DECLASSIFIED Hy 31734

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

DECLASSIFIED Hy 31734 . , . ._--- ,' -I Operated for the Atomic Energy commission kY the Oeneral Electric Company under Contract # W-31-109q-S2 THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN SCANNED THIS DOCUMENT 1s puBLlcLy WFk A 'J A I L A 8 L E AND IS STORED ON THE OPTICAL DISK DRIVE I I I Date I I COPY- DISTRIBUTION 1 F. K. McCune - Tellow Copy 2 Km Hm udm 3 & Id. B. Johnson 5 6 7-8 Atomic kergy Co~dssion Hanford Operation8 Office Attention8 DmF. %an, Manager 9 - AtopdC bmCOdSSi~ Word Qmrations Office Attentionr J. J. Joyce 10 . Atomic Energy Commission Forr B. PIm Fry, AEC, Washington 700 Pile 300 File DECLASSIFIED Hy 31734 -0fmlmae 0 0 0 0 . 0 C-ladC-2 Per~-lMstribUt%a~r 0 0 0 0 0 D-1 l¶anufacturingDapmnt .................... E-1 through E-5 mthly Operptine R0~a2.t 0 0 0 Ea01 through Ea-7 &tal Pmparatlon Section ................. Eb-1 through Eb-8 Reactor Section ...................... Ec-1 through Ec-& mtiOMSection 0 0 0. 0 Ed01 through Ed-17 Eugineering Dspartment .......... ............F-lthroughF-S Wb-ring stration. ..................Pa4 and Fa-2 me Technology- ...................... Fb-1 through Fb-a S.paraticw8 Technology .................. Fc-1 through Fc-22 . Applied Reaearch ..................... Fd-1 through Fd-17 Fuel Twhnology ......................Fe-1 through Fe-13 h8-0 0 0 rn 0 Ff-2throughFf-15 RoJeat ......................... Fg-2 through Fg-19 Employee and Public Relations Department ............ El through G-& UuplayeeBelations. ................... Qa-1 through Fa=* Public Belatiom. .................... ob-1 through Ob-9 DnionRelations ..................... OC-1 through OCA Salary Administration ................... ....... Gd-1 TechnicalRecruiting ...................... Ge-1 and Ge-2 HealthandSafety.. ................... of-1 through Gf-IL Community Operations ................... Gg-1 through Gg-33 CommtlnityaealEStats .................. Gh-1 through Gh-a Radiological Sciences Department ................ H-1 through H-16 Financial Dep-d 0 .. 1-1 through 1-24 Plant Auxiliary Operations l)epaz%mnt Plant Protection Section ................. Ja-1 through Ja-28 PurCbSiw adStoms Section 0 0 0 . 0 Jb-1 through Jb-9 Transpartation Section ...................Jc-1 through Jc-4 Electrical Distribution and Telephone Section .......Jd-1 through Jd-5 Operations balysis Section ............... Je-2 through Je-19 DECLASSIFIED production oparatians In the Metal Praparation Section production of nodcharge mpterial for the month y~g96 parcant of forecatst. Lower Wmn forecasted production \1p9 due principally to canrarting sntimly to winch slug production toward the end of the month. The overall c- seld Lor April ~lps83.7 percent. The total rsrctor input plutonium production was 102.9 percent of the official forucast and the output upd 112.3 percent of forecast. P-10 production uas Ii Of LO-* A tatrl of 2L rUptUrW 0Cc-d dhgbril including 20 noduranium slugs, OM "P slug, twa "E? slues, and one 10-66 piece. On 4d 28, Ute Perricr sulfate water troatxwnt prwsss uas changed to the alum- activated silica co8gul&t proteas at B Reactor. All areas are nay using alum- activated silica in the preparation of process uater. The first irradiated J lppterial of the present J-N program was shipped offsite on April 12. The Redox production vas l2b percent of forecast for the month. l" production was 167 percent of the official forecast. lJO3 facility production YM 150 percent of forecast. dll coamnitments for 23b-5 production uem Et uith the exception of un- fabricated buttons vhich mre 99 percent achieved. eetring Technolorn Design of the Hot Sduorka Conversion, U-93-D uas ad-ed to 100 percent campletion during 4rU. Thia does not include the design of the waste self-con- centrator, which upd .dvpnced to 75 pement completion. Detail design of the 300 Area Expansion, CA-D, flos advancad to 90 percent completion. Overall design on Co-558, Reactor Plant Modipicatian for Ipcreosed Production, was advanced to 15-6 percent completion. hranty-e info&, five Claas I and one Class XI radiation incidents were recorded. Personnel and Se~dces No major injuries were mported in Agril. Three sub-major injuries uere repmted. mor injuries increased from 313 to 387. The employee separation rate increased from .52 percent for March to .67 percad for April. On April 1s a bill was presented to Congress for disposal of federally-owned properties at mchland, and studies are being made of the proposed $egislation. i As of April 30 there we= 267 housing applications pending. '. General mer, kmlc Products Division ............F. K. MccUne General mger, WordAtomic Products Operation .......Y. E. Johnson Counsel ............................ .G.C.Butler Muuge+,Finmce ....................... .Dol¶. Johnson I kUgc#r, $mployee and hblic Belatione ............. C. N. Gross Director, BadiolOgical Sciences .................H. M. Parker & Manager, Engineering ....................... A. B. Greninger Manager, IYarmfactu.rtng ..................... J. E. Maider Manager, Plant Auxiliary Operations ..............H. D. Mddel DECLASSIFIED 17 7k 7t msien 17k u9 137 prohe* 268 170 191 Techsical Section 0-M 10 2 2 rrpplied Reaiearah 122 52 55 sepurdion8 ?&logy la 39 38 p+le Techaology 1Cn 66 63 Fuel Technology 71 71 60 Advance Technology u J 1 ~ufpcturingDeparrrplbn t General =rs 7 7 €&u&or 245 1 077 1063 sepe3.rtions a 12as 1 228 Metal prrpurtiorr 96 rs9 ws mant ope~UM Dew c 0eXlOZ-d. 1 1 1 Eltc. Dist. & Telspbom 30 139 139 '&amporktiLon u wr2 4&3 pprchaaing at Stoma 52 226 a22 mant ProtectLon General 1 1 1 Pa-1 & secwity 59 wr2 Lt9 sirfety & h 30 107 108 Office Sendces 20 281 281 Mndniak?atfoa Main. serdce y3 52 53 Operations hlalmi8. Iro 65 67 Fxnancial Dep€K?tment Financial General 6 k 2 Costs & Budge- a7 101 98 General & Personnel Accounting 18 u1 U8 Propellt;y Accotmtdng 15 40 40 Audits & procedares 18 3 3 SF pcccountability 5 22 2%e) Employee & Public Relations Dept. Community General - - 1 ConxnuniQ Operations 69 149 167 Red &tat6 Services 22 164 162 hdth & safety SL a3 a4 Management 7 3 2 Salary &&histration 5 6 5 Employee Belatione a 43 4 Public Relations L 22 P Union Relations 8 8 8 Technical Personnel Staff \ k 7 7 Others m 46 k7 (a- Included in Mministratiw Practices Department at 3/31/54. In addition nine other employees included above as Financial Department were in Mdnistrative kactices Department at 3/31/54. Gl 3 u3 ld 61 60 37 3s z 1 , C-2 . -I=' ' 'I' 1 i u .- __... .). 1 .. i , .. .. , , -, . .* _.... ., -.. ,* ... -, ..* *.. The net probetian of acrceptabla slugs was 241 tons whlch was 96 percent of the officisl forecast. Ihe lavler than foreca6ted prodnctian ass due principally to converting extirely to four-inch slug prodnetion tovard the end of the morrth. Bm lover of four-inch material combinad vlth the low yields resulted in mdnced production rates. A total of 223 tapa was canned as elght-inch slugs aud the mmmhing 18 tons as four-inch meterial- 'Ehe aanning yields were 85.3 percent and 65 percent, respectidy. me over4 canning field was 83.7 per- cent- The inprorcrent in the elgh%-iikh canning field resulted from a reduetion in the poor bond tspe rejeats. Ima four-inch Seld on the other hand was adversely affected by lnaxmwed poor bond typa rejeete vhich occurred in large PlIlljbex-8 with the defeote &Owlng as d pinholes in the aide of the veld. The cause has not yet been &terndned, '&e canning of enriched uranium alloy fuel dugs contirmed with 9,582 slugs being cold canned vith a field of 75 percent. A total of ll,lOO lithium alloy target slugs was cold canned with a yield of 79 percent, A canuhg yield of 56 percent vas realized on the hot press canning of 391 ex- truded fuel slugs dethe month, Poor banding vas the major reject cause. Ihe tatd reactor hput plutanitnn production was 102.9 percent of the official forecast, and the outppt was U,3percent of forecast. The aver-dl reactor operating efficiency for the month was 78.8 percent. 'Ihe low operating efficiency was due principally to the outages associated with 24 ruptured slugs. Ihe established nmximm operating levels (excluding enrichment burnout) were in- creased a total of 64 MU dnring Ape including 15 at the B Reactor, 25 (PU and P-10) at the DR Reactor and 24 at the H Reactor. At the B Reactor the increase was attributed to improved flattening; at the DR Reactor to a revision of exit water temperature permissible limits (now based on average of highest ten tubes rather than the highest individual tube temperature); at the H Reactor to in- creased helium concentrations up to 50 percent as permitted by the production test on irrsdiation of thorium and U-235 alloy slugs for U-233 production. me program for discharging the normal irradiated uranium metal, at two concentra- tions as originally planned, continued with a total of 94 tons of metal being dis- charged at the low and 189 tons at the higher concentrations. Ihe P-10 prog~amat DE Reactor continued dralng 4- vith the charging of an sdditional 327 J-B tubes as part of the second P-10 irradfstion cycle. The P-10 program at C Reactor contipuhd drrring april without incidcat, and wlthout the cbargine of any Sdditionsl tubes. 'Ihe Irradiation of 12 J-Q (thorium) tubes, charged at H Reactor in March on a production test basis to Investigate the feasibility of large scale thorium inadistian, contirmed vith no difficulties during April. A t&UJ Of 24 m-8 OC-d @d mcludirrg 2O 90- tpsniUm Slugs, one J slug, two (enriched uxmimn) slugs a& one lo66 (Mum) piece. Of the umaium pieces, tbirtear were eight-inch and seven the fora-inch materid. A total of 470 h0f;trS of uutage thm resulted from the *urea.
Recommended publications
  • Towards Competitive and Clean European Steel
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 5.5.2021 SWD(2021) 353 final COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Towards competitive and clean European steel Accompanying the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions Updating the 2020 New Industrial Strategy: Building a stronger Single Market for Europe's recovery {COM(2021) 350 final} - {SWD(2021) 351 final} - {SWD(2021) 352 final} EN EN COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Towards competitive and clean European steel Accompanying the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions Updating the 2020 New Industrial Strategy: Building a stronger Single Market for Europe's recovery Contents 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 2 2. The steel industry in Europe and globally .......................................................................... 3 3. The green and digital transition challenge .......................................................................... 7 4. The EU toolbox - towards green, digital and resilient EU steel industry ......................... 12 4.1 Funding and budget programmes .............................................................................. 12 4.1.1 The Recovery and Resilience Facility ........................................................................ 12
    [Show full text]
  • Society, Materials, and the Environment: the Case of Steel
    metals Review Society, Materials, and the Environment: The Case of Steel Jean-Pierre Birat IF Steelman, Moselle, 57280 Semécourt, France; [email protected]; Tel.: +333-8751-1117 Received: 1 February 2020; Accepted: 25 February 2020; Published: 2 March 2020 Abstract: This paper reviews the relationship between the production of steel and the environment as it stands today. It deals with raw material issues (availability, scarcity), energy resources, and generation of by-products, i.e., the circular economy, the anthropogenic iron mine, and the energy transition. The paper also deals with emissions to air (dust, Particulate Matter, heavy metals, Persistant Organics Pollutants), water, and soil, i.e., with toxicity, ecotoxicity, epidemiology, and health issues, but also greenhouse gas emissions, i.e., climate change. The loss of biodiversity is also mentioned. All these topics are analyzed with historical hindsight and the present understanding of their physics and chemistry is discussed, stressing areas where knowledge is still lacking. In the face of all these issues, technological solutions were sought to alleviate their effects: many areas are presently satisfactorily handled (the circular economy—a historical’ practice in the case of steel, energy conservation, air/water/soil emissions) and in line with present environmental regulations; on the other hand, there are important hanging issues, such as the generation of mine tailings (and tailings dam failures), the emissions of greenhouse gases (the steel industry plans to become carbon-neutral by 2050, at least in the EU), and the emission of fine PM, which WHO correlates with premature deaths. Moreover, present regulatory levels of emissions will necessarily become much stricter.
    [Show full text]
  • Life Cycle Assessment of Steel Produced in an Italian Integrated Steel Mill
    sustainability Article Life Cycle Assessment of Steel Produced in an Italian Integrated Steel Mill Pietro A. Renzulli *, Bruno Notarnicola, Giuseppe Tassielli, Gabriella Arcese and Rosa Di Capua Ionian Department of Law, Economics and Environment, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Via Lago Maggiore angolo via Ancona, 74121 Taranto, Italy; [email protected] (B.N.); [email protected] (G.T.); [email protected] (G.A.); [email protected] (R.D.C.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-099-7723011 Academic Editors: Alessandro Ruggieri, Samuel Petros Sebhatu and Zenon Foltynowicz Received: 15 June 2016; Accepted: 22 July 2016; Published: 28 July 2016 Abstract: The purpose of this work is to carry out an accurate and extensive environmental analysis of the steel production occurring in in the largest integrated EU steel mill, located in the city of Taranto in southern Italy. The end goal is that of highlighting the steelworks’ main hot spots and identifying potential options for environmental improvement. The development for such an analysis is based on a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of steel production with a cradle to casting plant gate approach that covers the stages from raw material extraction to solid steel slab production. The inventory results have highlighted the large solid waste production, especially in terms of slag, which could be reused in other industries as secondary raw materials. Other reuses, in accordance with the circular economy paradigm, could encompass the energy waste involved in the steelmaking process. The most burdening lifecycle phases are the ones linked to blast furnace and coke oven operations.
    [Show full text]
  • Metals Magazine Innovation and Technology for the Metals Industry
    Issue 03 | November 2014 Metals Magazine Innovation and technology for the metals industry Tapping the Hearth Of Innovation World’s Largest HBI Plant under Construction in Texas Five Arvedi ESP Lines for China Mechatronics – A Key Factor for Optimized Plant Performance On course to a bright future. Innovation Publisher: Siemens VAI Metals Technologies GmbH · Metals Magazine is published quarterly. The real challenge is not Turmstrasse 44 · 4031 Linz, Austria © 2014 by Siemens Aktiengesellschaft Metals Magazine Team: Dr. Lawrence Gould, Managing Editor; Munich and Berlin. to create something new, Alexander Chavez, Freelance Editor ([email protected]); All rights reserved by the publisher. Allison Chisolm, Freelance Editor ([email protected]); List of registered products: Monika Gollasch, Art Director, Agentur Feedback; ChatterBlock, Connect & Cast, COREX, CTC Caster Technology Consulting, Tina Putzmann-Thoms, Graphic Designer, Agentur Feedback DSR, DYNACS, DynaGap SoftReduction, FAPLAC, FINEX, Gimbal Top, idRHa+, but to create something Publishing house: Agentur Feedback, Munich, IMGS, IT4Metals, KL, KLX, LIQUIROB, LOMAS, MEROS, MORGOIL, MORSHOR, www.agentur-feedback.de NO-TWIST, PLANICIM, SIAS, Si-Filter, SIMELT, SIMETAL, Simetal EAF FAST DRI, Publication date: November 2014 Simetal EAF Quantum, Simetal ­­Gimbal Top, SIMETAL SILOC, SIROLL, SIROLL extraordinary. ChatterBlock, SMART, SmartCrown, SR SERIES, STELMOR, TCOptimizer/ Circulation: 10,000 TCOPTIMIZER, WinLink, X-HI, Xline are registered trademarks of Siemens
    [Show full text]
  • PPT Engineeringcompany Has Been Designing and Developing The
    METALLURGY PT Engineering company has been designing and developing the program of electro-hydraulic systems Pin metallurgy ever since 1976, practically since its founding. Since then, until the present day, the company has been constantly improving its design solutions in order to bring them into line with the latest requirements of technology, quality and reliability. Manufacturing of electro-hydraulic systems for process equipment for production of coke in metallurgical plants is the most important segment of PPT Engineering’s presence in metallurgy. Electro-hydraulic systems for coke machines are designed to provide sequential movement of mechanisms on pertaining machines during one work cycle on a coke battery. The task is accurate positioning of cylinders as actuation elements of mechanisms, which are designed for large external loads. The specific feature of electro-hydraulic systems for coke equipment is 20 to 25 individual actuation systems on one machine with central hydraulic suplly, whereby the desired flow and pressure, being the basic parameters of actuation systems, are provided for each mechanism. Electro-hydraulic systems are installed in the following plants: • In cold and hot rolling mills for production and transport of sheet metal, profiles, wire, rods, beams, pipes, elbows etc. (furnaces, traction benches for pipes, winders, shears, presses...) • For blast furnace serving (drilling machine, manipulator and hydrostatic clay gun) • For serving in coke ovens (dosing coaches, coke pusher cars, door extractors, coke guide cars and coke quenching cars and locomotive for hauling wagons for coke quenching) Some of the most importand references are: • Manufacturing of hydraulic blocks for Dave McKoy company, for the requirements of Železara (Ironworks) Smederevo • Manufacturing of complete hydraulic system for roll stand no.
    [Show full text]
  • Riduzione Diretta Use of Dri/HBI in Ironmaking and Steelmaking Furnaces
    Riduzione diretta use of drI/HBI in ironmaking and steelmaking furnaces c. di cecca, S. Barella, c. Mapelli, A. F. ciuffini, A. Gruttadauria, d. Mombelli, E. Bondi The iron and steel production processes are characterized by a considerable environmental impact. The reduction of this impact, in particular emissions, is the target of modern society; this goal can be achieved through process optimization. The two main production processes, the blast furnace one and the one from electric arc furnace, are of different specificities and therefore different levers are present in order to decrease the amount of pollutants in the atmosphere. The adoption of pre reduced iron charge for these processes seems to be a good operating practice. A further reduction of pollutants linked to the coke oven batteries can be carried out thanks to the reduction of loaded cast iron within the converter. The decrease of the hot charge means that a lower amount of coal is consequently required. The electrical cycle, due to its structure, has a lower environmental impact, but the maximization of the process yield is a desirable objective for the purpose of a reduction of the environmental impact and economic optimization of such a steel cycle. The direct-reduced iron (DRI), due to its operative flexibility, is a suitable element to achieve this target. KEywordS: DIRECT REDuCED IRON - Hot BRIquETTED IRON - BlAST Furnace - BASIC OxygEN Furnace - ElECTRIC ARC Furnace IntroductIon monoxide (reducing gas) in a vertical furnace which constitutes The steel production is one of the most important industrial the reduction reactor and a “heat recovery unit” (2) (3).
    [Show full text]
  • Post 4Q 2019 Roadshow Presentation
    Post 4Q 2019 Roadshow Presentation February 2020 Disclaimer Forward-Looking Statements This document may contain forward-looking information and statements about ArcelorMittal and its subsidiaries. These statements include financial projections and estimates and their underlying assumptions, statements regarding plans, objectives and expectations with respect to future operations, products and services, and statements regarding future performance. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the words “believe”, “expect”, “anticipate”, “target” or similar expressions. Although ArcelorMittal’s management believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, investors and holders of ArcelorMittal’s securities are cautioned that forward-looking information and statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, many of which are difficult to predict and generally beyond the control of ArcelorMittal, that could cause actual results and developments to differ materially and adversely from those expressed in, or implied or projected by, the forward-looking information and statements. These risks and uncertainties include those discussed or identified in the filings with the Luxembourg Stock Market Authority for the Financial Markets (Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier) and the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) made or to be made by ArcelorMittal, including ArcelorMittal’s latest Annual Report on Form 20-F on file with the SEC. ArcelorMittal undertakes no obligation to publicly update its forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. Non-GAAP/Alternative Performance Measures This document includes supplemental financial measures that are or may be non-GAAP financial/alternative performance measures, as defined in the rules of the SEC or the guidelines of the European Securities and Market Authority (ESMA).
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Introduction Heat Treatment Is a Technological Process, in Which
    ARCHIVES OF METALLURGY AND MATERIALS Volume 54 2009 Issue 3 A. BOKOTA∗ , T. DOMAŃSKI∗∗ MODELLING AND NUMERICAL ANALYSIS OF HARDENING PHENOMENA OF TOOLS STEEL ELEMENTS MODELOWANIE I ANALIZA NUMERYCZNA ZJAWISK HARTOWANIA ELEMENTÓW ZE STALI NARZĘDZIOWYCH This research the complex model of hardening of tool steel was shown. Thermal phenomena, phase transformations and mechanical phenomena were taken into considerations. In the modelling of thermal phenomena the heat transfer equations has been solved by Finite Elements Method by Petrov-Galerkin formulations. The possibility of thermal phenomena analysing of feed hardening has been obtained in this way. The diagrams of continuous heating (CHT) and continuous cooling (CCT) of considered steel are used in the model of phase transformations. Phase altered fractions during the continuous heating (austenite) are obtained in the model by formula Johnson-Mehl and Avrami and modified equation Koistinen and Marburger. The fractions ferrite, pearlite or bainite, in the process of cooling, are marked in the model by formula Johnson-Mehl and Avrami. The forming fraction of martensite is identified by Koistinen and Marburger equation and modified Koistinen and Marburger equation. The stresses and strains fields are obtained from solutions by FEM equilibrium equations in rate form. Thermophysical values in the constitutive relations are depended upon both the temperature and the phase content. The Huber-Misses condition with the isotropic strengthening for the creation of plastic strains is used. However the Leblond model to determine transformations plasticity was applied. The numerical analysis of thermal fields, phase fractions, stresses and strain associated deep hardening and superficial hardening of elements made of tool steel were done.
    [Show full text]
  • Iron Recovery from Bauxite Tailings Red Mud by Thermal Reduction with Blast Furnace Sludge
    applied sciences Article Iron Recovery from Bauxite Tailings Red Mud by Thermal Reduction with Blast Furnace Sludge Davide Mombelli * , Silvia Barella , Andrea Gruttadauria and Carlo Mapelli Dipartimento di Meccanica, Politecnico di Milano, via La Masa 1, Milano 20156, Italy; [email protected] (S.B.); [email protected] (A.G.); [email protected] (C.M.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-02-2399-8660 Received: 26 September 2019; Accepted: 9 November 2019; Published: 15 November 2019 Abstract: More than 100 million tons of red mud were produced annually in the world over the short time range from 2011 to 2018. Red mud represents one of the metallurgical by-products more difficult to dispose of due to the high alkalinity (pH 10–13) and storage techniques issues. Up to now, economically viable commercial processes for the recovery and the reuse of these waste were not available. Due to the high content of iron oxide (30–60% wt.) red mud ranks as a potential raw material for the production of iron through a direct route. In this work, a novel process at the laboratory scale to produce iron sponge ( 1300 C) or cast iron (> 1300 C) using blast furnace ≤ ◦ ◦ sludge as a reducing agent is presented. Red mud-reducing agent mixes were reduced in a muffle furnace at 1200, 1300, and 1500 ◦C for 15 min. Pure graphite and blast furnace sludges were used as reducing agents with different equivalent carbon concentrations. The results confirmed the blast furnace sludge as a suitable reducing agent to recover the iron fraction contained in the red mud.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2016 2 Management Report Management Report 3
    Management report 1 Annual Report 2016 2 Management report Management report 3 Table of contents Management Report Company overview ____________________________________________________________________________________________ 4 Business overview _____________________________________________________________________________________________ 5 Disclosures about market risks ___________________________________________________________________________________ 28 Group operational structure _____________________________________________________________________________________ 30 Key transactions and events in 2016 _______________________________________________________________________________ 32 Recent developments __________________________________________________________________________________________ 33 Corporate governance _________________________________________________________________________________________ 33 > Luxembourg takeover law disclosure_____________________________________________________________________________ 59 Additional information __________________________________________________________________________________________ 60 Chief executive officer and chief financial officer’s responsibility statement _______________________________________________ 63 Consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016 ________________________________________________ 64 Consolidated statements of operations ____________________________________________________________________________ 65 Consolidated statements of other
    [Show full text]
  • The Environmental Disaster and Human Rights Violations of the ILVA Steel Plant in Italy 2
    The Environmental Disaster and Human Rights Violations of the ILVA steel plant in Italy April 2018 / N° 711a Cover photo: The picture shows that the ILVA plant is completely embedded in the city of Taranto. © FIDH taBLE OF CONTENTS 1. Preface ............................................................................................................................... 4 2. The history of ILVA’s “unsustainable” development .............................................................. 5 3. ILVA’s impact on health and the environment .................................................................... 10 4. ILVA: human rights violations within the EU ...................................................................... 18 5. Human rights protected under international law ................................................................ 20 5.1 the right to life..................................................................................................................................... 20 5.2 the right to health .............................................................................................................................. 21 5.3 the right to live in a healthy environment ...................................................................................... 22 6. Obligations of the State in relation to industrial activities in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights ......................................................................................................... 26 7. The ILVA case ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Efficient Use of Resources in Steel Plant Through Process Integration (Reffiplant) in Steel Plant Through Process Integration (Reffiplant) EUR 28457
    ISSN 1831-9424 (PDF) ISSN 1018-5593 (Printed) EU Efficient use of resources Efficient use of resources in steel plant through process integration (Reffiplant) in steel plant through process integration (Reffiplant) EUR 28457 EUR Research and Innovation EUR 28457 EN EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General for Research and Innovation Directorate D — Industrial Technologies Unit D.4 — Coal and Steel E-mail: [email protected] [email protected] Contact: RFCS Publications European Commission B-1049 Brussels European Commission Research Fund for Coal and Steel Efficient use of resources in steel plant through process integration (Reffiplant) Valentina Colla Scuola Superiore di Studi Universitari e di Perfezionamento Sant’Anna Piazza Martiri della Libertà, 33 IT-56127 Pisa, ITALY Erika Alcamisi, Ismael Matino Scuola Superiore di Studi Universitari e di Perfezionamento Sant'Anna Piazza Martiri della Libertà 33, IT-56127 Pisa, ITALY Lea Romaniello ILVA S.p.A. Viale Certosa 249, IT-20251, Milano, ITALY Mansour Saiepour Tata Steel UK Ltd Millbank 30, GB-SW1P4WY London, UNITED KINGDOM Ida Heintz, Johan Riesbeck, Jonas Zetterholm, Katarina Lundkvist, Mats Brämming Swerea MEFOS AB Arontorpsvagen 1, SE-971 25 Luleå, SWEDEN Anita Wedholm, Katarina Kylefors SSAB EMEA AB SE-613 80 Oxelösund, SWEDEN Yuhang Lou, Kokil Jain, Steve Doyle Process Integration Limited Station House, Stamford New Road, Altrincham, Cheshire WA14 1EP, UNITED KINGDOM Grant Agreement RFSR-CT-2012-00039 1 July 2012 to 31 December 2015 Final report Directorate-General for Research and Innovation 2017 EUR 28457 EN LEGAL NOTICE Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use which might be made of the following information.
    [Show full text]