Transport Assessment

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Transport Assessment TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT LONDON BRIDGE STATION CONTENTS Page 1 Introduction & Background 3 1.1 Overview 3 1.2 Scoping Process 3 1.3 Site Location 3 1.4 Description of the Project 4 1.5 Project Objectives 4 1.6 Previous Applications 5 1.7 Relationship with Transport & Works Act Order 5 2 Policy Background 6 2.1 Introduction 6 2.2 National Policy 6 2.3 Regional Policy 7 2.4 Local Policies 8 3 Study Area 10 4 Cumulative Impacts 12 5 Baseline conditions 13 5.1 Land uses 13 5.2 Road network 15 5.3 Existing station 17 5.4 Passenger flows in/to/from the station complex 19 5.5 Other public transport, walking and cycling 20 6 Trip Generation 26 6.1 Passenger flows in/to/from the station complex 26 6.2 Car parking 27 6.3 Vehicle trips 28 7 Construction Period Impacts 30 7.1 Construction period and worksites 30 7.2 Stainer Street and Weston Street closures 30 7.3 St Thomas Street closure 30 7.4 Construction trips generated and routes 31 7.5 Road network impacts – during construction 32 7.6 Traffic management during construction 40 7.7 Impacts on buses during construction 40 7.8 Impacts on pedestrian and cycle routes during construction 41 7.9 Impacts on train services and passengers during construction 41 8 Permanent Impacts 43 8.1 Overview 43 8.2 Diverted trips 43 8.3 Potential wider highway network changes 46 8.4 Operational impacts 48 8.5 Parking 51 8.6 Public transport impacts – overview 51 8.7 Impact on rail passengers – across the rail network 51 8.8 Impact on rail passengers at London Bridge 54 8.9 Pedestrian flows in the station complex 54 8.10 Bus network 54 8.11 Walking 56 8.12 Cycling 57 8.13 Taxis 59 9 Mitigation 61 9.1 Road network 61 9.2 Public transport 61 9.3 Travel Plan 61 9.4 Delivery and Servicing Plan 61 9.5 Construction Logistics Plan 61 9.6 Planning obligations / Section 278 discussions 62 10 Summary and Conclusions 63 10.2 Public transport 63 10.3 Trip generation, parking, deliveries and servicing 63 10.4 Road network 63 10.5 Walking 64 10.6 Cycling 65 10.7 Taxis 65 Appendix 1 - Scoping Report Appendix 2 - Comments On Scoping Report Appendix 3 – Minutes of Scoping Meetings on 6 December 2010 and 28 February 2011 Appendix 4 – Summary of PERS / CSA Audit Results Appendix 5 – Accident data analysis Appendix 6 – Cycling Assessment Appendix 7 – Train Operations During Construction Appendix 8 – Pedestrian modelling of existing station Appendix 9 – Pedestrian modelling of proposed station Appendix 10 – Pedestrian Modelling of Local Streetscape and Crossings Appendix 11 – Base Year Traffic Modelling report Appendix 12 – Future Year Traffic Modelling report Appendix 13 – Highways Optioneering Modelling report Appendix 14 – Strategic Traffic Modelling report Appendix 15 – Travel Plan TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT LONDON BRIDGE STATION REDEVELOPMENT 1 INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND 1.1 Overview 1.1.1 This Transport Assessment (TA) has been prepared as part of the planning application for redevelopment of London Bridge Station. 1.1.2 It has been prepared in line with the Department for Transport’s Guidance on Transport Assessment, Transport for London’s (TfL’s) Transport Assessment Best Practice Guidance Document, and the London Borough of Southwark’s Sustainable Transport Supplementary Planning Document. 1.1.3 This TA also acts as a supporting report for the traffic and transport chapter of an Environmental Statement (ES) which is being submitted with the planning application. 1.2 Scoping Process 1.2.1 A Scoping Report was issued in November 2010. Comments on the Scoping Report were received from TfL and Southwark. Further discussions were held between Network Rail, TfL and Southwark to agree the final scope of the TA. A pre-application meeting was held on 6 June 2011. 1.2.2 Appendix 1 reproduces the Scoping Report. Appendix 2 reproduces the comments received on the scoping report, and shows how they have been addressed in this TA. Appendix 3 reproduces the notes of further technical meetings held on 6 December 2010 and 28 February 2011 to agree traffic proposals and modelling requirements. 1.3 Site Location 1.3.1 The Project site is located in the London Borough of Southwark (LBS) on the south bank of the River Thames and is located at the southern end of London Bridge, one of the key crossings of the river and which provides an important route into the City of London. For the purpose of the planning application, the site is bounded by the red line as shown in Figure 1.1, and is about 6.2ha in area. Figure 1.1: Site Location Plan This map is reproduced from Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office. © Crown copyright Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. 0100040692 2010 London Bridge Station Redevelopment TA Prepared by Parsons Brinckerhoff Ltd June 2011 Page 3 for Network Rail TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT LONDON BRIDGE STATION REDEVELOPMENT 1.4 Description of the Project 1.4.1 The Project is proposed by Network Rail and forms part of the Thameslink Programme (TLP). The TLP is a wider scheme that will introduce new and improved stations, new track, new cross-London routes and new longer and more frequent trains in order to reduce overcrowding. Up to 18 train paths per hour are proposed through the redeveloped station. 1.4.2 The Project proposes a new station concourse without which the Thameslink programme cannot be delivered. It is relevant to note that the track works themselves already have the benefit of consent under the Transport and Works Act Order granted for the Thameslink scheme. 1.4.3 The proposal is for: Provision of a new Station layout at London Bridge, including construction of new Station Concourse, together with the demolition of existing arches; the demolition of Listed train shed and part of the wall on St Thomas Street; and the demolition of 84 Tooley Street and the construction of new replacement facades on Tooley Street and St Thomas Street; landscaping and other works associated with the station. 1.4.4 The planning application and ES will relate to the station building redevelopment and the works required for that. They will not examine in-principle issues relating to the rail works themselves as these already have the benefit of permission granted through the Transport and Works Act Order confirmed in 2006. 1.4.5 Main construction is due to begin in 2012, after the Olympic and Paralympic Games period, and is due to finish in 2018. 1.5 Project Objectives 1.5.1 Operational Objectives x The main objective of the proposal is to enable the Thameslink Programme to be delivered. x The Thameslink Programme requires change in platform configuration at London Bridge, increasing the number of through platforms and reducing the number of terminating platforms. Without these operational changes 80% of the benefits of the Thameslink Programme cannot be delivered. x This operational work is one of the last parts of the Thameslink Programme work to be completed. x The operational work at London Bridge requires a new station; the existing station will not physically be able to operate after the platform and track alterations have been implemented. x The Thameslink Programme will dramatically increase the number of people who can use the railway, providing major benefits: o increasing trains through central London by up to 300%, with up to 24 train paths per hour at peak times o increasing capacity with longer, 12-car, trains o removing bottlenecks; the worst are at London Bridge Station London Bridge Station Redevelopment TA Prepared by Parsons Brinckerhoff Ltd June 2011 Page 4 for Network Rail TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT LONDON BRIDGE STATION REDEVELOPMENT o providing direct access to more destinations o reducing crowding on London Underground 1.5.2 Station Objectives x London Bridge Station is at maximum capacity during peak hours and the objective is to provide a better station environment for passengers. x To provide a more coherent station to replace the 'piecemeal' existing station. x To provide a north/south link between Tooley Street & St. Thomas Street by creating a ground level concourse for both train users and the local area, assisting in the regeneration of the area. 1.6 Previous Applications 1.6.1 There is a long planning history at London Bridge Station and this history, through both the Planning Acts and the Transport and Works Act (TWA), establishes a baseline for the current proposal. 1.6.2 In summary:- a) There is an extant planning permission for a new station with an above station office development. This is known as the Masterplan Scheme. This was approved in 2000, and the decision issued in 2003 after completion of a s106 Agreement. It was 'extended' in 2008 and a small element has been implemented. Although extant this Masterplan permission is now to be set to one side and the new proposal is proposed to replace it. It does however set down the principle of a ground level concourse. It also sets down the principle of permanently closing Stainer Street and Weston Street, in connection with the new concourse. b) Listed Building Consent (LBC) for the demolition of the Listed Train Shed was granted alongside the Masterplan permission and this was 'renewed' by virtue of a new LBC application approved in 2008; this will expire in 2011. A new LBC application will be submitted with the new station proposal, however the extant LBC sets down a precedent for the demolition of the Train Shed.
Recommended publications
  • Victorian Heroes: Peabody, Waterlow, and Hartnoll ______
    Victorian Heroes: Peabody, Waterlow, and Hartnoll ____________________________________________________________________________________ Victorian Heroes: Peabody, Waterlow, and Hartnoll The development of housing for the working- classes in Victorian Southwark Part 2: The buildings of Southwark Martin Stilwell © Martin Stilwell 2015 Page 1 of 46 Victorian Heroes: Peabody, Waterlow, and Hartnoll ____________________________________________________________________________________ This paper is Part 2 of a dissertation by the author for a Master of Arts in Local History from Kingston University in 2005. It covers the actual philanthropic housing schemes before WW1. Part 1 covered Southwark, its history and demographics of the time. © Martin Stilwell 2015 Page 2 of 46 Victorian Heroes: Peabody, Waterlow, and Hartnoll ____________________________________________________________________________________ © Martin Stilwell 2015 Page 3 of 46 Victorian Heroes: Peabody, Waterlow, and Hartnoll ____________________________________________________________________________________ Cromwell Buildings, Red Cross Street 1864, Improved Industrial Dwellings Company (IIDC) 18 dwellings, 64 rooms1, 61 actual residents on 1901 census2 At first sight, it is a surprise that this relatively small building has survived in a predominantly commercial area. This survival is mainly due to it being a historically significant building as it is only the second block built by Sydney Waterlow’s IIDC, and the first of a new style developed by Waterlow in conjunction with builder
    [Show full text]
  • 108 Evelina Road, Nunhead, London SE15 3HL Freehold in SE15 for Sale on Behalf of Administrators View More Information
    108 Evelina Road, Nunhead, London SE15 3HL Freehold in SE15 for sale on behalf of administrators View more information... 108 Evelina Road, Nunhead, London SE15 3HL Home Description Location Terms View all of our instructions here... III III • Freehold for sale in sought-after Nunhead, SE15 • Comprises GF commercial unit & first floor flat • ERV - c. £32,000 per annum • Ground floor may have residential conversion potential (stpp) • Sale on behalf of administrators • OIRO - £575,000 F/H DESCRIPTION An opportunity to purchase a mixed-use freehold property in popular Nunhead. The property comprises a ground floor commercial unit which measures c. 534 sqft with small garden and outbuilding and a tidy first floor one bedroom flat which measures c. 466 sqft. The property has an expected rental value of c. £32,000 per annum if let to separate commercial and residential occupiers. The ground floor unit may also have residential conversion potential following on from the precedent of converting ground floor commercial into a residential unit which has been set two doors down at 104 Evelina Road and also 116 Evelina Road. The property is therefore expected to be of interest to both residential developers, owner occupiers and private investors. The property is for sale on behalf of administrators. LOCATION The subject property is situated on Evelina Road (A2214) just off Peckham Rye (A2215) just on the periphery of the popular Nunhead Green Conservation Area. Nunhead Railway Station is approximately 0.3miles away, which provides frequent National Rail services into London Victoria in circa 15 minutes. Evelina Road and Nunhead Lane are home to and number of boutique retail shops, delis, wine bars and restaurants that have established themselves in the area following the increasing popularity of Peckham, Nunhead and the surrounding areas.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 LONG LANE, LONDON, SE1 4PG 2,900 to 21,936 Sq Ft Sq Ft Refurbished "Warehouse" Style Office Space to Let
    1 LONG LANE, LONDON, SE1 4PG 2,900 to 21,936 sq ft sq ft Refurbished "Warehouse" Style Office Space To Let 10 STONEY STREET, LONDON, SE1 0NE | 020 3757 7777 | @UNIONSTPARTNERS UNIONSTREETPARTNERS.CO.UK Subject to Contract. USP for themselves and the vendor of this property give notice that these particulars do not form, or form part of, any offer or contract. They are intended to give fair description of the property and whilst every effort has been made to ensure their accuracy this cannot be guaranteed. Any intending purchaser must therefore satisfy themselves by inspection or otherwise. Neither Farebrother, nor any of its employees, has any authority to make or give any further representations or warranty whatsoever in relation to this property. All prices and rents quoted are net of VAT. 1 LONG LANE, LONDON, SE1 4PG 2,900 to 21,936 sq ft sq ft Refurbished "Warehouse" Style Office Space To Let 1 Long Lane is an attractive former warehouse building that has undergone a comprehensive refurbishment to provide high quality, contemporary office space over lower ground, ground and four upper floors. Location The building is situated at the most western end of Long Lane, immediately adjacent to the junction of Borough High Street and Great Dover Street. Borough Underground Station is a few minutes walk to the south and both London Bridge Station and Borough Market are all within a 10 minute walk to the north. Accommodation 1 Long Lane has been comprehensively refurbished to provide modern, contemporary office accommodation over lower ground to fourth floors.
    [Show full text]
  • Routeing Guide Easements an Easement Which Extends Permission Is a Positive Easement
    Routeing Guide Easements An easement which extends permission is a positive easement. An easement which narrows permission is a negative easement. Map, double-back and fare route easements are always positive. Circuitous route easements are always negative. Other kinds of easements can be positive or negative. A journey which follows a route otherwise permitted by the Routeing Guide may be forbidden by a negative easement. Page F10 of, The National Routeing Guide in detail Positive Easements Easement Category Description Journeys from stations on the the Great Yarmouth-Norwich line via Acle to stations on 000001 Local the Norwich-Lowestoft line may go via Norwich. This easement applies in both directions. Journeys from stations on the Barton-on-Humber line to Habrough and stations west of 000005 Local Habrough may double back between Habrough and Grimsby. This easement applies in both directions. Journeys from Hykeham to and via Newark Northgate or Newark Castle may double 000008 Local back from Lincoln. This easement applies in both directions. Journeys from Surbiton and stations west of Surbiton to Kingston upon Thames and 000012 Doubleback stations north of Kingston Upon Thames, may double back between Wimbledon, Raynes Park and New Malden. This easement applies in both directions. Journeys from Lydney, Chepstow and Caldicot to Swindon, Didcot, Reading and beyond 000013 Routeing Point may go via Newport. This easement applies in both directions. Journeys via or from Frodsham to stations between and including Hooton and 000014 Local Birkenhead Hamilton Square may go via Chester. This easement applies in both directions. Journeys from Caterham, Whyteleafe South and Whyteleafe to South Croydon and beyond may go via Upper Warlingham.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberty of the Mint Conservation Appraisal
    The Liberty of The Mint Conservation Area Appraisal and Management Plan (Adopted Nov 2018) www.southwark.gov.uk 2 Liberty of the Mint Conservation Area Appraisal and Management Plan Section 1: Introduction Location, topography, planning history, further information…………………...………………………………………………………………….5 Liberty of the Mint CA map (figure 1)………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..6 Section 2: History Historic background, Roman, medieval, post medieval, Post medieval to present day……………………………………………………… 7 Section 3: Appraisal and assessment Townscape and character assessment …………………………………………………………………………………………………………….9 Map of feature of special interest (figure 5) ………………………………………………………………………………………………………..11 Character and appearance, special interest and significance……………………………………………………………………………………12 Character areas— .Marshalsea Road, Borough High Street, Sudrey Street and Bittern Street……………………………………………...13 Toulmin Street………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….14 Lant Street/Weller Street/Mint Street ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….16 85-91 Mint Street ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...17 Section 4: Audit Scheduled monuments, Listed Buildings and Key Unlisted Buildings…………………………………………………………………………...18 Section 5: Management and development guidelines Purpose ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...19 Development form and urban morphology, Height and scale, Public realm, Environmental improvements ………………………………..20 Boundaries, Trees and street furniture, Improvements and repairs,
    [Show full text]
  • 74-78 Long Lane, Borough in the London Borough of Southwark Planning Application No
    planning report D&P/4156/01 19 July 2017 74-78 Long Lane, Borough in the London Borough of Southwark planning application no. 17/AP/2122 Strategic planning application stage 1 referral Town & Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended); Greater London Authority Acts 1999 and 2007; Town & Country Planning (Mayor of London) Order 2008. The proposal Demolition of the existing building and the erection of a mixed-use 15 storey building comprising up to 172 co-living units (sui generis) with shared amenity space and ancillary residential facilities, co-working office space (Class B1) with ancillary facilities, together with basement, access, servicing, cycle storage, plant and public realm. The applicant The applicant is Spaces London Bridge, and the architect is MAKE. Strategic issues Principle of development: the proposed mix of uses including modern commercial co-working floorspace and residential accommodation within this part of the CAZ are supported (paragraphs 13 to 17). Housing & affordable housing: the proposed co-living residential product is supported in principle subject to the development demonstrating exemplar residential quality. The lack of affordable housing offer at this stage is wholly unacceptable. The financial viability assessment is currently subject to robust interrogation by GLA officers to ensure that the maximum reasonable contribution towards affordable housing is delivered (paragraphs 18 to 23). Residential quality: the poor standard of residential quality is unacceptable. The applicant must increase the proportion of larger rooms, reduce the number of units sharing the largest floors, and significantly increase the size of communal facilities. (paragraphs 25 to 27). Urban design: the applicant must give further consideration to the lower massing elements to achieve a simpler, slender and elegant overall built form (paragraph 34).
    [Show full text]
  • Long Lane & Tabard St, Southwark
    Housing the Workers Early London County Council Housing 1889-1914 Martin Stilwell August 2015 Part 3 – the schemes in detail 27 – Long Lane & Tabard St, Southwark _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Early LCC Housing – 27: Long Lane & Tabard St Page 1 of 9 © Martin Stilwell 2015 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Early LCC Housing – 27: Long Lane & Tabard St Page 2 of 9 © Martin Stilwell 2015 Long Lane & Tabard Street Scheme, Southwark (1st development) Barnaby Buildings, Long Lane, 1904 Built under Part III of the 1890 Housing of the Working Classes Act This building was the first of a large slum clearance and working class housing scheme for the Long Lane area of Southwark. Long Lane was always a notorious slum area and it is surprising the Council did not try and address the problem earlier. This part of Southwark was an old part of London with many bad slums. Most of the slums to the west of Borough High Street had been cleared by the turn of the century, but Long Lane was next and clearances began in the early 1900s. New buildings were slow to be built and much of the re-development did not take place until the 1920s. The cost of the scheme was probably the reason the re-development took so long. The whole area was riddled with slums and unscrupulous landlords who were keen to extract the most value from their land. The Booth map of the area in Fig. 1 shows the whole Long Lane area, with the bad housing in dark blue or black. Fig. 1: Long Lane re-development area from Booth Poverty Map of 1899 _____________________________________________________________________________________________________ Early LCC Housing – 27: Long Lane & Tabard St Page 3 of 9 © Martin Stilwell 2015 The photo in Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Chairman's Report
    Newsletter No. 83 – May 2015 Free to members Chairman’s Report In this Issue: Bob Flanagan • Laurel Hill In Newsletter 65 (May 2009) I was pleased to report that Conservation Jennie Kovacs and her father Chris Berens had assumed NewsCemetery, Page 3 Philadelphia the burial rights to the mausoleum built by his ancestor • ThePage Page4 4 Otto Berens in 1857. Their perseverance has been re- warded and a restoration has now been accomplished that • TheHenry Berens Page 6 does great credit to them, and to Adam Daybell, English Heritage, Ron Knee, and everyone else who contributed • JohnMausoleum Page 9 1857-2015 to the project (see article, p. 6). We owe all those in- volved a great debt of gratitude. For our part we have • TapPage 6Page 12 committed to not only keeping a watching brief on the • GustavIron Tsar Adolph Page 13 monument, but also to the care of the surrounding area and perhaps in time restoration of the railings that once • TheKaye Page (Koenig- 14 surrounded the plot. sfeld) (1883- • As to the negotia- 1918)Cemetery Page Page 10 tions with Lamb- 14 eth Council over • Reverend John • Forthcoming the funding and More (1840- governance of the Events Page 15 1910) Page 11 cemetery, there is • further progress. • A Bit of Mystery PageRecent 16 FOWNC An internal Coun- Events Page 13 cil committee has approved a 9-year • Forthcoming capital investment Events Page 15 plan for its cemet- eries (i.e. Lamb- • A Bit of Mystery eth and Streatham Page 16 cemeteries as well as Norwood) of up to £15 million.
    [Show full text]
  • Chairman's Report
    Newsletter No. 77 – May 2013 Free to members Chairman’s Report In this Issue: Bob Flanagan Sadly, Sexton Keith Lucas finally left Lambeth employ- • Norwood in the ment at the end of March. Keith retired officially a couple Second World of years ago (see Newsletter 68, May 2010), but his War Page 3 temporary contract has now been terminated. There was no consultation with either FOWNC, or the Scheme of • R.C. Carrington Management Committee (SoMC) over this action. This FRS, Solar seems to me to have been yet another decision that Astronomer Lambeth may have not thought through properly… (1826–1875) Keith has served the Page 4 citizens of Lambeth • The Brockwell and the wider comm- Hall Estate in unity in South Lon- the 19 th don through his work in the cemetery for Century Page 11 29 years, in many • Wanderers vs . cases at a time of Royal Engineers great confusion and distress for individ- 2012 Page 12 uals and for families. He has also played a • Recent FOWNC major part in helping Events Page 14 preserve for future • Forthcoming generations what re- Events Page 14 mains of our historic cemetery. • A Bit of Mystery Keith chose to be Page 16 photographed by his Sexton Keith Lucas and the favourite monument, Grade II* listed tombstone of the tomb of the anti- John Britton (grave 5,235, quarian John Britton square 119 ) (1771–1857). This is a massive ‘henge’ of Millstone Grit designed by the architectural journalist George Godwin (1803–1887), now sadly shorn of its protective railings since the clearance work in this part of the cemetery.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 3, No. 124, January 10, 2008
    An injury to one is an injury to all Volume 3 No. 124 10 January 2008 S& WoORlKiEdRS’a LIBrERiTtY y 30p/80p Since 2005 the Unite union in New Zealand has run a “Super Size My Pay” campaign focussing on fast food and coffee shop workers. Starbucks workers have gone on strike. Unite has won wage increases for young workers. An organiser from Unite will be touring the UK in February to tell us how they did it. More, page 3. How young workers can organise NZ unionist’s tour will tell how it’s done turn to page 3 2 NEWS US: pick-the-millionaire time BY SACHA ISMAIL like the 44 million Americans with no health insurance, let alone tackling the deep and grow- UNDREDS and even thousands of ing inequalities of US society. enthusiastic supporters have turned out In any case, even genuinely left-wing Hat rallies and actions for the various Democrats like Jesse Jackson and, today, candidates in the “primary” elections currently primary candidate Dennis Kucinich, are underway to select the two main parties’ candi- supporters of a bourgeois political party that is dates for the November 2008 US presidential an essential part of the machinery through election. It is a striking contrast with the now which the US ruling class maintains its political almost universal apathy surrounding elections in power. Socialists cannot support any the UK: even if Gordon Brown had allowed a Democratic candidate, because doing so means contest for the Labour leadership, can you imag- giving up on the task of building an independent ine crowds of thousands turning out to support voice for the US working class.
    [Show full text]
  • Langdale House, 11 Marshalsea Road, London Se1 1En
    LANGDALE HOUSE, 11 MARSHALSEA ROAD, LONDON SE1 1EN OFFICE TO RENT | 486 - 2,665 SQ FT | £2,900 - £15,916 PER MONTH INCLUSIVE CONSULTATION AGENCY IN LONDON FLEXIBLE OFFICE SPACE FLEXIBLEOFFICESPACE.CO 27 Bream's Buildings London EC4A 1DZ T (0) 203 929 0929 LANGDALE HOUSE, 11 MARSHALSEA ROAD, LONDON SE1 1EN SERVICED OFFICES IN THE HEART OF BOROUGH 486 - 2,665 SQ FT | £2,900 - £15,916 PER MONTH INCLUSIVE DESCRIPTION AMENITIES Langdale House is a converted Victorian warehouse offering Meeting and Conference Rooms serviced office space in the heart of Borough only a short distance Bureau Services from the famous Borough Market. On-Site Centre Manager Kitchen Facilities Langdale House is located within the Borough of Southwark, on the south side of Marshalsea Road, 100 metres to the west of Borough Break-Out Rooms High Street. 24 Hour Access CClV The property benefits from good transport links being close to both Borough underground station (Northern line) and London Bridge TERMS underground station (Northern & Jubilee lines) and mainline railway, providing excellent access to the West End, City and Canary Wharf. RENT RATES S/C £2,900 - £15,916 Per Inclusive Inclusive AVAILABILITY Month Inclusive FLOOR DESKS MONTHLY COST SIZE (SQ FT) G05 6 £2,900.00 486 102 16 £5,726.00 1,155 103 5 £2,675.00 492 104 7 £4,612.00 532 TOTAL 34 £15,913.00 2,665 GET IN TOUCH ADRIAN GOLDNEY TOM GAYDON Flexible Office Space Flexible Office Space 020 3929 0929 07950 950088 [email protected] [email protected] SUBJECT TO CONTRACT.
    [Show full text]
  • Dear Ms Ashforth
    54 BOROUGH HIGH STREET LONDON BRIDGE LONDON SE1 1XL 020 7234 9639 www.fieldandsons.biz SELF CONTAINED OFFICE FOR SALE (L/H) 24A MARSHALESEA ROAD LONDON SE1 1HF APPROX. 1,814 SQ FT (168.5 SQ M) LOCATION Self-contained office located on Marshalsea Road at the junction with Redcross Way, close to the junction with Southwark Bridge Road and within 200m of Borough Underground (Northern line). London Bridge station is also within a short walk and the property is close to the popular Borough Market, Flat Iron Square and the various attractions of the Bankside locality. The surrounding area is a highly popular residential, business and tourist locality; with extensive recent developments providing a vibrant mix of restaurants, bars, offices and apartments; including 'The Shard' development at London Bridge and the £6.5 billion full redevelopment of London Bridge station itself. DESCRIPTION The available accommodation is arranged over the ground and lower ground floors. Each floor is predominantly open plan office space plus meeting room, kitchen and W.C. facilities. Own entrance direct from street level, with internal stairs to the side, connecting the two floors. 24A MARSHALESEA ROAD, SE1 ACCOMODATION The approximate Net Internal Areas are as follows: Ground Floor = 876 sq ft ( 81.3 sqm) Lower Floor = 938 sq ft ( 87.1 sqm) Total = 1,814 sq ft (168.5 sqm) AMENITIES The premises benefits from the following amenities: • Gas central heating • Cat. II lighting • Security grills • Own kitchen and W.C facilities • Security Alarm TERMS The property is offered for sale with full vacant possession by way of the existing 125 year leasehold from 2001, with a ground rent of £125 per annum.
    [Show full text]