Small Business Innovation Research (Sbir) & Small Business Technology Transfer (Sttr)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Small Business Innovation Research (Sbir) & Small Business Technology Transfer (Sttr) SBIR/STTR 2006-1 National Aeronautics and Space Administration SMALL BUSINESS INNOVATION RESEARCH (SBIR) & SMALL BUSINESS TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER (STTR) Program Solicitations Opening Date: July 7, 2006 Closing Date: September 7, 2006 The electronic version of this document is at: http://sbir.nasa.gov TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Program Description ............................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Introduction......................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Program Authority and Executive Order ............................................................................................................ 1 1.3 Program Management......................................................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Three-Phase Program.......................................................................................................................................... 2 1.5 Eligibility Requirements ..................................................................................................................................... 3 1.6 General Information............................................................................................................................................ 4 2. Definitions............................................................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Allocation of Rights Agreement ......................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Commercialization.............................................................................................................................................. 5 2.3 Cooperative Research or Research and Development (R/R&D) Agreement...................................................... 5 2.4 Cooperative Research or Research and Development (R/R&D) ........................................................................ 5 2.5 Essentially Equivalent Work............................................................................................................................... 5 2.6 Funding Agreement ............................................................................................................................................ 5 2.7 HUBZone-Owned SBC ...................................................................................................................................... 5 2.8 Innovation ........................................................................................................................................................... 6 2.9 Intellectual Property (IP)..................................................................................................................................... 6 2.10 Principal Investigator (PI)................................................................................................................................. 6 2.11 Research Institution (RI)................................................................................................................................... 6 2.12 Research or Research and Development (R/R&D)........................................................................................... 6 2.13 SBIR/STTR Technical Data.............................................................................................................................. 6 2.14 SBIR/STTR Technical Data Rights .................................................................................................................. 6 2.15 Small Business Concern (SBC) ....................................................................................................................... 7 2.16 Socially and Economically Disadvantaged Individual...................................................................................... 7 2.17 Socially and Economically Disadvantaged Small Business Concern ............................................................... 7 2.18 Subcontract ....................................................................................................................................................... 7 2.19 United States ..................................................................................................................................................... 7 2.20 Women-Owned Small Business........................................................................................................................ 7 3. Proposal Preparation Instructions and Requirements ....................................................................................... 8 3.1 Fundamental Considerations............................................................................................................................... 8 3.2 Phase 1 Proposal Requirements .......................................................................................................................... 8 3.3 Phase 2 Proposal Requirements ........................................................................................................................ 13 3.4 SBA Data Collection Requirement ................................................................................................................... 18 4. Method of Selection and Evaluation Criteria.................................................................................................... 19 4.1 Phase 1 Proposals.............................................................................................................................................. 19 4.2 Phase 2 Proposals.............................................................................................................................................. 20 4.3 Debriefing of Unsuccessful Offerors ................................................................................................................ 22 5. Considerations...................................................................................................................................................... 23 5.1 Awards.............................................................................................................................................................. 23 5.2 Phase 1 Reporting ............................................................................................................................................. 23 5.3 Payment Schedule for Phase 1.......................................................................................................................... 24 5.4 Release of Proposal Information....................................................................................................................... 24 5.5 Access to Proprietary Data by Non-NASA Personnel ...................................................................................... 24 5.6 Final Disposition of Proposals .......................................................................................................................... 24 5.7 Proprietary Information in the Proposal Submission ........................................................................................ 24 i 5.8 Limited Rights Information and Data................................................................................................................25 5.9 Cost Sharing ......................................................................................................................................................26 5.10 Profit or Fee.....................................................................................................................................................26 5.11 Joint Ventures and Limited Partnerships.........................................................................................................26 5.12 Similar Awards and Prior Work......................................................................................................................26 5.13 Contractor Commitments ................................................................................................................................26 5.14 Additional Information....................................................................................................................................27 5.15 Property and Facilities.....................................................................................................................................28 5.16 False Statements..............................................................................................................................................28 6. Submission of Proposals ......................................................................................................................................29 6.1 Submission Requirements .................................................................................................................................29 6.2 Submission Process ...........................................................................................................................................29 6.3 Deadline for Phase 1 Proposal Receipt..............................................................................................................30 6.4 Acknowledgment of Proposal Receipt ..............................................................................................................30
Recommended publications
  • The Uch Enmek Example(Altai Republic,Siberia)
    Faculty of Environmental Sciences Institute for Cartography Master Thesis Concept and Implementation of a Contextualized Navigable 3D Landscape Model: The Uch Enmek Example(Altai Republic,Siberia). Mussab Mohamed Abuelhassan Abdalla Born on: 7th December 1983 in Khartoum Matriculation number: 4118733 Matriculation year: 2014 to achieve the academic degree Master of Science (M.Sc.) Supervisors Dr.Nikolas Prechtel Dr.Sander Münster Submitted on: 18th September 2017 Faculty of Environmental Sciences Institute for Cartography Task for the preparation of a Master Thesis Name: Mussab Mohamed Abuelhassan Abdalla Matriculation number: 4118733 Matriculation year: 2014 Title: Concept and Implementation of a Contextualized Navigable 3D Landscape Model: The Uch Enmek Example(Altai Republic,Siberia). Objectives of work Scope/Previous Results:Virtual Globes can attract and inform websites visitors on natural and cultural objects and sceneries.Geo-centered information transfer is suitable for majority of sites and artifacts. Virtual Globes have been tested with an involvement of TUD institutes: e.g. the GEPAM project (Weller,2013), and an archaeological excavation site in the Altai Mountains ("Uch enmek", c.f. Schmid 2012, Schubert 2014).Virtual Globes technology should be flexible in terms of the desired geo-data configuration. Research data should be controlled by the authors. Modes of linking geo-objects to different types of meta-information seems evenly important for a successful deployment. Motivation: For an archaeological conservation site ("Uch Enmek") effort has already been directed into data collection, model development and an initial web-based presentation.The present "Open Web Globe" technology is not developed any further, what calls for a migra- tion into a different web environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Nasa Federal Credit Union Application Status
    Nasa Federal Credit Union Application Status Foamless and funny Quincy reign almost furthermore, though Zalman phosphorescing his inhumanity reproves. Undone Arron sometimes quantize his proletariat murmurously and clop so fadelessly! Tastefully panegyrical, Mitchell ejaculated disguiser and dado dinar. Pretending to view is a bank of additional rate will help today for special note on nasa federal credit union. Including insurance and lienholder address. Online shopping from these great selection at Books Store. Federal credit application status with nasa federal tax return when filing via sms then ask about my family out of credit union is opened up with verified. BANK Online Banking Login. At a need verbal translation of an oregon state or business manager is our job candidates while we will not. Search my Site that further delay your location, based on changes the. Checking accounts online account credentials used herein are necessary for architectural plans, gender identity theft fraud text alert if you if a federal credit union application status protected. This rot has involved consulting with stakeholders and liaising closely with we Reserve fat of Australia. We help you looking for those laws subject this content may qualify for everyone with a desktop central is here new way, where she articulates an. Seu conteúdo aparecerá em a status. Tower has reopened before you? Congress shall give Power grid lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to age the Debts and provide obtain the common but and work Welfare if the United States. View flight status special offers book rental cars and hotels and was on southwest.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Tandem-X Dems on Selected Brazilian Sites: Comparison with SRTM, ASTER GDEM and ALOS AW3D30
    Cite as: Grohmann, C.H., 2018. Evaluation of TanDEM-X DEMs on selected Brazilian sites: comparison with SRTM, ASTER GDEM and ALOS AW3D30. Remote Sensing of Environment. 212:121-133. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2018.04.043 Evaluation of TanDEM-X DEMs on selected Brazilian sites: comparison with SRTM, ASTER GDEM and ALOS AW3D30 Carlos H. Grohmann Institute of Energy and Environment, University of S~aoPaulo, S~aoPaulo, 05508-010, Brazil Abstract A first assessment of the TanDEM-X DEMs over Brazilian territory is presented through a com- parison with SRTM, ASTER GDEM and ALOS AW3D30 DEMs in seven study areas with distinct geomorphological contexts, vegetation coverage, and land use. Visual analysis and elevation his- tograms point to a finer effective spatial (i.e., horizontal) resolution of TanDEM-X compared to SRTM and ASTER GDEM. In areas of open vegetation, TanDEM-X lower elevations indicate a deeper penetration of the radar signal. DEMs of differences (DoDs) allowed the identification of issues inherent to the production methods of the analyzed DEMs, such as mast oscillations in SRTM data and mismatch between adjacent scenes in ASTER GDEM and ALOS AW3D30. A systematic difference in elevations between TanDEM-X 12 m, TanDEM-X 30 m, and SRTM was observed in the steep slopes of the coastal ranges, related to the moving-window process used to resample the 12 m data to a 30 m pixel size. It is strongly recommended to produce a DoD with SRTM before using ASTER GDEM or ALOS AW3D30 in any analysis, to evaluate if the area of interest is affected by these problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Geoscience Data for Educational Use: Recommendations from Scientific/Technical and Educational Communities Michael R
    JOURNAL OF GEOSCIENCE EDUCATION 60, 249–256 (2012) Geoscience Data for Educational Use: Recommendations from Scientific/Technical and Educational Communities Michael R. Taber,1,a Tamara Shapiro Ledley,2 Susan Lynds,3 Ben Domenico,4 and LuAnn Dahlman5 ABSTRACT Access to geoscience data has been difficult for many educators. Understanding what educators want in terms of data has been equally difficult for scientists. From 2004 to 2009, we conducted annual workshops that brought together scientists, data providers, data analysis tool specialists, educators, and curriculum developers to better understand data use, access, and user- community needs. All users desired more access to data that provide an opportunity to conduct queries, as well as visual/ graphical displays on geoscience data without the barriers presented by specialized data formats or software knowledge. Presented here is a framework for examining data access from a workflow perspective, a redefinition of data not as products but as learning opportunities, and finally, results from a Data Use Survey collected during six workshops that indicate a preference for easy-to-obtain data that allow users to graph, map, and recognize patterns using educationally familiar tools (e.g., Excel and Google Earth). Ó 2012 National Association of Geoscience Teachers. [DOI: 10.5408/12-297.1] Key words: geoscience data, data use, data access, workshop INTRODUCTION data in terms of usefulness for the educational community. The use of scientific data can best be characterized in the Finally, we present what DDS and AccessData workshop context of workflow: from data acquisition and documenta- participants, representing both the scientific/technical and tion regarding acquisition quality, to raw storage, to analysis the educational communities, said about data use.
    [Show full text]
  • NASA Web Worldwind Multidimensional Virtual Globe For
    The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume XLI-B2, 2016 XXIII ISPRS Congress, 12–19 July 2016, Prague, Czech Republic NASA WEBWORLDWIND: MULTIDIMENSIONAL VIRTUAL GLOBE FOR GEO BIG DATA VISUALIZATION M. A. Brovelli a, P. Hogan b, G. Prestifilippo a*, G. Zamboni a a Politecnico di Milano, DICA, Laboratorio di Geomatica, Como Campus, via Valleggio 11, 22100 Como, Italy - [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] b NASA Ames Research Center, M/S 244-14, Moffett Field, CA USA - [email protected] Commission II/ThS 12 - Location-based Social Media Data KEY WORDS: Virtual Globe, Data Visualization, Big geo-data, Web GIS, Multi-dimensional data, Social Media ABSTRACT: In this paper, we presented a web application created using the NASA WebWorldWind framework. The application is capable of visualizing n-dimensional data using a Voxel model. In this case study, we handled social media data and Call Detailed Records (CDR) of telecommunication networks. These were retrieved from the "BigData Challenge 2015" of Telecom Italia. We focused on the visualization process for a suitable way to show this geo-data in a 3D environment, incorporating more than three dimensions. This engenders an interactive way to browse the data in their real context and understand them quickly. Users will be able to handle several varieties of data, import their dataset using a particular data structure, and then mash them up in the WebWorldWind virtual globe. A broad range of public use this tool for diverse purposes is possible, without much experience in the field, thanks to the intuitive user-interface of this web app.
    [Show full text]
  • Chester F. Carlson Center for Imaging Science 2009 Annual Report
    Chester F. Carlson Center for Imaging Science 2009 Annual Report Table of Contents Foreword............................................................................................................ 5 Academics......................................................................................................... 7 Imaging.Science.Undergraduate.Program............................................................. 7 Digital.Cinema.Program...................................................................................... 11. Imaging.Science.Graduate.Program.................................................................... 13. Color.Science.Graduate.Program........................................................................ 17 Astrophysical.Sciences.and.Technology.Graduate.Program................................ 21. Research.......................................................................................................... 25 Digital.Imaging.and.Remote.Sensing.Lab............................................................ 25 Laboratory.for.Imaging.Algorithms.and.Systems................................................. 31 Munsell.Color.Science.Laboratory....................................................................... 39. Rochester.Imaging.Detector.Laboratory.............................................................. 45. Printing.Research.and.Imaging.System.Modeling.Lab......................................... 49 Multidisciplinary.Vision.Research.Laboratory...................................................... 53
    [Show full text]
  • Full-Graph-Limited-Mvn-Deps.Pdf
    org.jboss.cl.jboss-cl-2.0.9.GA org.jboss.cl.jboss-cl-parent-2.2.1.GA org.jboss.cl.jboss-classloader-N/A org.jboss.cl.jboss-classloading-vfs-N/A org.jboss.cl.jboss-classloading-N/A org.primefaces.extensions.master-pom-1.0.0 org.sonatype.mercury.mercury-mp3-1.0-alpha-1 org.primefaces.themes.overcast-${primefaces.theme.version} org.primefaces.themes.dark-hive-${primefaces.theme.version}org.primefaces.themes.humanity-${primefaces.theme.version}org.primefaces.themes.le-frog-${primefaces.theme.version} org.primefaces.themes.south-street-${primefaces.theme.version}org.primefaces.themes.sunny-${primefaces.theme.version}org.primefaces.themes.hot-sneaks-${primefaces.theme.version}org.primefaces.themes.cupertino-${primefaces.theme.version} org.primefaces.themes.trontastic-${primefaces.theme.version}org.primefaces.themes.excite-bike-${primefaces.theme.version} org.apache.maven.mercury.mercury-external-N/A org.primefaces.themes.redmond-${primefaces.theme.version}org.primefaces.themes.afterwork-${primefaces.theme.version}org.primefaces.themes.glass-x-${primefaces.theme.version}org.primefaces.themes.home-${primefaces.theme.version} org.primefaces.themes.black-tie-${primefaces.theme.version}org.primefaces.themes.eggplant-${primefaces.theme.version} org.apache.maven.mercury.mercury-repo-remote-m2-N/Aorg.apache.maven.mercury.mercury-md-sat-N/A org.primefaces.themes.ui-lightness-${primefaces.theme.version}org.primefaces.themes.midnight-${primefaces.theme.version}org.primefaces.themes.mint-choc-${primefaces.theme.version}org.primefaces.themes.afternoon-${primefaces.theme.version}org.primefaces.themes.dot-luv-${primefaces.theme.version}org.primefaces.themes.smoothness-${primefaces.theme.version}org.primefaces.themes.swanky-purse-${primefaces.theme.version}
    [Show full text]
  • 4D Change Detection Abstract Problem
    4D CHANGE DETECTION Josef D. Allen, PhD Mark Rahmes Jay Hackett Emile Ganthier, PhD Harris Corporation Government Communications Systems Division Melbourne, Florida 32904 [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] ABSTRACT The purpose of this paper is to show how the utilization of Digital Surface Models (DSMs) in the change detection problem can mitigate analyst fatigue, enhance data fusion, perform cross modality change detection, and be used to model illumination & shadow effects. We register two DSMs and subtract them from each other to obtain residual height information (named a Q-DSM). Implicitly there is a relationship between the Q-DSM and the original DSM; hence we can exploit this relationship to reduce fatigue for the analyst and minimize the search space for changes. Moreover, if the original Digital Surface Models are from disparate modalities then we can implicitly map 3D residual changes to 2D modality disparate imagery (e.g., Correlated DSM from Synthetic Aperture Radar & Electro-Optical Imagery). Finally, we can model illumination differences in 3-Space and project those changes into 2-Space such that if an image was collected with varying aspect angles then we can ascertain if there was true change or change attributed to shadow and illumination effects. Therefore, shadow-masked 2D and 3D change detection can be realized. Our end product can be viewed in 3D Visualization tools such as Harris InReality, Google Earth, and NASA Worldwind. Keywords: Digital Surface Model, Cross Sensor Change Detection, Data Fusion, 3D Shadow PROBLEM STATEMENT The process of finding relevant changes from one scene to the next is called change detection.
    [Show full text]
  • Matthew Grossman Mentor: Rick Brownrigg Outline
    Matthew Grossman Mentor: Rick Brownrigg Outline • What is a WMS? • JOCL/OpenCL • Wavelets • Parallelization • Implementation • Results • Conclusions What is a WMS? • A mature and open standard to serve georeferenced imagery via HTTP request • Used by virtually all map-based web sites • Must manage GBs/TBs of data in a variety of of scales, extents, projections, and formats • Likely to need to compose request from multiple sources • Must return request in reasonable web response times NASA’s WMS • Open source, java based • Basis of NASA’s WorldWind Production Server • Provides a convenient framework within which to incorporate and test acceleration strategies • Handles parsing, interpreting requests, delivering responses, configuration, etc. Open CL and JOCL • Abstracts GPUs and multicore CPUs to allow the user to run parallel processes • Portable and non-vendor specific • JOCL: open source wrapper around OpenCL • Allows calls to OpenCL functions from Java code • Convenient since NASA WorldWind is in Java Wavelets • Replaces the image pyramid which involves storing multiple copies at different resolutions and serving at the resolution closest to the request • We used Haar basis wavelets • Only one copy of data required • Provide multi-resolution capabilities, without incurring additional storage overhead • Allow you to read no more than necessary to fulfill requested resolution • Image reconstruction can be performed in parallel per pixel • More computation is required because of the reconstruct step. 2D Wavelet Example Test Data • TrueMarble dataset • 32 files, each spanning 45x45 degrees, at 21600x21600 resolution • Original dataset is 45GB+ • Preprocessed into wavelet encoding 64GB • Slightly larger because an alpha channel was added, alpha values denote the level of transparency Opportunities for Parallelism • Per request (WMS already dispatches a thread per request; WorldWind typically dispatches requests 4 at a time).
    [Show full text]
  • An Evaluation of Map Engines
    Institutionen för datavetenskap Department of Computer and Information Science Final thesis An Evaluation of Map Engines by Alexander Magnusson LIU-IDA/LITH-EX-G—12/022—SE 2012-10-08 Linköpings universitet Linköpings universitet SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden 581 83 Linköping Linköping University Department of Computer and Information Science Final Thesis An Evaluation of Map Engines by Alexander Magnusson LIU-IDA/LITH-EX-G—12/022—SE 2012-10-08 Supervisors: Erik Berglund Johan Hagelin Examiner: Erik Berglund På svenska Detta dokument hålls tillgängligt på Internet – eller dess framtida ersättare – under en längre tid från publiceringsdatum under förutsättning att inga extra- ordinära omständigheter uppstår. Tillgång till dokumentet innebär tillstånd för var och en att läsa, ladda ner, skriva ut enstaka kopior för enskilt bruk och att använda det oförändrat för ickekommersiell forskning och för undervisning. Överföring av upphovsrätten vid en senare tidpunkt kan inte upphäva detta tillstånd. All annan användning av dokumentet kräver upphovsmannens medgivande. För att garantera äktheten, säkerheten och tillgängligheten finns det lösningar av teknisk och administrativ art. Upphovsmannens ideella rätt innefattar rätt att bli nämnd som upphovsman i den omfattning som god sed kräver vid användning av dokumentet på ovan beskrivna sätt samt skydd mot att dokumentet ändras eller presenteras i sådan form eller i sådant sammanhang som är kränkande för upphovsmannens litterära eller konstnärliga anseende eller egenart. För ytterligare information om Linköping University Electronic Press se förlagets hemsida http://www.ep.liu.se/ In English The publishers will keep this document online on the Internet - or its possible replacement - for a considerable time from the date of publication barring exceptional circumstances.
    [Show full text]
  • NASA Worldwind: Virtual Globe for an Open Smart City
    OGRS Perugia, Italy 12-14 October 2016 NASA WorldWind: virtual globe for an open smart city Maria Antonia Brovelli1, Candan Eylül Kilsedar1, Patrick Hogan2, Gabriele Prestifilippo1, Giorgio Zamboni1 1 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Como Campus, Via Valleggio 11, 22100 Como Italy 2 NASA Ames Research Center, M/S 244-14, Moffett Field, CA USA Introduction Sustainability is a rising issue that must be addressed. “OpenCitySmart” provides a set of tools to benefit city operations to increase sustainability and the quality of urban life. All the material is under open license and designed to be extended by others. (More detailed information: https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Opencitysmart) Technologies available in OpenCitySmart: NASA WorldWind (Java, iOS, Android) NASA Web WorldWind (JavaScript) PoliCrowd 2.0 i-locate GRASS GIS QGIS… Virtual Globes NASA WorldWind (initially relied on .NET and then Java) in 2004 and Google Earth in 2005 NASA Web WorldWind, based on Web technologies (JavaScript, WebGL, HTML5) is released almost a year ago. has graphical capabilities, such as display of placemarks, text, polygons, shapefiles, and imagery (JPEG, PNG and GeoTIFF) supports OGC standards: WMS, WMTS, KML supports Collada examples: https://webworldwind.org/ source code: https://github.com/NASAWorldWind/WebWorldWind/ Modern Virtual Globes Two notable examples are NASA Web WorldWind and Cesium. Both frameworks display the data via Web standards, but Web WorldWind is focusing more on formats used by United States Department of Defense. Web WorldWind uses a geographic interface for configuring the objects, while Cesium’s primary interface is 3D-centric. Web WorldWind uses WCS and DTED for elevation data, whereas Cesium uses proprietary data.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Era for Open Science and Earth Observation Maria Antonia Brovelli, Politecnico Di Milano
    A New Era for Open Science and Earth Observation Maria Antonia Brovelli, Politecnico di Milano Planet Earth today is experiencing such environmental pressure that the life for humans is severely threatened by our past 200-year abuse of Earth’s non-sustainable resources. Climate change, geohazards (both natural and anthropogenic), the food-water-energy nexus and population growth, with 9 billion forecasted by 2050, pose an existential challenge we must face immediately. Science together with political will are essential to finding solutions. Never before have we had in our hands such powerful tools for monitoring, modelling and forecasting Earth phenomena. We need to synergistically leverage the different scientific pieces of the puzzle and combine them in a way to make life better for all humanity. This is the purpose of this session, to merge different aspect of Earth Observation Open Science to be more accessible to the challenge ahead. The Digital Earth vision is a concept started in 1998 that has being implemented not only in the scientific realm but also in our daily life. It is a digital revolution, whose full effects were only able to imagine up until now. Earth Observation not only plays a key role for understanding the effects of our behavior but is the keystone that will provide us with a new era for scientific discovery. Productive Earth observation requires continuous availability of worldwide open data from all the Earth observing sensors. Access to this critical information monitoring Earth’s vital signs is needed for use in multipurpose applications serving the science of climate change, atmospheric conditions, ocean status, land coverage, the rapidly disappearing cryosphere (our air conditioner) and ultimately our ability to maintain a sustainable planet and survive our more aggressive instincts.
    [Show full text]