Annual Meeting of the 21St Century Council
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
APA Newsletter on Asian and Asian-American Philosophers And
NEWSLETTER | The American Philosophical Association Asian and Asian-American Philosophers and Philosophies FALL 2018 VOLUME 18 | NUMBER 1 Prasanta Bandyopadhyay and R. Venkata FROM THE EDITOR Raghavan Prasanta S. Bandyopadhyay Some Critical Remarks on Kisor SUBMISSION GUIDELINES AND Chakrabarti’s Idea of “Observational INFORMATION Credibility” and Its Role in Solving the Problem of Induction BUDDHISM Kisor K. Chakrabarti Madhumita Chattopadhyay Some Thoughts on the Problem of Locating Early Buddhist Logic in Pāli Induction Literature PHILOSOPHY OF LANGUAGE Rafal Stepien AND GRAMMAR Do Good Philosophers Argue? A Buddhist Approach to Philosophy and Philosophy Sanjit Chakraborty Prizes Remnants of Words in Indian Grammar ONTOLOGY, LOGIC, AND APA PANEL ON DIVERSITY EPISTEMOLOGY Ethan Mills Pradeep P. Gokhale Report on an APA Panel: Diversity in Īśvaravāda: A Critique Philosophy Palash Sarkar BOOK REVIEW Cārvākism Redivivus Minds without Fear: Philosophy in the Indian Renaissance Reviewed by Brian A. Hatcher VOLUME 18 | NUMBER 1 FALL 2018 © 2018 BY THE AMERICAN PHILOSOPHICAL ASSOCIATION ISSN 2155-9708 APA NEWSLETTER ON Asian and Asian-American Philosophy and Philosophers PRASANTA BANDYOPADHYAY, EDITOR VOLUME 18 | NUMBER 1 | FALL 2018 opponent equally. He pleads for the need for this sort of FROM THE EDITOR role of humanism to be incorporated into Western analytic philosophy. This incorporation, he contends, has a far- Prasanta S. Bandyopadhyay reaching impact on both private and public lives of human MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY beings where the love of wisdom should go together with care and love for fellow human beings. The fall 2018 issue of the newsletter is animated by the goal of reaching a wider audience. Papers deal with issues SECTION 2: ONTOLOGY, LOGIC, AND mostly from classical Indian philosophy, with the exception EPISTEMOLOGY of a report on the 2018 APA Eastern Division meeting panel on “Diversity in Philosophy” and a review of a book about This is the longest part of this issue. -
APA Pacific Division Meeting Program 2017
The American Philosophical Association PACIFIC DIVISION NINETY-FIRST ANNUAL MEETING PROGRAM THE WESTIN SEATTLE SEATTLE, WASHINGTON APRIL 12 – 15, 2017 VIVA VOCE ENTANGLEMENTS Conversations with A System of Philosophy Italian Philosophers Crispin Sartwell Silvia Benso CENTERING NEO-CONFUCIAN AND EXTENDING ECOLOGICAL HUMANISM NEW FORMS An Essay on An Interpretive Engage- OF REVOLT Metaphysical Sense ment with Wang Fuzhi Essays on Kristeva’s Steven G. Smith (1619–1692) Intimate Politics Nicholas S. Brasovan Sarah K. Hansen and Available May 2017 Rebecca Tuvel, editors EDGAR ALLAN POE, Available June 2017 EUREKA, AND GOD AND THE SELF SCIENTIFIC IN HEGEL CONFUCIANISM, A IMAGINATION Beyond Subjectivism HABIT OF THE HEART David N. Stamos Paolo Diego Bubbio Bellah, Civil Religion, Available July 2017 and East Asia SELF-REALIZATION Philip J. Ivanhoe and THROUGH CONFUCIAN ZHUANGZI’S CRITIQUE Sungmoon Kim, editors LEARNING OF THE CONFUCIANS A Contemporary Blinded by the Human ESSAYS ON THE FOUN- Reconstruction of Kim-chong Chong DATIONS OF ETHICS Xunzi’s Ethics Siufu Tang WHITEHEAD’S C. I. Lewis RELIGIOUS THOUGHT John Lange, editor From Mechanism to Available June 2017 POETIC FRAGMENTS Organism, From Force Karoline von Günderrode to Persuasion THE VARIETY OF Translated and with Daniel A. Dombrowski INTEGRAL ECOLOGIES Introductory Essays by Nature, Culture, Anna C. Ezekiel CONFUCIANISM AND and Knowledge AMERICAN PHILOSOPHY in the Planetary Era MOUNTAINS, RIVERS, Mathew A. Foust Sam Mickey, Sean Kelly, AND THE GREAT EARTH and Adam Robbert, Reading -
Soft Power, Hard Issues
Soft Power, Hard Issues Reports of the 2005 Aspen Institute Roundtable on Public Diplomacy and the Middle East and the Forum on Communications and Society Shanthi Kalathil Rapporteur Communications and Society Program Charles M. Firestone Executive Director Washington, DC 2006 To purchase additional copies of this report, please contact: The Aspen Institute Fulfillment Office P.O. Box 222 109 Houghton Lab Lane Queenstown, Maryland 21658 Phone: (410) 820-5326 Fax: (410) 827-9174 E-mail: [email protected] For all other inquiries, please contact: The Aspen Institute Communications and Society Program One Dupont Circle, NW Suite 700 Washington, DC 20036 Phone: (202) 736-5818 Fax: (202) 467-0790 Charles M. Firestone Patricia K. Kelly Executive Director Assistant Director Copyright © 2006 by The Aspen Institute The Aspen Institute One Dupont Circle, NW Suite 700 Washington, DC 20036 Published in the United States of America in 2006 by The Aspen Institute All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 0-89843-447-5 06-006 1527CSP/06-BK Contents FOREWORD, Charles M. Firestone ............................................................vii SOFT POWER,HARD ISSUES, Shanthi Kalathil...............................................1 Public Diplomacy and the Middle East A report on the Aspen Institute Roundtable on Public Diplomacy and the Middle East Introduction .................................................................................................3 Setting the Stage: Old versus New...............................................................4 -
White Cat, Black Cat Or Good Cat: the Beijing Consensus As an Alternative Philosophy for Policy Deliberation? the Case of China
DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL POLICY AND INTERVENTION BARNETT PAPERS IN SOCIAL RESEARCH White Cat, Black Cat or Good Cat: The Beijing Consensus as an Alternative Philosophy for Policy Deliberation? The Case of China Reza Hasmath WORKING PAPER 14-02 November 2014 Editor: Erzsébet Bukodi Department of Social Policy and Intervention University of Oxford Barnett House 32 Wellington Square Oxford, OX1 2ER [email protected] White Cat, Black Cat or Good Cat: The Beijing Consensus as an Alternative Philosophy for Policy Deliberation? The Case of China Reza Hasmath School of Interdisciplinary Area Studies, University of Oxford Email: [email protected] Abstract This paper argues that the Beijing Consensus represents a philosophical movement towards an ultra-pragmatic view of conducting policy deliberation. Contrary to models of development which provide a subset of policy prescriptions for the policymakers’ disposal or a fundamentalist adherence to a particular economic tradition, the philosophical intentionality of the Beijing Consensus is reflected in the infamous words of Deng Xiaoping “I do not care if it is a white cat or a black cat … It is a good cat so long as it catches mice”. That is, the Beijing Consensus inherently recognises that each development scenario has a potential set of challenges that may require unique and/or experimental solutions factoring the current political, social and economic environment. This ultra-pragmatism will require the policymaker to engage in greater policy experimentation, and to have a larger risk-elasticity. Further, this philosophy is most aptly demonstrated by looking at the aggregation of practices and lessons learned using the recent policy experiences of China. -
Canadian Excellence, Global Recognition: Canada's 2017
Canadian excellence, Global recognition: Canada’s 2017 winners of major international research awards Cette publication est aussi disponible en français. the leading scholars profiled in this publication institutions across Canada. There is a chemistry exemplify the creativity and dedication of Canada’s associated with the Canadian research environment – research talent. Their award-winning work is helping an entrenched spirit of collaboration, enviable talent to build Canada’s reputation for research excellence pool, and an unwavering determination to solve across the globe, and their success makes a strong problems and address the most pressing challenges case for enhanced investment in the fundamental facing humankind – that leads to breakthroughs. research that transforms society. I offer my congratulations to the winners celebrated These scholars demonstrate why Canada is increas- here and express my hopes that they and their col- ingly a partner of choice in international research leagues will continue to produce work that transforms collaboration. While our researchers and research our understanding of ourselves and the universe networks often achieve their best work through inter- around us – whether they conduct their research at a national collaboration, there is a uniqueness about the desk, in a laboratory or a lake, in a neighbourhood or Canadian research landscape that warrants recogni- on a farm, or two kilometres down a mine shaft. tion. Our work on the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory benefited greatly from this, with wonderful -
The Charlie Rose Show April 13, 2010 Analysis of Obama`S Nuclear Security Summit GUESTS: Sam Nunn, David Sanger, Joshua Cooper Ramo
The Charlie Rose Show April 13, 2010 Analysis of Obama`s Nuclear Security Summit GUESTS: Sam Nunn, David Sanger, Joshua Cooper Ramo CHARLIE ROSE: We begin tonight with the nuclear security summit that wrapped up in Washington earlier today. The gathering of 47 world leaders was the largest hosted by an American president since Franklin Roosevelt called a meeting that created the United Nations. The summit is the largest and latest step in President Obama`s bold nuclear diplomacy. He has pledged to secure all loose nuclear materials during his first term in office. Addressing the plenary session this morning, the president spoke of the threat of nuclear terrorism. CHARLIE ROSE: Joining me now is Joshua Cooper Ramo of Kissinger Associates. He`s a former journalist who has written this piece in "Time" magazine "The China Challenge, A New Way Forward," from Atlanta, former senator Sam Nunn. He is CEO of the Nuclear Threat Initiative. And joining us shortly from Washington, David Sanger of "The New York Times" who`s been covering this summit all day. I`m pleased to have all of them on this broadcast. And of course I begin with Sam Nunn in Atlanta. Tell me what you think this summit has accomplished and what difference it makes. SAM NUNN: Charlie, it makes a big difference in terms of getting the world focused, particularly the leadership, focused on what I believe is our most serious security threat, and that is the possibility of catastrophic nuclear terrorism. For the last ten years I`ve been posing a couple questions. -
BERGGRUEN INSTITUTE China / SUPPLEMENTAL COUNTRY
BERGGRUEN GOVERNANCE INDEX China / SUPPLEMENTAL COUNTRY CASE STUDY 2019 BERGGRUEN INSTITUTE Hertie School of Governance & UCLA Luskin School of Public Affairs 2019 GOVERNANCE INDEX TEAM Principal Investigator Helmut K. Anheier Project Supervisor, Berggruen Institute Dawn Nakagawa Research Scientist Markus Lang, Heidelberg University Data Updates CJ Yetman, Hertie School of Governance Editorial Regina A. List, Hertie School of Governance TEAM MEMBERS WHO CONTRIBUTED TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE INDEX Project Founders and Creators Nicolas Berggruen and Nathan Gardels Research Scientists Matthias Haber, Liam F. McGrath, and Piero Stanig Research Associates Edward L. Knudsen, Olga Kononykhina, and CJ Yetman Manager Regina A. List Additional Assistance Sonja Kaufmann, Jessica Leong Cohen, Diego Fernández, Christopher Ellis Designed at the Hertie School CHINA / SUPPLEMENTAL COUNTRY CASE STUDY 2019 | 3 China / SUPPLEMENTAL COUNTRY CASE STUDY 2019 This profile on China is a supplement to the 2019 Berggruen Governance Index which analyzes the quality of Democracy, Government and Life for 38 countries. In 2019, five countries from the 38 were selected to have special profiles created about them to supplement and enhance the findings in the Index. These countries were selected because they performed better (Overachiever) or worse (Underachiever) than expected on the Quality of Life given their scores on one of the other indices (Quality of Democracy or Quality of Government). To create the supplement, new data was sourced from outside the Governance Index, to further explain these results. This profile is not intended as a stand alone document and is best understood after reviewing the full report which can be found at www.berggruen.org. -
The Janus-Faced China: How Is China Presented in Anglo-American Media?
UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) The making of China: The construction of Chineseness during the Beijing Olympics Zeng, G. Publication date 2013 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Zeng, G. (2013). The making of China: The construction of Chineseness during the Beijing Olympics. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:30 Sep 2021 Chapter Three The Janus-Faced China: How is China Presented in Anglo-American Media? Despite the slogan of “One World, One Dream,” the Beijing Olympic Games turn out to be a multi-themed mega-media event. The rejection of Beijing’s first bid for hosting the Games, and the approval of the second were both related to political concerns (Brownell 2008; Haugen 2008). -
The Beijing Consensus
FM.qxd 5/11/04 4:12 PM Page i The Foreign Policy Centre The Foreign Policy Centre is a leading European think-tank launched under the patronage of the British Prime Minister Tony Blair to develop a vision of a fair and rule-based world order. Through our research, publications and events, we aim to develop innovative policy ideas that promote: • Effective multilateral solutions to global problems • Democratic and well-governed states as the foundation of order and development • Partnerships with the private sector and NGOs to deliver public goods • Support for progressive policy through effective public diplomacy • Inclusive definitions of citizenship to underpin internationalist policies The Foreign Policy Centre has produced a range of publications by key thinkers on subjects relating to the role of non-state actors in policymak- ing, the future of Europe, international security and identity. These include: The Post-Modern State and the World Order by Robert Cooper, Network Europe and Public Diplomacy by Mark Leonard, NGO Rights and Responsibilities by Michael Edwards, After Multiculturalism by Yasmin Alibhai-Brown, Trading Identities by Wally Olins and Third Generation Corporate Citizenship by Simon Zadek. The Centre runs a rich and varied events programme at The Mezzanine in Elizabeth House – a forum where representatives from NGOs, think- tanks, companies and government can interact with speakers who include prime ministers, Nobel Prize laureates, global corporate leaders, activists, media executives and cultural entrepreneurs from around the world. The Centre’s magazine, Global Thinking, is a regular outlet for new thinking on foreign policy issues. Features include profiles, exclusive interviews with decision makers, and opinion pieces by the Centre’s per- manent staff and associated authors. -
Deanna Bowen Guggenheim Fellowship in Creative Arts
Canadian excellence, Global recognition: Celebrating Canada’s 2016 winners of major international research awards Cette brochure est aussi disponible en français. In our globalized world, where knowledge is vital, awards are important indicators of success. In fact, nothing attracts and retains talent and resources better than achievement and recognition at the international level. Canadians have so much knowledge to share, and we are doing so in multiple ways, in multiple areas. Turning these pages, you can see that the world is recognizing our accomplishments. We have muchTheir to celebrate.accomplishments are the combined result of exceptional talent, dedication, collaboration and sup- These 24 men and womenport, andare we Canadianare all the beneficiaries success storiesof their .break Their- accomplishments in their chosenthrough fields discoveries. demonstrate clearly that Canada is an innovative and creative nation.It’s soThese important recipients that we celebrateof international the achievements awards are doing exceptional and leadingof our leadingedge researchthinkers and, researchand they teams. have By doing had a so, we attract talent and resources from around the positive impact on society and on humanity. world, and we help tell the story of why learning and innovation matter for all of us. That’s why it’s so critical Moreover, this just scratchesthat Canada’s the learningsurface institutions of what pursue Canadians recognition are In our globalized world,doing wherenationally knowledge and globally is vital tofor, awardstheircreate leading aare researchers,better world. nominating The themfindings for the of important indicators of success.researchers In fact, innothing Canada attracts will noand doubt topretains international influence talent awards decision and prizes makers, and enhancing artists, our the and resources better than achievementresearch community and recognition, educators at the global andinternational performanceso many asmore. -
Asian Tiger Or Fragile Dragon? Introduction
Asian Tiger or Fragile Dragon? ----Understanding China’s Development Model Fubing Su Department of Political Science Vassar College 124 Raymond Ave Poughkeepsie, NY 12604 [email protected] Ran Tao School of Economics Remin University of China Haidian District Beijing, China 100872 [email protected] Introduction China has become a source of excitement and contention. Its dramatic growth and sustained development have fascinated scholars from different disciplines and inspired creative works on economic growth (Lin, 1992; Brandt and Zhu, 2000; Song 2011; Rodrik 2008), market institutions (Guthrie, 1997; Wank, 1999; Whyte, 1995), federalism (Montinola, Qian and Weingast, 1995), transition (Naughton, 1996; Yang, 1997), and capitalism (Hung 2008). These studies not only brought to light the underlying currents that carried the tide of China, but also facilitated critical reflections on the mainstream theories deeply rooted in western experiences. In recent years, a similar excitement started to animate passionate debates about the most appropriate development strategies for developing countries. Many policy analysts looked to China for innovative ideas and concrete policies that worked. One analyst, Joshua Cooper Ramo, was particularly provocative and claimed that a “made-in-China” development model had already emerged in the East (Ramo, 2004). According to him, the Chinese success was based on a set of policies, including emphasis on research, innovation, sustainability, and equality. Most important of all, the Beijing Consensus, in Ramo’s word, endorsed a more active role of the state 1 in orchestrating national development and setting the terms for global engagement. This new development approach challenged the founding principles and policy prescriptions of the Washington Consensus (Williamson, 1989). -
Loading “MSNBC - Does the Future Belong to China?” 02/09/2006 11:04 PM
Loading “MSNBC - Does the Future Belong to China?” 02/09/2006 11:04 PM MSNBC.com Does the Future Belong to China? A new power is emerging in the East. How America should handle unprecedented new challenges, threats —and opportunities. By Fareed Zakaria Newsweek May 9 issue - Americans admire beauty, but they are truly dazzled by bigness. Think of the Grand Canyon, the California redwoods, Grand Central Terminal, Disney World, SUVs, the American armed forces, General Electric, the Double Quarter Pounder (With Cheese) and the Venti Latte. Europeans prefer complexity and nuance, the Japanese revere minuteness and minimalism. But Americans like size, preferably supersize. That's why China hits the American imagination so hard. It is a country whose scale dwarfs the United States—1.3 billion people, four times America's population. For more than a hundred years it was dreams of this magnitude that fascinated small groups of American missionaries and businessmen—1 billion souls to save; 2 billion armpits to deodorize—but it never amounted to anything. China was very big, but very poor. All that is changing. But now the very size and scale that seemed so alluring is beginning to look ominous. And Americans are wondering whether the "China threat" is nightmarishly real. Every businessman these days has a dazzling statistic about China, meant to stun the listener into silence. And they are an impressive set of numbers. China is now the world's largest producer of coal, steel and cement, the second largest consumer of energy and the third largest importer of oil, which is why gas prices are soaring.