Pecuniary Interests Relating to Any Items of Business to Be Discussed at This Meeting

Members are reminded that they must declare all relevant pecuniary and non- pecuniary interests relating to any items of business to be discussed at this meeting

BIRMINGHAM CITY COUNCIL

LICENSING AND PUBLIC PROTECTION COMMITTEE

WEDNESDAY, 19 OCTOBER 2016 AT 10:00 HOURS IN COMMITTEE ROOMS 3 & 4, COUNCIL HOUSE, VICTORIA SQUARE, BIRMINGHAM, B1 1BB

A G E N D A

1 NOTICE OF RECORDING

The Chairman to advise that this meeting will be webcast for live or subsequent broadcast via the Council's Internet site ( www.birminghamnewsroom.com ) and that members of the press/public may record and take photographs.

The whole of the meeting will be filmed except where there are confidential or exempt items.

2 APOLOGIES

3 MINUTES 5 - 14 To note the public part of the Minutes of the meeting held on 14 September 2016.

4 SPORTS GROUND SECURITY ARRANGEMENTS 15 - 22 Report of the Acting Director of Regulation and Enforcement.

5 STATEMENT OF LICENSI NG POLICY CUMULATIVE IMPACT AREAS 23 - 52 POST CONSULTATION REPORT - JOHN BRIGHT STREET AREA

Report of the Acting Director of Regulation and Enforcement.

6 STATEMENT OF LICENSI NG POLICY CUMULATIVE IMPACT AREAS 53 - 78 POST CONSULTATION REPORT - ERDINGTON AREA

Report of the Acting Director of Regulation and Enforcement.

Page 1 of 152 7 STATEMENT OF LICENSI NG PO LICY CUMULATIVE IMPA CT AREAS 79 - 114 POST CONSULTATION REPORT - DIGBETH AREA

Report of the Acting Director of Regulation and Enforcement.

8 LICENSING AND PUBLIC PROTECTION COMMITTEE MINUTE TAKING 115 - 118 AND PAPERLESS REPORTS

Report of the Acting Director of Regulation and Enforcement.

9 PROSECUTIONS AND CAUTIONS JULY 2016 119 - 138 Report of the Acting Director of Regulation and Enforcement.

10 OUTCOME OF APPEALS A GAINST SUB COMMITTEE DECISIONS 139 - 142 AUGUST 2016

Report of the Acting Director of Regulation and Enforcement.

11 FIXED PENALTY NOTICES ISSUED AUGUST 2016 143 - 150 Report of the Acting Director of Regulation and Enforcement.

12 SCHEDULE OF OUTSTANDING MINUTES 151 - 152

13 OTHER URGENT BUSINESS

To consider any items of business by reason of special circumstances (to be specified) that in the opinion of the Chairman are matters of urgency.

14 AUTHORITY TO CHAIRMAN AND OFFICERS

Chairman to move:-

'In an urgent situation between meetings, the Chair jointly with the relevant Chief Officer has authority to act on behalf of the Committee'.

15 EXCLUSION OF THE PUBLIC

That in view of the nature of the business to be transacted which includes exempt information of the category indicated the public be now excluded from the meeting:-

Minutes - Exempt Paragraph 3

Page 2 of 152

P R I V A T E A G E N D A

16 MINUTES

Item Description

17 OTHER URGENT BUSINESS (EXEMPT INFORMATION)

To consider any items of business by reason of special circumstances (to be specified) that in the opinion of the Chairman are matters of urgency.

Page 3 of 152

Page 4 of 152

BIRMINGHAM CITY COUNCIL

LICENSING AND PUBLIC PROTECTION COMMITTEE 14 SEPTEMBER 2016

MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE LICENSING AND PUBLIC PROTECTION COMMITTEE HELD ON WEDNESDAY 14 SEPTEMBER 2016 AT 1000 HOURS IN COMMITTEE ROOM 6, COUNCIL HOUSE, BIRMINGHAM

PRESENT: - Councillor Barbara Dring in the Chair;

Councillors Nawaz Ali, Bob Beauchamp, Lynda Clinton, Neil Eustace, Des Flood, Jayne Francis, Nagina Kauser, Mike Leddy, Gareth Moore, Habib Rehman and Rob Sealey

*************************************

NOTICE OF RECORDING

713 The Chair advised that the meeting would be webcast for live and subsequent broadcast via the Council’s internet site (www.birminghamnewsroom.com) and that members of the press/public may record and take photographs.

The whole of the meeting would be filmed except where there were confidential or exempt items. ______

APOLOGIES

714 Apologies were received from Councillors Alex Buchanan, Basharat Dad and Penny Holbrook for their inability to attend the meeting. ______

MINUTES OF THE LAST MEETING – 13 JULY 2016

Matters arising

715 A point was raised by Councillor Gareth Moore with regard to page 485 of the Minutes held on 13 July, namely that where the Conditions mentioned the requirements for marshals, the location and numbers should be noted, not just the wearing of jackets. Members agreed to note the revised Minutes.

That, subject to the above amendment, the public Minutes of the meeting held on 13 July, having been previously circulated to Members were noted. Page 5 of 152 492 Licensing and Public Protection Committee – 14 September 2016

______

LICENSING AND PUBLIC PROTECTION – BUDGET MONITORING 2016/17 (MONTH 04)

The following report of the Acting Director of Regulation and Enforcement and Strategic Director of Finance and Legal was submitted:-

(See Document No. 4)

David Jones, Finance Manager, introduced the report, and highlighted the salient points – in particular regarding the £800,000 pressure on the year forecast, cost-cutting, the Coroner’s Inquest into the Pub Bombings, Pest Control, the Registry Office, the Licensing budget and savings regarding Animal Welfare.

Councillor Nawaz Ali asked a question about table 5.1 and depreciation, and also 5.4 and what the review had entailed. Councillor Gareth Moore raised a question about the variations in the Licensing budget for Hackney Carriages, and also Dog Wardens.

David Jones responded to Members’ satisfaction regarding the depreciation budget, the budget for the Coroner’s Inquest and the variations in the Licensing budget.

In response to a point raised by Councillor Gareth Moore regarding funding from Corporate Resources, the Finance Director confirmed that he would seek clarification.

It was -

716 RESOLVED:-

(i) That the latest Revenue budget position at the end of July 2016 (Month 4) and Forecast Outturn as detailed in Appendix 1 be noted;

(ii) that the position with regard to the Savings Programme for 2016/17 as detailed in Appendix 2 be note;

(iii) that the expenditure on grant funded and Proceeds of Crime funded programmes in Appendix 3; and

(iv) that the position on reserves and balances, as detailed in Appendix 4 be noted ______

CODE OF CONDUCT FOR MEMBERS AND OFFICERS

The following report of the Acting Service Director of Regulation and Enforcement was submitted:-

Page 6 of 152 493 Licensing and Public Protection Committee – 14 September 2016

(See Document No. 5)

Emma Rohomon, Licensing Operations Manager, introduced the presentation and advised on various aspects of the Code, including regarding exertion of influence by Members (including provision of character references).

She addressed queries raised by Members regarding ‘cross questioning’ between applicant and objector, and also about the applicability of the Code.

In response to a question raised by Councillor Lynda Clinton she confirmed that the Code will be circulated to all Members and in due course it will be put before Full Council for approval in the normal manner.

It was -

717 RESOLVED:-

(i) That the Draft Code of Conduct for Members and Officers of the Licensing Committee at Appendix 1 be approved;

(ii) that the Committee recommend the adoption of the Code by way of ratification by Full Council as part of revisions to the Constitution;

(iii) that the necessary revisions to the Constitution as detailed in paragraph 5.9 be presented to the Council Business Management Committee to be considered for inclusion in the Constitution; and

(iv) that outstanding minute 618(ii) be discharged. ______

TRADING STANDARDS SERVICE NEW OPERATING MODEL

The following report of the Acting Service Director of Regulation and Enforcement was submitted:-

(See Document No. 6)

Sajeela Naseer, Head of Trading Standards, introduced the presentation and outlined the new Operating Structure in the context of reduced workforce and budget. She responded to Members’ comments regarding updates on enforcement action, Citizens’ Advice Bureaux, examples of precedent/ template forms for use in Small Claims. Regarding a Highways issue, relating to encroachment onto the highway by car traders, she confirmed that this was currently under review at strategic level.

In response to an observation from Councillor Mike Leddy she confirmed that the graphs within Document No. 6 would be improved.

718 RESOLVED:-

That the report be noted . ______Page 7 of 152 494 Licensing and Public Protection Committee – 14 September 2016

PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE KNOWLEDGE TEST FOR PRIVATE HIRE DRIVERS

The following report of the Acting Director of Regulation and Enforcement was submitted:-

(See Document No. 7)

Chris Arundel, Principal Licensing Officer, presented the proposed Amendments and responded appropriately to Member questions about the differences in the Knowledge Test and purpose of the changes. An officer from Licensing also attended to address questions about how the test would be conducted in practice. Officers were keen to assure Members that the examples given in the Report were not actual questions to be used in the Test.

719 RESOLVED:-

That Committee

i. Approves the style and format of the new Knowledge Test for Private Hire Drivers.

ii. Approves the style, format and introduction of a new section for customer service orientated questions.

iii. Agrees the proposed start date of 3 October 2016 . ______

IMPLICATIONS OF CASEY REPORT FOR LICENSING

The following report of the Acting Service Director of Regulation and Enforcement was submitted:-

(See Document No. 8)

Chris Neville, Head of Licensing, introduced the report and responded to Member comments about the implications of the Casey Report for Licensing.

Members noted that in light of the outstanding action points / target completion dates, the draft Report ought only to be accepted as an Interim Report. Members were content to agree the Recommendations set out in the Report on the basis that a new Minute would be drafted, requesting that officers come back to report to Committee on the outstanding actions set out in Appendix 2.

It was –

720 RESOLVED:-

(i) That outstanding Minute No. 599(ii) be discharged;

(ii) That the Action Plan be approved; and

Page 8 of 152 495 Licensing and Public Protection Committee – 14 September 2016

(iii) that the Acting Service Director of Regulation and Enforcement be requested to report further on the outstanding actions set out in Appendix 2 of the report. ______

LICENSING AUTHORITY POLICIES, PROCEDURES AND DELEGATIONS CORRECTION (VERSION 2016/2)

The following report of the Acting Director of Regulation and Enforcement was submitted:-

(See Document No. 9)

Emma Rohomon, Licensing Operations Manager, introduced the presentation and rehearsed the content of paragraph 4 within the Report, relating to:

(a) Renewal of a drivers licence after the late renewal period where the circumstances for the lateness are on medical grounds only and (b) Consideration of suitability of evidence as to good character where the applicant is from a failed state and cannot comply with requirement to provide a DBS.(Criminal Record Check)

721 RESOLVED:-

That the the amendment to the Policies, Procedures and Delegations Report as version 2016/2 be agreed. ______

UPDATE ON BIRMINGHAM BUILDING WATCH

The following report of the Acting Director of Regulation and Enforcement was submitted:-

(See Document No. 10)

Russell Davey, Environmental Health Officer, introduced the report and highlighted the salient points, and responded appropriately to Member comments on derelict buildings, for example abandoned public houses, and the associated anti-social behaviour and general blight that is associated with such buildings. Mark Croxford, Head of Environmental Health, confirmed to Members that officers would consider devising an Action Plan regarding derelict buildings.

722 RESOLVED:-

That on the basis that the Head of Environmental Health would consider an Action Plan, that the report be noted. ______

Page 9 of 152 496 Licensing and Public Protection Committee – 14 September 2016

OUTBREAK OF CRYPTOSPORIDIOSIS AT COCKS MOOR WOODS LEISURE CENTRE

The following report of the Acting Director of Regulation and Enforcement was submitted:-

(See Document No. 11)

Nick Lowe, Operations Manager (Food), introduced the report and responded to Members comments regarding the Pool Management Course and also the arrangements that apply for non-City Council pools .

723 RESOLVED:-

That the report be noted. ______

PROSECUTIONS AND CAUTIONS DURING MAY AND JUNE 2016

The following report of Alison Harwood, the Acting Director of Regulation and Enforcement was submitted:-

(See Document No. 12)

Alison Harwood introduced the report and highlighted the significant cases, notable sentences and media coverage. Councillor Gareth Moore and Councillor Habib Rehman passed on their thanks to officers for action taken.

724 RESOLVED:-

That the report be noted. ______

OUTCOME OF APPEALS AGAINST SUB COMMITTEE DECISIONS DURING JULY 2016

The following report of the Acting Director of Regulation and Enforcement was submitted:-

(See Document No. 13)

Chris Neville, Head of Licensing, introduced the report and provided Members with the salient points of the only matter for the relevant period.

725 RESOLVED:-

That the report be noted. ______

Page 10 of 152 497 Licensing and Public Protection Committee – 14 September 2016

ACTIONS TAKEN BY THE CHIEF OFFICER IN CONSULTATION WITH CHAIR OF LICENSING AND PUBLIC PROTECTION COMMITTEE DURING JULY AND AUGUST 2016

The following report of the Acting Director of Regulation and Enforcement was submitted:-

(See Document No. 14)

Chris Neville, Head of Licensing, introduced the report and highlighted the cases set out within paragraphs 5.1 and 5.2 of the Report. Mark Croxford, Head of Environmental Health, addressed members on the matter set out at paragraph 4.

726 RESOLVED:-

That the report be noted. ______

FIXED PENALTY NOTICES ISSUED MAY, JUNE AND JULY 2016

The following report of the Acting Director of Regulation and Enforcement was submitted:-

(See Document No. 15)

Mark Croxford, Head of Environmental Health, addressed members on the salient points and in particular the nuisance caused by litter on a ward by ward basis.

727 RESOLVED:-

That the report be noted. ______

SCHEDULE OF OUTSTANDING MINUTES

The following schedule of Outstanding Minutes was submitted:-

(See Document No. 16)

The Acting Director of Regulation and Enforcement made comments on Outstanding Minutes as follows:-

That Outstanding Minute No. 365, which is linked to another Report, be put back to November for consultation.

That Outstanding Minute No. 603 be put back to January 2017.

That the Outstanding Minute relating to Shisha premises be put back to October 2017.

Page 11 of 152 498 Licensing and Public Protection Committee – 14 September 2016

That Outstanding Minute No. 620 relating to Sexual Entertainment Venues be put back as a further meeting is pending which will enable it to be discharged.

In respect of Outstanding Minute No. 633 the post could now restored as funding had been made available and the Outstanding Minute could be discharged.

728 RESOLVED:-

That Outstanding Minutes Nos. 599 (ii), 618 (ii) and 633 be discharged and all other Outstanding Minutes be continued ______

OTHER URGENT BUSINESS

The Chairman was of the opinion that the following matters could be considered as matters of urgency in view of the need to expedite consideration thereof and instruct officers to act if necessary.

A. Tourism Action Plan Proposed Deregulation and Community Alcohol Notices

Emma Rohomon, Licensing Manager, addressed the Members on the national meeting she had attended in London, involving the Home Office and the Department of Transport, in which a ‘Tourism Action Plan’ was proposed which has implications for Private Hire Drivers.

She also addressed the Members on Community Alcohol Notices which had implications for alcohol sales. It had been proposed that small quantities of alcohol could be sold by accommodation providers to their guests, and also at ‘community events’ (to attendees), without the need for any Licence.

It was agreed that officers report to Central Government the Members’ views that: (i) they do not support the proposed deregulation of drivers who work for hotels, for B&Bs, and/or in tourism generally (ii) they strongly object to the proposed deregulation of alcohol licensing

729 RESOLVED:-

That the verbal report be noted and the Head of Licensing arrange for Member views, set out above, to be reported to Central Government. ______

B. Biomass Boilers

730 Councillor Lynda Clinton then raised a question regarding the City’s stance on biomass boilers. In response to this, Mark Croxford confirmed that Mark Wolstencroft, Operations Manager, would confirm the position. ______

Page 12 of 152 499 Licensing and Public Protection Committee – 14 September 2016

AUTHORITY TO CHAIRMAN AND OFFICERS

731 RESOLVED:-

In an urgent situation between meetings, the Chair jointly with the relevant Chief Officer has authority to act on behalf of the Committee. ______

EXCLUSION OF THE PUBLIC

731 RESOLVED:-

That in view of the nature of the business to be transacted which includes exempt information of the category indicated the public be now excluded from the meeting:-

Minutes - Exempt Paragraph 3

Page 13 of 152 500

Page 14 of 152 BIRMINGHAM CITY COUNCIL

REPORT OF THE ACTING DIRECTOR OF REGULATION AND ENFORCEMENT TO THE LICENSING AND PUBLIC PROTECTION COMMITTEE

19 OCTOBER 2016 WARDS AFFECTED: ASTON; EDGBASTON; NECHELLS

SPORTS GROUND SECURITY ARRANGEMENTS

1. Summary

1.1 This report has been prepared at the request of the Licencing and Public Protection Committee to identify the approach to security arrangements for sports grounds.

2. Recommendations

2.1 That the report be noted.

2.2 That the outstanding minute number 640(i) be discharged.

Contact Officer: Alistair Campbell, Head of Resilience & Local Engineering Telephone: 0121 303 7305 E-mail: [email protected]

Page 151 of 152

3. Background

3.1 The Licensing and Public Protection Committee sought assurance that appropriate structures and processes were in place to deliver, as far as was reasonably practicable, the resilience and security arrangements required for the safety of spectators attending sporting venues and of those residents living nearby.

4. Security Preparedness Arrangements for Sports Grounds

4.1 Introduction

4.1.1 The Safety of Sports Grounds Act 1975 defines a sports ground as: ‘A place where sports or other competitive activities take place in the open air, and where accommodation has been provided for spectators, consisting of artificial structures or of natural structures artificially modified for the purpose.’

4.1.2 In support of the Act, the DCMS ‘Guide to Safety at Sports Grounds’ (Commonly known as the Green Guide) applies to the safety of spectators at all sports grounds, including, but not limited to:

• American Football • Athletics • Cricket • Equestrian Events • Football • Golf • Greyhound Racing • Hockey • Horse Racing • Lacrosse • Motor Racing • Polo • Rugby • Speedway Racing • Tennis

4.1.2 Whilst the responsibility for the safety of spectators lies at all times with the sports ground management, due to spectator numbers, some (Designated grounds and stands) require a process of safety certification.

4.2 Safety Certification of Sports Grounds

4.2.1 Safety certificates are required for any sports ground ‘designated’ by the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, with accommodation for more than 10,000 spectators, or in the case of a Premier League and Football League grounds, 5,000 spectators. Safety certificates could also apply to non-league grounds if they have above 5,000 spectators.

4.2.2 The primary purpose of a safety certificate is to set the safe capacity of a designated ground or of a regulated stand at a non–designated ground. In addition to setting the safe capacity the safety certificate will set out the detailed terms and conditions with which the certificate holder must comply if that capacity is to be maintained and this includes the production of contingency plans.

Page 162 of 152

4.2.3 BCC is the lead authority for the issue, review, monitoring and enforcement of safety certification of designated sports grounds under the 1975 Act. Whilst safety certificates are prepared by the Councils Building Control function (ACIVICO), it is BCC Head of Planning, who is responsible for signing-off the certificate and for advising and assisting the certificate holder where necessary.

4.2.4 Guidance offers two possible styles of safety certification, being:

Style 1 A top-down (Prescriptive) approach with the local authority determining the safe capacity of the ground and prescribing and enforcing such terms and conditions it considers necessary to secure the reasonable safety of spectators and to undertake periodic inspections. The conditions/details are determined for a ‘normal’ full capacity ground and the ground operates on this basis even if not full

Style 2 A less direct (Risk Based) approach under which the ground management risk assesses all matters relating to safety (Incl. facilities maintenance; crowd management; stewarding; medical first aid; fire safety), to identify the conditions that it considers necessary to secure the safety of spectators and records them in an operations manual for scrutiny, acceptance and incorporation in a schedule to the safety certificate by the local authority. This produces a methodology that can vary the capacity of the ground and its operating procedures under certain circumstances which has to be agreed with by the local authority.

Note: Whilst neither style is mandatory, Style 2 is considered the modern and preferred option to support public safety.

4.2.5 In conjunction with the sports ground operators, BCC have established a ‘Hybrid’ Safety Certification process for ‘designated’ sports grounds in its area.

4.3 Safety Advisory Groups

4.3.1 Safety Advisory Groups (SAGs) may be established in support of an event, or a venue. This report considers SAGs set-up for the purpose of advising the local authority in relation to safety at the three sports ground venues described in the previous paragraph.

4.3.2 A SAG is not a legal requirement; however SAGs are ‘good practice’ and deliver on the recommendation in the Lord Justice Taylor inquiry in to the Hillsborough Stadium Disaster that:

‘to assist the local authority in exercising its functions, it should set up an ‘advisory group’ consisting of appropriate members of its own staff, representatives of the police, fire & rescue and ambulance services and of the building authority.’

Page 173 of 152

4.3.3 ‘The UK Good Practice Guide to Working in Safety Advisory Groups’ published by the Emergency Planning College and endorsed by Cabinet Office and the SGSA (Sports Ground Safety Authority) sets out the roles, options and limitations of a SAG, which may be established in support of a specific event, a venue, or to consider a broad range of events.

4.3.4 The SAG chair is usually appointed by the local authority, and to ensure the effective and efficient operation of this role, a detailed legal or subject matter knowledge are secondary to the key skills and competencies of communication, diplomacy and interpersonal skills.

4.3.5 The SAG should be underpinned by a quality assurance process describing how the SAG operates e.g. roles and responsibilities; who the core and invited members are, and the policies that support the SAG.

4.3.6 The terms of reference for a SAG are set locally. For a SAG established to advise the local authority in support of sports ground safety certification, the UK Good Practice Guide suggests that the terms of reference may include:

a) To advise the local authority with regards to its functions in relation to safety certification

b) To advise the local authority with regards to its powers under the licencing legislation

c) To advise the local authority in order to ensure high standards of health and safety

d) To promote the principles of sensible risk management and good practice in safety and welfare planning

e) To advise the local authority and/or event organiser in respect of the formulation of appropriate contingency and emergency arrangements

f) To advise the local authority in respect of relevant legislation and guidance

g) To encourage arrangements to be made to minimise disruption to local communities

h) To consider the implications of significant incidents and events relevant to the venue

i) To consider the implications of significant incidents and events relevant to the surrounding areas and facilities

j) To receive reports relevant to debriefs, visits and/or inspections of the venue

Page 184 of 152

4.3.7 The responsibility for the safety of spectators at sports grounds lies at all times with the ground management, usually the owner or lessee of the ground.

4.3.8 The engagement of the local authority, together with police, fire and ambulance services and other representatives at a SAG does not absolve the ground management from its responsibility for the safety of spectators.

4.4 The DCMS ‘Guide to Safety at Sports Grounds’ (5th Edition 2008) (The ‘Green Guide’)

4.4.1 Chapter 3 of The Guide to safety at Sports Grounds guidance considers Management – responsibility and planning for safety. The guidance is directed to the sports ground management who at all times have responsibility for the safety of spectators.

4.4.2 The guidance considers:

Contingency Plans: Prepared by the Sports Ground Management

Emergency Plans: Prepared by Emergency Services and the Local Authority

4.4.3 The guidance recommends that Contingency Plans and Emergency Plans must be compatible and that to achieve this, consultation must take place between ground management, the police, fire and ambulance services, the local health authority and the local authority.

4.4.4 Contingency plans are prepared by the ground management having assessed the risk of an incident occurring such as fire, power cuts, bombs, threats, delayed starts or crowd disorders. It is recommended that these contingency plans are reviewed both annually and following an incident. The guidance states that ‘Exercises to test contingency plans must be staged at least once a year in consultation with the relevant authorities and emergency services.’

4.4.5 Emergency plans are prepared by the emergency services, or to be more specific, Category 1 Responders, who have a duty under the Civil Contingencies Act (CCA) 2004 to assess risk, to take steps to prevent emergencies occurring, and to have in place plans to respond to and recover from emergencies that have occurred.

Note: A ‘Category 1 Responder’ is a term defined under the CCA as a person or body listed in Part 1 of Schedule 1 to the CCA which includes Local Authorities; Environment Agency; Police; Fire & Rescue Service; Ambulance Service and Health Bodies.

4.4.6 In the event of a specific threat to a venue either due to the nature of the event, or from general threats or incidents elsewhere, it may be necessary to search spectators more thoroughly prior to entry. The National Counter Terrorism Security Office (NaCTSO) guide ‘Counter Terrorism Protective

Page 195 of 152

Security for Stadia and Arenas provides a useful resource to stadia/arena management. The guide recommends that:

a) It is the responsibility of the stadia/arena management to prepare a Security Plan compatible with the Contingency Plan.

b) The guidance recommends that Security and Contingency Plans should be reviewed regularly, rehearsed and exercised. Whenever possible, exercises should be conducted in conjunction with emergency services and the local authority.

4.5 Additional Support and Guidance

4.5.1 Following incidents in France in 2015, NaCTSO with the SGSA reviewed previous security advice and released updated information specifically developed for sports grounds. The guidance included the following points:

a) Consider developing a dynamic lock-down procedure if one is not already in place.

b) Review access control and screening (searching) arrangements for pedestrians and vehicles.

c) Ensure that all visitors are identified and signed-in according to the agreed policies and procedures.

d) Ensure that all external access points and openings to the sports ground are secured and monitored.

e) Conduct a search of the sports ground and immediate environment pre event and post event.

f) Encourage a “challenge culture”, stop and challenge those without identification and report unusual or suspicious behaviour.

g) Re-brief stewards and security personnel on all security procedures, and reinforce the message that staff should be vigilant and report suspicious behaviour.

h) Review the staff training programme for all employees to include the contingency planning responses, evacuation and invacuation, searching and first aid.

i) The “Stay Safe” principles (Run Hide Tell) explained in guidance contained on the NaCTSO website, provide simple actions to consider.

j) Consider searching policies and inform spectators of any limits to number and size of bags and if searches will slow down their entry.

k) Consider monitoring social media and live news feeds in the control room.

Page 206 of 152

l) Review the NaCTSO guidance for crowded places which can be found on the NaCTSO website.

4.5.2 NaCTSO have made available a tailored workshop for stadia and sporting venue operators designed to highlight the importance of being prepared and having the necessary plans in place to help safeguard staff, visitors and assets.

4.6 Conclusion

4.6.1 Established plans are in place to respond to security and other emergencies within any Birmingham City Council neighbourhood. These plans are held as part of a resilience planning framework outlined in the Civil Contingencies Act 2004, involving the West Midlands Conurbation Local Resilience Forum, the Birmingham Resilience Group and Birmingham City Council’s Resilience Unit. Developed through multi-agency (Category 1, Category 2 and Voluntary Agencies) joint planning and exercising, these plans include, but are not limited to: Rest Centres; Evacuation; Mass Fatalities; Warning and Informing etc.

4.6.2 Contingency Plans developed by the sports ground operators in conjunction with emergency services and the local authority are in place and satisfy the conditions/requirements of the sports ground Safety Certification managed by Birmingham City Council.

4.6.3 Overall, satisfactory contingency and emergency planning arrangements are in place to ensure safety at sports venues and to nearby communities.

4.6.4 Whilst it is not thought necessary for a member of the Birmingham City Council (BCC) Resilience Team to attend all SAG meetings. However, should the SAG require any assistance in understanding/awareness of resilience planning arrangements, then a BCC Resilience Team representative would be available to attend at that time.

4.6.5 It was noted that the existing SAG Terms of Reference were published in January 2013, since that time, ‘The UK Good Practice Guide to Working in Safety Advisory Groups’ was released in January 2015 and should be considered when next the SAG review their terms of reference.

4.7 Associated Documentation

a) Guide to Safety at Sports Grounds (5 th Edition) (DCMS)

b) Counter Terrorism Protective Security Advice for Stadia and Arenas (NaCTSO) (2014)

c) The UK Good Practice Guide to Working in Safety Advisory Groups (January 2015) Emergency Planning College endorsed by SGSA and Cabinet Office)

Page 217 of 152

d) The Sports Grounds Safety Authority (SGSA) advice update for all sports grounds (Dec 2015)

e) Guide to the Safety Certification of Sports Grounds (SGSA)

g) Sports Grounds and Public Events Safety Advisory Group Terms of Reference Guidance Document (Core Cities Group in Association with Institute of Licensing Government Association)

4.8 Associated Legislation

a) Safety of Sports Grounds Act 1975

b) Fire Safety and safety of Places of Sport Act 1987

c) Health and Safety at Work Act 1974

d) Civil Contingencies Act 2004

5. Consultation

5.1 This report is to update members on the arrangements for safety at sports grounds. No consultation has taken place in the production of this report.

6. Implications for Resources

6.1 The safety of sports grounds is managed within the resources available to your Committee.

7. Implications for Policy Priorities

7.1 The issues addressed in this report relate to the City Council priorities associated with creating a cleaner, greener and safer city and providing excellent services.

8. Public Sector Equality Duty

8.1 This report is to update members on the arrangements for safety at sports grounds. It does not affect existing policy and no Equalities impacts have been identified.

ACTING DIRECTOR OF REGULATION AND ENFORCEMENT

Background Papers: list background papers which have been used in writing the report

Page 228 of 152

BIRMINGHAM CITY COUNCIL

REPORT OF THE ACTING DIRECTOR OF REGULATION AND ENFORCEMENT TO THE LICENSING AND PUBLIC PROTECTION COMMITTEE

19 OCTOBER 2016 LADYWOOD

STATEMENT OF LICENSING POLICY – CUMULATIVE IMPACT AREAS POST CONSULTATION REPORT – JOHN BRIGHT STREET AREA

1. Summary

1.1 The City Council as the Licensing Authority is required to determine and publish its Statement of Licensing Policy at least every five years, and keep it under review and make such revisions to it at such times, as it considers appropriate.

1.2 In order to take effect any amended policy must be approved by City Council.

1.3 This is a requirement of the Licensing Act 2003 (‘The Act’).

1.4 The Statement of Licensing Policy includes areas of Special Policy known as Cumulative Impact Policy Areas or (CIPs).

1.5 The purpose of this report is to apprise Members of the results of consultation on the proposal to implement three further CIP areas.

2. Recommendations

2.1 That the Committee consider the responses to the consultation for the area around John Bright Street proposed for CIP.

2.2 That Members consider whether there is sufficient evidence to implement CIP area as proposed.

2.3 That, should Members agree to the proposals in 2.2, Members consider if the CIP should relate to: (i) On sales; (ii) On and Off Sales, or (iii) On and Off Sales and Late Night Refreshment.

2.4 That any proposals agreed to at 2.2 and 2.3 be reflected in a revised Statement of Licensing Policy, to be presented to City Council at the next available opportunity.

Contact Officer: Emma Rohomon, Licensing Manager Telephone: 0121 303 9780 Email: [email protected]

Page 23 of 152

1 3. Background

3.1 The principle of ‘Cumulative Impact’ does not originate from the Licensing Act itself, but from the Statutory Guidance issued by the Home Office as required by s182 of the Act.

3.2 Cumulative Impact is addressed in paragraphs 13.2-13.41of the Revised Guidance (Issued March 2015). The full guidance document can be found at: http://bit.ly/s182Mar2015

3.3 Paragraph 13.29 of the s182 Guidance sets out the steps to be followed when considering a special policy area as follows: • Identify concern about crime and disorder; public safety; public nuisance; or protection of children from harm. • Consider whether there is good evidence that crime and disorder or nuisance are occurring, or whether there are activities which pose a threat to public safety or the protection of children from harm. • If such problems are occurring, identify whether these problems are being caused by the customers of licensed premises, or that the risk of cumulative impact is imminent. • Identify the boundaries of the area where problems are occurring (this can involve mapping where the problems occur and identifying specific streets or localities where such problems arise). • Consult those specified in section 5(3) of the 2003 Act, and subject to the outcome of the consultation, include and publish details of the special policy in the licensing policy statement.

3.4 The review of the Statement of Licensing Policy in April 2015 resulted in the CIP areas of Broad Street and Hurst St/Arcadian being extended in scope to include late night refreshment and off-sales as well as the existing on-sales.

3.5 Following the consultation carried out as part of the review of the Statement of Licensing Policy four areas of the City were suggested as being appropriate to be considered as Cumulative Impact Policy areas, being Digbeth, Erdington, the ‘Balti Triangle’ and the area around John Bright Street.

3.6 In order to satisfy the requirements specified by the s182 Guidance (as detailed in paragraph 3.1 above) officers made preliminary enquiries via email with Local Policing Units, Ward Councillors and, in the case of Digbeth, the Chair of the Resident’s association.

3.7 The matters concerning John Bright Street were discussed at the time of the Licensing and Public Protection Committee in April 2015, whereupon it was agreed by the Committee that a CIP did appear to be merited, although the matter had not been subject to public consultation. For this reason, preliminary enquiries were not considered necessary.

3.8 Following these preliminary enquiries it was agreed to proceed with more extensive consultation in relation to the areas of John Bright Street, Digbeth and Erdington. Page 24 of 152

2 4. Consultation

4.1 Summaries of responses to the consultation for the John Bright Street Area are attached at Appendix 1(a) to (d) to this report.

4.2 Consultation questionnaires were circulated to the relevant Ward Councillors, Responsible Authorities, holders of existing premises licences in the proposed areas and resident groups (where known). The consultations were also included on BeHeard.

4.3 Owing to the low number of responses, the consultation was extended by a further 2 weeks with email sent reminders where possible.

5. Results of Consultation

5.1. Of the responses received (10) Nine were in favour of the proposed CIP.

5.2 All of the responses which expressed a preference were in favour of On, Off and Late Night Refreshment Sales being included.

5.3 West Midlands Police do not support the proposal.

6. Matters for Consideration

6.1 There were disappointingly low response rates to these consultations, despite the consultation period being extended.

6.2 Members are reminded of the considerations detailed in paragraph 3.3 above when considering whether there is sufficient evidence provided to justify the implementation of these CIP areas.

6.3 On 23 rd September 2016, the Home Office announced an amendment to the Policing and Crime Bill currently going through parliament concerning, among other things, Cumulative Impact. An extract of this announcement is at Appendix 2.

6.4 At the time of writing this report, the detail of the clauses was not available; however, it is useful to note that there is nothing within the proposals to contradict the manner in which your Committee has administered matters of Cumulative Impact.

6.5 A further report will be brought to your Committee outlining all of the implications of the Policing and Crime Bill following Royal Assent.

Page 25 of 152

3 7. Implications for Resources

7.1 The cost of devising and maintaining a Statement of Licensing Policy, including revisions and amendments, is included within the existing Licence fee structure.

8. Implications for Policy Priorities

8.1 The issues addressed in this report relate to the City Council priorities associated with creating a cleaner, greener and safer city and providing excellent services, as well as laying the foundations for a prosperous city, built on an inclusive economy; Involving local people and communities in the future of their local area and their public services – a city with local services for local people.

9. Public Sector Equality Duty

9.1 Section 5 of the Licensing Act 2003 requires the Licensing Authority to publish a Statement of Licensing Policy. Section 5(3) of the Act specifies those who must be consulted on the Policy and subsequent Policy reviews.

9.2 There are no likely adverse consequences on any person who falls within the definition of a protected characteristic.

ACTING DIRECTOR OF REGULATION AND ENFORCEMENT

Background Papers: Nil

Page 26 of 152

4 APPENDIX 1(a)

JOHN BRIGHT STREET CONSULTATION RESPONSES (SUMMARY)

Do you believe a CIP is necessary for Should the CIP extend beyond on sales to the proposed area? include off sales/late night refreshment? 1 Yes Not stated

2 Yes On and Off Sales and Late Night Refreshment

3 Yes On and Off Sales and Late Night Refreshment

4 Yes On and Off Sales and Late Night Refreshment

5 Yes On and Off Sales and Late Night Refreshment

6 Yes On and Off Sales and Late Night Refreshment

7 Yes Not stated

8 Yes Not stated

9 No Not required

10 Yes On and Off Sales and Late Night Refreshment

Page 27 of 152

5 APPENDIX 1(b)

CONSULTATION RESPONSES - EVIDENCE

Response 2 : Evidence The John Bright Street (JBS) residential development began in earnest in 2001 and today boasts the highest density of residential units in Birmingham city centre- 700 plus apartment units over a small area bounded by John Bright Street, Lower Severn Street, Navigation Street and Suffolk Street Queensway- together the residents of Westside One, West Two, Orion and Sirius contribute to the vibrancy of Birmingham city centre living, and are comprised of professionals, city centre workers, academics, families with young infants.

The City Council set out the Big City Plan and the vision for JBS is for trendy café society. Over the past four years, the Council granted license and planning applications to successive bars with heavy emphasis on alcohol at its business heart – the area already had The Railway Bar, Select and Save late night licence, The Victoria and the Island Bar to begin with, and then saw the opening of Brewdog, Cherry Red, Turtle Bay, The Stable Bar, and soon the Easy Hotel and another two new bars. Some of these sit directly below residential units.

In the short time, the JBS neighbourhood has been transformed into a night time economy, with local media hailing ‘John Bright Street has found its roots again’ and local residents describing it as ‘Broad Street style drinking strip’.

Over the past years, residents have met with Sir Albert Bore, Councillors Kath Hartley and Carl Rice, senior members of the licensing section, Highway Agency, Environmental section and West Midlands Police to work through all the problems that the night time economy has brought to the residential area.

These issues are well known to the City Council: (1) Significant crowd gathering blocking up John bright Street- which is the sole road access for 600 plus residents (of Orion and Sirius) driving in and out of our apartments. This poses risks to drunk pedestrians gathering in the middle of JBS, as well as difficulty for residents to drive in and out, who have repeatedly endured hostility from the drunken crowd as we manoeuvre and meander past the crowd on the narrow street. The Crowd brings excessive noise at night and disorderly behaviour, littering to the area. The local businesses have neither control nor responsibility for the crowd on the street. The crowd then acts as a nidus to attract other crowds from other areas, and the homeless have targeted the area as a result of this.

Page 28 of 152

6 (2) Illegal parking- private cars, taxis and cabs are parked illegally especially on weekend evenings right through the night. This again blocks access for 600 plus residents who have no other means of getting in and out of our apartments. The West Midlands Police have done their best to enforce the law but they do not have the resource to be there every weekend and all through the night, nor should this be their duty. We have worked over the two years with various parties at the Council but to date, no solution has been found. The area is beyond supersaturation and cannot accommodate any more crowd – and yet a new hotel and two other bars have already been allowed to open up in the near future. The Council has no contingency plan on crowd and vehicular control for the additional crowds and cars the new premises will draw.

(3) The residents are mostly professionals and many have young families. City centre living contributes greatly to the vibrancy of an up and coming city such as Birmingham. These increasing number of alcoholic premises bring much noise and disruption to our sleep and some residents have already been forced to move elsewhere. The area is heavily littered at the end of the night. The bottling up of these premises at unsocial hours again serve only to disrupt sleep.

The plight of the residents and the lack of easy solution are clearly outlined in the minutes of the Council meetings held over the past few years. We plead with the Council to impose the cumulative Impact policy for this area as soon as possible, which will at least curb the relentless opening up of more alcohol-selling premises while allowing the Council to continue to work to help us solve the current issues. Thank you

Response 3: Evidence As Per Response 2 ( identical responses submitted)

Response 4: Evidence I moved into the Orion Building 2 years ago, and at the time it seemed like a reasonably nice area – hairdressers and salon below the building, couple of pubs, restaurants. I was told that the street noise would be tolerable, even at night. At the time, I found it quite challenging on Friday and Saturday nights during the summer – so much screaming and noise from the bars that it was impossible to sleep with an open window and difficult with it closed.

Since then, things have gotten consistently worse. We have been invited to submit comments on multiple licensing applications and I have raised objections each and every time. Despite the concerns of the residents, every single application has been approved. Night noise has grown and grown, there is vomit on the streets, there has been an exponential rise in the numbers of homeless and beggars, and it’s not even safe to walk in the area in the morning due to the drunken stragglers. I’ve watched the front door of the building be hammered down and trying to drive in and out of my home is a terrifyingly stressful experience with hordes of drunken revellers staggering across my path. I have not been trained in ram raiding of crowds by the police, so it just makes living in the area miserable.

I am quite stunned that BCC have chosen to turn this area into a pure entertainment zone. At a time when most cities are encouraging gentrification and rejuvenation of Page 29 of 152

7 the city centre by encouraging residential development and increasing safety, the Council has instead chosen to make it rougher, more treacherous, more filthy and an unpleasant environment to live in.

Response 5: Evidence The developments that I manage have a single point of access for vehicles at the end of John Bright Street which means that everyone is required to travel along this road.

Over the last few years the area has deteriorated and this means that there are regularly incidents of anti-social behaviour along John Bright Street and this includes; ° Smash bottles along the road and pathways. ° Public urination against our development. ° Refuse bins left outside our premises that belong to the local bars. ° Furniture being left outside. ° Deliveries at all times of the day outside of that which is permitted. ° Glass bottles being placed in the refuse bins as late as 4.20am and refuse collections as early as 5.30am. This can mean that there is a very small window without noise for people to sleep. This is made worse during this time of the year as ideally people want to be able to have their windows open but this is unfortunately not possible with the timings and level of noise from the street below.

We have challenged license holders along John Bight Street on several of these items and they often feel it isn't our business or tell us it happens outside of their premises and so it isn't their responsibility.

We have tried to work with a number of the premises and have offered them the use of storage areas on the development yet they do not use them and regularly leave their refuse bins outside 24 hours a day seven days a week.

I am aware that Chris Neville is currently completing a review of the details of the individual licenses and think that this needs to be public so that we can them remind local businesses of these. We are very keen to work with the local council and businesses but feel that currently that a few of the local businesses are not as keen to work as a collective.

I have attached pictures of the surrounding areas as well as images which have be taken from google maps to show how in a short period the area has deteriorated quickly. (photographs attached separately as Appendix 1(C)

Response 6: Evidence As the head of our local pubwatch I think it is important that John Bright Street maintains a good resident-business relationship. While I would hope new applicants would respect this, I would like to see a guarantee in their application. I would, however, like to see independent businesses supported in their applications as I would worry this would put them off, and we would like to see more independent businesses. Page 30 of 152

8 CIP should cover Off sales as well, as we have a major issue with begging on the street and newsagents etc sell to those prone to antisocial behaviour, sitting on benches, drinking, harassing customers.

Response 7: Evidence Southside supports the inclusion of cumulative impact areas for Digbeth and John Bright Street. Since Southside was granted its cumulative impact area, we have seen businesses setting up outside the usual NTE areas which now have these policies, causing issues with ASB and night time policing. We urge you to implement these areas for the comfort of the local residents and to ensure the efficacy of city centre policing in the night time economy.

Response 8: Evidence - Public Health Attached Separately as Appendix 1(d)

Response 9: Evidence - West Midlands Poli ce Superintendent Parsons: The reason we are not requesting a CIP for the John Bright street area is that there is insufficient evidence of increased demand being placed on policing resources. This is not the case with the other CIP areas where the justification remains necessary and proportionate in view of the calls for service generated.

Response 10 : Evidence – Environmental Health There has been an increase in the residential aspect of the area, many schemes incorporating a mixed use element, aspects of which are premises which have licensable activities. Combined with existing licensable uses within the area this has given rise to the following issues:

- Noise from patrons leaving licensed premises late in the evening / early in the morning, typically when having had too much to drink - Noise from managing waste stores (consider emptying bottles into bins at various hours) - Odour from extraction systems - Litter arising from patrons of licensed premises, increasingly predisposed to drop litter due to inebriation - Anti-social behaviour, including urination and defecation in public places, by persons who have frequented licensed premises (not directly dealt with by EH Officers but we are aware of the problems from discussions with partner agencies and residents / businesses in the area)

Page 31 of 152

9 APPENDIX 1(d)

BIRMINGHAM PUBLIC HEALTH – RESPONSE – CIZ CONSULATION; JOHN BRIGHT STREET JUNE 2016

1. Do you believe a Cumulative Impact Policy is necessary for the area shown below (see map)?

Yes.

2. If so, what are your reasons for this? (continue on separate sheet if needed)

1. There are 32 licenses available or currently operating within the defined area. Included in this collective are 3 off licenses sales and 29 on premises sales in an area of 0.074 square kilometres.

8 of these licenses are currently 24 hour 7 days a week operation. Two of the 3 off licenses are operating 24 hours, 7 days a week

Public Health suggest that the number of outlets in the area and the ease or convenience (especially with long open hours) at which alcohol can be obtained can increase greater alcohol consumption and consequently make alcohol more normal, acceptable and frequent excessive consumption more accessible within the area. This then exacerbates alcohol-related problems.

2. Economic growth is increasing in that area and Public Health recognises that a strong economy and sustainable jobs for Birmingham residents is good for public health and therefore there is the need for such growth in the locality, for the city centre and Birmingham as a whole. However, Public Health is concerned that this economic growth appears to be solely limited to premises that are solely related to alcohol sales or whose sale of alcohol is a major element of the growth.

3. The proposed CIZ is surrounded by the Hurst street CIZ to the south; Broad street CIZ to the north; new street station to the east and therefore the only geographical area available for displacement is the west of this proposed site

4. One factor that is likely to heighten the risk of increased consumption is the relationship between density and price. Where there are high numbers of outlets bunched in a small geographical area, there is a greater likelihood of the discounting of alcohol products as means of outlets competing with one another. Lower prices increase demand for alcohol and thereby facilitate heavier consumption. There are currently 2 x 24 hour opening off licenses that currently have a high proportion of the off license sales dedicated to high strength (above 6.5%ABV) inexpensive alcohol, which includes the offering for sale of singles cans of such alcohol sold at pocket money prices of 99p. Public Health counted as a snapshot in one day, within the daytime, 6 separate units of homeless, rough sleeping/ begging persons within the defined area. 2 of these units were witnessed drinking alcohol. There was no indication where the alcohol was purchased from. Evidence from treatment services in the area (see below)

Page 32 of 152

10 suggests that those that use their services are more likely to drink high strength strong alcohol. The presence of such persons in an area can potentially increase their own vulnerability as well as potentially contribute to crime and disorder.

3. Please provide any evidence you may have to support your answers. (This can include incidents / issues / crime data, antisocial behaviour incidents etc)

Public Health aims to maximise the opportunities for the wider and social determinants of health to be reflected in the existing four licensing objectives – given that we are a Public Health Local Authority, and in the absence of a fifth Public Health objective.

Public Health have developed an Alcohol Licensing Tool, that consolidates the following data* to provide a report on the impact of alcohol at postcode level for any new application or review. *Data: Alcohol related Crime and Disorder (West Midlands Police), Alcohol related callouts (West Midlands Ambulance Service), Alcohol Related Fires (West Midlands Fire Service), Existing Licensed Premises, Alcohol related Hospital Admissions, Premature Mortality relating to Alcohol, Numbers of Harmful and Hazardous Drinkers, Number of People Accessing Alcohol Treatment Services.

The licensing authority recognises the impact of alcohol misuse in Birmingham, and it is hoped that through the implementation of this Licensing Policy the promotion of the four Licensing Objectives will in turn have a positive effect on preventing alcohol misuse in the city and reducing harmful and hazardous drinking. For example, by ensuring licensed premises refuse sales of alcohol to children, or those attempting to purchase it on behalf of children, this will impact positively on a reduction in child alcohol-related health problems. To include off-licence premises within cumulative impact zones to reduce the opportunity for pre-loading, access to cheap alcohol and on-street drinking, especially in underage and vulnerable groups. Additionally, by preventing the use of illegal drugs on licensed premises, it is hoped this might reduce combined alcohol and drug misuse, which is an issue for any city. Through ensuring the responsible selling of alcohol, this may impact on reducing a person’s drinking at harmful or hazardous levels. However, it is recognised that any such positive impact will be as a coincidence of the licensing authority conducting its licensing function under the Act to promote the Licensing Objectives.

The John bright street CIZ includes the site of the central operating site for Reach out Recovery. Reach Out Recovery (CGL) are commissioned by Birmingham Public Health to deliver alcohol and substance misuse treatment services in Birmingham. CGL report that “Over the last 6 months (Dec15 – May16), the service assessed and started interventions with 696 service users reporting alcohol use (46% of all service users starting structured interventions). Of these, 562 reported alcohol as the main substance bringing them to Reach Out Recovery. All service users receiving interventions for Drug or Alcohol addiction may need to attend at Scala House for various parts of their treatment intervention. Attendance at Scala House is a necessity for any service users reporting high alcohol or high risk drug use as they are required to have a medical assessment and/or appointment with a health professional. This requirement is determined at point of assessment. · At Scala House service users access a range of interventions each month including (number of service users on average each month); 378 attending medical appointments, 66 attending Phase 2 (low intervention) groups, 91 having contact with housing support, 50 attending the Welcome Group. The service also operates a reception for any drop-ins to sign-post for different areas of support e.g. Housing, Employment, changes to treatment e.g. prescribing, Needle Exchange.

Page 33 of 152

11 · There are also Recovery focused groups running at the service that have a high attendance rate however the focus is around observing abstinence especially with the service users accessing the detox programme in service.”

Sifa Fireside has a strong representation within the area of the proposed CIZ. They see the direct effects of alcohol, and they are concerned about the proliferation of on-licences and off-licences in Birmingham. They are most concerned about the impact and availability of high alcohol content/low price. They consider the opportunity for a CIZ to be one that can assist in reducing the number of off licences, and possibly start to drive forward conditions of licence that can regulate against alcohol products with high alcohol content/low price.

“Although I have no specific information on the outlets selling high strength alcohol in town I am in no doubt that it is widely available in outlets in the city centre or those immediately outside the city (Digbeth being an example).

Our particular client group tend to favour the strong white cider which can be purchased in 1 litre and 3 litre bottles at very low prices. To put this into some perspective : a 70cl bottle of spirits containing 28 units of alcohol typically costs between £ 10-13 while a 3 litre bottle of white cider containing 22.5 units of alcohol can be bought for £4 or £5.00. In short. very dangerous amounts of alcohol can be consumed for no more than £ 5.00 and is widely available in newsagents and supermarkets”.

“For this reason, many people have advocated a minimum unit pricing of 50 pence per unit as based on this pricing, a 3 litre bottle of white cider would cost about £ 11.25 and not £4. I think this price difference would certainly restrict drinking for some. The widespread availability of very high strength alcohol at low prices is certainly something to factor in when considering strategies for managing dangerous consumption and the development of dependency. Restricting the availability of such alcohol in outlets around the city is an additional factor to consider when addressing the problem of dangerous drinking in the area and the antisocial behaviour that often follows on from such drinking.”

Recommendations for model voluntary conditions for future off sales of alcohol (shops) within the proposed CIZ

Model Voluntary conditions Off sales of alcohol (shops) no beer, lager cider or spirit mixtures over 5.5% ABV to be sold no single cans or bottles of beer, lager cider or spirit mixtures to be sold no miniature bottles of spirits to be sold sales area to be no more than (15% ) of premises to be used for alcohol no self-service of spirits signage to be prominently displayed of times alcohol available refusals of alcohol sales to be recorded till prompts to be activated on all alcohol sales Proof of age

Page 34 of 152

To assist Public Health in responding to alcohol licensing applications, they have developed an alcohol tool which uses variable geographical levels of information that is available in Birmingham.

We have run the postcodes that fall within the proposed CIZ through the tool, and the findings are quite alarming. Based upon the outcomes of the toolkit report, if Public Health was to receive an application from one of these postcode areas, we would be advising against granting a licence. Tier one data (data that is the most localised/granular level). Every post code that falls wholly or partly within the proposed Cumulative Impact Zone area has a score of RED – this would be an advisory from Public Health to not grant a licence. Please see the accompanying Alcohol Toolkit report.

We would be happy to attend a committee meeting to further explain the outcomes of the toolkit analysis of the postcode areas for the proposed CIZ.

There is some guidance below that summarises the attached alcohol toolkit report against the CIZ postcode areas.

Variable geographical levels of information have been used where available, in each case this is based on the post code of the application falling within this larger geographical area. Two terms are less commonly used outside of certain specialist areas and are detailed below:

LSOA (Lower Super Output Area ) is a geographical Census area with an approx. population of 1,500. MSOA (Medium Super Output Area) is a geographical Census area with a approx. population of 8,000. Scores have been calculated by comparing the geographical area in question to the average at a higher level (Birmingham in most instances). 10% margin of error has been applied to both the smaller and larger areas and it is only where these are still relatively different that a RED (more prevalence or risk in area compared to average) or GREEN (less prevalence or risk in area compared to average) score has been calculated. Where these margins for error overlap in any way this has been calculated as AMBER (indifference).

The tool utilises posts codes to generate a score, there are 35 distinct post codes that fall partly or fully within the proposed Cumulative Impact Policy area. These fall within two post code zones (B1 containing 11 post codes, and B5 containing 24).The post code zone B1 is rated RED in terms of alcohol related ambulance activity and B5 is AMBER.

There are multiple LSOAs covering the proposed area, 25 of the 35 post codes fall within LSOAs rated RED for Police Reported Alcohol Incidents (not including Domestic Violence), with the remainder scoring AMBER. All LSOAs are rated RED for Police Reported Domestic Violence, Existing On- Licences, and Existing Off-Licences. There is also a neighbouring Cumulative Impact Policy area and Ladywood District has identified reduction of alcohol related harm as a district priority. There does not appear to be issues in the area with regards Alcohol Related Fire Service Call-outs, Safeguarding, or Underage Sales.

The scores above combine to form an overall “Tier One Data” (being the most accurate and granular data which could be accessed by the Local Authority) for each post code. Every post code that falls wholly or partly within the proposed Cumulative Impact Policy area has a score of RED.

Page 35 of 152

13 APPENDIX 2

EXTRACT FROM EMAIL RECEIVED 23 RD SEPTEMBER 2016 FROM THE HOME OFFICE

Thank you for your help with developing the legislative proposals on cumulative impact and the late night levy over the course of the last year. Many of you attended our workshops and your feedback was very helpful.

I’m writing to let you know that the clauses amending the Late night levy and placing cumulative impact policies on a statutory footing have been tabled in Parliament today, for introduction to the Policing and Crime Bill at Lords Committee. The clauses will be found here shortly (if not there already): http://services.parliament.uk/bills/2016-17/policingandcrime/documents.html

The first Lords Committee debate for the bill took place last week and the alcohol clauses are likely to be debated in mid-late October (date yet to be decided).

[]

Cumulative impact

The aim of putting Cumulative Impact Policies on a statutory footing is to add legal certainty and transparency for applicants, licensing authorities and other responsible authorities on how CIPs are developed and operate. The draft legislation does not require all licensing authorities to consider cumulative impact.

The clause sets out what steps a licensing authority will be required to take before publishing a cumulative impact assessment. The cumulative impact assessment may be published where the licensing authority considers that the number of premises in a particular area is such that granting any further authorisations would be inconsistent with the licensing authority’s duty to promote the licensing objectives, and the licensing authority must set out the evidence for their opinion. Guidance will explain that this is evidence of an emerging or existing problem and will set out the kinds of evidence which licensing authorities may use.

The licensing authority must provide the following information for the consultation: the reasons why it is considering a cumulative impact assessment; the areas which the assessment relates to; and whether the assessment will relate to all premises licences and club premises certificates or only those of a particular kind.

There is a new requirement to review and carry out a consultation on the cumulative impact assessment at least every 3 years, and publish a statement about whether the licensing authority remains of the opinion set out in the assessment. This will also ensure that licensing authorities use robust and up to date evidence to support the implementation and retention of CIPs in their area and as the basis for making decisions. Guidance will explain that licensing authorities are expected to publish the most up to date and relevant evidence on which the cumulative impact assessment is based.

Page 36 of 152

14 Guidance will make it clear that the cumulative impact assessment may be used when considering the variation of existing licences as well as the grant of new licences in the area. As is currently the case with CIPs, a cumulative impact assessment does not create an automatic refusal of a new licence or variation of an existing licence, and licensing authorities, other responsible authorities or other persons will need to make representations in the usual way.

The s.182 guidance will be updated and published when the legislation comes into force.

Page 37 of 152

Page 38 of 152 Page 39 of 152 Page 40 of 152 Page 41 of 152 Page 42 of 152 Page 43 of 152 Page 44 of 152 Page 45 of 152 Page 46 of 152 Page 47 of 152

Page 48 of 152 Ward Tier Premises LSOA Tier Alcohol Related Existing On- Existing Off Cumulative Impact Two Police (Non-DV) Police (DV) Post Code One Score Ambulance Activity Licences Licences Areas Score Post Code Post Zone - Code LSOA - LSOA - LSOA - Post LSOA - Post LSOA - Post Score (0- Zone - Score (0- LSOA - Score (0- LSOA - Score (0- Code - Score (0- Code - Score (0 Code - 2) Count 2) Count 2) Count 2) Count 2) Count or 2) Yes / No B1 1BA RED AMBER 2 36 2 963 2 68 2 0 2 0 2 No B1 1BE RED AMBER 2 36 1 172 2 21 2 1 2 0 2 No B1 1BL RED AMBER 2 36 2 519 2 36 2 2 2 1 2 No B1 1BN RED AMBER 2 36 2 519 2 36 2 4 2 0 2 No B1 1BT RED AMBER 2 36 2 963 2 68 2 1 2 0 2 No B1 1BY RED AMBER 2 36 2 963 2 68 2 0 2 0 2 No B1 1LS RED AMBER 2 36 2 519 2 36 2 0 2 0 2 No B1 1LT RED AMBER 2 36 2 963 2 68 2 0 2 1 2 No B1 1LW RED AMBER 2 36 2 519 2 36 2 0 2 0 2 No B1 1LY RED AMBER 2 36 2 519 2 36 2 0 2 0 2 No B1 1PU RED AMBER 2 36 1 172 2 21 2 0 2 0 2 No B5 4AA RED AMBER 1 10 1 172 2 21 2 1 2 1 2 No B5 4AB RED AMBER 1 10 1 172 2 21 2 0 2 0 2 No B5 4AE RED AMBER 1 10 1 172 2 21 2 0 2 0 2 No B5 4AF RED AMBER 1 10 1 172 2 21 2 0 2 0 2 No B5 4AH RED AMBER 1 10 1 172 2 21 2 0 2 1 2 No B5 4AJ RED AMBER 1 10 1 172 2 21 2 0 2 0 2 No B5 4AL RED AMBER 1 10 2 519 2 36 2 0 2 0 2 No B5 4AN RED AMBER 1 10 2 963 2 68 2 1 2 0 2 No B5 4AW RED AMBER 1 10 1 172 2 21 2 0 2 0 2 No B5 4AX RED AMBER 1 10 1 172 2 21 2 0 2 0 2 No B5 4DA RED AMBER 1 10 2 963 2 68 2 0 2 0 2 No B5 4DS RED AMBER 1 10 2 963 2 68 2 1 2 0 2 No B5 4DT RED AMBER 1 10 2 963 2 68 2 1 2 0 2 No B5 4DY RED AMBER 1 10 2 963 2 68 2 8 2 0 2 No B5 4EB RED AMBER 1 10 2 963 2 68 2 0 2 0 2 No B5 4EG RED AMBER 1 10 2 963 2 68 2 1 2 0 2 No B5 4EJ RED AMBER 1 10 2 963 2 68 2 0 2 0 2 No B5 4EN RED AMBER 1 10 2 963 2 68 2 1 2 0 2 No B5 4EW RED AMBER 1 10 2 963 2 68 2 1 2 0 2 No B5 4LJ RED AMBER 1 10 2 963 2 68 2 1 2 0 2 No B5 4UA RED AMBER 1 10 2 963 2 68 2 0 2 0 2 No B5 4UB RED AMBER 1 10 2 963Page 49 2of 152 68 2 0 2 0 2 No B5 4US RED AMBER 1 10 2 963 2 68 2 0 2 0 2 No B5 4UU RED AMBER 1 10 2 963 2 68 2 0 2 0 2 No Underage Sales Underage Sales Underage Sales Any Alcohol Specific Liver Disease Fire Services Safeguarding Justified Counterfeit Activity Alcohol Item Deaths Preventable Death Complaints

Page 52 of 152 IRMINGHAM CITY COUNCIL

REPORT OF THE ACTING DIRECTOR OF REGULATION AND ENFORCEMENT TO THE LICENSING AND PUBLIC PROTECTION COMMITTEE

19 OCTOBER 2016 ERDINGTON

STATEMENT OF LICENSING POLICY – CUMULATIVE IMPACT AREAS POST CONSULTATION REPORT – ERDINGTON AREA

1. Summary

1.2 In order to take effect any amended policy must be approved by City Council.

1.3 This is a requirement of the Licensing Act 2003 (‘The Act’).

1.4 The Statement of Licensing Policy includes areas of Special Policy known as Cumulative Impact Policy Areas or (CIPs).

1.5 The purpose of this report is to apprise Members of the results of consultation on the proposal to implement three further CIP areas.

2. Recommendations

2.1 That the Committee consider the responses to the consultation for the Erdington Area proposed for CIP.

2.2 That Members consider whether there is sufficient evidence to implement CIP area as proposed.

2.3 That, should Members agree to the proposals in 2.2, Members consider if the CIP should relate to: (i) On sales; (ii) On and Off Sales, or (iii) On and Off Sales and Late Night Refreshment

2.4 That any proposals agreed to at 2.2 and 2.3 be reflected in a revised Statement of Licensing Policy, to be presented to City Council at the next available opportunity.

Contact Officer: Emma Rohomon, Licensing Manager Telephone: 0121 303 9780 Email: [email protected]

Page 53 of 152

1 3. Background

3.1 The principle of ‘Cumulative Impact’ does not originate from the Licensing Act itself, but from the Statutory Guidance issued by the Home Office as required by s182 of the Act.

3.2 Cumulative Impact is addressed in paragraphs 13.2-13.41of the Revised Guidance (Issued March 2015). The full guidance document can be found at: http://bit.ly/s182Mar2015

3.8 Following these preliminary enquiries it was agreed to proceed with more extensive consultation in relation to the areas of John Bright Street, Digbeth and Erdington. Page 54 of 152

2 4. Consultation

4.1 A summary of responses to the consultation for the Erdington Area is attached at Appendix 1(a) to this report, with comments attached at Appendix 1(b)-(d).

4.2 Consultation questionnaires were circulated to the relevant Ward Councillors, Responsible Authorities and holders of existing premises licences in the proposed areas. The consultations were also included on BeHeard.

4.3 Owing to the low number of responses, the consultation was extended by a further 2 weeks with email sent reminders where possible.

5. Results of Consultation

5.1 Of the responses received (26); all were in favour of the proposed CIP.

5.2 Of all the responses, 20 were in favour of On, Off and Late Night Refreshment Sales being included, with one preferring just On licences and another opting for ‘on and off’. (3 expressed no preference)

6. Matters for Consideration

6.1 There were disappointingly low response rates to these consultations, despite the consultation period being extended.

6.2 Members are reminded of the considerations detailed in paragraph 3.3 above when considering whether there is sufficient evidence provided to justify the implementation of these CIP areas.

6.5 A further report will be brought to your Committee outlining all of the implications of the Policing and Crime Bill following Royal Assent.

Page 55 of 152

3 7. Implications for Resources

7.1 The cost of devising and maintaining a Statement of Licensing Policy, including revisions and amendments, is included within the existing Licence fee structure.

8. Implications for Policy Priorities

9. Public Sector Equality Duty

9.2 There are no likely adverse consequences on any person who falls within the definition of a protected characteristic.

ACTING DIRECTOR OF REGULATION AND ENFORCEMENT

Background Papers: Nil

Page 56 of 152

4 APPENDIX 1(a)

ERDINGTON CONSULTATION RESPONSES (SUMMARY)

Do you believe a Should the CIP extend CIP is necessary beyond on sales to Please provide any for the proposed If so, what are your include off sales/late evidence to support area? reasons for this? night refreshment? your answer On and Off Sales and 1 yes see attached Late Night Refreshment see attached On and Off Sales and 2 yes none provided Late Night Refreshment see attached On and Off Sales and 3 yes see attached Late Night Refreshment see attached On and Off Sales and 4 yes see attached Late Night Refreshment see attached On and Off Sales and 5 yes see attached Late Night Refreshment see attached On and Off Sales and 6 yes none provided Late Night Refreshment none provided On and Off Sales and 7 yes see attached Late Night Refreshment see attached On and Off Sales and 8 yes none provided Late Night Refreshment none provided On and Off Sales and 9 yes See attached Late Night Refreshment none provided On and Off Sales and 10 yes none provided Late Night Refreshment See attached On and Off Sales and 11 yes none provided Late Night Refreshment none provided On and Off Sales and 12 yes see attached Late Night Refreshment see attached On and Off Sales and 13 yes see attached Late Night Refreshment see attached

14 yes see attached On and Off Sales see attached On and Off Sales and 15 yes see attached Late Night Refreshment see attached

16 yes See attached None stated see attached On and Off Sales and 17 yes see attached Late Night Refreshment see attached

18 yes see attached None stated see attached

19 yes see attached None stated see attached

Page 57 of 152

5 On and Off Sales and 20 yes see attached Late Night Refreshment see attached On and Off Sales and 21 yes see attached Late Night Refreshment see attached On and Off Sales and 22 yes see attached Late Night Refreshment see attached On and Off Sales and 23 yes see attached Late Night Refreshment see attached On and Off Sales and 24 yes see attached Late Night Refreshment see attached On and Off Sales and 25 yes see attached Late Night Refreshment see attached On and Off Sales and 26 yes see attached Late Night Refreshment see attached

Page 58 of 152

6 APPENDIX 1(b)

ERDINGTON CONSULTATION RESPONSES

Response 1: Evidence The pubs and takeaways in Erdington, especially on the high street and roads off this have constant noise. Many residents are afraid to walk near 6 ways because of this and fear for their own safety. My sister's car in Hart Road has been vandalised twice by rowdy youths. Rowdy behaviour in the pub opposite the Blue Lagoon Chip Shops. Owners choose to close early to avoid the conflict. Also at 6 ways take away - chip papers are thrown around. Erdington is a residential area and we should be able to have peace and quiet at night. Response 2: Evidence Antisocial behaviour on the high street. Response 3: Evidence We have enough shops that serve off licence drinks. In our area there is always a problem with those who drink too much, which then causes anti-social behaviour. Response 4: Evidence Alcohol related anti-social behaviour is well evidenced. Damage to vehicles from mindless behaviour multiple times. Drink and fast food litter in garden. Rowdy, noisy, late night disturbance.

Page 59 of 152

Response 5: Evidence There is too much anti-social behaviour in the area - current alcohol limitations are not working as there are groups of drinkers on the high street who regularly harass women, use Harrison Road as a toilet and discard rubbish and cans in the car park. People drink off-site, but cover the alcohol in paper bags or soft drink locations. They discard used cans in the car park and on pavements. As a woman, I feel very vulnerable walking through the high street and Harrison Road. I have had comments like 'sexy' and other derogatory terms. It is intimidating because there are groups of them. The police have been involved numerous times. At the Harrison Road and High Street junctions there are 5 premises which sell alcohol within 10 metres of each other. Too much! Response 6: Evidence none provided Response 7: Evidence I think the area should also include Spring Lane to encompass the shops there as the convenience store on Spring lane has made applications in the past to sell alcohol. Over the last few months, we have seen a rise in groups of people drinking in the alley between the Co-op and Dunvegan Road, also a huge increase in associated litter - cans (Beer/Cider), bottles (vodka etc.), crisp packets, takeaway containers in this area. Also two incidents of arson in this area. Response 8: Evidence none provided Response 9: Evidence I run a local business and I have noticed an increased amount of drunk people in the area, especially over the last year. Response 10: Evidence I have no statistical evidence - but as a resident of 14 years in Erdington I have seen more street drinking, passing through residential roads to and from these shops and off-licences. I see the increase of litter and broken discarded cans and bottles in the roads, vomit on the pavements. Noise and disturbance after 10pm in Johnson Road, Dean Road, Station Road etc. Every new shop it seems in B23 opens and sells foodstuff and alcohol.

Response 11: Evidence none provided Response 12: Evidence There are enough alcohol outlets. More needs to be done to address what happens after the sale of alcohol, i.e. crowds of drinkers, innocent people being threatened and intimidated. Response 13: Evidence We are inundated with these places in Erdington, they encourage trouble and litter and rowdiness - someone should take a look at how many we have! I also strongly believe the junction of Oliver Road and Somerset Road should be included. We see many incidents around Erdington of drunken people at any time of the day and night, it is very worrying to go out, stopping these outlets needs to be done immediately and make it safer for us.

Page 60 of 152

8 Response 14: Evidence Please see map: Amended to 'catch' the Cross Keys, the Swan and the Charlie Hall, all sources of 'spillout' problems on the High street, during the day. (Pubs are marked in Red on the map). On, or within a short stagger of the High Street there are five pubs: The Cross Keys, The HQ Bar a bit up the road from the library (an attempt to fuse continental cafe culture with the English Pub), The Swan, The Charlie Hall and the Acorn. The Swan and the Acorn regularly deposit their patrons outside on the street to chat, smoke, scuffle and make obnoxious/offensive remarks to passers-by. The clientele of the HQ Bar are mostly already outside, doing the last of those. Outside the pubs there is a lot of intimidating and offensive street behaviour. Any availability of alcohol risks producing that effect, but it seems worst at those spots.

Page 61 of 152

Response 15: Evidence To monitor the impact of future applications to open off licences/takeaways in the area and ensure they do not dominate the retail outlets in the area. We experience a high volume of litter from the late night refreshment outlets in our road and front garden. This is worst over the weekend. Response 16: Evidence I am writing to support my local conservative councillors in their campaign to introduce a CIP for Erdington High Street. Erdington has a terrible reputation for drink and drugs, and all the antisocial behaviour that unfortunately goes with it. The drunks are being continuously drip fed with both off licences and pubs on nearly every corner and surrounding area by the time I'm making my way home from work early evening, Erdington High Street is not a pleasant place to be or walk. The police appear to be continuously called, along with ambulances to deal with the fall out....This could be soo different, Erdington most mornings is a smashing place to shop, but from 11am onwards it is somewhere I avoid, and I head to other areas, Boldmere and Sutton - I'm not alone so this can only be detrimental to Erdington High Street and their employees in the long term Response 17: Evidence 1. I believe a cumulative impact policy for the area shown in the map of Erdington is necessary 2. The CIP should extend beyond on-sales to include off sales and late night refreshment. I believe it should because as a resident in Erdington for 14years i have seen in the roads that contain these premises and the roads with houses that surround them: more people, mainly men aged 15 - 50 drinking openly in the street. But young women also are drinking while on way to other places. Men walking along roads carrying cans and bottles., sitting or standing on corners etc.. Drinking. On the approach to Erdington Station and in Station Road, Gravelly Lane, Dean Road, Johnson Road I see this daily. The result is bottles and cans thrown in road, pavements in our properties gardens. Increase in litter in overflowing bins; vomit on street pavements and outside properties. Station Road Erdington and Gravelly Lane. antisocial behaviour at all times of the day - noise, loud drunken arguments, fights etc... Because people are drinking through the day and often smoking dope and cannabis as well as drinking. Loud parties and music from stereos through the early hours of morning - drinking and noise after hours on Erdington station platform in shelters (the station is not closed off by gates)more shops have opened or changed ownership and reopened selling alcohol in the 14years I have lived here. In Erdington High Street, Gravelly Lane, Station Road. Cheap alcohol fuels bad behaviour in some people - and I would rather see a curb on this by refusing licenses in future. Erdington needs regeneration like Boldmere and Wylde Green. We need more family shops, food shops selling healthy food produce fruit, veg, meat, fish etc.. This would contribute to a better healthier people and an area pleasant to live in. Restrict the availability of alcohol selling premises and you control drinking. Too many alcohol selling shops create price wars and cheaper alcohol opportunities for young people - we should be setting an example for children by restricting their exposure to an alcohol culture in Erdington. The council has a responsibility to its residents and the type of environment they live in. Street drinking and drug culture should not be encouraged by licencing shops and premises in areas where there are already too many opportunities to get alcohol.

Page 62 of 152

10 Response 18: Evidence I am for the CIP being set up in Erdington. There are enough Off-licences.

Response 19: Evidence I do believe a CIP is necessary for Erdington High Street and should also include parts of Station Road and Gravelly Lane Response 20: Evidence As BID Manager for the town centre area I am aware of continuing anti-social behaviour and alcohol abuse. The area does attract drinkers at all hours and there needs to be a safeguard that can be referred to. As mentioned above, the High Street area, particularly at night attracts drinkers and its share of ASB, particularly at the Six Ways end of the High Street, where there is a cluster of shops selling alcohol Response 21: Evidence The area already has a high proportion of off-licences plus supermarkets and public houses offering facilities to purchase takeaway alcohol. There is no further requirement and so a system of monitoring is required. Early morning dog walk in the area marked both in main shopping area and surround stretching as far as Grange Road recreation ground always see cans / littler/broken glass/broken bottles. Response 22: Evidence Erdington, especially near the High Street, has an abundance of pubs and off- licenses selling alcohol well into the early hours which is hazardous not only to their health but the health and wellbeing of people, like me and my family, who live in close proximity to 2 pubs (The Swan and HQ Bar on Orphanage Road). When the pubs close we have hordes of drunk revellers shouting abuse at one another, which wake up myself and my teenage daughter - it takes them quite a while to move on and in the meantime they urinate against walls and are, sometimes, sick in the street, and on rare occasions in my front garden. Erdington Ward Profile: http://birminghampublichealth.co.uk/manager/_mods/_ckfinder/userfiles/files/Erdingt on%20Ward%20Aug%202015.pdf clearly states: "Key Priority C for Erdington Ward: REDUCING ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION". Crime Statistics for my area which would be included in the CIZ: http://www.crime- statistics.co.uk/postcode/B24%209EH Response 23: Evidence - West Midlands Police To prevent the saturation of any further licensed premises within the defined area, thus limiting the availability of alcohol and the subsequent impact on crime and disorder. Police can evidence drink related crime and ASB in the defined mapped area. This has been contributed due to the numbers of on and off sales premises where alcohol is purchased. Response 24: Evidence - Environmental Health The area is an urban town centre, complete with associated problems this generates. It is felt that there are a large number of restaurants and take aways in the area already and when combined with existing pubs / bars this has given rise to the following issues: - Litter arising from patrons of licensed premises, increasingly predisposed to drop litter due to inebriation

Page 63 of 152

11 - Anti-social behaviour, including urination and defecation in public places, by persons who have frequented licensed premises (not directly dealt with by EH Officers but we are aware of the problems from discussions with partner agencies and residents / businesses in the area) Note: noise complaints arising are fewer in this area than may be expected, possibly due to a lesser number of residential in the immediate vicinity, but the main problems arise as a result of off-site activities and are considered to impact in the wider street scene and the services that manage this public realm, many of the issues falling under one or more of the licensable objectives.

It is the view of Environmental Health that the CIP should extend to “On and Off sales and Late Night Refreshment”. Given the points raised in answer to Q1, the problems are mixed and not easily attributed to a single ‘type’ of premises (as defined in the question). Response 25: Evidence - Public Health Please see Appendix 1(c) Response 26: Evidence - Local Ward Councillors Please see Appendix 1(d)

Page 64 of 152

12 APPENDIX 1(c)

RESPONSE FROM PUBLIC HEALTH

Question 1 Do you believe a Cumulative Impact Policy is necessary for the area shown in the map? Public Health response: Prepared by Kyle Stott – Birmingham Public Health Yes , Birmingham Public Health believes that a Cumulative Impact Policy is necessary for the area shown in the map on page 3 of the supporting document in the link above. Our reasons for this answer are as follows, based upon the Home Office CIP guidance of: “steps that should be followed in considering whether to adopt a CIP; these include: • identifying concern and considering whether there is good evidence that crime and disorder or nuisance are occurring, or whether there are activities which pose a threat to public safety or the protection of children from harm; Evidential basis: there must be an evidential basis for the decision to introduce a CIP, including: local crime and disorder statistics • statistics on local anti-social behaviour offences • health-related statistics such as alcohol-related emergency attendances and hospital admissions” 1 • 82.2% of the postcodes examined within the proposed CIP fall into LSOA that flag as red for tier 1 data within the Public Health alcohol tool. This score has been generated based on information regarding alcohol related violence and domestic violence, existing on-licences and off-licences, alcohol related fires, alcohol related safeguarding, and underage sales. These elements have been viewed as having the largest measurable impact on whether the licence should be granted and actual numbers were made available on a low level geography. • 80.7% of postcodes in the proposed CIP fall within LSOAs that are flagged as red for Police reported domestic violence. • 95.6% of postcodes (all but one Post Code) in the proposed CIP fall within MSOAs with a statistically higher than average concentration of premises that have a licence to serve alcohol for consumption on the premises, this is 82.2% for licences to serve alcohol off the premises. • Tackling alcohol and substance misuse has been adopted as a public health priority by Erdington district. • 95.6% of the postcodes in the proposed CIP fall within MSOAs that are flagged as red for alcohol related hospital admissions. • 95.6% of postcodes in the proposed CIP fall within MSOAs where referrals for commissioned services for alcohol and substance misuse are significantly statistically higher than average. • 71.1% of the postcodes within the proposed CIP fall within LSOAs that are flagged as red for alcohol related fire service call-outs • 82.2% of the postcodes within the proposed CIP fall within LSOAs that are flagged as red for underage sales justified complaints (all items). Based upon the results above at tier 1 level, it is unlikely that Public Health as a Responsible Authority would advise that an alcohol licence should be granted to an applicant. We are acutely aware that the alcohol and night-time economy in Birmingham contributes to local employment opportunities and local economic income, both having a positive impact upon public health outcomes. We believe that as opposed to being a policy to reduce economic opportunities, the policy could be used to assist in the allocation of licenses with conditions, and the exercising of special licensing powers to mitigate and ameliorate the impact of alcohol related harm against the 4 licensing objectives. The implementation of a CIP in this area could also contribute to the reduction of harmful and hazardous drinking and increase the wellbeing of citizens in this area. Alcohol related admissions, alcohol related liver disease and life expectancy are a concern.

Page 65 of 152

13 Question 2 Should the CIP extend beyond on -sales to include off sales / late night refreshment? On sales only? On and Off Sales only? On and Off sales and Late Night Refreshment? A different combination? (please state) Public Health response Public Health would like to see the CIP extend beyond on -sales to include off sales and late night refreshment. The reasons for this are as follows: Super-strength alcohol is often obtained via off-sales, and is strongly linked to pre-loading, (harmful and hazardous drinking), all forms of alcoholism, including street alcoholism/drinking. To put this into perspective, a 70cl bottle of spirits containing 28 units of alcohol typically costs between £ 10-13 while a 3 litre bottle of white cider containing 22.5 units of alcohol can be bought for £4 or £5.00. In short, very dangerous (and sometimes fatal) amounts of alcohol can be consumed for no more than £ 5.00 and is widely available in newsagents and supermarkets. For this reason, many people have advocated a minimum unit pricing of 50 pence per unit as based on this pricing, a 3 litre bottle of white cider would cost about £ 11.25 and not £4. Restricting the availability of such alcohol in outlets in Birmingham is an additional factor to consider when addressing the problem of harmful and hazardous drinking in the negative consequences that often follow, as highlighted in the statistics available at LSOA and MSOA level relating to alcohol in the proposed CIP for Erdington. Harm minimisation practices have shown to have a positive effect on many drinkers. Any policy aimed at the damage done by white cider for example, would also need to target other super-strength products including lager 2. Public policies affecting the price of alcoholic beverages have significant effects on alcohol-related disease and injury rates 3. A CIP and the special powers that this comes with can be used to halt the growth (and in some circumstances) reduce the cumulative impact of off-sales premises, and also be used to consider specific conditions should a licence be granted, for example restrictions on the sale of super-strength alcohol, and times when alcohol can be purchased. By combining the powers available to the many local government sectors involved in alcohol control, alcohol-related health and social harms can be tackled through existing local mechanisms 5. Local areas in England with more intense alcohol licensing policies had a stronger decline in rates of violent crimes, sexual crimes and public order offences in the period up to 2013 of the order of 4–6% greater compared with areas where these policies were not in place 6. During the period 2009–2015 greater reductions in alcohol-related admissions were observed in areas with more intense alcohol licensing policies, suggesting these policies really can help curb alcohol- related harm 7.

Supporting Information and References References: Document responding to: https://www.birminghambeheard.org.uk/place/licensing-act-2003- statement-of-licensing-policy-c-1/consult_view 1. BRIEFING PAPER Number 07269 , (23 July 2015) Alcohol: cumulative impact policies ; House of Commons Library

2. White Cider and street drinkers Recommendations to reduce harm (2011); Alcohol Concern.

3. Alexander C. Wagenaar, Amy L. Tobler, and Kelli A. Komro. Effects of Alcohol Tax and Price Policies on Morbidity and Mortality: A Systematic Review . American Journal of Public Health: November 2010, Vol. 100, No. 11, pp. 2270-2278

4. J Epidemiol Community Health 2016; 70 :231-237 doi:10.1136/jech-2015-206040; Alcohol, Measurable effects of local alcohol licensing policies on population health in England

5. J Public Health (2013) Responsibility without legal authority? Tackling alcohol-related health harms through licensing and planning policy in local government Page 66 of 152

14 6. J Epidemiol Community Health doi:10.1136/jech-2016-207753 (2016) Research report Testing the impact of local alcohol licencing policies on reported crime rates in England

7. Measurable effects of local alcohol licensing policies on population health in England. de Vocht F., Heron J., Angus C. et al. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health: 2016, 70(3), p. 231–237

Toolkit: Variable geographical levels of information have been used where available, in each case this is based on the post code of the application falling within this larger geographical area. Two terms are less commonly used outside of certain specialist areas and are detailed below: LSOA (Lower Super Output Area) is a geographical Census area with an approx. population of 1,500. MSOA (Medium Super Output Area) is a geographical Census area with a approx. population of 8,000. Scores have been calculated by comparing the geographical area in question to the average at a higher level (Birmingham in most instances). 10% margin of error has been applied to both the smaller and larger areas and it is only where these are still relatively different that a RED (more prevalence or risk in area compared to average) or GREEN (less prevalence or risk in area compared to average) score has been calculated. Where these margins for error overlap in any way this has been calculated as AMBER (indifference).

Page 67 of 152

15 APPENDIX 1(d)

Page 68 of 152

Page 69 of 152

Page 70 of 152

Page 71 of 152

Page 72 of 152

Page 73 of 152

21 Page 74 of 152

22 APPENDIX 2

EXTRACT FROM EMAIL RECEIVED 23 RD SEPTEMBER 2016 FROM THE HOME OFFICE

The first Lords Committee debate for the bill took place last week and the alcohol clauses are likely to be debated in mid-late October (date yet to be decided).

[]

Cumulative impact

Page 75 of 152

23 Guidance will make it clear that the cumulative impact assessment may be used when considering the variation of existing licences as well as the grant of new licences in the area. As is currently the case with CIPs, a cumulative impact assessment does not create an automatic refusal of a new licence or variation of an existing licence, and licensing authorities, other responsible authorities or other persons will need to make representations in the usual way.

The s.182 guidance will be updated and published when the legislation comes into force.

Page 76 of 152

24 Ward Tier Premises LSOA Tier Alcohol Related Existing On- Existing Off Cumulative Impact Underage Sales Underage Sales Underage Sales Any Alcohol Specific Liver Disease Alcohol Related Commissioned Two Police (Non-DV) Police (DV) Fire Services Safeguarding Counterfeit Activity District Priority Binge Drinking MH Adults Services District Ward Post Code One Score Ambulance Activity Licences Licences Areas Justified Complaints Alcohol Item Deaths Preventable Death Hospital Admissions Service Score Post Code Post Zone - Code LSOA - LSOA - LSOA - Post LSOA - Post LSOA - Post LSOA - Post LSOA - Post LSOA - Post LSOA - Post LSOA - Post Ward - Ward - LSOA - Post District - MSOA - MSOA - MSOA - MSOA - MSOA - District - Score (0- Zone - Score (0- LSOA - Score (0- LSOA - Score (0- Code - Score (0- Code - Score (0 Code - Score (0- Code - Score (0- Code - Score (0- Code - Score (0- Code - Score (0- Code - Score (0- Ward - Score (0- Ward - Score (0- Code - Score (0 District - Score (0- Indicator Score (0- Indicator Score (0- MSOA - Score (0- District - 2) Count 2) Count 2) Count 2) Count 2) Count or 2) Yes / No 2) Count 2) Count 2) Count 2) Count 2) Count 2) DSR 2) DSR 2) Count or 2) Yes / No 2) Value 2) Value 2) Rate 2) Rate B24 9HS RED AMBER 2 25 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B24 9HT RED AMBER 2 25 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B24 9HU AMBER AMBER 2 25 0 20 2 19 2 1 1 0 0 No 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 0 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B24 9HX AMBER AMBER 2 25 0 20 2 19 2 2 1 2 0 No 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 0 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B24 9JB AMBER AMBER 2 25 0 20 2 19 2 0 1 0 0 No 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 0 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B24 9JE AMBER AMBER 2 25 0 20 2 19 2 0 1 0 0 No 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 0 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B24 9NA RED AMBER 2 25 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B24 9WA RED AMBER 2 25 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B24 9WW RED AMBER 2 25 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B24 9XH RED AMBER 2 25 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B24 9ZN RED AMBER 2 25 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B24 8RF RED AMBER 2 25 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B24 8WJ RED AMBER 2 25 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B24 8WP RED AMBER 2 25 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B24 8WQ RED AMBER 2 25 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B24 8WR RED AMBER 2 25 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B24 8XA RED AMBER 2 25 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B24 9AA RED AMBER 2 25 0 36 1 13 2 1 2 0 0 No 1 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 19.4 2 151 2 0.175488 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B24 9AB RED AMBER 2 25 0 36 1 13 2 0 2 0 0 No 1 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 19.4 2 151 2 0.175488 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B24 9AD RED AMBER 2 25 0 36 1 13 2 0 2 0 0 No 1 0 1 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 19.4 2 151 2 0.175488 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B24 9AE RED AMBER 2 25 0 36 1 13 2 0 2 0 0 No 1 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 19.4 2 151 2 0.175488 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B24 9AG RED AMBER 2 25 0 36 1 13 2 0 2 0 0 No 1 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 19.4 2 151 2 0.175488 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B24 9AQ RED AMBER 2 25 0 36 1 13 2 0 2 0 0 No 1 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 19.4 2 151 2 0.175488 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B24 9AX RED AMBER 2 25 0 36 1 13 2 0 2 0 0 No 1 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 19.4 2 151 2 0.175488 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B24 9AY RED AMBER 2 25 0 36 1 13 2 0 2 0 0 No 1 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 19.4 2 151 2 0.175488 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B24 9AZ RED AMBER 2 25 0 36 1 13 2 0 2 0 0 No 1 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 19.4 2 151 2 0.175488 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B24 9BA RED AMBER 2 25 0 36 1 13 2 0 2 0 0 No 1 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 19.4 2 151 2 0.175488 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B24 9DE RED AMBER 2 25 0 36 1 13 2 0 2 0 0 No 1 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 19.4 2 151 2 0.175488 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B24 9DJ GREEN AMBER 2 25 0 1 1 4 0 0 1 0 0 No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 0 0 2 Yes 1 20.3 1 103 1 0.066956 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B24 9DL GREEN AMBER 2 25 0 1 1 4 0 0 1 0 0 No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 0 0 2 Yes 1 20.3 1 103 1 0.066956 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B24 9EH RED AMBER 2 25 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 1 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B24 9EJ RED AMBER 2 25 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B24 9EL RED AMBER 2 25 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B24 9EP RED AMBER 2 25 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B24 9ER AMBER AMBER 2 25 0 20 2 19 2 0 1 0 0 No 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 0 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B24 9ES AMBER AMBER 2 25 0 20 2 19 2 0 1 0 0 No 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 0 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B24 9ET AMBER AMBER 2 25 0 20 2 19 2 0 1 0 0 No 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 0 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B24 9EW AMBER AMBER 2 25 0 20 2 19 2 0 1 0 0 No 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 0 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B24 9HA AMBER AMBER 2 25 0 20 2 19 2 0 1 0 0 No 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 0 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B24 9HB AMBER AMBER 2 25 0 20 2 19 2 0 1 0 0 No 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 0 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B24 9HD AMBER AMBER 2 25 0 20 2 19 2 0 1 0 0 No 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 0 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B24 9HG GREEN AMBER 2 25 0 1 1 4 0 0 1 0 0 No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 0 0 2 Yes 1 20.3 1 103 1 0.066956 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B24 9HH GREEN AMBER 2 25 0 1 1 4 0 0 1 0 0 No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 0 0 2 Yes 1 20.3 1 103 1 0.066956 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B24 9HJ GREEN AMBER 2 25 0 1 1 4 0 0 1 0 0 No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 0 0 2 Yes 1 20.3 1 103 1 0.066956 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B24 9HP RED AMBER 2 25 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B24 9HQ GREEN AMBER 2 25 0 1 1 4 0 0 1 0 0 No 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 0 0 2 Yes 1 20.3 1 103 1 0.066956 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B24 9HR RED AMBER 2 25 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B24 0PN RED AMBER 2 25 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B24 0YQ RED AMBER 2 25 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B24 8AD RED AMBER 2 25 0 36 1 13 2 0 2 2 0 No 1 0 1 0 2 2 2 0 2 1 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 19.4 2 151 2 0.175488 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 6NZ RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 6PU AMBER AMBER 1 32 0 8 1 10 2 0 1 0 0 No 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 0 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 6PX RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 6PY RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 6QA RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 6QE AMBER AMBER 1 32 0 8 1 10 2 0 1 0 0 No 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 0 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 6QF AMBER AMBER 1 32 0 8 1 10 2 0 1 0 0 No 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 0 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 6QG RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 6QH AMBER AMBER 1 32 0 20 2 19 2 0 1 0 0 No 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 0 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 6QL AMBER AMBER 1 32 0 20 2 19 2 1 1 0 0 No 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 0 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 6QN RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 6QQ RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 6QR RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 6QS RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 6QT RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 6QU RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 1 2 1 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 6RE RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 6RG RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 1 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 6RH RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 1 2 1 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 6RN RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 6RP RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 6RS RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 1 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 6RT RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 6RY RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 1 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 6SA RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 1 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 6SB RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 Page 077 of 1520 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 6SD RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 6SH RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 1 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 6SJ RED AMBER 1 32 0 36 1 13 2 1 2 2 0 No 1 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 19.4 2 151 2 0.175488 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 6SN RED AMBER 1 32 0 36 1 13 2 2 2 3 0 No 1 0 1 1 2 3 2 0 2 1 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 2 2 Yes 1 19.4 2 151 2 0.175488 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 6SR RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 6SS RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 1 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 6SY RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 1 2 2 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 6SZ RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 6TD RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 2 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 6TE RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 1 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 1 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 6TG RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 6TH RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 6TJ RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 6TP RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 6TS RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 6TT RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 6TU RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 6TX RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 6TY RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 6UA RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 6UB RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 1 2 1 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 2 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 6UE RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 1 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 4 0 0 0 1 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 6UF RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 6UG RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 1 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 6UH RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 6UJ RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 6UL RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 1 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 6UT RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 1 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 6XB RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 6XT RED AMBER 1 32 0 36 1 13 2 0 2 0 0 No 1 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 19.4 2 151 2 0.175488 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 6BG RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 6DR RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 6DX RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 6LR AMBER AMBER 1 32 0 8 1 10 2 1 1 2 0 No 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 0 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 6LT AMBER AMBER 1 32 0 8 1 10 2 0 1 0 0 No 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 0 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 6LX RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 3AA RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 3AG RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 3DF RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 3DS RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 3FD RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 3FH RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 3FJ RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 3FL RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 3FN RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 3FP RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 3FQ RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 3FR RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 3FS RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 3FT RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 3FU RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 3FW RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 3FX RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 3FY RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 3GN RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 3GS RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 3HA RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 3HB RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington B23 3HD RED AMBER 1 32 0 121 2 26 2 0 2 0 0 No 2 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 13.08699 1 20.25289 2 0 2 Yes 1 29.5 2 135.4 2 0.140467 2 0.004766 Erdington Erdington

Page 78 of 152 BIRMINGHAM CITY COUNCIL

REPORT OF THE ACTING DIRECTOR OF REGULATION AND ENFORCEMENT TO THE LICENSING AND PUBLIC PROTECTION COMMITTEE

19 OCTOBER 2016 NECHELLS

STATEMENT OF LICENSING POLICY – CUMULATIVE IMPACT AREAS POST CONSULTATION REPORT – DIGBETH AREA

1. Summary

1.2 In order to take effect any amended policy must be approved by City Council.

1.3 This is a requirement of the Licensing Act 2003 (‘The Act’).

1.4 The Statement of Licensing Policy includes areas of Special Policy known as Cumulative Impact Policy Areas or (CIPs).

1.5 The purpose of this report is to apprise Members of the results of consultation on the proposal to implement three further CIP areas.

2. Recommendations

2.1 That the Committee consider the responses to the consultation for the Digbeth Area proposed for CIP.

2.2 That Members consider whether there is sufficient evidence to implement CIP area as proposed.

2.3 That, should Members agree to the proposals in 2.2, Members consider if the CIP should relate to: (i) On sales; (ii) On and Off Sales, or (iii) On and Off Sales and Late Night Refreshment

2.4 That any proposals agreed to at 2.2 and 2.3 be reflected in a revised Statement of Licensing Policy, to be presented to City Council at the next available opportunity.

Contact Officer: Emma Rohomon, Licensing Manager Telephone: 0121 303 9780 Email: [email protected]

Page 79 of 152

1 3. Background

3.1 The principle of ‘Cumulative Impact’ does not originate from the Licensing Act itself, but from the Statutory Guidance issued by the Home Office as required by s182 of the Act.

3.2 Cumulative Impact is addressed in paragraphs 13.2-13.41of the Revised Guidance ( Issued March 2015). The full guidance document can be found at: http://bit.ly/s182Mar2015

3.8 Following these preliminary enquiries it was agreed to proceed with more extensive consultation in relation to the areas of John Bright Street, Digbeth and Erdington. Page 80 of 152

2 4. Consultation

4.1 A summary of responses to the consultation for the Digbeth Area is attached at Appendix 1(a) to this report, with comments attached at Appendix 1(b)-(c)

4.3 Owing to the low number of responses, the consultation was extended by a further 2 weeks with email sent reminders where possible.

5. Results of Consultation

5.1 All of the responses received (6) were in favour of the proposed CIP.

5.2 Of the responses which expressed a preference, 3 were in favour of On, Off and Late Night Refreshment Sales being included one supported On and Off sales only, with two responses not indicating a preference.

5.3 The Police, Environmental Health and Public Health are all supportive of the proposed CIP.

6. Matters for Consideration

6.1 There were disappointingly low response rates to these consultations, despite the consultation period being extended.

6.2 Members are reminded of the considerations detailed in paragraph 3.3 above when considering whether there is sufficient evidence provided to justify the implementation of these CIP areas.

6.5 A further report will be brought to your Committee outlining all of the implications of the Policing and Crime Bill following Royal Assent.

Page 81 of 152

3 7. Implications for Resources

7.1 The cost of devising and maintaining a Statement of Licensing Policy, including revisions and amendments, is included within the existing Licence fee structure.

8. Implications for Policy Priorities

9. Public Sector Equality Duty

9.2 There are no likely adverse consequences on any person who falls within the definition of a protected characteristic.

ACTING DIRECTOR OF REGULATION AND ENFORCEMENT

Background Papers: Nil

Page 82 of 152

4 APPENDIX 1(a)

DIGBETH CONSULTATION RESPONSES (SUMMARY)

If so, what Should the CIP extend Please provide Do you believe a CIP are your beyond on sales to any evidence to is necessary for the reasons for include off sales/late support your proposed area? this? night refreshment? answer

1 Yes None Given On and Off Sales Only None Provided On and Off Sales and 2 Yes None Given Late Night Refreshment None Provided 3 Yes See Below Not stated See Below On and Off Sales and 4 Yes See Below Late Night Refreshment See Below On and Off Sales and 5 Yes See Below Late Night Refreshment See Below 6 Yes See Below Not stated See Below

Page 83 of 152

5 APPENDIX 1(b)

DIGBETH CONSULTATION RESPONSES

Response 3: Evidence Southside supports the inclusion of cumulative impact areas for Digbeth and John Bright Street. Since Southside was granted its cumulative impact area, we have seen businesses setting up outside the usual NTE areas which now have these policies, causing issues with ASB and night time policing. We urge you to implement these areas for the comfort of the local residents and to ensure the efficacy of city centre policing in the night time economy.

Response 4: Evidence (West Midlands Police) Yes we believe a Cumulative Impact Policy is necessary. In recent years we have seen a substantial growth in Shisha lounges and night club venues across the Digbeth and Highate areas. This has generated increased incidents of inconsiderate parking / noise complaints / ASB / drug issues, violent crime / Child sex exploitation and demand on limited police resources.

Yes we believe it should include all applications including off and on sales, and late night refreshment.

This would be important for our ever growing student community which at present stands at approximately 12000, with a high transient population through the area. These areas would be prime location for future late night refreshment and in particular off sales applications / sites. With the continuing growth in Shisha Lounges numbers, consideration needs to be given to venues offering extra services such as entertainment and refreshment, to gain an advantage over other such establishments.

Evidence: Big Break Snooker Club closed by West Midlands Police under closure order following concerns of ASB and child sex exploitation. Evidence of drugs / alcohol / condoms found at premises. Operating with late night refreshment licence.

Drug related death at Rainbow Warehouse New Year’s day 2016.

Shooting outside Arabian nights Shisha Lounge 11 th July 2016. Also subject to intelligence reports of vulnerable underage females being taken there.

Two Shisha lounges burnt down following arson attacks.

Numerous and continual parking and noise complaints across a number of venues operating with licences.

A more detailed analytic product can be provided if required.

Page 84 of 152

Response 5: Evidence (Environmental Health) There has been a historic proliferation of late night entertainment venues within the area e.g. clubs, bars, etc., and Environmental Health have had to respond to complaints of noise form on and off premises arising from the same. The area around / between High Street and the railway line saw the greatest concentration and when investigating complaints it was often difficult to break apart the impact from each club – individually a club may not have been a nuisance (public or statutory) but combined they were clearly a problem. Unfortunately we have been unable to assist residents in these circumstances. Such a policy would ensure that no future venue contributes to the environment of the area in this way and upsets the balance that appears to have been established.

There has also been an increase in residential into the area and whilst large parts of the area remain subject to a lack of clear investment, it will only be a matter of time before the growth from other city areas extends into Digbeth / Deritend in full and if this follows the wider planning policy for the city centre, which encourages a mixed use of areas with a preferred co-existence of residential and other uses, including the night time economy, then having a robust Licensing policy in place to support this would be advantageous to existing uses e.g. it would provide a measure of safeguarding against excessive competition, and be beneficial to existing and new residents, by providing an environment that is conducive to the mixed uses.

It is the view of Environmental Health that the CIP should extend to “On and Off sales and Late Night Refreshment”. Given the points raised in answer to Q1, it would be a policy gap to afford controls to on-sales only and not provide similar controls to venues which have a clear linkage to those providing on-sales e.g. as the patrons will seek refreshment (food or drink) before or after the entertainment and this means more people in the area into the early hours and in a position to cause a breach of the licensing objectives. By restricting the number of such premises or affording better controls, the risk of such a breach is reduced.

Response 6: Evidence ( Public Health) See Appendix 1(c)

Page 85 of 152

7 APPENDIX 1(c)

Public Health – Consultation Response

Question 1 Do you believe a Cumulative Impact Policy is necessary for the area shown in the map? Public Health response: Prepared by Kyle Stott – Birmingham Public Health Yes , Birmingham Public Hea lth believes that a Cumulative Impact Policy is necessary for the area shown in the map on page 3 of the supporting document in the link above. Our reasons for this answer are as follows, based upon the Home Office CIP guidance of: “steps that should be followed in considering whether to adopt a CIP; these include: • identifying concern and considering whether there is good evidence that crime and disorder or nuisance are occurring, or whether there are activities which pose a threat to public safety or the protection of children from harm; Evidential basis: there must be an evidential basis for the decision to introduce a CIP, including: local crime and disorder statistics • statistics on local anti-social behaviour offences • health-related statistics such as alcohol-related emergency attendances and hospital admissions” 1 • 94.8% of the postcodes examined within the proposed CIP fall into LSOA that flag as red for tier 1 data within the Public Health alcohol tool. This score has been generated based on information regarding alcohol related violence and domestic violence, existing on-licences and off-licences, alcohol related fires, alcohol related safeguarding, and underage sales. These elements have been viewed as having the largest measurable impact on whether the licence should be granted and actual numbers were made available on a low level geography. • 72.2% of postcodes in the proposed CIP fall within LSOAs that are flagged as red for Police reported domestic violence. • 99.7% of postcodes (all but one Post Code) in the proposed CIP fall within MSOAs with a statistically higher than average concentration of premises that have a licence to serve alcohol for consumption on the premises, this is 36.4% for licences to serve alcohol off the premises. • Tackling alcohol and substance misuse has been adopted as a public health priority by Ladywood district. • 85.3% of the postcodes in the proposed CIP fall within MSOAs that are flagged as red for alcohol related hospital admissions. • 85.6% of postcodes in the proposed CIP fall within MSOAs where referrals for commissioned services for alcohol and substance misuse are significantly statistically higher than average. • Local licensing policies appear to be associated with a reduction in alcohol-related hospital admissions in areas with more intense licensing policies 4.

Based upon the results above at tier 1 level, it is unlikely that Public Health as a Responsible Authority would advise that an alcohol licence should be granted to an applicant. We are acutely aware that the alcohol and night-time economy in Birmingham contributes to local employment opportunities and local economic income, both having a positive impact upon public health outcomes. We believe that as opposed to being a policy to reduce economic opportunities could assist in the allocation of licenses with conditions, and the exercising of special licensing powers to mitigate and ameliorate the impact of alcohol related harm against the 4 licensing objectives. This implementation of a CIP in this area could also contribute to the reduction of harmful and hazardous drinking and increase the wellbeing of citizens of Birmingham, and an increase in the safety of citizens and visitors to the city

Page 86 of 152

Question 2 Should the CIP extend beyond on -sales to include off sale s / late night refreshment? On sales only? On and Off Sales only? On and Off sales and Late Night Refreshment? A different combination? (please state) Public Health response Public Health would like to see the CIP extend beyond on -sales to include off sales and late night refreshment. The reasons for this are as follows: Super-strength alcohol is often obtained via off-sales, and is strongly linked to pre-loading, (harmful and hazardous drinking), all forms of alcoholism, including street alcoholism/drinking. To put this into perspective, a 70cl bottle of spirits containing 28 units of alcohol typically costs between £ 10-13 while a 3 litre bottle of white cider containing 22.5 units of alcohol can be bought for £4 or £5.00. In short, very dangerous (and sometimes fatal) amounts of alcohol can be consumed for no more than £ 5.00 and is widely available in newsagents and supermarkets. For this reason, many people have advocated a minimum unit pricing of 50 pence per unit as based on this pricing, a 3 litre bottle of white cider would cost about £ 11.25 and not £4. Restricting the availability of such alcohol in outlets in Birmingham is an additional factor to consider when addressing the problem of harmful and hazardous drinking in the negative consequences that often follow, as highlighted in the statistics available at LSOA and MSOA level relating to alcohol in the proposed CIP for Digbeth. Harm minimisation practices have shown to have a positive effect on many drinkers. Any policy aimed at the damage done by white cider for example, would also need to target other super-strength products including lager 2. Public policies affecting the price of alcoholic beverages have significant effects on alcohol-related disease and injury rates 3. A CIP and the special powers that this comes with can be used to halt the growth (and in some circumstances) reduce the cumulative impact of off-sales premises, and also be used to consider specific conditions should a licence be granted, for example restrictions on the sale of super-strength alcohol, and times when alcohol can be purchased. By combining the powers available to the many local government sectors involved in alcohol control, alcohol-related health and social harms can be tackled through existing local mechanisms5. Local areas in England with more intense alcohol licensing policies had a stronger decline in rates of violent crimes, sexual crimes and public order offences in the period up to 2013 of the order of 4–6% greater compared with areas where these policies were not in place 6. During the period 2009–2015 greater reductions in alcohol-related admissions were observed in areas with more intense alcohol licensing policies, suggesting these policies really can help curb alcohol- related harm 7. Supporting Information and References References: Document responding to: https://www.birminghambeheard.org.uk/place/licensing-act-2003-statement-of-licensing- policy-c/supporting_documents/Digbeth%20CIP.pdf 1. BRIEFING PAPER Number 07269 , (23 July 2015) Alcohol: cumulative impact policies ; House of Commons Library

2. White Cider and street drinkers Recommendations to reduce harm (2011); Alcohol Concern.

4. J Epidemiol Community Health 2016; 70 :231-237 doi:10.1136/jech-2015-206040; Alcohol, Measurable effects of local alcohol licensing policies on population health in England

5. J Public Health (2013) Responsibility without legal authority? Tackling alcohol-related health harms through licensing and planning policy in local government Page 87 of 152

9 6. J Epidemiol Community Health doi:10.1136/jech-2016-207753 (2016) Research report Testing the impact of local alcohol licencing policies on reported crime rates in England

Page 88 of 152

10 APPENDIX 2

EXTRACT FROM EMAIL RECEIVED 23 RD SEPTEMBER 2016 FROM THE HOME OFFICE

The first Lords Committee debate for the bill took place last week and the alcohol clauses are likely to be debated in mid-late October (date yet to be decided).

[]

Cumulative impact

Page 89 of 152

11 Guidance will make it clear that the cumulative impact assessment may be used when considering the variation of existing licences as well as the grant of new licences in the area. As is currently the case with CIPs, a cumulative impact assessment does not create an automatic refusal of a new licence or variation of an existing licence, and licensing authorities, other responsible authorities or other persons will need to make representations in the usual way.

The s.182 guidance will be updated and published when the legislation comes into force.

Page 90 of 152

12 Ward Tier Premises LSOA Tier Alcohol Related Existing On- Existing Off Cumulative Impact Two Police (Non-DV) Police (DV) Post Code One Score Ambulance Activity Licences Licences Areas Score Post Code Post Zone - Code LSOA - LSOA - LSOA - Post LSOA - Post LSOA - Post Score (0- Zone - Score (0- LSOA - Score (0- LSOA - Score (0- Code - Score (0- Code - Score (0 Code - 2) Count 2) Count 2) Count 2) Count 2) Count or 2) Yes / No B12 0XX RED AMBER 1 15 0 9 2 12 2 0 1 0 0 No B12 0XY RED AMBER 1 15 0 9 2 12 2 0 1 0 0 No B12 0XZ RED AMBER 1 15 0 9 2 12 2 0 1 0 0 No B12 0YA RED AMBER 1 15 0 9 2 12 2 0 1 0 0 No B12 0YB RED AMBER 1 15 0 9 2 12 2 0 1 0 0 No B12 0YD RED AMBER 1 15 0 9 2 12 2 0 1 0 0 No B12 0YE RED AMBER 1 15 0 9 2 12 2 0 1 0 0 No B12 0YH RED AMBER 1 15 0 9 2 12 2 0 1 0 0 No B12 0YJ RED AMBER 1 15 0 9 2 12 2 0 1 0 0 No B12 0YL RED AMBER 1 15 0 9 2 12 2 0 1 0 0 No B12 0YN RED AMBER 1 15 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 0 0 No B12 0YQ RED AMBER 1 15 0 9 2 12 2 0 1 0 0 No B12 0YR RED AMBER 1 15 0 9 2 12 2 0 1 0 0 No B12 0YT RED AMBER 1 15 0 9 2 12 2 0 1 0 0 No B12 0YU RED AMBER 1 15 0 14 2 13 2 0 0 0 0 No B12 0YY RED AMBER 1 15 0 14 2 13 2 0 0 0 0 No B12 0YZ RED AMBER 1 15 0 14 2 13 2 0 0 0 0 No B12 0AB RED AMBER 1 15 0 14 2 13 2 0 0 0 0 No B12 0EJ RED AMBER 1 15 0 14 2 13 2 0 0 0 0 No B12 0EL RED AMBER 1 15 0 14 2 13 2 0 0 0 0 No B12 0EN RED AMBER 1 15 0 14 2 13 2 0 0 0 0 No B12 0ER RED AMBER 1 15 0 14 2 13 2 0 0 0 0 No B12 0EU RED AMBER 1 15 0 14 2 13 2 0 0 0 0 No B12 0HB RED AMBER 1 15 0 124 2 21 2 1 2 0 0 No B12 0HD RED AMBER 1 15 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 0 0 No B12 0HE RED AMBER 1 15 0 14 2 13 2 0 0 0 0 No B12 0HF RED AMBER 1 15 0 14 2 13 2 0 0 0 0 No B12 0HG RED AMBER 1 15 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 0 0 No B12 0HJ RED AMBER 1 15 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 0 0 No B12 0HL RED AMBER 1 15 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 0 0 No B12 0HP RED AMBER 1 15 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 0 0 No B12 0HT RED AMBER 1 15 0 14 2 13 2 0 0 0 0 No B12 0JB RED AMBER 1 15 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 0 0 No B12 0JD RED AMBER 1 15 0 124Page 91 2of 152 21 2 1 2 0 0 No B12 0JG RED AMBER 1 15 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 0 0 No B12 0JJ RED AMBER 1 15 0 14 2 13 2 0 0 0 0 No B12 0JP AMBER AMBER 1 15 0 20 1 6 2 0 1 0 0 No B12 0JU RED AMBER 1 15 0 148 2 15 2 0 1 0 0 No B12 0LD RED AMBER 1 15 0 148 2 15 2 2 1 1 0 No B12 0LH RED AMBER 1 15 0 148 2 15 2 0 1 0 0 No B12 0LL RED AMBER 1 15 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 0 0 No B12 0LN RED AMBER 1 15 0 124 2 21 2 1 2 0 0 No B12 0NB RED AMBER 1 15 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 0 0 No B12 0ND RED AMBER 1 15 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 0 0 No B12 0NE RED AMBER 1 15 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 0 0 No B12 0NF RED AMBER 1 15 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 0 0 No B12 0NG RED AMBER 1 15 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 0 0 No B12 0NH RED AMBER 1 15 0 124 2 21 2 1 2 0 0 No B12 0NJ RED AMBER 1 15 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 0 0 No B12 0NL RED AMBER 1 15 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 0 0 No B12 0NP RED AMBER 1 15 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 0 0 No B12 0NQ RED AMBER 1 15 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 0 0 No B12 0NS RED AMBER 1 15 0 124 2 21 2 1 2 0 0 No B12 0NW RED AMBER 1 15 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 0 0 No B12 0NX RED AMBER 1 15 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 0 0 No B12 0NY RED AMBER 1 15 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 0 0 No B12 0NZ RED AMBER 1 15 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 0 0 No B12 0PA RED AMBER 1 15 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 0 0 No B12 0PB RED AMBER 1 15 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 0 0 No B12 0PG RED AMBER 1 15 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 0 0 No B12 0PH RED AMBER 1 15 0 124 2 21 2 1 2 0 0 No B12 0PJ RED AMBER 1 15 0 124 2 21 2 1 2 0 0 No B12 0PN RED AMBER 1 15 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 0 0 No B12 0PP RED AMBER 1 15 0 9 2 12 2 0 1 0 0 No B12 0PR RED AMBER 1 15 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 0 0 No B12 0PS RED AMBER 1 15 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 0 0 No B12 0PU RED AMBER 1 15 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 1 0 No B12 0PW RED AMBER 1 15 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 0 0 No B12 0PX RED AMBER 1 15 0 9 2 12 2 0 1 0 0 No B12 0PY RED AMBER 1 15 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 0 0 No B12 0QB RED AMBER 1 15 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 0 0 No B12 0QE RED AMBER 1 15 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 0 0 No B12 0QH RED AMBER 1 15 0 124 2 21 2 1 2 0 0 No B12 0QN RED AMBER 1 15 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 0 0 No B12 0QR RED AMBER 1 15 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 0 0 No B12 0QX RED AMBER 1 15 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 0 0 No B12 0QY RED AMBER 1 15 0 124 2 21 2 1 2 0 0 No B12 0RG RED AMBER 1 15 0 124 2 21 2 2 2 0 0 No B12 0RL RED AMBER 1 15 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 0 0 No B12 0RP RED AMBER 1 15 0 124Page 92 2of 152 21 2 0 2 1 0 No B12 0RR RED AMBER 1 15 0 14 2 13 2 0 0 0 0 No B12 0RT RED AMBER 1 15 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 1 0 No B12 0RY RED AMBER 1 15 0 124 2 21 2 1 2 0 0 No B12 0SD RED AMBER 1 15 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 0 0 No B12 0SH RED AMBER 1 15 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 0 0 No B12 0SJ RED AMBER 1 15 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 0 0 No B12 0SL RED AMBER 1 15 0 14 2 13 2 0 0 0 0 No B12 0SQ RED AMBER 1 15 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 0 0 No B12 0SS RED AMBER 1 15 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 1 0 No B12 0ST RED AMBER 1 15 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 0 0 No B12 0SU RED AMBER 1 15 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 0 0 No B12 0TA RED AMBER 1 15 0 14 2 13 2 0 0 0 0 No B12 0TL RED AMBER 1 15 0 14 2 13 2 0 0 0 0 No B12 0TN RED AMBER 1 15 0 14 2 13 2 0 0 0 0 No B12 0TP RED AMBER 1 15 0 14 2 13 2 0 0 0 0 No B12 0TR RED AMBER 1 15 0 14 2 13 2 0 0 0 0 No B12 0TS RED AMBER 1 15 0 14 2 13 2 0 0 0 0 No B12 0TT RED AMBER 1 15 0 14 2 13 2 0 0 0 0 No B12 0TU RED AMBER 1 15 0 14 2 13 2 0 0 0 0 No B12 0TX RED AMBER 1 15 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 0 0 No B12 0TY RED AMBER 1 15 0 14 2 13 2 1 0 0 0 No B12 0UA RED AMBER 1 15 0 14 2 13 2 0 0 0 0 No B12 0UD RED AMBER 1 15 0 14 2 13 2 0 0 0 0 No B12 0UF RED AMBER 1 15 0 9 2 12 2 0 1 0 0 No B12 0UJ RED AMBER 1 15 0 14 2 13 2 0 0 0 0 No B12 0UL RED AMBER 1 15 0 14 2 13 2 0 0 0 0 No B12 0UP RED AMBER 1 15 0 14 2 13 2 0 0 0 0 No B12 0UR RED AMBER 1 15 0 14 2 13 2 0 0 0 0 No B12 0UU RED AMBER 1 15 0 9 2 12 2 0 1 0 0 No B12 0UX RED AMBER 1 15 0 9 2 12 2 0 1 0 0 No B12 0UZ RED AMBER 1 15 0 14 2 13 2 0 0 0 0 No B12 0XB RED AMBER 1 15 0 9 2 12 2 0 1 0 0 No B12 0XE RED AMBER 1 15 0 14 2 13 2 0 0 0 0 No B12 0XF RED AMBER 1 15 0 14 2 13 2 0 0 0 0 No B12 0XG RED AMBER 1 15 0 14 2 13 2 0 0 0 0 No B12 0XJ RED AMBER 1 15 0 14 2 13 2 0 0 0 0 No B12 0XN RED AMBER 1 15 0 14 2 13 2 0 0 0 0 No B12 0XP RED AMBER 1 15 0 9 2 12 2 0 1 0 0 No B12 0XR RED AMBER 1 15 0 9 2 12 2 0 1 1 0 No B12 0XS RED AMBER 1 15 0 9 2 12 2 0 1 0 0 No B12 0XT RED AMBER 1 15 0 9 2 12 2 0 1 0 0 No B12 0XU RED AMBER 1 15 0 9 2 12 2 0 1 0 0 No B11 1AX RED AMBER 1 29 0 14 2 13 2 0 0 0 0 No B10 0RU RED AMBER 1 7 0 14Page 93 2of 152 13 2 0 0 0 0 No B10 0RX RED AMBER 1 7 0 148 2 15 2 0 1 0 0 No B10 0SA RED AMBER 1 7 0 148 2 15 2 0 1 0 0 No B9 4AA RED AMBER 1 9 0 148 2 15 2 5 1 1 0 No B9 4AE RED AMBER 1 9 0 148 2 15 2 2 1 0 0 No B9 4AG RED AMBER 1 9 0 148 2 15 2 3 1 0 0 No B9 4AH RED AMBER 1 9 0 148 2 15 2 1 1 0 0 No B9 4AL RED AMBER 1 9 0 148 2 15 2 2 1 0 0 No B9 4AN RED AMBER 1 9 0 148 2 15 2 0 1 0 0 No B9 4AR RED AMBER 1 9 0 148 2 15 2 1 1 0 0 No B9 4AX RED AMBER 1 9 0 148 2 15 2 0 1 0 0 No B9 4AY RED AMBER 1 9 0 148 2 15 2 1 1 0 0 No B9 4BA RED AMBER 1 9 0 98 1 9 2 0 1 0 0 No B9 4BB RED AMBER 1 9 0 148 2 15 2 0 1 0 0 No B9 4DR RED AMBER 1 9 0 148 2 15 2 0 1 0 0 No B9 4DS RED AMBER 1 9 0 148 2 15 2 0 1 0 0 No B9 4DY RED AMBER 1 9 0 148 2 15 2 0 1 0 0 No B9 4ED RED AMBER 1 9 0 148 2 15 2 1 1 0 0 No B9 4EE RED AMBER 1 9 0 148 2 15 2 2 1 0 0 No B9 4EG RED AMBER 1 9 0 148 2 15 2 1 1 0 0 No B9 4EH RED AMBER 1 9 0 148 2 15 2 0 1 0 0 No B9 4EJ RED AMBER 1 9 0 148 2 15 2 0 1 0 0 No B9 4EL RED AMBER 1 9 0 148 2 15 2 0 1 0 0 No B9 4EN RED AMBER 1 9 0 148 2 15 2 0 1 0 0 No B9 4EP RED AMBER 1 9 0 148 2 15 2 0 1 0 0 No B9 4ER RED AMBER 1 9 0 148 2 15 2 0 1 0 0 No B9 4EY RED AMBER 1 9 0 148 2 15 2 0 1 0 0 No B9 4HN RED AMBER 1 9 0 148 2 15 2 0 1 0 0 No B7 4AJ RED AMBER 1 3 0 98 1 9 2 0 1 0 0 No B7 4AP RED AMBER 1 3 0 98 1 9 2 0 1 0 0 No B7 4AS RED AMBER 1 3 0 98 1 9 2 0 1 0 0 No B7 4AT RED AMBER 1 3 0 98 1 9 2 0 1 0 0 No B7 4AX RED AMBER 1 3 0 98 1 9 2 0 1 0 0 No B7 4AZ RED AMBER 1 3 0 98 1 9 2 0 1 0 0 No B7 4BB RED AMBER 1 3 0 98 1 9 2 1 1 0 0 No B7 4BG RED AMBER 1 3 0 98 1 9 2 1 1 0 0 No B7 4BN RED AMBER 1 3 0 98 1 9 2 0 1 0 0 No B7 4BZ RED AMBER 1 3 0 98 1 9 2 0 1 0 0 No B7 4EH AMBER AMBER 1 3 0 139 1 10 2 0 2 0 0 No B7 4EJ RED AMBER 1 3 0 98 1 9 2 0 1 0 0 No B5 6TN RED AMBER 1 10 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 0 0 No B5 7AP RED AMBER 1 10 0 123 2 27 2 0 1 1 2 No B5 7AS RED AMBER 1 10 0 123 2 27 2 0 1 0 2 No B5 7AX YELLOW YELLOW 1 10 0 12 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 No Page 94 of 152 B5 7AY RED AMBER 1 10 0 123 2 27 2 0 1 0 2 No B5 7AZ RED AMBER 1 10 0 123 2 27 2 0 1 0 2 No B5 7BT RED AMBER 1 10 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 0 0 No B5 7BU RED AMBER 1 10 0 9 2 12 2 0 1 0 0 No B5 7BX RED AMBER 1 10 0 9 2 12 2 0 1 0 0 No B5 7DA RED AMBER 1 10 0 9 2 12 2 0 1 0 0 No B5 7DE RED AMBER 1 10 0 123 2 27 2 0 1 0 2 No B5 7DF RED AMBER 1 10 0 123 2 27 2 0 1 0 2 No B5 7DG RED AMBER 1 10 0 123 2 27 2 0 1 0 2 No B5 7DH RED AMBER 1 10 0 123 2 27 2 0 1 0 2 No B5 7DJ RED AMBER 1 10 0 123 2 27 2 0 1 0 2 No B5 7DL RED AMBER 1 10 0 123 2 27 2 0 1 0 2 No B5 7DP RED AMBER 1 10 0 9 2 12 2 0 1 0 0 No B5 7DQ RED AMBER 1 10 0 123 2 27 2 0 1 0 2 No B5 7DR RED AMBER 1 10 0 9 2 12 2 0 1 0 0 No B5 7DU RED AMBER 1 10 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 0 0 No B5 7DZ RED AMBER 1 10 0 123 2 27 2 0 1 0 2 No B5 7EH RED AMBER 1 10 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 0 0 No B5 7EJ RED AMBER 1 10 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 0 0 No B5 7EP RED AMBER 1 10 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 0 0 No B5 7HE RED AMBER 1 10 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 0 0 No B5 7HF RED AMBER 1 10 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 0 0 No B5 7HP RED AMBER 1 10 0 124 2 21 2 1 2 0 0 No B5 7HQ RED AMBER 1 10 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 0 0 No B5 7HR RED AMBER 1 10 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 0 0 No B5 7HT RED AMBER 1 10 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 0 0 No B5 7HY RED AMBER 1 10 0 9 2 12 2 1 1 0 0 No B5 7JE RED AMBER 1 10 0 9 2 12 2 0 1 0 0 No B5 7JG RED AMBER 1 10 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 0 0 No B5 7JH RED AMBER 1 10 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 0 0 No B5 7JJ RED AMBER 1 10 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 0 0 No B6 4BS RED AMBER 1 16 0 98 1 9 2 0 1 0 0 No B5 7JL RED AMBER 1 10 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 0 0 No B5 7JN RED AMBER 1 10 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 0 0 No B5 7JP RED AMBER 1 10 0 9 2 12 2 0 1 0 0 No B5 7JQ RED AMBER 1 10 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 0 0 No B5 7LD RED AMBER 1 10 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 0 0 No B5 5BD RED AMBER 1 10 2 963 2 68 2 0 2 0 2 No B5 5BL RED AMBER 1 10 0 98 1 9 2 0 1 0 0 No B5 5JE AMBER AMBER 1 10 0 139 1 10 2 0 2 1 0 No B5 5JF AMBER AMBER 1 10 0 139 1 10 2 0 2 0 0 No B5 5JG RED AMBER 1 10 0 98 1 9 2 0 1 0 0 No B5 5JH RED AMBER 1 10 0 98 1 9 2 0 1 0 0 No Page 95 of 152 B5 5JL AMBER AMBER 1 10 0 139 1 10 2 0 2 0 0 No B5 5JN AMBER AMBER 1 10 0 139 1 10 2 0 2 0 0 No B5 5JR AMBER AMBER 1 10 0 139 1 10 2 1 2 0 0 No B5 5JU AMBER AMBER 1 10 0 139 1 10 2 0 2 1 0 No B5 5LG RED AMBER 1 10 0 98 1 9 2 1 1 0 0 No B5 5LR RED AMBER 1 10 0 98 1 9 2 0 1 0 0 No B5 5LS RED AMBER 1 10 0 98 1 9 2 0 1 0 0 No B5 5LY RED AMBER 1 10 0 98 1 9 2 0 1 0 0 No B5 5NF RED AMBER 1 10 0 148 2 15 2 0 1 0 0 No B5 5NH RED AMBER 1 10 0 148 2 15 2 0 1 0 0 No B5 5NL RED AMBER 1 10 0 148 2 15 2 0 1 0 0 No B5 5NQ RED AMBER 1 10 0 148 2 15 2 0 1 0 0 No B5 5NR RED AMBER 1 10 0 148 2 15 2 3 1 0 0 No B5 5NY RED AMBER 1 10 0 98 1 9 2 0 1 0 0 No B5 5PG RED AMBER 1 10 0 98 1 9 2 0 1 0 0 No B5 5PH RED AMBER 1 10 0 98 1 9 2 1 1 0 0 No B5 5PJ RED AMBER 1 10 0 98 1 9 2 1 1 0 0 No B5 5PL RED AMBER 1 10 0 98 1 9 2 0 1 0 0 No B5 5PN RED AMBER 1 10 0 98 1 9 2 0 1 0 0 No B5 5QA RED AMBER 1 10 0 98 1 9 2 0 1 0 0 No B5 5QB RED AMBER 1 10 0 98 1 9 2 0 1 0 0 No B5 5QD RED AMBER 1 10 0 98 1 9 2 0 1 0 0 No B5 5QF RED AMBER 1 10 0 148 2 15 2 0 1 0 0 No B5 5QH RED AMBER 1 10 0 98 1 9 2 0 1 0 0 No B5 5QS RED AMBER 1 10 0 98 1 9 2 0 1 0 0 No B5 5QX RED AMBER 1 10 0 98 1 9 2 0 1 0 0 No B5 5RA RED AMBER 1 10 0 98 1 9 2 0 1 0 0 No B5 5RB RED AMBER 1 10 0 98 1 9 2 0 1 0 0 No B5 5RD RED AMBER 1 10 0 98 1 9 2 0 1 0 0 No B5 5RF RED AMBER 1 10 0 98 1 9 2 0 1 0 0 No B5 5RG RED AMBER 1 10 0 98 1 9 2 0 1 0 0 No B5 5RH RED AMBER 1 10 0 98 1 9 2 1 1 1 0 No B5 5RR RED AMBER 1 10 0 98 1 9 2 0 1 0 0 No B5 5RS RED AMBER 1 10 0 98 1 9 2 0 1 0 0 No B5 5RT RED AMBER 1 10 0 98 1 9 2 0 1 0 0 No B5 5RX RED AMBER 1 10 0 98 1 9 2 0 1 0 0 No B5 5SA RED AMBER 1 10 0 98 1 9 2 0 1 0 0 No B5 5SE RED AMBER 1 10 0 98 1 9 2 4 1 0 0 No B5 5SL RED AMBER 1 10 0 148 2 15 2 0 1 0 0 No B5 5SR RED AMBER 1 10 0 148 2 15 2 1 1 0 0 No B5 5SS RED AMBER 1 10 0 148 2 15 2 0 1 0 0 No B5 5ST RED AMBER 1 10 0 148 2 15 2 0 1 0 0 No B5 5SU RED AMBER 1 10 0 148 2 15 2 1 1 0 0 No Page 96 of 152 B5 5TE RED AMBER 1 10 0 98 1 9 2 0 1 0 0 No B5 5TH RED AMBER 1 10 0 98 1 9 2 0 1 0 0 No B5 5TJ RED AMBER 1 10 0 98 1 9 2 0 1 1 0 No B5 5TL RED AMBER 1 10 0 148 2 15 2 0 1 0 0 No B5 5TP RED AMBER 1 10 0 148 2 15 2 0 1 0 0 No B5 5TR RED AMBER 1 10 0 148 2 15 2 0 1 0 0 No B5 6AH RED AMBER 1 10 0 124 2 21 2 1 2 0 0 No B5 6AX RED AMBER 1 10 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 0 0 No B5 6AY RED AMBER 1 10 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 0 0 No B5 6BB RED AMBER 1 10 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 0 0 No B5 6BH RED AMBER 1 10 2 963 2 68 2 1 2 0 2 No B5 6BJ RED AMBER 1 10 2 963 2 68 2 0 2 0 2 No B5 6BS RED AMBER 1 10 2 963 2 68 2 0 2 0 2 No B5 6DD RED AMBER 1 10 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 0 0 No B5 6DH RED AMBER 1 10 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 1 0 No B5 6DR RED AMBER 1 10 0 98 1 9 2 0 1 0 0 No B5 6DT RED AMBER 1 10 0 98 1 9 2 1 1 0 0 No B5 6DY RED AMBER 1 10 0 148 2 15 2 6 1 0 0 No B5 6ES RED AMBER 1 10 2 963 2 68 2 0 2 0 2 No B5 6ET RED AMBER 1 10 0 124 2 21 2 1 2 0 0 No B5 6HA RED AMBER 1 10 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 0 0 No B5 6HT RED AMBER 1 10 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 0 0 No B5 6HX RED AMBER 1 10 0 124 2 21 2 1 2 0 0 No B5 6JL RED AMBER 1 10 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 0 0 No B5 6JP RED AMBER 1 10 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 0 0 No B5 6JX RED AMBER 1 10 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 0 0 No B5 6LB RED AMBER 1 10 0 124 2 21 2 2 2 1 0 No B5 6LE RED AMBER 1 10 0 124 2 21 2 2 2 0 0 No B5 6LG RED AMBER 1 10 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 0 0 No B5 6LT RED AMBER 1 10 0 124 2 21 2 2 2 0 0 No B5 6LU RED AMBER 1 10 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 0 0 No B5 6NB RED AMBER 1 10 0 124 2 21 2 3 2 0 0 No B5 6QN RED AMBER 1 10 0 123 2 27 2 0 1 0 2 No B5 6QP RED AMBER 1 10 0 123 2 27 2 1 1 0 2 No B5 6RL RED AMBER 1 10 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 0 0 No B5 6TG RED AMBER 1 10 0 124 2 21 2 1 2 0 0 No B4 7AJ RED AMBER 2 13 0 98 1 9 2 0 1 0 0 No B4 7AL RED AMBER 2 13 0 98 1 9 2 0 1 0 0 No B4 7AN RED AMBER 2 13 0 98 1 9 2 0 1 0 0 No B4 7AP RED AMBER 2 13 0 98 1 9 2 0 1 0 0 No B4 7AQ RED AMBER 2 13 0 98 1 9 2 0 1 0 0 No B4 7AW RED AMBER 2 13 0 98 1 9 2 0 1 0 0 No B4 7DA RED AMBER 2 13 0 98 1 9 2 0 1 0 0 No Page 97 of 152 B4 7DU RED AMBER 2 13 0 98 1 9 2 0 1 0 0 No B4 7DX RED AMBER 2 13 0 98 1 9 2 0 1 0 0 No B4 7EB AMBER AMBER 2 13 0 139 1 10 2 0 2 0 0 No B4 7ED RED AMBER 2 13 0 98 1 9 2 0 1 0 0 No B4 7EG AMBER AMBER 2 13 0 139 1 10 2 0 2 0 0 No B4 7EJ AMBER AMBER 2 13 0 139 1 10 2 0 2 0 0 No B4 7ER RED AMBER 2 13 0 98 1 9 2 1 1 0 0 No B4 7ES RED AMBER 2 13 0 98 1 9 2 1 1 0 0 No B4 7ET RED AMBER 2 13 0 98 1 9 2 4 1 1 0 No B4 7PB AMBER AMBER 2 13 0 139 1 10 2 0 2 0 0 No B4 7PS AMBER AMBER 2 13 0 139 1 10 2 1 2 0 0 No B4 7RJ RED AMBER 2 13 0 98 1 9 2 0 1 0 0 No B4 7RQ RED AMBER 2 13 0 98 1 9 2 0 1 0 0 No B4 7UL RED AMBER 2 13 0 98 1 9 2 1 1 0 0 No B4 7XE RED AMBER 2 13 0 98 1 9 2 0 1 0 0 No B4 7XG RED AMBER 2 13 0 98 1 9 2 2 1 0 0 No B4 7XH YELLOW AMBER 2 13 0 22 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 No B4 7XT RED AMBER 2 13 0 98 1 9 2 0 1 0 0 No B12 0LX RED AMBER 1 15 0 124 2 21 2 0 2 0 0 No B4 7BD AMBER AMBER 2 13 0 139 1 10 2 0 2 0 0 No B4 7EH RED AMBER 2 13 0 98 1 9 2 0 1 0 0 No B4 7EL RED AMBER 2 13 0 98 1 9 2 0 1 0 0 No B4 7EN RED AMBER 2 13 0 98 1 9 2 0 1 0 0 No B4 7EW RED AMBER 2 13 0 98 1 9 2 0 1 0 0 No B4 7UJ RED AMBER 2 13 2 963 2 68 2 0 2 0 2 No B5 5JP AMBER AMBER 1 10 0 139 1 10 2 0 2 0 0 No B7 4AG RED AMBER 1 3 0 98 1 9 2 0 1 0 0 No B7 4BL RED AMBER 1 3 0 98 1 9 2 0 1 0 0 No B9 4AT RED AMBER 1 9 0 148 2 15 2 0 1 0 0 No B9 4DJ RED AMBER 1 9 0 148 2 15 2 0 1 0 0 No B9 4DP RED AMBER 1 9 0 148 2 15 2 0 1 0 0 No

Page 98 of 152 Underage Sales Underage Sales Underage Sales Any Alcohol Specific Liver Disease Fire Services Safeguarding Justified Counterfeit Activity Alcohol Item Deaths Preventable Death Complaints

LSOA - Post LSOA - Post LSOA - Post LSOA - Post LSOA - Post Ward - Ward - LSOA - Score (0- Code - Score (0- Code - Score (0- Code - Score (0- Code - Score (0- Code - Score (0- Ward - Score (0- Ward - Score (0- 2) Count 2) Count 2) Count 2) Count 2) Count 2) DSR 2) DSR 2) 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0Page 99 0of 152 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 2 3 0 1 0 1 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0Page 1000 of 152 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 2 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0Page 1010 of 152 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 12.50466 1 25.26731 0 Page 102 of 152 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 Page 103 of 152 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 Page 104 of 152 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 Page 105 of 152 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 18.81964 1 41.16997 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 21.10136 1 28.87589 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 21.10136 1 28.87589 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 18.81964 1 41.16997 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0 1 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 28.91275 1 28.24351 0

Page 106 of 152 Alcohol Related Commissioned Counterfeit Activity District Priority Binge Drinking Hospital MH Adults Services District Ward Service Admissions

Post District - MSOA - MSOA - MSOA - MSOA - MSOA - District - Code - Score (0 District - Score (0- Indicator Score (0- Indicator Score (0- MSOA - Score (0- District - Count or 2) Yes / No 2) Value 2) Value 2) Rate 2) Rate 0 2 Yes 0 6 2 178.8 2 0.234823 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 6 2 178.8 2 0.234823 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 6 2 178.8 2 0.234823 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 6 2 178.8 2 0.234823 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 6 2 178.8 2 0.234823 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 6 2 178.8 2 0.234823 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 6 2 178.8 2 0.234823 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 6 2 178.8 2 0.234823 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 6 2 178.8 2 0.234823 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 6 2 178.8 2 0.234823 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 6 2 178.8 2 0.234823 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 6 2 178.8 2 0.234823 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 6 2 178.8 2 0.234823 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 6 2 178.8 2 0.234823 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 6 2 178.8 2 0.234823 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 6 2 178.8 2 0.234823 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 6 2 178.8 2 0.234823 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 6 2 178.8 2 0.234823 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 6 2 178.8 2 0.234823 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 6 2 178.8 2 0.234823 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 6 2 178.8 2 0.234823 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 6 2 178.8 2 0.234823 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 6 2 178.8 2 0.234823 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 6 2 178.8 2 0.234823 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 6 2 178.8 2 0.234823 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9Page 1072 of 1520.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 6 2 178.8 2 0.234823 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 6 2 178.8 2 0.234823 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 4 1 105.7 1 0.076963 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 4 1 105.7 1 0.076963 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 4 1 105.7 1 0.076963 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 6 2 178.8 2 0.234823 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 6 2 178.8 2 0.234823 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9Page 1082 of 1520.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 6 2 178.8 2 0.234823 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 6 2 178.8 2 0.234823 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 6 2 178.8 2 0.234823 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 6 2 178.8 2 0.234823 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 6 2 178.8 2 0.234823 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 6 2 178.8 2 0.234823 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 6 2 178.8 2 0.234823 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 6 2 178.8 2 0.234823 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 6 2 178.8 2 0.234823 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 6 2 178.8 2 0.234823 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 6 2 178.8 2 0.234823 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 6 2 178.8 2 0.234823 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 6 2 178.8 2 0.234823 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 6 2 178.8 2 0.234823 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 6 2 178.8 2 0.234823 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 6 2 178.8 2 0.234823 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 6 2 178.8 2 0.234823 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 6 2 178.8 2 0.234823 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 6 2 178.8 2 0.234823 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 6 2 178.8 2 0.234823 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 6 2 178.8 2 0.234823 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 6 2 178.8 2 0.234823 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 6 2 178.8 2 0.234823 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 6 2 178.8 2 0.234823 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 6 2 178.8 2 0.234823 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 6 2 178.8 2 0.234823 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 6 2 178.8 2 0.234823 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 6 2 178.8 2 0.234823 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 6 2 178.8 2 0.234823 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 6 2 178.8 2 0.234823 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 6 2 178.8 2 0.234823 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 6 2 178.8 2 0.234823 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 6 2 178.8 2 0.234823 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 6 2 178.8Page 1092 of0.234823 152 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 4 1 105.7 1 0.076963 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 4 1 105.7 1 0.076963 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 4 1 105.7 1 0.076963 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 4 1 105.7 1 0.076963 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 4 1 105.7 1 0.076963 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 4 1 105.7 1 0.076963 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 4 1 105.7 1 0.076963 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 4 1 105.7 1 0.076963 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 4 1 105.7 1 0.076963 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 4 1 105.7 1 0.076963 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 4 1 105.7 1 0.076963 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 4 1 105.7 1 0.076963 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 4 1 105.7 1 0.076963 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 4 1 105.7 1 0.076963 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 4 1 105.7 1 0.076963 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 4 1 105.7 1 0.076963 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 4 1 105.7 1 0.076963 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 4 1 105.7 1 0.076963 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 4 1 105.7 1 0.076963 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 4 1 105.7 1 0.076963 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 4 1 105.7 1 0.076963 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 4 1 105.7 1 0.076963 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 4 1 105.7 1 0.076963 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 4 1 105.7 1 0.076963 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 4 1 105.7 1 0.076963 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 4 1 105.7 1 0.076963 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 187.7 2 0.216204 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 187.7 2 0.216204 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 0 No 1 22.1 2 187.7 2 0.216204 0 0.002755 Edgbaston Edgbaston Page 110 of 152 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 187.7 2 0.216204 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 187.7 2 0.216204 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 6 2 178.8 2 0.234823 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 6 2 178.8 2 0.234823 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 6 2 178.8 2 0.234823 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 187.7 2 0.216204 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 187.7 2 0.216204 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 187.7 2 0.216204 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 187.7 2 0.216204 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 187.7 2 0.216204 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 187.7 2 0.216204 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 6 2 178.8 2 0.234823 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 187.7 2 0.216204 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 6 2 178.8 2 0.234823 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 187.7 2 0.216204 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 6 2 178.8 2 0.234823 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 6 2 178.8 2 0.234823 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 6 2 178.8 2 0.234823 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells Page 111 of 152 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 4 1 105.7 1 0.076963 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 4 1 105.7 1 0.076963 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 4 1 105.7 1 0.076963 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 4 1 105.7 1 0.076963 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 4 1 105.7 1 0.076963 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 4 1 105.7 1 0.076963 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 4 1 105.7 1 0.076963 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 4 1 105.7 1 0.076963 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 4 1 105.7 1 0.076963 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 4 1 105.7 1 0.076963 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 4 1 105.7 1 0.076963 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells Page 112 of 152 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 4 1 105.7 1 0.076963 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 4 1 105.7 1 0.076963 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 4 1 105.7 1 0.076963 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 4 1 105.7 1 0.076963 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 187.7 2 0.216204 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 187.7 2 0.216204 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells Page 113 of 152 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 6.3 1 101.4 2 0.104348 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Aston 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Ladywood 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 22.1 2 181.9 2 0.22402 1 0.003797 Ladywood Ladywood 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 1 23.4 2 196.4 2 0.253539 1 0.003797 Ladywood Aston 0 2 Yes 0 4 1 105.7 1 0.076963 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 4 1 105.7 1 0.076963 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells 0 2 Yes 0 4 1 105.7 1 0.076963 1 0.003797 Ladywood Nechells

Page 114 of 152 BIRMINGHAM CITY COUNCIL

REPORT OF THE ACTING DIRECTOR OF REGULATION AND ENFORCEMENT TO THE LICENSING AND PUBLIC PROTECTION COMMITTEE

19 OCTOBER 2016 ALL WARDS

LICENSING AND PUBLIC PROTECTION COMMITTEE MINUTE TAKING AND PAPERLESS REPORTS

1. Summary

1.1 This report sets out proposals to allow Committee and Member Services to produce shorter sets of minutes for meetings of the Licensing and Public Protection Committee (“Committee”), where appropriate, and to move to a paperless system of report distribution in order to respond to reductions in the number of Committee Managers in that service.

2. Recommendations

2.1 That the Committee approves the changes to the way in which minutes will be recorded of meetings of the Licensing and Public Protection Committee as outlined in paragraphs 4.1 to 4.3 of this report with effect from its scheduled meeting on 16 th November 2016.

2.2 That the Committee approves the proposal to stop circulating paper copies of reports for meetings of the Licensing and Public Protection Committee as outlined in paragraphs 5.1 to 5.3 of this report and adopts an electronic system of paperless reports with effect from April 2017.

Contact Officer: Chris Neville, Head of Licensing Telephone: 303 6920 E-mail: [email protected]

Page 115 of 152

1 3. Background

3.1 Members are aware that minutes of Licensing and Public Protection Committee meetings are presented for approval at every meeting for the preceding meeting. It has become necessary to review the extent to which officers in Committee and Member Services can continue to produce minutes for all meetings, taking into account the impact that reduced budgets have had on their staffing levels and resources. Consideration has also been given to moving towards a paperless system of producing reports for the Licensing and Public Protection Committee in order to reduce the amount of time and money to print and photocopy reports.

3.2 It is recognised that the work undertaken by Licensing Sub Committees must be recorded in minutes which explain why decisions have been made and the rationale for them. Sub Committees, in almost every case, are making decisions about licence applications (whether for drivers, vehicles, operators or premises) or are dealing with review applications or matters to consider contraventions of licence conditions. Detailed minutes must be kept to allow the applicant or other interested parties to understand the decision and the reasons for it and also to enable the applicant to form the basis of an appeal should they consider it to be appropriate.

3.3 Minutes of meetings that are considered under the private agenda of the Licensing and Public Protection Committee must also be recorded in detail as the minutes are the only record of such a meeting, whereas matters considered under the public agenda are currently live-streamed on the internet. In any of the cases identified above officers do not propose to make any changes to the current system.

3.4 Officers are proposing to change the way in which minutes are taken for meetings of the Licensing and Public Protection Committee in respect of reports which do not require decisions to be made by the Committee that are open to challenge or appeal.

3.5 Section 100C of the Local Government Act 1972 (as inserted by the Local Government (Access to Information) Act 1985) requires ‘principal councils’ to keep open for inspection by members of the public minutes of meetings for a period of six years after the meeting. The Act does not define the form that minutes must take but they must be a fair reflection of the meeting.

4. Proposal for the Minutes of the Licensing and Public Protection Committee

4.1 It is proposed that after the 16 th November meeting of the Committee, the minutes will no longer contain detailed notes of specific conversations or statements made by individual members or officers in order to reduce the length of the minutes and, therefore, the time taken to reproduce them. The objective of the minutes will only be to record the outcomes of the meeting and the decision(s) made. Where the purpose of a report to the Licensing and Public Protection Committee is to determine an application for a licence

Page 116 of 152

2 (e.g. Sexual Entertainment Venue applications) or to consider a request for an exemption to a licence condition, minutes will be recorded in full.

4.2 Reports that would be affected by this decision and which would result in abbreviated minutes would be those that are presented merely for noting, as the report itself is the record of the decision or those seeking approval to the recommendations in the report.

4.3 As set out above, all meetings of the Committee are now live-streamed on the internet. A recording is made of every meeting (apart from matters considered on the private agenda) which is available for the general public to view for 6 months. Video copies of every such meeting are then made and retained on DVD discs. This ensures that in the event of a question arising over what was said at a meeting or how a decision was reached, it is always possible to review the meeting at a later date regardless of the absence of detailed minutes.

5. Proposals for Paperless Meetings

5.1 Further efficiencies can be achieved by moving from the current system of producing paper copies of all reports to a system of circulating reports electronically. Significant amounts of paper are used to copy the reports that are circulated to all members for every meeting. Circulating reports electronically would be cheaper, quicker, and more environmentally friendly and the amount of time that officers currently spend copying and circulating documents would be saved.

5.2 Members would require an electronic device to read reports in meetings. These can be lap top computers, iPads or tablet devices. Most members have already been issued with one or the other.

5.3 If members agree to this proposal officers will introduce a paperless system for the meeting of the January Committee alongside paper copies of reports. This would be with a view to going completely paperless with effect from April 2017, subject to a satisfactory outcome from the trial.

6. Comparison with other Committees

6.1 The Council’s Planning Committee and Overview and Scrutiny Committee have already adopted a similar approach to minute taking. The minutes of the September meeting of the Licensing and Public Protection Committee which are produced as part of the agenda for this month’s meeting have been produced in a very similar style to the one that is proposed by this report. The Planning Committee no longer works with paper copies of reports.

Page 117 of 152

3 7. Consultation

7.1 By ensuring that full minutes are made for meetings of the Committee where application or exemption decisions are made and for all meetings of Licensing Sub Committees, officers do not consider that consultation is required beyond the members of the Committee itself. The consequences of not having paper copies of reports will only affect Members and, therefore, wider consultation is not considered necessary.

8. Implications for Resources

8.1 The proposals in this report will reduce the amount of time taken to produce detailed minutes and to print, copy and distribute paper reports which will assist the Council to manage its business in the light of reduced resources. One Committee Manager’s post is funded from the Licensing budget and additional support is provided from the team of Committee Managers in the Committee and Member Services Team. There will be no additional costs associated with the technology required for Members to access reports electronically as Members have already been issued with devices.

9. Implications for Policy Priorities

9.1 The work identified in this report will respond to the general modernisation agenda that is set out by the Future Council programme. None of the proposals in this report will have any effect on the way in which meetings are live-streamed.

10. Implications for Equality and Diversity

10.1 Officers have considered the Public Sector Equality Duty in accordance with the provisions of the Equalities Act 2010 and determined that there are no Equality and Diversity implications in this report because of the nature of the decisions recommended.

ACTING DIRECTOR OF REGULATION AND ENFORCMENT

Background Papers: Nil

Page 118 of 152

4 BIRMINGHAM CITY COUNCIL

REPORT OF THE ACTING DIRECTOR REGULATION AND ENFORCEMENT TO THE LICENSING AND PUBLIC PROTECTION COMMITTEE

19 OCTOBER 2016 ALL WARDS

PROSECUTIONS AND CAUTIONS – JULY 2016

1. Summary

1.1 This report summarises the outcome of legal proceedings taken by Regulation and Enforcement during the month of July 2016.

2. Recommendation

2.1 That the report be noted.

Contact Officer: Alison Harwood, Acting Director of Regulation and Enforcement Telephone: 0121 303 0201 E-Mail: [email protected]

Page 119 of 152 1 3. Results

3.1 During the month of July 2016 the following cases were heard at Birmingham Magistrates Court, unless otherwise stated:

° There were no licensing cases finalised during July 2016. Fourteen simple cautions were administered as set out in Appendix 1. ° Fifty-five Environmental Health cases resulted in fines of £39,925 and prosecution costs of £18,787 were awarded as set out in Appendix 2. No simple cautions were administered. ° One Trading Standards case resulted in a total fine of £3,500. Prosecution costs of £4,000 were awarded as set out in Appendix 3. No simple cautions were administered. ° Appendix 4 lists cases finalised by district in July 2016 and cases finalised by district April-July 2016. ° Appendix 5 lists the enforcement activity undertaken by the Waste Enforcement Team from April-July 2016.

4. Consultation

4.1 The Enforcement Policy that underpins the work identified in this report is approved by your Committee. The policy reflects the views of the public and business in terms of the regulation duties of the Council. Any enforcement action[s] taken as a result of the contents of this report are subject to that Enforcement Policy.

5. Implications for Resources

5.1 Costs incurred in investigating and preparing prosecutions, including officers’ time, the professional fees of expert witnesses etc. are recorded as prosecution costs. Arrangements have been made with the Magistrates Court for any costs awarded to be reimbursed to the City Council. Monies paid in respect of fines are paid to the Treasury.

5.2 For the year April 2016 to July 2016 the following costs have been requested and awarded:

Licensing £8,887 has been requested with £7,109 being awarded (79%)

Environmental Health £70,105 has been requested with £60,132 being awarded (85%).

Trading Standards £30,876 has been requested with £6,700 being awarded (21%).

Page 120 of 152 2 5.3 For the month of July 2016 the following costs have been requested and awarded:

Licensing No costs have been requested or awarded.

Environmental Health £20,776 has been requested with £18,787 being awarded (90%).

Trading Standards £4,676 has been requested with £4,000 being awarded (85%).

6. Implications for Policy Priorities

6.1 The contents of this report contribute to the priority action of ensuring business compliance with legislation to protect the economic interests of consumers and businesses as contained in the Council Business Plan 2015+.

7. Public Sector Equality Duty

7.1 The actions identified in this report were taken in accordance with the Enforcement Policy of the Licensing and Public Protection Committee which ensures that equality issues have been addressed.

ACTING DIRECTOR OF REGULATION AND ENFORCEMENT

Background Papers: Nil

Page 121 of 152 3 LICENSING CASES APPENDIX 1

There were no Licensing cases finalised in July 2016.

LICENSING SIMPLE CAUTIONS

During the period of July 2016, 14 simple cautions have been administered.

Local Government (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1976 Section 48(6) Four cautions were issued for failing to display a private hire vehicle licence plate . Section 54(2) One caution was issued for failing to wear a private hire driver’s badge in a manner as to be plainly and distinctly visible. Sections 48(6) & 54(2) One caution was issued for failing to display private hire vehicle licence plate and wear a private hire driver’s badge.

Licensing Act 2003 Section 57 Two cautions were issued for failing to produce upon request a copy of a premises licence when requested to do so by an authorised officer. Section 136(a) One caution was issued for carrying on a licensable activity in breach of a licence condition.

Byelaw 26 of the Birmingham City Council Hackney Carriage Byelaws 2008 made under section 68 of the Town Police Clauses Act 1847 and section 171 of the Public Health Act 1875 Five cautions were issued for failing to produce upon request a copy of the Hackney Carriage Byelaws for inspection.

Page 122 of 152 4 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH CASES APPENDIX 2

WASTE OFFENCES Name & Address Date Case Legislation Fine/Penalty Costs Offence details Heard 1 Sandeep Kumar 4/7/16 Environmental £200 £700 Pleaded guilty to one offence of failing to 261 Lichfield Road Protection Act prevent the escape of waste from Lichfield Birmingham 1990 (£1,434 Road Store, 261-262 Lichfield Road, B6 7QP requested) Birmingham as black bin bags containing waste and documentation from the business were found on Crawford Road, Birmingham. Originally listed for trial. 2 Elhadi Ebbakar Adam 7/7/16 Environmental 12 month £694 Pleaded guilty to one offence of depositing Suiam Protection Act conditional or knowingly causing the deposit of Flat 23, Warwick 1990 discharge (£694 controlled waste (fly tipping), namely a black Court requested) bag containing waste relating to A & R 35 Wake Green Road Computers, 567 Coventry Road, Birmingham B13 9HF Birmingham, on the pavement between 567 and 568 Coventry Road. 3 Premium Halal Meat 11/7/16 Environmental £24,000 £1,541 Pleaded guilty to one offence of failing to & Poultry Ltd Protection Act ensure the escape of waste from the Unit W5 1990 (£1,541 company at their premises in Bissell Street, The Saturn Centre requested) Birmingham between 31 st March 2015 and Bissell Street 19 th June 2015, rubbish from the business Birmingham was found on Bissell Street on a number of B5 7HP occasions. Notification received that Company intend to appeal against conviction. 4 Arvind Kaur Khokhar 21/7/16 Prevention of £50 £2,591 Found guilty in his absence of one offence of 33 Hales Crescent Damage by failing to eradicate the rat infestation and Smethwick Pests Act 1949 (£2,591 remove and clear all overgrown bushes B67 6QR requested) vegetation, bulky waste and other debris likely to attract or harbour rodents from the rear garden of 64 Kings Road, Sutton Coldfield. Page 123 of 152 5

Name & Address Date Case Legislation Fine/Penalty Costs Offence details Heard 5 Haider Naqvi 22/7/16 Environmental TOTAL £800 £601 Pleaded guilty to three offences: two of Flat above Protection Act knowingly causing controlled waste (fly 2 Alum Rock Road 1990 (£400 x 2 (£601 tipping), namely black bags of waste relating Birmingham No separate requested) to Shah Gee, 2 Alum Rock Road, B8 1JB penalty x Birmingham to be deposited on land inside a offence 3) fenced off area to the rear of 2 Alum Rock Road and on the pavement in front of the premises and one offence of failing to keep written records of the transfer of waste and producing them to an authorised officer

ANIMAL WELFARE Name & Address Date Case Legislation Fine Costs Offence details Heard /Penalty 1 Stefan Toia 1/7/16 The Clean £1,000 £329 Found guilty in his absence of one offence 91 Harleston Road Neighbourhoods of being in charge of a dog and failing to Kingstanding and Environment (£329 ensure that it was kept on a lead, the dog Birmingham Act 1995 requested) was found roaming off the lead in B44 9RP The Dogs on Greenholme Road, Kingstanding, Leads Order Birmingham. 2014 2 Jadwiga Ewa Grum 6/7/16 Pet Animals Act 12 month £500 Pleaded guilty to one offence of keeping 137 Johnson Road 1951 conditional premises at 137 Johnson Road, Erdington, Erdington discharge. (£1,505 Birmingham as a pet shop without a licence. Birmingham requested) Originally listed for trial B23 6QA Disqualified from keeping a pet shop for 24 months.

Page 124 of 152 6 FOOD HYGIENE OFFENCES Name & Address Date Case Legislation Fine/Penalty Costs Offence details Heard 1 Pinnu Khan 1/7/16 Food Safety and £4,000 x £1,014 Pleaded guilty to five offences relating to the 2 Eva Road Hygiene offence 1 condition of Jamaican Food Store, 372-374 Winson Green (England) (£1,014 Dudley Road, Birmingham. There was Birmingham Regulations No separate requested) evidence of mouse activity throughout the B18 4NQ 2013 penalty on premises and gnawed food packaging was remaining found in the store room. There were offences potential pest entry points in the toilet area and evidence of a fly infestation. The toilet area was dirty and food was stored there. There was no evidence of staff being trained in food hygiene. 2 ALP- AAHAR UK Ltd 6/7/16 Food Safety and £2,000 x 1 st £1,692 Pleaded guilty to three offences relating to 8 Houston House Hygiene offence the condition of Subway, The Pavilions 1 Waterside (England) (£1,692 Shopping Centre, 38 High Street, Hockley Regulations No separate requested) Birmingham. There was evidence of mouse Birmingham 2013 penalty on activity throughout the premises and there B18 5RY remaining was a gap beneath the side external door offences large enough to allow access to pests. Mouse droppings, were found next to food packaging materials. 3 Sumeet Bhalla 7/7/16 Food Safety and £480 x offence £1,050 Pleaded guilty to four offences relating to 644 Church Road Hygiene 1 the condition of Tyseley Chippy, 547 Yardley (England) (£1,050 Warwick Road, Tyseley, Birmingham. Birmingham Regulations No separate requested) Mouse droppings and dead mice were B33 8HB 2013 penalty on found throughout the premises. Gaps within remaining the structure allowed access to pests and offences gnawed polystyrene was found in the server area. Mouse droppings were found in the cupboard where herbs and spices were stored and in the salad display chiller.

Page 125 of 152 7 LITTERING OFFENCES Name & Address Date Case Legislation Fine/Penalty Costs Offence details Heard 1 Michael Kent 1/7/16 Environmental £230 £175 Found guilty in his absence of one offence 47 Warwards Lane Protection Act of dropping a cigarette butt on the pavement Birmingham 1990 (£175 outside Costa on Colmore Row, B29 7RA requested) Birmingham. 2 Matthew Blackmore 1/7/16 Environmental £220 £175 Found guilty in his absence of one offence 22 Winslow Avenue Protection Act of dropping a cigarette butt on the pavement Worcester 1990 (£175 outside The Shakespeare on Lower Temple WR9 8PX requested) Street, Birmingham. 3 John Anthony 1/7/16 Environmental £220 £175 Found guilty in his absence of one offence Delahaye Protection Act of dropping a cigarette butt on the pavement Flat 4 1990 (£175 outside Paper and Script on Smallbrook 298 Washwood requested) Queensway, Birmingham. Heath Road Birmingham B8 2UL 4 Victoria Harrison 1/7/16 Environmental £220 £175 Found guilty in her absence of one offence 103 Rilstone Road Protection Act of dropping a cigarette butt on the pavement Birmingham 1990 (£175 outside Specsavers on New Street, B32 2NT requested) Birmingham. 5 Kirsty Reading 1/7/16 Environmental £220 £175 Found guilty in her absence of one offence 163 Swinford Road Protection Act of dropping a cigarette butt outside Moor Weoley Castle 1990 (£175 Street station on Moor Street Queensway, Birmingham requested) Birmingham. B29 5SE 6 Sam Smith 1/7/16 Environmental £220 £175 Found guilty in his absence of one offence 31 Butcroft Gardens Protection Act of dropping a cigarette butt on the pavement Kings Hill 1990 (£175 outside News Shop on Corporation Street, WS10 9LE requested) Birmingham.

Page 126 of 152 8

Name & Address Date Case Legislation Fine/Penalty Costs Offence details Heard 7 Adam Griffiths 1/7/16 Environmental £40 £175 Pleaded guilty to one offence of dropping a 63 Ethel Street Protection Act cigarette butt on the pavement outside Meal Bearwood 1990 (£175 Deal on New Street, Birmingham. Birmingham requested) B67 5AJ 8 Patrick Chilton 1/7/16 Environmental £80 £175 Pleaded guilty to one offence of dropping a 3 Baldwins Close Protection Act cigarette butt on the pavement near Paddy Royton 1990 (£175 Power on Stephenson Place, Birmingham. Oldham requested) OL2 5FG 9 Kamila Kimberley 1/7/16 Environmental £65 £175 Pleaded guilty to one offence of dropping a 17 Ward End Road Protection Act cigarette butt in a plant bed outside New Ward End 1990 (£175 Street Station on Smallbrook Queensway, Birmingham requested) Birmingham. B8 2QU 10 Leanne Harwood 1/7/16 Environmental £40 £100 Pleaded guilty to one offence of dropping a 23 West Mill Croft Protection Act cigarette butt on the pavement outside Birmingham 1990 (£175 Select on New Street, Birmingham. B38 9US requested) 11 Ian Johnson 1/7/16 Environmental £40 £175 Pleaded guilty to one offence of dropping a Woodend Farm Protection Act cigarette butt down the drain opposite Bromyard Road 1990 (£175 Cashino on Bull Street, Birmingham. Cradley, Malvern requested) Worcestershire WR13 5JW

Page 127 of 152 9

Name & Address Date Case Legisla tion Fine/Penalty Costs Offence details Heard 12 Laurentiu- Ionel 7/7/16 Environmental £80 £175 Pleaded guilty to one offence of dropping a Stroe Protection Act cigarette butt on the pavement outside 12 Aylesford Road 1990 (£175 Currys/ PC World on High Street, Birmingham requested) Birmingham. B21 8DW 13 Motilal Nayyar 7/7/16 Environmental £125 £175 Pleaded guilty to one offence of dropping a 41 South Road Protection Act cigarette butt on the pavement outside Hockley 1990 (£175 building number 23 on Bennetts Hill, Birmingham requested) Birmingham. B18 5NA 14 Lisa Turrell 7/7/16 Environmental £40 £175 Pleaded guilty to one offence of dropping a 30 Monkshood Protection Act cigarette butt on the pavement outside Retreat 1990 (£175 HSBC on Stephenson Place, Birmingham. Birmingham requested) B38 9QG 15 Rajdeep Sanger 7/7/16 Environmental £40 £175 Pleaded guilty to one offence of dropping a 32 City Walk Protection Act cigarette butt on the pavement opposite City Road 1990 (£175 Santander on Union Street, Birmingham. Derby requested) DE1 3QD 16 Sudhir Kumar 7/7/16 Environmental £85 £175 Pleaded guilty to one offence of dropping a AKA Sudhir Kumar Protection Act cigarette butt down the drain outside New Lotia 1990 (£175 Street Station on Stephenson Street, 53 Park Hall Road requested) Birmingham. Walsall WS5 3HL

Page 128 of 152 10

Name & Address Date Case Legislation Fine/Penalty Costs Offence details Heard 17 Diana Agbonlahor 7/7/16 Environmental £220 £175 Found guilty in her absence of one offence 204 waterloo Road Protection Act of dropping a cigarette butt outside New Smethwick 1990 (£175 Street station on Stephenson Street, B66 4NB requested) Birmingham. 18 Connor Brockhouse 7/7/16 Environmental £220 £175 Found guilty in his absence of one offence 42 Rectory Park Protection Act of dropping a cigarette butt on the pavement Road 1990 (£175 outside Primark on New Street, Birmingham requested) Birmingham. B26 3LJ 19 Jonathan Colley 7/7/16 Environmental £220 £175 Found guilty in his absence of one offence 93 Plymouth Road Protection Act of dropping a cigarette butt on the pavement Redditch 1990 (£175 outside Meal Deal on New Street, Worcestershire requested) Birmingham. B97 4PH 20 James Crofts 7/7/16 Environmental £220 £175 Found guilty in his absence of one offence 33 Brookvale Park Protection Act of dropping a cigarette butt on the pavement Road 1990 (£175 outside Square Peg on Corporation Street, Birmingham requested) Birmingham. B23 7TS 21 Kyle Benjamin 7/7/16 Environmental £220 £175 Found guilty in his absence of one offence Donaghy Protection Act of dropping a cigarette butt on the pavement 541 Aldridge Road 1990 (£175 outside Card Factory on High Street, Kingstanding requested) Birmingham. Birmingham B44 8NA

Page 129 of 152 11

Name & Address Date Case Legislation Fine/Penalty Costs Offence details Heard 22 Maria Hayles 7/7/16 Environmental £220 £175 Found guilty in her absence of one offence 58 St Marks Protection Act of dropping a cigarette butt on the pavement Crescent 1990 (£175 outside Cashino on New Street, Birmingham requested) Birmingham. B1 2PX 23 Rama Krishnam 7/7/16 Environmental £220 £175 Found guilty in his absence of one offence Raju Kodiganti Protection Act of dropping a piece of chewing gum on the Flat 1 1990 (£175 pavement near Primark on New Street, 47-49 Stoke Road requested) Birmingham. Stoke on Trent ST4 2QW 24 Hannah Paige 7/7/16 Environmental £220 £175 Found guilty in her absence of one offence Ludlow Protection Act of dropping a cigarette butt on the pavement 44 Hampstead Road 1990 (£175 outside Oasis on New Street, Birmingham. Birmingham requested) B19 1DB 25 Imran Hussain Miah 7/7/16 Environmental £220 £175 Found guilty in his absence of one offence 104 Coldbath Road Protection Act of dropping a cigarette butt on the pavement Birmingham 1990 (£175 outside House of Fraser on Cherry Street, B13 0AH requested) Birmingham. 26 Mohammed Suhair 7/7/16 Environmental £220 £175 Found guilty in his absence of one offence Orikkal Parambil Protection Act of dropping a cigarette butt on the pavement 66 Ruban Road 1990 (£175 outside Oasis on New Street, Birmingham. Wrexham requested) LL13 7PH

Page 130 of 152 12

Name & Address Date Case Legislation Fine/Penalty Costs Offence details Heard 27 Michael Rice 7/7/16 Environmental £220 £175 Found guilty in his absence of one offence 24 Carlwell Street Protection Act of dropping a cigarette butt on the pavement London 1990 (£175 near Colmore Gate on Bull Street, SW17 0SE requested) Birmingham. 28 Emma Sadler 7/7/16 Environmental £220 £175 Found guilty in her absence of one offence 45 Bassett Road Protection Act of dropping a cigarette butt on the pavement Wednesbury 1990 (£175 outside Great Western Arcade on Temple WS10 0HW requested) Row, Birmingham. 29 Lewis Casey 15/7/16 Environmental £220 £175 Found guilty in her absence of one offence 1 Little Clover Close Protection Act of dropping a cigarette butt on the pavement Birmingham 1990 (£175 outside Tesco on New Street, Birmingham. B7 5RS requested) 30 Stephanie Clarke 15/7/16 Environmental £220 £175 Found guilty in her absence of one offence Flat 9 Cadbury Protection Act of dropping a cigarette butt on the pavement House 1990 (£175 outside New Street Station on Stephenson Great Hampton Row requested) Street, Birmingham. Birmingham B19 3BB 31 Shaun Burns- 15/7/16 Environmental £220 £175 Found guilty in his absence of one offence Benko Protection Act of dropping a cigarette butt on the pavement 56 Telford Close 1990 (£175 outside New Street Station on Stephenson Smethwick requested) Street, Birmingham. B67 5PF

Page 131 of 152 13

Name & Address Date Ca se Legislation Fine/Penalty Costs Offence details Heard 32 Katie Hunt 22/7/16 Environmental £40 £150 Pleaded guilty to one offence of dropping a 21 Johnson Road Protection Act cigarette butt on the pavement outside Birmingham 1990 (£325 Boots on High Street, Birmingham. B23 6PU requested) Originally listed for trial. 33 Daniel Welsh 22/7/16 Environmental £220 £325 Found guilty in his absence of one offence 33 Duke of York Protection Act of dropping a cigarette butt on the pavement Avenue 1990 (£325 outside New Street station on Smallbrook Wakefield requested) Queensway, Birmingham. WF2 7BX Originally listed for trial. 34 Steven Brown 22/7/16 Environmental £60 £325 Found guilty in his absence of one offence 57 Barrington Road Protection Act of dropping a cigarette butt on the pavement Rubery 1990 (£325 outside All Bar One, Grand Central, Rednal requested) Birmingham. B45 9EU Originally listed for trial. 35 Jennifer Fox 29/7/16 Environmental £220 £175 Found guilty in his absence of one offence 167 Offmoore Road Protection Act of dropping a cigarette butt on the pavement Kidderminster 1990 (£175 opposite WHSmith, Union Street, DY10 1SB requested) Birmingham 36 Richard Bryant 29/7/16 Environmental £220 £175 Found guilty in his absence of one offence 63 Main Road Protection Act of dropping a cigarette butt on the pavement Portskewett 1990 (£175 outside Café Nero, Stephenson Street, South Wales requested) Birmingham NP26 5UG 37 Vlad Drama 29/7/16 Environmental £220 £175 Found guilty in his absence of one offence 459 Washwood Protection Act of dropping a cigarette butt on the pavement Heath Road 1990 (£175 opposite O2, New Street, Birmingham Birmingham requested) B8 2UY

Page 132 of 152 14 Name & Address Date Case Legislation Fine/Penalty Costs Offence details Heard 39 Michal Partyka 29/7/16 Environmental £220 £175 Found guilty in his absence of one offence Dale Road Protection Act of dropping a cigarette butt on the pavement Redditch 1990 (£175 near Coffee Lounge, Navigation Street Worcestershire requested) Birmingham B98 8HJ 40 Paula Manning 29/7/16 Environmental £220 £175 Found guilty in his absence of one offence 46 Christ Church Protection Act of dropping a cigarette butt on the pavement Road 1990 (£175 outside New Street station, Stephenson Doncaster requested) Street, Birmingham DN1 2QL 41 Zara Taylor aka 29/7/16 Environmental £220 £175 Found guilty in his absence of one offence Zara Nyang Protection Act of dropping a cigarette butt on the pavement Loxley Road 1990 (£175 near the Flight Centre, Colmore Row, Smethwick requested) Birmingham B67 5BL 42 Julie Green 29/7/16 Environmental £220 £175 Found guilty in his absence of one offence 42 Waterside Close Protection Act of dropping a cigarette butt on the pavement Hastings 1990 (£175 outside Baguette World, Bull Street, TN35 5TD requested) Birmingham 43 Jennifer Dutton 29/7/16 Environmental £40 £175 Pleaded guilty to one offence of dropping a 14 Caldwell Road Protection Act cigarette on the pavement outside Bordesley Green 1990 (£175 Poundland, Union Street, Birmingham Birmingham requested) B9 5TQ 44 Connor Malins 29/7/16 Environmental £145 £175 Pleaded guilty to one offence of dropping a 21 Corron Hill Protection Act cigarette on the pavement outside New Cobham Road 1990 (£175 Street station, Navigation Street, Halesowen requested) Birmingham B63 3JY

Page 133 of 152 15

Name & Address Date Case Legislation Fine/Penalty Costs Offence details Heard 45 Kerry McMahon 29/7/16 Environmental £45 £175 Pleaded guilty to one offence of dropping a 15 Brockwell Road Protection Act cigarette on the pavement outside Great Barr 1990 (£175 Carphone Warehouse, Union Street, Birmingham requested) Birmingham B44 9PF

ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SIMPLE CAUTIONS During July 2016 no simple cautions were administered.

Page 134 of 152 16 TRADING STANDARDS CASES APPENDIX 3

Name & Address Date Legislation Fine/Penalty Costs Offence details Case Heard 1 MA Trade Centre Ltd 11/7/16 Road Traffic TOTAL £3,500 TOTAL Each defendant pleaded not guilty to four 36 Arthur Road Act 1988 £4,000 offences: one relating to the supply of a Ford Yardley Consumer (£1,750 each Fiesta motor vehicle from M A Trade Centre Ltd, Birmingham Protection defendant) (£2,000 36 Arthur Road, Yardley, Birmingham which was B25 8HA from Unfair each in an unroadworthy condition and three offences Trading (£1,000 x 1 RTA defendant) of falsely describing the vehicle in an advert on Mahmood Hussain Regulations offence the Auto Trader website. The advert falsely 59 Geraldine Road 2008 (£4,676 claimed that thousands of pounds had been spent Birmingham £250 x 3 CPUT requested) on the vehicle, that it had one previous owner and B25 8BE offences) that the vehicle had cruise control, automatic headlights, rain sensitive wipers, auto dimming rear view mirror and a spare wheel and tyre.

Found guilty after trial.

TRADING STANDARDS SIMPLE CAUTIONS During July 2016 no simple cautions were administered.

Page 135 of 152 17 APPENDIX 4

CASES FINALISED BY DISTRICT (PLACE OF OFFENCE) – JULY 2016 Edgbaston Erdington Hall Hodge Ladywood Northfield Perry Selly Sutton Yardley Out of Total Green Hill Barr Oak Coldfield Area

Licensing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Environmental 0 0 0 0 45 0 0 0 0 0 0 45 Health (FPNs) Not paid and prosecuted Environmental 0 2 0 1 4 0 0 0 1 2 0 10 Health (non FPNs) Trading 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 Standards

CASES FINALISED BY DISTRICT (DEFENDANT’S HOME ADDRESS/REGISTERED OFFICE) – JULY 2016 Edgbaston Erdington Hall Hodge Ladywood Northfield Perry Selly Sutton Yardley Out of Total Green Hill Barr Oak Coldfield Area

Licensing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Environmental 2 2 1 4 4 2 4 1 0 1 24 45 Health (FPNs) Not paid and prosecuted Environmental 0 2 1 1 4 0 0 0 0 1 1 10 Health (non FPNs) Trading 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 Standards

Page 136 of 152 18

CASES FINALISED BY DISTRICT (PLACE OF OFFENCE) – APRIL-JULY 2016 Edgbaston Erdington Hall Hodge Ladywood Northfield Perry Selly Sutton Yardley Out of Total Green Hill Barr Oak Coldfield Area

Licensing 1 1 2 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 10

Environmental 0 3 0 0 210 0 0 0 0 0 0 213 Health (FPNs) Not paid and prosecuted Environmental 0 4 3 4 7 3 3 6 1 3 0 34 Health (non FPNs) Trading 0 2 0 0 3 0 0 0 1 1 0 7 Standards

CASES FINALISED BY DISTRICT (DEFENDANT’S HOME ADDRESS/REGISTERED OFFICE) – APRIL-JULY 2016 Edgbaston Erdington Hall Hodge Ladywood Northfield Perry Selly Sutton Yardley Out of Total Green Hill Barr Oak Coldfield Area

Licensing 0 0 2 1 3 0 2 0 0 0 2 10

Environmental 14 17 14 15 18 12 7 3 3 6 104 213 Health (FPNs) Not paid and prosecuted Environmental 0 3 3 4 7 2 3 5 0 3 4 34 Health (non FPNs) Trading 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 3 7 Standards

Page 137 of 152 19

APPENDIX 5 WASTE ENFORCEMENT UNIT – ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITY APRIL 2016 – JULY 2016

Total Apr-16 May-16 Jun-16 Jul-16 2016/2017 Waste Investigation Outcomes

Investigations into commercial waste disposal suspected offences and offences 22 44 69 62 197 Section 34 Environmental Protection Act demand notices issued: (trade waste statutory information demands) 14 95 65 52 226 Section 34 Environmental Protection Act fixed penalty notices issued to businesses (£300) 7 2 15 34 58 Section 87 Environmental Protection Act . Fixed Penalty notices issued for commercial and residential litter offences (£80) 4 13 10 11 38 Prosecutions Number of prosecution files submitted to legal services (number produced quarterly) 11 11

Page 138 of 152 20 BIRMINGHAM CITY COUNCIL

REPORT OF THE ACTING DIRECTOR OF REGULATION AND ENFORCEMENT TO THE LICENSING AND PUBLIC PROTECTION COMMITTEE

19 OCTOBER 2016 ALL WARDS

OUTCOME OF APPEALS AGAINST SUB COMMITTEE DECISIONS: AUGUST 2016

1. Summary

1.1 This report advises the Committee of the outcomes of appeals against the Sub Committee’s decisions which are made to the Magistrates’ Court, and any subsequent appeals made to the Crown Court, and finalised in the period mentioned above.

2. Recommendation

2.1 That the report be noted.

Contact Officer: Chris Neville, Head of Licensing Telephone: 0121 303 6111 E-mail: [email protected]

Page 139 of 152

1 3. Summary of Appeal Hearings for August 2016

Magistrates’ Crown Total 4 1

Allowed 1 Dismis sed 3 1 Appeal lodged at Crown n/a Upheld in part Withdrawn pre -Court

4. Implications for Resources

4.1 The details of costs requested and ordered in each case are set out in the appendix below.

4.2 In August 2016 costs have been requested to the sum of £2319.60 with reimbursement of £2319.60 (100%) ordered by the Courts.

4.3 For the fiscal year thus far, April to August 2016, costs associated to appeal hearings have been requested to the sum of £10927.10 with reimbursement of £10215.10 (93.5%) ordered by the Courts.

5. Implications for Policy Priorities

5.1 The contents of this report contribute to the priority action of providing an efficient and effective Licensing service to ensure the comfort and safety of those using licensed premises and vehicles.

6. Public Sector Equality Duty

6.1 The actions identified in this report were taken in accordance with the Enforcement Policy of the Regulation and Enforcement Division, which ensures that equality issues have been addressed.

7. Consultation

7.1 The Enforcement Policy that underpins the work identified in this report is approved by your Committee. The policy reflects the views of the public and the business community in terms of the regulatory duties of the Council. Any enforcement action taken as a result of the contents of this report is subject to that Enforcement Policy.

ACTING DIRECTOR OF REGULATION AND ENFORCEMENT

Background Papers: Prosecution files and computer records in Legal Proceedings team.

Page 140 of 152

2 APPENDIX

MAGISTRATES’ COURT – PRIVATE HIRE DRIVER’S LICENCE

Date Case Costs Costs Name Result Comments Heard Requested Ordered On 31 May 2016, as the result of conviction for the offences of plying for hire and using a vehicle while uninsured, Committee considered and resolved in line Nil with the relevant policy to revoke the licence. The 1 Anthony Cave 19.08.2016 Allowed (contra Nil appeal was allowed because the Court was satisfied, BCC) on a balance of probabilities, that the Committee’s decision was wrong: the Court was not satisfied that Mr Cave is not a fit and proper person to hold a licence. The Court made no order for costs. On 2 March 2016, as the result of a complaint from an ambulance driver regarding inappropriate behaviour, 2 Zulfiqar Ali 01.08.2016 Dismissed £964.60 £964.60 Committee considered and resolved to suspend the licence for its duration and refuse its renewal for a total period of six months. On 31 May 2016, as the result of conviction for the offence of soliciting a person to obtain sexual services, 3 Taj Mohammed 09.08.2016 Dismissed £510.85 £510.85 Committee considered and resolved in line with the relevant policy to revoke the licence.

MAGISTRATES’ COURT – HACKNEY CARRIAGE DRIVER’S LICENCE

Date Case Costs Costs Name Result Comments Heard Requested Ordered On 8 June 2016, as the result of a complaint from a fare-paying passenger regarding inappropriate and abusive behaviour, Committee considered and 1 Mohammed Ali 12.08.2016 Dismissed £373.40 £373.40 resolved to refuse the renewal of the licence for a period of six months. Mr Ali has indicated an appeal to the Crown Court. Page 141 of 152

3 CROWN COURT – PRIVATE HIRE DRIVER’S LICENCE

Date Case Costs Costs Name Result Comments Heard Requested Ordered On 19 January 2016, as the result of conviction for the offences of plying for hire and using a vehicle while uninsured, Committee considered and in line with the 1 Paul Grindrod 26.08.2016 Dismissed £470.75 £470.75 relevant policy revoked the licence. The appeal to the Magistrates’ Court was dismissed on 23 May 2016 with costs of £350 being ordered.

Page 142 of 152

4 BIRMINGHAM CITY COUNCIL

REPORT OF THE ACTING DIRECTOR OF REGULATION AND ENFORCEMENT TO THE LICENSING AND PUBLIC PROTECTION COMMITTEE

19 OCTOBER 2016 ALL WARDS

FIXED PENALTY NOTICES ISSUED AUGUST 2016

1. Summary

1.1 The report sets out a breakdown, on a Constituency/Ward basis, of fixed penalty notices issued in the City during the period August 2016.

2. Recommendation

2.1 That the report be noted.

Contact Officer: Mark Croxford, Head of Environmental Health Telephone: 0121 303 6350 E-mail: [email protected]

Page 143 of 152 1

3. Background

3.1 The issuing of fixed penalty notices [FPN] by officers from Regulation and Enforcement is one of the means by which the problems of environmental degradation such as littering and dog fouling are being tackled within the City.

3.2 The yearly total numbers of fixed penalty notices issued are indicated below.

Month Fixed Penalty Notices Issued

April 2004 – Mar 2005 382 April 2005 – Mar 2006 209 April 2006 – Mar 2007 650 April 2007 – Mar 2008 682 April 2008 – Mar 2009 1,147 April 2009 – Mar 2010 1,043 April 2010 – Mar 2011 827 April 2011 – Mar 2012 2,053 April 2012 – Mar 2013 1,763 April 2013 – Mar 2014 1,984 April 2014 – Mar 2015 4,985 April 2015 – Mar 2016 5,855

4. Enforcement Considerations and Rationale

4.1 The attached appendices show on a ward and constituency basis where FPNs were issued during the month of August 2016.

4.2 By identifying both the area where the FPN is issued and the ward/area that the litterer lives this demonstrates that the anti-litter message is being spread right across the city. By and large litter patrols are targeted to the primary and secondary retail areas of the city because there is a high level of footfall and they engage with a full cross section of the population. Targeted areas include locations where there are excessive levels of littering, smoking areas with high levels of cigarette waste that cause blight in the city and areas where there are known problems associated with groups gathering to eat outdoors.

4.3 The number of incidences of Fixed Penalty Notices being issued reflects the fact that there is still a problem with littering on our streets. Since the Health Act came into force there has been a decline in street cleanliness associated with cigarette waste. This is reflected not only in these statistics but also in the environmental quality surveys undertaken by Fleet and Waste Management that record cigarette waste being the most prevalent waste upon our streets and identify it in 98% of all samples of street cleanliness.

4.4 One of the difficulties in resolving the problem of cigarette waste being deposited on the street is that the perception of many smokers is that

Page 144 of 152 2

cigarette waste is not litter. A change in the culture and perceptions of these smokers is critical to resolving this problem.

4.5 Anyone who receives a FPN is encouraged to talk to their co-workers, friends and families to promote the anti-litter message.

5. Consultation

5.1 The Enforcement Policy that underpins the work identified in this report is approved by your Committee. The policy reflects the views of the public and the business community in terms of the regulatory duties of the Council. Any enforcement action[s] taken as a result of the contents of this report are subject to that Enforcement Policy.

6. Implications for Resources

6.1 The work identified in this report was undertaken within the resources available to your Committee.

7. Implications for Policy Priorities

7.1 The issue of fixed penalty notices has a direct impact on environmental degradation within the City and the Council’s strategic outcome of staying safe in a clean, green city.

8. Public Sector Equality Duty

8.1 The actions identified in this report were taken in accordance with approved enforcement policies which ensure that equalities issues have been addressed.

ACTING DIRECTOR OF REGULATION AND ENFORCEMENT

Background Papers: FPN records

Page 145 of 152 3

Page 146 of 152 BIRMINGHAM CITY COUNCIL

REPORT OF THE ACTING DIRECTOR OF REGULATION AND ENFORCEMENT TO THE LICENSING AND PUBLIC PROTECTION COMMITTEE

19 OCTOBER 2016 ALL WARDS

FIXED PENALTY NOTICES ISSUED AUGUST 2016

1. Summary

1.1 The report sets out a breakdown, on a Constituency/Ward basis, of fixed penalty notices issued in the City during the period August 2016.

2. Recommendation

2.1 That the report be noted.

Contact Officer: Mark Croxford, Head of Environmental Health Telephone: 0121 303 6350 E-mail: [email protected]

Page 147 of 152 1

3. Background

3.2 The yearly total numbers of fixed penalty notices issued are indicated below.

Month Fixed Penalty Notices Issued

4. Enforcement Considerations and Rationale

4.1 The attached appendices show on a ward and constituency basis where FPNs were issued during the month of August 2016.

4.4 One of the difficulties in resolving the problem of cigarette waste being deposited on the street is that the perception of many smokers is that

Page 148 of 152 2

cigarette waste is not litter. A change in the culture and perceptions of these smokers is critical to resolving this problem.

4.5 Anyone who receives a FPN is encouraged to talk to their co-workers, friends and families to promote the anti-litter message.

5. Consultation

6. Implications for Resources

6.1 The work identified in this report was undertaken within the resources available to your Committee.

7. Implications for Policy Priorities

7.1 The issue of fixed penalty notices has a direct impact on environmental degradation within the City and the Council’s strategic outcome of staying safe in a clean, green city.

8. Public Sector Equality Duty

8.1 The actions identified in this report were taken in accordance with approved enforcement policies which ensure that equalities issues have been addressed.

ACTING DIRECTOR OF REGULATION AND ENFORCEMENT

Background Papers: FPN records

Page 149 of 152 3

Page 150 of 152

BIRMINGHAM CITY COUNCIL

LICENSING AND PUBLIC PROTECTION COMMITTEE

14 September 2016

SCHEDULE OF OUTSTANDING MINUTES

MINUTE SUBJECT MATTER COMMENTS NO./DATE

365(ii) Committee Policy – Service Director of Regulation and Report for October 25/06/2014 Enforcement to review the policy in respect of the engine 2016 size and age of private hire vehicles and report to Committee.

599 (ii) Implications of the Casey Report for Licensing – That See agenda item No. 20/01/2016 the action plan for CSE be submitted to committee once it 8 had been updated.

603 Cost awarded in Legal Proceedings – Service Director Report for October 20/01/2016 of Regulation and Enforcement be requested to report on 2016 the percentage of the costs received against those awarded in legal proceedings

614 (iii) Shisha Lounges - That a further report detailing potential Report for October 17/02/2016 harm reduction strategies is brought to Committee by 2016 June 2016.

618 (ii) Licensing Authority Delegations Hackney Carriage See agenda item No. 17/02/2016 And Private Hire - Officers be instructed to draft a Code 5 of Conduct for Members of the Licensing and Public Protection Committee, to be brought to a future Licensing and Public Protection Committee for agreement with a view to being presented to the Council Business Management Committee for inclusion in the constitution.

620 (iv) Policy on Sexual Entertainment Venues - That a One further meeting 17/02/2016 Working Party be set up to look at the Council’s Sexual to be undertaken Entertainment Venues (SEV) policy.

633 Animal Welfare Post – Action to be undertaken by Acting Director of 16/03/2016 officers to identify alternatives to the deletion of a post in Regulation and the Animal Welfare Team and find money within the Enforcement to budget for this post to continue. advise on the current situation.

640 (i) Preparedness for Sports Grounds Report for October 16/03/2016 2016 That officers, in conjunctionPage with151 Alistairof 152 Campbell, Head - 1 - of Emergency Planning, provide a report on this for Committee.

640 (ii) Travellers – Report to be submitted to Committee Report for October 16/03/2016 2016

648 Conditions of Licence for Private Hire Operators, Report for October 20/04/2016 Drivers and Vehicles – A comprehensive report on this 2016 to be submitted to Committee

651 (ii) Proposals for Vehicle Emission Standards for Report for October 20/04/2016 Hackney Carriage and Private Hire Vehicles – 2016

That officers be instructed to produce a draft policy for a future meeting based on the outcome of the Committee’s deliberations.

651 (iii) Proposals for Vehicle Emission Standards for Report for October 20/04/2016 Hackney Carriage and Private Hire Vehicles – 2016

That officers engage with the neighbouring West Midlands Licensing Authorities to discuss proposals for a regional emissions standard for hackney carriages and private hire vehicles.

Page 152 of 152 - 2 -