Dog Or Cat License

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Dog/Cat License Application Garrett County, Maryland Animal Control/Shelter In accordance with Article 24, Section 11-501 of the Annotated Code of Maryland (1957 Edition) as amended. A 50% penalty fee is imposed on all licenses not renewed or acquired by August 1st of each year. 1 Year License valid from July 1, 2020 to June 30, 2021 3 Year License valid from July 1, 2020 to June 30, 2023 Fees Before August 1st After August 1st 1 Year 3 Year 1 Year 3 Year Unspayed/Unneutered* $15.00 $45.00 $22.50 $67.50 Spayed/Neutered $3.00 $9.00 $4.50 $13.50 * Exceptions for newly acquired dogs/cats Owner Information Name Address City State Zip Phone Animal Information Additional animals available on second page Animal Name Male Female Spayed Neutered Breed Color/Markings Rabies Tag # Rabies Expiration If Mailing Please Attach a Copy of Valid Rabies Certificate. Absolutely No Dog License Issued Without a Valid Rabies Certificate Number. If Spayed/Neutered, Attach Copy of Certificate. Finalize Signature Mail or drop Animal Shelter Collection Office off locations 152 Oakland Sang Run Road 203 South 4th Street, Room 107A Oakland, MD 21550 Oakland, MD 21550 Make checks payable to Garrett County Commissioners. Do not send cash. Dog/Cat License Application Garrett County, Maryland Animal Control/Shelter Animal Name Male Female Spayed Neutered Breed Color/Markings Rabies Tag # Rabies Expiration Animal Name Male Female Spayed Neutered Breed Color/Markings Rabies Tag # Rabies Expiration Animal Name Male Female Spayed Neutered Breed Color/Markings Rabies Tag # Rabies Expiration Animal Name Male Female Spayed Neutered Breed Color/Markings Rabies Tag # Rabies Expiration Animal Name Male Female Spayed Neutered Breed Color/Markings Rabies Tag # Rabies Expiration Animal Name Male Female Spayed Neutered Breed Color/Markings Rabies Tag # Rabies Expiration Animal Name Male Female Spayed Neutered Breed Color/Markings Rabies Tag # Rabies Expiration .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Black Bear Tracking Dog License Application (PDF)
For Office Use Only LICENSE DURATION 1 Year or 5Years Black Bear License # ________________ Fee Paid $ _______________ LICENSE FEE Tracking Dog License ☐ ☐ $25.00 1 Year Check # _____________ Application ☐ 00 $100. 5 Year ☐ M.O. # ______________ For more information on this license visit www.dec.ny.gov/permits/25006.html *APPLICANT INFORMATION name / date of birth ____________________________________________ _____________________________________ _________ ___________________ Last First M.I. DOB (mm/dd/yyyy) address _______________________________________ _______________ ________________________________________________________ Street Address Apartment/Unit City ______________________________________________________________________________ ________________ ______________________ County State Zip Code email / ____________________________________________________________________________________ ( _________ ) _________ - ______________ telephone Email Telephone *Provide your NYS Hunting License ID # (must be current year license) *FACILITY / BUSINESS INFORMATION (Complete this section if different from above.) facility / business name ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ address _________________________________________ _______________ _____________________________________________________ Street Address Apartment/Unit City _______________________________________ ___________ ___________________ ( _________ ) __________ - ________________ County State Zip
[Show full text]
Long-Term Trends in Food Habits of the Raccoon Dog, Nyctereutes Viverrinus, in the Imperial Palace, Tokyo
Bull. Natl. Mus. Nat. Sci., Ser. A, 42(3), pp. 143–161, August 22, 2016 Long-term Trends in Food Habits of the Raccoon Dog, Nyctereutes viverrinus, in the Imperial Palace, Tokyo Akihito1, Takako Sako2, Makito Teduka3 and Shin-ichiro Kawada4* 1The Imperial Residence, 1–1 Chiyoda, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100–0001, Japan 2Imperial Household Agency, 1–1 Chiyoda, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100–8111, Japan 3Field Work Office, 4–29–2 Asahi-cho, Akishima, Tokyo 196–0025, Japan 4 Department of Zoology, National Museum of Nature and Science, 4–1–1 Amakubo, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305–0005, Japan *E-mail: [email protected] (Received 31 March 2016; accepted 22 June 2016) Abstract The food habits of the raccoon dogs in the Imperial Palace were examined by fecal analysis focused on the long term trend for five years. A total of 95 taxa (including 58 taxa identi- fied as genera or species) of plant seeds were detected from 163 collected feces in 164 weekly sur- veys. Among them, eight taxa were selected as the food resources for the raccoon dogs in the Imperial Palace. The intakes of these taxa showed seasonal succession, i.e. Aphananthe aspera in January, Idesia polycarpa in February, Rubus hirsutus from May to July, Cerasus spp. in May and June, Morus spp. in June, Machilus thunbergii in July and August, Aphananthe aspera from Sep- tember to December until the following January, and also Ficus erecta in September and Celtis sinensis in December. In March and April, plant harvest is rather poor, and therefore raccoon dogs feed on the inside endosperm of Ginkgo biloba and family Fagaceae to supply the insufficient nutrients as observed by broken seed coats from feces.
[Show full text]
Glimpse of an African… Wolf? Cécile Bloch
$6.95 Glimpse of an African… Wolf ? PAGE 4 Saving the Red Wolf Through Partnerships PAGE 9 Are Gray Wolves Still Endangered? PAGE 14 Make Your Home Howl Members Save 10% Order today at shop.wolf.org or call 1-800-ELY-WOLF Your purchases help support the mission of the International Wolf Center. VOLUME 25, NO. 1 THE QUARTERLY PUBLICATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL WOLF CENTER SPRING 2015 4 Cécile Bloch 9 Jeremy Hooper 14 Don Gossett In the Long Shadow of The Red Wolf Species Survival Are Gray Wolves Still the Pyramids and Beyond: Plan: Saving the Red Wolf Endangered? Glimpse of an African…Wolf? Through Partnerships In December a federal judge ruled Geneticists have found that some In 1967 the number of red wolves that protections be reinstated for of Africa’s golden jackals are was rapidly declining, forcing those gray wolves in the Great Lakes members of the gray wolf lineage. remaining to breed with the more wolf population area, reversing Biologists are now asking: how abundant coyote or not to breed at all. the USFWS’s 2011 delisting many golden jackals across Africa The rate of hybridization between the decision that allowed states to are a subspecies known as the two species left little time to prevent manage wolves and implement African wolf? Are Africa’s golden red wolf genes from being completely harvest programs for recreational jackals, in fact, wolves? absorbed into the expanding coyote purposes. If biological security is population. The Red Wolf Recovery by Cheryl Lyn Dybas apparently not enough rationale for Program, working with many other conservation of the species, then the organizations, has created awareness challenge arises to properly express and laid a foundation for the future to the ecological value of the species.
[Show full text]
Ecology of the European Badger (Meles Meles) in the Western Carpathian Mountains: a Review
Wildl. Biol. Pract., 2016 Aug 12(3): 36-50 doi:10.2461/wbp.2016.eb.4 REVIEW Ecology of the European Badger (Meles meles) in the Western Carpathian Mountains: A Review R.W. Mysłajek1,*, S. Nowak2, A. Rożen3, K. Kurek2, M. Figura2 & B. Jędrzejewska4 1 Institute of Genetics and Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw, Pawińskiego 5a, 02-106 Warszawa, Poland. 2 Association for Nature “Wolf”, Twardorzeczka 229, 34-324 Lipowa, Poland. 3 Institute of Environmental Sciences, Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa 7, 30-387 Kraków, Poland. 4 Mammal Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Waszkiewicza 1c, 17-230 Białowieża, Poland. * Corresponding author email: [email protected]. Keywords Abstract Altitudinal Gradient; This article summarizes the results of studies on the ecology of the European Diet Composition; badger (Meles meles) conducted in the Western Carpathians (S Poland) Meles meles; from 2002 to 2010. Badgers inhabiting the Carpathians use excavated setts Mustelidae; (53%), caves and rock crevices (43%), and burrows under human-made Sett Utilization; constructions (4%) as permanent shelters. Excavated setts are located up Spatial Organization. to 640 m a.s.l., but shelters in caves and crevices can be found as high as 1,050 m a.s.l. Badger setts are mostly located on slopes with southern, eastern or western exposure. Within their territories, ranging from 3.35 to 8.45 km2 (MCP100%), badgers may possess 1-12 setts. Family groups are small (mean = 2.3 badgers), population density is low (2.2 badgers/10 km2), as is reproduction (0.57 young/year/10 km2). Hunting by humans is the main mortality factor (0.37 badger/year/10 km2).
[Show full text]
Human-Black Bear Conflict a Review of the Most Common Management Practices
HUMAN-BLACK BEAR CONFLICT A REVIEW OF THE MOST COMMON MANAGEMENT PRACTICES A black bear in Lake Tahoe, NV. Photo courtesy Urbanbearfootage.com 1 A black bear patrols downtown Carson City, NV. Photo courtesy Heiko De Groot 2 Authors Carl W. Lackey (Nevada Department of Wildlife) Stewart W. Breck (USDA-WS-National Wildlife Research Center) Brian Wakeling (Nevada Department of Wildlife; Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies) Bryant White (Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies) 3 Table of Contents Preface Acknowledgements Introduction . The North American Model of Wildlife Conservation and human-bear conflicts . “I Hold the Smoking Gun” by Chris Parmeter Status of the American Black Bear . Historic and Current distribution . Population estimates and human-bear conflict data Status of Human-Black Bear Conflict . Quantifying Conflict . Definition of Terms Associated with Human-Bear Management Methods to Address Human-Bear Conflicts . Public Education . Law and Ordinance Enforcement . Exclusionary Methods . Capture and Release . Aversive Conditioning . Repellents . Damage Compensation Programs . Supplemental & Diversionary Feeding . Depredation (Kill) Permits . Management Bears (Agency Kill) . Privatized Conflict Management Population Management . Regulated Hunting and Trapping . Control of Non-Hunting Mortality . Fertility Control . Habitat Management . No Intervention Agency Policy Literature Cited 4 Abstract Most human-black bear (Ursus americanus) conflict occurs when people make anthropogenic foods (that is, foods of human origin like trash, dog food, domestic poultry, or fruit trees) available to bears. Bears change their behavior to take advantage of these resources and in the process may damage property or cause public safety concerns. Managers are often forced to focus efforts on reactive non-lethal and lethal bear management techniques to solve immediate problems, which do little to address root causes of human-bear conflict.
[Show full text]
(2019) Old World Canis Spp. with Taxonomic Ambiguity: Workshop Conclusions
Old World Canis spp. with taxonomic ambiguity: Workshop conclusions and recommendations Vairão, Portugal, 28th - 30th May 2019 Francisco Alvares1*, Wieslaw Bogdanowicz2, Liz A.D. Campbell3, Raquel Godinho1, Jennifer Hatlauf4, Yadvendradev V. Jhala5, Andrew C. Kitchener6, Klaus-Peter Koepfli7, Miha Krofel8, Helen Senn9, Claudio Sillero-Zubiri3,10, Suvi Viranta11, and Geraldine Werhahn3,10 1 CIBIO-InBIO, Research Center in Biodiversity and Genetic Resources from Porto University, Vairão, Portugal. Email: [email protected] 2 Polish Academy of Sciences Poland. 3 Wildlife Conservation Research Unit (WildCRU), Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, UK 4 Institute of Wildlife Biology and Game Management, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences (BOKU), Vienna, Austria. 5 Wildlife Institute of India, India 6 National Museums Scotland, Department of Natural Sciences, Chambers Street, Edinburgh, EH1 1JF, UK 7 Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, Center for Species Survival, Washington, D.C. USA 8 Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia 9 Royal Zoological Society of Scotland, Edinburgh, UK 10 IUCN SSC Canid specialist Group, Oxford, UK 11 University of Helsinki, Finland * Convener Introduction In response to a need for answers to questions regarding the taxonomy of several Old World Canis taxa, a work- shop of experts in taxonomy, evolution, biology and conservation of the Canidae took place in Vairão, Portugal, on 28th-30th May 2019, organised by CIBIO-InBIO and the IUCN SSC Canid Specialist Group. See appendix
[Show full text]
From Wolf to Dog: Behavioural Evolution During Domestication
FROM WOLF TO DOG: BEHAVIOURAL EVOLUTION DURING DOMESTICATION Christina Hansen Wheat From wolf to dog: Behavioural evolution during domestication Christina Hansen Wheat ©Christina Hansen Wheat, Stockholm University 2018 ISBN print 978-91-7797-272-3 ISBN PDF 978-91-7797-273-0 Printed in Sweden by Universitetsservice US-AB, Stockholm 2018 Distributor: Department of Zoology, Stockholm University Cover photo: "Iggy & Janis" ©Christina Hansen Wheat Gallery, all photos ©Christina Hansen Wheat “All his life he tried to be a good person. Many times, however, he failed. For after all, he was only human. He wasn’t a dog.” – Charles M. Schulz FROM WOLF TO DOG: BEHAVIOURAL EVOLUTION DURING DOMESTICATION - LIST OF PAPERS - The thesis is based on the following articles, which are referred to in the text by their Roman numerals: I Wheat C. Hansen, Fitzpatrick J. & Temrin H. Behaviours of the domestication syndrome are decoupled in modern dog breeds. Submitted manuscript, reviewed and in revision for Nature Communications II Wheat C. Hansen, Fitzpatrick J., Tapper I. & Temrin H. (2018). Wolf (Canis lupus) hybrids highlight the importance of human- directed play behaviour during domestication of dogs (Canis familiaris). Journal of Comparative Psychology, in press III Wheat C. Hansen, Berner P., Larsson I., Tapper I. & Temrin H. Key behaviours in the domestication syndrome do not develop simultaneously in wolves and dogs. Manuscript IV Wheat C. Hansen, Van der Bijl W. & Temrin H. Dogs, but not wolves, lose their sensitivity towards novelty with age. Manuscript. Candidate contributions to thesis articles* I II III IV Conceived Significant Significant Substantial Substantial the study Designed the study Substantial Substantial Substantial Substantial Collected the data NA NA Significant Substantial Analysed the data Substantial Substantial Significant Significant Manuscript preparation Substantial Substantial Substantial Substantial * Contribution Explanation.
[Show full text]
What's Wild About African Wild Dogs?
Skill – Reading Comprehension Name: _________________________ What’s Wild About African Wild Dogs? By: Catherine Clarke Fox What’s the difference between African wild dogs and the dogs we know as pets? For one thing, African wild dogs, which live in Africa, south of the Sahara desert, only have four toes, while domestic dogs and wolves have five. But you wouldn’t want to count for yourself, because these are truly wild animals. Wild dogs are not somebody's domestic dogs that ran away and didn't come back, although some people used to think that," explains Dr. "Tico" McNutt, who studies these animals at Wild Dog Research Camp in the African country of Botswana. "They are actually Africa's wolf, and just like wolves, they do not make good pets. They need to be out in the wild doing what they are supposed to be doing - ranging many miles every day and hunting to find the food they need to survive and feed pups." In fact, they travel so far that researchers use radio collars to keep track of them. The collars send out radio signals that tell people where the dogs are. African wild dogs are a separate species from domestic dogs: Lycaon pictus, which means painted, wolf-like animal. No two wild dogs have the same pattern to their coats, so it is easy to tell them apart. Roaming through grasslands, savannas, and wooded areas, they hunt gazelles and other antelopes, baby wildebeests, warthogs, birds, and rats. Incredible hunters, they can run up to 35 miles per hour (56 kilometers per hour).
[Show full text]
Dog and Cat Protection Act
Commercial Enforcement Division Dog and Cat Protection Act U. S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Penalties Any person who violates the act may be enforces the Dog and Cat Protection Act which assessed a civil penalty of up to $10,000 for each includes detecting and prohibiting illegal separate knowing and intention of violation, $5,000 for international trade of dog and cat fur products each separate gross negligence violation, or $3,000 for imported into the United States. To fulfill its mission, each separate negligent violation. CBP analyzes trade data and uses a risk-based approach to identify the highest risk imports. CBP Debarment When an entity has been found to have officers perform examinations of potentially violative committed a knowing and intentional or a gross imports at U.S. ports of entry. negligent violation of the act, the entity may be prohibited from importing, exporting, transporting, The Dog and Cat Protection Act Pursuant to 19 distributing, manufacturing or selling any fur product U.S.C. § 1308, the act prohibits the importation and in the U.S. exportation of any dog or cat fur products into and out of the U.S. More specifically, the act makes it illegal Publication A list of the names of any producer, to introduce, manufacture, sell, trade, offer to sell, manufacturer, supplier, seller, importer or exporter advertise, transport or distribute dog and cat fur found to have committed a knowing and intentional or product in the interstate commerce of the U.S. CBP a gross negligent violation of the act will be published partners with Immigration and Customs Enforcement, in the Federal Register.
[Show full text]
Conserving the Endangered Asiatic Wild Dog Cuon Alpinus in Western Arunachal Pradesh
Technical Report: TR2010/002 Conserving the endangered Asiatic wild dog Cuon Alpinus in Western Arunachal Pradesh Fostering Better Coexistence For Conservation Gopi.G.V, Salvador Lyngdoh and K. Muthamizh Selvan 2 0 1 0 Conserving the endangered Asiatic wild dog Cuon Alpinus in Western Arunachal Pradesh Fostering Better Coexistence For Conservation Project Leader Gopi.G.V Research Fellows Salvador Lyngdoh K. Muthamizh Selvan Supported by This report may be quoted freely but the source must be acknowledged and to be cited as: Gopi.G.V, Salvador Lyngdoh and K. Muthamizh Selvan (2010). Conserving the endangered Asiatic Wild Dog Cuon alpinus in Western Arunachal Pradesh: fostering better coexistence for conservation. Final Technical Report Submitted to Rufford Small Grant Program, UK. 54 pp. Cover photograph (Dhole): © KALYAN VARMA Rest of the photographs: © GOPI. G. V Copy can be obtained from Gopi.G.V The Rufford Small Grant Foundation Scientist 6th Floor Department of Endangered Species 248 Tottenham Court Road management London W1T 7QZ Wildlife Institute of India Email: [email protected] Post Box 18, Chandrabani www.ruffordsmallgrants.org Dehradun 248 001, India Email: [email protected] CONTENTS Page No Acknowledgement Executive Summary Chapter 1 1.1 Origin of work 1 1.2 Justification of this study 1 1.3 Objectives 2 1.4 Organization of the report 2 Chapter 2 2.1 Introduction 3 2.2 Study area 6 2.3 Methods 6 2.4 Results 10 2.5 Discussion 17 Chapter 3 3.1 Introduction 19 3.2 Study area 21 3.3 Methodology 21 3.4 Results 22 3.5 Discussion 33 Chapter 4 4.1 Brochures 35 4.2 Posters 36 4.3 Banner 36 4.4 Stakeholders awareness workshops 37 References 39 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I wish to acknowledge my indebtedness to the Rufford Small Grant Foundation for providing the necessary fund support to carry out a study on Wild dogs in Indian part of the Eastern Himalaya.
[Show full text]
Report of Dog and Cat Fur Trade in China
REPORT OF DOG AND CAT Action • Compassion • Together FUR TRADE IN CHINA 1 22 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 5 1.1 Purpose of Report 6 1.2 Objectives 7 1.3 Methodology 7 2. INVESTIGATIONS: THE DOG AND CAT FUR TRADE IN CHINA 8 2.1 Source of animals 9 2.2 Financial elements of dog and cat sales 12 2.3 Quantity and availability 14 2.4 Transportation 16 3. PRODUCTION 19 3.1 Slaughter 19 3.2 Products and sales 20 3.3 Labeling 22 3.4. Export 25 4. CONCLUSION 27 ACTAsia thanks Dogs Trust for their support in the production of this report Copyright © ACTAsia for Animals 2017 A dog is suspended by its tail, to be slaughtered for its fur with a bludgeon and knife. 2 3 ACTAsia’s Cruelty Free Fashion Show in Beijing. 44 I. INTRODUCTION China is the largest fur trading and processing country in the world, producing 75% of all furs sourced globally1. The demand for fur products is growing with the rise in economic standards and online marketing by fur retailers. Traditionally adults were the main consumers of fur products, but the market has more recently expanded into children’s fashions. Unlike in western countries, dogs and cats are openly used as a source for fur products in China. The animal welfare implications of the fur trade are significant, and of growing concern as the industry expands. Most Chinese fur farms have been established in the last 10 to 15 years, and include dog, cat, fox, mink, raccoon dog and rabbit.
[Show full text]
Introducing Your New Dog to Your Resident Cat
Introducing Your New Dog to Your Resident Cat Never leave your dog and cat alone unsupervised as dogs can kill a cat very easily, even if they’re only playing. All it takes is one shake and the cat’s neck can break. Many dogs want to chase and play with cats, and cats usually become afraid and defensive. Before introducing your new dog to your resident cat, keep them isolated until you get to know your dog and have had a chance to do some preparation and training. Be prepared for the introduction to take several days, or more, and let the cat set the pace. Remember to always proceed slowly and safely, giving your cat space to get away from the situation. Avoid any interactions between your pets that result in either fearful or aggressive behavior. If these responses are allowed to become a habit, they can be difficult to change. It's better to introduce your pets to each other so gradually that neither animal becomes afraid or aggressive. You can expect mild forms of these behaviors, but don't give them the opportunity to intensify. If either animal becomes fearful or aggressive, separate them, and start over with the introduction process in a series of very small, gradual steps. Set-up Give your resident cat a ‘safe room’, with access to food, water, litter box and bed, where she can be safe and secure from the dog. Your new dog should have a ‘confinement area’, where he is kept when you’re not able to pay 100% attention to his behavior as he settles in to a new house.
[Show full text]