Global Standard-Setting Bodies and Financial Inclusion the Evolving Landscape
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
24979 BOB Brochure A5 Blue.Indd
THE BANK’S VISION The Bank aspires to be a world-class central bank with the highest standards of corporate governance and professional excellence. THE BANK’S MISSION The mission of the Bank is to contribute to the sound economic and financial well-being of the country. The Bank seeks to promote and maintain: • monetary stability; • a safe, sound and stable financial system; • an efficient payments mechanism; • public confidence in the national currency; • sound international financial relations; and to • provide efficient banking services to its various clients; and sound economic and financial advice to Government i Contents The Bank’s Vision and Mission (i) Introduction 2 Primary Objectives of the Bank 2 Formulating and Implementing Monetary Policy 3 Providing Central Banking Services 5 Licensing, Supervising and Regulating 6 Commercial Banks and Other Financial Institutions Serving as Economic and Financial Advisor 7 to Government Implementing Exchange Rate Policy 7 Managing Foreign Exchange Reserves 7 Bank of Botswana’s Public Education Programme 8 on Banking Printed in 2007 1 Introduction The Bank of Botswana, the central bank of the Republic of Botswana, was established by an Act of Parliament (Bank of Botswana Act. Cap. 55:01). The Bank came into existence on July 1, 1975. It is wholly owned by the Botswana Government. However, it enjoys a high degree of autonomy in the performance of most of its functions. The Bank’s headquarters are in Gaborone; and it has a branch in Francistown. The Governor is the Bank’s chief executive officer. The Governor is appointed by the President of the Republic of Botswana for a renewable term of five years. -
A Critique of Australia's G20 Presidency and The
Global Summitry Advance Access published July 1, 2015 Article A Critique of Australia’s G20 Presidency and the Brisbane Summit 2014 Susan Harris Rimmer Australian Research Council Future Fellow, Asia Pacific College of Diplomacy, Coral Bell School of Asia Pacific Affairs, College of Asia and the Pacific, Asia Pacific College of Diplomacy, The Australian National University This article seeks to evaluate Australia as host of the Brisbane G20 Summit in 2014. The Australian G20 government, it appears, aimed to move the G20 from focusing on just responding to the financial crisis to a future growth orientation concentrating on structural reforms. To achieve this, Australia chose a narrow economic approach to the agenda. The Presidency sought to avoid engaging with broader security or climate change challenges. This effort to narrow focus and move away from a “war cabinet” approach met, however, with quite mixed success. A strong performance at the regulatory level, an emphasis on eco- nomic fundamentals and a place-branding approach to the Leaders’ Summit, all efforts of the Australian host, appear to have been insufficient for Australia’s G20 Presidency. Three additional factors seem necessary for a middle power like Australia to have impact on host- ing the Leaders’ Summit: • evidence of substantial and effective political leadership; • a credible outreach narrative to citizens broadly that emphasizes the unique perspective of the Host; and • a serious investment in the troika style leadership of the Summit. This essay raises questions over Australia’s leadership of the G20, and then examines impor- tant broader questions of G20 leadership concerned with this institution’s overall effective- ness and the success of the outreach efforts. -
Financial Stability Report
FINANCIAL STABILITY REPORT REPUBLIC OF BOTSWANA MINISTRY OF FINANCE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MAY 2021 FINANCIAL STABILITY COUNCIL FINANCIAL STABILITY REPORT RepublicREPUBLIC of OF Botswana BOTSWANA MINISTRYMinistry OF FINANCE Of ANDHealth ECONOMIC & Wellness DEVELOPMENT MAY 2021 FINANCIAL STABILITY COUNCIL Financial Stability Council | Financial Stability Report May 2021 iii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES, CHART AND FIGURES………………………………...………………..v ABBREVIATIONS …………………………………………………………...………………...vi ACKNOWLEDGEMENT……………………………………………………………………...vii PREFACE……………………………………………………………………...…………….…viii 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY………………………………………………………………1 2. FINANCIAL STABILITY DEVELOPMENTS AND TRENDS………………………3 (a) Global Financial Stability Developments………………………………………………….3 (b) Regional Financial Stability Developments and Trends…………………………………..3 (c) Domestic Financial Stability Developments………………………………………………4 3. DOMESTIC MACROPRUDENTIAL ANALYSIS……………………………………5 (a) Sovereign Vulnerabilities………………………………………………………………….5 (b) Credit Growth and Leverage………………………………………………………………5 Box 3.1: Tools for Assessing Excessive Credit Growth…………………………………………...9 (c) Liquidity and Funding Risk………………………………………………………………15 (d) Macro Financial Linkages and Contagion Risk…………………………………………..21 (e) Banking Sector Stress Test Results……………………………………………………….26 4. FINANCIAL MARKET INFRASTRUCTURE AND REGULATORY DEVELOPMENTS……………………………………………………………………...31 (a) Payments and Settlements Systems………………………………………………………31 (b) Regulatory Developments………………………………………………………………...31 Box 4.1: D-SIBs Methodology -
Aid for Trade
The G20 Research Group at Trinity College at the Munk School of Global Affairs in the University of Toronto with the International Organisations Research Institute at the National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow present the 2014 Brisbane G20 Summit Final Compliance Report 17 November 2014 to 1 October 2015 Prepared by Krystel Montpetit, Theodora Mladenova, Mickael Deprez, Jonathan Tavone, Phil Gazaleh, Taylor Grott and Antonia Tsapralis G20 Research Group, Toronto, and Andrei Sakharov, Andrey Shelepov and Mark Rakhmangulov International Organisations Research Institute, Moscow 14 November 2015 www.g20.utoronto.ca [email protected] “The University of Toronto … produced a detailed analysis to the extent of which each G20 country has met its commitments since the last summit … I think this is important; we come to these summits, we make these commitments, we say we are going to do these things and it is important that there is an organisation that checks up on who has done what.” — David Cameron, Prime Minister, United Kingdom, at the 2012 Los Cabos Summit Contents Preface ................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Research Team ........................................................................................................................................... 4 Analysts at the University of Toronto .................................................................................................. -
List of Certain Foreign Institutions Classified As Official for Purposes of Reporting on the Treasury International Capital (TIC) Forms
NOT FOR PUBLICATION DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY JANUARY 2001 Revised Aug. 2002, May 2004, May 2005, May/July 2006, June 2007 List of Certain Foreign Institutions classified as Official for Purposes of Reporting on the Treasury International Capital (TIC) Forms The attached list of foreign institutions, which conform to the definition of foreign official institutions on the Treasury International Capital (TIC) Forms, supersedes all previous lists. The definition of foreign official institutions is: "FOREIGN OFFICIAL INSTITUTIONS (FOI) include the following: 1. Treasuries, including ministries of finance, or corresponding departments of national governments; central banks, including all departments thereof; stabilization funds, including official exchange control offices or other government exchange authorities; and diplomatic and consular establishments and other departments and agencies of national governments. 2. International and regional organizations. 3. Banks, corporations, or other agencies (including development banks and other institutions that are majority-owned by central governments) that are fiscal agents of national governments and perform activities similar to those of a treasury, central bank, stabilization fund, or exchange control authority." Although the attached list includes the major foreign official institutions which have come to the attention of the Federal Reserve Banks and the Department of the Treasury, it does not purport to be exhaustive. Whenever a question arises whether or not an institution should, in accordance with the instructions on the TIC forms, be classified as official, the Federal Reserve Bank with which you file reports should be consulted. It should be noted that the list does not in every case include all alternative names applying to the same institution. -
Aligning G20 Infrastructure Investment with Climate Goals & the 2030 Agenda
Foundations Platform F20: A report to the G20 Aligning G20 Infrastructure Investment with Climate Goals & the 2030 Agenda www.brookings.edu www.bu.edu/gdp Authors: Amar Bhattacharya and Minji Jeong, Global Economy and Development Program, The Brookings Institution1 Kevin P. Gallagher, Miquel Muñoz Cabré, and Xinyue Ma, Global Development Policy (GDP) Center2 , Boston University Suggested Citation: Bhattacharya, A., Gallagher, K.P., Muñoz Cabré, M., Jeong, M., & Ma, X. (2019) Aligning G20 Infrastructure Investment with Climate Goals and the 2030 Agenda, Foundations 20 Platform, a report to the G20. Published: June 2019 Cover and Design: Rick Lawrence, Samskara Design | www.samskara-design.com Notification This report is written in the spirit of the mission statement of the F20 platform. It does not necessarily represent the views of each participating organization on the platform. The publishers encourage the circulation of this report. Please credit the authors and publishing organizations accordingly. 1 The contribution of the Brookings Institution team was undertaken under the Sustainable Growth and Finance Initiative of the New Climate Economy. Amar Bhattacharya would like to acknowledge the joint work with Professor Nicholas Stern over the past several years on the issues of this report. 2 The GDP Center would like to thank Rebecca Dunn, William Kring, Rebecca Ray, Hannah Schwank, Lilly Bayly, Xintong Bu, and Kehan Wang for timely and meticulous research assistance for this paper. In the end, any errors are those of the authors. Aligning G20 Infrastructure Investment with Climate Goals & the 2030 Agenda A report by theFoundation Foundations Platform Platform Presentation Foreword In many parts of the world, the issue of climate change and the UN 2030 Agenda with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are experiencing an unprecedented momentum. -
Tax Relief Country: Italy Security: Intesa Sanpaolo S.P.A
Important Notice The Depository Trust Company B #: 15497-21 Date: August 24, 2021 To: All Participants Category: Tax Relief, Distributions From: International Services Attention: Operations, Reorg & Dividend Managers, Partners & Cashiers Tax Relief Country: Italy Security: Intesa Sanpaolo S.p.A. CUSIPs: 46115HAU1 Subject: Record Date: 9/2/2021 Payable Date: 9/17/2021 CA Web Instruction Deadline: 9/16/2021 8:00 PM (E.T.) Participants can use DTC’s Corporate Actions Web (CA Web) service to certify all or a portion of their position entitled to the applicable withholding tax rate. Participants are urged to consult TaxInfo before certifying their instructions over CA Web. Important: Prior to certifying tax withholding instructions, participants are urged to read, understand and comply with the information in the Legal Conditions category found on TaxInfo over the CA Web. ***Please read this Important Notice fully to ensure that the self-certification document is sent to the agent by the indicated deadline*** Questions regarding this Important Notice may be directed to Acupay at +1 212-422-1222. Important Legal Information: The Depository Trust Company (“DTC”) does not represent or warrant the accuracy, adequacy, timeliness, completeness or fitness for any particular purpose of the information contained in this communication, which is based in part on information obtained from third parties and not independently verified by DTC and which is provided as is. The information contained in this communication is not intended to be a substitute for obtaining tax advice from an appropriate professional advisor. In providing this communication, DTC shall not be liable for (1) any loss resulting directly or indirectly from mistakes, errors, omissions, interruptions, delays or defects in such communication, unless caused directly by gross negligence or willful misconduct on the part of DTC, and (2) any special, consequential, exemplary, incidental or punitive damages. -
China, the G20 and Global Economic Governance
China, the G20 and global Hugh Jorgensen Daniela Strube economic governance November 2014 CHINA, THE G20 AND GLOBAL ECONOMIC GOVERNANCE The Lowy Institute for International Policy is an independent policy think tank. Its mandate ranges across all the dimensions of international policy debate in Australia – economic, political and strategic – and it is not limited to a particular geographic region. Its two core tasks are to: • produce distinctive research and fresh policy options for Australia’s international policy and to contribute to the wider international debate. • promote discussion of Australia’s role in the world by providing an accessible and high-quality forum for discussion of Australian international relations through debates, seminars, lectures, dialogues and conferences. Lowy Institute Analyses are short papers analysing recent international trends and events and their policy implications. The views expressed in this paper are entirely the authors’ own and not those of the Lowy Institute for International Policy. CHINA, THE G20 AND GLOBAL ECONOMIC GOVERNANCE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY At the closing of the 2014 G20 Brisbane Summit, the presidency of the 2016 G20 was awarded to China. This is the first time China will chair the world’s ‘premier forum for economic cooperation’. Yet the G20 is just one way that China, now the world’s largest economy on purchasing power parity terms, may seek to shape global economic governance. China is both seeking changes to the ‘traditional’ global economic governance model, centred upon the Bretton Woods Institutions, and experimenting with new processes such as the BRICS forum and the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank. For the moment at least, China will not ‘place all its eggs in one basket’. -
Basel Pillar 3 Disclosures for the Quarter Ended 30 June 2020
________________________________________ Basel Pillar 3 Disclosures For the Quarter Ended 30 June 2020 Table of Contents 1.0 Background and Scope .............................................................................................................................. 3 2.0 Regulatory Capital Requirements .............................................................................................................. 4 2.1 Capital Structure .................................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Capital Adequacy ...................................................................................................................................... 9 2.2.1 Qualitative Disclosures ......................................................................................................................... 9 2.2.2 Quantitative disclosures ........................................................................................................................ 9 c) Capital requirement for Operational Risk ................................................................................................ 11 Table 25: Regulatory and IFRS publication for First Capital Bank ................................................................. 12 Table 28: Main features of regulatory capital instruments ............................................................................... 16 3.0 Credit Risk .............................................................................................................................................. -
BIS Papers No 17, Part 1, May 2003
Table of contents Participants in the meeting ..................................................................................................................iii Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 1 Economics Economic aspects of regional currency areas and the use of foreign currencies John Hawkins and Paul Masson ............................................................................................................. 4 Europe Regional currency areas: a few lessons from the experiences of the Eurosystem and the CFA franc zone Marc-Olivier Strauss-Kahn (Bank of France)......................................................................................... 42 The currency board and monetary stability in Bosnia and Herzegovina Dragan Kovačević (Central Bank of Bosnia and Herzegovina)............................................................. 58 Shadowing the euro: Bulgaria’s monetary policy five years on Kalin Hristov and Martin Zaimov (Bulgarian National Bank) ................................................................. 61 Monetary policy and management of capital flows in a situation of high euroisation - the case of Croatia Boris Vujčić (Croatian National Bank) ................................................................................................... 79 Malta’s exchange rate arrangements - a medium-term perspective David Pullicino and Alfred Demarco (Central Bank of Malta)............................................................... -
Classification of Accounts Guide Last Updated – January 2018
Classification of Accounts Guide Last updated – January 2018 Contents Part I: General introduction Part II: Residence Part III: Sector categories Part IV.1 – IV.2: Industrial classification Part IV.3: Relationship between sector and industrial classifications Part V.1: Sector components (ESA 10) and sub components Part V.2: List of countries 1 Part I Classification of Accounts Guide – General Introduction I.1 Foreword This guide is intended for all institutions completing a range of Bank of England statistical returns. It describes the two most important systems of classification used in compiling economic and financial statistics in the United Kingdom – the economic sector classification, and the industrial classification. This guide is intended to serve both as an introduction for newcomers and as a source of reference. The nomenclature in the sector classification is in line with international standards – in particular, the European System of National and Regional Accounts (abbreviated to ‘ESA10’). In addition, the analysis of industrial activity is in line with the 2007 standard industrial classification of economic activities (SIC) introduced by the Office for National Statistics. Those without knowledge of accounts classification are recommended to refer to the ‘Guide to Classification’ (Part I Section 3) which takes the reader through the main questions to be answered to help classify accounts correctly. The system of classification used in this guide is solely for statistical purposes. Parts II to IV of the guide describe the main aspects of the classification system in more detail, including lists of examples of institutions, or a web link reference, for many categories. I.2 An introduction to the classification of accounts Sector and industrial classification To understand the underlying behaviour which is reflected in movements in economic and financial statistics, it is necessary to group those entities engaged in financial transactions into broad sectors with similar characteristics. -
Payment Systems in Botswana
THE PAYMENT SYSTEM IN BOTSWANA Table of Contents OVERVIEW OF THE NATIONAL PAYMENT SYSTEM IN BOTSWANA ....................... 21 1. INSTITUTIONAL ASPECTS .............................................................................................. 21 1.1 General legal aspects ................................................................................................... 21 1.2 Financial intermediaries that provide payment services ........................................ 21 1.2.1 Commercial banks .............................................................................................. 22 1.2.2 Other financial and non-financial institutions ................................................... 22 1.2.3 Other institutions/intermediaries offering payment services ............................. 23 1.3 Role of the central bank ............................................................................................. 23 1.3.1 Establishment of the Central Bank ..................................................................... 23 1.3.2 Role of the central bank in the payment system ................................................. 23 1.3.3 Banking services provided by the central bank .................................................. 23 1.3.4 Money markets .................................................................................................... 24 1.3.5 Correspondent banking arrangements ............................................................... 24 1.3.6 Payment services for the government ................................................................