DOCSLIB.ORG

021303Orig1s005

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
021303Orig1s005 CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH Approval Package for: APPLICATION NUMBER: 021303Orig1s005 Trade Name: ADDERALL XR Generic or Proper Dextroamphetamine Saccharate , Amphetamine Name: Aspartate Monohydrate Dextroamphetamine Sulfate Amphetamine Sulfate Sponsor: Shire Approval Date: 08/11/2004 Indication: ADDERALL XR™ is indicated for the treatment of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH 021303Orig1s005 CONTENTS Reviews / Information Included in this NDA Review. Approval Letter X Other Action Letters X Labeling X REMS Summary Review X Officer/Employee List Office Director Memo Cross Discipline Team Leader Review Medical Review(s) X Chemistry Review(s) X Environmental Assessment Pharmacology Review(s) Statistical Review(s) X Microbiology / Virology Review(s) Clinical Pharmacology/Biopharmaceutics Review(s) X Other Reviews X Risk Assessment and Risk Mitigation Review(s) Proprietary Name Review(s) Administrative/Correspondence Document(s) X CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH APPLICATION NUMBER: 021303Orig1s005 APPROVAL LETTER NDA 21-303/S-005 Page 2 69009) and was effective June 8, 2004. For additional information, consult the following guidance for industry: Regulatory Submissions in Electronic Format – Content of Labeling (February 2004). Pediatric Research Equity Act (PREA) All applications for new active ingredients, new dosage forms, new indications, new routes of administration, and new dosing regimens are required to contain an assessment of the safety and effectiveness of the product in pediatric patients unless this requirement is waived or deferred. We are waiving the pediatric study requirement for ages less than 6 years and deferring pediatric studies for ages 13 to 17 years for this application. Your deferred pediatric studies required under section 2 of the Pediatric Research Equity Act (PREA) are considered required postmarketing study commitments. The status of these postmarketing studies shall be reported annually according to 21 CFR 314.81. These commitments are listed below. LIST POSTMARKETING COMMITMENTS: 1. Deferred pediatric study under PREA for the treatment of ADHD in pediatric patients ages 13 to 17. Final Report Submission: May 2008 Submit final study reports to this NDA. For administrative purposes, all submissions related to this/these pediatric postmarketing study commitments must be clearly designated “Required Pediatric Study Commitments”. Promotional Materials In addition, submit three copies of the introductory promotional materials that you propose to use for this product. Submit all proposed materials in draft or mock-up form, not final print. Send one copy to this division/ the Division of Neuropharmacological Drug Products and two copies of both the promotional materials and the package insert directly to: Division of Drug Marketing, Advertising, and Communications, HFD-42 Food and Drug Administration 5600 Fishers Lane Rockville, MD 20857 Medwatch If you issue a letter communicating important information about this drug product (i.e., a “Dear Health Care Professional” letter), we request that you submit a copy of the letter to this NDA and a copy to the following address: MEDWATCH, HFD-410 FDA 5600 Fishers Lane Rockville, MD 20857 We remind you that you must comply with reporting requirements for an approved NDA (21 CFR 314.80 and 314.81). NDA 21-303/S-005 Page 3 If you have any questions, call Richardae Taylor, Pharm.D., Regulatory Project Manager, at (301) 594- 5793. Sincerely, {See appended electronic signature page} Russell Katz, M.D. Director Division of Neuropharmacological Drug Products Office of Drug Evaluation I Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Enclosure --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed electronically and this page is the manifestation of the electronic signature. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- /s/ --------------------- Russell Katz 8/11/04 10:58:28 AM CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH APPLICATION NUMBER: 021303Orig1s005 OTHER ACTION LETTERS (b) (4) 2. We were unable to find any analyses of ECG abnormalities and changes from baseline to endpoint by dose group in Study 303. Please provide this along with a summary of your findings. In addition, we note that you have detected a slight increase in the mean QTc interval in patients treated with Adderall XR compared to placebo in Study 303. However, we have not been able to determine the method of correction you used to calculate the QTc interval. Please present the method you performed and the rationale for this particular choice. 3. We were not able to clearly establish the extent of exposure of Adderall XR in the studies in the adult population. Your Table 4, Extent of Exposure in Multiple Dose Studies, implies that only 60 patients received Adderall XR for 6-months or greater at any dose and that only 19 patients received 60-mg for a period of 6-months or greater. Please confirm whether or not this is correct. Based on discussions with you, we had anticipated that you would present data on a much larger group of adults (about 200 patients treated for at least 6 months). If we are correct in our calculations of the number of patients who received treatment for 6 months or longer, you will need to accrue considerably more long-term, prospective, well-monitored safety experience prior to approval. 4. As part of the review of the NDA supplement, the FDA's Adverse Event Reporting System was searched for adverse events reported in association with Adderall products. Among these adverse events were a number of serious events including myocardial infarctions, cerebrovascular accidents, sudden deaths, and non-fatal cardiac arrhythmias. Of particular concern to us is the fact that a number of these events occurred in relatively young adults who appeared to have no other explanation for their event. While it is not possible to assign drug causality in individual cases, one way to assess potential safety signals is to calculate reporting rates for each of the adverse events of interest and compare them to the pertinent background rates. We request that you calculate reporting rates (number of cases/person-time exposure) for the following adverse events and compare these rates to the pertinent background rates. o Sudden death o Myocardial infarction o Cerebrovascular accidents/transient ischemic attacks o Non-fatal ventricular arrhythmia o Cardiomyopathy o Seizure o Ischemic organ damage 5. Because many of the events are occurring in a relatively young population (20's-40's), it is crucial that the reporting rates be stratified into the pertinent age strata. The reporting rates should then be compared to background rates that are stratified by age. Background rates for these events may be available in the medical literature. Alternatively, there may be some events for which a background rate may be estimated from a data source such as the National Hospital Discharge Survey. 2 Under 21 CFR 314.102(d) of the new drug regulations, you may request an informal meeting or telephone conference with this division to discuss what further steps need to be taken before the application may be approved. This product may be considered to be misbranded under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act if it is marketed with these changes prior to approval of this supplemental application. If you should have any questions, please call Ms. Richardae Taylor, Pharm D, Regulatory Management Officer, at (301) 594-5793. Sincerely, {See appended electronic signature page} Russell Katz, M.D. Director Division of Neuropharmacological Drug Products Office of Drug Evaluation I Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Attachment 11 Pages of Draft Labeling have been Withheld in Full as b4 (CCI/TS) immediately following this page. 5 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed electronically and this page is the manifestation of the electronic signature. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- /s/ --------------------- Russell Katz 10/17/03 01:39:30 PM CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH APPLICATION NUMBER: 021303Orig1s005 LABELING ADDERALL XR CAPSULES CII Rx Only AMPHETAMINES HAVE A HIGH POTENTIAL FOR ABUSE. ADMINISTRATION OF AMPHETAMINES FOR PROLONGED PERIODS OF TIME MAY LEAD TO DRUG DEPENDENCE. PARTICULAR ATTENTION SHOULD BE PAID TO THE POSSIBILITY OF SUBJECTS OBTAINING AMPHETAMINES FOR NON-THERAPEUTIC USE OR DISTRIBUTION TO OTHERS AND THE DRUGS SHOULD BE PRESCRIBED OR DISPENSED SPARINGLY. MISUSE OF AMPHETAMINE MAY CAUSE SUDDEN DEATH AND SERIOUS CARDIOVASCULAR ADVERSE EVENTS. DESCRIPTION ADDERALL XR™ is a once daily extended-release, single-entity amphetamine product. ADDERALL XR™ combines the neutral sulfate salts of dextroamphetamine and amphetamine, with the dextro isomer of amphetamine saccharate and d,l-amphetamine aspartate monohydrate. The ADDERALL XR™ capsule contains two types of drug-containing beads designed to give a double-pulsed delivery of amphetamines, which prolongs the release of amphetamine from ADDERALL XR™ compared to the conventional ADDERALL® (immediate- release) tablet formulation. EACH CAPSULE CONTAINS: 5 mg 10 mg 15 mg 20 mg
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Educational Commentary – Testing for Amphetamines and Related Compounds
    EDUCATIONAL COMMENTARY – TESTING FOR AMPHETAMINES AND RELATED COMPOUNDS Learning Outcomes Upon completion of this exercise, participants will be able to: • list amphetamine-like compounds that may be detected by immunoassay screening tests for amphetamines. • describe the 3 types of amphetamine immunoassays based on their antibody specificity. • discuss common causes of false-positive results when testing for amphetamines. Correct interpretation of testing results for amphetamines and related compounds is dependent on many factors including an understanding of the nomenclature, structure, and metabolism of these compounds. The class of phenethylamine compounds having varying degrees of sympathomimetic activity include amphetamine, methamphetamine, and many other compounds known by several names including amphetamines (as a group), designer drugs often grouped together as ecstasy [3,4- methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA); 3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA), and 3,4- methylenedioxy-N-ethylamphetamine (MDEA)], and sympathomimetic amines including ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, and phenylpropanolamine found in over-the-counter (OTC) medications. Amphetamine, a primary amine, and methamphetamine, a secondary amine, have a stereogenic center and have enantiomers or optical isomers designated d (or +) for dextrorotatory and l (or -) for levorotatory. In general, the d isomers are the more physiologically active compounds, but pharmaceutical preparations may consist of either isomer or a mixture of both isomers. When the mixture contains equal concentrations of the 2 enantiomers, it is known as a racemic mixture. The existence of enantiomers for amphetamines creates analytical and interpretative problems. Immunoassay Screening The primary screening methods for detecting amphetamines are immunoassays. The structural similarity to amphetamine or methamphetamine of the compounds previously mentioned makes it difficult to produce antibodies specific for amphetamine, methamphetamine, or both.
    [Show full text]
  • KHAT Latest Revision: June 11, 2005
    KHAT Latest Revision: June 11, 2005 O CH3 NH2 Cathinone OH CH3 NH2 Cathine N CH3 H3C N 3,6-dimethyl-2,5-diphenylpyrazine (dimer of Cathinone) 1. SYNONYMS CFR: Cathinone Cathine CAS #: Cathinone Hydrochloride: 71031-15-7 Cathine Hydrochloride: 2153-98-2 Cathine Base: 492-39-7 Other Names: Catha edulis Kat Mutsawhari Mutsawari Mdimamadzi Musitate Mirungi Miraa Ol meraa Tumayot Liruti Ikwa Arabian Tea 2. CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL DATA Khat is used as a stimulant or as a medicine in parts of Africa and the Arabian Peninsula. The plant is thought to have been in cultivation before the coffee plant; historical references date the use of the plant to the fourteenth century. Peter Forsskal, a physician and botanist, collected khat specimens in an expedition organized by the King of Denmark in the eighteenth century. Forsskal assigned the name Catha edulis to the plant. The effects produced by the drug include excitation, hypersensitivity, anorexia, insomnia, euphoria, increased respiration, and hyperthermia. These effects closely parallel the effects of d-amphetamine. Khat is a bush or tree that grows naturally in the humid mountainous regions (elevations of 5000 to 6500 feet) of East and South Africa. The trees can grow naturally to over 60 ft; however, cultivated khat trees are pruned and their height to kept to approximately 16 feet. Khat also grows to a height of 3 feet as a small bush in arid regions. Like opium, the alkaloid content of khat will vary with the soil, climatic conditions, and cultivation. Khat belongs to the genus Catha edulis. It is recognized that the genus consists of only one species; however, the plant exhibits extreme polymorphism.
    [Show full text]
  • Preparation of Amphetamines From
    Europäisches Patentamt *EP001442006B1* (19) European Patent Office Office européen des brevets (11) EP 1 442 006 B1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT SPECIFICATION (45) Date of publication and mention (51) Int Cl.7: C07C 209/00 of the grant of the patent: 24.08.2005 Bulletin 2005/34 (86) International application number: PCT/US2002/034400 (21) Application number: 02802245.7 (87) International publication number: (22) Date of filing: 28.10.2002 WO 2003/037843 (08.05.2003 Gazette 2003/19) (54) PREPARATION OF AMPHETAMINES FROM PHENYLPROPANOLAMINES VERFAHREN ZUR HERSTELLUNG VON AMPHETAMINEN AUS PHENYLPROPANOLAMINEN PREPARATION D’AMPHETAMINES A PARTIR DE PHENYLPROPANOLAMINES (84) Designated Contracting States: • REINER LUCKENBACH: "Beilstein Handbuch AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR der Organischen Chemie, vol. XII, 4th Ed., 4th IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE SK TR Suppl., p. 2586 to 2591" 1984 , SPRINGER VERLAG , BERLIN . HEIDELBERG . NEW YORK (30) Priority: 29.10.2001 US 20488 TOKYO XP002235852 page 2586 -page 2591 • HANS-G. BOIT: "Beilsteins Handbuch der (43) Date of publication of application: Organischen Chemie, vol. XII, 4th Ed., Third 04.08.2004 Bulletin 2004/32 Suppl. page 2664 to page 2669" 1973 , SPRINGER VERLAG , BERLIN . HEIDELBERG . (73) Proprietor: Boehringer Ingelheim Chemicals, Inc. NEW YORK XP002235853 page 2664 -page 2669 Peterburg, VA 23805 (US) • DATABASE CROSSFIRE BEILSTEIN [Online] BEILSTEIN INSTITUT ZUR FOEDERUNG DER (72) Inventors: CHEMISCHEN WISSENSCHAFTEN, • BOSWELL, Robert F., FRANKFURT AM MAIN, DE; Boehringer Ingelheim Chem.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmacology and Toxicology of Amphetamine and Related Designer Drugs
    Pharmacology and Toxicology of Amphetamine and Related Designer Drugs U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES • Public Health Service • Alcohol Drug Abuse and Mental Health Administration Pharmacology and Toxicology of Amphetamine and Related Designer Drugs Editors: Khursheed Asghar, Ph.D. Division of Preclinical Research National Institute on Drug Abuse Errol De Souza, Ph.D. Addiction Research Center National Institute on Drug Abuse NIDA Research Monograph 94 1989 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Administration National Institute on Drug Abuse 5600 Fishers Lane Rockville, MD 20857 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, DC 20402 Pharmacology and Toxicology of Amphetamine and Related Designer Drugs ACKNOWLEDGMENT This monograph is based upon papers and discussion from a technical review on pharmacology and toxicology of amphetamine and related designer drugs that took place on August 2 through 4, 1988, in Bethesda, MD. The review meeting was sponsored by the Biomedical Branch, Division of Preclinical Research, and the Addiction Research Center, National Institute on Drug Abuse. COPYRIGHT STATUS The National Institute on Drug Abuse has obtained permission from the copyright holders to reproduce certain previously published material as noted in the text. Further reproduction of this copyrighted material is permitted only as part of a reprinting of the entire publication or chapter. For any other use, the copyright holder’s permission is required. All other matieral in this volume except quoted passages from copyrighted sources is in the public domain and may be used or reproduced without permission from the Institute or the authors.
    [Show full text]
  • MRO Manual Before 2004
    Note: This manual is essentially the same as the 1997 HHS Medical Review Officer (MRO) Manual except for changes related to the new Federal Custody and Control Form (CCF). The appendix has also been deleted since the new Federal Custody and Control Form is available as a separate file on the website. Medical Review Officer Manual for Federal Agency Workplace Drug Testing Programs for use with the new Federal Drug Testing Custody and Control Form (OMB Number 0930-0158, Exp Date: June 30, 2003) This manual applies to federal agency drug testing programs that come under Executive Order 12564 and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Mandatory Guidelines. Table of Contents Chapter 1. The Medical Review Officer (MRO) ............................................................... 1 Chapter 2. Federal Drug Testing Custody and Control Form .......................................... 3 Chapter 3. The MRO Review Process ............................................................................ 3 A. Administrative Review of the CCF ........................................................................... 3 I. State Initiatives and Laws ....................................................................................... 15 Chapter 4. Specific Drug Class Issues .......................................................................... 15 A. Amphetamines ....................................................................................................... 15 B. Cocaine ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of the Feasibility of Oral Controlled Release in an Exploratory
    DDT • Volume 10, Number 17 • September 2005 REVIEWS Assessment of the feasibility of oral controlled release in an exploratory TODAY DRUG DISCOVERY development setting Reviews • Avinash G.Thombre Controlled release (CR) formulations have generally been considered as follow-ons to conventional immediate release formulations to manage the life cycle of a product. Although significant opportunities exist to use CR as an enabling technology for certain exploratory drug candidates, they have not been fully exploited. However, progress made in assessing CR feasibility based on the physicochemical and biopharmaceutical properties of the drug, together with advances made in understanding the various CR technologies and developing formulations in a fast and efficient manner, have increasingly made it possible to consider CR in an exploratory development setting. Only a few years ago, controlled release (CR) was formulations. First, the market expects once-daily usually restricted to managing product life cycle, dosing, so compounds with a short half-life, which enhancing the proprietary position of marketed require more-frequent dosing, might not be attractive drugs and expanding and consolidating a product to develop. Second, CR can sometimes minimize the franchise. CR technologies were mostly licensed undesirable side-effects related to high and rapidly from small specialized drug-delivery companies. increasing peak plasma levels. In product enhance- Although large pharmaceutical companies main- ment, improved product safety and efficacy, and the tained internal CR formulation development (pri- resulting expansion of market position are primary marily as backup), the focus was on developing the drivers. In ED, CR formulations could represent an next generation of new chemical entities (NCEs).
    [Show full text]
  • Are Prescription Stimulants “Smart Pills”?
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Neuroethics Publications Center for Neuroscience & Society 9-2011 Are Prescription Stimulants “Smart Pills”? M. Elizabeth Smith University of Pennsylvania Martha J. Farah University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/neuroethics_pubs Part of the Bioethics and Medical Ethics Commons, Neuroscience and Neurobiology Commons, Neurosciences Commons, and the Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Smith, M., & Farah, M. J. (2011). Are Prescription Stimulants “Smart Pills”?. Psychological Bullentin, 137 (5), 717-741. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0023825 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/neuroethics_pubs/96 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Are Prescription Stimulants “Smart Pills”? Abstract Use of prescription stimulants by normal healthy individuals to enhance cognition is said to be on the rise. Who is using these medications for cognitive enhancement, and how prevalent is this practice? Do prescription stimulants in fact enhance cognition for normal healthy people? We review the epidemiological and cognitive neuroscience literatures in search of answers to these questions. Epidemiological issues addressed include the prevalence of nonmedical stimulant use, user demographics, methods by which users obtain prescription stimulants, and motivations for use. Cognitive neuroscience issues addressed include the effects of prescription stimulants on learning and executive function, as well as the task and individual variables associated with these effects. Little is known about the prevalence of prescription stimulant use for cognitive enhancement outside of student populations. Among college students, estimates of use vary widely but, taken together, suggest that the practice is commonplace.
    [Show full text]
  • PROIN 25- Phenylpropanolamine Hydrochloride Tablet, Chewable Pegasus Laboratories, Inc
    PROIN 25- phenylpropanolamine hydrochloride tablet, chewable Pegasus Laboratories, Inc. ---------- For oral use in dogs only Caution: Federal law restricts this drug to use by or on the order of a licensed veterinarian. Description: Description: PROIN (phenylpropanolamine hydrochloride) is a sympathomimetic amine closely related to ephedrine. Phenylpropanolamine hydrochloride (PPA) is the nonproprietary designation for benzenemethanol,α - (1-aminoethyl) - hydrochloride, (R*,S*) - , (± ). The empirical formula is C9H13NO• HCl and the molecular weight is 187.67. It is a white crystalline compound having a slight aromatic odor. PPA is freely soluble in water and alcohol but is practically insoluble in ether, benzene and chloroform. The chemical structure of phenylpropanolamine hydrochloride is: Indication: PROIN is indicated for the control of urinary incontinence due to urethral sphincter hypotonus in dogs. Dosage and Administration: The total recommended dosage for oral administration is 2 mg/kg (0.91 mg/lb) of body weight twice daily. PROIN is scored and dosage should be calculated in half-tablet increments. Warnings: Not for human use. Keep out of reach of children. Consult a physician in case of accidental ingestion by humans. Precautions: PROIN may cause increased thirst; therefore, provide ample fresh water. Overdose has been associated with dogs chewing through closed bottles of PROIN and consuming multiple tablets. Therefore, it is important to store PROIN Chewable Tablets out of reach of dogs and other pets in a secured location. Use in dogs with incontinence due to a urinary tract infection will mask symptoms. PROIN is not effective in dogs with incontinence due to neurologic disease or malformations. PROIN may cause hypertension; therefore, use with caution in dogs with pre-existing heart disease, hypertension, liver disease, kidney insufficiency, diabetes, glaucoma, and conditions with a predilection for hypertension.
    [Show full text]
  • Recommended Methods for the Identification and Analysis Of
    Vienna International Centre, P.O. Box 500, 1400 Vienna, Austria Tel: (+43-1) 26060-0, Fax: (+43-1) 26060-5866, www.unodc.org RECOMMENDED METHODS FOR THE IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF AMPHETAMINE, METHAMPHETAMINE AND THEIR RING-SUBSTITUTED ANALOGUES IN SEIZED MATERIALS (revised and updated) MANUAL FOR USE BY NATIONAL DRUG TESTING LABORATORIES Laboratory and Scientific Section United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime Vienna RECOMMENDED METHODS FOR THE IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF AMPHETAMINE, METHAMPHETAMINE AND THEIR RING-SUBSTITUTED ANALOGUES IN SEIZED MATERIALS (revised and updated) MANUAL FOR USE BY NATIONAL DRUG TESTING LABORATORIES UNITED NATIONS New York, 2006 Note Mention of company names and commercial products does not imply the endorse- ment of the United Nations. This publication has not been formally edited. ST/NAR/34 UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION Sales No. E.06.XI.1 ISBN 92-1-148208-9 Acknowledgements UNODC’s Laboratory and Scientific Section wishes to express its thanks to the experts who participated in the Consultative Meeting on “The Review of Methods for the Identification and Analysis of Amphetamine-type Stimulants (ATS) and Their Ring-substituted Analogues in Seized Material” for their contribution to the contents of this manual. Ms. Rosa Alis Rodríguez, Laboratorio de Drogas y Sanidad de Baleares, Palma de Mallorca, Spain Dr. Hans Bergkvist, SKL—National Laboratory of Forensic Science, Linköping, Sweden Ms. Warank Boonchuay, Division of Narcotics Analysis, Department of Medical Sciences, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand Dr. Rainer Dahlenburg, Bundeskriminalamt/KT34, Wiesbaden, Germany Mr. Adrian V. Kemmenoe, The Forensic Science Service, Birmingham Laboratory, Birmingham, United Kingdom Dr. Tohru Kishi, National Research Institute of Police Science, Chiba, Japan Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Methamphetamine and Other Potentially Risky Sex-Enhancing Drugs
    METHAMPHETAMINE AND OTHER POTENTIALLY RISKY SEX-ENHANCING DRUGS A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CLINICAL SEXOLOGISTS AT MAIMONIDES UNIVERSITY IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BY DAVID MICHAEL FAWCETT ALFREDO EUGENIO TAULE' NORTH MIAMI BEACH, FLORIDA DECEMBER, 2004 DISSERTATION APPROVAL This dissertation submitted by David Michael Fawcett and Alfredo Eugenio Taule' has been read and approved by three faculty members of the American Academy of Clinical Sexologists at Maimonides University. The final copies have been examined by the Dissertation Committee and the signatures which appear here verify the fact that any necessary changes have been incorporated and the dissertation is now given the final approval with reference to content, form and mechanical accuracy. The dissertation is therefore accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Signature Date ______________________________ ______________ William Granzig, Ph.D., FAACS Advisor and Committee Chair ______________________________ _______________ John Achinapura, Ph.D. Committee Member ______________________________ _______________ James Walker, Ph.D. Committee Member ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I dedicate this dissertation to my first born son Timothy who at the age of thirty-four after the terrorist attack in New York and Washington became a part of our proud military forces. At present he is a proud Airborne Ranger protecting our nation in a dangerous forward zone in the Sunni Triangle in Iraq. Timothy's resolve and courage as well as all of his accomplishments in such a short period of time have become a great source of inspiration for our family. My son has become my hero and he has made me aware of noble feelings like honor, loyalty, patriotism and commitment.
    [Show full text]
  • Total Force Fitness for Endurance Events
    TOTAL FORCE FITNESS FOR ENDURANCE EVENTS 30 October 2019 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 3 SECTION 1 : TRAINING 4 CHAPTER 1: THE SUPPORT YOU NEED TO CROSS THE FINISH LINE 5 CHAPTER 2: STRESS-FRACTURE PREVENTION: ENDURANCE-TRAINING EDITION 7 CHAPTER 3: HEAT-ILLNESS PREVENTION 8 CHAPTER 4: WHEN “RUBBING DIRT IN IT” ISN’T THE ANSWER 9 CHAPTER 5: EVERYDAY PERFORMANCE NUTRITION 11 CHAPTER 6: ENDURANCE-TRAINING WORKOUT PLANNING 16 WORKSHEET: TRAINING GOALS PLANNER 17 WORKSHEET: CARDIO PLANNER 19 WORKSHEET: WEIGHT-TRAINING PLANNER 21 CHAPTER 7: IMAGINE YOUR WAY TO BETTER PERFORMANCE 22 WORKSHEET: BUILD AN IMAGERY SCRIPT 23 CHAPTER 8: TRAINING NUTRITION 28 CHAPTER 9: THE RUNNER’S CORNER 33 SECTION 2: EVENT 37 CHAPTER 10: CHECKLIST FOR ENDURANCE ATHLETES 38 CHAPTER 11: CHECKLIST FOR FAMILY AND FRIENDS OF ATHLETES 40 CHAPTER 12: OPTIMIZE PERFORMANCE THROUGH POSITIVE SELF-TALK 42 CHAPTER 13: GOT ANXIETY? GET EXCITED INSTEAD! 44 CHAPTER 14: PRE-EVENT AND EVENT-DAY NUTRITION STRATEGIES 45 SECTION 3: RECOVERY 47 CHAPTER 15: FINISH STRONG: RECOVERY NUTRITION 48 CHAPTER 16: ACTIVE AND PASSIVE RECOVERY 49 CHAPTER 17: ENDURANCE EVENT AFTER-ACTION REVIEW (AAR) 52 2 TOTAL FORCE FITNESS FOR ENDURANCE EVENTS INTRODUCTION Optimal performance requires more than just physical prowess. Many other factors play a role in your endurance performance. This Human Performance Resources by CHAMP Total Force Fitness for Endurance Events guide contains hundreds of evidence-based tips to help you maximize your training and recov- ery for peak performance on race day. It brings the concept of Total Force Fitness for Military Service Members to the arena of athletic endurance.
    [Show full text]
  • Concepts and Opinions About the Use of Stimulant Medications
    Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 50:1-2 (2009), pp 180–193 doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.02062.x Psychopharmacology: concepts and opinions about the use of stimulant medications James M. Swanson and Nora D. Volkow This ‘perspective piece’ on the topic of psychophar- Many reviews have been published to summarize macology was requested to be opinion-driven and the plethora of studies that followed, including conceptual in nature, rather than a systematic influential early reviews in this journal (see Barkley, review or a state-of-the-science article. Recently we 1977) and from the European perspective by Taylor (Volkow & Swanson, 2008a) adopted a broad (1979) and in this journal by Bramble (2003). All approach to address multiple classes of psychotropic seem to reach about the same basic conclusions medication used to treat children (stimulants, anti- about the effects of AMP and MPH that were reported depressants, and anti-psychotics). We provided in these initial studies. Fifteen years ago these were examples from traditional clinical pharmacology to summarized by Swanson et al. (1993) in a ‘review of discuss their pharamacokinetic (PK) and pharma- reviews’ that suggested what should be expected codynamic (PD) properties, as well as examples from (e.g., short-term reduction in symptoms of ADHD modern positron emission tomography (PET) brain and associated features of opposition and aggres- imaging to characterize the time course of drug sion) and what should not be expected (long-term effects at the primary cellular sites of action in the benefits, absence of side effects, paradoxical re- brain (transporters, enzymes, and receptors).
    [Show full text]