DOCSLIB.ORG

Technical Memorandum: Queens Revision 14-4M

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Technical Memorandum: Queens Revision 14-4M MTA Long Island Rail Road East Side Access Design Changes in Queens Revision 14-4M Environmental Analysis November 2005 United States Department of Transportation Federal Transit Administration Metropolitan Transportation Authority State of New York Table of Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................1 A. Introduction .......................................................................................................................2 B. History of Design Changes................................................................................................3 Feis Design in Queens ...........................................................................................................3 Design Modification Since the FEIS .....................................................................................5 Modifications to Midday Storage Yard Access.................................................................5 Harold Interlocking Improvements....................................................................................7 Additional Tracks Between 43rd and 48th Streets ............................................................7 New Sunnyside Emergency Ventilation Buildings and Substations .................................8 New 43rd Street Substation ...............................................................................................8 Yard Access Drives ...........................................................................................................9 C. Assessment of Project Effects ...........................................................................................9 Land Use and Social Conditions............................................................................................9 Affected Environment .......................................................................................................9 Property Acquisitions ......................................................................................................11 Potential Impacts from Completed Project......................................................................14 Economic Conditions...........................................................................................................16 Affected Environment .....................................................................................................16 Acquisition, Relocation, and Compensation....................................................................16 Potential Impacts During Construction ...........................................................................17 Potential Impacts from Completed Project......................................................................18 Visual and Aesthetic Considerations ...................................................................................18 Affected Environment .....................................................................................................18 Potential Impacts During Construction ...........................................................................20 Potential Impacts from Completed Project......................................................................20 Historic Resources ...............................................................................................................22 Affected Environment .....................................................................................................22 Potential Impacts During Construction ...........................................................................23 Potential Impacts from Completed Project......................................................................25 AKRF, Inc. TOC-1 November 2005 Archaeological Resources....................................................................................................26 Affected Environment .....................................................................................................26 Potential Impacts During Construction ...........................................................................31 Potential Impacts from Completed Project......................................................................31 Transportation......................................................................................................................31 Affected Environment .....................................................................................................31 Potential Impacts During Construction ...........................................................................32 Potential Impacts from Completed Project......................................................................33 Air Quality ...........................................................................................................................34 Affected Environment .....................................................................................................34 Potential Impacts During Construction ...........................................................................34 Potential Impacts from Completed Project......................................................................34 Noise and Vibration .............................................................................................................35 Affected Environment .....................................................................................................35 Potential Impacts During Construction ...........................................................................35 Potential Impacts from Completed Project......................................................................37 Energy..................................................................................................................................40 Utilities and Subsurface Infrastructure ................................................................................40 Contaminated Materials .......................................................................................................41 Affected Environment .....................................................................................................41 Potential Impacts During Construction ...........................................................................41 Potential Impacts From Completed Project.....................................................................42 Natural Resources ................................................................................................................43 Affected Environment .....................................................................................................43 Potential Impacts During Construction ...........................................................................43 Potential Impacts from Completed Project......................................................................43 Safety and Security ..............................................................................................................44 Environmental Justice..........................................................................................................44 Process and Public Participation..........................................................................................45 East Side Access Project..................................................................................................45 Revision 14-4M Design Changes in Queens ...................................................................46 D. Conclusions .....................................................................................................................47 Appendix A: Addenda to the East Side Access Project Stage 1A Archaeological Assessment Appendix B: Project Correspondence from the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) and the New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission (LPC) AKRF, Inc. TOC-2 November 2005 List of Tables Table 1 Sunnyside Area Project Elements: Comparison of Revision 14-4M to Earlier Designs...2 Table 2 Areas of Archaeological Sensitivity and Potential Project Effects..................................27 Table 2 (Cont’d) Areas of Archaeological Sensitivity and Potential Project Effects...................28 Table 3 Construction Noise Limits for East Side Access Project.................................................36 Table 4 Vibration and Ground-Borne Noise Impact Criteria .......................................................39 Table 5 Vibration and Ground-Borne Noise Impact Evaluation ..................................................40 Table 6 Stakeholder Meetings and Correspondence for Revision 14-4M Design Changes in Queens ...................................................................46 AKRF, Inc. TOC-3 November 2005 List of Figures Following Page Figure 1 East Side Access Project Elements in Queens and Manhattan ......................................4 Figure 2 Aerial View of the Sunnyside Area ...............................................................................4 Figure 3 East Side Access Project Elements in Sunnyside Rail Complex, Revision 14-4M .......6 Figure 4 Existing Conditions and Conceptual Rendering of 39th Street Emergency Exit/ Ventilation Facility as Seen from Skillman Avenue......................................................8 Figure 5 Existing Conditions and Conceptual Rendering of 39th Street Emergency Exit/ Ventilation Facility as Seen from 39th Street Bridge....................................................8
Load more

Recommended publications
  • MTA Construction & Development, the Group Within the Agency Responsible for All Capital Construction Work
    NYS Senate East Side Access/East River Tunnels Oversight Hearing May 7, 2021 Opening / Acknowledgements Good morning. My name is Janno Lieber, and I am the President of MTA Construction & Development, the group within the agency responsible for all capital construction work. I want to thank Chair Comrie and Chair Kennedy for the invitation to speak with you all about some of our key MTA infrastructure projects, especially those where we overlap with Amtrak. Mass transit is the lifeblood of New York, and we need a strong system to power our recovery from this unprecedented crisis. Under the leadership of Governor Cuomo, New York has demonstrated national leadership by investing in transformational mega-projects like Moynihan Station, Second Avenue Subway, East Side Access, Third Track, and most recently, Metro-North Penn Station Access, which we want to begin building this year. But there is much more to be done, and more investment is needed. We have a once-in-a-generation infrastructure opportunity with the new administration in Washington – and we thank President Biden, Secretary Buttigieg and Senate Majority Leader, Chuck Schumer, for their support. It’s a new day to advance transit projects that will turbo-charge the post-COVID economy and address overdue challenges of social equity and climate change. East Side Access Today we are on the cusp of a transformational upgrade to our commuter railroads due to several key projects. Top of the list is East Side Access. I’m pleased to report that it is on target for completion by the end of 2022 as planned.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bulletin BROOKLYN PCC CARS’ 80 ANNIVERSARY
    ERA BULLETIN — DECEMBER, 2016 The Bulletin Electric Railroaders’ Association, Incorporated Vol. 59, No. 12 December, 2016 TH The Bulletin BROOKLYN PCC CARS’ 80 ANNIVERSARY Published by the Electric by Bernard Linder Railroaders’ Association, Incorporated, PO Box (Continued from November, 2016 issue) 3323, New York, New York 10163-3323. As soon as the cars were in service, news- dynamic brake came into service first and papers reported that the passengers liked was increased as the brake foot pedal was For general inquiries, or the quiet, fast, comfortable cars. St. Louis depressed. At 3-inch pedal movement, the Bulletin submissions, Car Company’s booklet explains how the track brake cut in. The air brake completed contact us at bulletin@ company accomplished this feat. the braking cycle and held the car after it erausa.org. ERA’s The designers proceeded to develop a radi- stopped. Your Editor-in-Chief’s supervisor website is cally new control and braking apparatus for recalled that the Brooklyn cars’ magnetic www.erausa.org. smooth and rapid starts and stops. To deter- brakes were disconnected after they wore Editorial Staff: mine the maximum comfortable acceleration, out the track rails at the trolley stops. The Editor-in-Chief: your Editor-in-Chief’s supervisor sat in a car PCC’s brakes gave rates of retardation that Bernard Linder loaded with sandbags. Tests were conducted were not previously achieved. Tri-State News and in the Ninth Avenue Depot at different rates The PCCs were much quieter than the old- Commuter Rail Editor: Ronald Yee of acceleration and deceleration. These ex- er cars.
    [Show full text]
  • MTA Metro-North Railroad Penn Station Access Project
    Penn Station Access Project: Environmental Assessment and Section 4(f) Evaluation 1. Background and Purpose and Need 1.1 INTRODUCTION The Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) is proposing the Penn Station Access (PSA) Project, which would provide one-seat passenger rail service to Penn Station New York (PSNY) on Manhattan’s west side for Metro North Railroad’s (Metro-North) New Haven Line (NHL) customers (Proposed Project). MTA Construction and Development (MTACD)—the successor to MTA Capital Construction—would plan, design, and construct the Proposed Project and related public outreach, and Metro-North would operate and maintain the service. The Proposed Project would provide new rail service from New Haven, Connecticut (CT) to PSNY in Manhattan by following Amtrak’s Hell Gate Line (HGL) on the Northeast Corridor (NEC) through the eastern Bronx and western Queens. The Proposed Project would make infrastructure improvements on the HGL beginning in southeastern Westchester County—where NHL trains would divert onto the HGL at Shell Interlocking1—and extending to Harold Interlocking in Queens, joining MTA Long Island Rail Road (LIRR) Main line. As part of the Proposed Project, four new Metro-North stations would be constructed in the eastern Bronx at Hunts Point, Parkchester-Van Nest, Morris Park, and Co-op City. Figure 1-1 depicts the Proposed Project’s construction area and service area, and shows the relationship between the HGL, Metro-North, and LIRR systems. The proposed Metro-North service to PSNY would begin operations after the LIRR East Side Access (ESA) project service to Grand Central Terminal (GCT) is initiated. The Amended Full Funding Grant Agreement (August 2016) between MTA and Federal Transit Administration (FTA) projects ESA service to begin December 2023.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Design and Visual Resources
    18.0 Urban Design and Visual Resources A. INTRODUCTION This chapter evaluates the effects of the Proposed Action on the urban form and visual resources of the Project Site and surrounding Study Area. Provided in this chapter is a description and analysis of the existing urban design and visual resources of the Project Site and Study Area, and descriptions of Future conditions with and without the Proposed Action in 2009. No significant adverse impacts to urban design or visual resources would result from the Proposed Action; the variations, all of which would be constructed according to the same site plan and building envelope as the Preferred Development Program, would likewise result in no significant adverse impacts to urban design or visual resources. The Proposed Action would result in development that differs substantially in height, bulk, form, scale, and arrangement compared to the uses currently found on the Project Site. These changes are identified in the CEQR Technical Manual as conditions suggesting that analyses of urban design and visual resources are appropriate. Based on guidance in the CEQR Technical Manual, the urban design analysis considers the potential impact of the Proposed Action related to building bulk, use, type, and arrangement, block form, street pattern and hierarchy, streetscape elements, and natural features. Also, based on guidance provided in the CEQR Technical Manual, the visual resources analysis considers the potential impact of the Proposed Action on important views of visual resources, such as the East River waterfront and the historic Queensboro Bridge and New York Architectural Terra Cotta Company building, from publicly accessible locations.
    [Show full text]
  • 2000 LIRR Report Card Results of the Annual, Independent Rider Survey from the Long Island Rail Road Commuters' Council
    The 2000 LIRR Report Card Results of the Annual, Independent Rider Survey from the Long Island Rail Road Commuters' Council Michael T. Doyle Associate Director Joshua Schank Transportation Planner October 2000 Long Island Rail Road Commuters' Council 347 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10017 (212) 878-7087 • www.lirrcc.org © 2000 LIRRCC Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank the members of the LIRRCC for their invaluable efforts in performing survey research in the field, and the Long Island Rail Road for its cooperation during survey activities. The authors also gratefully acknowledge technical assistance provided by former PCAC Associate Director Alan Foster. The Long Island Rail Road Commuters' Council (LIRRCC) is the legislatively mandated representative of the ridership of MTA Long Island Rail Road. Our 12 volunteer members are regular users of the LIRR system and are appointed by the Governor upon the recommendation of the Nassau and Suffolk County Executives, and Brooklyn and Queens Borough Presidents. The Council is an affiliate of the Permanent Citizens Advisory Committee to the MTA (PCAC). For more information, please visit our website: www.lirrcc.org. Table of Contents Executive Summary 1 Methodology 3 Results for Performance Indicators 5 Systemwide Results 5 Results by Branch 10 Results for Customer Comments 17 Systemwide Results 17 Results by Branch 20 Representative Customer Comments 25 Service Delivery 25 Service Requirements 25 Scheduling 28 On-Time Performance 31 Operations 32 Maintenance of Service During Severe
    [Show full text]
  • Pooyan Aslani, Ph.D
    Pooyan Aslani, Ph.D. Education: Ph.D. in Civil Engineering, Polytechnic University, 2007 MS in Civil Engineering, Polytechnic University, 2003 BS in Civil Engineering, Tehran Polytechnic, 1999 Summary Building Information Modeling (BIM) Dr. Aslani has been involved with Building Information Modeling since 2001 as a graduate student, and created BIM for Polytechnic Institute of NYU’s campus extension. His extensive knowledge of BIM has been published in several academic journals, and he is currently working on publishing his first book which is a practical guide for the use of BIM in the construction industry. He has been involved with one the most challenging BIM projects in NYC, Atlantic Yards (Frank Gehry’s Design), developing a practical solution to extract information from the 3D model during the pre-construction stage. Dr. Aslani uses his practical and theoretical experiences in BIM when teaching Building Information Modeling Technique in graduate school at Polytechnic Institute of NYU. Project Control and Risk Analysis As a Project Management Oversight Contractor (PMOC) for the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), Dr. Aslani is working on two mega projects: East Side Access (ESA) and Second Avenue Subway (SAS). In this position, he collaborated on the development and implementation of Enterprise Level Project Execution Plan (ELPEP), Schedule Management Pan (SMP), Cost Management Plan (CMP) and Risk Management Plan (RMP) for the FTA’s managing grantee, Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA). Dr. Aslani is currently reporting on the progress of the execution of these plans to the FTA. He has developed and is using a shadow model of the integrated project schedule and cost to illustrate the project's progress for FTA executives.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of the Second Avenue Subway Performing Organization: the City College of New York, CUNY
    front cover page.ai 1 8/20/2014 9:55:30 AM University Transportation Research Center - Region 2 Final Report The Politics of Large Infrastructure Investment Decision-Making: The Case of the Second Avenue Subway Performing Organization: The City College of New York, CUNY November 2013 Sponsor: University Transportation Research Center - Region 2 University Transportation Research Center - Region 2 UTRC-RF Project No: 49111-16-23 The Region 2 University Transportation Research Center (UTRC) is one of ten original University Transportation Centers established in 1987 by the U.S. Congress. These Centers were established Project Date: November 2013 with the recognition that transportation plays a key role in the nation's economy and the quality of life of its citizens. University faculty members provide a critical link in resolving our national and regional transportation problems while training the professionals who address our transpor- Project Title: The Politics of Large Infrastructure Invest- tation systems and their customers on a daily basis. ment Decision-Making: The Case of the Second Avenue Subway The UTRC was established in order to support research, education and the transfer of technology in the ield of transportation. The theme of the Center is "Planning and Managing Regional Project’s Website: Transportation Systems in a Changing World." Presently, under the direction of Dr. Camille Kamga, http://www.utrc2.org/research/projects/transportation- the UTRC represents USDOT Region II, including New York, New Jersey, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Functioning as a consortium of twelve major Universities throughout the region, mega-project-case-ny-2nd-ave-subway UTRC is located at the CUNY Institute for Transportation Systems at The City College of New York, the lead institution of the consortium.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Railroad Administration Record of Decision for the East Side Access Project
    Federal Railroad Administration Record of Decision For the East Side Access Project September 2012 SUMMARY OF DECISION This is a Record of Decision (ROD) of the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), an operating administration of the U.S. Department of Transportation, regarding the East Side Access (ESA) Project. FRA has prepared this ROD in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the Council on Environmental Quality’s (CEQ) regulations implementing NEPA, and FRA’s Procedures for Considering Environmental Impacts. The Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) filed an application with the FRA for a loan to finance eligible elements of the ESA Project through the Railroad Rehabilitation and Improvement Financing (RRIF) Program. The ESA Project is the MTA’s largest system expansion in over 100 years. The ESA Project will expand the Long Island Rail Road (LIRR) services by connecting Queens and Long Island with East Midtown Manhattan. With direct LIRR service to Midtown East, the LIRR will further increase its market share of commuters by saving up to 40 minutes per day in subway/bus/sidewalk travel time for commuters who work on Manhattan’s East Side. The ESA Project was previously considered in an environmental impact statement (EIS) prepared by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) in May 2001 and subsequent FTA reevaluations and an environmental assessment of changes in the ESA Project. Construction of the ESA Project has been ongoing since 2001. FRA has reviewed the environmental impacts for the ESA Project identified in the FTA March 2001 Final EIS, subsequent FTA Reevaluations, and the 2006 Supplemental EA/FONSI (collectively, the “2001 EIS”) for the ESA Project and adopted it pursuant to CEQ regulations (40 CFR 1506.3).
    [Show full text]
  • 2030 Regional Strategic Review
    20302030 RegionalRegional StrategicStrategic ReviewReview Presentation to the Permanent Citizens Advisory Committee June 18, 2007 TopicsTopics MTA’s Regional Strategic Review How is the region changing? Where is the region heading? How are NYC and the Suburban Counties Planning for this Growth? Possible Implications for MTA Network Next steps 1 TheThe RegionalRegional StrategicStrategic ReviewReview The Regional Strategic Review is being carried out to: • quantify the long-range demographic and economic trends in the MTA region • gauge the impact these trends could have on MTA's networks and services and; • begin the process of identifying potential strategies to address these impacts, for inclusion in the next 20 Year Needs Assessment and 2010-2014 Capital Plan A cooperative effort with MTA Capital Program Management 2006 2007 2008 2009 20 Year Needs Assessment Prepare, Draft, Update and Finalize Prepare Early Start (22 months) 2010-2014 Plan Start 20 Year Needs Assessment 2 TheThe RegionalRegional StrategicStrategic ReviewReview Status Regional scan Completed Gauge potential impacts on MTA services Nearing completion Confirm existing plans/identify potential improvements as Mid-2007 part of 20 Year Needs early start Complete 20 Year Needs Assessment Mid-2008 Complete draft of next 5 year Capital Plan 3rd quarter 2009 3 HowHow isis thethe RegionRegion Changing?Changing? • 31 County Metropolitan Area 75 miles • 3 analysis areas: 50 miles NYC 25 miles from Manhattan CBD Inner Ring Outer Ring 4 HowHow isis thethe RegionRegion Changing?Changing? Population has increased • NYC’s population grew from 7.3 million in 1990 to 8.2 million in 2005 • The region’s population grew from 19.8 million in 1990 to 22.2 million in 2005 • Three quarters of this growth is due to immigration 9,000 8,000 8,209.3 7,000 7,127.8 6,907.4 6,000 5,000 4,000 New York City Inner Ring Outer Ring 1970 1980 1990 2000 Est.
    [Show full text]
  • FY 2016 Small Starts Land Use and Economic Development Report
    CityLYNX Gold Line Phase 2 FY 2016 Small Starts Land Use and Economic Development Report September 2014 Phase Two Small Starts Project Map Cemetery St Patt on Av Geraldine W 28th St W 27th St 77 Powe alina Av Frenc Tr ¦¨§ O Dr Cat W h St Fon aklawn Av 26th t S I-77 Hy ana Av W 25th St ! ndrill t St St Mill Rd A f t French Street t S S cro s W 24th S E 26th St n S n b o p b t rin Ba o d r g St u H R B t d r le Av St W 23rd St o Polk St Keswick Av !F s Johnson C. Smith University e i t Ca Sylvania t a a R nto Statesvil N Graham e t 1 St n Pl Plymo B 1 Av Martin St it x S ton uth Av E pratt St 7 Polk S 7 I- Bruns Avenue S Hamil ! a R W Brookshire Fr Dunloe St c 0 St 1 Dalton Av it x t E W Liddell 7 Frazier Av I-7 S N Brevard St E 2 Ashby S 2 ! Wesley Heights Way nd St Johnson St E 21st St a R W 12th b W E 16th St rkwoo 0 10th Pa d 1 A v t St i Irwin Avenue S x th St ! t t E mi S W 7 9th St 7 N Elm St - I Johnson & Wales owell S S W 4th St ! W 5th St W 7th St Ext W E on St 1 6 8 t hurch St ds t N Mcd Greenleaf A h C vi h S N Poplar StN a S t D t E 13th S N Av Charlotte Gateway Station E 11th St E 12th St E 15th ! N I-77 Hy W 1st S v ! t Seigle S t S Cedar St ine St St t P t N e S W 4th St Mint Street lleg E 9th St m ! W Hill St a W Trade St Co ! h N ll St ra e Harrill St Allen St G N Tryon St w S E Cald Belmont Av1 N 5 ! W 3rd St E N Alexander St th Tyron Street 7th St E Van S ! ! 8th St E 10th St t son St W Every St M E Tr E 9th o E S Clark r St 5t e ade St h h S S 277 e Av t § e ¨¦ t a hurch ! W C d S C Otts St Louis ar S E 4th St CTC/Arena
    [Show full text]
  • Download Brochure
    4301LIC.COM 4301LIC.COM The View Looks Good From Here In the heart of Long Island City is 43-01 22nd Street, stop to Manhattan. And, tenants' needs are a six-story building with stunning views and workspaces understood by an ownership team comprised tailored to small and medium-size companies. of two family run organizations, GFP Real Estate and Olmstead Properties. We look forward to Modern interiors paired with new oversized windows meeting you. allow for tons of natural light, making this building a place to thrive. Access is swift, being one subway Building entrance on 22nd Street, facing west. 4301LIC.COM Renovated, expanded lobby and building entrance with a new, modernized elevator. 4301LIC.COM Small workspaces boasting polished concrete floors, new oversized windows, and stunning views. 4301LIC.COM All spaces feature 12’ 6” slab-to-slab ceiling heights and industrial fluted columns. 4301LIC.COM Medium spaces featuring abundant natural light, amazing views, and an overall inspiring work environment. 4301LIC.COM Upper 40t Ave 4301LIC.COM East St 10t 40t Ave Side F F ACCESS St 21t QUEENSBRIDGE PARK N W Queensboro 98 E 59t St Bridge 7 WALK SCORE 10t St 10t Long 5 STOPS Island 100 TO PORT AUTHORITY City TRANSIT SCORE E 1 STOP M TO MANHATTAN E 52t St 7 Midtown East 6 STOPS G TO PENN STATION 11t St 4 MIN Vrnon B WALK TO COURT SQUARE E 48t St G E M 7 G 47t R 7 2 MIN E 45t St gantry plaza state park drive 7 MIN 3 STOPS TO THE LIRR WALK TO GRAND CENTRAL 7 TO QUEENSBORO PLAZA 4 STOPS TO WILLIAMSBURG N W 7 3 MIN Firt Ave 1 STOP DRIVE TO GREENPOINT TO THE EAST 5 CITIBIKE RIVER FERRY EaST STOPS river LESS THAN 5 MINUTES AWAY E 33r St 4301LIC.COM LIC on the move Long Island City offers something special.
    [Show full text]
  • Jackson Avenue Future Home of Your Business 2 Highlights
    PRIME COURT SQUARE RETAIL 2320 JACKSON AVENUE FUTURE HOME OF YOUR BUSINESS 2 HIGHLIGHTS Location • Incredible corner exposure and frontage at the center of LIC’s business district – COURT SQUARE • Corner of Jackson Ave and Pearson St Size • 10,000 sf floor plate (as is) • Can build up to 60,000+ sf Rent Upon request Neighboring Tenants Comments Citibank, Burger Garage, LIC Market, • Directly in front of 1 Court Square – 1,500,000 sf of office space (Citibank) Dutch Kills, Silvercup Studios, CUNY • Over 22,500 new residential units planned for LIC School of Law, Queens Court House, Starbucks, Subway, Astoria Bank • Direct access to the Court Square subway entrance across Jackson Avenue (Coming soon) • Court Square subway with a daily ridership of 27,000 is located steps away • The Jackson Square retail opportunity is 30,000 SQ FT between three levels; outdoor space available • The Court Square is centrally located on the corner of Jackson Avenue, with maximal exposure across from the Citibank building PRIME COURT SQUARE RETAIL 3 RESIDENTIAL MAP DEVELOPMENTS CONSTRUCTION/ QUEENSBORO BRIDGE 22nd St 99 QUEENS PLAZA SOUTH 98 23rd St PLANNING 20 24th St 41st Ave NO. ADDRESS STATUS UNITS 13th St Queens Plaza North 3 12th St Crescent St 56 23-10 Queens Plaza South 2015 391 Silvercup 97 4 Studios 101 30 27th St 59 42-14 Crescent Street 2015 48 100 60 42-60 Crescent Street 2015 40 7 Jetblue Metlife 102 91 61 25-19 43rd Avenue 2015 86 56 M N 28th St 21ST ST 11 65 43-25 Hunter Street 2016 974 Q Queensboro Bridge Greenway 29th St 42nd Rd 103 10 70 Tisman Speyer Phase 1 2017 2000 22nd St 1 Northern Blvd 59 Clock- 71 Tisman Speyer Phase 2 2018 TBD 72 tower To Bridge 88 72 25-10 Queens Plaza South 2017 150 23rd St 85 29 96 Dutch Kills (42-02 27th St) 7 Green 44th Ave 43rd Ave 104 74 Dept.
    [Show full text]