Taxonomy and Biogeography of New World Quail

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Taxonomy and Biogeography of New World Quail National Quail Symposium Proceedings Volume 3 Article 2 1993 Taxonomy and Biogeography of New World Quail R. J. Gutierrez Humboldt State University Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/nqsp Recommended Citation Gutierrez, R. J. (1993) "Taxonomy and Biogeography of New World Quail," National Quail Symposium Proceedings: Vol. 3 , Article 2. Available at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/nqsp/vol3/iss1/2 This General is brought to you for free and open access by Volunteer, Open Access, Library Journals (VOL Journals), published in partnership with The University of Tennessee (UT) University Libraries. This article has been accepted for inclusion in National Quail Symposium Proceedings by an authorized editor. For more information, please visit https://trace.tennessee.edu/nqsp. Gutierrez: Taxonomy and Biogeography of New World Quail TAXONOMYAND BIOGEOGRAPHYOFNEW WORLD QUAIL R. J. GUTIERREZ,Department of Wildlife, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA 95521 Abstract: New World quail are a distinct genetic lineage within the avian order Galliformes. The most recent taxonomic treatment classifies the group as a separate family, Odontophoridae, within the order. Approximately 31 species and 128-145 subspecies are recognized from North and South America. Considerable geographic variation occurs within some species which leads to ambiguity when describing species limits. A thorough analysis of the Galliformes is needed to clarify the phylogenetic relationships of these quail. It is apparent that geologic or climatic isolating events led to speciation within New World quail. Their current distribution suggests that dispersal followed speciation. Because the genetic variation found in this group may reflect local adaption, the effect of translocation and stocking of pen-reared quail on local population genetic structure must be critically examined. Key words: biogeography, New World quail, Odontophoridae, taxonomy. Citation: Gutierrez, R. J. 1993. Taxonomy and biogeography of New World quail. Pages 8-15 in K. E. Church and T. V. Dailey, eds. Quail III: national quail symposium. Kansas Dep. Wildl. and Parks, Pratt. The New World quail are a diverse and inter­ esting group within the avian order Galliforrnes. They are distributed from Canada south to South America (Fig. l; Johnsgard 1988). The more com­ mon North American species have received much attention from ecologists because they are impor­ tant game birds (e.g., Rosene 1969, Johnsgard 1973, Leopold 1977, Scott 1985). Taxonomists also have focused on these quail because they are relatively easy to collect, and probably because of their culinary appeal. That is, early bird collectors and ornithologists often collected quail not only Number of Species because of their scientific value but also because ~ 1 of their fine taste. These collections provided ex­ tensive comparative material for taxonomists !l1! 2 working in museums (e.g., see Table 1 for a partial r--------------· mm3 I list of galliforrn taxonomic treatments). ,I Despite widespread interest in New World .4 quail, the systematics of this group are still in debate (e.g., Mayr and Short 1970, AOU 1983, Sibley and Ahlquist 1990). This dynamic state is due, in part, to recent advances in systematic techniques (e.g., Gutierrez et al. 1983, Sibley and Ahlquist 1990) as well as to debate over the species concept (Mayr and Short 1970, McKitrick and Zink 1988). Major advances in molecular genetics are providing many new insights into the phylogenetic relationships of quail and other birds (Cooke and Buckley 1987, Hillis and Moritz 1990, Sibley and Ahlquist 1990). I predict addi­ tional changes will occur in the taxonomy of New Fig. 1. Distribution and species density of New World World quail as a result of the application of these quail (after Leopold et al. 1981, Johnsgard 1988). new molecular techniques. In this paper I will discuss the most recent of these systematic and biogeographic studies to taxonomic and systematic treatments of New North American quail management. World quail (Table 2). Next I will outline some I would like to thank George Barrowclough, proposed hypotheses about quail biogeography Kevin Church, and Robert Zink for critically read­ and evolution. Finally, I will discuss the relevance ing this paper. Thomas Howell provided insight 1 National Quail Symposium Proceedings, Vol. 3 [1993], Art. 2 Taxonomy of Quail-Gutierrez 9 to the AOU's committee on nomenclature Table 1. Major taxonomic treatments of New World taxonomic treatment of the odontophorine quail. quail. TAXONOMY OF NEW WORLD Source Basis for treatment QUAIL Peters (1934) External morphology Taxonomy is the study of classifying organisms. AOU (1957) External morphology Systematics is the study of phylogenetic relation­ Holman (1961) Osteology ships and evolutionary processes that generate Brodkorb (1964) Fossil record biodiversity. The distinction is important because Hudson et al. (1966) Myology pure "alpha" level taxonomy may not be sensitive Mayr and Short (1970) External morphology to issues of phylogeny. The most interesting ques­ Sibley and Ahlquist Egg white protein tions in biology are not what an organism's name (1972) electrophoresis happens to be, but what are its ecological and Stock and Bunch (1982) Cytogenetics evolutionary relationships to other organisms Gutierrez et al. (1983) Protein electrophoresis (Brooks and McLennan 1991). Thus most current treatments of taxonomy are really systematic AOU (1983) Synopsis of literature treatments. Sibley and Ahlquist (1990) DNA-DNA hybridization Classification of Quail (Sibley and Monroe [1990]) There have been several taxonomic and sys­ tematic treatments of New World quail (fable 1). Until recently most treatments have been based cal differentiation exhibited by the New World on general morphology (i.e., plumage pattern, quail. For example, odontophorine quail are uni­ color variation, general size) and species integrity que among Galliformes by having a serrated man­ (Mayr and Short 1970). Some scientists have dible. Gutierrez et. al. (1983) also demonstrated based their inferences ofrelationship on morphol­ that the odontophorine quail were a distinct clade ogy (osteology [Holman 1961]; myology [Hudson within the Galliformes, but they did not offer a et al. 19GG]); others have based their inferences specific recommendation on the family status of on genetic analyses (protein electrophoresis the group. l\fost classification schemes place the [Gutierrez et al. 1983]; DNA hybridization [Sibley New World quail within the subfamily Odon­ and Ahlquist 1990]; see also Table 1). tophorinae without substantive comment on the Higher Taxonomi,e Levels.----All taxonomic basis for the classification (e.g., Peters 1934, Hud­ treatments of quail place them within the order son et al. 19G6, AOU 1983), although Delacour Galliformes. Sibley and Monroe's (1990) organiza­ (1951) placed them within the subfamily tion (fable 2) is somewhat different than classical Phasianinae. Despite the large number of studies approaches because they use a dichotomous clas­ on species or groups within Galliformes, there is sification which requires use of additional not a comprehensive systematic study of the en­ taxonomic levels such as "parvorder." This tire group (see Randi et al. 1991). proposed classification is considered to be a work­ Lower Ta:i:onomi,e Levels.-Many changes in ing hypothesis by the AOU committee on the taxonomy of species and subspecies of quail nomenclature (f. Howell, pers. commun.). Never­ have occurred in the past 50 years (fable 2). theless, Sibley and Monroe's approach is different Initially there was a tendency among taxonomists from other treatments because they elevate the to describe a newly collected specimen as a new New World quail to family status (i.e., Odon­ species vvhen it has morphologically differen­ tophoridae). Sibley and Ahlquist (1985, 1990) tiated from other specimens. As the biology and noted that New World quail were very distinct distribution of these species became known in from other chicken-like birds on the basis of DNA greater detail, many of the originally named hybridization experiments. The DNA hybridiza­ species were relegated to subspecific status. This tion technique (Sibley and Ahlquist 1990) upon process continues today as poorly known species which this classification was based has received in the Neotropics become known (e.g., Odon­ widespread criticism among ornithological sys­ tophoru.s). There also has been a general trend in tematists (e.g., see Lanyon 1992). ornithology to dissolve monotypic genera. The Holman (1961) suggested that New World quail recent merging of the Lophortyxquail (AOU 1957) should be distinguished as a separate family. He with Callipep/a. is an example of this trend as it based his suggestion on the significant osteologi- affects American quail. 2 Gutierrez: Taxonomy and Biogeography of New World Quail 10 Quail III Table 2. Taxonomies of New World quail. 8 Peters Howard and Moore Sibley and Monroe (1934) (1991) (1990) Parvclass Galloanserae Superorder Gallomorphae Order Galliformes Galliformes Galliformes Parvorder Odontophorida Superfamily Phasianoidea Family Phasianidae Phasianidae Odontophoridae Subfamily Odontophorinae Odontophorinae Genera Dendrortyx (4,8)b Dendrortyx (3,8) Dendrortyx (3) Oreortyx (1,3) Oreortyx (1,4) Oreortyx (1) Callipepla (1,3) Callipepla (1,4) Callipepla (4) Lophortyx (3,10) Lophortyx (3,16) Philortyx (1,1) Philortyx (1,1) Philortyx (1) Colinus (4 ,33) Colinus (3,42) Colinus (3) Odontophorus
Recommended publications
  • Sage-Grouse Hunting Season
    CHAPTER 11 UPLAND GAME BIRD AND SMALL GAME HUNTING SEASONS Section 1. Authority. This regulation is promulgated by authority of Wyoming Statutes § 23-1-302 and § 23-2-105 (d). Section 2. Hunting Regulations. (a) Bag and Possession Limit. Only one (1) daily bag limit of each species of upland game birds and small game may be taken per day regardless of the number of hunt areas hunted in a single day. When hunting more than one (1) hunt area, a person’s daily and possession limits shall be equal to, but shall not exceed, the largest daily and possession limit prescribed for any one (1) of the specified hunt areas in which the hunting and possession occurs. (b) Evidence of sex and species shall remain naturally attached to the carcass of any upland game bird in the field and during transportation. For pheasant, this shall include the feathered head, feathered wing or foot. For all other upland game bird species, this shall include one fully feathered wing. (c) No person shall possess or use shot other than nontoxic shot for hunting game birds and small game with a shotgun on the Commission’s Table Mountain and Springer wildlife habitat management areas and on all national wildlife refuges open for hunting. (d) Required Clothing. Any person hunting pheasants within the boundaries of any Wyoming Game and Fish Commission Wildlife Habitat Management Area, or on Bureau of Reclamation Withdrawal lands bordering and including Glendo State Park, shall wear in a visible manner at least one (1) outer garment of fluorescent orange or fluorescent pink color which shall include a hat, shirt, jacket, coat, vest or sweater.
    [Show full text]
  • Nogth AMERICAN BIRDS
    CHECK-LIST OF NOgTH AMERICAN BIRDS The Speciesof Birds of North America from the Arctic through Panama, Including the West Indies and Hawaiian Islands PREPARED BY THE COMMITTEE ON CLASSIFICATION AND NOMENCLATURE OF THE AMERICAN ORNITHOLOGISTS' UNION SEVENTH EDITION 1998 Zo61ogical nomenclature is a means, not an end, to Zo61ogical Science PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN ORNITHOLOGISTS' UNION 1998 Copyright 1998 by The American Ornithologists' Union All rights reserved, except that pages or sections may be quoted for research purposes. ISBN Number: 1-891276-00-X Preferred citation: American Ornithologists' Union. 1983. Check-list of North American Birds. 7th edition. American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C. Printed by Allen Press, Inc. Lawrence, Kansas, U.S.A. CONTENTS DEDICATION ...................................................... viii PREFACE ......................................................... ix LIST OF SPECIES ................................................... xvii THE CHECK-LIST ................................................... 1 I. Tinamiformes ............................................. 1 1. Tinamidae: Tinamous .................................. 1 II. Gaviiformes .............................................. 3 1. Gaviidae: Loons ....................................... 3 III. Podicipediformes.......................................... 5 1. Podicipedidae:Grebes .................................. 5 IV. Procellariiformes .......................................... 9 1. Diomedeidae: Albatrosses .............................
    [Show full text]
  • CATALINA CALIFORNIA QUAIL (Callipepla Californica Catalinensis) Paul W
    II SPECIES ACCOUNTS Andy Birch PDF of Catalina California Quail account from: Shuford, W. D., and Gardali, T., editors. 2008. California Bird Species of Special Concern: A ranked assessment of species, subspecies, and distinct populations of birds of immediate conservation concern in California. Studies of Western Birds 1. Western Field Ornithologists, Camarillo, California, and California Department of Fish and Game, Sacramento. California Bird Species of Special Concern CATALINA CALIFORNIA QUAIL (Callipepla californica catalinensis) Paul W. Collins Criteria Scores Population Trend 0 Santa Range Trend 0 Barbara County Population Size 7.5 Range Size 10 Ventura Endemism 10 County Population Concentration 10 Threats 0 Los San Miguel Is. Santa Cruz Is. Angeles County Anacapa Is. Santa Rosa Is. Santa Barbara Is. Santa Catalina Is. San Nicolas Is. San Clemente Is. Current Year-round Range Historic Year-round Range County Boundaries Kilometers 20 10 0 20 Current and historic (ca. 1944) year-round range of the Catalina California Quail. Birds from Santa Catalina Island (perhaps brought by Native Americans) later introduced successfully to Santa Rosa (1935–1940) and Santa Cruz (late 1940s) islands, but unsuccessfully to San Nicolas Island (1962); quail from mainland populations of C. c. californica introduced unsuccessfully to Santa Cruz (prior to 1875) and San Clemente (late 19th century, 1913) islands. Catalina California Quail Studies of Western Birds 1:107–111, 2008 107 Studies of Western Birds No. 1 SPECIAL CONCERN PRIORITY HISTORIC RANGE AND ABUNDANCE Currently considered a Bird Species of Special IN CALIFORNIA Concern (year round), priority 3. This subspecies Grinnell and Miller (1944) described the Catalina was not included on prior special concern lists California Quail as a “common to abundant” (Remsen 1978, CDFG 1992).
    [Show full text]
  • 111 Historical Notes on Whooping Cranes at White
    HISTORICAL NOTES ON WHOOPING CRANES AT WHITE LAKE, LOUISIANA: THE JOHN J. LYNCH INTERVIEWS, 1947-1948 GAY M. GOMEZ, Department of Social Sciences, McNeese State University, Box 92335, Lake Charles, LA 70609, USA RODERICK C. DREWIEN, Hornocker Wildlife Institute, University of Idaho, 3346 E 200 N, Rigby, ID 83442, USA MARY LYNCH COURVILLE, John J. Lynch American Natural Heritage Park, 1393 Henderson Highway, Breaux Bridge, LA 70517, USA Abstract: In May 1939 biologist John J. Lynch of the U.S. Bureau of Biological Survey conducted an aerial survey that documented the existence of a non-migratory population of whooping cranes (Grus americana) near White Lake in southwest Louisiana. Lynch found 13 cranes, including 2 pre-fledged young, confirming breeding. Lynch’s survey occurred, in part, because fur trappers and alligator hunters working in the White Lake marshes had informed the biologist of the cranes’ presence and habits. Lynch con- tinued his contacts with these knowledgeable marsh users, and in 1947 and 1948 interviewed at least 7 individuals. In 2001, M. L. Courville, along with her sister Nora Z. Lynch, discovered the interview notes among their father’s papers. The notes contain information on the Louisiana non-migratory population’s range, abundance, habitat use, feeding behavior, nesting, and young, including survival of twins; they also include a small amount of information on sandhill cranes (Grus canadensis) and migratory whooping cranes. Both Lynch and Robert P. Allen relied heavily on this “traditional ecological knowledge” in their accounts of non-migratory whooping cranes in southwest Louisiana. Because of their biological and historical significance, the interview notes are reproduced in this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Birds of Bharatpur – Check List
    BIRDS OF BHARATPUR – CHECK LIST Family PHASIANIDAE: Pheasants, Partridges, Quail Check List BLACK FRANCOLIN GREY FRANCOLIN COMMON QUAIL RAIN QUAIL JUNGLE BUSH QUAIL YELLOW-LEGGED BUTTON QUAIL BARRED BUTTON QUAIL PAINTED SPURFOWL INDIAN PEAFOWL Family ANATIDAE: Ducks, Geese, Swans GREATER WHITE-FRONTED GOOSE GREYLAG GOOSE BAR-HEADED GOOSE LWSSER WHISTLING-DUCK RUDDY SHELDUCK COMMON SHELDUCK COMB DUCK COTTON PYGMY GOOSE MARBLED DUCK GADWALL FALCATED DUCK EURASIAN WIGEON MALLARD SPOT-BILLED DUCK COMMON TEAL GARGANEY NORTHERN PINTAIL NORTHERN SHOVELER RED-CRESTED POCHARD COMMON POCHARD FERRUGINOUS POCHARD TUFTED DUCK BAIKAL TEAL GREATER SCAUP BAER’S POCHARD Family PICIDAE: Woodpeckers EURASIAN WRYNECK BROWN-CAPPED PYGMY WOODPECKER YELLOW-CROWNED WOODPECKER BLACK-RUMPED FLAMBACK Family CAPITONIDAE: Barbets BROWN-HEADED BARBET COPPERSMITH BARBET Family UPUPIDAE: Hoopoes COMMON HOOPOE Family BUCEROTIDAE: Hornbills INDAIN GREY HORNBILL Family CORACIIDAE: Rollers or Blue Jays EUROPEAN ROLLER INDIAN ROLLER Family ALCEDINIDAE: Kingfisher COMMON KINGFISHER STORK-BILLED KINGFISHER WHITE-THROATED KINGFISHER BLACK-CAPPED KINGFISHER PIED KINGFISHER Family MEROPIDAE: Bee-eaters GREEN BEE-EATER BLUE-CHEEKED BEE-EATER BLUE-TAILED BEE-EATER Family CUCULIDAE: Cuckoos, Crow-pheasants PIED CUCKOO CHESTNUT-WINGED CUCKOO COMMON HAWK CUCKOO INDIAN CUCKOO EURASIAN CUCKOO GREY-BELLIED CUCKOO PLAINTIVE CUCKOO DRONGO CUCKOO ASIAN KOEL SIRKEER MALKOHA GREATER COUCAL LESSER COUCAL Family PSITTACIDAS: Parrots ROSE-RINGED PARAKEET PLUM-HEADED PARKEET Family APODIDAE:
    [Show full text]
  • Masked Bobwhite (Colinus Virginianus Ridgwayi) 5-Year Review
    Masked Bobwhite (Colinus virginianus ridgwayi) 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation Photograph by Paul Zimmerman U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Buenos Aires National Wildlife Refuge Sasabe, AZ March 2014 5-YEAR REVIEW Masked Bobwhite (Colinus virginianus ridgwayi) 1.0 GENERAL INFORMATION 1.1 Reviewers Lead Regional Office Southwest Region, Region 2, Albuquerque, NM Susan Jacobsen, Chief, Division of Classification and Restoration, 505-248-6641 Wendy Brown, Chief, Branch of Recovery and Restoration, 505-248-6664 Jennifer Smith-Castro, Recovery Biologist, 505-248-6663 Lead Field Office: Buenos Aires National Wildlife Refuge (BANWR) Sally Gall, Refuge Manager, 520-823-4251 x 102 Juliette Fernandez, Assistant Refuge Manager, 520-823-4251 x 103 Dan Cohan, Wildlife Biologist, 520-823-4351 x 105 Mary Hunnicutt, Wildlife Biologist, 520-823-4251 Cooperating Field Office(s): Arizona Ecological Services Tucson Field Office Jean Calhoun, Assistant Field Supervisor, 520-670-6150 x 223 Mima Falk, Senior Listing Biologist, 520-670-6150 x 225 Scott Richardson, Supervisory Fish and Wildlife Biologist, 520-670-6150 x 242 Mark Crites, Fish and Wildlife Biologist, 520-670-6150 x 229 Arizona Ecological Services Field Office Steve Spangle, Field Supervisor, 602-242-0210 x 244 1.2 Purpose of 5-Year Reviews: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service or USFWS) is required by section 4(c)(2) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) to conduct a status review of each listed species once every 5 years. The purpose of a 5-year review is to evaluate whether or not the species’ status has changed since it was listed (or since the most recent 5-year review).
    [Show full text]
  • Wisconsin Bird Nesting Dates for Species Tracked by the Natural
    Introduction to the “Wisconsin Bird Nesting Dates (Avoidance Period) for Species Tracked by the Natural Heritage Inventory” The table “Wisconsin Bird Nesting Dates (Avoidance Period) for Species Tracked by the Natural Heritage Inventory” below, provides guidance to DNR staff and external certified reviewers who use the NHI Portal for Endangered Resources reviews. This guidance was developed by a team of Natural Heritage Conservation program staff from DNR using the best available information for species on the Natural Heritage Working List. The Nesting Dates (Avoidance Period) table was developed to help customers comply with State and Federal laws and thus avoid “intentional taking, killing, or possession” of bird nests, eggs, and body parts. For each species, the avoidance dates are the period each year when birds are most vulnerable because there are eggs or flightless chicks in nests. Species tracked by the Natural Heritage Inventory include endangered, threatened and special concern species. Avoidance of these nesting dates is required for endangered and threatened species and recommended (voluntary) for special concern species. For more information on rare bird species, see the Rare Bird webpage. Revised 10/18/2019 https://dnr.wi.gov/topic/endangeredresources/documents/wisbirdnestingcalendar.pdf Wisconsin Bird Avoidance Dates for Species Tracked by the Natural Heritage Inventory Common Name Scientific Name Status Avoidance Dates Acadian Flycatcher Empidonax virescens THR 25 May - 20 Aug American Bittern Botaurus lentiginosus SC/M
    [Show full text]
  • Body Temperatures in California and Gambel's Quail
    150 Baa•oz,o•awand DawsoN, California and Gambel's Quail [1VoL Auk 75 BODY TEMPERATURES IN CALIFORNIA AND GAMBEL'S QUAIL BY GEORGE A. BARTHOLOMEW AND WILLIAM R. DAWSON Tm• paucity of data on the body temperaturesof small gallinaceous birds prompts us to report miscellaneousobservations which we have made over the past severalyears on the body temperaturesof the Cali- fornia Quail, Lophortyxcalifornicus, a commonresident in grasslandand chaparral from southernOregon to southern Baja Cal/fornia, and the Gambel's Quail, L. œambelii,a residentin the desert regionsof south- western United States and northwestern Mexico. The habitats of both speciesare characterizedby high summer temperaturesand moderate winter conditions. We have therefore paid particular attention to capacity for temperature regulation in hot environments. We found that when ambient (environmental)temperature rose, the birds' body temperaturecould rise by as much as 4ø C. (7.2ø F.), without ill effects. Ability to maintain above normal body temperatures higher than ambient temperaturesfacilitates transfer of excessbody heat to the environment. It is probablya major avian adaptationto hot conditions. The data presentedwere acquiredincidental to work on other species and for that reasonare not comprehensive,but they serveto characterize aspectsof temperatureregulation in quail. MATERIALS AND METHODS The observationswere made on 8 adult and 2 juvenile California Quailcaptured on the LosAngeles campus of the Universityof California, and on 5 adult and 2 juvenile Gambers Quail capturedin the Colorado Desert, three miles south of Calipatria, Imperial County, California. The captive animals of both specieswere housedin cagesof half-inch wire mesh wh/ch measured 12 x 12 x 24 inches and had sand-covered floors.
    [Show full text]
  • Bird List with Jake Mohlmann
    Cumulative Bird List with Jake Mohlmann Column A: number of tours (out of 10) on which this species has been recorded Column B: number of days this species was seen on the 2020 tour Column C: maximum daily count for this species on the 2020 tour Column D: H = Heard only A B C D 1 Pacific Loon Gavia pacifica 1 Common Loon Gavia immer 1 Greater White-fronted Goose Anser albifrons 9 Snow Goose 1 65 Chen caerulescens 5 Ross's Goose 1 2 Chen rossii 3 Canada Goose Branta canadensis 1 Wood Duck Aix sponsa 10 Gadwall 3 15 Anas strepera 2 Eurasian Wigeon Anas penelope 10 American Wigeon 2 400 Anas americana 10 Mallard 2 6 Anas platyrhynchos 10 Mexican Duck 1 3 Anas diazi 4 Blue-winged Teal Anas discors 10 Cinnamon Teal 2 10 Anas cyanoptera 10 Northern Shoveler 2 100 Anas clypeata 10 Northern Pintail 1 150 Anas acuta 10 Green-winged Teal 2 50 Anas crecca 9 Canvasback 1 5 Aythya valisineria 6 Redhead 2 2 Aythya americana 10 Ring-necked Duck 2 15 Aythya collaris 1 Greater Scaup 1 2 Aythya marila 9 Lesser Scaup 1 6 Aythya affinis 7 Bufflehead 1 3 Bucephala albeola 10 Common Merganser 1 37 Mergus merganser 10 Ruddy Duck 3 30 Oxyura jamaicensis 5 Scaled Quail Callipepla squamata 10 Gambel's Quail 3 12 Callipepla gambelii 4 Montezuma Quail 1 15 Cyrtonyx montezumae 9 Wild Turkey 2 18 Melagris gallopavo merriamii ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ WINGS ● 1643 N. Alvernon Way Ste. 109 ● Tucson ● AZ ● 85712 ● www.wingsbirds.com (866) 547 9868 Toll free US + Canada ● Tel (520) 320-9868
    [Show full text]
  • The Coastal Scrub and Chaparral Bird Conservation Plan
    The Coastal Scrub and Chaparral Bird Conservation Plan A Strategy for Protecting and Managing Coastal Scrub and Chaparral Habitats and Associated Birds in California A Project of California Partners in Flight and PRBO Conservation Science The Coastal Scrub and Chaparral Bird Conservation Plan A Strategy for Protecting and Managing Coastal Scrub and Chaparral Habitats and Associated Birds in California Version 2.0 2004 Conservation Plan Authors Grant Ballard, PRBO Conservation Science Mary K. Chase, PRBO Conservation Science Tom Gardali, PRBO Conservation Science Geoffrey R. Geupel, PRBO Conservation Science Tonya Haff, PRBO Conservation Science (Currently at Museum of Natural History Collections, Environmental Studies Dept., University of CA) Aaron Holmes, PRBO Conservation Science Diana Humple, PRBO Conservation Science John C. Lovio, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, U.S. Navy (Currently at TAIC, San Diego) Mike Lynes, PRBO Conservation Science (Currently at Hastings University) Sandy Scoggin, PRBO Conservation Science (Currently at San Francisco Bay Joint Venture) Christopher Solek, Cal Poly Ponoma (Currently at UC Berkeley) Diana Stralberg, PRBO Conservation Science Species Account Authors Completed Accounts Mountain Quail - Kirsten Winter, Cleveland National Forest. Greater Roadrunner - Pete Famolaro, Sweetwater Authority Water District. Coastal Cactus Wren - Laszlo Szijj and Chris Solek, Cal Poly Pomona. Wrentit - Geoff Geupel, Grant Ballard, and Mary K. Chase, PRBO Conservation Science. Gray Vireo - Kirsten Winter, Cleveland National Forest. Black-chinned Sparrow - Kirsten Winter, Cleveland National Forest. Costa's Hummingbird (coastal) - Kirsten Winter, Cleveland National Forest. Sage Sparrow - Barbara A. Carlson, UC-Riverside Reserve System, and Mary K. Chase. California Gnatcatcher - Patrick Mock, URS Consultants (San Diego). Accounts in Progress Rufous-crowned Sparrow - Scott Morrison, The Nature Conservancy (San Diego).
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Ecology of Montezuma Quail in the Davis Mountains of Texas
    ECOLOGY OF MONTEZUMA QUAIL IN THE DAVIS MOUNTAINS OF TEXAS A Thesis By CURTIS D. GREENE Submitted to the School of Agricultural and Natural Resource Sciences Sul Ross State University, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE December 2011 Major Subject: Range and Wildlife Management ECOLOGY OF MONTEZUMA QUAIL IN THE DAVIS MOUNTAINS OF TEXAS A Thesis By CURTIS D. GREENE Approved as to style and content by: _______________________________ ____________________________ Louis A. Harveson, Ph.D. Dale Rollins, Ph.D. (Chair of Committee) (Member) ____________________________ Patricia Moody Harveson, Ph.D. (Member) _______________________ Robert J. Kinucan, Ph.D. Dean of Agricultural and Natural Resource Sciences ABSTRACT Montezuma quail (Cyrtonyx montezumae) occur throughout the desert mountain ranges in the Trans Pecos of Texas as well as the states of New Mexico and Arizona. Limited information on life history and ecology of the species is available due to the cryptic nature of the bird. Home range, movements, and preferred habitats have been speculated upon in previous literature with the use of observational or anecdotal data. With modern trapping techniques and technologically advanced radio transmitters, Montezuma quail have been successfully monitored providing assessments of their ecology with the use of hard data. The objective of this study was to monitor Montezuma quail to determine home range size, movements, habitat preference, and assess population dynamics for the Davis Mountains population. Over the course of two years (2009 – 2010) a total of 72 birds (36M, 35F, 1 Undetermined) were captured. Thirteen individuals with >25 locations per bird were evaluated in the home range, movement, and habitat selection analyses.
    [Show full text]
  • Dendrortyx Macroura
    Sección científica _ A new record of eggs and a domed nest of the Long-tailed Wood-Partridge (Dendrortyx macroura). Gilberto Chávez-León. Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuarias, Campo Experimental Uruapan. Av. Latinoamericana 1101, Colonia Revolución, Uruapan, 60050, Michoacán, México. E-mail: [email protected]. Abstract A domed nest with four eggs of the Long-tailed Wood-Partridge (Dendrortyx macroura) was found on 29 April 1998 at 1900 m in Barranca del Cupatitzio National Park, Michoacán, Mexico. I describe the vegetation at the site and the structure of the nest and a clutch of four eggs found on 11 June 1998 in the nearby communal forest of Nuevo San Juan Parangaricutiro. Key words: nesting, Trans Mexican Volcanic Belt, Odontophoridae. Un nuevo registro de huevos y de un nido abovedado de Dendrortyx macroura. Resumen El 29 de abril de 1998 encontré un nido abovedado con cuatro huevos de Dendrortyx macroura, a una altitud de 1900 m, en el Parque Nacional Barranca del Cupatitzio, Uruapan, Michoacán, México. Aquí describo la vegetación del sitio y la estructura del nido, al igual que una nidada de cuatro huevos encontrada el 11 de junio de 1998 en el vecino bosque comunal de Nuevo San Juan Parangaricutiro. Palabras clave: anidación, Eje Volcánico Trans Mexicano, Odontophoridae. HUITZIL (2010) 11(2):66-68 Introduction the nests were in somewhat open habitats at the edge of a Nests of New World quails (Odontophoridae) are usually maize field bordering the thick understory vegetation of a open scrapes on the ground surrounded by grass or brush, steep slope in an area of cloud forest (Rowley 1966).
    [Show full text]