Eurasian continent. The oil market is much more liquid and most oil transport takes place by ship, while natural gas trade on the continent is inevitably pipeline-bound. Coal is a separate case, as international trade in coal is relatively limited. 5. Interview with Claude Mandil, former Executive Director of the IEA, Paris, 9 March 2010. 6. Interview with William C. Ramsay, ‘IEA Deputy Executive Director from 1999 to 2008,’ Brussels, 6 May 2010. 7. Interview with William C. Ramsay, ‘IEA Deputy Executive Director from 1999 to 2008,’ Paris, 11 April 2008. 4 Interpreting the Global Energy Architecture 1. Keith Bradsher, ‘China Sharply Raises Energy Prices,’ New York Times, 20 June 2008. 2. IEA (2011) Electricity Information 2011. Paris: OECD/IEA. 3. Sonja Van Renssen (2011), ‘Public Acceptance: The Energy Sector’s Biggest Headache,’ European Energy Review, 16 June. 5 Adaptation at the Core: Reform of the IEA 1. http://www.iea.org/about/index.asp (last accessed: 9 February 2012). 2. See the special issue of Global Policy on global energy governance, issued in September 2011, for more detailed accounts of these structural transforma- tions in world energy (Florini and Dubash 2011). 3. Note that other fossil fuels such as natural gas and coal are also exhaustible, but here the depletion is less pressing than with oil, because reserves are relatively larger and there are more substitutes available. The same can be said with regard to uranium. 4. Figure is for October 2011. For more recent data, see: http://www.iea.org/ netimports.asp. 5. Personal interview with national official involved in IEA, 24 March 2010. 6. One metric to measure this is to look at how many times the IEA’s chief economist Fatih Birol has been cited in a leading international newspaper, the New York Times, since he took office in 1995. During his first five years (1995–1999) Birol is not mentioned or quoted even once. During the next five years (2000–2004) he is quoted seven times. This number increases to 24 in the next five-year period (2005–2010). The trend seems to continue as, for the year 2011 alone, Birol was cited nine times, the highest-ever mark for a single year. Source: own calculations based on the New York Times archive, accessed at: http://www.nytimes.com/ref/membercenter/nytarchive.html. 7. Ed Morse, ‘IEA Drawdown Marks Major Shift in Oil Price Policy,’ Financial Times, 23 June 2011. 8. Personal interview with William C. Ramsay, ‘Deputy Executive Director of the IEA from 1999 to 2008,’ Brussels, 24 March 2009. 170 Notes 9. David Adam, ‘International Energy Agency Blocking Global Switch to Renewables,’ Guardian, 8 January 2009. 10. Terry Macalister, ‘Key Oil Figures Were Distorted by US Pressure, Says Whistleblower,’ Guardian, 9 November 2009. 11. The partner countries are Brazil, China, India, Indonesia, Mexico, Russia, and the Republic of South Africa, with Chile and Estonia as candidate countries for accession. 12. This is also the current practice in other organizations in the OECD family, such as the International Transport Forum and the Nuclear Energy Agency, both of which have member countries that are not in the OECD. 13. Stefan Nicola, ‘A Solar Revolution at the IEA,’ European Energy Review,4June 2010. 6 Diverging from the Path: The Creation of IRENA 1. Another energy organization, the International Energy Forum (IEF), has a small secretariat in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, but compared to IRENA it is very weakly institutionalized and comprises fewer member states (about 89 in total). 2. For an overview of the history of international cooperation on renewable energy, see Rowlands (2005). 3. Unless stated otherwise, the following paragraphs are based on Eurosolar and Eurosolar and WCRE (2009). 4. Interview with William C. Ramsay, ‘Deputy Executive Director of the IEA from 1999 to 2008,’ Brussels, 24 March 2009. 5. Interview with member state representative #1, 26 April 2011. 6. Guardian, 28 June 2009. 7. Interview with member state representative #1. 8. Interview with member state representative #2, 15 October 2010. 9. Agence France Presse, 25 October 2010. 10. New York Times, 29 November 2010. 11. Interview with member state representative #1. 12. Annual report of the Interim Director-General to the fifth session of the Preparatory Commission for the International Renewable Energy Agency on the implementation of the 2010 Work Programme and Budget, available from: http://www.irena.org/documents/uploadDocuments/PC.5_2.pdf. 13. Interview with member state representative #1. 14. Interview with member state representative #2, 15 October 2010. 15. Interview member state representative #3, 26 April 2011.
Recommended publications
  • ROMAHDUS Vipu
    ROMAHDUS ViPu Lokakuu 2014 1 Sisällys Lukijalle……………………………………………………… 2 1 Mikä romahdus?…………………………………………… 2 2 Romahduksen lajeista……………………………………… 6 3 Romahduksen vaiheista…………………………………… 15 4 Teoreetikkoja ja näkemyksiä……………………………… 17 5 Romahdus—maailmanloppu, apokalypsi, kriisi, utopia… 25 6 Romahdus ja selviytyminen………………………………. 29 7 Pitääkö romahdusta jouduttaa?…………………………… 44 8 Romahdus, tieto ja hallinta………………………………… 49 9 Romahdus ja politiikka…………………………………….. 53 2 Lukijalle Tämä teksti on osa pohdiskelua, jonka tarkoituksena on luoda pohjaa Vihreän Puolueen poliittiselle toiminnalle. Tekstin aiheena on jo monin paikoin ja tavoin alkanut teollisten sivilisaatioiden ja modernismin kehityskertomuksen romahdus. Tekstin ensimmäiset 8 lukua käsittelevät erilaisia teorioita, käsityksiä ja vapaampaankin ajatuksenlentoon nojaavia näkökulmia romahdukseen. Ne eivät siis missään nimessä edusta ViPun poliittisia käsityksiä tai tavotteita, vaan pohjustavat alustavia poliittisia johtopäätöksiä, jotka esitetään luvussa 9. Toisin sanoen luvut 1-8 pyörittelevät aihetta suuntaan ja toiseen ja luku 9 esittää välitilinpäätöksen, jonka on edelleen tarkoitus tarkentua ja elää tilanteen mukaan. Tätä romahdus-osiota on myös tarkoitus lukea muiden ViPun teoreettisten tekstien kanssa, niiden ristivalotuksessa. 1 Mikä romahdus? Motto: "Yhden maailman loppu on toisen maailman alku, yhden maailmanloppu on toisen maailmanalku." Moton sanaleikin tarkoitus on huomauttaa, että vaikka yhteiskunnan romahdus onkin yksilön ja ryhmän näkökulmasta vääjäämätön tapahtuma, johon
    [Show full text]
  • The International Energy Agency Undermines Global Climate Protection and Energy Security in Its Latest World Energy Outlook
    The International Energy Agency undermines global climate protection and energy security in its latest World Energy Outlook Berlin, November 2016 The International Energy Agency’s call for new investments in fossil fuels, in particular oil and gas, in its latest World Energy Outlook (WEO) undermines the agency’s seemingly positive messages related to climate protection and the development of renewable energy, an analysis by the Energy Watch Group shows. The World Energy Outlook 2016, which was presented today in Berlin, calls for increased investment in oil and gas due to oil discoveries at lowest level in more than 60 years and low oil prices. The International Energy Agency (IEA) thereby disregards that the current low investment is in fact caused by the lack of new discoveries and the depletion of existing reserves. Moreover, higher oil prices will not be able to compensate for the lack of funding as cost reductions in the renewable energy sector increasingly challenge the competitiveness of oil and gas. „Even if oil prices were to rise again, future oil production will not stay at today’s level, simply because of the limited availability. By calling for increased investments in oil, the IEA undermines climate protection efforts and threatens the global energy security. Only a rapid development of renewable energies can close the emerging energy supply gap. Oil investments are not able to do so”, says President of the Energy Watch Group and former member of the German Parliament Hans-Josef Fell. “Even in its most optimistic scenario, the IEA projects the future level of development of renewable energies to be far below today´s rates.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 March 18, 2021 To
    March 18, 2021 To: Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen Secretary of State Anthony Blinken Secretary of Energy Jennifer Granholm Incoming President and Chairperson of the U.S. Export-Import Bank Acting CEO of the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation Dev Jagadesan Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs Jake Sullivan Special Assistant to the President for Economic Policy Robin Colwell [heads of other agencies and partner institutions, as appropriate] We are encouraged by the Biden Administration’s initial steps to implement a ‘whole-of-government’ approach to the climate crisis, as set out in the January 27 “Executive Order on Tackling the Climate Crisis at Home and Abroad.” We are writing now to provide our recommendations on a critical piece of the international agenda described in the Executive Order — ending public support for fossil fuels around the world by “promoting the flow of capital toward climate-aligned investments and away from high-carbon investments.” We urge the Biden Administration to act swiftly to end new financing for all parts of the fossil fuel supply chain (including for gas), stop new U.S. fossil fuel support within 90 days across all government institutions, and work with other nations to end fossil fuel financing.1 As you know, averting the worst impacts of the climate crisis requires a rapid transition away from fossil fuels. There is simply no room left for new investments in long-lived carbon intensive infrastructure. Still, public agencies continue to provide tens of billions of dollars to finance and support such investments each year. This has to stop.
    [Show full text]
  • Transition Towards a 100% Renewable Energy System by 2050 for Ukraine 2 Michael Childź [email protected] Agenda
    TRANSITION TOWARDS A 100% RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEM BY 2050 FOR UKRAINE Michael Child, Dmitrii Bogdanov and Christian Breyer Lappeenranta University of Technology, Finland Hans-Josef Fell, Komila Nabiyeva Energy Watch Group, Germany Yuliia Oharenko, Oksana Aliieva Heinrich Böll Foundation Kiev, Ukraine NeoCarbon Energy 7th Researchers’ Seminar, January 24-25, 2017 Highlights ¾ A 100% renewable energy systems can provide reliable, sustainable energy services before 2050 ¾ A 100% renewable energy system is lower in cost than the current system based on nuclear and fossil fuels ¾ A well-designed 100% renewable energy system with energy storage solutions can provide power system stability, baseload power, and peak following power in all 8760 hours of the year Transition towards a 100% renewable energy system by 2050 for Ukraine 2 Michael ChildŹ [email protected] Agenda Motivation Methodology and Data Results Summary Transition towards a 100% renewable energy system by 2050 for Ukraine 3 Michael ChildŹ [email protected] Motivation ¾ COP21 set out a framework for action aimed at stabilising global GHGs ¾ Past Ukrainian reductions are due to drops in population, GDP and living standards ¾ Improvements will result in increased Total estimated installed capacities (net) in 2015 in Ukraine. energy use, especially electricity ¾ Improvements must be made in a sustainable manner ¾ What could the transition pathway to a 100% RE power system by 2050 look like for Ukraine? Total projected installed capacities (net) in 2050 in Ukraine based on
    [Show full text]
  • International Energy Agency Still Gets Its World Energy Outlook Wrong
    Energy Watch Group c/o DWR eco GmbH Albrechtstr. 22 10117 Berlin +49 (30) 609898810 [email protected] www.energywatchgroup.org International Energy Agency still gets its World Energy Outlook wrong The International Energy Agency (IEA) has been heavily underestimating the potential growth of renewable energy sources and overestimating the utilization possibilities of fossil and nuclear energy. The Energy Watch Group (EWG) and Lappeenranta University of Technology (LUT), have documented and analyzed the long history of IEA’s misleading and false projections on the renewable energy development. On November 14, the IEA presented its flagship report, the “World Energy Outlook 2017” (WEO). In a new analysis of the World Energy Outlook 2017 by the EWG, LUT together with Association for the Study of Peak Oil and Gas Germany have looked closely into the misleading projections of the IEA on solar energy and oil production. Solar Energy: Although the IEA revised its extremely pessimistic forecast on renewable energy, following a wave of international critique, is it consistently ignoring their exponential growth over the last years. Especially growth rates of solar PV are underestimated. The IEA estimated annual installations of PV from 2018 till 2030 constantly below 80 GW, even tough the past years have displayed consistent growth, showing that by 2017 annual installations of 100 GW are expected. Crude Oil: Regarding oil production, the IEA still propagates the projection that by 2040 oil consumption can surpass the peak value of 2015, which accounted 92,7 Mboe/d, by more than 100 Mboe/d. Taking a closer look at the results and facts in the WEO 2017 “new policy scenario”, one might be surprised that the euphoria, which the IEA has spread regarding the availability of crude oil, cannot not be found and verified in their own detailed analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Peak Oil Task Force Final Report
    0 Solutions to Peak Oil Vulnerabilities: A Response Plan for Lawrence, Kansas The Lawrence Mayor’s Peak Oil Task Force September 29, 2011 1 Table of Contents Situation Analysis . 2 Overview of Recommendations and Implementation Strategies . 6 Transportation: Vulnerabilities and Top Solutions . 11 Food: Vulnerabilities and Top Solutions . 15 Energy Delivery: Vulnerabilities and Top Solutions . .. 20 Water, Wastewater, and Solid Waste: Vulnerabilities and Top Solutions . 25 Communications Plan: Vulnerabilities and Top Solutions . 29 Appendix A: Local Emergency Operations Plans . 31 Appendix B: Transportation Recommendations . 33 Appendix C: Food Recommendations . 42 Appendix D: Energy Delivery Recommendations . 45 Appendix E: Water, Wastewater, and Solid Waste Recommendations. 49 Appendix F: Communications Recommendations . 52 2 SITUATION ANALYSIS Peak oil does not mean the end of oil, but the end of cheap oil. Peak oil will have a costly inflationary effect on all aspects of our industrial society, including portable liquid fuels, agriculture (including planting, fertilizing, and harvesting), oil-dependent delivery of other energy sources, asphalt pavement, plastics, hydraulics and lubrication, and building materials. In 2006, the United States Department of Energy (DOE) defined “peak oil” as “the theory that the world’s oil production rate will reach a maximum and then decline.” In an accompanying report, the DOE quoted petroleum geologist Colin J. Campbell and petroleum engineer Jean H. Laherrere, who concluded that “[t]he world is not running out of oil--at least not yet. What our society does face, and soon, is the end of the abundant and cheap oil on which all industrial nations depend.”1 In 2007, the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Allianz Energy Factsheets
    Allianz SE | Group ESG Office Allianz Climate Solutions GmbH Energy Factsheets 2015 Executive Summary The energy sector is an important driver and engine of the world economy. Due to the sector’s importance, Allianz Group is directly and indirectly involved with various aspects of the global energy system as an investor, insurer, business partner and global corporate citizen. Allianz is aware that the energy sector faces several significant risks, including environmental pollution issues, its significant contribution to climate change and its high dependency on finite fossil resources. While it remains in the foremost responsibility of energy sector companies and regulators to address these risks, Allianz acknowledges the responsibility it has as a financial services provider to work together with our clients and stakeholders to address and manage material Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) risks and opportunities that are associated with today’s energy sector. The Allianz Energy Factsheets provide a factual overview of the key trends and associated ESG issues along the value chain of eight key energy sources (coal, natural gas, oil and oil products, nuclear energy, hydropower, wind, solar and bioenergy). This documentation is part of the overall Allianz Energy Framework and was used as the basis to inform and design Allianz’ actions in the energy sector. Chapter 1 gives an overview of the overall energy sector, explaining the different energy uses and displaying energy flows with figures for total energy production and consumption
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond Borders How to Strengthen the External Impact of Domestic Climate Action
    BEYOND BORDERS HOW TO STRENGTHEN THE EXTERNAL IMPACT OF DOMESTIC CLIMATE ACTION September 2020 Climate Analytics Ritterstraße 3 10969 Berlin www.climateanalytics.org BEYOND BORDERS HOW TO STRENGTHEN THE EXTERNAL IMPACT OF DOMESTIC CLIMATE ACTION Authors: Andrzej Ancygier, Climate Analytics Critical review: Damon Jones, Climate Analytics The contents of this report are based on research conducted in the framework of the project “Implikationen des Pariser Klimaschutzabkommens auf nationale Klimaschutzanstrengungen”, conducted on behalf of the German Federal Environment Agency, FKZ 3717 41 102 0 The views expressed in this paper are strictly those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the German Federal Environment Agency, nor of the German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety. Cover photo: Cozine / Shutterstock.com. Ripple wave surface. Copying or distribution with credit to the source. Beyond borders: How to strengthen the external impact of domestic climate action Table of content The spillover effect of domestic action. .............................................................................. 2 Mechanism 1: Policy diffusion ........................................................................................... 4 Driver 1. Making policy learning easier ...................................................................................... 5 Driver 2: Facilitating emulation by shifting international norms ................................................. 5 Driver 3:
    [Show full text]
  • Global-100-RE-Strategy-Group-Bios-210209.Pdf
    Prof. Andrew Blakers Andrew Blakers is Professor of Engineering at the Australian National University. He founded the solar PV research group at ANU in 1991. In the 1980s and 1990s he was responsible for the design and fabrication of silicon solar cells with world record efficiencies of 18%, 19%, 20% and 22%. He was co-inventor of Sliver solar cell technology, the subject of a $240 million comMercialisation effort by Transform Solar. He was co-inventor of the PERC silicon solar cell, which has ¾ of the global solar market and cumulative module sales of US$50 billion. PERC cell deployment is mitigating 0.6% of global Greenhouse gas eMissions through displaceMent of coal. Prof Blakers engages in detailed hour-by-hour analysis of energy systeMs with 50-100% penetration by wind and photovoltaics for which he was co-winner of the 2018 Eureka Prize for Environmental Research. Prof Blakers’ teaM developed a comprehensive global atlas of off-river pumped hydro energy storage sites. Further Reading: Home page: http://re100.eng.anu.edu.au/ A zero-carbon, reliable and affordable energy future in Australia", http://arxiv.org/abs/2007.09586 Pathway to 100% Renewable Electricity: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8836526 100% renewable electricity in Australia: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544217309568 Geographic information systeM algorithms to locate prospective sites for pumped hydro energy storage’, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261918305270 WA analysis: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544217300774 Christian Breyer, PhD (Tech), Professor for Solar Economy • Christian Breyer is Professor for Solar Economy at LUT University, Finland.
    [Show full text]
  • China's Coal-Fired Electricity Generation, 1990-2025
    LBNL-2334E ERNEST ORLANDO LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY China’s Coal: Demand, Constraints, and Externalities Nathaniel Aden, David Fridley, Nina Zheng Environmental Energy Technologies Division July 2009 This work was supported by the Dow Chemical Company through the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231. Disclaimer This document was prepared as an account of work sponsored by the United States Government. While this document is believed to contain correct information, neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor The Regents of the University of California, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by its trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof, or The Regents of the University of California. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof, or The Regents of the University of California. Ernest Orlando Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory is an equal opportunity employer. China’s Coal Industry: Resources, Constraints, and Externalities
    [Show full text]
  • Companies in Transition Towards 100% Renewables: Focus on Heating and Cooling, International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi
    COMPANIES IN TRANSITION TOWARDS 100% RENEWABLES: FOCUS ON HEATING AND COOLING About the Coalition The IRENA Coalition for Action brings together leading renewable energy players from around the world with the common goal of advancing the uptake of renewable energy. The Coalition facilitates global dialogues between public and private sectors to develop actions to increase the share of renewables in the global energy mix and accelerate the global energy transition. About this paper This white paper has been developed jointly by members of the Coalition’s Working Group on Towards 100% Renewable Energy. Building on several case studies and first-hand interviews with companies, the paper showcases the opportunities and challenges experienced by companies in the industrial sector that have a target for 100% renewable electricity supply, and a meaningful and/or ambitious target or activities to increase the share of renewable energy in their heating and cooling operations. Acknowledgements Contributing authors: Rainer Hinrichs-Rahlwes (European Renewable Energies Federation), David Renné (International Solar Energy Society), Charlotte Hornung (former Energy Watch Group), Namiz Musafer (Integrated Development Association), Duncan Gibb and Chetna Hareesh Kumar (REN21), Aleksandra Mirowicz (The Climate Group), Stephanie Weckend, Emma Åberg, Kelly Tai and Anindya Bhagirath under the supervision of Rabia Ferroukhi (IRENA). Further acknowledgements: Valuable feedback and review were provided by Constantinos Peonides (Alectris), Britta Schaffmeister
    [Show full text]
  • Scientists Say That We Face a Climate Emergency. We Need Decisive
    Scientists say that we face a climate emergency. We need decisive action in the next 10 years to put us on a transformative pathway in line with the targets of the Paris Agreement, including efforts to limit temperature rise to 1.5°C. We must act immediately to get on track for a healthy, fair and liveable future. This will not only reduce devastating impacts of climate change but also bring major economic and social benefits, attract new investments, create new quality jobs and limit health damages. The European Parliament elections and subsequent changes in the leadership of the European Commission will shape the politics of the European Union for the next five years, a crucial period for climate action where emissions need to decline fast, targets need to be strengthened and ambitious action needs to be implemented. The new Parliament and the new Commission must address growing concerns about climate change and make climate action a top priority for Europe. Therefore, we call upon the new European Parliament, the new European Commission and all EU Member State governments to: 1. Commit to accelerate actions to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 2030 and reach net zero emissions as soon as possible. The world is not on track to keep temperature rise to 1.5°C. We support the call from United Nations Secretary General ​António Guterres​, upon all leaders to come to his special UN Climate Summit in September with additional commitments that will lead to halving global emissions by 2030 and achieving net zero by 2050. By the Summit, EU leaders ​should agree ​to reach climate neutrality in line with the EU’s fair share of the effort to achieve net zero global emissions by 2050.
    [Show full text]