Download (1MB)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Middlesex University Research Repository An open access repository of Middlesex University research http://eprints.mdx.ac.uk Zhou, Bin, Bentham, James, Di Cesare, Mariachiara ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3934-3364, Danaei, Goodarz, Hajifathalian, Kaveh, Taddei, Cristina, Carrillo-Larco, Rodrigo M., Djalalinia, Shirin, Khatibzadeh, Shahab, Lugero, Charles, Peykari, Niloofar, Zhang, Wan Zhu, Bilano, Ver, Stevens, Gretchen A., Cowan, Melanie J., Riley, Leanne M., Zhengming, Chen, Hambleton, Ian, Jackson, Rod T., Kengne, Andre Pascal, Khang, Young-Ho, Laxmaiah, Avula, Liu, Jing, Malekzadeh, Reza, Neuhauser, Hannelore K., Soric, Maroje, Starc, Gregor, Sundstrom, Johan, Woodward, Mark, Ezzati, Majid and NCD Risk Factor Collaboration, (NCD-RisC) (2018) Contributions of mean and shape of blood pressure distribution to worldwide trends and variations in raised blood pressure: a pooled analysis of 1018 population-based measurement studies with 88.6 million participants. International Journal of Epidemiology, 47 (3) . 872-883i. ISSN 0300-5771 [Article] (doi:10.1093/ije/dyy016) Published version (with publisher’s formatting) This version is available at: https://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/23488/ Copyright: Middlesex University Research Repository makes the University’s research available electronically. Copyright and moral rights to this work are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners unless otherwise stated. The work is supplied on the understanding that any use for commercial gain is strictly forbidden. A copy may be downloaded for personal, non-commercial, research or study without prior permission and without charge. Works, including theses and research projects, may not be reproduced in any format or medium, or extensive quotations taken from them, or their content changed in any way, without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). They may not be sold or exploited commercially in any format or medium without the prior written permission of the copyright holder(s). Full bibliographic details must be given when referring to, or quoting from full items including the author’s name, the title of the work, publication details where relevant (place, publisher, date), pag- ination, and for theses or dissertations the awarding institution, the degree type awarded, and the date of the award. If you believe that any material held in the repository infringes copyright law, please contact the Repository Team at Middlesex University via the following email address: [email protected] The item will be removed from the repository while any claim is being investigated. See also repository copyright: re-use policy: http://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/policies.html#copy 2 International Journal of Epidemiology, 2018, 1–21 doi: 10.1093/ije/dyy016 Original article Original article Contributions of mean and shape of blood pressure distribution to worldwide trends and variations in raised blood pressure: a pooled analysis of 1018 population-based measurement studies with 88.6 million participants NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC) Members are listed at the end of the paper. Corresponding author. Prof. Majid Ezzati, Imperial College London, London W2 1PG, UK. E-mail: [email protected] Editorial decision 16 January 2018; Accepted 24 January 2018 Abstract Background: Change in the prevalence of raised blood pressure could be due to both shifts in the entire distribution of blood pressure (representing the combined effects of public health interventions and secular trends) and changes in its high-blood-pressure tail (representing successful clinical interventions to control blood pressure in the hyper- tensive population). Our aim was to quantify the contributions of these two phenomena to the worldwide trends in the prevalence of raised blood pressure. Methods: We pooled 1018 population-based studies with blood pressure measurements on 88.6 million participants from 1985 to 2016. We first calculated mean systolic blood pressure (SBP), mean diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and prevalence of raised blood pressure by sex and 10-year age group from 20–29 years to 70–79 years in each study, taking into account complex survey design and survey sample weights, where rele- vant. We used a linear mixed effect model to quantify the association between (probit- transformed) prevalence of raised blood pressure and age-group- and sex-specific mean blood pressure. We calculated the contributions of change in mean SBP and DBP, and of change in the prevalence-mean association, to the change in prevalence of raised blood pressure. Results: In 2005–16, at the same level of population mean SBP and DBP, men and women in South Asia and in Central Asia, the Middle East and North Africa would have the highest prevalence of raised blood pressure, and men and women in the high- income Asia Pacific and high-income Western regions would have the lowest. In most region-sex-age groups where the prevalence of raised blood pressure declined, one half or more of the decline was due to the decline in mean blood pressure. Where prevalence of raised blood pressure has increased, the change was entirely driven by increasing mean blood pressure, offset partly by the change in the prevalence-mean association. VC The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Epidemiological Association. 1 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/ije/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/ije/dyy016/4944405 by Middlesex university user on 10 May 2018 2 International Journal of Epidemiology, 2018, Vol. 0, No. 0 Conclusions: Change in mean blood pressure is the main driver of the worldwide change in the prevalence of raised blood pressure, but change in the high-blood-pressure tail of the distribution has also contributed to the change in prevalence, especially in older age groups. Key words: Blood pressure, hypertension, population health, global health, non-communicable disease Key Messages • After accounting for the difference in mean blood pressure, there is still a 3–5 percentage-point difference in the prevalence of raised blood pressure across regions, being highest in South Asia and in Central Asia, the Middle East and North Africa, and lowest in the high-income Asia Pacific and high-income Western regions. • Shifts in entire distribution of blood pressure have been the main driver of the change in prevalence of raised blood pressure. • There is also a measurable contribution from the change in the high-blood-pressure tail of the distribution, towards lowering the prevalence of raised blood pressure, especially in older people. Introduction change its mean as well as the prevalence of raised blood Raised blood pressure, commonly defined as systolic blood pressure. In contrast, the use of antihypertensive medicines pressure (SBP) 140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure and lifestyle change to reduce blood pressure in those with (DBP) 90 mmHg, is used to identify individuals at high elevated levels would reduce the prevalence of raised blood risk of cardiovascular diseases.1–5 Globally, one in four pressure by acting on the high-blood-pressure tail of the men and one in five women, totalling 1.13 billion adults, distribution, and hence change the shape of the distribu- had raised blood pressure in 2015.6 One of the global non- tion with a relatively small impact on its mean. An import- communicable disease (NCD) targets adopted by the ant question that can inform strategies for meeting the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2013 is to reduce global target and reducing the burden of raised blood pres- the prevalence of raised blood pressure by 25% compared sure, is to what extent regional differences and changes with its 2010 level, by 2025.7 over time in the prevalence of raised blood pressure are The prevalence of raised blood pressure varies substan- driven by variations in the mean SBP and DBP versus by tially across and within regions and countries, with age- the shape of the distribution. We used a database of standardized adult prevalence in 2015 ranging from 20% population-based studies with global coverage conducted in the high-income Asia Pacific region to 33% in Central over three decades to investigate contributions of popula- and Eastern Europe for men, and from 11% in the high- tion mean and high-blood-pressure individuals to world- income Asia Pacific region to 28% in sub-Saharan Africa wide trends and variations in raised blood pressure. for women.6 Prevalence has declined substantially in high- income regions for decades, and is also declining in some middle-income regions; it has been stable or has increased Methods in other low- and middle-income regions.6 Blood pressure is a complex trait, affected by genes, Study design fetal and early childhood nutrition and growth,8 adiposity We first used population-based data to estimate the associ- and weight gain,9,10 diet (especially sodium and potassium ation between the prevalence of raised blood pressure, intakes),9,11,12 alcohol use,10,13 smoking,14 physical activ- defined as SBP 140 mmHg or DBP 90 mmHg, and ity,10,15 air pollution,16 lead,17 noise,18 psychosocial population mean SBP and DBP among men and women stress,19 sleep duration20 and the use of blood pressure- aged 20 to 79 years in nine regions of the world, from lowering medicines. Changes in some of these factors, for 1985 to 2016. We used a linear mixed effect model to example increase in body mass index (BMI) and better quantify the association between the prevalence of raised nutrition in childhood and adolescence, can shift the entire blood pressure and mean blood pressure. Our statistical population distribution of blood pressure, and hence model, described below, allowed the prevalence of raised Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/ije/advance-article-abstract/doi/10.1093/ije/dyy016/4944405 by Middlesex university user on 10 May 2018 International Journal of Epidemiology, 2018, Vol.