DOCSLIB.ORG

Secondary School Students' University Readiness and Their Transition to University Van Rooij, Els

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Secondary School Students' University Readiness and Their Transition to University Van Rooij, Els University of Groningen Secondary school students' university readiness and their transition to university van Rooij, Els IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2018 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): van Rooij, E. (2018). Secondary school students' university readiness and their transition to university. University of Groningen. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). The publication may also be distributed here under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the “Taverne” license. More information can be found on the University of Groningen website: https://www.rug.nl/library/open-access/self-archiving-pure/taverne- amendment. Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 08-10-2021 Secondary school students’ university readiness and their transition to university Els Cornelia Maria van Rooij 48103 Els van Rooij.indd 1 18-01-18 14:28 The research in this thesis was conducted at the research division Higher Education of the department of Teacher Education at the University of Groningen. The PhD programme was embedded in the Interuniversity Center for Educational Sciences (ICO). ISBN 978-94-034-0416-5 (printed version) ISBN 978-94-034-0415-8 (electronic version) Cover design: Majken Enequist, www.majkenenequist.com Layout: Ferdinand van Nispen, Citroenvlinder DTP&Vormgeving, www.my-thesis.nl Printing: GVO Drukkers & Vormgevers, www.proefschriften.nl 48103 Els van Rooij.indd 2 18-01-18 14:28 Secondary school students’ university readiness and their transition to university Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Rijksuniversiteit Groningen op gezag van de rector magnificus prof. dr. E. Sterken en volgens besluit van het College voor Promoties. De openbare verdediging zal plaatsvinden op donderdag 15 maart 2018 om 14.30 uur door Els Cornelia Maria van Rooij geboren op 14 maart 1987 te Deurne 48103 Els van Rooij.indd 3 18-01-18 14:28 Promotor Prof. dr. W.J.C.M. van de Grift Copromotor Dr. E.P.W.A. Jansen Beoordelingscommissie Prof. dr. W.H.A. Hofman (Rijksuniversiteit Groningen) Prof. dr. S.E. Severiens (Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam) Prof. dr. K. van Veen (Rijksuniversiteit Groningen) 48103 Els van Rooij.indd 4 18-01-18 14:28 48103 Els van Rooij.indd 5 18-01-18 14:28 48103 Els van Rooij.indd 6 18-01-18 14:28 Contents Chapter 1 Introduction 9 Chapter 2 Method 39 Chapter 3 A systematic review of factors related to first-year students’ 51 success in higher education Chapter 4 Factors that contribute to secondary school students’ self- 103 efficacy in being a successful university student Chapter 5 The relationship between secondary school students’ 125 engagement profiles and the transition to university Chapter 6 Secondary school teachers’ beliefs and practices regarding 155 university preparation Chapter 7 Academic adjustment as a pivotal process in the transition 179 from secondary education to university Chapter 8 Conclusion and discussion 201 References 247 Appendices 267 I. Samenvatting 268 II Vragenlijsten 286 III Interviewprotocol 301 IV Acknowledgements 304 V About the author 310 VI List of publications, presentations, and activities 312 48103 Els van Rooij.indd 7 23-01-18 09:49 48103 Els van Rooij.indd 8 18-01-18 14:28 CHAPTER 1 Introduction 48103 Els van Rooij.indd 9 18-01-18 14:28 “For me, university is like a big black hole. I’ll just jump in and see what happens.” Grade 12 secondary school student 48103 Els van Rooij.indd 10 18-01-18 14:28 Introduction 1.1 Introduction Are students who graduated from secondary education ready for university? More 1 specifically, are they ready to adjust academically? Many of the 47,316 students who started their university studies in the Netherlands in September 2016 (VSNU, 2017a) have probably not given this question much thought. Going to university is an exciting new phase in life, with all the adventures that come with it, especially for students who move out of their parents’ house and start to live on their own in a new city. However, many students do not know what to expect or have unrealistic expectations about university in general (Heublein et al., 2017; Smith & Wertlieb, 2005) or about the specific degree programme they have chosen to pursue (De Buck, 2009). Even despite the lack of (accurate) expectations, the transition from secondary education to university may turn out quite well if the student finds himself or herself fit in perfectly into the new environment. However, for a substantial number of students this is not the case. In the Netherlands, 33% of all first-year students in the academic year 2014/2015 did not continue in the same degree programme they had started: 7% left university altogether and 26% switched programmes (Inspectorate of Education, 2017). Apart from the negative consequences this has for universities regarding costs and success rates, it could also have negative psychological and financial effects on the student, e.g., the feeling of failure and the loss of money on an unfinished study programme. Moreover, the number of students who do not cope with the transition effectively is probably a lot higher than these dropout rates suggest, since not all students who have a difficult time will quit or switch. In a sample of first-year students at a university in the United Kingdom, Lowe and Cook (2003) found that one out of four to one out of three students faced considerable difficulties in adjusting to postsecondary education. These adjustment difficulties may cause academic problems, such as underachievement, and psychological problems, like depression (Leung, 2017; Lowe & Cook, 2003). Besides the mismatch between expectations and reality, there are several other reasons for dropping out, switching programmes, and going through a difficult stage in life during the transition to university. An important reason concerns the difference between the heavily regulated secondary school learning environment and the university environment that makes a strong appeal to a student’s self-regulation capacities, in combination with a significant increase in the amount and complexity of study content. A lot of research into first-year 11 48103 Els van Rooij.indd 11 18-01-18 14:28 Chapter 1 success confirmed that a substantial number of students struggle with time management and self-regulation, especially in the first semester (e.g., Haggis, 2006; Van der Meer, Jansen, & Torenbeek, 2010). Even for highly able students the required self-regulation and time management skills can be problematic, because many of them went through secondary school without having to exert much effort and therefore never felt the need to learn how to learn (Balduf, 2009; Grobman, 2006). Wintre et al. (2011) reported that as many as half of all university students obtained a lower GPA in university than they did in secondary school. Fortunately, improving university students’ success is a primary concern of the Dutch government and of the universities and thus receives a lot of attention. Measures that have been taken to improve retention and decrease delay include ‘matching’, the binding study advice (BSA), and the incorporation of learning communities in first-year programmes. Matching (sometimes referred to as the study choice check) is a procedure with the goal of obtaining an optimal fit between the student’s capacities and interests and a degree programme. Moreover, it aims to make sure the student has realistic expectations of the programme he or she plans to pursue. Matching is mandatory: Once a student applies for a degree programme, he or she has to undergo the matching procedure. Universities are free to choose what matching activities they offer, which has the consequence that these activities vary from having students complete a short questionnaire or participate in an intake interview to having students take part in a class and in some cases even take a test to see to what extent the student is able to handle the content of that class. Results of the matching procedure are informative only and do not deny a student access to the degree programme. As such, matching does not serve as a selection mechanism for institutes, but intends to function as a self-selection mechanism by showing students to what extent a programme suits them. The BSA refers to a binding advice the student receives after one year of study. This advice can be positive or negative. In the latter case, a student is not allowed to continue the programme. A student receives a negative BSA when he or she does not obtain a certain minimum of credit points after one year of study. Programmes can decide upon their own threshold. For many programmes, the minimum number of credits required is 45 (out of 60), but in some programmes it is as high as 60. Preliminary research showed different effects of the BSA on student success. Arnold (2015) found that in large degree programmes the BSA had a positive effect on time-to-degree, but De Koning, Loyens, Rikers, Smeets, and Van der Molen (2014) found no differences in achievement between a BSA cohort 12 48103 Els van Rooij.indd 12 18-01-18 14:28 Introduction and a pre-BSA cohort.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • History of Adult and Continuing Education
    History of Adult and Continuing Education The Adult and Continuing Education function has been central to the mission of the college since its founding in 1966. Originally it was one of three major college focal points along with vocational-technical education and student services. The department’s mission is consistent with several of the directives in SF550, the law that created the community college system in Iowa in 1966: Programs for in-service training and retraining of workers; Developmental education for persons academically or personally underprepared to succeed in their program of study; Programs for training, retraining, and preparation for productive employment of all citizens; and Programs for high school completion for students of post-high school age. The 1968 North Central Association Self Study prepared constructive notes as a first step toward regional accreditation on these major functions of the department: Adult and Continuing Education provided educational programs in four areas: adult basic education, adult high school diploma programs, high school equivalency programs, and general adult education. Adult basic education programs developed throughout the area provided instruction to adults with less than an eighth grade education. Adult high school diploma programs provided instruction to adults with a 10th grade education but less than a high school education. Students enrolled in these programs were working toward the completion of a high school program and the receipt of a diploma from an established secondary school within the area. High school equivalency programs provided instruction to students who had completed at least eighth grade, and by completing additional course work, could be granted a high school equivalency certificate by the Iowa State Department of Public Instruction.
    [Show full text]
  • EDUCATION in CHINA a Snapshot This Work Is Published Under the Responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD
    EDUCATION IN CHINA A Snapshot This work is published under the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views of OECD member countries. This document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. Photo credits: Cover: © EQRoy / Shutterstock.com; © iStock.com/iPandastudio; © astudio / Shutterstock.com Inside: © iStock.com/iPandastudio; © li jianbing / Shutterstock.com; © tangxn / Shutterstock.com; © chuyuss / Shutterstock.com; © astudio / Shutterstock.com; © Frame China / Shutterstock.com © OECD 2016 You can copy, download or print OECD content for your own use, and you can include excerpts from OECD publications, databases and multimedia products in your own documents, presentations, blogs, websites and teaching materials, provided that suitable acknowledgement of OECD as source and copyright owner is given. All requests for public or commercial use and translation rights should be submitted to [email protected]. Requests for permission to photocopy portions of this material for public or commercial use shall be addressed directly to the Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) at [email protected] or the Centre français d’exploitation du droit de copie (CFC) at [email protected]. Education in China A SNAPSHOT Foreword In 2015, three economies in China participated in the OECD Programme for International Student Assessment, or PISA, for the first time: Beijing, a municipality, Jiangsu, a province on the eastern coast of the country, and Guangdong, a southern coastal province.
    [Show full text]
  • Secondary School Course Classification System: School Codes for the Exchange of Data (SCED) (NCES 2007-341)
    Secondary School Course Classification U.S. Department of Education NCES 2007-341 System: School Codes for the Exchange of Data (SCED) Secondary School Course Classification System: School U.S. Department of Education Codes for the NCES 2007-341 Exchange of Data (SCED) June 2007 Denise Bradby Rosio Pedroso MPR Associates, Inc. Andy Rogers Consultant Quality Information Partners Lee Hoffman Project Officer National Center for Education Statistics U.S. Department of Education Margaret Spellings Secretary Institute of Education Sciences Grover J. Whitehurst Director National Center for Education Statistics Mark Schneider Commissioner The National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) is the primary federal entity for collecting, analyzing, and reporting data related to education in the United States and other nations. It fulfills a congressional mandate to collect, collate, analyze, and report full and complete statistics on the condition of education in the United States; conduct and publish reports and specialized analyses of the meaning and significance of such statistics; assist state and local education agencies in improving their statistical systems; and review and report on education activities in foreign countries. NCES activities are designed to address high-priority education data needs; provide consistent, reliable, complete, and accurate indicators of education status and trends; and report timely, useful, and high-quality data to the U.S. Department of Education, the Congress, the states, other education policymakers, practitioners, data users, and the general public. Unless specifically noted, all information contained herein is in the public domain. We strive to make our products available in a variety of formats and in language that is appropriate to a variety of audiences.
    [Show full text]
  • English Language Learning (ELL) Support
    Welcome to British Columbia Education is vital to a healthy and successful life in Canada. In British Columbia, all children between the ages of 5 and 16 must go to school. Most children go to public school; some children go to independent (private) schools. Children usually attend the public school closest to their home. After secondary school, students can go on to postsecondary study at colleges, technical schools, and universities. British Columbia’s Education System In British Columbia (BC), the school system is made up of public schools and independent (private schools). Public schools are fully funded by the provincial government. Independent schools are only partially funded by government. Both the provincial government and local boards of education manage the public school system (Kindergarten to Grade 12). The provincial government funds the school system and sets the legislation, regulations, and policies to ensure every school meets provincial standards and every student receives a high-quality education. For more information about BC’s Ministry of Education, visit the website at: www.gov.bc.ca/bced For more information about your child’s education in BC, contact your local Welcome Centre or school. Registration Your Refugee Assistance Provider (RAP) or local sponsor will be able to help you register your child(ren) for school. The school will be able to provide information about learning assistance, and English Language Learning (ELL) support. Some public schools also have settlement workers, from the Settlement Workers in Schools (SWIS) Program, who will help you and your children settle into your new school and community. Elementary, Middle and Secondary Schools Children usually start elementary school in the same year that they turn five years old.
    [Show full text]
  • Secondary School Transcript Request
    Secondary School Transcript Request SecondarySecondarySecondary School School School Transcript Transcript Transcript Request Request Request Secondary School Transcript Request Please fill in the Applicant Section below and give this form to your secondary school Please fill in the Applicant Section below and give this form to your secondary school Please fill in the Applicant Section below and give this form to your secondary school counselor.PleasePlease fill Be in fillsure the in to theApplicant give Applicant your Section counselor Section below timebelow and to giveandfill thisgiveout thisformthis formform to your tobefore yoursecondary the secondary due schooldate. school Due Dates (Postmark) counselor. Be sure to give your counselor time to fill out this form before the due date. Due Dates (Postmark) Due Dates (Postmark) Due DueDates Dates (Postmark) (Postmark) counselor. Be sure to give your counselor time to fill out this form before the due date. Aftercounselor. completingcounselor. Be sure Bethe sureto form, give to giveyour your counselor counselor shouldtime timeto sendfill to outitfill to: thisout formthis form before before the duethe date.due date.Early Decision Plan November 15 After completing the form, your counselor should send it to: Early Decision Plan November 15 After completing the form, your counselor should send it to: Early Decision Plan November 15 AfterAfter completing completing the form, the form, your yourcounselor counselor should should send sendit to: it to: RegularEarlyEarly DecisionDecision Decision
    [Show full text]
  • Including Children with Disabilities in State Pre-K Programs
    Education Law Center Pre-K Policy Brief Series INCLUDING CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES IN STATE PRE-K PROGRMS February 2010 September 2009 States and local school districts are required by federal law to educate preschool age children with disabilities in typical early childhood programs alongside children who do not have disabilities to the maximum extent appropriate. This policy brief provides an overview of the law and sets forth a list of policy recommendations that can help ensure that children with disabilities receive an appropriate public education in the least restrictive environment. It is intended to serve as a resource for policy makers and advocates seeking to increase inclusion in state funded pre-k programs. The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) The requirement to include children with disabilities in pre-k classrooms side-by- side with their typically developing peers is found in Summary of State Policy Recommendations federal laws and regulations, Create and Disseminate an Explicit Policy of as well as many state laws. Inclusivity The most important of these Provide Appropriate Teacher Training and Support Provide Support and Assistance to Schools, and the focus of this policy Families, and Communities brief is the federal Individuals Make Disability an Eligibility Factor for Targeted Programs with Disabilities Education Act Encourage Braiding and Blending of Funding (IDEA). IDEA provides federal Streams Support the Construction of Accessible Facilities funding to states to meet the and the Use of Adaptive Modifications educational needs of children Facilitate Communication and Coordination Between State and Local Agencies with disabilities. In exchange, Create Curricula and Guidelines That Promote states agree to comply with Inclusive Practices Education Law Center | Standing Up for Public School Children 1 IDEA’s substantive and procedural requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • KCPS Signature and Secondary School Reviews Final Report to Board of Directors
    BLUEPRINT 2030 ADVISORY TEAM Meeting #2 5/14/20 1 PURPOSE • Review/discuss findings of internal & 3rd party assessment reports • Connect data/findings from reports to recurring themes and topics • Begin to identify areas to address during goal- setting for 2030 2 AGENDA 4:00 - 4:05pm Welcome/Review Purpose & Agenda 4:05 - 4:10pm BP2030 Advisory Team Debrief/Key Takeaways 4:10 - 4:30pm Internal Assessment Reports Review SY19 System Analysis Updated Findings Transfer Analysis Middle School Perceptions Survey 4:30 -5:15pm Hanover Research & Mass Insight Key Findings/Recommendations Review 5:15- 5:20pm Next Steps 5:20- 6:00pm Break-out Group Discussions 3 BP2030 ADVISORY TEAM DEBRIEF 4 BP2030 ADVISORY TEAM DEBRIEF 5 BP2030 ADVISORY TEAM DEBRIEF 6 BP2030 ADVISORY TEAM DEBRIEF 7 INTERNAL ASSESSMENT REPORTS Today’s highlights: . SY19 System Analysis Update . Transfer Analysis . Middle School Perception Survey Next board meeting highlights: . Enrollment Projections . Utilization Study . Facilities Assessment . Inefficiencies Assessment . Human Capital Assessment 8 INTERNAL ASSESSMENT REPORTS http://www.kcpsbp2030.com/ 9 SY19 SYSTEM ANALYSIS REPORT KEY FINDINGS Long-range 2040 population forecasts by MARC show further population loss in the census tracts where the majority of current KCPS students live (which could result in further enrollment decline) Charter K-8 enrollment is now higher than KCPS KCPS/charter system has retention challenges (system serves 51% fewer students at 12th grade than at Kindergarten) Only 50% of KCPS/charter students
    [Show full text]
  • Optimal Scheduling for Secondary School Students
    Optimal Scheduling for Secondary School Students February 2014 In the following report, Hanover Research presents findings from available literature about the characteristics, advantages, and disadvantages of various secondary school scheduling models. The report concludes with a discussion about how to implement a different scheduling model based on identified best practices and an illustrative profile of one school district’s transition to a block scheduling model. Hanover Research | February 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ........................................................................................................... 3 KEY FINDINGS ............................................................................................................................. 3 Section I: Scheduling Model Characteristics ....................................................................... 4 SCHEDULING MODELS AND THEIR CHARACTERISTICS ........................................................................... 4 Traditional or Period Schedule .......................................................................................... 4 4x4 or Semester Block Schedule ........................................................................................ 4 A/B, or Alternating, Block Schedule ................................................................................... 5 Trimester Block Schedule .................................................................................................. 6 75‐75‐30 Block Schedule ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Secondary Education in Oecd Countries Common Challenges, Differing Solutions
    SECONDARY EDUCATION IN OECD COUNTRIES COMMON CHALLENGES, DIFFERING SOLUTIONS SECONDARY EDUCATION IN OECD COUNTRIES Common challenges, differing solutions Pasi Sahlberg, Ph.D., European Training Foundation Prepared for “Seminário Internacional sobre Ensino Médio Diversificado” , Brasilia, Brazil, 17 Sept, 2007 © European Training Foundation, 2007. Reproduction is authorised, provided the source is acknowledged, except for commercial purposes. 1 Executive summary Demand for secondary education is on the increase worldwide. More young people complete primary schooling and an increasing number seek opportunities to continue learning in secondary schools. Modern economies and their labour markets need people with sophisticated knowledge, skills and competences that cannot be developed only in primary school or in low-quality secondary schools. Therefore secondary education has an important role in the development of education around the world. In most developed countries today approximately 90% of the lower secondary school leaving age cohort enrol in upper secondary education. The ratio of upper secondary graduates to the population at the typical age of graduation in these countries is over 70%. Most students study in programmes that provide access to tertiary education. However, this doesn’t mean that all these students study in general secondary schools. In about half of the OECD countries the majority of upper secondary students attend vocational or apprenticeship programmes that also lead to a professional qualification. Many of these programmes also offer access to tertiary education. Today, 53% of young people in OECD countries will enter tertiary-type A programmes and about 16% tertiary-type B programmes during their lifetime. On average across OECD countries 42% of the adult population have only completed upper secondary education.
    [Show full text]
  • Merrimack Application Secondary School Report
    Secondary School Report Please complete applicant information below and submit to your secondary school counselor or another school official who knows you better. The designated school official must complete all questions in the academics and evaluation sec- tion and return the signed form to the Office of Admission. APPLICANT INFORMATION: Applicant Name: Date of Birth: School You Now Attend: CEEB/ACT Code: TO SCHOOL COUNSELOR OR SCHOOL OFFICIAL: The student listed above is applying for admission to Merrimack College. We appreciate your assistance in providing the information requested below. This form is intended to serve as a review of academic and disciplinary standing. This form, when completed, should be sent directly to the Office of Admission. Official Name/Title: School: Email/Phone: ACADEMICS Cumulative GPA: _____ on a _____ scale, covering a period from (mm/yyyy) _____ to _____ [_] Weighted [_] Unweighted The school’s passing mark is: _____ Expected graduation date: (mm/dd/yyyy) EVALUATION 1. Has applicant been found responsible for a disciplinary violation at your school? [_] Yes [_] No [_] Unable to Answer 2. Has applicant been adjudicated guilty or convicted of a misdemeanor or felony? [_] Yes [_] No [_] Unable to Answer 3. In comparison to other college preparatory students at your school, the applicant’s course selection is: [_] most demanding [_] very demanding [_] average demanding [_] less than demanding [_] prefer not to respond 4. Compared to other student is his/her class year, I would give this applicant an overall rating of: [_] one of the top few I’ve encountered [_] excellent [_] above average [_] average [_] below average 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Role of Technology in a Secondary School Social Studies Classroom
    Understanding the Role of Technology in a Secondary School Social Studies Classroom Jacob D. Gardner Summer 2011 Dr. Maina Master’s Thesis Project SUNY Oswego Abstract Recent research has shown that technology is extremely important when used in the classroom because it enhances student learning. It is imperative that teachers learn the best practices for use of technology in the classroom. Using interviews, questionnaires, and observations with social studies teachers in a rural school district in Central New York, the studies showed that there are issues of access to technology for both students and teachers. Technology is a tool, and is changing the role of the teacher. Teachers have little or no professional development in the use of technology in their classroom. It is also not clear what purpose technology should serve in the classroom. Introduction Technology plays a significant role in our society today. Most students, parents, and teachers use technology on a regular basis. There is no doubt that technology affects all aspects of our society. It also influences everything that we do on a daily basis. This also is true for the classroom environment. Teachers and students are consistently being introduced to new technologies. School districts are being pressured to buy even more technology and teachers are being pressured to use the technology. During my student teaching I was thrust into a classroom with a Smart Board and was asked to use it as part of my lesson planning. The teacher wanted to demonstrate to me the power of technology in the classroom. However, after all my preparation to be a teacher in my undergraduate education, I had never used a Smart Board.
    [Show full text]
  • School of Education College of Education and Human Studies
    SCHOOL OF EDUCATION COLLEGE OF EDUCATION AND HUMAN STUDIES Faculty Eric Marvin (2010). Associate Professor of Education. Ann Singleton (1985). Associate Dean of Education and B.A., Fresno Pacific University; Ed.D., M.Ed., Harding Professor of Special Education. B.S., Union University; University; Ed.D., University of Memphis. M.Ed. and Ed.D., University of Memphis. Stephen Marvin (2007). Assistant Professor of Education Jennifer Grove (1999). Assistant Dean of Graduate Studies and Director of M.Ed. Program—Germantown. B.A., in Education—Germantown and Associate Professor of Freson Pacific University; M.Ed., Harding University; Education. B.S. and M.Ed., Mississippi State University; Ed.D., University of Arkansas. Ed.D., University of Memphis. Melessia E. Mathis (1998). Assistant Professor of Dottie Myatt (1994). Assistant Dean for Teacher Education and Director of Clinical Experiences. B.S., Education and Accreditation and Professor of Education. University of Alabama; M.Ed., University of Memphis. B.S., Lambuth University; M.Ed., Union University; Dianne Morgan (2009). Associate Professor of Education. EDUCATION Ed.D., University of Memphis. Ph.D., University of Illinois Ubana-Champaign. Michele Atkins (1998-2005; 2006). Professor of Kenneth Newman (2001). Professor of Educational Education. B.S., Union University; M.Ed. and Ph.D., Leadership. B.A., Union University; M.Ed., M.A., and Ed.D., University of Memphis. University of Memphis. Nancy Cherry (2005). Associate Professor of Education Ben Phillips (2010). Associate Professor of Educational and Director of Master Programs in Education—Jackson. Leadership and Director of the Ed.S. and Ed.D.–P12 B.S., Union University; M.Ed., University of Memphis; Programs—Jackson.
    [Show full text]