DOCSLIB.ORG

121214 FINAL Stanisic FTB Redacted Master Copy 130228__Le…

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
121214 FINAL Stanisic FTB Redacted Master Copy 130228__Le… IT-03-69-T 48575 D48575 - D48137 01 March 2013 MB UNITED NATIONS International Tribunal for the Case No.: IT-03-69-T Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of Date: 28 February 2013 International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of the former Yugoslavia since 1991 IN TRIAL CHAMBER I Before: Judge Alphons Orie, Presiding Judge Michèle Picard Judge Elizabeth Gwaunza Registrar: Mr. John Hocking THE PROSECUTOR v. JOVICA STANIŠIĆ and FRANKO SIMATOVIĆ Public with Public Annexes A-E P U B L I C R E D A C T E D V E R S I O N O F P ROSECUTION F I N A L T R I A L B RIEF The Office of the Prosecutor: Mr. Dermot Groome Ms. Maxine Marcus Mr. Travis Farr Ms. Rachel Friedman Ms. Grace Harbour Mr. Adam Weber Mr. Kyle Wood Counsel for Jovica Stani{i}: Mr. Wayne Jordash Mr. Scott Martin Counsel for Franko Simatovi}: Mr. Mihajlo Bakrač Mr. Vladimir Petrovi} 48574 THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE FORMER YUGOSLAVIA IT-03-69-T THE PROSECUTOR v. JOVICA STANIŠIĆ and FRANKO SIMATOVIĆ Public with Public Annexes A-E P U B L I C R E D A C T E D V E R S I O N O F P ROSECUTION F I N A L T R I A L B RIEF On 14 December 2012 the Prosecution filed its Final Trial Brief and five annexes ∗ confidentially. The following is a public redacted copy of this filing. Pursuant to Rule 86 of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence the Prosecution submits its Final Trial Brief with the following Annexes: i. Public Redacted Annex A: Index of Persons with a Significant Relationship to the State Security Service of Serbia. ii. Public Redacted Annex B: Payments Made by the Serbian State Security Service iii. Public Redacted Annex C: Index of the Prosecution Final Trial Brief iv. Public Annex D: Glossary of Terms and Abbreviations v. Public Annex E: Table of Authorities ∗ The Prosecution has redacted the following types of material: 1. References to protected witnesses upon whose evidence a particular assertion in the brief relies. 2. Passages of text containing quoted or paraphrased material from testimony and documents that are confidential. The Prosecution has not redacted assertions that are based on confidential evidence unless such is necessary to protect the interest and purpose underlying the confidential status. The Prosecution has not redacted public testimony that is formally confidential but for which public versions will be filed in compliance with orders of the Chamber (“PPCE” material). 3. In Annexes A and B the entries for individuals whose relationship with the SMUP-DB was only established with confidential evidence have been redacted in full. 4. Index entries for all Prosecution and Defence witnesses and exhibits. IT-03-69-T 2 28 February 2013 48573 Conventions Used in the Prosecution Final Trial Brief 1. At the heart of this case lies a complex and covert network of the Serbian State Security Service presided over by Jovica STANIŠIĆ and Franko SIMATOVIĆ. They used this network to secretly pour men, materiel and know-how into Croatia and BiH to execute crimes in furtherance of the criminal plan they shared with others. 2. To assist the reader in better understanding this, the Prosecution throughout this Brief identifies those who were either paid by or were under the command of the SMUP-DB by placing “DB” in subscript after the person’s name. For example Zoran RAIĆ(DB) will be indicated as RAIĆ(DB) when he is referred to in the brief. Annex A contains an index of all of these relevant persons and summarises their relationship to the SMUP-DB and their particular role in the events as well as cross references to where in the brief their role is discussed in greater detail. Annex B is a table which summarises the exhibits demonstrating payments to many of these individuals. This list is not exhaustive, but an enumeration of people who meet this criteria and are discussed in this Brief. 3. This brief employs a similar convention to identify the members of the Joint Criminal Enterprise alleged in the indictment. These individuals will be identified by placing a “JCE” in subscript after the person’s name. For example, Veljko KADIJEVIĆ will be indicated as KADIJEVIĆ(JCE). This designation will be dropped in passages that contain frequent references to the same person. 4. The phrase “the Accused” when used in this brief, refers to both Jovica STANIŠIĆ and Franko SIMATOVIĆ collectively. 5. The structure of footnotes is intended to provide the reader with information that may assist in understanding the evidence. The witness who gave particular evidence will appear at the beginning of a string cite in bold with a “:” to indicate which exhibits a particular witness addressed. Individual exhibits are separated by a “;” and a “.” indicates the end of exhibits related to a particular witness. This brief identifies whether evidence is public or confidential. In those cases in which the evidence consists of publicly available evidence placed under seal by the Chamber the Prosecution will indicate this in footnotes as public portions of confidential evidence (PPCE).1 To avoid repetition the Prosecution has made use of cross-references. These are indicated in the footnotes by underline. 1 The Trial Chamber by its Citation Decision granted the Prosecution permission to cite this category of evidence publicly. IT-03-69-T 3 28 February 2013 48572 6. Orders of the Chamber required the Prosecution to assign and refer to protected witnesses who gave live testimony by pseudonyms unique to this case. In many cases the Prosecution has adduced evidence provided by these witnesses in earlier trials in which they were assigned different pseudonyms. The Prosecution recalls its filing of 23 February 2010 which enumerates these witnesses and their several pseudonyms which may assist the Defence and the Chambers.2 To indicate that certain testimonial evidence was given in a prior trial without identifying the particular trial the Prosecution will identify such evidence using “PriorT.####”. 7. An SMUP-DB employee with the name Zoran RAIĆ features prominently in the evidence in this case. The correct spelling of his name, as reflected in his official identification card is “RAIĆ.”3 Some of the documentary evidence in the case has RAIĆ’s name spelled phonetically and incorrectly as “RAJIĆ.” The transcript of the trial also uses this incorrect spelling, an error the Prosecution did not appreciate before it received a copy of Zoran RAIĆ’s official identification card. Whenever the Prosecution refers to RAIĆ in this brief it is referring to person recorded as RAJIĆ in the transcript and documentary evidence. Words (including Annex A)4: 112,989 Respectfully submitted, ______________________ Dermot Groome Senior Trial Attorney Dated this 28th day of February, 2013 At The Hague, The Netherlands 2 Witnesses: C-015, C-1118, B1108 and B-1048, who testified prior to this date are referred to by their previous pseudonyms. 3 See, P2978, p.4 (public). 4 The word count includes all of the text in the main body of the brief as well as in Annex A. Practice Direction IT/184.2 (16 September 2005) directs what text should be included and what text should be excluded from a word count. Pursuant to the practice direction, the text in Annexes B-E have not been included in the word count of the brief. IT-03-69-T 4 28 February 2013 48571 S U M M A R Y O F C ONTENTS Introduction........................................................................................................................................17 Summary of the Facts ................................................................................................................................17 Summary of the Charges ...........................................................................................................................20 Section 1: The Accused Were Part of a JCE to Forcibly and Permanently Remove the Majority of Non-Serbs from Parts of Croatia and BiH..................................................................................23 Overview......................................................................................................................................................23 Implementation of the JCE in SAO-Krajina ...........................................................................................25 Implementation of the JCE in SAO-SBWS..............................................................................................35 Continued Implementation of the JCE after the RSK was formed.......................................................48 Implementation of the JCE in BiH ...........................................................................................................51 Membership of the Joint Criminal Enterprise ........................................................................................71 The JCE Was a Single Criminal Enterprise Spanning Several Years and Several Regions...............80 Section 2: The Accused and the Special Units of the Serbian State Security Service .................82 Jovica STANIŠIĆ........................................................................................................................................82 Franko SIMATOVIĆ aka FRENKI .........................................................................................................84 The Special Units of the SMUP-DB ..........................................................................................................87 Section 3: The Charged Crimes Were Committed in Furtherance of the Common Criminal Purpose..............................................................................................................................................169
Load more

Recommended publications
  • YUGOSLAVIA Official No
    YUGOSLAVIA Official No. : C. 169. M. 99. 1939. Conf. E. V. R. 23. Geneva, August 1939. LEAGUE OF NATIONS EUROPEAN CONFERENCE O N RURAL LIFE National Monographs drawn up by Governments YUGOSLAVIA Series of League of Nations Publications EUROPEAN CONFERENCE « « O N RURAL LIFE ^ « 5 Peasant from the Cettinje neighbourhood (Montenegro). TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I n t r o d u c t io n ................................................................................................ 5 I. P op u lation : General C onsiderations............................ g II. A griculture : Structure........................................................ 16 III. A grarian R e f o r m .................................................................. 18 1. Ancient Provinces of the Voivodine, Syrmia, Slavonia, Croatia and S lo v en ia .................... 18 2. Southern S e r b i a ......................................................... 19 3. Bosnia and H erzegovina.......................................... 19 4 . D a lm a tia ....................................................................... 19 IV. T echnical I mprovement of the So i l ....................... 21 V. Improvement of Live-stock and Plants .... 24 VI. A gricultural In d u st r ie s .................................................... 27 VII. L and Settlemen r .................................................................. 28 Technical and Cultural Propaganda in Country D i s t r i c t ............................................................................. 30 VIII. A gricultural Co-operation
    [Show full text]
  • UNDER ORDERS: War Crimes in Kosovo Order Online
    UNDER ORDERS: War Crimes in Kosovo Order online Table of Contents Acknowledgments Introduction Glossary 1. Executive Summary The 1999 Offensive The Chain of Command The War Crimes Tribunal Abuses by the KLA Role of the International Community 2. Background Introduction Brief History of the Kosovo Conflict Kosovo in the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia Kosovo in the 1990s The 1998 Armed Conflict Conclusion 3. Forces of the Conflict Forces of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia Yugoslav Army Serbian Ministry of Internal Affairs Paramilitaries Chain of Command and Superior Responsibility Stucture and Strategy of the KLA Appendix: Post-War Promotions of Serbian Police and Yugoslav Army Members 4. march–june 1999: An Overview The Geography of Abuses The Killings Death Toll,the Missing and Body Removal Targeted Killings Rape and Sexual Assault Forced Expulsions Arbitrary Arrests and Detentions Destruction of Civilian Property and Mosques Contamination of Water Wells Robbery and Extortion Detentions and Compulsory Labor 1 Human Shields Landmines 5. Drenica Region Izbica Rezala Poklek Staro Cikatovo The April 30 Offensive Vrbovac Stutica Baks The Cirez Mosque The Shavarina Mine Detention and Interrogation in Glogovac Detention and Compusory Labor Glogovac Town Killing of Civilians Detention and Abuse Forced Expulsion 6. Djakovica Municipality Djakovica City Phase One—March 24 to April 2 Phase Two—March 7 to March 13 The Withdrawal Meja Motives: Five Policeman Killed Perpetrators Korenica 7. Istok Municipality Dubrava Prison The Prison The NATO Bombing The Massacre The Exhumations Perpetrators 8. Lipljan Municipality Slovinje Perpetrators 9. Orahovac Municipality Pusto Selo 10. Pec Municipality Pec City The “Cleansing” Looting and Burning A Final Killing Rape Cuska Background The Killings The Attacks in Pavljan and Zahac The Perpetrators Ljubenic 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Framing Croatia's Politics of Memory and Identity
    Workshop: War and Identity in the Balkans and the Middle East WORKING PAPER WORKSHOP: War and Identity in the Balkans and the Middle East WORKING PAPER Author: Taylor A. McConnell, School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh Title: “KRVatska”, “Branitelji”, “Žrtve”: (Re-)framing Croatia’s politics of memory and identity Date: 3 April 2018 Workshop: War and Identity in the Balkans and the Middle East WORKING PAPER “KRVatska”, “Branitelji”, “Žrtve”: (Re-)framing Croatia’s politics of memory and identity Taylor McConnell, School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh Web: taylormcconnell.com | Twitter: @TMcConnell_SSPS | E-mail: [email protected] Abstract This paper explores the development of Croatian memory politics and the construction of a new Croatian identity in the aftermath of the 1990s war for independence. Using the public “face” of memory – monuments, museums and commemorations – I contend that Croatia’s narrative of self and self- sacrifice (hence “KRVatska” – a portmanteau of “blood/krv” and “Croatia/Hrvatska”) is divided between praising “defenders”/“branitelji”, selectively remembering its victims/“žrtve”, and silencing the Serb minority. While this divide is partially dependent on geography and the various ways the Croatian War for Independence came to an end in Dalmatia and Slavonia, the “defender” narrative remains preeminent. As well, I discuss the division of Croatian civil society, particularly between veterans’ associations and regional minority bodies, which continues to disrupt amicable relations among the Yugoslav successor states and places Croatia in a generally undesired but unshakable space between “Europe” and the Balkans. 1 Workshop: War and Identity in the Balkans and the Middle East WORKING PAPER Table of Contents Abstract ...................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Iii Acts Adopted Under Title V of the Eu Treaty
    19.6.2007EN Official Journal of the European Union L 157/23 III (Acts adopted under the EU Treaty) ACTS ADOPTED UNDER TITLE V OF THE EU TREATY COUNCIL DECISION 2007/423/CFSP of 18 June 2007 implementing Common Position 2004/293/CFSP renewing measures in support of the effective implementation of the mandate of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, crimes for which they have been indicted by the ICTY, or who are otherwise acting in a manner which could obstruct the ICTY's effective implementation of its mandate, should be listed. Having regard to Council Common Position 2004/293/CFSP (1), and in particular Article 2 thereof in conjunction with Article 23(2) of the Treaty on European Union, (4) The list contained in the Annex to Common Position 2004/293/CFSP should be amended accordingly, Whereas: HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS: Article 1 (1) By Common Position 2004/293/CFSP the Council The list of persons set out in the Annex to Common Position adopted measures to prevent the entry into, or transit 2004/293/CFSP shall be replaced by the list set out in the through, the territories of Member States of individuals Annex to this Decision. who are engaged in activities which help persons at large continue to evade justice for crimes for which they have Article 2 been indicted by the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), or who are otherwise This Decision shall take effect on the date of its adoption. acting in a manner which could obstruct the ICTY's effective implementation of its mandate.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Redacted Version of Prosecution Final Trial Brief
    IT-03-69-T 48575 D48575 - D48137 01 March 2013 MB UNITED NATIONS International Tribunal for the Case No.: IT-03-69-T Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of Date: 28 February 2013 International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of the former Yugoslavia since 1991 IN TRIAL CHAMBER I Before: Judge Alphons Orie, Presiding Judge Michèle Picard Judge Elizabeth Gwaunza Registrar: Mr. John Hocking THE PROSECUTOR v. JOVICA STANIŠIĆ and FRANKO SIMATOVIĆ Public with Public Annexes A-E P U B L I C R E D A C T E D V E R S I O N O F P ROSECUTION F I N A L T R I A L B RIEF The Office of the Prosecutor: Mr. Dermot Groome Ms. Maxine Marcus Mr. Travis Farr Ms. Rachel Friedman Ms. Grace Harbour Mr. Adam Weber Mr. Kyle Wood Counsel for Jovica Stani{i}: Mr. Wayne Jordash Mr. Scott Martin Counsel for Franko Simatovi}: Mr. Mihajlo Bakrač Mr. Vladimir Petrovi} 48574 THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE FORMER YUGOSLAVIA IT-03-69-T THE PROSECUTOR v. JOVICA STANIŠIĆ and FRANKO SIMATOVIĆ Public with Public Annexes A-E P U B L I C R E D A C T E D V E R S I O N O F P ROSECUTION F I N A L T R I A L B RIEF On 14 December 2012 the Prosecution filed its Final Trial Brief and five annexes ∗ confidentially. The following is a public redacted copy of this filing. Pursuant to Rule 86 of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence the Prosecution submits its Final Trial Brief with the following Annexes: i.
    [Show full text]
  • Serbia in 2001 Under the Spotlight
    1 Human Rights in Transition – Serbia 2001 Introduction The situation of human rights in Serbia was largely influenced by the foregoing circumstances. Although the severe repression characteristic especially of the last two years of Milosevic’s rule was gone, there were no conditions in place for dealing with the problems accumulated during the previous decade. All the mechanisms necessary to ensure the exercise of human rights - from the judiciary to the police, remained unchanged. However, the major concern of citizens is the mere existential survival and personal security. Furthermore, the general atmosphere in the society was just as xenophobic and intolerant as before. The identity crisis of the Serb people and of all minorities living in Serbia continued. If anything, it deepened and the relationship between the state and its citizens became seriously jeopardized by the problem of Serbia’s undefined borders. The crisis was manifest with regard to certain minorities such as Vlachs who were believed to have been successfully assimilated. This false belief was partly due to the fact that neighbouring Romania had been in a far worse situation than Yugoslavia during the past fifty years. In considerably changed situation in Romania and Serbia Vlachs are now undergoing the process of self identification though still unclear whether they would choose to call themselves Vlachs or Romanians-Vlachs. Considering that the international factor has become the main generator of change in Serbia, the Helsinki Committee for Human Rights in Serbia believes that an accurate picture of the situation in Serbia is absolutely necessary. It is essential to establish the differences between Belgrade and the rest of Serbia, taking into account its internal diversities.
    [Show full text]
  • La Garde Des Volontaires Serbes / Les Tigres D'arkan
    Serbie 2 octobre 2017 La Garde des volontaires serbes / Les Tigres d’Arkan Avertissement Ce document a été élaboré par la Division de l’Information, de la Documentation et des Recherches de l’Ofpra en vue de fournir des informations utiles à l’examen des demandes de protection internationale. Il ne prétend pas faire le traitement exhaustif de la problématique, ni apporter de preuves concluantes quant au fondement d’une demande de protection internationale particulière. Il ne doit pas être considéré comme une position officielle de l’Ofpra ou des autorités françaises. Ce document, rédigé conformément aux lignes directrices communes à l’Union européenne pour le traitement de l’information sur le pays d’origine (avril 2008) [cf. https://www.ofpra.gouv.fr/sites/default/files/atoms/files/lignes_directrices_europeennes.pdf ], se veut impartial et se fonde principalement sur des renseignements puisés dans des sources qui sont à la disposition du public. Toutes les sources utilisées sont référencées. Elles ont été sélectionnées avec un souci constant de recouper les informations. Le fait qu’un événement, une personne ou une organisation déterminée ne soit pas mentionné(e) dans la présente production ne préjuge pas de son inexistence. La reproduction ou diffusion du document n’est pas autorisée, à l’exception d’un usage personnel, sauf accord de l’Ofpra en vertu de l’article L. 335-3 du code de la propriété intellectuelle. Serbie : la Garde des volontaires serbes Table des matières 1. Historique de la Garde des volontaires serbes ........................................................ 3 1.1. Genèse ....................................................................................................... 3 1.2. Organisation et fonctionnement ..................................................................... 4 1.3.
    [Show full text]
  • Croatian Beekeepers Federation (CBF)
    Croatian Beekeepers Federation (CBF) About country • Country name - Republic of Croatia • Capital city - Zagreb • Total Area - 56,542.00 sq km • Population - 4.284.889 (2011) • Languages - Croatian 96%, other 4% (including Italian, Hungarian, Czech, Slovak, and German) Croatian Beekeepers Federation Croatian Beekeepers Federation(CBF) was founded on 12th of December in 1954. Back then, there were 12 cooperative associations and four beekeeping associations with approximately 116.000 beehives. One of the founders and the first president was the academician Ivo Tomašec. Current president is Vladimir Bilek. Aim: • development of beekeeping • promotion of beekeeping • increase the number of members • education... Present: • 150 cooperative associations with more than 7.000 members • more than 11.000 beekeepers in Register of beekeepers and apiaries • more than 550.000 beehives • production of 7.000 – 8.000 tons per year • more than 20 types of honey Croatian Beekeepers Federation Management of CBF: Assembly (local associations reprezentatives) Board of Directors (21 county reprezentatives) Commissions Administration: President, 2 vice presidents(from the Board of Directors) Administrative officers: - secretary - editor - accountant - subvention program leader Climate and geography On the territory of Croatia exist three microclimate zones: • Pannonian region (dry and hot summer) • Highland region (cold winter with lots of snow) • Mediterranean region (dry and hot summer). Beekeeping Type of beekeeping in Croatia: • hobby (80%) • additional
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Assessment for Croatia
    BIODIVERSITY ASSESSMENT FOR CROATIA Task Order No. 807 under the Biodiversity & Sustainable Forestry (BIOFOR) IQC USAID Contract No. LAG-I-00-99-00014-00 Submitted to: USAID/Croatia Submitted by: Chemonics International Inc. Washington, D.C. December 31, 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS Acronyms SECTION I Introduction I-1 SECTION II Status of Biodiversity II-1 A. Overview II-1 B. Major Landscapes, Ecosystems and Communities II-2 C. Species Diversity II-4 D. Agro-biodiversity II-7 E. Threats to Biodiversity II-8 SECTION III Status of Biodiversity Conservation III-1 A. Protected Areas III-1 B. Conservation outside Protected Areas III-3 C. Ex-situ Conservation III-4 SECTION IV Strategic and Policy Framework IV-1 A. Policy Framework IV-1 B. Institutional Framework (government, academic, NGOs, private sector) IV-3 C. Legislative Framework IV-5 D. International Biodiversity Conservation Projects IV-6 SECTION V Summary of Findings V-1 SECTION VI Recommendations for Improved Biodiversity Conservation VI-1 SECTION VII USAID/Croatia VII-1 A. Impact of USAID Program on Biodiversity VII-1 B. Recommendations for USAID/ Croatia VII-2 ANNEX A Sections 117 and 119 of the Foreign Assistance Act A-1 ANNEX B Scope of Work B-1 ANNEX C List of Contacts C-1 ANNEX D Map of Major Vegetation Types in Croatia D-1 ANNEX E List of Endangered Species for Croatia: Red Data List for Croatia E-1 ANNEX F Maps of Protected Areas in Croatia F-1 ANNEX G Bibliography G-1 ACRONYMS BIOFOR Biodiversity and Sustainable Forestry BSAP Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan CITES Convention
    [Show full text]
  • Official Journal L 162 Volume 46 of the European Union 1 July 2003
    ISSN 1725-2555 Official Journal L 162 Volume 46 of the European Union 1 July 2003 English edition Legislation Contents I Acts whose publication is obligatory Decision No 1151/2003/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 June 2003 amending Decision No 276/1999/EC adopting a multiannual Commun- ity action plan on promoting safer use of the Internet by combating illegal and harmful content on global networks ................................................................... 1 Decision No 1152/2003/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 June 2003 on computerising the movement and surveillance of excisable products 5 Commission Regulation (EC) No 1153/2003 of 30 June 2003 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables .................. 9 Commission Regulation (EC) No 1154/2003 of 30 June 2003 fixing the minimum selling prices for beef put up for sale under the first invitation to tender referred to in Regulation (EC) No 1032/2003 ............................................................................. 11 Commission Regulation (EC) No 1155/2003 of 30 June 2003 fixing the minimum selling prices for beef put up for sale under the first invitation to tender referred to in Regulation (EC) No 1034/2003 ............................................................................. 13 Commission Regulation (EC) No 1156/2003 of 30 June 2003 on the supply of cereals as food aid ............................................................................................. 15 Commission Regulation (EC) No 1157/2003 of 30 June 2003 amending Regulation (EC) No 2535/2001 laying down detailed rules for applying Council Regulation (EC) No 1255/1999 as regards the import arrangements for milk and milk prod- ucts and opening tariff quotas, and derogating from that Regulation ....................
    [Show full text]
  • Civil and Political Rights in Croatia
    Croatia Page 1 of 78 Recent Reports Support HRW About HRW Site Map CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS IN CROATIA Human Rights Watch/Helsinki Human Rights Watch Copyright © October 1995 by Human Rights Watch. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 95-75413 ISBN 1-56432-148-7 Human Rights Watch/Helsinki Human Rights Watch/Helsinki was established in 1978 to monitor and promote domestic and international compliance with the human rights provisions of the 1975 Helsinki Accords. It is affiliated with the International Helsinki Federation for Human Rights, which is based in Vienna, Austria. Holly Cartner is the executive director; Erika Dailey, Rachel Denber, Ivana Nizich and Christopher Panico are research associates; Ivan Lupis is the research assistant; Anne Kuper, Alexander Petrov and Lenee Simon are associates. Jonathan Fanton is the chair of the advisory committee and Alice Henkin is vice chair. HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH Human Rights Watch conducts regular, systematic investigations of human rights abuses in some seventy countries around the world. It addresses the human rights practices of governments of all political stripes, of all geopolitical alignments, and of all ethnic and religious persuasions. In internal wars it documents violations by both governments and rebel groups. Human Rights Watch defends freedom of thought and expression, due process and equal protection of the law; it documents and denounces murders, disappearances, torture, arbitrary imprisonment, exile, censorship and other abuses of internationally recognized human rights. Human Rights Watch began in 1978 with the founding of its Helsinki division. Today, it includes five divisions covering Africa, the Americas, Asia, the Middle East, as well as the signatories of the Helsinki accords.
    [Show full text]
  • 2009 Human Rights Report: Serbia Page 1 of 32
    2009 Human Rights Report: Serbia Page 1 of 32 Home » Under Secretary for Democracy and Global Affairs » Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor » Releases » Human Rights Reports » 2009 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices » Europe and Eurasia » Serbia 2009 Human Rights Report: Serbia BUREAU OF DEMOCRACY, HUMAN RIGHTS, AND LABOR 2009 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices March 11, 2010 The Republic of Serbia is a parliamentary democracy with approximately 7.5 million inhabitants. Boris Tadic was reelected president in February 2008. In May 2008 voters elected a new parliament in which some minority ethnic parties won seats. Observers considered both elections to be mostly in line with international standards. Civilian authorities generally maintained effective control of the security forces. The following human rights problems were reported: physical mistreatment of detainees by police; police corruption; inefficient and lengthy trials; harassment of journalists, human rights advocates, and others critical of the government; limitations on freedom of speech and religion; large numbers of internally displaced persons (IDPs); corruption in legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government; government failure to apprehend the two remaining fugitive war crimes suspects under indictment of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY); societal violence against women and children; societal intolerance and discrimination against minorities, particularly Roma and the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (LGBT) population; and trafficking in persons. RESPECT FOR HUMAN RIGHTS Section 1 Respect for the Integrity of the Person, Including Freedom From: a. Arbitrary or Unlawful Deprivation of Life The government or its agents did not commit any politically motivated killings. On November 13, the Belgrade District Court convicted Miljan Raicevic, a Belgrade police officer, for the March 19 killing of Djordje Zaric during a traffic stop.
    [Show full text]