DOCSLIB.ORG

The Place of the Hoplocarida in the Malacostracan Pantheon

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Marine Sciences Faculty Scholarship School of Marine Sciences 6-1-2009 The lP ace of the Hoplocarida in the Malacostracan Pantheon Les Watling University of Maine - Main, [email protected] C. H.J. Hof F. R. Schram Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/sms_facpub Repository Citation Watling, Les; Hof, C. H.J.; and Schram, F. R., "The lP ace of the Hoplocarida in the Malacostracan Pantheon" (2009). Marine Sciences Faculty Scholarship. 134. https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/sms_facpub/134 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Marine Sciences Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. JOURNALOF CRUSTACEANBIOLOGY, 20, SPECIALNUMBER 2: 1-11, 2000 THE PLACE OF THE HOPLOCARIDA IN THE MALACOSTRACAN PANTHEON Les Watling, Cees H. J. Hof, and Frederick R. Schram (LW,corresponding) Darling MarineCenter, University of Maine, Walpole, Maine 04573, U.S.A. (e-mail: [email protected]);(CHJH) Department of EarthSciences, University of Bristol, Wills MemorialBuilding, Queens Road, Bristol BS8 1RJ, United Kingdom (e-mail: [email protected]); (FRS) Zoological Museum, University of Amsterdam,Post Box 94766, NL-1090 GT Amsterdam, The Netherlands(e-mail: [email protected]) ABSTRACT The stomatopodbody plan is highly specializedfor predation,yet the SuperorderHoplocarida originatedfrom something other than the "lean,mean, killing machine" seen today.The fossil record of the groupindicates that it originatedearly on froma non-raptorialancestor, with the specialized predatorymorphology developing much later. The RecentHoplocarida have been variouslyposi- tionedwithin the Malacostraca,from a Subclassequal in rankto the Eumalacostraca(= Caridoida) to being placedas a Superorderwithin the Eumalacostraca.Consideration of the early fossil mor- phology,especially of the form of the carapace,of the positionand functioningof the articlesin the last threepairs of thoracopods,and of otherfeatures, suggests that hoplocarids are earlyderiv- ativesof a basaleumalacostracan stock that was "shrimp-like"in form.The enhancementof an ab- dominalrespiratory system most likely allowed the developmentof the anteriorthorax into the specializedraptorial system present today. Wewant to build a phylogenetictree thatpresents the actual evolutionaryhis- tory of the organisms in it. For phylogeny to be correctly inferredfrom the wealthof data available,it is necessaryto identifyinformative homologous fea- tures that allow us to unite organisms in the tree. Sorting out ho- mology from homoplasy is one of the chief pastimes of phylogeneticists. -Raff (1996) The Hoplocaridaare best known today as Ruppertand Barnes (1994) rank the Hoplo- the Order Stomatopoda, the "lean, mean, carida as a Subclass of the Class Malacos- killing machines" of the shallow marine traca,equivalent in rankto the Phyllocarida world. Yet, while it is obvious that the mor- and Eumalacostraca;Meglitsch and Schram phology embodied in the modem stomato- (1991) move the Phyllocaridato a new Class pods is highly specialized, the origins and Phyllopodaand rank the Hoplocaridaand Eu- affinitiesof that morphologyare not quite as malacostracaas subclasses of the Malacos- clear (e.g., Schram, 1969, 1974, 1986; traca;and Brusca and Brusca (1990) place the Hessler, 1982; Dahl, 1983a; Wheeler, 1998; Hoplocaridaas a Superorderwithin the Eu- Wills, 1998). In this paper, the base of the malacostraca,leaving Phyllocaridaas a sub- hoplocaridanclade will be examinedwith a class of the Malacostraca,essentially as Cal- view to establishing its affinities and taxo- man had done. Among treatmentsdealing nomic relationshipswith other malacostra- strictlywith crustaceans,Bowman and Abele cans. (1982), Schram (1986), and Forest (1994) Hoplocaridahave historicallybeen difficult move the Hoplocaridaout of the Eumalacos- to place. Calman(1909) arrangedthe hoplo- traca, whereas Kaestner(1970) divides the caridansalong with other groups within the Malacostracainto six superorders,one of Series Eumalacostracaalongside the Series which is the Hoplocarida.In the presentpa- Phyllocarida.There seems to be no univer- per, we treat the hoplocarids as the sister sally accepted position for the group today, taxon of the syncarid/eucaridline (Table 1). however. Modem invertebratezoology text- From a paleontologicalas well as neonto- books have taken a variety of approaches: logical perspective, the Hoplocaridais rep- 1 2 JOURNALOF CRUSTACEANBIOLOGY, VOL. 20, SPECIALNO. 2, 20u0 Table 1. Conceptual arrangement of the malacostracan orders with stenopodous thoracic limbs (= Eumalacostraca, sensu lato), after Watling (1983, 1999) and Schram (1986), with modifications according to the suggestions in this paper. Known geological ranges are given. Taxa marked with a '?' are of uncertain rank. This schema is not to be seen so much as a functional taxonomy but as a heuristic device to focus discussions and stimulate more detailed and comprehensive cladistic analyses in the future. There is much to be gained by setting aside facies concepts and focusing on identifying and rigorously defining monophyletic groups. Hoplocarida Palaeostomatopodat (L. Carboniferous-U. Carboniferous) Stomatopoda Archaeostomatopodeat (M. Mississippian-U. Pennsylvanian) Unipeltata (L. Jurassic-Recent) ?Syncarida Palaeocaridaceat (L. Carboniferous-L. Permian) Anaspidacea (Triassic-Recent) Bathynellacea (Recent) "Carida" Decapoda (L. Devonian-Recent) Aeschronectidat (M. Pennsylvanian) Belotelsonideat (Carboniferous) Waterstonellideat (Carboniferous) Euphausiacea (Recent) Pygocephalomorphat (Carboniferous-Permian) Lophogastrida (Pennsylvanian-Recent) Mysida (?Jurassic-Recent) Peracarida Mictacea (Recent) Spaleaogriphacea (Mississippian-Recent) Thermosbaenacea (Recent) Tanaidacea (L. Carboniferous-Recent) Cumacea (?Pennsylvanian-Recent) ?Amphipoda (L. Eocene-Recent) ?Isopoda (M. Pennsylvanian-Recent) resentedby one modem order,the Stomato- Calman(1909) gave a brief history of the poda and the extinct Orders Palaeosto- Malacostracaand then provided definitions of matopoda(Late Devonianthrough Late Mis- the groupshe had proposedfive years earlier sissippian)and Aeschronectida(see Schram, (Calman, 1904). These include the Series 1986). The OrderStomatopoda is subdivided Leptostracaand Eumalacostraca,the latter into two Suborders,the Unipeltata (Upper containing the Divisions Syncarida, Per- Jurassicto Recent) containingfossil taxa as acarida,Eucarida, and Hoplocarida. Calman's well as the modem stomatopods,and the Ar- definitionof the Eumalacostracais as follows: chaeostomatopodea(Middle Pennsylvanian to "Abdomenof six somites (the numbermay UpperPennsylvanian) containing only a small be reducedby coalescence),the last of which groupof extinctforms. Recently, Jenner et al. typically bears a pair of appendages,and a (1998) uncovered the possibility that the telson which never bears moveable furcal Palaeostomatopodamight be paraphyleticrel- rami; no adductormuscle of the carapace; ative to the monophyleticStomatopoda. thoracic limbs rarely all similar (Euphausi- acea), typicallypediform, protopodite of two ARE HOPLOCARIDSEUMALACOSTRACANS? segments except in Stomatopoda"(Calman, As a startingpoint, the early definitionsof 1909: 148). Fromthe beginning,then, the def- the Eumalacostracaand the Hoplocaridaneed initionof the Eumalacostracahas exceptions, to be examined.Schram (1969) noted, after butseems to be centeredaround Calman's con- a review of the variouslysuggested phyloge- cept of a "caridoid"facies (Hessler,1982a). netic positions, that the "definitionof a hop- Phyllocarids differ from the other mala- locarid varied from author to author, de- costracans in having polyramous phyl- pendingon the phylogeneticinterpretation he lopodouslimbs andseven abdominalsomites, adopted"(p. 277). one of which is without appendages.Exact WATLINGET AL.: PHYLOGENETICPOSITION OF THE HOPLOCARIDA 3 definitions for the non-phyllocarid malacos- If we focus on hoplocarids and eumala- tracans have always been troublesome be- costracans, Malacostraca sensu stricto are cause of the great diversity of body forms en- united by the following features: "naupliar compassed by all the orders, both living and eye of three cups each with three everse sen- fossil. One solution, derived from the cladis- sory cells, polyramous and stenopodous tho- tic analysis of Schram (1986), was to move racopods, uropods, and a postcephalic cara- the phyllocarids out of the Malacostraca and pace structure that does not envelop the ab- unite them with other phyllopodous limb- domen or thoracic limbs" (Schram, 1986: bearing groups such as the cephalocarids and 528). From there Schram noted that eumala- branchiopodans. This plan generated another costracans have a uniarticulate antennal scale suite of criticisms, but it had the advantage of and strongly elaborated abdominal muscula- making the Malacostraca more homogeneous. ture to facilitate the caridoid escape reaction, By 1969, the effective definition of Eu- while hoplocarids possess triramous anten- malacostraca had become generalized to in- nules, three-articulate thoracopod protopods, clude all malacostracans except phyllocarids: four-articulate thoracopod outer branch, at "Malacostraca generally of shrimp-like form least in the fossil forms, (if one accepts the distinguished from the Phyllocarida
Recommended publications
  • Learning in Stomatopod Crustaceans

    Learning in Stomatopod Crustaceans

    International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 2006, 19 , 297-317. Copyright 2006 by the International Society for Comparative Psychology Learning in Stomatopod Crustaceans Thomas W. Cronin University of Maryland Baltimore County, U.S.A. Roy L. Caldwell University of California, Berkeley, U.S.A. Justin Marshall University of Queensland, Australia The stomatopod crustaceans, or mantis shrimps, are marine predators that stalk or ambush prey and that have complex intraspecific communication behavior. Their active lifestyles, means of predation, and intricate displays all require unusual flexibility in interacting with the world around them, imply- ing a well-developed ability to learn. Stomatopods have highly evolved sensory systems, including some of the most specialized visual systems known for any animal group. Some species have been demonstrated to learn how to recognize and use novel, artificial burrows, while others are known to learn how to identify novel prey species and handle them for effective predation. Stomatopods learn the identities of individual competitors and mates, using both chemical and visual cues. Furthermore, stomatopods can be trained for psychophysical examination of their sensory abilities, including dem- onstration of color and polarization vision. These flexible and intelligent invertebrates continue to be attractive subjects for basic research on learning in animals with relatively simple nervous systems. Among the most captivating of all arthropods are the stomatopod crusta- ceans, or mantis shrimps. These marine creatures, unfamiliar to most biologists, are abundant members of shallow marine ecosystems, where they are often the dominant invertebrate predators. Their common name refers to their method of capturing prey using a folded, anterior raptorial appendage that looks superficially like the foreleg of a praying mantis.
  • Anchialine Cave Biology in the Era of Speleogenomics Jorge L

    Anchialine Cave Biology in the Era of Speleogenomics Jorge L

    International Journal of Speleology 45 (2) 149-170 Tampa, FL (USA) May 2016 Available online at scholarcommons.usf.edu/ijs International Journal of Speleology Off icial Journal of Union Internationale de Spéléologie Life in the Underworld: Anchialine cave biology in the era of speleogenomics Jorge L. Pérez-Moreno1*, Thomas M. Iliffe2, and Heather D. Bracken-Grissom1 1Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Biscayne Bay Campus, North Miami FL 33181, USA 2Department of Marine Biology, Texas A&M University at Galveston, Galveston, TX 77553, USA Abstract: Anchialine caves contain haline bodies of water with underground connections to the ocean and limited exposure to open air. Despite being found on islands and peninsular coastlines around the world, the isolation of anchialine systems has facilitated the evolution of high levels of endemism among their inhabitants. The unique characteristics of anchialine caves and of their predominantly crustacean biodiversity nominate them as particularly interesting study subjects for evolutionary biology. However, there is presently a distinct scarcity of modern molecular methods being employed in the study of anchialine cave ecosystems. The use of current and emerging molecular techniques, e.g., next-generation sequencing (NGS), bestows an exceptional opportunity to answer a variety of long-standing questions pertaining to the realms of speciation, biogeography, population genetics, and evolution, as well as the emergence of extraordinary morphological and physiological adaptations to these unique environments. The integration of NGS methodologies with traditional taxonomic and ecological methods will help elucidate the unique characteristics and evolutionary history of anchialine cave fauna, and thus the significance of their conservation in face of current and future anthropogenic threats.
  • Phylogenetic Evidence That Both Ancient Vicariance and Dispersal Have Contributed to the Biogeographic Patterns of Anchialine Ca

    Phylogenetic Evidence That Both Ancient Vicariance and Dispersal Have Contributed to the Biogeographic Patterns of Anchialine Ca

    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Phylogenetic evidence that both ancient vicariance and dispersal have contributed to Received: 6 December 2016 Accepted: 25 April 2017 the biogeographic patterns of Published: xx xx xxxx anchialine cave shrimps José A. Jurado-Rivera1, Joan Pons2, Fernando Alvarez3, Alejandro Botello4, William F. Humphreys5,6, Timothy J. Page 7,8, Thomas M. Iliffe9, Endre Willassen10, Kenneth Meland11, Carlos Juan1,2 & Damià Jaume2 Cave shrimps from the genera Typhlatya, Stygiocaris and Typhlopatsa (Atyidae) are restricted to specialised coastal subterranean habitats or nearby freshwaters and have a highly disconnected distribution (Eastern Pacific, Caribbean, Atlantic, Mediterranean, Madagascar, Australia). The combination of a wide distribution and a limited dispersal potential suggests a large-scale process has generated this geographic pattern. Tectonic plates that fragment ancestral ranges (vicariance) has often been assumed to cause this process, with the biota as passive passengers on continental blocks. The ancestors of these cave shrimps are believed to have inhabited the ancient Tethys Sea, with three particular geological events hypothesised to have led to their isolation and divergence; (1) the opening of the Atlantic Ocean, (2) the breakup of Gondwana, and (3) the closure of the Tethys Seaway. We test the relative contribution of vicariance and dispersal in the evolutionary history of this group using mitochondrial genomes to reconstruct phylogenetic and biogeographic scenarios with fossil- based calibrations. Given that the Australia/Madagascar shrimp divergence postdates the Gondwanan breakup, our results suggest both vicariance (the Atlantic opening) and dispersal. The Tethys closure appears not to have been influential, however we hypothesise that changing marine currents had an important early influence on their biogeography.
  • Decapod Crustacean Grooming: Functional Morphology, Adaptive Value, and Phylogenetic Significance

    Decapod Crustacean Grooming: Functional Morphology, Adaptive Value, and Phylogenetic Significance

    Decapod crustacean grooming: Functional morphology, adaptive value, and phylogenetic significance N RAYMOND T.BAUER Center for Crustacean Research, University of Southwestern Louisiana, USA ABSTRACT Grooming behavior is well developed in many decapod crustaceans. Antennular grooming by the third maxillipedes is found throughout the Decapoda. Gill cleaning mechanisms are qaite variable: chelipede brushes, setiferous epipods, epipod-setobranch systems. However, microstructure of gill cleaning setae, which are equipped with digitate scale setules, is quite conservative. General body grooming, performed by serrate setal brushes on chelipedes and/or posterior pereiopods, is best developed in decapods at a natant grade of body morphology. Brachyuran crabs exhibit less body grooming and virtually no specialized body grooming structures. It is hypothesized that the fouling pressures for body grooming are more severe in natant than in replant decapods. Epizoic fouling, particularly microbial fouling, and sediment fouling have been shown r I m ans of amputation experiments to produce severe effects on olfactory hairs, gills, and i.icubated embryos within short lime periods. Grooming has been strongly suggested as an important factor in the coevolution of a rhizocephalan parasite and its anomuran host. The behavioral organization of grooming is poorly studied; the nature of stimuli promoting grooming is not understood. Grooming characters may contribute to an understanding of certain aspects of decapod phylogeny. The occurrence of specialized antennal grooming brushes in the Stenopodidea, Caridea, and Dendrobranchiata is probably not due to convergence; alternative hypotheses are proposed to explain the distribution of this grooming character. Gill cleaning and general body grooming characters support a thalassinidean origin of the Anomura; the hypothesis of brachyuran monophyly is supported by the conservative and unique gill-cleaning method of the group.
  • Zootaxa,Crustacean Classification

    Zootaxa,Crustacean Classification

    Zootaxa 1668: 313–325 (2007) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2007 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Crustacean classification: on-going controversies and unresolved problems* GEOFF A. BOXSHALL Department of Zoology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom E-mail: [email protected] *In: Zhang, Z.-Q. & Shear, W.A. (Eds) (2007) Linnaeus Tercentenary: Progress in Invertebrate Taxonomy. Zootaxa, 1668, 1–766. Table of contents Abstract . 313 Introduction . 313 Treatment of parasitic Crustacea . 315 Affinities of the Remipedia . 316 Validity of the Entomostraca . 318 Exopodites and epipodites . 319 Using of larval characters in estimating phylogenetic relationships . 320 Fossils and the crustacean stem lineage . 321 Acknowledgements . 322 References . 322 Abstract The journey from Linnaeus’s original treatment to modern crustacean systematics is briefly characterised. Progress in our understanding of phylogenetic relationships within the Crustacea is linked to continuing discoveries of new taxa, to advances in theory and to improvements in methodology. Six themes are discussed that serve to illustrate some of the major on-going controversies and unresolved problems in the field as well as to illustrate changes that have taken place since the time of Linnaeus. These themes are: 1. the treatment of parasitic Crustacea, 2. the affinities of the Remipedia, 3. the validity of the Entomostraca, 4. exopodites and epipodites, 5. using larval characters in estimating phylogenetic rela- tionships, and 6. fossils and the crustacean stem-lineage. It is concluded that the development of the stem lineage concept for the Crustacea has been dominated by consideration of taxa known only from larval or immature stages.
  • Guide to Crustacea

    Guide to Crustacea

    38 Guide to Crustacea. This is a very large and varied group, comprising numerous families which are grouped under six Sub-orders. In the Sub-order ASELLOTA the uropods are slender ; the basal segments of the legs are not coalesced with the body as in most other Isopoda ; the first pair of abdominal limbs are generally fused, in the female, to form an operculum, or cover for the remaining pairs. This group includes Asellus aquaticus, which is FIG. 23. Bathynomus giganteus, about one-half natural size. (From Lankester's "Treatise on Zoology," after Milne-Edwards and Bouvier.) [Table-case No. 6.] common everywhere in ponds and ditches in this country, and a very large number of marine species, mostly of small size. The Sub-order PHKEATOICIDEA includes a small number of very peculiar species found in fresh water in Australia and New Zealand. In these the body is flattened from side to side, and Peraca rida—Isopoda. 39 the animals in other respects have a superficial resemblance to Amphipoda. In the Sub-order FLABELLIFERA the terminal limbs of the abdomen (uropods) are spread out in a fan-like manner on each side of the telson. Many species of this group, belonging to the family Cymothoidae, are blood-sucking parasites of fish, and some of them are remarkable for being hermaphrodite (like the Cirri- pedia), each animal being at first a male and afterwards a female. Mo' of these parasites are found adhering to the surface of the body, behind the fins or under the gill-covers of the fish. A few, however, become internal parasites like the Artystone trysibia exhibited in this case, which has burrowed into the body of a Brazilian freshwater fish.
  • Horseshoe Crab Limulus Polyphemus

    Horseshoe Crab Limulus Polyphemus

    Supplemental Volume: Species of Conservation Concern SC SWAP 2015 Atlantic Horseshoe Crab Limulus polyphemus Contributor (2005): Elizabeth Wenner (SCDNR) Reviewed and Edited (2013): Larry Delancey and Peter Kingsley-Smith [SCDNR] DESCRITPION Taxonomy and Basic Description Despite their name, horseshoe crabs are not true crabs. The Atlantic horseshoe crab, Limulus polyphemus, is the only member of the Arthropoda subclass Xiphosura found in the Atlantic. Unlike true crabs, which have 2 pairs of antennae, a pair of jaws and 5pairs of legs, horseshoe crabs lack antennae and jaws and have 7 pairs of legs, including a pair of chelicerae. Chelicerae are appendages similar to those used by spiders and scorpions for grasping and crushing. In addition, horseshoe crabs have book lungs, similar to spiders and different from crabs, which have gills. Thus, horseshoe crabs are more closely related to spiders and scorpions than they are to other crabs. Their carapace is divided into three sections: the anterior portion is the prosoma; the middle section is the opithosoma; and the “tail” is called the telson. Horseshoe crabs have two pairs of eyes located on the prosoma, one anterior set of simple eyes, and one set of lateral compound eyes similar to those of insects. In addition, they possess a series of photoreceptors on the opithosoma and telson (Shuster 1982). Horseshoe crabs are long-lived animals. After attaining sexual maturity at 9 to 12 years of age, they may live for another 10 years or more. Like other arthropods, horseshoe crabs must molt in order to grow. As the horseshoe crab ages, more and more time passes between molts, with 16 to 19 molts occurring before a crab becomes mature, stops growing, and switches energy expenditure to reproduction.
  • From Ghost and Mud Shrimp

    From Ghost and Mud Shrimp

    Zootaxa 4365 (3): 251–301 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) http://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2017 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4365.3.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C5AC71E8-2F60-448E-B50D-22B61AC11E6A Parasites (Isopoda: Epicaridea and Nematoda) from ghost and mud shrimp (Decapoda: Axiidea and Gebiidea) with descriptions of a new genus and a new species of bopyrid isopod and clarification of Pseudione Kossmann, 1881 CHRISTOPHER B. BOYKO1,4, JASON D. WILLIAMS2 & JEFFREY D. SHIELDS3 1Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West @ 79th St., New York, New York 10024, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected] 2Department of Biology, Hofstra University, Hempstead, New York 11549, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected] 3Department of Aquatic Health Sciences, Virginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William & Mary, P.O. Box 1346, Gloucester Point, Virginia 23062, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected] 4Corresponding author Table of contents Abstract . 252 Introduction . 252 Methods and materials . 253 Taxonomy . 253 Isopoda Latreille, 1817 . 253 Bopyroidea Rafinesque, 1815 . 253 Ionidae H. Milne Edwards, 1840. 253 Ione Latreille, 1818 . 253 Ione cornuta Bate, 1864 . 254 Ione thompsoni Richardson, 1904. 255 Ione thoracica (Montagu, 1808) . 256 Bopyridae Rafinesque, 1815 . 260 Pseudioninae Codreanu, 1967 . 260 Acrobelione Bourdon, 1981. 260 Acrobelione halimedae n. sp. 260 Key to females of species of Acrobelione Bourdon, 1981 . 262 Gyge Cornalia & Panceri, 1861. 262 Gyge branchialis Cornalia & Panceri, 1861 . 262 Gyge ovalis (Shiino, 1939) . 264 Ionella Bonnier, 1900 .
  • Relationships Within Eumalacostracan Crustacea Frederick R

    Relationships Within Eumalacostracan Crustacea Frederick R

    •J'' • TRANSACTIONS OF THE SAN DIEGO SOCIETY OF NATURAL HISTORY CRUSTACEA LIBRARY SMITHSONIAN INST« RETURN TO VT-119 Volume 20 Number 16 pp. 301-312 20 November 1984 Relationships within Eumalacostracan Crustacea Frederick R. Schram San Diego Natural History Museum, P.O. Box 1390, San Diego, CA 92112 USA Abstract. A cladistic analysis was performed on 20 constituent higher taxa within the Eumala- costraca based on 31 characters of external anatomy. Variants of the most parsimonious scheme are presented, and the effects of tolerating different levels of uncertainty are evaluated. It is concluded that: 1) while the basic outline of Caiman's (1904) taxonomy of Eumalacostraca might be utilized, the arrangement within peracarids postulated by Siewing (1956) cannot be maintained; 2) the Bauplane approach of Schram (1981) has some merit and some of the controversial higher taxonomic groupings of eumalacostracan "orders" originally indicated by that method are vindicated; 3) the idea that the carapace is a derived feature within eumalacostracans, advanced by Dahl (1983), can be maintained only if a high level of homoplasy is tolerated; 4) the concept of a taxon Mysidacea seems best abandoned. INTRODUCTION The basic modern classification of eumalacostracan crustaceans was outlined by Caiman (1904, 1909) with little reference at that time to what the details of phyletic relationships between and within groups might have been. However, it was Siewing (1951, 1956) who presented a phylogenetic tree for eumalacostracans widely subscribed to by subsequent authorities (e.g., Fryer 1964, Hessler 1969). Recently, however, the Calman/Siewing scheme for Eumalacostraca sensu stricto has been questioned. Schram (1981) recognized basic structural plans within the Eu- malacostraca, but the methodology he employed was limited by the number of char- acters that could be handled essentially by pencil and paper.
  • (Crustacea: Phyllocarida) from the Ría De Ferrol (Galicia, NW Iberian Peninsula), with Description of a New Species of Nebalia Leach, 1814

    (Crustacea: Phyllocarida) from the Ría De Ferrol (Galicia, NW Iberian Peninsula), with Description of a New Species of Nebalia Leach, 1814

    SCIENTIA MARINA 73(2) June 2009, 269-285, Barcelona (Spain) ISSN: 0214-8358 doi: 10.3989/scimar.2009.73n2269 Leptostracans (Crustacea: Phyllocarida) from the Ría de Ferrol (Galicia, NW Iberian Peninsula), with description of a new species of Nebalia Leach, 1814 JUAN MOREIRA 1, GUILLERMO DÍAZ-AGRAS 1, MARÍA CANDÁS 1, MARCOS P. SEÑARÍS 1 and VICTORIANO URGORRI 1,2,3 1 Estación de Bioloxía Mariña da Graña, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Casa do Hórreo, Rúa da Ribeira 1, E-15590, A Graña, Ferrol, Spain. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Departamento de Zooloxía e Antropoloxía Física, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Campus Sur, E-15782, Santiago de Compostela, Spain. 3 Instituto de Acuicultura, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Campus Sur, E-15782, Santiago de Compostela, Spain. SUMMARY: Knowledge on taxonomy and ecology of leptostracan crustaceans is still scarce in many parts of the world. Sampling in subtidal sediments in the Ria of Ferrol (NW Spain) between 2006 and 2007 yielded several leptostracan speci- mens belonging to six species. This is, so far, the largest number of leptostracan species reported from a single area. Some specimens belong to an undescribed species of Nebalia Leach, 1814, which is described herein as N. reboredae n. sp. The new species has a rostrum about 2.2 times as long as wide, the antennular scale is slightly more than twice as long as wide, the fourth article of the antennule has one short thick distal spine, the first article of the endopod of the second maxilla is 1.3 times as long as the second one, the exopod of the second maxilla is longer than the first article of the endopod, the posterior dorsal borders of pleonites 5-7 are provided with distally rounded to truncated denticles, and the uropods are as long as pleonite 7 and the anal somite combined.
  • First Report of a Deep Sea Spider Crab, Encephaloides Armstrongi Wood- Mason and Alcock, 1891 from Gujarat Waters of India

    First Report of a Deep Sea Spider Crab, Encephaloides Armstrongi Wood- Mason and Alcock, 1891 from Gujarat Waters of India

    Indian Journal of Geo Marine Sciences Vol. 46 (05), May 2017, pp. 982-985 First report of a deep sea spider crab, Encephaloides armstrongi Wood- Mason and Alcock, 1891 from Gujarat waters of India Gyanaranjan Dash*, Mohammed Koya K. & Nayan P. Makwana Veraval Regional Centre of CMFRI, Matsya Bhavan, Bhidia, Veraval: 362 269, Gujarat, India *[E-mail: [email protected]/[email protected]] Received 17 September 2014 ; revised 14 January 2015 A single specimen of the male crab (3.0 cm carapace length and 3.8 g body weight) was collected from the incidental catch sample of a multiday trawler operating at a depth range of 107-132 m off Gujarat coast of India. The detailed morphometric measurements and diagnostic features with updated systematics have been presented in this paper. The crab has well devolved branchial region and thrive in the oxygen minimum zone of the sea. [Keywords: Deep sea spider crab, Encephaloides armstrongi, Veraval, Gujarat] Introduction Materials and Methods Crabs are one of the benthic crustacean faunas The present crab specimen was collected from and are exploited by fishing vessels mostly as a multiday trawler operating in a depth range of incidental catch targeting valuable shrimp stocks 30-135 m off Veraval coast of Gujarat, India. The of the coast. The species described here is Veraval Regional Centre of Central Marine identified as Encephaloides armstrongi and Fisheries Research Institute (CMFRI) is belongs to the family ‘Inachidae’. Earlier known continuously collecting information about the distribution of the crab is shown in Figure 1. The spatial and temporal distribution of fishery crab was reported for the first time from Bay of resources with the help of commercial fishing Bengal in the north-east Indian Ocean1.
  • Mysida and Lophogastrida of Greece: a Preliminary Checklist

    Mysida and Lophogastrida of Greece: a Preliminary Checklist

    Biodiversity Data Journal 4: e9288 doi: 10.3897/BDJ.4.e9288 Taxonomic Paper Mysida and Lophogastrida of Greece: a preliminary checklist Panayota Koulouri‡, Vasilis Gerovasileiou‡‡, Nicolas Bailly ‡ Institute of Marine Biology, Biotechnology and Aquaculture, Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, Heraklion, Greece Corresponding author: Panayota Koulouri ([email protected]) Academic editor: Christos Arvanitidis Received: 20 May 2016 | Accepted: 17 Jul 2016 | Published: 01 Nov 2016 Citation: Koulouri P, Gerovasileiou V, Bailly N (2016) Mysida and Lophogastrida of Greece: a preliminary checklist. Biodiversity Data Journal 4: e9288. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e9288 Abstract Background The checklist of Mysida and Lophogastrida of Greece was created within the framework of the Greek Taxon Information System (GTIS), which is one of the applications of the LifeWatchGreece Research Infrastructure (ESFRI) resuming efforts to develop a complete checklist of species recorded and reported from Greek waters. The objectives of the present study were to update and cross-check taxonomically all records of Mysida and Lophogastrida species known to occur in Greek waters in order to search for inaccuracies and omissions. New information The up-to-date checklist of Mysida and Lophogastrida of Greece comprises 49 species, classified to 25 genera. © Koulouri P et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. 2 Koulouri P et al. Keywords Mysida, Lophogastrida, Greece, Aegean Sea, Sea of Crete, Ionian Sea, Eastern Mediterranean, checklist Introduction The peracarid crustaceans Lophogastrida, Stygiomysida and Mysida were formerly grouped under the order "Mysidacea".