DOCSLIB.ORG

Death Row USA, Winter 2010

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Death Row USA, Winter 2010 DEATH ROW U.S.A. Winter 2010 A quarterly report by the Criminal Justice Project of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. Deborah Fins, Esq. Consultant to the Criminal Justice Project NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. Death Row U.S.A. Winter 2010 (As of January 1, 2010) TOTAL NUMBER OF DEATH ROW INMATES KNOWN TO LDF: 3,261 Race of Defendant: White 1,448 (44.40%) Black 1,351 (41.43%) Latino/Latina 383 (11.74%) Native American 37 ( 1.13%) Asian 41 ( 1.26%) Unknown at this issue 1 ( .03%) Gender: Male 3,200 (98.13%) Female 61 ( 1.87%) JURISDICTIONS WITH CAPITAL PUNISHMENT STATUTES: 38 Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Mexico [see note, below], North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, Wyoming, U.S. Government, U.S. Military. JURISDICTIONS WITHOUT CAPITAL PUNISHMENT STATUTES: 15 Alaska, District of Columbia, Hawaii, Iowa, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, North Dakota, Rhode Island, Vermont, West Virginia, Wisconsin. [NOTE: New Mexico repealed the death penalty prospectively. The two men already sentenced remain under sentence of death.] Death Row U.S.A. Page 1 In the United States Supreme Court Update to Fall 2009 Issue of Significant Criminal, Habeas, & Other Pending Cases for Cases to Be Decided in October Term 2009 1. CASES RAISING CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTIONS Article I Section 9 - Ex Post Facto Carr v. United States, No. 08-1301 (Ex post facto prosecution under sex offender registry act) (decision below 551 F.3d 578 (7th Cir. 2008)) Questions Presented: (1) May a person be criminally prosecuted under § 2250(a) of the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA) for failure to register when the defendant's underlying offense and travel in interstate commerce both predated enactment of the law? (2) Does the Ex Post Facto Clause preclude prosecution under § 2250(a) of a person whose underlying offense and travel in interstate commerce both predated SORNA's enactment? United States v. Marcus, No. 08-1341 (Standard of review for ex post facto violation) (decision below 538 F.3d 97 (2nd Cir. 2008)) Question Presented: Did the court of appeals depart from the Supreme Court's interpretation of Rule 52(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure by adopting as the appropriate standard for plain-error review of an asserted ex post facto violation whether "there is any possibility, no matter how unlikely, that the jury could have convicted based exclusively on pre-enactment conduct?" First Amendment United States v. Stevens, No. 08-769 (First Amendment, depiction of animal cruelty) (decision below 533 F.3d 218 (3rd Cir. 2008)) Question Presented: Is 18 U.S.C. § 48 facially invalid under the Free Speech Clause of the 1st Amendment? (18 U.S.C. § 48 prohibits the knowing creation, sale, or possession of a depiction of a live animal being intentionally maimed, mutilated, tortured, wounded, or killed, with the intention of placing that depiction in interstate or foreign commerce for commercial gain, where the conduct depicted is illegal under Federal law or the law of the State in which the creation, sale, or possession takes place, and the depiction lacks serious religious, political, scientific, educational, journalistic, historical, or artistic value.) Fourth Amendment City of Ontario v. Quon, No. 08-1332 (4th Amendment right of SWAT team member) (decision below 529 F.3d 892 (9th Cir. 2008)) Questions Presented: (1) Does a SWAT team member have a reasonable expectation of privacy in text messages transmitted on his SWAT pager, where the police department has an official no-privacy policy but a non-policymaking lieutenant announced an informal policy of allowing some personal use of the pagers? (2) Did the 9th Circuit contravene this Court's 4th Amendment precedents and create a circuit conflict by analyzing whether the police department could have used "less intrusive methods" of reviewing text messages transmitted by a SWAT team member on his SWAT pager? (3) Do individuals who send text messages to a SWAT team Death Row U.S.A. Page 2 member's SWAT pager have a reasonable expectation that their messages will be free from review by the recipient's government employer? Michigan v. Fisher, No. 09-91 (“Emergency” exception to warrant requirement) (decision below 2008 WL 786515 (Mich. App., Mar. 25, 2008)) Decision: In a per curiam opinion, the Court held that when, in response to a report of a disturbance, police find a “tumultuous situation,” signs of a recent injury, evidence of violence, a person “raging” and throwing things, they may reasonably enter a residence without a warrant. Fifth Amendment Maryland v. Shatzer, No. 08-680 (Invocation of right to counsel and delay in re-interrogation) (decision below 954 A.2d 1118 (Md. 2008)) Question Presented: Is the Edwards v. Arizona prohibition against interrogation of a suspect who has invoked the 5th Amendment right to counsel inapplicable if, after the suspect asks for counsel, there is a break in custody or a substantial lapse in time (more than two years and six months) before commencing re-interrogation pursuant to Miranda? Renico v. Lett, No. 09-338 (Mistrial and double jeopardy) (decision below 316 Fed. Appx. 373 (6th Cir, 2009)) Question Presented: Did the 6th Circuit, in a habeas case, err in holding that the Michigan Supreme Court failed to apply clearly established Supreme Court precedent under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 in denying relief on double jeopardy grounds in the circumstance where the State trial court declared a mistrial after the foreperson said that the jury was not going to be able to reach a verdict? Skilling v. United States, No. 08-1394 (Vagueness of criminal statute under Constitution) (decision below 554 F.3d 529 (5th Cir. 2009)) Question Presented: (1) Does the federal "honest services" fraud statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1346, require the government to prove that the defendant's conduct was intended to achieve "private gain" rather than to advance the employer's interests, and, if not, is § 1346 unconstitutionally vague? (See also question under 6th Amendment cases) Sixth Amendment Berghuis v. Thompkins, No. 08-1470 (Scope of the Miranda rule) (decision below 547 F.3d 572 (6th Cir. 2008)) Question Presented: (1) Did the 6th Circuit expand the Miranda rule to prevent an officer from attempting to non-coercively persuade a defendant to cooperate where the officer informed the defendant of his rights, the defendant acknowledged that he understood them, and the defendant did not invoke them but did not waive them? (See also question under habeas cases) Berguis v. Smith, No. 08-1402 (Fair cross section of jurors) (decision below 543 F.3d 326 (6th Cir. 2008)) Question Presented: Did the 6th Circuit err in concluding that the Michigan Supreme Court failed to apply “clearly established” Supreme Court precedent under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 on the issue of the fair cross-section requirement under Duren v. Missouri where the 6th Circuit adopted the comparative-disparity test (for evaluating the difference between the numbers of Death Row U.S.A. Page 3 African Americans in the community as compared to the venires), which this Court has never applied and which four circuits have specifically rejected? Bobby v. Van Hook, No. 09-144 (Effective assistance of counsel at sentencing) (decision below 560 F. 3d 523 (6th 2009)) Decision: In a per curiam opinion, the Court found that counsel had conducted an adequate investigation, consistent with the ABA guidelines in effect at the time of the trial. Briscoe v. Virginia, No. 07-11191 (Right to confront lab analyst) (decision below 657 S.E.2d 113 (Va. 2008)) Question Presented: If a state allows a prosecutor to introduce a certificate of a forensic laboratory analysis, without presenting the testimony of the analyst who prepared the certificate, does the state avoid violating the Confrontation Clause of the 6th Amendment by providing that the accused has a right to call the analyst as his own witness? Florida v. Powell, No. 08-1175 (Advising suspects of right to counsel during interrogation) (decision below 998 So. 2d 531 (Fla. 2008)) Questions Presented: (1) Does the decision of the Florida Supreme Court, holding that a suspect must be expressly advised of his right to counsel during custodial interrogation, conflict with Miranda v. Arizona and decisions of federal and state appellate courts? (2) If so, does the failure to provide express advice of the right to the presence of counsel during questioning vitiate Miranda warnings which advise of both (a) the right to talk to a lawyer “before questioning” and (b) the “right to use” the right to consult a lawyer “at any time” during questioning? Magwood v. Culliver, No. 09-158 (Counsel’s failure to challenge death penalty eligibility on resentencing) (decision below 555 F.3d 968 (11th Cir. 2009)) Question Presented: (2) Did petitioner's attorney provide ineffective assistance of counsel warranting federal habeas relief by failing to raise an argument at petitioner's resentencing proceedings that would have made clear that petitioner was constitutionally ineligible for the death penalty? (See also question under habeas cases) Padilla v. Kentucky, No. 08-651 (Duty of counsel in representing legal permanent resident) (decision below 253 S.W.3d 482 (Ky. 2008)) Questions Presented: (1) Are the mandatory deportation consequences that stem from a plea to trafficking in marijuana (an “aggravated felony” under the INA) “collateral consequences” of a criminal conviction which relieves counsel from any affirmative duty to investigate and advise? (2) Assuming immigration consequences are “collateral,” can counsel's gross misadvice as to the collateral consequence of deportation constitute a ground for setting aside a guilty plea which was induced by that faulty advice? Porter v.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Death Row U.S.A
    DEATH ROW U.S.A. Summer 2017 A quarterly report by the Criminal Justice Project of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. Deborah Fins, Esq. Consultant to the Criminal Justice Project NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. Death Row U.S.A. Summer 2017 (As of July 1, 2017) TOTAL NUMBER OF DEATH ROW INMATES KNOWN TO LDF: 2,817 Race of Defendant: White 1,196 (42.46%) Black 1,168 (41.46%) Latino/Latina 373 (13.24%) Native American 26 (0.92%) Asian 53 (1.88%) Unknown at this issue 1 (0.04%) Gender: Male 2,764 (98.12%) Female 53 (1.88%) JURISDICTIONS WITH CURRENT DEATH PENALTY STATUTES: 33 Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, Wyoming, U.S. Government, U.S. Military. JURISDICTIONS WITHOUT DEATH PENALTY STATUTES: 20 Alaska, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico [see note below], New York, North Dakota, Rhode Island, Vermont, West Virginia, Wisconsin. [NOTE: New Mexico repealed the death penalty prospectively. The men already sentenced remain under sentence of death.] Death Row U.S.A. Page 1 In the United States Supreme Court Update to Spring 2017 Issue of Significant Criminal, Habeas, & Other Pending Cases for Cases to Be Decided in October Term 2016 or 2017 1. CASES RAISING CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTIONS First Amendment Packingham v. North Carolina, No. 15-1194 (Use of websites by sex offender) (decision below 777 S.E.2d 738 (N.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Death Row U.S.A
    DEATH ROW U.S.A. Fall 2020 A quarterly report by the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. Deborah Fins Consultant to the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. Death Row U.S.A. Fall 2020 (As of October 1, 2020) TOTAL NUMBER OF DEATH ROW INMATES KNOWN TO LDF: 2553 (2553 – 180* - 877M = 1496 enforceable sentences) Race of Defendant: White 1,076 (42.15%) Black 1,062 (41.60%) Latino/Latina 343 (13.44%) Native American 24 (0.94%) Asian 47 (1.84%) Unknown at this issue 1 (0.04%) Gender: Male 2,502 (98.00%) Female 51 (2.00%) JURISDICTIONS WITH CURRENT DEATH PENALTY STATUTES: 30 Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, CaliforniaM, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, OregonM, PennsylvaniaM, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Wyoming, U.S. Government, U.S. Military. M States where a moratorium prohibiting execution has been imposed by the Governor. JURISDICTIONS WITHOUT DEATH PENALTY STATUTES: 23 Alaska, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Hampshire [see note below], New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Dakota, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin. [NOTE: New Hampshire repealed the death penalty prospectively. The man already sentenced remains under sentence of death.] * Designates the number of people in non-moratorium states who are not under active death sentence because of court reversal but whose sentence may be reimposed. M Designates the number of people in states where a gubernatorial moratorium on execution has been imposed.
    [Show full text]
  • Death Row U.S.A
    DEATH ROW U.S.A. Winter 2020 A quarterly report by the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. Deborah Fins Consultant to the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. Death Row U.S.A. Winter 2020 (As of January 1, 2020) TOTAL NUMBER OF DEATH ROW INMATES KNOWN TO LDF: 2620 (2,620 – 189* - 906M = 1525 enforceable sentences) Race of Defendant: White 1,103 (42.10%) Black 1,089 (41.56%) Latino/Latina 353 (13.47%) Native American 27 (1.03%) Asian 47 (1.79%) Unknown at this issue 1 (0.04%) Gender: Male 2,567 (97.98%) Female 53 (2.02%) JURISDICTIONS WITH CURRENT DEATH PENALTY STATUTES: 31 Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, CaliforniaM, ColoradoM, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, OregonM, PennsylvaniaM, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Wyoming, U.S. Government, U.S. Military. M States where a moratorium prohibiting execution has been imposed by the Governor. JURISDICTIONS WITHOUT DEATH PENALTY STATUTES: 22 Alaska, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Hampshire [see note below], New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Dakota, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin. [NOTE: New Hampshire repealed the death penalty prospectively. The man already sentenced remains under sentence of death.] * Designates the number of people in non-moratorium states who are not under active death sentence because of court reversal but whose sentence may be reimposed. M Designates the number of people in states where a gubernatorial moratorium on execution has been imposed.
    [Show full text]
  • Penix Representing News and Feature Formats
    SELECTED STORIES By LEONARD “LEN” PENIX REPRESENTING NEWS AND FEATURE FORMATS Leonard N. Penix, J.D., has written more than 7,500 published articles over the course of his 30-year career in daily newspaper journalism, many distributed nationwide via the Scripps-Howard and Associated Press wire services. More than half have been published online. These are samples from the major categories of newspaper writing: police, courts, short features, environmental affairs, government and politics, health and human services, education and business. ________________ INDEX Police 2-12 Health and Human Services 13-16 Features 17-34 Courts 35-45 Environment 46-51 Government and Politics 52-55 Business 56-62 Education 63-71 ________________ 1 POLICE This is one in a series of profiles Professor Penix has written for The Post about so-called "2 percenters," or hard-core bikers who lead a sophisticated, multi-state crime syndicate. This story was written about the Outlaws, a national group with thousands of members and a club in Dayton, Ohio. It was published shortly after a shootout between the Outlaws and a rival Cincinnati gang called the Iron Horsemen at Vic's Brew and Cue, a bar in Clermont County. More than 350 rounds were exchanged during the shootout, police said. Jan. 28, 1989 he distant chorus of a hundred Harleys began to pierce the cemetery quiet. The thanatotic moan grew louder, became a roar, T then a deafening dirge, as the army of bikers entered the cemetery gates. Police officers in a dozen cruisers, afraid of causing a disturbance, waited just beyond the gates as the Outlaws arrived Friday to bury one of their own.
    [Show full text]
  • Death Row U.S.A
    DEATH ROW U.S.A. Fall 2013 A quarterly report by the Criminal Justice Project of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. Deborah Fins, Esq. Consultant to the Criminal Justice Project NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. Death Row U.S.A. Fall 2013 (As of October 1, 2013) TOTAL NUMBER OF DEATH ROW INMATES KNOWN TO LDF: 3,088 Race of Defendant: White 1,335 (43.23%) Black 1,285 (41.61%) Latino/Latina 391 (12.66%) Native American 31 (1.00%) Asian 45 (1.46%) Unknown at this issue 1 (0.03%) Gender: Male 3,028 (98.06%) Female 60 (1.94%) JURISDICTIONS WITH CURRENT DEATH PENALTY STATUTES: 34 Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, Wyoming, U.S. Government, U.S. Military. JURISDICTIONS WITHOUT DEATH PENALTY STATUTES: 19 Alaska, Connecticut [see note below], District of Columbia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Maryland [see note below], Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico [see note below], New York, North Dakota, Rhode Island, Vermont, West Virginia, Wisconsin. [NOTE: Connecticut, Maryland and New Mexico repealed the death penalty prospectively. The men already sentenced in each state remain under sentence of death.] Death Row U.S.A. Page 1 In the United States Supreme Court Update to Summer 2013 Issue of Significant Criminal, Habeas, & Other Pending Cases for Cases to Be Decided in October Term 2013 1. CASES RAISING CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTIONS Article I § 10 Ex Post Facto Clause Peugh v.
    [Show full text]
  • Death Row U.S.A
    DEATH ROW U.S.A. Fall 2015 A quarterly report by the Criminal Justice Project of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. Deborah Fins, Esq. Consultant to the Criminal Justice Project NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. Death Row U.S.A. Fall 2015 (As of October 1, 2015) TOTAL NUMBER OF DEATH ROW INMATES KNOWN TO LDF: 2,959 Race of Defendant: White 1,262 (42.65%) Black 1,234 (41.70%) Latino/Latina 382 (12.91%) Native American 30 (1.01%) Asian 50 (1.69%) Unknown at this issue 1 (0.03%) Gender: Male 2,905 (98.18%) Female 54 (1.82%) JURISDICTIONS WITH CURRENT DEATH PENALTY STATUTES: 34 Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, Wyoming, U.S. Government, U.S. Military. JURISDICTIONS WITHOUT DEATH PENALTY STATUTES: 19 Alaska, Connecticut, District of Columbia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico [see note below], New York, North Dakota, Rhode Island, Vermont, West Virginia, Wisconsin. [NOTE: New Mexico repealed the death penalty prospectively. The men already sentenced remain under sentence of death.] Death Row U.S.A. Page 1 In the United States Supreme Court Update to Summer 2015 Issue of Significant Criminal, Habeas, & Other Pending Cases for Cases to Be Decided in October Term 2015 1. CASES RAISING CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTIONS Fifth Amendment Luis v. United States, No. 14-419 (Government freezing assets needed to hire lawyer) (decision below 564 Fed.
    [Show full text]
  • In Parentheses) the Names of Their Victims
    endResearch and Creative Activity ea • The Universityv of Northors Carolina at Chapel Hill Spring 2011 1977 Gary Gilmore (Ben Bushnell and Max Jensen) 1979 John Spenkelink (Joseph Szymankiewicz) Jesse Bishop (David Ballard) 1981 Steven Judy (Mark Terry, Stephen Chasteen, and Misty Zollers) 1982 Frank Coppola (Muriel Hatchell) Charlie Brooks (David Gregory) 1983 John Evans (Edward Nassa) Jimmy Lee Gray (Deressa Jean Seales) Robert Sullivan (Donald Schmidt) Robert W. Williams (Willie Kelly) John Eldon Smith (Ronald and Juanita Akins) 1984 Anthony Antone (Richard Cloud) John Taylor (David Vogler) James Autry (Shirley Drouet and Joe Broussard) James Hutchins (Roy Huskey, Pete Peterson, and Owen Messersmith) Ronald O’Bryan (Timothy O’Bryan) Arthur Goode (Jason Verdow) Elmo Pat Sonnier (Loretta Bourque and David LeBlanc) James Adams (Edgar Brown) Carl Shriner (Judith Ann Carter) Ivan Stanley (Clifford Floyd) David Washington (Daniel Pridgen, Frank Meli and Katrina Birk) Ernest Dobbert (Kelley and Ryder Dobbert) Timothy Baldwin (Mary Jane Peters) James Dupree (Henry Z. L. Riley) Linwood Briley (John Gallaher) Thomas Barefoot (Carl LeVin) Ernest Knighton (Ralph Shell) Velma Barfield (Stewart Taylor) Timothy Palmes (James Stone) Alpha Otis Stephens (Roy Asbell) Rob- ert Lee Willie (Faith Hathaway) 1985 David Martin (Bobby Todd, Terry Hebart, Anna Turrey, and Sandra Brake) Roosevelt Green (Teresa Carol Allen) Joseph Carl Shaw (Tommy Taylor and Carlotta Hartness) Doyle Skillern (Patrick Randel) James Raulerson (Mike Stewart) Van R. Solomon (Roger Dennis Tackett) Johnny Paul Witt (Jonathan Kushner) Stephen Morin (Carrie Marie Smith, Janna Bruce, and Sheila Whalen) John Young (Coleman and Gladys Brice and Katie Davis) James Briley (Judy and Harvey Barton) Jesse de la Rosa (Masaoud Ghazali) Marvin Francois (Livingston Stocker, Michael Miller, Gilbert Williams, Charles Stinson, Henry Clayton, and Randolph Holmes) Charles Milton (Manaree Denton) Morris Mason (Margaret Hand) Henry M.
    [Show full text]
  • Death Row U.S.A
    DEATH ROW U.S.A. Spring 2015 A quarterly report by the Criminal Justice Project of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. Deborah Fins, Esq. Consultant to the Criminal Justice Project NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. Death Row U.S.A. Spring 2015 (As of April 1, 2015) TOTAL NUMBER OF DEATH ROW INMATES KNOWN TO LDF: 3,002 Race of Defendant: White 1,284 (42.77%) Black 1,251 (41.67%) Latino/Latina 386 (12.86%) Native American 31 (1.03%) Asian 49 (1.63%) Unknown at this issue 1 (0.03%) Gender: Male 2,948 (98.20%) Female 54 (1.80%) JURISDICTIONS WITH CURRENT DEATH PENALTY STATUTES: 34 Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, Wyoming, U.S. Government, U.S. Military. JURISDICTIONS WITHOUT DEATH PENALTY STATUTES: 19 Alaska, Connecticut [see note below], District of Columbia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico [see note below], New York, North Dakota, Rhode Island, Vermont, West Virginia, Wisconsin. [NOTE: Connecticut and New Mexico repealed the death penalty prospectively. The men already sentenced in each state remain under sentence of death.] Death Row U.S.A. Page 1 In the United States Supreme Court Update to Winter 2015 Issue of Significant Criminal, Habeas, & Other Pending Cases for Cases Decided or to Be Decided in October Term 2014 1. CASES RAISING CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTIONS First Amendment Elonis v.
    [Show full text]
  • Death Row USA Winter 2016
    DEATH ROW U.S.A. Winter 2016 A quarterly report by the Criminal Justice Project of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. Deborah Fins, Esq. Consultant to the Criminal Justice Project NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. Death Row U.S.A. Winter 2016 (As of January 1, 2016) TOTAL NUMBER OF DEATH ROW INMATES KNOWN TO LDF: 2,943 Race of Defendant: White 1,251 (42.51%) Black 1,227 (41.69%) Latino/Latina 383 (13.01%) Native American 30 (1.02%) Asian 51 (1.73%) Unknown at this issue 1 (0.03%) Gender: Male 2,888 (98.13%) Female 55 (1.87%) JURISDICTIONS WITH CURRENT DEATH PENALTY STATUTES: 34 Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, Wyoming, U.S. Government, U.S. Military. JURISDICTIONS WITHOUT DEATH PENALTY STATUTES: 19 Alaska, Connecticut, District of Columbia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico [see note below], New York, North Dakota, Rhode Island, Vermont, West Virginia, Wisconsin. [NOTE: New Mexico repealed the death penalty prospectively. The men already sentenced remain under sentence of death.] Death Row U.S.A. Page 1 In the United States Supreme Court Update to Summer 2015 Issue of Significant Criminal, Habeas, & Other Pending Cases for Cases to Be Decided in October Term 2015 1. CASES RAISING CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTIONS Fourth Amendment Bernard v. Minnesota, No. 14-1470 (Criminalization of refusal to take blood alcohol test) (decision below 859 N.W.2d 762 (Minn.
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court of Tennessee at JACKSON ______
    No. W2009-01255-SC-DDT-DD IN THE Supreme Court of Tennessee AT JACKSON _____________ STATE OF TENNESSEE, Appellee, vs. CORINIO PRUITT, Appellant. _____________ APPEAL FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON NO. W2009-01255-CCA-R3-DD CRIMINAL COURT FOR SHELBY COUNTY NO. 06-00460 _____________ BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE TENNESSEE ASSOCIATION OF CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYERS, AND THE CONSTITUTION PROJECT _____________ RUSSELL CASS ERIC G. OSBORNE* (BPR # 029719) DANIEL GREENFIELD SEEMA KAKAD JAIN SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP One South Dearborn 1501 K Street, N.W. Chicago, IL 60603 Washington, D.C. 20005 (312) 853-7000 (202) 736-8000 Counsel for Amici Curiae March 4, 2013 * Counsel of Record (Additional Counsel Listed on Inside Cover) LA1 2659112v.9 MARY SCHMID MERGLER COLLIN P. WEDEL THE CONSTITUTION PROJECT SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 1200 18th Street, N.W. 555 W. Fifth Street Suite 1000 Suite 4000 Washington, D.C. 20036 Los Angeles, CA 90013 (202) 580-6920 (213) 896-6600 WADE V. DAVIES (BPR #016052) ROB MCKINNEY (BPR #016807) RITCHIE, DILLARD, DAVIES & Attorney at Law JOHNSON, P.C. 214 2nd Avenue North 606 W. Main Street Suite 103 Suite 300 Nashville, TN 37201 Knoxville, TN 37902 (615) 686-2115 (865) 637-0661 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF AUTHORITIESError! Bookmark not defined. INTEREST OF THE AMICI CURIAE .............................. xi STATEMENT OF ISSUE .................................................... 1 STATEMENT OF THE CASE ............................................ 1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ............................................. 2 ARGUMENT ........................................................................ 5 I. Imposing a Death Sentence on a Defendant Who Never Formed the Intent to Kill Violates the Proportionality Principle of the Federal and Tennessee Constitutions Because of Its Exceeding Rarity.
    [Show full text]
  • Death Row U.S.A
    DEATH ROW U.S.A. Fall 2018 A quarterly report by the Criminal Justice Project of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. Deborah Fins Consultant to the Criminal Justice Project NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. Death Row U.S.A. Fall 2018 (As of October 1, 2018) TOTAL NUMBER OF DEATH ROW INMATES KNOWN TO LDF: 2,721 Race of Defendant: White 1,144 (42.04%) Black 1,130 (41.53%) Latino/Latina 366 (13.45%) Native American 28 (1.03%) Asian 52 (1.91%) Unknown at this issue 1 (0.04%) Gender: Male 2,666 (97.98%) Female 55 (2.02%) JURISDICTIONS WITH CURRENT DEATH PENALTY STATUTES: 33 Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, Wyoming, U.S. Government, U.S. Military. JURISDICTIONS WITHOUT DEATH PENALTY STATUTES: 20 Alaska, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico [see note below], New York, North Dakota, Rhode Island, Vermont, West Virginia, Wisconsin. [NOTE: New Mexico repealed the death penalty prospectively. The men already sentenced remain under sentence of death.] Death Row U.S.A. Page 1 In the United States Supreme Court Update to Summer 2018 Issue of Significant Criminal, Habeas, & Other Pending Cases for Cases to Be Decided in October Term 2018 1. CASES RAISING CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTIONS Fourth Amendment Nieves v. Bartlett, No. 17-1174 (Probable cause to arrest) (decision below 712 Fed.Appx.
    [Show full text]
  • Death Row U.S.A
    DEATH ROW U.S.A. Summer 2015 A quarterly report by the Criminal Justice Project of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. Deborah Fins, Esq. Consultant to the Criminal Justice Project NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. Death Row U.S.A. Summer 2015 (As of July 1, 2015) TOTAL NUMBER OF DEATH ROW INMATES KNOWN TO LDF: 2,984 Race of Defendant: White 1,275 (42.73%) Black 1,243 (41.66%) Latino/Latina 385 (12.90%) Native American 30 (1.01%) Asian 50 (1.68%) Unknown at this issue 1 (0.03%) Gender: Male 2,930 (98.19%) Female 54 (1.81%) JURISDICTIONS WITH CURRENT DEATH PENALTY STATUTES: 34 Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, Wyoming, U.S. Government, U.S. Military. JURISDICTIONS WITHOUT DEATH PENALTY STATUTES: 19 Alaska, Connecticut [see note below], District of Columbia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico [see note below], New York, North Dakota, Rhode Island, Vermont, West Virginia, Wisconsin. [NOTE: Connecticut and New Mexico repealed the death penalty prospectively. The men already sentenced in each state remain under sentence of death.] Death Row U.S.A. Page 1 In the United States Supreme Court Update to Spring 2015 Issue of Significant Criminal, Habeas, & Other Pending Cases for Cases Decided or to Be Decided in October Term 2014 or 2015 1. CASES RAISING CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTIONS First Amendment Elonis v.
    [Show full text]