Review of Current Methods and Approaches for Simple on Farm Environmental Monitoring Of

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Review of Current Methods and Approaches for Simple on Farm Environmental Monitoring Of REVIEW OF CURRENT METHODS AND APPROACHES FOR SIMPLE ON FARM ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING OF FAB SOLUTIONS Activity 2 will identify user-friendly tools and methods to measure the environmental and socio- economic performance of FAB solutions The aim of this report is to: • Review methods to measure the environmental performance of FAB solutions. The focus is on biodiversity, soils and water quality. • Identify scientific approaches that could be used at the farm level and implemented by farmers or extension workers. • Determine if and potentially how these measurement approaches could feed into and support regional or national monitoring. Program Practical information “FABulous Farmers” Project, Activity 2.1 Report DATE: 19th December 2019 CONTACT: David Robinson: [email protected] +44 (0)1491-374-500 Organised by UKCEH Authors: Lindsay Maskell, Lisa Norton, Jamie Alison, Sabine Reinsch & David A. Robinson Page 1 CONTENTS Review of current methods and approaches for simple on farm environmental monitoring of FAB solutions ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 Program........................................................................................................................................................ 1 Practical information .................................................................................................................................. 1 Contents ........................................................................................................................................................ 2 1. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Project Background ............................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Main aims of activity 2 and this review ................................................................................................. 3 1.3 Project Context and Overview .............................................................................................................. 3 2.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 5 2.1.1. FAB solutions ....................................................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Methodology for the review ................................................................................................................. 5 2.3 Measurements and Indicators for FAB interventions ........................................................................... 8 2.3.1. (1) Reduced tillage techniques (reduced soil disturbance and compaction)...................................................... 8 2.3.2. (2) Mixed crops/crop rotations and sward diversity .........................................................................................11 (2.a) Mixed crops/crop rotations .....................................................................................................................................11 2.3.1. (2.2b) Sward diversity........................................................................................................................................13 2.3.3 (3) Cover / catch-crops (including legumes) .....................................................................................................19 2.3.4 (4) Organic matter input (plant residuals, wood chips, biochar) .....................................................................22 2.3.5 (5) Modified manure management, quality and diversity (fresh manure, limited use of fertilizer) ................25 2.3.6 (6) Agroforestry .................................................................................................................................................29 2.3.7 (7) Hedgerow management ..............................................................................................................................35 2.3.8 (8) Field margin management ..........................................................................................................................42 2.3.9 (9) Reduction in the use of plant protection products (PPPs) ...........................................................................45 2.3.10. (10) Semi-natural landscape elements (provide habitat) ............................................................................48 2.4 indicators ............................................................................................................................................ 52 2.5 Can on farm measurements be used to understand state and change at the regional or national scale? ........................................................................................................................................................... 52 2. REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................................................. 61 Page 2 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 PROJECT BACKGROUND The agricultural sector, the basis for the agro-food sector in North West Europe (NEW), is today heavily dependent on external inputs (fertilizers, pesticides, etc.) and creates a number of negative effects on the quality of natural resources (soil, water, biodiversity). Functional Agrobiodiversity (FAB) (targeted stimulation of biodiversity to deliver ecosystem services such as pest and disease control, pollination, soil and water quality) offers opportunities to drastically reduce the dependence on inputs, but the knowledge in this area is still highly fragmented and insufficiently embedded in agricultural practice, policy and society. FABulous Farmers aims to accelerate the implementation of FAB by farmers and other land managers in NWE, by collecting, deepening and sharing knowledge and practical experiences about FAB between farmers, scientists, citizens and policy makers in 12 pilot regions in NWE over 5 countries (FR, NL, UK, BE and LUX). 10 FAB solutions are developed in a region-oriented manner, tested and demonstrated across 315 farms and evaluated for ecological performance and economic profitability, with the aim of reducing the dependence on external inputs by an average of 30%. In each pilot region, a FAB learning network is set up in which farmers exchange knowledge and experiences and draw up a FAB action plan. In addition, we collaborate with local actors, citizens, policy makers and value chain partners to embed FAB more widely in society, policy and market, through the design and implementation of FAB landscape integration plans and the rollout of citizen science tools; development of policy papers (at EU and national / regional level), and 12 business cases for valorisation of FAB via the market. Finally, a long-term development plan is drawn up for the continuation and expansion of the FAB learning networks after the end of the project. 1.2 MAIN AIMS OF ACTIVITY 2 AND THIS REVIEW Activity 2 will identify user-friendly tools and methods to measure the environmental and socio-economic performance of FAB solutions. NERC-CEH will focus on the environmental effects and their measurement (soil, water & ecology) the subject of this review Activity 2.1. ILVO and ZLTO (NL) on farmer costs and benefits (based on farmers needs in the pilot regions) Activity 2.3 and UvA on social costs and benefits of an exemplar Activity 2.5. They will work with all partners to determine what will work on the ground and balance the need for on farm efficiency with the need for scientific robustness to measure change and provide flying experts to aid on farm assessment by regional partners. The aim of this report is to: Review methods to measure the environmental performance of FAB solutions. The focus is on biodiversity, soils and water quality. Identify scientific approaches that could be used at the farm level and implemented by farmers or extension workers. Determine if and potentially how these measurement approaches could feed into and support regional or national monitoring. 1.3 PROJECT CONTEXT AND OVERVIEW Agriculture is a defining part of the agro-food cluster, which is of strategic importance in Europe (6% of EU’s GVA, 24 million jobs) and in NWE in particular (agro-food cluster is part of most national/regional innovation strategies for smart specialisation). Almost half of the land in NWE is farmed (48% in EU, Eurostat) producing food, fuel and fibre for the agro-food sector and the bio-based economy and delivering public goods and services like water retention and landscape values. Agricultural land in NEW consists of 60% of arable land with crops and vegetables and 34% of permanent grassland. Over the past five decades, the EU Common Agricultural Policy has encouraged farmers to modernize and intensify production. This led to a mainly “linear” production approach, resulting in farming becoming a resource intensive sector, dependent on many external inputs (fertilizers, pesticides, machinery,…) and natural Page 3 resources (soil, water, biodiversity), maximising production at the cost of polluting the environment and reducing farmland biodiversity. Agriculture accounted for 51% of the total water use in EU in 2014. In 2012 more than 90% of the assessed River Basin
Recommended publications
  • Boyd Cynthia.Pdf
    Reading Women's Home and Garden Lives: A Folkloristic Examination of the English Gardening Books of Marion Cran by Cynthia Boyd A thesis submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Folklore Memorial University of Newfoundland St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador October 2013 ll Abstract Building on scholarship from folklore and literature, everyday autobiography, women's traditional culture, and women's garden history, this thesis examines how Marion Cran documented home and garden experiences in Surrey and Kent through a series of gardening books she wrote between 1913 and 1941. While providing useful information on plants and gardening practices, Cran' s writing was fragmented and tangential: her books were filled with planting references suffused with culinary tips and recipes and traditional lore that evoked meaning and "encoded memories" (Kirshenblatt-Gimblett 1989). Although Cran was fascinated by garden styles indicative of the period, such as the English cottage garden, she also valued individuality in garden making, and implored her readers to create gardens that fulfilled their own expectations. In her everyday autobiographies, Cran revealed her innermost thoughts based on her own experiences and what she learned through her observations of and interactions with fellow gardeners and homemakers. Cran inspired a predominantly female audience to create and maintain homes and gardens that benefited their own lives as well as those of their families and members of their communities. In direct correlation, women corresponded with Cran, confiding to her their own home and garden experiences whether they lived in England or South Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • BIRD R£F Ugts
    BIRD R£f UGtS U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FISH AND WILDLIFE BULLETIN 17 SERVICE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Harold L. Ickes, Secretary FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Ira N. Gabrielson, Director Conservation Bulletin 17 LOCAL BIRD REFUGES By W. L. McATEE Technical Adviser, Office of the Director Fish and Wildlife Service UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1942 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D. C. Price 10 cents IRDS appeal strongly to the interests and affec­ B tions of mankind. Not only do they charm by their graceful forms, harmonious colors, sprightly actions, and usually pleasing notes, but they have an even more important claim upon our esteem because of their great economic value. Birds feed upon practically all insect pests. They are voracious, are aide to move freely from place to place, and exert a steady influence in keeping down the swelling tide of insect life. For economic as well as for esthetic reasons, there­ fore, an effort should he made to attract and protect birds and to increase their numbers. Where proper measures of this kind have been taken an increase of several fold in the bird population has resulted, with decreased losses from depredations of injurious insects. This bulletin deals with the establishment of local refuges as a means of attracting birds and is adapted for use throughout the United States. ii LOCAL BIRD REFUGES CONTENTS Page rage Introduction 1 Municipal parks and picnic and fair Bird refuges on farms 2 grounds n Wood lots 4 School and college grounds 14 Roadsides a Cemeteries 15 Rights-of-way S Reservoirs 15 Community parkings 0 Golf courses in INTRODUCTION "DIRD CONSERVATION hi the United States is a well-estab­ lished policy that has been written into one of the best codes of State and Federal protective laws in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Build Bird Populations with Food Plants
    ARNOLDIA A continuation of the BULLETIN OF POPULAR INFORMATION of the Arnold Arboretum, Harvard University VOLUME 5 April 6, IJ’I~J NUMBERS 2-3 BUILD BIRD POPULATION WITH FOOD PLANTS is an essential feature of every attractive landscape. Not only the BIRD-LIFEtown garden and lawn, but the farmstead with its fence rows and hedges, its fields and woodland edges, has its interest heightened by the color, the activ- ity, and the song of our native birds. And the charm of these feathered citizens lies not only in their beauty, but in the hard, cold fact that they benefit the townsman and the farmer economically through their destruction of harmful in- insects and weed seeds. They serve to maintain balance in nature by keeping in check grasshoppers, gypsy moths, tent caterpillars and rodents, the over-popu- lation of any one of which might drive man from great areas of the earth. By the consumption of millions of weed seeds they also reduce the competition of weeds with cultivated plants. The most interesting way to attract a greater population of birds about the home is to plant trees and shrubs especially attractive to them. Such plants may provide escape cover, in which birds may take refuge from their enemies or from storms ; nesting cover, which furnishes the right type of support for young birds’ cradles; or winter cover, represented by the conifers and most important where the ground is long covered with snow. If a cover, in addition to any of the above uses, will serve to provide bird food-mainly as seeds or fruits, but for some birds as buds or leaves or bark -such trees and shrubs serve doubly well.
    [Show full text]
  • Open As a Single Document
    ARNOLD ARBORETUM HARVARD UNIVERSITY ARNOLDIA A continuation of the BULLETIN OF POPULAR INFORMATION VOLUME V 1945 PUBLISHED BY THE ARNOLD ARBORETUM J.4MAIC4 PLAIN, hIASS.hCHUSE’1"1S - ILLUSTRATIONS The Cedar Waxwing is so fond of fruit that it has been called the Cherry Bird. Plate I, p. 7. Winterberry (Ilex verticillafa) a deciduous holly with red berries in the fall and early winter. Plate II, p. 11. Mountain Ash (Sorbus americarra). Always attractive to the birds in early fall. Plate III, p. 13. Most of the viburnums prove attractive to the birds when in fruit. This is the Arrowwood (Viburnum dentatum) in flower. Plate IV, p. 17. Plants in the tropical arboretum of the Atkins Institution of the Arnold Arbore- tum, Soledad, Cienfuegos, Cuba, one of the few arboretums in Tropical Amer- ica. (I) The Traveller’s Tree. (2) Bamboo at its best. Plate V, p. 30. The famous "Lilac Path" at the Arnold Arboretum. Plate VI, p. 35. The well planned propagating unit of the Arboretum of the University of Wash- ington, Seattle. Plate VII, p. 41. The beautiful Thornhill Building of the Morton Arboretum. Plate VIII, p. 43. The hedge collection from the rose garden at the Morton Arboretum, Lisle, Illi- nois. Plate IX, p. 43. Jlap of the United States showing the locations of the arboretums listed on pages 46-48. Plate X, p. 45. Viburnum Lantaua grown as a hedge in the Canadian Government Experimental Garden at Ottawa, Canada. Plate XI, p. 59. Two snowballs for the North. Left, the European snowball, Viburnum Opulus ro- seum.
    [Show full text]
  • Naturalistic Landscaping
    Naturalistic Landscaping Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service “I went to stay at a very grand and beautiful place in the country where the grounds are said to be laid out with consummate taste. For the first three or four days, I was enchanted. It seemed much better than Nature, that I began to wish the earth had been laid out according to the latest principles of improvement. In three days’ time I was tired to death; a Thistle, a heap of dead bushes, anything that wore the appearance of accident and want of intention was quite a relief. I used to escape from the made grounds and walk upon the adjacent goose common, where the cart ruts, gravel pits, bumps, coarse ungentlemanlike Grass, and all the varieties produced by neglect were a thousand times more gratifying.” —Sydney Smith 2 Landscaping is the arrangement of plant material results and provide the most pleasure. A home stand- using its form, texture and color to create special ing on the “prairie” with one old apple tree can create effects. Good landscaping can create a sense of privacy a living environment. A house in the woods with a or a feeling of being somewhere special. winding trail among the tree trunks leading away The above statement does not make a distinction from the house and returning to a patio in the sun also between ornamental plant material, with which we creates a living environment. create ornamental landscapes, and indigenous or The selection of plant material and the creation of native plant material of the natural landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Native Plants to Attract Birds in the Washington, D.C. Area
    Green Spring Gardens 4603 Green Spring Rd ● Alexandria ● VA 22312 Phone: 703-642-5173 ● TTY: 703-803-3354 www.fairfaxcounty.gov/parks/greenspring USING NATIVE PLANTS TO ATTRACT BIRDS IN THE WASHINGTON, D.C. AREA Gardening for wildlife is a unique type of gardening that aims to attract and sustain wildlife. Birds make a garden come alive and help nourish our delight in the natural world. Growing Native Plants For Birds Native plants evolved in our region. Native plants greatly benefit birds because native species of plants and animals evolved together, so native plants are much more likely to provide the right mix of foods and support the insect populations that birds need to flourish. The Needs Of Birds 1. � Food - Plants provide food for birds in many forms: nectar, seeds, fruits, nuts, acorns, cones, buds, twigs, leaves, flowers, and sap, as well as harboring tasty animals such as insects and spiders. A landscape with many different plants can support birds with a diversity of appetites. Insects and Spiders – Native plants support far more wildlife than non-native species. Most terrestrial bird species eat insects and spiders, and almost all North American birds other than sea birds rear their young with insects and spiders (see Bringing Nature Home: How You Can Sustain Wildlife With Native Plants by Douglas Tallamy). Summer-Fruiting Trees and Shrubs Fruits that ripen from late spring into the summer are often sweet and are eagerly eaten by birds that feed on fruit. These fruits include juneberry (serviceberry), wild cherry, red mulberry, elderberry, blackberry, raspberry, and blueberry.
    [Show full text]