DOCSLIB.ORG

Efficient Use of Resources in Steel Plant Through Process Integration (Reffiplant) in Steel Plant Through Process Integration (Reffiplant) EUR 28457

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Efficient Use of Resources in Steel Plant Through Process Integration (Reffiplant) in Steel Plant Through Process Integration (Reffiplant) EUR 28457 ISSN 1831-9424 (PDF) ISSN 1018-5593 (Printed) EU Efficient use of resources Efficient use of resources in steel plant through process integration (Reffiplant) in steel plant through process integration (Reffiplant) EUR 28457 EUR Research and Innovation EUR 28457 EN EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General for Research and Innovation Directorate D — Industrial Technologies Unit D.4 — Coal and Steel E-mail: [email protected] [email protected] Contact: RFCS Publications European Commission B-1049 Brussels European Commission Research Fund for Coal and Steel Efficient use of resources in steel plant through process integration (Reffiplant) Valentina Colla Scuola Superiore di Studi Universitari e di Perfezionamento Sant’Anna Piazza Martiri della Libertà, 33 IT-56127 Pisa, ITALY Erika Alcamisi, Ismael Matino Scuola Superiore di Studi Universitari e di Perfezionamento Sant'Anna Piazza Martiri della Libertà 33, IT-56127 Pisa, ITALY Lea Romaniello ILVA S.p.A. Viale Certosa 249, IT-20251, Milano, ITALY Mansour Saiepour Tata Steel UK Ltd Millbank 30, GB-SW1P4WY London, UNITED KINGDOM Ida Heintz, Johan Riesbeck, Jonas Zetterholm, Katarina Lundkvist, Mats Brämming Swerea MEFOS AB Arontorpsvagen 1, SE-971 25 Luleå, SWEDEN Anita Wedholm, Katarina Kylefors SSAB EMEA AB SE-613 80 Oxelösund, SWEDEN Yuhang Lou, Kokil Jain, Steve Doyle Process Integration Limited Station House, Stamford New Road, Altrincham, Cheshire WA14 1EP, UNITED KINGDOM Grant Agreement RFSR-CT-2012-00039 1 July 2012 to 31 December 2015 Final report Directorate-General for Research and Innovation 2017 EUR 28457 EN LEGAL NOTICE Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use which might be made of the following information. The views expressed in this publication are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Commission. Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) Certain mobile telephone operators do not allow access to 00 800 numbers or these calls may be billed. More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://europa.eu). Cataloguing data can be found at the end of this publication. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2017 Print ISBN 978-92-79-65645-3 ISSN 1018-5593 doi:10.2777/699758 KI-NA-28-457-EN-C PDF ISBN 978-92-79-65646-0 ISSN 1831-9424 doi:10.2777/052290 KI-NA-28-457-EN-N © European Union, 2017 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 FINAL SUMMARY .......................................................................................................... 5 1.1 WP 1: Preliminary investigations required for the development of solutions for resource efficiency ....................................................................................................................... 5 1.2 WP 2: Water management ................................................................................... 7 1.3 WP 3: Waste minimization ................................................................................... 7 1.4 WP 4: Integrated process optimization .................................................................. 9 1.5 WP 5: Implementation and assessment of Process Integration solutions for resource efficiency ....................................................................................................................... 11 1.6 WP 6: Coordination and Reporting ....................................................................... 12 2 SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL DESCRIPTION OF THE RESULTS ......................................... 15 2.1 Objectives of the project .................................................................................... 15 2.2 Description of activities and discussion ................................................................. 15 2.2.1 WP 1: Preliminary investigations required for the development of solutions for resource efficiency ...................................................................................................... 15 2.2.2 WP 2: Water management ........................................................................... 34 2.2.3 WP 3: Waste minimization ........................................................................... 52 2.2.4 WP 4: Integrated process optimization .......................................................... 61 2.2.5 WP 5: Implementation and assessment of Process Integration solutions for resource efficiency ...................................................................................................... 74 2.3 Conclusions ...................................................................................................... 80 2.4 Exploitation and impact of the research results ..................................................... 80 2.4.1 Publications / conference presentations resulting from the project .................... 80 3 LIST OF FIGURES ....................................................................................................... 82 4 LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................ 84 5 LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................... 86 6 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................. 88 7 APPENDIX A - Benchmarking documents - D1.4 ............................................................. 90 7.1 Benchmarking on water, by-products and waste ........................................................... 90 7.2 By-products and waste benchmarking ......................................................................... 98 8 Appendix B - Internal Process Constraints Tables ......................................................... 102 9 Appendix C - Water treatment Process models ............................................................ 106 10 Appendix D – List of potential solutions for water and energy efficiency (D2.1) ................ 118 11 Appendix E - Case studies on BF gas wash system ....................................................... 120 12 Appendix F – List of potential solutions for waste minimization (D3.1) ............................ 126 13 Appendix G - By - products and waste treatment models .............................................. 128 14 APPENDIX H - Holistic simulation models for MOO (D4.1) .............................................. 138 14.1 Holistic simulation models - water ..................................................................... 138 14.2 Holistic simulation models - by-products and wastes ............................................ 154 15 APPENDIX I - Site-specific PI-based solutions for resource efficiency (D4.2) .................... 160 15.1 PI-based solutions - water ................................................................................ 160 15.1.1 CASE STUDY No1: reuse of CCO1 blow down water for off-gas cleaning of BOF1 ... .............................................................................................................. 160 15.1.2 CASE STUDY No2: reuse of blow down water from CCO2/3/4 for the off-gas cleaning of the BOF2 ................................................................................................. 166 15.1.3 CASE STUDY No3: reuse of blow down water from RIV1 in TUL1 .................... 170 15.1.4 CASE STUDY No4: contaminants reduction and water reuse of coke-making area wastewater .............................................................................................................. 176 15.1.5 CASE STUDY No 5: Lagoon 1 Water Reuse in BF Gas Wash Systems ............... 178 15.1.6 CASE STUDY No 6: Pond A Water Reuse in BF Gas Wash Systems .................. 182 15.1.7 CASE STUDY No 7: Recycling of BF GW HC overflow water with suitable treatment .............................................................................................................. 184 15.1.8 CASE STUDY No 8: HPM-Ancholme System Water Recovery & Control ............ 192 15.1.9 CASE STUDY No 9: Efficient usage of spray-on water used at the CC at SSAB in Luleå .............................................................................................................. 196 15.1.10 CASE STUDY No 10: BF gas treatment system at SSAB in Luleå ..................... 198 15.2 PI-based solutions – by products and wastes ...................................................... 202 15.2.1 CASE STUDY No2: Optimization of the reuse of by-products or wastes ............ 208 15.2.2 CASE STUDY No3: reuse of sludge in briquette production ............................. 212 15.2.3 CASE STUDY No4: material recirculation at SSAB Luleå ................................. 214 16 APPENDIX L - Divulgation material and guidelines for analysing, developing and testing process integration solutions for the steel industry (D4.4) .................................................... 218 3 17 APPENDIX M – Other deliverables from WP4 ................................................................ 228 17.1 D4.3 Tools for total site analysis for testing process integration solutions ............... 228 17.2 D4.5 Training course on the tools for total site analysis devoted to engineers and process operators with guidelines for customization .......................................................... 228 18 APPENDIX
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Towards Competitive and Clean European Steel
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 5.5.2021 SWD(2021) 353 final COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Towards competitive and clean European steel Accompanying the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions Updating the 2020 New Industrial Strategy: Building a stronger Single Market for Europe's recovery {COM(2021) 350 final} - {SWD(2021) 351 final} - {SWD(2021) 352 final} EN EN COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Towards competitive and clean European steel Accompanying the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions Updating the 2020 New Industrial Strategy: Building a stronger Single Market for Europe's recovery Contents 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 2 2. The steel industry in Europe and globally .......................................................................... 3 3. The green and digital transition challenge .......................................................................... 7 4. The EU toolbox - towards green, digital and resilient EU steel industry ......................... 12 4.1 Funding and budget programmes .............................................................................. 12 4.1.1 The Recovery and Resilience Facility ........................................................................ 12
    [Show full text]
  • Society, Materials, and the Environment: the Case of Steel
    metals Review Society, Materials, and the Environment: The Case of Steel Jean-Pierre Birat IF Steelman, Moselle, 57280 Semécourt, France; [email protected]; Tel.: +333-8751-1117 Received: 1 February 2020; Accepted: 25 February 2020; Published: 2 March 2020 Abstract: This paper reviews the relationship between the production of steel and the environment as it stands today. It deals with raw material issues (availability, scarcity), energy resources, and generation of by-products, i.e., the circular economy, the anthropogenic iron mine, and the energy transition. The paper also deals with emissions to air (dust, Particulate Matter, heavy metals, Persistant Organics Pollutants), water, and soil, i.e., with toxicity, ecotoxicity, epidemiology, and health issues, but also greenhouse gas emissions, i.e., climate change. The loss of biodiversity is also mentioned. All these topics are analyzed with historical hindsight and the present understanding of their physics and chemistry is discussed, stressing areas where knowledge is still lacking. In the face of all these issues, technological solutions were sought to alleviate their effects: many areas are presently satisfactorily handled (the circular economy—a historical’ practice in the case of steel, energy conservation, air/water/soil emissions) and in line with present environmental regulations; on the other hand, there are important hanging issues, such as the generation of mine tailings (and tailings dam failures), the emissions of greenhouse gases (the steel industry plans to become carbon-neutral by 2050, at least in the EU), and the emission of fine PM, which WHO correlates with premature deaths. Moreover, present regulatory levels of emissions will necessarily become much stricter.
    [Show full text]
  • Life Cycle Assessment of Steel Produced in an Italian Integrated Steel Mill
    sustainability Article Life Cycle Assessment of Steel Produced in an Italian Integrated Steel Mill Pietro A. Renzulli *, Bruno Notarnicola, Giuseppe Tassielli, Gabriella Arcese and Rosa Di Capua Ionian Department of Law, Economics and Environment, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Via Lago Maggiore angolo via Ancona, 74121 Taranto, Italy; [email protected] (B.N.); [email protected] (G.T.); [email protected] (G.A.); [email protected] (R.D.C.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-099-7723011 Academic Editors: Alessandro Ruggieri, Samuel Petros Sebhatu and Zenon Foltynowicz Received: 15 June 2016; Accepted: 22 July 2016; Published: 28 July 2016 Abstract: The purpose of this work is to carry out an accurate and extensive environmental analysis of the steel production occurring in in the largest integrated EU steel mill, located in the city of Taranto in southern Italy. The end goal is that of highlighting the steelworks’ main hot spots and identifying potential options for environmental improvement. The development for such an analysis is based on a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of steel production with a cradle to casting plant gate approach that covers the stages from raw material extraction to solid steel slab production. The inventory results have highlighted the large solid waste production, especially in terms of slag, which could be reused in other industries as secondary raw materials. Other reuses, in accordance with the circular economy paradigm, could encompass the energy waste involved in the steelmaking process. The most burdening lifecycle phases are the ones linked to blast furnace and coke oven operations.
    [Show full text]
  • Metals Magazine Innovation and Technology for the Metals Industry
    Issue 03 | November 2014 Metals Magazine Innovation and technology for the metals industry Tapping the Hearth Of Innovation World’s Largest HBI Plant under Construction in Texas Five Arvedi ESP Lines for China Mechatronics – A Key Factor for Optimized Plant Performance On course to a bright future. Innovation Publisher: Siemens VAI Metals Technologies GmbH · Metals Magazine is published quarterly. The real challenge is not Turmstrasse 44 · 4031 Linz, Austria © 2014 by Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Metals Magazine Team: Dr. Lawrence Gould, Managing Editor; Munich and Berlin. to create something new, Alexander Chavez, Freelance Editor ([email protected]); All rights reserved by the publisher. Allison Chisolm, Freelance Editor ([email protected]); List of registered products: Monika Gollasch, Art Director, Agentur Feedback; ChatterBlock, Connect & Cast, COREX, CTC Caster Technology Consulting, Tina Putzmann-Thoms, Graphic Designer, Agentur Feedback DSR, DYNACS, DynaGap SoftReduction, FAPLAC, FINEX, Gimbal Top, idRHa+, but to create something Publishing house: Agentur Feedback, Munich, IMGS, IT4Metals, KL, KLX, LIQUIROB, LOMAS, MEROS, MORGOIL, MORSHOR, www.agentur-feedback.de NO-TWIST, PLANICIM, SIAS, Si-Filter, SIMELT, SIMETAL, Simetal EAF FAST DRI, Publication date: November 2014 Simetal EAF Quantum, Simetal ­­Gimbal Top, SIMETAL SILOC, SIROLL, SIROLL extraordinary. ChatterBlock, SMART, SmartCrown, SR SERIES, STELMOR, TCOptimizer/ Circulation: 10,000 TCOPTIMIZER, WinLink, X-HI, Xline are registered trademarks of Siemens
    [Show full text]
  • PPT Engineeringcompany Has Been Designing and Developing The
    METALLURGY PT Engineering company has been designing and developing the program of electro-hydraulic systems Pin metallurgy ever since 1976, practically since its founding. Since then, until the present day, the company has been constantly improving its design solutions in order to bring them into line with the latest requirements of technology, quality and reliability. Manufacturing of electro-hydraulic systems for process equipment for production of coke in metallurgical plants is the most important segment of PPT Engineering’s presence in metallurgy. Electro-hydraulic systems for coke machines are designed to provide sequential movement of mechanisms on pertaining machines during one work cycle on a coke battery. The task is accurate positioning of cylinders as actuation elements of mechanisms, which are designed for large external loads. The specific feature of electro-hydraulic systems for coke equipment is 20 to 25 individual actuation systems on one machine with central hydraulic suplly, whereby the desired flow and pressure, being the basic parameters of actuation systems, are provided for each mechanism. Electro-hydraulic systems are installed in the following plants: • In cold and hot rolling mills for production and transport of sheet metal, profiles, wire, rods, beams, pipes, elbows etc. (furnaces, traction benches for pipes, winders, shears, presses...) • For blast furnace serving (drilling machine, manipulator and hydrostatic clay gun) • For serving in coke ovens (dosing coaches, coke pusher cars, door extractors, coke guide cars and coke quenching cars and locomotive for hauling wagons for coke quenching) Some of the most importand references are: • Manufacturing of hydraulic blocks for Dave McKoy company, for the requirements of Železara (Ironworks) Smederevo • Manufacturing of complete hydraulic system for roll stand no.
    [Show full text]
  • Riduzione Diretta Use of Dri/HBI in Ironmaking and Steelmaking Furnaces
    Riduzione diretta use of drI/HBI in ironmaking and steelmaking furnaces c. di cecca, S. Barella, c. Mapelli, A. F. ciuffini, A. Gruttadauria, d. Mombelli, E. Bondi The iron and steel production processes are characterized by a considerable environmental impact. The reduction of this impact, in particular emissions, is the target of modern society; this goal can be achieved through process optimization. The two main production processes, the blast furnace one and the one from electric arc furnace, are of different specificities and therefore different levers are present in order to decrease the amount of pollutants in the atmosphere. The adoption of pre reduced iron charge for these processes seems to be a good operating practice. A further reduction of pollutants linked to the coke oven batteries can be carried out thanks to the reduction of loaded cast iron within the converter. The decrease of the hot charge means that a lower amount of coal is consequently required. The electrical cycle, due to its structure, has a lower environmental impact, but the maximization of the process yield is a desirable objective for the purpose of a reduction of the environmental impact and economic optimization of such a steel cycle. The direct-reduced iron (DRI), due to its operative flexibility, is a suitable element to achieve this target. KEywordS: DIRECT REDuCED IRON - Hot BRIquETTED IRON - BlAST Furnace - BASIC OxygEN Furnace - ElECTRIC ARC Furnace IntroductIon monoxide (reducing gas) in a vertical furnace which constitutes The steel production is one of the most important industrial the reduction reactor and a “heat recovery unit” (2) (3).
    [Show full text]
  • Post 4Q 2019 Roadshow Presentation
    Post 4Q 2019 Roadshow Presentation February 2020 Disclaimer Forward-Looking Statements This document may contain forward-looking information and statements about ArcelorMittal and its subsidiaries. These statements include financial projections and estimates and their underlying assumptions, statements regarding plans, objectives and expectations with respect to future operations, products and services, and statements regarding future performance. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the words “believe”, “expect”, “anticipate”, “target” or similar expressions. Although ArcelorMittal’s management believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, investors and holders of ArcelorMittal’s securities are cautioned that forward-looking information and statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, many of which are difficult to predict and generally beyond the control of ArcelorMittal, that could cause actual results and developments to differ materially and adversely from those expressed in, or implied or projected by, the forward-looking information and statements. These risks and uncertainties include those discussed or identified in the filings with the Luxembourg Stock Market Authority for the Financial Markets (Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier) and the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) made or to be made by ArcelorMittal, including ArcelorMittal’s latest Annual Report on Form 20-F on file with the SEC. ArcelorMittal undertakes no obligation to publicly update its forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. Non-GAAP/Alternative Performance Measures This document includes supplemental financial measures that are or may be non-GAAP financial/alternative performance measures, as defined in the rules of the SEC or the guidelines of the European Securities and Market Authority (ESMA).
    [Show full text]
  • DECLASSIFIED Hy 31734
    . , . ._--- ,' -I Operated for the Atomic Energy commission kY the Oeneral Electric Company under Contract # W-31-109q-S2 THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN SCANNED THIS DOCUMENT 1s puBLlcLy WFk A 'J A I L A 8 L E AND IS STORED ON THE OPTICAL DISK DRIVE I I I Date I I COPY- DISTRIBUTION 1 F. K. McCune - Tellow Copy 2 Km Hm udm 3 & Id. B. Johnson 5 6 7-8 Atomic kergy Co~dssion Hanford Operation8 Office Attention8 DmF. %an, Manager 9 - AtopdC bmCOdSSi~ Word Qmrations Office Attentionr J. J. Joyce 10 . Atomic Energy Commission Forr B. PIm Fry, AEC, Washington 700 Pile 300 File DECLASSIFIED Hy 31734 -0fmlmae 0 0 0 0 . 0 C-ladC-2 Per~-lMstribUt%a~r 0 0 0 0 0 D-1 l¶anufacturingDapmnt .................... E-1 through E-5 mthly Operptine R0~a2.t 0 0 0 Ea01 through Ea-7 &tal Pmparatlon Section ................. Eb-1 through Eb-8 Reactor Section ...................... Ec-1 through Ec-& mtiOMSection 0 0 0. 0 Ed01 through Ed-17 Eugineering Dspartment .......... ............F-lthroughF-S Wb-ring stration. ..................Pa4 and Fa-2 me Technology- ...................... Fb-1 through Fb-a S.paraticw8 Technology .................. Fc-1 through Fc-22 . Applied Reaearch ..................... Fd-1 through Fd-17 Fuel Twhnology ......................Fe-1 through Fe-13 h8-0 0 0 rn 0 Ff-2throughFf-15 RoJeat ......................... Fg-2 through Fg-19 Employee and Public Relations Department ............ El through G-& UuplayeeBelations. ................... Qa-1 through Fa=* Public Belatiom. .................... ob-1 through Ob-9 DnionRelations ..................... OC-1 through OCA Salary Administration ................... ....... Gd-1 TechnicalRecruiting ...................... Ge-1 and Ge-2 HealthandSafety.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Introduction Heat Treatment Is a Technological Process, in Which
    ARCHIVES OF METALLURGY AND MATERIALS Volume 54 2009 Issue 3 A. BOKOTA∗ , T. DOMAŃSKI∗∗ MODELLING AND NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF HARDENING PHENOMENA OF TOOLS STEEL ELEMENTS MODELOWANIE I ANALIZA NUMERYCZNA ZJAWISK HARTOWANIA ELEMENTÓW ZE STALI NARZĘDZIOWYCH This research the complex model of hardening of tool steel was shown. Thermal phenomena, phase transformations and mechanical phenomena were taken into considerations. In the modelling of thermal phenomena the heat transfer equations has been solved by Finite Elements Method by Petrov-Galerkin formulations. The possibility of thermal phenomena analysing of feed hardening has been obtained in this way. The diagrams of continuous heating (CHT) and continuous cooling (CCT) of considered steel are used in the model of phase transformations. Phase altered fractions during the continuous heating (austenite) are obtained in the model by formula Johnson-Mehl and Avrami and modified equation Koistinen and Marburger. The fractions ferrite, pearlite or bainite, in the process of cooling, are marked in the model by formula Johnson-Mehl and Avrami. The forming fraction of martensite is identified by Koistinen and Marburger equation and modified Koistinen and Marburger equation. The stresses and strains fields are obtained from solutions by FEM equilibrium equations in rate form. Thermophysical values in the constitutive relations are depended upon both the temperature and the phase content. The Huber-Misses condition with the isotropic strengthening for the creation of plastic strains is used. However the Leblond model to determine transformations plasticity was applied. The numerical analysis of thermal fields, phase fractions, stresses and strain associated deep hardening and superficial hardening of elements made of tool steel were done.
    [Show full text]
  • Iron Recovery from Bauxite Tailings Red Mud by Thermal Reduction with Blast Furnace Sludge
    applied sciences Article Iron Recovery from Bauxite Tailings Red Mud by Thermal Reduction with Blast Furnace Sludge Davide Mombelli * , Silvia Barella , Andrea Gruttadauria and Carlo Mapelli Dipartimento di Meccanica, Politecnico di Milano, via La Masa 1, Milano 20156, Italy; [email protected] (S.B.); [email protected] (A.G.); [email protected] (C.M.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-02-2399-8660 Received: 26 September 2019; Accepted: 9 November 2019; Published: 15 November 2019 Abstract: More than 100 million tons of red mud were produced annually in the world over the short time range from 2011 to 2018. Red mud represents one of the metallurgical by-products more difficult to dispose of due to the high alkalinity (pH 10–13) and storage techniques issues. Up to now, economically viable commercial processes for the recovery and the reuse of these waste were not available. Due to the high content of iron oxide (30–60% wt.) red mud ranks as a potential raw material for the production of iron through a direct route. In this work, a novel process at the laboratory scale to produce iron sponge ( 1300 C) or cast iron (> 1300 C) using blast furnace ≤ ◦ ◦ sludge as a reducing agent is presented. Red mud-reducing agent mixes were reduced in a muffle furnace at 1200, 1300, and 1500 ◦C for 15 min. Pure graphite and blast furnace sludges were used as reducing agents with different equivalent carbon concentrations. The results confirmed the blast furnace sludge as a suitable reducing agent to recover the iron fraction contained in the red mud.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2016 2 Management Report Management Report 3
    Management report 1 Annual Report 2016 2 Management report Management report 3 Table of contents Management Report Company overview ____________________________________________________________________________________________ 4 Business overview _____________________________________________________________________________________________ 5 Disclosures about market risks ___________________________________________________________________________________ 28 Group operational structure _____________________________________________________________________________________ 30 Key transactions and events in 2016 _______________________________________________________________________________ 32 Recent developments __________________________________________________________________________________________ 33 Corporate governance _________________________________________________________________________________________ 33 > Luxembourg takeover law disclosure_____________________________________________________________________________ 59 Additional information __________________________________________________________________________________________ 60 Chief executive officer and chief financial officer’s responsibility statement _______________________________________________ 63 Consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016 ________________________________________________ 64 Consolidated statements of operations ____________________________________________________________________________ 65 Consolidated statements of other
    [Show full text]
  • The Environmental Disaster and Human Rights Violations of the ILVA Steel Plant in Italy 2
    The Environmental Disaster and Human Rights Violations of the ILVA steel plant in Italy April 2018 / N° 711a Cover photo: The picture shows that the ILVA plant is completely embedded in the city of Taranto. © FIDH taBLE OF CONTENTS 1. Preface ............................................................................................................................... 4 2. The history of ILVA’s “unsustainable” development .............................................................. 5 3. ILVA’s impact on health and the environment .................................................................... 10 4. ILVA: human rights violations within the EU ...................................................................... 18 5. Human rights protected under international law ................................................................ 20 5.1 the right to life..................................................................................................................................... 20 5.2 the right to health .............................................................................................................................. 21 5.3 the right to live in a healthy environment ...................................................................................... 22 6. Obligations of the State in relation to industrial activities in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights ......................................................................................................... 26 7. The ILVA case ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]