{FREE} the Iliad and the Odyssey Ebook
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
THE ILIAD AND THE ODYSSEY PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Homer,Jan Parker,George Chapman,Tom Griffith | 976 pages | 01 Aug 2000 | Wordsworth Editions Ltd | 9781840221176 | English | Herts, United Kingdom The Iliad and Odyssey Linguistic analysis suggests that the Iliad was composed slightly before the Odyssey , and that Homeric formulae preserve older features than other parts of the poems. The Homeric poems were composed in unrhymed dactylic hexameter ; ancient Greek metre was quantity-based rather than stress-based. These habits aid the extemporizing bard, and are characteristic of oral poetry. For instance, the main words of a Homeric sentence are generally placed towards the beginning, whereas literate poets like Virgil or Milton use longer and more complicated syntactical structures. Homer then expands on these ideas in subsequent clauses; this technique is called parataxis. The so-called ' type scenes ' typische Scenen , were named by Walter Arend in He noted that Homer often, when describing frequently recurring activities such as eating, praying , fighting and dressing, used blocks of set phrases in sequence that were then elaborated by the poet. The 'Analyst' school had considered these repetitions as un-Homeric, whereas Arend interpreted them philosophically. Parry and Lord noted that these conventions are found in many other cultures. C, B, A has been observed in the Homeric epics. Opinion differs as to whether these occurrences are a conscious artistic device, a mnemonic aid or a spontaneous feature of human storytelling. Both of the Homeric poems begin with an invocation to the Muse. The orally transmitted Homeric poems were put into written form at some point between the eighth and sixth centuries BC. Some scholars believe that they were dictated to a scribe by the poet and that our inherited versions of the Iliad and Odyssey were in origin orally-dictated texts. Other scholars hold that, after the poems were created in the eighth century, they continued to be orally transmitted with considerable revision until they were written down in the sixth century. Most scholars attribute the book divisions to the Hellenistic scholars of Alexandria, in Egypt. After the establishment of the Library of Alexandria , Homeric scholars such as Zenodotus of Ephesus, Aristophanes of Byzantium and in particular Aristarchus of Samothrace helped establish a canonical text. The first printed edition of Homer was produced in in Milan, Italy. Today scholars use medieval manuscripts, papyri and other sources; some argue for a "multi-text" view, rather than seeking a single definitive text. The nineteenth-century edition of Arthur Ludwich mainly follows Aristarchus's work, whereas van Thiel's , follows the medieval vulgate. Others, such as Martin West — or T. Allen, fall somewhere between these two extremes. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. This is the latest accepted revision , reviewed on 20 October For other uses, see Homer disambiguation. For other uses, see Homeric disambiguation and Homerus disambiguation. It is not to be confused with Homerian. Further information: Ancient accounts of Homer. Further information: Homeric scholarship and Homeric Question. Main article: Historicity of the Homeric epics. Main article: Homeric Greek. Ancient Greece portal Poetry portal Literature portal. The British Museum. Encyclopedia of Ancient Greece. Retrieved 22 November A Short History of Greek Literature. University of Chicago Press. Cambridge University Press. Classical Literature: An Introduction. Retrieved 23 November A Companion to Greek Literature. Gary Walter de Gruyter. The Odyssey Re-formed. Cornell University Press. Homer, His Art and His World. University of Michigan Press. The Idea of the Library in the Ancient World. OUP Oxford. Oxford University Press. Archived from the original on 30 June The Homer Encyclopedia. Homer: The Resonance of Epic. The Lives of the Greek Poets. December Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society. The Classical Tradition. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. The Oxford History of the Classical World. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. Indiana University Press. Classical Quarterly. Douglas De Gruyter. Homer and the Odyssey. The Cambridge Companion to Homer. JHU Press. Homer and the Origins of the Greek Alphabet. Hellenicity: Between Ethnicity and Culture. Oxford: Clarendon Press. The World of Odysseus. War and Violence in Ancient Greece. Classical Antiquity. A Companion to Greek Mythology. Encyclopedia of the Ancient Greek World. Infobase Publishing. A New Companion to Homer. In Search of the Trojan War. Berkeley, California: University of California Press. Retrieved 1 September The Mycenaeans. Los Angeles, California: The J. Paul Getty Museum. Brimscombe Port: The History Press. A Companion to the Ancient Greek Language. Edwards, Mark Bristol Classical Press. Oral Tradition. Princeton University Press. Vergil's Empire: Political Thought in the Aeneid. Homer and the Oral Tradition. Poetry as Performance: Homer and Beyond. Pfeiffer, History of Classical Scholarship Oxford, Stanley, The Shield of Homer Princeton, 37, ff. The Homeric Question and the Oral- formulaic Theory. Homer is definitely a master of the Greek It's a damn Greek tragedy! Homer is definitely a master of the Greek epic. His writing resembles that of a playwright of modern day and even harkens back to a bit of Shakespearean feeling in the emotion of the characters. This is definitely a classic for the ages and in my opinion one that should be read once by everyone. I am reading this to two sets of students and it never gets old. My only complaint is that the Provensons left out Argos. I do believe it is the best children's Homer I have read. I love the chapter breakdowns which are almost parallel to the poems. The Provensons never disappoint, do they? May 05, 1marcus rated it it was amazing. The adventure, mystery, and the understanding of pre-history are great for anyone who wants to read this book. All these things made me want to read the book over again and even write a book review on it. First the adventure is wild from the start. Fighting the Cyclopes and winning made me think that no matter what the size of the person or object I can win if I put my mind to it and want it bad enough. Adventure keeps me reading the book. Never will you have to do that with this book. Last the understanding of the pre-history is good for one if they are trying to learn about ancient history. We hope that you find Homer's "Odyssey" enjoyable whether you are reading it for school, for study, or for pleasure. What will you do View 1 comment. Well, after hearing of the Iliad and the Odyssey for my entire life through the miasma of culture, media, and that one primary school teacher who, to my memory, taught me nothing but greek myth big up Miss Fahey , I finally got around to reading them. Well, kind of. Reading stories this old is like saying you finally heard Bohemian Rhapsody, but it was played by some guy in a pub who heard another guy describe it admitantly, really well on the radio from the time his dad played it for him aft Well, after hearing of the Iliad and the Odyssey for my entire life through the miasma of culture, media, and that one primary school teacher who, to my memory, taught me nothing but greek myth big up Miss Fahey , I finally got around to reading them. Reading stories this old is like saying you finally heard Bohemian Rhapsody, but it was played by some guy in a pub who heard another guy describe it admitantly, really well on the radio from the time his dad played it for him after hearing a woman sing it in a talent show after she heard it from etc. How much of Homer was the OG Homer? Do we even know if any of Homer's words even survived the subsequent changes the other Homers added to the text? And what about the text? Do we count the person who first put it to paper as a 'Homer'? Or are they just counted as translators? And what about translators?? These are too many questions to sift through and I'm no where near qualified enough to answer any of them so I'm not getting involved in that whole nebulous "oral tradition" malarky, it's irrelevant as I can only judge what I have read in this here collection of words that made up two long but brilliant poems. All the points I have about these epics, positive and negative, stem from the literary collection that I imbibed. So here is what I think of that pysical thing that I bought which had two epic poems called The Iliad and The Odyssey, which were both written down onto the page by some guy other than Homer, then Translated by another dude who also wasn't Homer, and read by a guy who really isn't Homer. I'm talking about that. And to make it even more confusing, I listened to them via audiobook. Yeah, this review is already a mess They're all save for the wooden horse alluded to, foreshadowed, and set up throughout the poem, but they're not described or shown. Long story short; no pay off. The poem ends before any of that occurs. Now I hear you say, "but Tom, that's not what the Iliad was about! It was about Achilles, his argument with Agamemnon, and his rage at the death of Patroclus. Everyone knows all of that is going to happen anyhow, you don't need to show it. BUT The structure and time given to the overarching plot of the war, its soldiers and its greater surroundings, not to mention the battle between the gods, is left unfinished. For HUGE swathes of the poem, we were brought inside battles, raids, plans for tearing down walls, loss of naval escape routes, people's families back home and debts that are forever left unpaid and crimes that are left unresolved due to the actions and the bloodshed of the trojan war.