Summit County Health Department Memorandum

SUMMIT COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT

MEMORANDUM

DATE: December 3, 2020 TO: Summit County Council FROM: Rich Bullough

RE: Hospital surge planning related to COVID-19

The purpose of this work session is to inform the Summit County Council and the public about system-wide, coordinated efforts to assure high levels of clinical care during possible surges in COVID-19 cases in Utah.

Dr. Wing Province, Medical Director Park City Hospital, and Kevin McCulley, State of Utah Unified Command COVID-19 ICS and Preparedness and Response Director, will describe surge planning from clinical and preparedness perspectives.

From the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, a primary goal of mitigating disease transmission has been to avoid overwhelming the hospital system, especially ICU resources. This goal has not been limited to physical resources, but has also focused on human resources, especially clinical providers and support staff.

As anticipated, new cases of COVID-19 have surged across the nation, in Utah, and in Summit County as we have approached the winter and holiday seasons. Dr. Province and Mr. McCulley will discuss system-wide plans and preparations to address the current surge and potential new surges prior to widely available COVID-19 vaccines.

COALVILLE OFFICE PARK CITY OFFICE KAMAS OFFICE 85 North 50 East, PO Box 128 650 Round Valley Drive 110 North Main Coalville, UT 84017 Park City, UT 84060 Kamas, UT 84036 435-336-3222 435-333-1500 435-783-4351 ext. 3071 Fax: 435-336-3286 Fax: 435-333-1580 Fax: 435-783-6021 www.summitcountyhealth.org STAFF REPORT

To: Summit County Council From: Kirsten Whetstone, MS, AICP- County Planner Date of Meeting: December 9, 2020 Subject: 2008 Summit Research Park Development Agreement Amendments Type of Item: Development Agreement Amendments Process: Work Session

I. Recommendation At this work session staff will present information regarding economic impact analysis of the proposed land uses. Staff will also provide information regarding General Plan goals and objectives related to Sustainability. The applicant will present key findings of the Economic Impact Analysis prepared by their consultant. No formal Council action is requested at this meeting.

II. Project Description

Project Name: Summit Research Park Development Agreement Amendments Applicant(s): Jeff Gochnour, Dakota Pacific Real Estate Property Owner(s): Park City Junction, L.L.C. Parcels: PCTC 401-AM, 402-AM, 403-AM, 404-AM, and 5B-AM Location: Southwest of SR 224 and West Ute Blvd at Kimball Junction Parcel Size: 58.26 acres (includes Skullcandy site, excludes Visitor Center, Transit Center, Richins Building and platted streets) Zone District: Community Commercial (CC) subject to Development Agreement Final Land Use Authority: Summit County Council

III. Background Please see attached Exhibit A- Staff Report from October 7, 2020 for Background Information. Please also find attached Exhibit B- Economic Impact Analysis. Exhibit E - link to Snyderville Basin General Plan. IV. Current Zoning and Vicinity Map

V. Description of Application (See Exhibit A- Staff Report from October 7, 2020 for description of Application, Review of Application for consistency with the General Plan, and draft findings of fact, conclusions of law, and conditions of approval)

2 VI. Economic Impact Analysis Reviewing proposals in terms of economic benefits is not central to the goals and objectives of the Snyderville Basin General Plan. However, ensuring that developments “pay their way” and do not create economic hardship on the County is important, and central to regulatory requirements spelled out in the Development Code. Because much was made of the Research Park’s promise to diversify the local economy, staff believes it is important to understand the economics of this current proposal. Staff requested the applicant provide an economic impact analysis to help answer questions raised about this proposal. The purpose of conducting an economic impact study is to ascertain the total cumulative changes in employment, earnings, and output to the Summit County economy as a result of the proposed project. The applicant submitted an Economic and Fiscal Impact Memorandum (see Exhibit B) prepared by Matt Prosser, with Economic and Planning Systems, in July 2020. The Memorandum outlines four primary findings regarding the proposed mixed-use plan. 1. Generation of $36 million annual taxable retail and lodging sales with 2,774 new residents and 1,034 new jobs at build out. 2. Generation of $5.3 million annual tax revenue at buildout from sales, lodging and property tax. 3. Generation of $15.4 million in development fees to cover services for permits, review fees, development impact fees (exclusive of SBWRD fees). 4. Generation of annual, on-going economic impact of $358 million at build out, in addition to $471 million in construction related one-time impacts.

County Staff reviewed the Economic and Fiscal Impacts Memorandum and recommends the applicant or consultant walk the Council through the use of the IMPLAN I-O model to further explain how the economic impact conclusions relating to jobs and industry data were arrived at. (See Exhibit C- Memorandum from Jeffrey B. Jones, County Economic Development & Housing Director, and additional economic data). The applicant will present the Analysis at the work session. Other data points to consider:

• The Area Median Income (AMI) for the County is defined each year by U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). For YR2020, the AMI for Summit County is $113, 900 for a four-person family (100% AMI). Using this figure as a base, Summit County calculates income qualification limits and maximum rent limitations by household size. • In Summit County, income/deed restricted rental properties the maximum monthly rent includes the cost of basic utilities.

3 • The State of Utah defines Moderate-Income Housing as “housing occupied or reserved for occupancy by households with a gross household income equal to or less than 80% of the median gross income for households of the same size in the county.” • The Federal Department of Housing and Urban Development defines affordable housing as “any housing unit whose costs are less than or equal to 30% of a prospective occupant’s household income.” • The Average Earnings Per Job in Summit County is $56,229 (Average Earnings Per Job = total annual earnings of all industries (wages, salaries, profits, benefits, and other compensation) divided by the number of jobs in total industries. • 11,502 people commute OUT OF Summit County for work every day • 16,322 people commute INTO Summit County for work every day • Park City has the greater imbalance with 11,716 people commuting INTO Park City and 2,093 people commuting OUT of Park City. • The County’s affordable housing/workforce housing agreements and deed restrictions include water fall provisions to help ensure that housing assets are made available to those who live and work in Summit County. • The daily import/export of workers into Summit County reflects an imbalance between the number and composition of jobs and the availability and cost of housing. • The growth in the number of short-term rental units in Summit County may also be impacting the supply of rental housing stock as it encourages landlords to move their properties out of the long-term rental and for-sale markets and into the short-term rental market. • There are additional costs to commuters to Summit County, in terms of time, cost of commute, social and community disconnection and exclusion, personal and family relationships, safety and weather-related issues, missed work and wages, etc.

VII. Sustainability Summit County adopted Resolution 2019-29 in November of 2019 (Exhibit D) that states the County will actively seek to: a. Reduce greenhouse gas emissions from County government operations by 80% below their 2016 level by 2040; and b. Implement strategies and policies to encourage the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions countywide by 80% below their 2014 level by 2050.

And included additional Renewable Energy Goals: Summit County will implement strategies and policies to: c. Transition to measured net 100% renewable electrical energy by 2030 for all of Summit County’s government operations; goal includes 50% renewable electrical energy for Summit County government operations by 2025; and d. Achieve an amount equivalent to 100% of the annual electric energy supply for participating customers from a renewable energy resource by 2030.

4 The proposal to allow residential uses and more diverse commercial and office uses presents opportunities to advance the County’s sustainability goals in three ways, namely 1) reduce vehicle miles travelled, 2) reduce Green House Gas (GHG) emissions, and 3) transition to net 100% renewable electrical energy goals for participating customers by 2030. Additional opportunities are presented that address both economic and social equity/resilience sectors of sustainability as outlined in the Summit County General Plan and the Kimball Junction Neighborhood Plan.

Vehicle Miles Traveled Based on the inflow and outflow of commuters into Park City and Summit County, the change of land uses to allow a variety of residential dwelling types located at a regional transportation hub provides the opportunity to reduce vehicle miles traveled. A reduction in GHG emissions from a primary source, that of transportation, will result.

In rural and suburban areas most mobility trips start and end at residential uses. By adding residential uses to an existing town center where retail, commercial, employment, pedestrian and transit infrastructure already exist, additional opportunities are presented to reduce vehicle miles travelled and associated reduction in GHG emissions. As the number of residents and employees increases near this transportation hub, there will be additional opportunities and incentives to invest in alternative transportation infrastructure at Kimball Junction.

Green House Gas Emissions The largest source of greenhouse gas emissions from human activities in the United States is from burning fossil fuels for electricity, heat, and transportation. Reducing vehicle miles travelled reduces GHG emissions. Reducing reliance on electricity from non-renewable sources also reduces GHG emissions. Transit oriented, mixed use developments such as the one proposed present opportunity to reduce GHG in non-regulatory ways. It is this pattern of development, as opposed to dispersed large lot neighborhoods and single use land uses, such as employment centers, that provides this opportunity. Additional benefits include better air quality, reduced congestion, and healthier lifestyles.

EPA tracks total U.S. emissions by publishing the Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks. This annual report estimates the total national greenhouse gas emissions and removals associated with human activities across the United States. The primary sources of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the United States are (www.epa.gov ): • Transportation (28.2 percent of 2018 greenhouse gas emissions) – The transportation sector generates the largest share of greenhouse gas emissions. Greenhouse gas emissions from transportation primarily come from burning fossil fuel for our cars, trucks, ships, trains, and planes. Over 90 percent of the fuel used for transportation is petroleum based, which includes primarily gasoline and diesel.2 • Electricity production (26.9 percent of 2018 greenhouse gas emissions) – Electricity production generates the second largest share of greenhouse gas emissions.

5 Approximately 63 percent of our electricity comes from burning fossil fuels, mostly coal and natural gas.3 • Industry (22.0 percent of 2018 greenhouse gas emissions) – Greenhouse gas emissions from industry primarily come from burning fossil fuels for energy, as well as greenhouse gas emissions from certain chemical reactions necessary to produce goods from raw materials. • Commercial and Residential (12.3 percent of 2018 greenhouse gas emissions) – Greenhouse gas emissions from businesses and homes arise primarily from fossil fuels burned for heat, the use of certain products that contain greenhouse gases, and the handling of waste. • Agriculture (9.9 percent of 2018 greenhouse gas emissions) – Greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture come from livestock such as cows, agricultural soils, and rice production. • Land Use and Forestry (11.6 percent of 2018 greenhouse gas emissions) – Land areas can act as a sink (absorbing CO2 from the atmosphere) or a source of greenhouse gas emissions. In the United States, since 1990, managed forests and other lands are a net sink, i.e. they have absorbed more CO2 from the atmosphere than they emit.

Renewable Energy and Energy Conservation Proposed land use amendments from strictly research and technology offices to mixed residential, a variety of office uses, hospitality, and support retail present opportunities for utilization of renewable energy, such as solar and ground source heat. The applicant indicates they will provide “solar ready” buildings. This means essentially the buildings and roof tops are oriented to south, southeast and they will run conduit from the roof to the electrical panel. They would be able to participate in the solar installation permit fee waiver program.

To commit to “solar now” they would have to calculate energy demand for each building and design systems to meet that amount (or some percentage) of electrical energy and install the solar system prior to certificate of occupancy. At this point in the process, the buildings are not yet designed, as the land use and concept site plan are under review, so energy calculations have not been done. Additionally, the applicants have indicated they would consider meeting a national green energy standard, such as LEED (without actual certification) or other. Net Zero for specific buildings (perhaps the hotel, office and for sale condo buildings) would be an important goal to pursue.

Location of a residential mixed use neighborhood in proximity to a transit hub that utilizes electric buses and provides electric shared bike rentals, further provides opportunities to increase use of renewable energy when these alternative transportation modes are connected to clean energy sources.

6 VIII. Snyderville Basin General Plan (see Exhibit E – Link to Snyderville Basin General Plan ) The standard of review for Development Agreements (and amendments) is a review and determination of consistency with stated goals and objectives of the Snyderville General Plan. To approve amendments to a development agreement, Council must make findings that proposed amendments are consistent with these goals and objectives. Conversely, to deny the requested amendments, the Council would have to make findings that the proposal is not consistent with these goals and objectives.

• Objectives of the Kimball Junction Neighborhood Plan- Kimball Junction Neighborhood Plan is a General Plan amendment that creates a concise vision for the future of the Kimball Junction neighborhood. The neighborhood plan provides an explanation of the legitimate public purpose and the “rational nexus” for making future land-use decisions in the area. It is not a Final Site Plan. It is not a set of Design Guidelines. It is not a transportation capital improvements schedule. As adopted by the County Council it expresses the desired future character of Kimball Junction and explains the path forward to achieving it. • The KJN Plan identifies opportunities to address and enhance the Kimball Junction built environment, as they relate to transportation and mobility, such as: o Improve flow of regional through traffic o Strengthen the neighborhood’s mix of uses o Centralize parking o Improve overall neighborhood connectivity and walkability o Enhance and expand community and civic spaces as part of a mixed-use neighborhood • The KJN Plan outlines several fundamental planning and community design principles that have been established for the future of the Kimball Junction neighborhood to achieve the above opportunities. The following principles relate to economic, sustainability, and community resiliency goals. o Create a Mixed-Use neighborhood designed with people in mind. Places where residential, retail, service and civic uses are connected by a network of public spaces. Mixed-use neighborhoods promote efficiencies in people, services, mobility, and infrastructure. o Create a People Oriented Built Environment with priority given to the needs of pedestrians rather than the movement of vehicles. Traditional, interior streets should not be dominated by large parking lots, blank building walls, service areas and utility infrastructure. The goal is to accommodate vehicles in an environment built for people. o Achieve a Seamlessly Connected Neighborhood that connects people to where they want to go in a simple, safe, comfortable, and enjoyable manner. o Create a Walkable Neighborhood that fosters a diversity of people, uses and experiences. Mixed use, walkable neighborhoods create a greater sense of community. o Create a Sustainable Community that addresses not only environmental and climate change issues (solar power, bike share, recycling, enhanced transit and

7 multi-modal connectivity, energy efficiency, etc.), but also makes positive economic and social progress for this and for future generations. Resilient communities include live, work, and play opportunities for all residents in a compact, complete, and connected manner. Resilient communities support local businesses and the local economy. o Design for Change to be flexible to respond to future changes in demographics and lifestyle. Design for energy and resource efficiency, create flexibility in uses of property, public spaces and service infrastructure and introduce new approaches to transportation, traffic management and parking. o Provide a Variety of Housing Choices, a key component of a strong and healthy (resilient) community that meets the diverse needs of the region, in a variety of forms that responds to our local context. o Provide live, work, and play opportunities for residents in a compact, complete, and connected manner creating a resilient community that can support local businesses and the local economy. o Provide a wide range of affordability giving people of all social and economic backgrounds the opportunity to live in a quality-built environment. o Strengthen the neighborhood’s mix of uses and fosters a diversity of people, uses and experiences to create a greater sense of community. o Enhance opportunities for community and civic spaces. o Provide transit-oriented development opportunities for traffic mitigation, environmental sustainability, neighborhood resiliency, and affordability. o Provide compact, complete, and connected space and uses for energy and resource efficiency, addressing climate change concerns and affordability. o Provide positive economic and social progress for this and for future generations. o Promote community participation in the neighborhood planning process

Both the inclusion of a diverse mix of housing and added flexibility in terms of types of office uses and support retail commercial uses are supported by the Kimball Junction Neighborhood Plan (KJNP). The KJNP outlines several fundamental planning and community design principles, established by a Blue-Ribbon Committee of community members for the future of Kimball Junction, to achieve defined opportunities for the entire neighborhood. The Plan states that “resilient communities include live, work, and play opportunities for all residents in a compact, complete, and connected manner.” Additionally, the Plan states that “resilient communities support local businesses and the local economy.”

The Kimball Junction Neighborhood Plan also recognizes the need to design for change. This includes designing for uses that are flexible and able to respond to future changes in demographics, lifestyle, climate, and the economy. Mixed uses, diversity of housing types, a range of office uses (health services, financial, venture capital, legal services, real estate, and other professional and technical services), as well as support commercial and retail establishments provide this flexibility and support the local economy.

8 IX. Snyderville Basin Development Code Section 10-3-19 D of the Snyderville Basin Development Code states the following as Criteria For Approval of Development Agreements:

2. The development agreement includes written consent by each landowner whose properties are included within the area described;

3. The county council, after receipt of a recommendation from the planning commission and review and consideration of the development agreement, finds that the specific proposals, terms and conditions contained in the agreement promote the intent of the general plan, result in benefits to the general public that would not otherwise occur under the literal application of this title, and effectively protect the health, safety and general welfare of the public; a public hearing is required to be held;

4. Development allowed under a development agreement shall comply with appropriate concurrency management provisions of this title, the infrastructure standards of this title, and all appropriate criteria and standards described in the development agreement;

5. When appropriate, based on the size of the project, the landowner or applicant agrees to, at a minimum, contribute all capital improvements and facilities necessary to mitigate the impacts of the project on the county and its special districts;

6. The landowner or applicant will mitigate all fiscal impacts on the general public;

7. Development shall not be permitted to create unacceptable construction management impacts;

8. While a creative approach to the development and use of the land and related physical facilities may be allowed by a development agreement, all development approved in the agreement shall meet or exceed development quality objectives of the general plan and this title;

9. The development shall be consistent with the goal of orderly growth and minimize construction impacts on public infrastructure within Snyderville Basin;

10. The development shall protect life and property from natural and manmade hazards; and

11. The development shall prevent harm to neighboring properties and lands, including nuisances. (Ord. 708, 12-10-2008; amd. Ord. 723, 7-22-2009)

X. Public Notice Staff will provide legal notice as required by the Code, for a public hearing once one is scheduled. Notice of the work session is provided with the Council meeting agenda, published on the County’s website.

9 XI. Next Steps Staff recommends a public hearing be scheduled in January 2021. At that meeting, Staff will provide a summary of the work session items and include a review of the above Development Agreement criteria as they apply to the proposed amendments.

XII. Recommendation Staff recommends the Council discuss proposed amendments to the 2008 Summit Research Park Development Agreement, focusing on economic impacts and sustainability related goals as identified in the Snyderville Basin General Plan. No formal Council action is requested at this meeting.

Attachments Exhibit A – October 7, 2020 Staff Report (not Exhibits) Exhibit B – Economic Impact Analysis - Matt Prosser, with Economic and Planning Systems Exhibit C – Memorandum from County Economic Development and Housing Director Exhibit D – Ordinance 2019-29 Exhibit E – Link to Snyderville Basin General Plan

10 EXHIBIT A

STAFF REPORT

To: Summit County Council From: Kirsten Whetstone, MS, AICP- County Planner Date of Meeting: October 7, 2020 Subject: 2008 Summit Research Park Development Agreement Amendments Type of Item: Development Agreement Amendment Process: Work Session

I. Recommendation Staff recommends the Council review the application to amend the 2008 Summit Research Park Development Agreement to allow a mix of land uses, including a variety of housing types, support uses such as retail, restaurants and hotel, and a range of office uses. The applicant will present a revised concept plan demonstrating how these uses, if allowed can create a mixed use, walkable connected neighborhood as envisioned by the Kimball Junction Neighborhood Master Plan.

II. Project Description Project Name: Summit Research Park Development Agreement Amendments Applicant(s): Jeff Gochnour, Dakota Pacific Real Estate Property Owner(s): Park City Junction, L.L.C. Parcels: PCTC 401-AM, 402-AM, 403-AM, 404-AM, and 5B-AM Location: Southwest of SR 224 and West Ute Blvd at Kimball Junction Parcel Size: 58.26 acres (includes Skullcandy site, excludes Visitor Center, Transit Center, Richins Building and platted streets) Zone District: Community Commercial (CC) subject to Development Agreement Final Land Use Authority: Summit County Council

III. Background On December 10, 2008, a previous property owner, Boyer Snyderville Junction L.C., entered into a Development Agreement with Summit County for development of the Summit Research Park (aka Park City Tech Center). See Exhibit A for Development Agreement and Exhibits A-C. (link to Recorded Development Agreement and all Exhibits). The Development Agreement was recorded on December 11, 2008, as Ordinance 698. In conjunction with approval of the Development Agreement, a re-zone of the property from Rural Residential and Hillside Stewardship to Community Commercial was adopted by Ordinance 706. Specific permitted and conditional uses were included as Exhibit C. Primary allowed uses are laboratories, offices and prototype production facilities related to research facilities and technology. Sports medicine related uses, including research and treatment facilities, churches, and incidental commercial uses to support allowed uses are also allowed. Public service and transit facilities, chamber bureau visitor’s center, and offices and/or research facilities for outdoor product companies are allowed as conditional uses.

An initial subdivision plat was recorded in 2010 creating six lots, known as the Park City Tech Center Subdivision. Lot 5 was amended creating 2 lots in 2012 and Lot 4 was amended creating 4 lots in 2016. An amendment to the Development Agreement was approved in 2014, providing clarity as to process for “use” determinations. The current application is contained to Lot 4 (as amended) and Lot 5B (e.g. Lots 401-404 of the Lot 4 Subdivision and Lot 5B of the Lot 5 Subdivision).

In the twelve years since approval of the Development Agreement, two buildings have been constructed, namely the Visitor Information Center/Offices (on Lot 5-A) and Skullcandy Corporate Headquarters (on Lot 401-AM). A public transit center was constructed on Lot 6 (Summit County). Roads, round-abouts, sidewalks, trails, utilities, storm drainage systems, and landscaping were installed and/or constructed.

Liberty Peak Apartments were constructed on Overland Trail providing 152 one- and two- bedroom deed restricted units on a 6.61-acre parcel (Lot 3). These rental units are affordable to residents earning below 60% of Summit County Average Median Income (AMI). These units were required by the Development Agreement to satisfy an affordable housing requirement for the entire Summit Research Park approval and are subject to a Housing Agreement (see Exhibits J and K of the 2008 Agreement). These apartments are fully occupied.

Acquired public open space and trails located to the south and west of the project area remain as open space and as originally zoned. These open space lands are not part of this application. A 4.37-acre church site (Lot 1) remains undeveloped and is owned by Property Reserve Inc. A 6.49-acre lot (Lot 2) is owned by Basin Recreation Special Service District. Neither of these lots are included in this application.

On August 2, 2019, Dakota Pacific Real Estate submitted application to amend the 2008 Summit Research Park Development Agreement (Development Agreement). The request included an amendment to the Use Table (Exhibit C of the Development Agreement) to allow a mix of residential unit types (apartments, condominiums, townhouses), support retail and commercial, hospitality and hotel use, as well as a variety of office uses consistent with the underlying Community Commercial District. The initial application included a concept plan showing County civic uses moved interior to the site, an expanded transit center/multi-modal hub along Hwy 224, a future gondola from the transit center through the site to the Olympic Park, and a pedestrian overpass connecting the east and west sides of the Kimball Junction neighborhood. Please see Exhibit B for the initial concept plan. 2 On March 24, 2020, following several work sessions with the Planning Commission, the applicant submitted a revised application responding to comments raised by the Commission and Staff. These revisions included reducing the overall square feet of development to be less than that described in Exhibit D of the Development Agreement. The applicant also clarified the affordable housing proposal as follows:

1. The proposed application includes 256 deed restricted Affordable Units (<80% AMI) and 844 market rate units, of which 50 are to be deed restricted to 80-120% AMI and are considered attainable units. 2. Snyderville Basin Development Code Chapter 5 (20% inclusionary zoning) requires 168 deed restricted Affordable units for the proposed uses. A surplus of 88 units is provided. 3. Chapter 5 requires 229.91 affordable unit equivalents (AUE) based on the number and type of units proposed and 232.1 AUE are proposed. A surplus of 2.19 AUEs. 4. The proposed Affordable units/AUE are in addition to the 152 affordable deed restricted units already provided and constructed at Liberty Peak Apartments that fulfill the housing requirement stipulated in Development Agreement for the 2008 entitlement.

The concept plan was also revised to include only those properties owned or controlled by Dakota Pacific. This removed the proposal to swap land with the County to move civic uses interior to the site in exchange for office uses on County property. It also set aside community transportation and mobility improvements due to on-going UDOT corridor planning and necessity for lengthy discussions regarding private-public partnerships required for those elements.

The applicant noted that they intend to retain the easement area necessary for a future gondola, landing area for a possible future crossing of Hwy 224, and have preserved the land area for a future expanded multi-modal transportation hub. The applicant reiterated that these items are still long-term goals.

In August 2020, following public hearings and much public and Commission input, the applicant submitted a further revised concept site plan and connectivity plan. These revisions provided live/work units and additional public gathering areas. Please see Exhibit C for the current concept plan and Exhibit D for the current connectivity plan. The traffic study summary (Exhibit E) and Economic Analysis (Exhibit F) are attached and will be presented by the applicant at the work session.

On September 8, 2020, the Planning Commission deliberated on the request to amend the Development Agreement to allow additional land uses. Following a failed motion to forward a positive recommendation to allow the amended uses, with a list of concerns outlined for further Council consideration, the Commission voted 5-2 to forward a negative recommendation to the Council. In forwarding a negative recommendation, the Commission outlined concerns for Council consideration. These included: 3 • A completely new Development Agreement should be prepared. • The mix/ratio of uses needed careful evaluation, • Density should be described for the new uses, • Net benefit of the proposed housing should be further studied, • The traffic study should be independently reviewed, • Other findings as provided on the record (see link below).

Please see the following link to the September 8th Planning Commission meeting.

https://summitcounty.box.com/s/p5xi1jpe0nd3qpwq62x6qjhmw2227tc1

IV. Current Zoning and Vicinity Map

V. Description of Application The applicant requests an amendment to the Development Agreement to allow a mixed-use neighborhood consisting of a variety of residential unit types, sizes, and affordability; as well as office, support commercial/ retail, and hospitality/hotel uses, as described below. Requested uses consistent with the underlying Zoning District. link to CC District and Code Land Use Chart

4 (Note: for comparison purposes of overall square footage, the current proposal 235,000-sf research/office includes the existing 45,000 sf Skullcandy Bldg. and the 30,000 sf Visitor Center)

Current Proposal Summary • Includes only Dakota Pacific controlled properties. • Transportation and Civic uses proposed with the initial application depend on possible land exchange with the County as well as planning and partnerships with UDOT and others and depend on the outcome of the UDOT Hwy 224 corridor study. These are future goals of the development. • Comparative square footages for residential, retail, office, and hotel are shown in the table above. Deed restricted housing is not included in the net totals. • Concept site plan includes 235,000 sf of office/research uses (75,000 sf are built), 19,000 sf of support retail/commercial, 122,500 sf of hotel/hospitality and 1,248,000 sf of residential (includes the deed restricted affordable housing units). Office uses are proposed as those allowed, low impact or conditional in the Community Commercial District. • The following uses are not proposed: Adult/sex oriented facilities and businesses; Auto repair; Construction related equipment rental and storage; Construction related wholesale goods; Truck stops; Drive-in and Drive-up businesses; RV, Boat, and Vehicle storage; Gas and fuel storage and sales; Gas station; Horse boarding and horse stables; and Hospital. Consider allowing a neighborhood vehicle charging/fueling station. • Includes 1,100 total residential units in a variety of types and sizes including for-rent studios to three- bedroom apartments, two and three-bedroom townhouses, live/work townhouse units and 80 for-sale market rate condominiums.

5 • Includes 256 deed restricted Affordable Units (<80% AMI) and 844 market rate units, of which 50 are to be deed restricted to 80-120% AMI and considered attainable units. • The applicant stipulates that Nightly Rental (short term rental) would not be allowed in residential units. • Snyderville Basin Development Code’s 20% inclusionary zoning requires 168 deed restricted Affordable units for the proposed uses (excluding Skullcandy and Visitor Center) and a surplus of 88 units is provided. • The Chapter 5 worksheets require 229.91 affordable unit equivalents (AUE) based on the number and type of units proposed and 232.1 AUE are proposed, a surplus of 2.19 AUEs. • These affordable units/AUE are in addition to the 152 affordable deed restricted units already provided at Liberty Peak Apartments to fulfill the housing requirement stipulated in the 2008 Agreement for the 2008 entitlement. • The applicant also proposes to permanently deed restrict an additional 50 units of “attainable” or “middle” income housing for those earning between 80% AMI and 120% AMI. This action is consistent with Ordinance Number 905 adopted on November 25, 2019, providing future affordability as addressed in the General Plan housing goals for attainable units. • The 50 attainable units are included in the 844 market rate units because they do not meet the “affordable” requirement of 80% or less AMI. • Parking is primarily structured in garages or beneath buildings in contrast to primarily surface parking allowed by the research park plan. • Surface parking for the office use on Lot 5B preserves future options for an underground parking/BRT enhanced transit center and possible pedestrian connections to east side of Kimball Junction. • Proposed mixed use concept plan provides useable open space within the neighborhood area and opportunities for playgrounds, trails, passive park land, plazas, and other public and neighborhood gathering spaces. • Multiple connections to adjacent trails and open space are proposed to enhance the walkability of the neighborhood. Locations and design will be coordinated with Basin Recreation. • Sidewalks and trails are provided within the neighborhood and to adjacent properties to connect people to, from and through the neighborhood and general Kimball Junction area.

6 Concept Site Plan

Concept Connectivity Plan

VI. Criteria for Review and Approval of Development Agreements (and Amendments) Amendments to the 2008 Agreement that alter or modify terms of the Agreement, the Allowed Uses, approved density or intensity of use that may be constructed consistent with the height limitations or open space requirements, and others as described in Development Agreement Section 1.11.1 are considered Substantial Amendments. Substantial Amendments require a public hearing and recommendation by the Planning Commission, with further public hearing and final action by the County Council. Amendments that are not Substantial Amendments are 7 considered Administrative Amendments, as further described in Section 1.11.2 of the Development Agreement.

Staff reviewed the request for a Substantial Amendment to the 2008 Development Agreement, to modify the Allowed Uses, for compliance with Snyderville Basin Development Code, Section 10-3-19 (D) (1-11) Criteria for Approval as follows:

1. The development agreement has been duly adopted in accordance with the provisions stated in this section, unless it comprises an SPA plan, in which case, it is subject to the adoption and approval provisions of section 10-3-11 of this chapter; To amend the land use table in Exhibit C, an amended Agreement and amended Land Use Table Exhibit shall be drafted for adoption by the Council, in accordance to provisions stated in this Section. All references to those land uses shall be amended in the Agreement and a revised concept site plan and connectivity plan shall be included. 2. The development agreement includes written consent by each landowner whose properties are included within the area described; An amended Agreement shall include written consent by each landowner within the specific amended Development Agreement area that would be subject to the amended Agreement. 3. The county council, after receipt of a recommendation from the planning commission, and review and consideration of the development agreement, finds that the specific proposals, terms and conditions contained in the agreement promote the intent of the general plan, result in benefits to the general public that would not otherwise occur under the literal application of this title, and effectively protect the health, safety and general welfare of the public; a public hearing is required to be held; County Council will review and consider whether the requested land uses promote the intent of the general plan, result in benefits to the general public that would not otherwise occur under the literal application of this title, and effectively protect the health, safety and general welfare of the public. County Council shall conduct a public hearing upon receipt of a recommendation from the Planning Commission. Planning Commission conducted public hearings on June 23, July 28, August 11, and August 25, 2020. Staff has reviewed the proposed amendment for consistency with the General Plan and with the Kimball Junction Neighborhood Plan, as noted below in Section VII. 4. Development allowed under a development agreement shall comply with appropriate concurrency management provisions of this title, the infrastructure standards of this title, and all appropriate criteria and standards described in the development agreement; The proposed amendment to the land use table does not change the concurrency provisions or infrastructure standards memorialized in the 2008 Agreement. 5. When appropriate, based on the size of the project, the landowner or applicant agrees to, at a minimum, contribute all capital improvements and facilities necessary to mitigate the impacts of the project on the county and its special districts; The proposed amendment to land uses does not change the capital improvements and facilities provisions and requirements memorialized in the 2008 Agreement. 6. The landowner or applicant will mitigate all fiscal impacts on the general public; Mitigation measures for fiscal impacts of development of the site were negotiated prior to the 2008 approval and are included in the 2008 Development Agreement. Any additional mitigation of 8 fiscal impacts on the public due to the change of uses, will be further discussed, and determined by the County Council and will be included in an amended Agreement. 7. Development shall not be permitted to create unacceptable construction management impacts; The proposed amendment to land uses does not change existing provisions and requirements of construction management impact mitigation memorialized in the 2008 Agreement. 8. While a creative approach to the development and use of the land and related physical facilities may be allowed by a development agreement, all development approved in the agreement shall meet or exceed development quality objectives of the general plan and this title; The proposed amendment to land uses does not relieve the applicant from existing Development Agreement requirements to meet or exceed development quality objectives of the general plan or the development code. 9. The development shall be consistent with the goal of orderly growth and minimize construction impacts on public infrastructure within Snyderville Basin; Phased approach to development of the site will be necessary for orderly growth and to minimize construction impacts on public infrastructure. Staff recommends conditions of approval, related to submittal of an overall phasing plan prior to approval of any Development Application, to be timely reviewed throughout the duration of development and consistent with the general phasing language in the 2008 Development Agreement. Phases shall stand on their own. Phases shall take into consideration timing of infrastructure and roadway improvements, including transit and UDOT work on Hwy 224 and the I-80 interchange. 10. The development shall protect life and property from natural and manmade hazards; The proposed amendment to land uses does not change existing provisions and requirements in the 2008 Agreement regarding protection of life and property from natural and manmade hazards. 11. The development shall prevent harm to neighboring properties and lands, including nuisances. The proposed amendment to land uses does not change existing provisions and requirements in the 2008 Agreement regarding prevention of harm to neighboring properties and lands, including nuisances.

VII. General Plan Review Amendments to Development Agreements are subject to review for consistency with the Snyderville Basin General Plan (Link to Snyderville Basin General Plan) and specifically with the recently adopted 2019 Kimball Junction Neighborhood Plan (beginning on Page 47 of the Snyderville Basin General Plan (link above)). Staff presented the objectives and opportunities of the 2019 Kimball Junction Neighborhood Plan at the August 11th and 25th public hearings and identified the planning and community design principles that were established in the Neighborhood Plan to achieve them. The request to amend allowed land uses in the 2008 Development Agreement, is consistent with the General Plan goals that include the following:

o Sustainability, both in terms of development and the environment, in that complete, connected, and compact development is the first tier of sustainability. o Quality growth and economic development that provides a positive contribution to the community’s quality of life and the mountain resort economy, by 9 providing live, work, and play opportunities for people of diverse social and economic backgrounds in a compact, complete, and connected quality-built environment. By creating a resilient community that can support existing local businesses and the local economy. o Improves the visual quality of the built environment by creating a sense of place with areas designed for a variety of experiences that are lively and pleasant to use, such as creating open space, green areas and gathering plazas in place of surface parking lots and office buildings that go dark after 5 pm. o Preservation of open space, view corridors and scenic mountainsides, by utilizing the existing development areas and setback parameters from Hwy 224 allocated to the Research Park, decreasing surface parking lots, increasing building separation and diversity of massing, and including wide connected sidewalks, interspersed pocket parks, connected trail systems and community gathering areas. o Preservation of Critical Lands (as defined in Section 10-4-3 of the Code) natural resources and the environment, including clean air and water, by utilizing existing development areas and maintaining existing open space. o Provide for interconnectivity and traffic mitigation through a variety of creative alternatives for all modes of transportation by developing a mixed use neighborhood in close proximity to transit center the uses can provide a catalyst for public and private investment in transit improvements that benefit the entire community. By enhancing pedestrian connectivity to, from and throughout the development providing interconnectivity for surrounding neighborhoods and uses. o Provision and inclusion of affordable housing as it provides a variety of housing choices, a key component of a strong and healthy (resilient) community that meets the diverse needs of the region, in a variety of forms that responds to our local context, by providing a wide range of affordability and unit types giving people of many social and economic backgrounds, including the “missing middle” the opportunity to live and work in a quality-built environment and contribute to community life. By exceeding minimum affordable housing requirements. By providing additional deed restricted Attainable housing units to ensure future affordability for an additional 50 units. By strengthening the neighborhood’s mix of uses it fosters a diversity of people, uses and experiences to create a greater sense of community.

The request to amend allowed land uses in the 2008 Development Agreement, is consistent with the 2019 Kimball Junction Neighborhood Plan element of the General Plan, in that the amendment to land uses: o Provides a variety of housing choices, a key component of a strong and healthy (resilient) community that meets the diverse needs of the region, in a variety of forms that responds to our local context.

10 o Provides live, work, and play opportunities for residents in a compact, complete, and connected manner creating a resilient community that can support local businesses and the local economy. o Provides a wide range of affordability giving people of all social and economic backgrounds the opportunity to live in a quality-built environment. o Strengthens the neighborhood’s mix of uses and fosters a diversity of people, uses and experiences to create a greater sense of community. o Creates a mixed-use neighborhood designed with people in mind, promoting efficiencies in people, services, mobility, and infrastructure. o Uses traditional neighborhood building – street patterns for town center development with buildings at the street, diversity of massing, wide connected sidewalks, interspersed pocket parks and community gathering areas, support retail and live-work space in proximity to residential, office, civic and transit uses. o Accommodates vehicles in an environment designed for people. o Provides more centralized parking and decreases surface parking lots o Improves overall neighborhood connectivity and walkability connecting people to adjacent land uses in a simple, safe, comfortable, and enjoyable manner. o Enhances opportunities for community and civic spaces. o Improves the visual quality of the built environment by creating a sense of place with areas designed for a variety of experiences that are lively and pleasant to use, such as creating open space, green areas and gathering plazas in place of surface parking lots. o Is designed to be flexible in response to future changes in demographics and lifestyle. o Provides transit-oriented development opportunities for traffic mitigation, environmental sustainability, neighborhood resiliency, and affordability. o Provides compact, complete, and connected space and uses for energy and resource efficiency, addressing climate change concerns and affordability. o Provides positive economic and social progress for this and for future generations. o Promotes community participation in the neighborhood planning process

Additional minor amendments to general street layout, block sizes and locations, trails and pedestrian connections, public gathering areas, and other architectural design and volumetric details, are considered Administrative Amendments as outlined in the 2008 Development Agreement. The Amended Development Agreement will specify the process for review and approval of specific development applications (such as Final Site Plans, Conditional Use Permits, and others).

VIII. Public Notice Public hearings were held on June 23rd, July 28th, August 11th, and August 25th, 2020. Notice of the public hearings was published in the Park Record and posted on the County’s (www.summitcounty.org) and the Utah Public Notice websites prior to each hearing. A

11 postcard was mailed to all property owners within 1,000 feet of the subject property prior to the June 23rd hearing. The public hearing was continued throughout the review period and closed after input was received on August 25th. Please see Exhibit G for written public input provided during Planning Commission review of this application. Public input ranges from opposition due to traffic, economic and character of development concerns to support due to reasons consistent with the vision of the Kimball Junction Master Plan. The applicant conducted two virtual open houses, developed a website (www.HeyKimballJunction.com), distributed posters throughout the Kimball Junction area, and requested public input on an on-line survey. Staff will provide legal notice as required by the Code, for a yet to be determined public hearing conducted by the County Council.

IX. Next Steps Staff proposes the following next steps:

• Schedule further work sessions as needed for clarification of any items of concern • Schedule initial public hearing • Schedule review of draft Development Agreement-possibly by subcommittee • Review of Amended Design Guidelines by CDD Staff • Council review of Development Agreement and public hearing • Final Council deliberation and vote

X. Recommendation Staff recommends the Council review and discuss at the work session, the application to amend the 2008 Summit Research Park Development Agreement to allow a mix of land uses, including a variety of housing types, support uses such as retail, restaurants and hotel, and a range of office uses. At the work session the applicant will present the concept plan demonstrating how these uses, if allowed can create a mixed use, walkable connected neighborhood as envisioned by the Kimball Junction Neighborhood Master Plan. The applicant will present the Concept Plan and proposed land uses, as well as the Traffic Analysis, Affordable Housing proposal, Economic Analysis findings, and other items related to the proposed change of land uses.

Staff provides the following draft findings of fact, conclusions of law, and possible conditions of approval to frame the work session discussion. Staff also requests Council input as to issues or topics the Council would like additional information or details on. Staff further requests input on the proposed schedule moving forward.

Draft Findings of Fact 1. On December 10, 2008, Boyer Snyderville Junction L.C., entered into a Development Agreement with Summit County for development of the Summit Research Park (aka Park City Tech Center). 2. The Development Agreement was recorded on December 11, 2008, as Ordinance 698. 12 3. In conjunction with approval of the Development Agreement, a re-zone of the property from Rural Residential and Hillside Stewardship to Community Commercial District was adopted by Ordinance 706. 4. Summit Research Park (aka Park City Tech Center) was approved in 2008 for research and tech related uses and support commercial uses dispersed over 22 development blocks. 195,000 square feet of workforce housing (152 units) and 3,910 parking spaces (primarily surface) were also included. 5. The 2008 Development Agreement has no statement of maximum allowable density. 6. The Community Commercial District does not include maximum density regulations; stating that “Density shall be determined by the ability of the proposed development to meet all required development and performance standards and criteria set forth in this title.” 7. Exhibit B of the Development Agreement includes a general Master Plan for the Research Park approval, including an area context map, general site plan, open space map, slope constraints map and aerial massing plans. 8. Exhibit C of the Development Agreement lists allowed, and conditional land uses for the Research Park, including restricted research office uses, support retail commercial, moderate income housing and a future church site. 9. Exhibit D of the Development Agreement consists of Design Guidelines, building volumetric, height and setbacks, architectural guidelines, and other parameters within which development can occur. In combination with the Development Agreement these guidelines outline development limits and desired development patterns. 10. Exhibit E of the Development Agreement is Chapter 4 (2008 version) of the Snyderville Basin Development Code- includes Standards for Approval of Development Permits and Exhibit F includes specific Height Regulations. 11. Exhibit G of the Development Agreement is the initial 2 lot Kimball Junction Subdivision plat that created the development parcel (Lot 1) and the surrounding open space (Lot 2) parcel. Amendments to the Kimball Junction Subdivision plat were recorded in 2010, 2014 and 2016. 12. Lot 1 of the Kimball Junction Amended Subdivision was subdivided into six (6) development lots, recorded in 2010 as the Park City Tech Center Subdivision. 13. Lot 5 of the Park City Tech Center Subdivision was amended creating 2 lots in 2012 (Park City Tech Center Lot 5 Subdivision) and Lot 4 was amended creating 4 lots in 2016 (Park City Tech Center Lot 4 Subdivision). 14. Exhibit H of the Development Agreements includes plan updates for a transit station and county uses. Exhibit I includes the preliminary Transportation Analysis for the Research Park. Exhibit J includes the Section 10-5-3 of the 2008 Development Code regarding Work Force Housing requirements. Exhibit K includes the Research Park Work Force Housing proposal. A 2007 Battelle Study – Characteristics and Trends in North American Research Parks is included. 15. Exhibit L is Sign Regulations of the 2008 Development Code. Exhibit M is Chapter Six of the 2008 Code- Installation and Guarantee of Development Improvements. Exhibit N is

13 Code Section 10-3-11 Sketch Plan submission requirements. Exhibit O is Code Section 10-2-7 - Community Commercial Zone. 16. Section 1.11 of the Development Agreement describes the process for Substantial and Administrative Amendments. 17. Amendments to the Agreement that alter or modify terms of the Agreement, the Allowed Uses, approved density or intensity of use that may be constructed consistent with the height limitations or open space requirements, and other amendments as described in Section 1.11.1 are considered Substantial Amendments requiring a public hearing and recommendation by the Planning Commission, with further public hearing and final action by the County Council. 18. Amendments that are not Substantial Amendments are considered Administrative Amendments as further described in Section 1.11.2 of the Development Agreement. 19. An amendment to the Development Agreement was approved in 2014, providing clarity as to process for “use” determinations. 20. On August 2, 2019, Dakota Pacific Real Estate applied to amend the Development Agreement allowed uses stipulated in Exhibit C to include a mix of residential unit types, support retail and commercial, hospitality and hotel uses, as well a variety of office uses as allowed in the CC District. 21. On March 24, 2020, following several work sessions with the Planning Commission, the applicant submitted a revised application responding to comments raised by the Commission. 22. On August 10, 2020, following public hearings, the applicant submitted a further revised concept site plan and a connectivity plan. Those revisions, along with the March 24th amendments, constitute the application currently under review. 23. The current application is contained to Lot 4 (as amended) and Lot 5B of the Park City Tech Center Subdivision. 24. The application includes only Dakota Pacific controlled properties. 25. Enhanced Transportation and Civic uses, as initial proposed, will depend on possible land exchange with the County as well as planning and partnerships with UDOT and the outcome of the UDOT Hwy 224 corridor study. 26. Proposed concept site plan includes 235,000 sf of office/research uses (75,000 are built), 19,000 sf of support retail/commercial, 122,500 sf of hotel/hospitality and 1,248,000 sf gross of residential (includes the deed restricted affordable housing units). 27. Office uses are proposed as those that are allowed, low impact or conditional in the Community Commercial District as listed in the Use Table- Section 10-2-10 of the Code. 28. The following uses are not proposed and should be restricted on an amended Exhibit C land use table: a. Adult/sex-oriented facilities and businesses b. Auto repair c. Construction related equipment rental and storage d. Construction related wholesale goods e. Truck stop f. Drive-in and Drive-up business

14 g. RV, Boat, and Vehicle storage h. Gas and fuel storage and sales i. Gas station (consider neighborhood vehicle charging and fueling station) j. Horse boarding and horse stables k. Hospital 29. The application and concept site plan include 1,100 total residential units in a variety of types and sizes including for-rent studios to three- bedroom apartments, two and three- bedroom townhouses, live/work townhouse units and 80 for-sale market rate condominiums. 30. Staff reviewed the request for a Substantial Amendment to the 2008 Development Agreement, to modify the allowed uses for compliance with Snyderville Basin Development Code, Section 10-3-19 (D) (1-11) Criteria for Approval, as described in this Staff Report and include herein those findings of compliance. 31. In the eleven years since approval of the Development Agreement, two buildings have been constructed, namely the Visitor Information Center/Offices (on Lot 5-A) and Skullcandy Corporate Headquarters (on Lot 401-AM). A bus transit center was constructed on Lot 6. Roads, round-abouts, sidewalks, trails, utilities, storm drainage systems, and landscaping were built. 32. Liberty Peak Apartments were constructed on Overland Trail providing 152 one- and two-bedroom deed restricted units on a 6.61-acre parcel (Lot 3), affordable to residents earning below 60% of Summit County Average Median Income (AMI). These units were required by the Development Agreement to satisfy an affordable housing requirement for the entire Summit Research Park approval. 33. Acquired public open space and trails located to the south and west of the project area remain as originally zoned and are not part of this application. A 4.37-acre church site (Lot 1) remains undeveloped and is owned by Property Reserve Inc. A 6.49-acre lot (Lot 2) is owned by Basin Recreation Special Service District. Neither of these lots are included in this application. 34. The Skullcandy Offices and Park City Visitor Center buildings were constructed under the 2008 Agreement. 35. Public open space and trails located to the south and west of the project were approved with the Tech Center approval and remain. These surrounding open space areas are not part of the Dakota Pacific development plan and no change of use of the open space areas are requested. 36. On September 24, 2019, staff and the applicant presented an initial review of the proposed application. 37. On October 8, 2019, staff presented a history of the 2008 Agreement and the applicant presented their vision, rationale, and context for requesting amendments to the 2008 Agreement. 38. On October 22 and November 12, 2019, the applicant presented further details on proposed land uses and general massing of proposed buildings. 39. On December 10, 2019, the applicant presented transportation and connectivity components.

15 40. On April 28, 2020, the applicant presented revisions to their initial application including a breakdown of uses and square feet, as well as a review of the required affordable housing units and proposal to include and deed restrict an additional 50 units as attainable units (80-120% AMI). 41. On June 23, 2020, the Commission conducted an initial public hearing. An overview of the proposal was presented as well as specific information about the land uses and the affordable housing component. 42. On July 28, 2020 the Commission conducted a continued public hearing and requested additional information regarding housing, transportation, site connectivity, and other items. 43. On August 11th and 25th, 2020 the Commission conducted a continued hearing and discussed transportation and economic analysis. 44. The public hearing was closed at the August 25th meeting. 45. The proposed application Includes 256 deed restricted Affordable Units (<80% AMI) and 844 market rate units, of which 50 are to be deed restricted to 80-120% AMI and considered attainable units. 46. Snyderville Basin Development Code Chapter 5 (20% inclusionary zoning) requires 168 deed restricted Affordable units for the proposed uses. A surplus of 88 units is provided. 47. Chapter 5 worksheets require 229.91 affordable unit equivalents (AUE) based on the number and type of units proposed and 232.1 AUE are proposed, a surplus of 2.19 AUEs. 48. The proposed Affordable units/AUE are in addition to the 152 affordable deed restricted units already provided and constructed at Liberty Peak Apartments to fulfill the housing requirement stipulated in the 2008 Agreement for the 2008 entitlement. 49. The applicant stipulates to permanently deed restrict an additional 50 units of “attainable” or “middle” income housing for those earning between 80% AMI and 120% AMI. This action is consistent with Ordinance Number 905 adopted on November 25, 2019, providing future affordability as addressed in the General Plan housing goals for attainable units. The 50 attainable units are included in the 844 market rate units because they do not meet the requirement of 80% or less AMI for Affordable. 50. The applicant stipulates that nightly rental uses would not be allowed in residential units. 51. Parking is proposed primarily as structured parking in garages or beneath buildings in contrast to primarily surface parking allowed by the research park plan. 52. Surface parking for office uses on Lot 5B preserves future options for an underground parking/BRT enhanced transit center and possible pedestrian connections to eastern Kimball Junction. 53. The proposed mixed-use concept plan provides more useable open space within the neighborhood area and opportunities for playgrounds, trails, passive park land, plazas, and other public and neighborhood gathering spaces in comparison to the research park uses. 54. Multiple connections to adjacent trails and open space are proposed to enhance the walkability of the neighborhood. Locations and design of trails will be coordinated with Basin Recreation. 16 55. Sidewalks and trails are provided within the neighborhood and to adjacent properties to connect people to, from and through the neighborhood and general Kimball Junction area. 56. The applicant submitted an updated Traffic Study (Fehr and Peers August 2020) reflecting the revised application. The Traffic Study and conclusions were presented to the Planning Commission on August 11 and August 25, 2020. 57. The Traffic Study concluded that the impact of the proposed land use amendments would have minimal impact on vehicle LOS and delay at most of the study intersections during typical weekday peak hours, except for three intersections. LOS (Level of Service) does not degrade below UDOT or County LOS standards. Three of the study intersections that have the most impact from traffic added by the development are a) I- 80/SR-242, b) Ute Boulevard/SR-224 and c) Tech Center/Landmark Drive. The first two intersections will continue to struggle to maintain LOS D conditions with or without the proposed development. This stretch of SR-224 is being studied by UDOT where potential mitigation measures will be evaluated. Minor mitigation to both Ute Boulevard/SR-224 and Tech Center/Landmark Drive could improve traffic operations in the area. 58. The Engineering Department has reviewed the updated traffic study and finds the methodology and findings to be reasonable. Initially it was thought that the new development would bring an approximate increase of 50% of daily trips from the originally approved land uses. On August 25, 2020 the applicant’s transportation consultant, Jim Charlier, presented a 2% decrease in daily trips when comparing “apples to apples” with the 2008 study. In calculating the trips for different land uses there are a range of different rates that can be used. Engineering has reviewed what Jim Charlier presented in that meeting when he converted the 2008 trip rates to 2020 trip rates and concluded that it has approximately the same daily trips and Engineering agrees with his methodology. In addition, there is a reduction to the AM and PM peak trips. There was no midday data provided for Research and Development land use, therefore we could not do a comparison of the original land uses and the proposed land uses. Based on time of day factor found in Jim Charlier’s last presentation, the midday traffic should be similar to the AM peak traffic. 59. Phasing and timing of build out is a concern. If the project is built out faster than UDOT has time to make modifications to the SR-224/Ute Blvd intersection, there will be an average delay per vehicle of 3.5 minutes. Looking at specific movements at this intersection, the southbound left turn at build out is expected to have a delay around 8 minutes. The eastbound left turning movement would experience a 6.5-minute delay, which would back up traffic to the roundabout causing it to fail. As a condition of approval, Engineering recommends that the proposed project is built in phases considering the impact of traffic on the surrounding roads, with clearly identified benchmarks that will allow evaluation of intermittent impacts. 60. Phasing and specific traffic mitigations are recommended to be included in the amended Development Agreement along with the updated Traffic Analysis.

17 61. To help mitigate the eastbound left turn movements from backing up into the roundabout, Engineering recommends eliminating the left turns from Ute Blvd into the library parking lot and left turns onto Landmark Loop. One of the mitigations measures suggested by the applicant would be to eliminate left turns out of the transit center onto Landmark Drive. This will need to be better understood on how it impacts transit service. This, in combination with traffic backing up to the roundabout on Ute Boulevard would bottleneck the transit center. With BRT being considered along Hwy 224, it is essential to keep the transit center flowing. 62. The applicant submitted a July 26, 2020 Economic and Fiscal Impacts Analysis prepared by Matt Prosser, Economic and Planning Systems. The Economic Analysis was reviewed by the County’s Economic Development Department and was presented to the Planning Commission on August 25, 2020. 63. The Economic Analysis outlines four primary findings regarding the proposed mixed-use plan. Those findings include 1) generation of $36 million annual taxable retail and lodging sales with 2,774 new residents and 1,034 new jobs at build out; 2) generation of $5.3 million annual tax revenue at buildout from sales, lodging and property tax; 3) generation of $15.4 million in development fees to cover services for permits, review fees, development impact fees (exclusive of SBWRD fees); and 4) generation of annual, on-going economic impact of $358 million at build out, in addition to $471 million in construction related one-time impacts. 64. Findings of the Economic Analysis suggest that the application to amend the land uses will not negatively impact the County economically and will likely increase economic activity in the area and provide support to existing local businesses. 65. The request to amend allowed land uses in the 2008 Development Agreement, is consistent with the General Plan goals that include the following: o Sustainability, both in terms of development and the environment, in that complete, connected, and compact development is an important aspect of sustainability. o Quality growth and economic development that provides a positive contribution to the community’s quality of life and the mountain resort economy, by providing live, work, and play opportunities for people of diverse social and economic backgrounds in a compact, complete, and connected quality-built environment. By creating a resilient community that can support existing local businesses and the local economy. o Improves the visual quality of the built environment by creating a sense of place with areas designed for a variety of experiences that are lively and pleasant to use, such as creating open space, green areas and gathering plazas in place of surface parking lots and office buildings that are mostly vacant after dark and on weekends. o Preservation of open space, view corridors and scenic mountainsides, by utilizing the existing development areas and setback parameters from Hwy 224 allocated to the Research Park, decreasing surface parking lots, increasing building separation and diversity of massing, and including wide connected sidewalks, 18 interspersed pocket parks, connected trail systems and community gathering areas. o Preservation of Critical Lands (as defined in Section 10-4-3 of the Code) natural resources and the environment, including clean air and water, by utilizing existing development areas and maintaining existing open space. o Provide for interconnectivity and traffic mitigation through a variety of creative alternatives for all modes of transportation by developing a mixed use neighborhood in close proximity to a transit center the uses can provide a catalyst for public and private investment in transit and mobility improvements that benefit the entire community. By enhancing pedestrian connectivity to, from and throughout the development, interconnectivity for surrounding neighborhoods and uses is enhanced. o Provision and inclusion of affordable housing as it provides a variety of housing choices, a key component of a strong and healthy (resilient) community that meets the diverse needs of the region, in a variety of forms that responds to our local context, by providing a wide range of affordability and unit types giving people of many social and economic backgrounds, including the “missing middle” the opportunity to live and work in a quality-built environment. By exceeding minimum affordable housing requirements. By providing additional deed restricted Attainable housing units to ensure future affordability for an additional 50 units. By strengthening the neighborhood’s mix of uses it fosters a diversity of people, uses and experiences to create a greater sense of community. The proposed deed restricted units are in addition to those already provided to satisfy the affordable housing requirements of the 2008 Agreement. 66. Proposed amendments to the land uses, as illustrated by the proposed concept site plan and connectivity plan, were reviewed for consistency with the Kimball Junction Neighborhood Plan finding that the amendments: o Provide a variety of housing choices, a key component of a strong and healthy (resilient) community that meets the diverse needs of the region, in a variety of forms that responds to our local context. o Provide live, work, and play opportunities for residents in a compact, complete, and connected manner creating a resilient community that can support local businesses and the local economy. o Provide a wide range of affordability giving people of all social and economic backgrounds the opportunity to live in a quality-built environment. o Strengthen the neighborhood’s mix of uses and fosters a diversity of people, uses and experiences to create a greater sense of community. o Create a mixed-use neighborhood designed with people in mind, promoting efficiencies in people, services, mobility, and infrastructure. o Allow utilization of traditional neighborhood building – street patterns for town center development with buildings at the street, diversity of massing, wide connected sidewalks, interspersed pocket parks and community gathering areas, support retail and live-work space in proximity to residential, office, civic and transit uses. 19 o Accommodate vehicles in an environment designed for people. o Provide more centralized parking and decreases surface parking lots o Improve overall neighborhood connectivity and walkability connecting people to adjacent land uses in a simple, safe, comfortable, and enjoyable manner. o Enhance opportunities for community and civic spaces. o Improve the visual quality of the built environment by creating a sense of place with areas designed for a variety of experiences that are lively and pleasant to use, such as creating open space, green areas and gathering plazas in place of surface parking lots. o Allow the development and design to be flexible in response to future changes in demographics and lifestyle. o Provide transit-oriented development opportunities for traffic mitigation, environmental sustainability, neighborhood resiliency, and affordability. o Provide compact, complete, and connected space and uses for energy and resource efficiency, addressing climate change concerns and affordability. o Provide positive economic and social progress for this and for future generations. o Provide opportunities for the “missing middle” to live and contribute to the community. o Promote a resilient community that includes live, work, and play opportunities for all residents in a compact, complete, and connected manner. Resilient communities support local businesses and the local economy. 67. The Kimball Junction Neighborhood Plan recognizes the need to design for change. This includes designing for uses that are flexible and able to respond to future changes in demographics and lifestyle. Mixed uses, diversity of both housing and types of office uses (health services, financial, venture capital, legal services, etc.), provide this flexibility and support the local economy. 68. The applicant conducted two virtual open houses, developed a website (www.HeyKimballJunction.com), distributed posters throughout the Kimball Junction area, and requested public input on an on-line survey. 69. The Planning Commission conducted public hearings on June 23rd, July 28th, August 11th, and August 25th. 70. On September 8, 2020, the Planning Commission voted 5-2 to forward a negative recommendation to change Exhibit C, the Land Use Table, citing issues with Transportation impacts, Economic Analysis, and uncertainty regarding the proposed uses. 71. The Planning Commission received much public input at the public hearings and through written comments. All written comments are compiled and part of the record of this application and have been forwarded to the County Council.

20 Draft Conclusions of Law 1. Proposed amendments to the 2008 Summit Research Park Development Agreement regarding land uses, are consistent with Section 10-3-19 of the Snyderville Basin Development Code. 2. Proposed amendments to the 2008 Summit Research Park Development Agreement, regarding land uses, as illustrated by the proposed concept site plan and concept connectivity plan, are consistent with the Snyderville Basin General Plan. 3. Proposed amendments to the 2008 Summit Research Park Development Agreement, regarding land uses, as illustrated by the proposed concept site plan and concept connectivity plan, are consistent with the Kimball Junction Neighborhood Plan, an element of the Snyderville Basin General Plan.

Draft Conditions of Approval Staff recommends the following conditions for consideration by the County Council: 1. A Housing Plan shall be included as an Exhibit to the Amended Development Agreement consistent with the revised land uses and Chapter 5- Affordable Housing. Housing Agreements shall be executed by the applicant and County prior to issuance of building permits for individual developments within the project area. 2. An overall Phasing Plan shall be included as an Exhibit to the Amended Development Agreement. The phasing plan shall be reviewed from time to time throughout the duration of development. Phases shall stand on their own. Phases shall take into consideration timing of infrastructure and roadway improvements, including transit and UDOT work on Hwy 224 and the I-80 interchange. 3. The August 2020 Traffic Study and specific recommended traffic mitigations and phasing shall be included as an Exhibit to the amended Development Agreement. The proposed development shall be built in phases that consider the impact of traffic on surrounding roads, with clearly identified benchmarks that allow evaluation of intermittent impacts. 4. An Amended Land Use Table shall be included as an Exhibit to the Amended Development Agreement. This amended Land Use Table shall be drafted in accordance with provisions stated in Snyderville Basin Development Code, Section 10-3-19 (D) (1- 11) Criteria for Approval Section. All references to allowed land uses will need to be amended in the Agreement to be consistent with the Amended Land Use Table. 5. The following uses shall be restricted on an amended Exhibit C - Land Use Table: Adult/sex oriented facilities and businesses; Auto repair; Construction related equipment rental and storage; Construction related wholesale goods; Truck stops; Drive-in and Drive-up businesses; RV, Boat, and Vehicle storage; Gas and fuel storage and sales; Gas station; Horse boarding and horse stables; and Hospital. Consider allowing a vehicle charging station with a neighborhood fueling pump in a location away from Hwy 224 that could reduce trips from the neighborhood to cross HWY 224 to refuel. 6. Design Guidelines specific to the proposed concept plan and land uses shall be included as an Exhibit to the Amended Development Agreement. Design Guidelines help to

21 establish the design vision and set parameters within which development can occur. In combination with the Development Agreement, Design Guidelines outline development limits, such as building volumetrics, heights and setbacks and provide a desired development pattern by including such items as urban design guidelines, architectural design guidelines, and landscape design guidelines that further define and describe the desired neighborhood character. These design guidelines can include architectural styles and materials, landscaping materials and themes, parking and street design, energy and sustainability goals, water conservation, outdoor lighting, wayfinding and signs, street furniture, trails and sidewalk design concepts, and other items that address the overall vision for the neighborhood.

Attachments Exhibit A – 2008 Summit Research Park Development Agreement and Exhibits A-C (link to Recorded Development Agreement and all Exhibits) Exhibit B – Initial Concept Site Plan Exhibit C – Revised Concept Site Plan Exhibit D – Revised Connectivity Plan Exhibit E - Traffic Study (summary) Exhibit F – Economic Analysis Exhibit G – Public Input received during the Planning Commission review (will be provided to the Council in a separate link)

22 EXHIBIT B

M EMORANDUM

To: Jeffery L Gochnour, Dakota Pacific Real Estate

From: Matt Prosser, Economic & Planning Systems

Subject: Kimball Junction Mixed-Use Development Economic and Fiscal Impacts Analysis; EPS #203085

Date: July 26, 2020

Dakota Pacific Real Estate (Dakota Pacific) is in process of obtaining approval for development of a large mixed-use development project near the interchange of I-80 and Highway 224 in the Snyderville Basin area of Summit County Utah. Dakota Pacific purchased a largely undeveloped site that is entitled for an office park and research & development uses. The current development program was approved in 2008. The program was entitled for over 1.2 million square feet of office uses. However, to date the project has only been able to attract development of two office buildings and 152 workforce housing units over 10 years. Dakota Pacific purchased the property in 2018 and is planning to build a mixed-use project that includes multifamily residential, townhomes, retail, office, and hotel uses. The project matches with current market demand and will likely be able to attract the diversity of uses planned in much shorter time period than the current rate of the current approved project.

To support the approval of its development plan, Dakota Pacific wanted to understand the economic and fiscal benefits that could be generated by the proposed project. This memorandum summarizes the estimated economic and fiscal impacts of the project based on the proposed development program. The fiscal impacts of the proposed project are compared to the estimated impacts of the approved development program (assuming it is able reach full buildout). The economic impact and development fees to be generated are also summarized. A summary of the approach and methodology to develop the impact estimates are also provided within the memorandum.

Dakota Pacific’s proposed project is referred to within this memorandum as the Kimball Junction Mixed-Use Project or Mixed-Use Project. The currently approved development on the site is referred to as the Summit Research Park or Tech Center.

203085-Memo_Kimball Junction Economic-Fiscal Impacts_072620.docx Memorandum: Kimball Junction Development Economic and Fiscal Impacts Analysis Page | 2

Summary of Findings

The major findings of the fiscal and economic impact analysis of the proposed Kimball Junction Mixed-Use Project are summarized below.

1. The proposed Kimball Junction Mixed-Use Project is estimated to generate $36 million in annual taxable retail and lodging sales in Summit County. The project will generate 2,774 new residents and 1,034 jobs within the Snyderville Basin area of Summit County that will substantially increase economic activity in the area. The proposed mixed-use project’s future residents, visitors, and workers are estimated to generate $36 million in annual taxable sales. The 1,100 housing units will be accessible to residents earning the full spectrums of incomes from 30% of AMI to market rate for-sale housing. The hotel uses will accommodate 83,463 annual visitors and 41,732 room nights. The non-residential uses will generate 1,034 new jobs with an estimated average wage for all jobs of $56,000, which is above the county-wide average ($49,720 in 2019 according to US Bureau of Labor Statistics). In addition, the activity generated by the project, Dakota Pacific is also investing over $15 million into regional and site infrastructure including sanitary sewer improvements, trails, and community gathering spaces that will serve the greater Snyderville Basin area.

2. The proposed Kimball Junction Mixed-Use Project is estimated to generate $5.3 million in annual tax revenue at buildout from sales, lodging, and property tax. The proposed mixed-use project’s Table 1. Annual Tax Revenue Summary future residents, visitors, and workers are estimated to generate $2.8 million in annual sales tax revenue Mixed Use Revenue Source Project Tech Center from sales in Summit County and $262,137 in annual lodging tax (Transient Room Tax) revenue from Sales Tax $2,821,090 $89,859 Lodging Tax $262,137 $0 hotel stays within the project, as Property Tax $2,217,332 $2,303,055 shown in Table 1. The land and Annual Total $5,300,559 $2,392,914 building improvements are estimated to generate $2.2 million in annual Source: Economic & Planning Systems property tax revenue. The proposed mixed-use project is estimated to generate more annual tax revenue than the existing Tech Center once it is built out. The Tech Center program is estimated to generate a total of $2.4 million per year comprised of $89,800 in sales taxes and $2.3 million in property taxes.

3. The proposed Kimball Junction Mixed-Use Project would also generate over $15.4 million in one-time development fees. The proposed mixed-use project is estimated to generate $3.1 million in one-time building permits and review fees as shown Table 2. The project would also pay over Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. Page | 3

$12.3 million in development impact fees. The impact fee estimate does not include the impact fees to the Snyderville Basin Water Reclamation District (SBWRD) for commercial uses as those fees are calculated by the SBWRD engineer and could not be estimated without additional understanding of the exact commercial uses that will locate in the project.

Table 2. One-time Development Fees Summary

Kimball Junction Revenue Source Mixed Use Project

Build and Permit Fees $3,104,385 Impact Fees1 $12,302,795

1 Does not include SBWRD commercial impact fees Source: Economic & Planning Systems

4. The proposed Kimball Junction Mixed-Use Project is estimated to generate an annual ongoing economic impact of $358 million on Summit County at buildout. The construction of the project will generate $471 million in one- time economic impacts. The proposed mixed-use project is estimated to generate an overall economic impact of $358 million annually to Summit County at buildout, as shown in Table 3. The project will generate 1,553 jobs including 1,034 direct jobs, 364 indirect jobs, and 155 induced jobs. The construction-related activity will generate $471 million in one- time economic impacts and generate 1,990 jobs during the construction period. The proposed Mixed-Use Project will generate a diversity of jobs both on site and also indirect and induced jobs. These impacts will likely be materialized in a shorter time period, as the Tech Center development has not been able to attract the employment uses, especially the sheer amount of jobs, promised with the development proposal.

Table 3. Economic Impact Summary

Item Mixed-Use Project

One-Time Economic Impacts of Construction One-Time Construction Impacts [1] $470.9 M One-Time Construction Jobs (Job Years) [2] 1,990 Annual Ongoing Economic Impacts Annual Ongoing Operational Impacts [3] $358.0 M Annual Ongoing Operational Jobs (Annual Average) [4] 1,553

Source: IMPLAN; Economic & Planning Systems [1] Includes direct and indirect impacts. [2] Employment includes both full-time and part-time workers. Job years refer to the number of jobs in each year summed over the entire construction period of the Project. [3] Includes direct, indirect, and induced impacts of the anticipated land uses within the Project. [4] Employment includes both full-time and part-time workers. Memorandum: Kimball Junction Development Economic and Fiscal Impacts Analysis Page | 4

Project Approach and Overview

Approach

The estimated fiscal and economic impacts of the proposed mixed-use project were analyzed. Three major impacts were estimated including tax revenues, development fee revenues, and economic impacts.

• Fiscal Impacts – The fiscal impacts are illustrated by the estimated annual tax revenue generated by the programs. The annual sales tax revenue, transient room tax (lodging tax), and property tax. The fiscal impacts for both the proposed mixed- used project and the approved Tech Center project are estimated for comparison.

• Development Fees – The estimated development fees to be generated by the proposed mixed-use project are calculated. Building and permit fees include building fees, plan review fees, plumbing permit fees, electrical permit fees, and mechanical permit fees. One-time impact fees assessed to new development in the Snyderville Basin area were also estimated (where possible) including the County Transportation Impact Fee, Snyderville Basin Special Recreation District Impact Fee, and the Snyderville Basin Water Reclamation District Impact Fee.

• Economic Impacts – The economic impacts of the proposed mixed-use project were estimated using the IMPLAN input-output economic model. IMPLAN is a software and database platform that allows users to estimate the impacts of land uses and development on specified areas of geography, in this case Summit County. The economic impacts are estimated based on project construction costs and estimated jobs within the project. The outputs include one-time impacts of construction (economic impacts shown in total dollars and construction jobs generated shown in job years). The outputs also include annual on-going economic impacts including total economic dollars and ongoing operational jobs including jobs directly on the project site (direct), indirect jobs, and induced jobs. Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. Page | 5

Development Program

The existing project site currently has 75,000 square feet of office uses in two buildings and 152 workforce housing apartment units. The existing development was not considered in this analysis as it was assumed to have the same impact on both project programs.

The proposed development program for the Kimball Junction Mixed-Use Project is shown in Table 4. The proposed mixed-use project includes 160,000 square feet of office use, 19,000 square feet of retail, and a 122,500 square feet hotel. It also includes 1,100 residential units including 306 income restricted workforce housing units, 714 market rate apartment units, and 80 for-sale townhomes. The proposed development program totals 1.6 million square feet comprised of 1.2 million square feet of residential and 376,500 square feet of commercial development.

The existing, approved Summit Research Park (Tech Center), if completed as proposed, would total 1.49 million square feet of development including 1.22 million of additional office and research park uses that are unbuilt.

In total, the Mixed-Use Project will result in 1.6 million square feet of development including 1,252 residential units. The Tech Center would result in 1.49 million square feet of development including 152 residential units.

Table 4. Kimball Junction Project Development Programs

Kimball Junction Land Uses Mixed Use Tech Center Project

Existing Office/Commercial (square feet) 75,000 75,000 Workforce Rental Housing (units) 152 152

Proposed/Planned Office/Commercial (square feet) 160,000 1,220,000 Retail 19,000 0 Workforce Rental Housing (units) 306 0 Market Rate Rental Housing (units) 714 0 For-Sale Townhomes (units) 80 0 Hotel (square feet) 122,500 0

Total Commercial/Office (square feet) 376,500 1,295,000 Residential (square feet) 1,248,000 195,000 Total (square feet) 1,624,500 1,490,000 Residential (units) 1,252 152

Source: Summit County, Dakota Pacific Real Estate Memorandum: Kimball Junction Development Economic and Fiscal Impacts Analysis Page | 6

Resident and Worker Generation Analysis

Future residents and employees that live and work on the site are the drivers of the estimated sales tax revenue generated by the project and on-going annual economic impacts. The estimated jobs and annual wages from nonresidential uses in both project programs are shown in Table 5. The estimated annual household income from each residential unit type is provided as well.

The Kimball Junction Mixed-Use Project is proposed to include 1,100 residential units within a mixture of apartment and townhomes. There would also be 306 workforce housing units available to potential residents earning between 30% of Area Median Income (AMI) up to 120% of AMI. The units are spread among these AMI cohorts with the majority of units planned for household earning between 30% and 80% of AMI. A total of 714 market rate apartment units and 80 market rate townhouses are also planned.

The project is estimated to generate 2,774 residents with an average household income of $79,575. The average household income for each housing product type were estimated based on the rental rate or home prices assumed for each project type. The mixed-use project will also have 301,500 square feet of nonresidential space, generating 1,034 jobs on site within an estimated average annual wage of $56,090

The Tech Center program is planned for 1.22 million additional square feet of office and research and development space and no additional residential development. This space would generate 3,050 jobs with an average annual wage of $67,088.

Table 5. Kimball Junction Program Demographic Summary

Kimball Junction Mixed-Use Tech Center

Housing Residents Per Estimated Estimated HH Residents Per Estimated Estimated HH Residential Program Housing Units Units Household Residents Income Household Residents Income

Workforce Rental Housing 30% to 50% AMI 128 2.5 320 $31,892 0 2.5 0 --- 60% to 80% AMI 128 2.5 320 $55,811 0 2.5 0 --- 100% to 120% AMI 50 2.5 125 $79,730 0 2.5 0 --- Market Rate Rental Housing 714 2.5 1,785 $80,000 0 2.5 0 --- For-Sale Townhomes 80 2.8 224 $190,000 0 2.8 0 ---

Total 1,100 2,774 $79,575 0 0 ---

Square Estiamted Estimated Estiamted Estimated Non-Residential Program Jobs per Sq Ft Square Feet Jobs per Sq Ft Feet Jobs Annual Wage 1 Jobs Annual Wage 1

Office / Flex R&D 2 160,000 272 588 $67,088 1,220,000 400 3,050 $67,088 Retail 19,000 500 38 $33,138 0 500 0 $33,138 Hotel 122,500 300 408 $45,284 0 300 0 $45,284

Total/Average 301,500 1,034 $56,090 1,220,000 3,050 $67,088

1 - Annual Wages estimated based on average annual w age in Summit County, Utah for corresponding employment industry. 2 - Employment in the office and flex R&D estimated to be split betw een four NAICS industries: 334=15%, 53=35$, 54=25%, 561=25% Source: Dakota Pacific Real Estate; ESRI; US Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS); Economic & Planning Systems Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. Page | 7

Retail Spending

A retail spending model was developed to estimate the retail sales that would be generated from residents and workers living and working on the project site. The retail spending analysis estimates the annual retail spending potential for residents and workers by retail store category. A sales flow analysis was completed to estimate the portion of total spending captured within Summit County versus spent outside the county by residents and workers. The average percentages of sales captured by store within Summit County by county residents and workers are applied to the expenditure potential from the residents and workers generated by the proposed project. Sales tax revenues are then estimated based on the portion of sales captured within the county.

The first step in the spending analysis is to estimate the total personal income (TPI) generated by the residents living in the proposed project. The Mixed-Use Project residents are estimated to have a TPI of $87.5 million as shown in Table 6. The TPI is calculated by multiplying the number of households (1,100) by the average household income ($79,575). The Tech Center has no additional households.

Table 6 Kimball Junction Project Residents’ Total Personal Income

Build Out

Mixed-Use Project Households 1,100 Avg. Household Income $79,575 Total Personal Income $87,532,500

Tech Center Households 0 Avg. Household Income $79,575 Total Personal Income $0

Source: US Census; ESRI; Economic & Planning Systems Memorandum: Kimball Junction Development Economic and Fiscal Impacts Analysis Page | 8

The TPI of the mixed-use project residents is applied to the average percent of retail sales made by Utah residents by retail store category. On average, a Utah resident spends 38.1 percent of their income on retail goods based on data from the 2017 US Census of Retail Trade for Utah. The project residents are estimated to generate $33.3 million in annual retail sales, as shown in Table 7.

Table 7. Kimball Junction Project Residents’ Expenditure Potential

MXD Project Retail Sales Build Out Store Type % TPI (2017) ($000s)

Total Personal Income (TPI) 100% $87,533

Convenience Goods Supermarkets 6.1% $5,329 Convenience Stores (incl. Gas Stations) 4.1% $3,567 Specialty Food and Beer, Wine, & Liquor Stores 0.6% $563 Health and Personal Care 1.9% $1,635 Total Convenience Goods 12.7% $11,095

Shopper's Goods General Merchandise Department Stores 0.6% $487 Warehouse Clubs & Supercenters, other GM 8.0% $7,002 Subtotal 8.6% $7,489

Other Shopper's Goods Clothing & Accessories 2.0% $1,784 Furniture & Home Furnishings 1.6% $1,434 Electronics & Appliances 0.9% $755 Sporting Goods, Hobby, Book, & Music Stores 1.3% $1,150 Miscellaneous Retail 0.9% $805 Subtotal 6.8% $5,927

Total Shopper's Goods 15.3% $13,416

Eating and Drinking 5.9% $5,122

Building Material & Garden 4.2% $3,690

Total Retail Goods 38.1% $33,323

Source: 2017 Census of Retail Trade; Economic & Planning Systems Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. Page | 9

The retail expenditure potential from workers employed on the project site was also estimated in addition to the resident expenditure potential. Based on surveys completed by the International Council of Shopping Centers (ICSC) the average office worker spends $5,272 annually on retail goods and services while at work. The total employment estimated for both development programs were used to estimate working spending. The total employment was discounted by 38.8 percent to account for workers that are also Summit County residents to avoid double counting. The annual expenditure potential by store type is estimated in Table 8.

Table 8. Kimball Junction Project Employees’ Expenditure Potential

Tech Center Mixed-Use Total Annual Total Annual Weekly Annual Expenditure Expenditure Spending Spending 1 Potential Potential

Employment 3,050 1,034 Non-Resident Employees 61.2% 61.2% Non-Resident Employment 1,867 633

Restaurants $26.29 $1,262 $2,355,500 $798,811

Goods and Services Department Stores $6.52 $313 $584,171 $198,107 Discount Stores $8.19 $393 $733,798 $248,850 Drug Stores $6.13 $294 $549,228 $186,257 Grocery $15.98 $767 $1,431,757 $485,546 Clothing $3.25 $156 $291,190 $98,750 Shoe $2.43 $117 $217,720 $73,835 Sporting Goods $2.16 $104 $193,529 $65,631 Electronics/Phone/Computers $4.86 $233 $435,440 $147,669 Jewelry $3.92 $188 $351,219 $119,108 Office Supplies $7.37 $354 $660,328 $223,934 Warehouse Clubs $7.80 $374 $698,855 $237,000 Other Goods $3.95 $190 $353,907 $120,019 Personal Care $7.83 $376 $701,543 $237,911 Personal Services $3.16 $152 $283,126 $96,015 Goods and Services Total $83.55 $4,010 $7,485,813 $2,538,631

Total $109.84 $5,272 $9,841,313 $3,337,442

1 - Annual is estimated as 48 w eeks to reflect time off Source: ICSC; Economic & Planning Systems Memorandum: Kimball Junction Development Economic and Fiscal Impacts Analysis Page | 10

A retail sales flow model was built to estimate the portion of retail sales to residents that are made in Summit County. The model estimates actual sales generated by ESRI and Info Group data at establishments in each store category (categories are based on NAICS for the retail trade industry 44-45). The actual sales are compared to the expenditure potential from residents and workers. EPS estimates sales capture rates of expenditure potential for residents and workers based on the existing store and retail mix within Summit County. This capture rate assumption results in an estimate of sales capture by consumer type which is residents, employees, and visitors (inflow). There was an estimated $875 million in retail sales made in retail stores in Summit County in 2020 (according to ESRI). EPS estimates the 62 percent of these sales were made to residents of the county, 32 percent were made to visitors to Summit County, and 6 percent were made to people working in Summit County who do not live in the county, as shown in Figure 1 and Table 9.

Figure 1. Summit County Estimated Retail Sales by Source

32%

62% 6%

County Residents County Non-Resident Workers Visitors to the County Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. Page | 11

Table 9. Summit County Retail Sales Flow Model

Resident Resident Capture Employee Employee Capture Inflow to Summit County Expenditure Ex. Pot. Sales Expenditure Sales Sales Potential Capture Capture Potential Ex. Pot. Capture Capture Actual Sales (2020) Rate Rate Est. Sales (2020) Capture Rate Est. Sales Rate Est. Sales Store Type ($000s) ($000s) % of Total % of Total ($000s) ($000s) % of Total % of Total ($000s) % of Total ($000s)

Total Personal Income (TPI) $2,251,677 $110,955

Convenience Goods Supermarkets $165,519 $137,093 90% 75% $123,384 $16,142 75% 7% $12,107 18% $30,028 Convenience Stores (incl. Gas Stations) $102,797 $91,768 90% 80% $82,591 $0 0% 0% $0 20% $20,206 Specialty Food and Beer, Wine, & Liquor Stores $23,378 $14,485 90% 56% $13,036 $0 0% 0% $0 44% $10,342 Health and Personal Care $22,306 $42,063 40% 75% $16,825 $6,192 75% 21% $4,644 4% $837 Total Convenience Goods $313,999 $285,408 83% 75% $235,836 $22,334 75% 5% $16,751 20% $61,413

Shopper's Goods General Merchandise Department Stores $5,594 $12,518 10% 22% $1,252 $14,859 25% 66% $3,715 11% $628 Warehouse Clubs & Supercenters, other GM $56,421 $180,124 25% 80% $45,031 $7,879 25% 3% $1,970 17% $9,420 Subtotal $62,015 $192,642 10% 75% $46,283 $22,739 25% 9% $5,685 16% $10,048

Other Shopper's Goods Clothing & Accessories $136,856 $45,892 90% 30% $41,303 $5,738 25% 1% $1,434 69% $94,119 Furniture & Home Furnishings $24,200 $36,877 60% 91% $22,126 $0 0% 0% $0 9% $2,074 Electronics & Appliances $45,752 $19,413 90% 38% $17,471 $4,909 75% 8% $3,682 54% $24,598 Sporting Goods, Hobby, Book, & Music Stores $29,868 $29,594 75% 74% $22,196 $3,960 25% 3% $990 22% $6,682 Miscellaneous Retail $57,487 $20,698 90% 32% $18,628 $11,435 50% 10% $5,717 58% $33,141 Subtotal $294,163 $152,474 80% 41% $121,724 $26,042 45% 4% $11,824 55% $160,615 Total Shopper's Goods $356,178 $345,116 49% 47% $168,007 $48,780 36% 5% $17,508 48% $170,662

Eating and Drinking $164,794 $131,766 75% 60% $98,824 $26,557 75% 12% $19,918 28% $46,052

Building Material & Garden $39,707 $94,918 40% 96% $37,967 $0 0% 0% $0 4% $1,740

Total Retail Goods $874,679 $857,208 63% 62% $540,635 $97,672 55% 6% $54,177 32% $279,867

Source: ESRI, 2017 Census of Retail Trade; ICSC Office Worker Retail Spending; Economic & Planning Systems Memorandum: Kimball Junction Development Economic and Fiscal Impacts Analysis Page | 12

The estimated capture rate of sales to residents and workers in Summit County was applied to expenditure potential from the residents and workers estimated to be generated by the Mixed-Use Project. The residents and workers from the Mixed-Use Project are estimated to generate $8.5 million in annual retail sales in Summit County, as shown in Table 10.

Table 10. Kimball Junction Mixed Use Project Estimated Annual Retail Sales

Kimball Junction Mixed use Project Resident Employee Total Capture Estimated Sales Store Type Exp. Potential Exp. Potential Exp. Potential Rate 2018

Convenience Goods Supermarkets $5,329,400 $485,546 $5,814,945 75% $4,361,209 Convenience Stores (incl. Gas Stations) $3,567,411 $0 $3,567,411 0% $0 Specialty Food and Beer, Wine, & Liquor Stores $563,081 $0 $563,081 0% $0 Health and Personal Care $1,635,156 $186,257 $1,821,413 75% $1,366,060 Total Convenience Goods $11,095,047 $671,803 $11,766,850 $0

Shopper's Goods General Merchandise Department Stores $486,638 $446,957 $933,595 25% $233,399 Warehouse Clubs & Supercenters, other GM $7,002,214 $237,000 $7,239,213 25% $1,809,803 Subtotal $7,488,852 $683,957 $8,172,809 $2,043,202

Other Shopper's Goods Clothing & Accessories $1,784,032 $172,584 $1,956,616 25% $489,154 Furniture & Home Furnishings $1,433,552 $0 $1,433,552 0% $0 Electronics & Appliances $754,652 $147,669 $902,321 75% $676,740 Sporting Goods, Hobby, Book, & Music Stores $1,150,457 $119,108 $1,269,564 25% $317,391 Miscellaneous Retail $804,628 $343,953 $1,148,581 50% $574,291 Subtotal $5,927,320 $783,314$0 $6,710,634 $2,057,576 Total Shopper's Goods $13,416,172 $1,467,271 $14,883,443 $4,100,778

Eating and Drinking $5,122,319 $798,811 $5,921,129 75% $4,440,847

Building Material & Garden $3,689,879 $0 $3,689,879 0% $0

Total Retail Goods $33,323,417 $2,937,885 $36,261,302 $8,541,625

Source: 2017 Census of Retail Trade; Economic & Planning Systems Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. Page | 13

The estimated annual retail sales from the Tech Center would only come from workers on the site as there is not additional residential planned. The workers at the Tech Center are estimated to generate $1.1 million in annual retail sales, as shown in Table 11.

Table 11. Tech Center Estimated Annual Retail Sales

Tech Center Resident Employee Total Capture Estimated Sales Store Type Exp. Potential Exp. Potential Exp. Potential Rate 2018

Convenience Goods Supermarkets $0 $1,431,757 $1,431,757 75% $1,073,818 Convenience Stores (incl. Gas Stations) $0 $0 $0 0% $0 Specialty Food and Beer, Wine, & Liquor Stores $0 $0 $0 0% $0 Health and Personal Care $0 $186,257 $186,257 75% $139,693 Total Convenience Goods $0 $1,618,014 $1,618,014 $0 Shopper's Goods General Merchandise Department Stores $0 $446,957 $446,957 25% $111,739 Warehouse Clubs & Supercenters, other GM $0 $237,000 $237,000 25% $59,250 Subtotal $0 $683,957 $683,957 $170,989

Other Shopper's Goods Clothing & Accessories $0 $172,584 $172,584 25% $43,146 Furniture & Home Furnishings $0 $0 $0 0% $0 Electronics & Appliances $0 $147,669 $147,669 75% $110,752 Sporting Goods, Hobby, Book, & Music Stores $0 $119,108 $119,108 25% $29,777 Miscellaneous Retail $0 $343,953 $343,953 50% $171,977 Subtotal $0 $783,314$0 $783,314 $355,651 Total Shopper's Goods $0 $1,467,271 $1,467,271 $526,641

Eating and Drinking $0 $798,811 $798,811 75% $599,108

Building Material & Garden $0 $0 $0 0% $0

Total Retail Goods $0 $3,884,096 $3,884,096 $1,125,749

Source: 2017 Census of Retail Trade; Economic & Planning Systems Memorandum: Kimball Junction Development Economic and Fiscal Impacts Analysis Page | 14

Hotel Visitation Analysis

The proposed hotel use within the Mixed-Use Project will be 122,500 square feet with an estimated 130 rooms and additional hotel amenities including dining options and conference space. The hotel is planned as a boutique hotel product aimed at luxury travelers. Hotel visitor and spending estimates were generated to estimate sales tax, tourism restaurant tax, and transient room tax (lodging tax). The assumptions (with data sources) used to estimate lodging related sales are shown in Table 12.

The proposed hotel uses is estimated to generate 30,843 annual room nights and 92,528 annual visitors. These visitors are estimated to spend $467 per person per night on lodging and retail while visiting, based on estimates from the University of Utah’s Gardner Policy Institutes’ annual tourism impact profile for Summit County. Hotel visitors are therefore expected to generate $7.9 million annually in lodging sales and $19.5 million in food, retail, and entertainment sales.

Table 12. Hotel Development Visitors’ Estimated Annual Spending

Hotel Estimates Factor Source

Hotel Assumptions Square feet 122,500 Dakota Pacific Real Estate Estimated Rooms 130 EPS Estimate Estimated Average Occupancy 65% Estimated stabilized occupancy rate Room Nights 30,843 EPS Estimate Average Guests per Room 3.0 EPS Estimate Estimated Annual Visitors 92,528 EPS Estimate

Daily Expenditure Assumptions Lodging (Average Daily Rate) $256 Utah Travel and Tourism County Profiles, 2018 - Gardner Policy Institute, Univ. of Utah Food/Drink $106 EPS Estimate Retail/Entertainment/Recreation $106 EPS Estimate Total $467 2017/2018 Ski Utah Skier Study/2017 Park City Summer Guest Study

Annual Spending Lodging $7,895,680 EPS Estimate Food Sales $9,761,651 EPS Estimate Retail/Entertainment Sales $9,761,651 EPS Estimate Total $27,418,983

Source: Economic & Planning Systems Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. Page | 15

Fiscal Revenue Analysis

This section provides estimates of fiscal revenues generated by the proposed Mixed-Use Project and is compared to the existing Tech Center project. The sales tax, lodging tax (transient room tax), and property taxes from the project area estimated. Also estimated are the development fees expected to be generated by the proposed mixed-use project.

Sales Tax

The proposed Mixed-Use Project is estimated to generate $26.2 million in retail sales, as shown in Table 13. The residents and employees from the project are estimated to generate $8.5 million annually in retail sales and visitors are estimated to generate $19.5 million in retail sales in Summit County. In addition, the hotel will generate $7.9 million in lodging sales, which results in $35.9 million sales that are subject to sales tax. Restaurant sales were broken out of the $28.1 million to estimate restaurant tourism tax and total $14.2 million.

The Tech Center program is estimated to generate $1.1 million in retail sales, no lodging sales, and $599,108 in restaurant sales.

Table 13. Kimball Junction Project Estimated Annual Sales by Type

Mixed Use Description Project Tech Center

Retail Sales Residents and Employees $8,541,625 $1,125,749 Visitors $19,523,303 $0 Total $28,064,928 $1,125,749

Lodging Sales $7,895,680 $0 Restaurant Sales $14,202,498 $599,108

Source: Economic & Planning Systems Memorandum: Kimball Junction Development Economic and Fiscal Impacts Analysis Page | 16

The estimated sales tax revenue from taxable retail sales, restaurant sales, and lodgings sales are provided in Table 14. The total sales tax rate in the Snyderville Basin Transit District is 7.45 percent. The $35.9 million in taxable sales generated by the Mixed-Use Project will generate an estimated $2.7 million in sales tax annually. In addition to the 7.45 percent, a 1.0 percent restaurant tourism tax is applied to sales at food establishments in counties that opt to apply the tourism tax including Summit County. The restaurant tourism tax is estimated to generate $142,025 from sales to the mixed- use project residents, workers, and visitors. Lastly, the lodging sales from the hotel use in the proposed project will generate an estimated $262,137 in transient room tax annually. In total, the Mixed-Use Project is estimated to generate $3.1 million in sales tax revenue. The Tech Center program is only estimated to generate $89,816 annually.

Table 14. Kimball Junction Project Estimated Annual Sales Tax Revenue

Mixed-Use Project Tech Center Rate Estimated Sales Tax Estimated Sales Tax

Estimated Sales (includes Lodging sales) $35,960,608 $1,125,749

Snyderville Basin Transit District State Sales and Use Tax 4.85% $1,744,089 $54,599 Local Sales and Use Tax 1.00% $359,606 $11,257 County Option Sales Tax 0.25% $89,902 $2,814 Mass Transit Tax 0.30% $107,882 $3,377 Additional Mass Transit Tax 0.25% $89,902 $2,814 County Option Transportation Tax 0.25% $89,902 $2,814 Transportation Infrastructure 0.25% $89,902 $2,814 County Transit 0.20% $71,921 $2,251 Botanical, Cultural, Zoo Tax 0.10% $35,961 $1,126 Sales Tax 7.45% $2,679,065 $83,868

Restaurant Sales $14,202,498 $599,108 Restaurant Tourism Tax 1.00% $142,025 $5,991

Estimated Lodging Sales $7,895,680 $0

Snyderville Basin Transit District County Transient Room Tax 3.00% $236,870 $0 State Transient Room Tax 0.32% $25,266 $0 Total 3.32% $262,137 $0

Total Tax $3,083,227 $89,859

Source: State of Utah; Economic & Planning Systems Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. Page | 17

Property Tax

Property market values were estimated as a basis for estimating annual property tax revenues. EPS utilized three sources of data on property values including construction cost estimates using RS Means and input from Dakota Pacific, development values based on achievable rental rates and sales prices, and actual market values and assessed values from recently developed buildings in Summit County based on the valuations given by the Summit County Assessor.

The Mixed-Use Project is estimated to have a total development value (land plus buildings) of $430.5 million at buildout, as shown in Table 15. The Tech Center is estimated to generate $305 million in total property value. The higher value for mixed- use development is generated by higher average property values from the more diverse development program and the additional total development space within the Mixed-Use Project program.

Table 15. Kimball Junction Project Estimated Property Value by Use Type

Description Square feet/units Estimated Value Value per Sq Ft/Unit

Tech Center Office/Flex 1,220,000 $305,000,000 $250

Kimball Junction Mixed-Use Project Office/Flex 160,000 $40,000,000 $250 Retail 19,000 $4,940,000 $260 Workforce Rental Housing (units) 306 $58,070,880 $189,774 Market Rate Rental Housing (units) 714 $218,094,545 $305,455 For-Sale Townhomes (units) 80 $56,000,000 $700,000 Hotel 122,500 $53,416,533 $436 Total $430,521,959

Source: Summit County Assessor, Dakota Pacific Real Estate, Economic & Planning Systems Memorandum: Kimball Junction Development Economic and Fiscal Impacts Analysis Page | 18

In the State of Utah, residents’ primary residences are entitled to an exemption of their property tax. The residents’ primary residence (either for-sale or rental units) will have a 45 percent reduction in the assessed value of the property they live in. As a result, the residential market values for a large portion of the Mixed-Use Project will have an assessed value lower than the actual market value. All of the rental units in the program are assumed to receive the exemption. Half of the townhome projects are assumed to be owned and occupied by Utah residents using the home as their primary residence. The other half is assumed to be owned by out of state owners or Utah residents as a second home. This estimate of half is based on the current housing vacancy rate in Summit County which is approximately 50 percent, which is driven predominately by units used for seasonal or recreational use (e.g. second homes, short term rental units). The total market value of the residential program is estimated to be $332 million. However, the assessed value is estimated to be $195 million as shown in Table 16.

Table 16. Mixed Use Project Estimated Residential Assessed Value

% Primary Full Tax Assessed Exempt Assessed Total Assessed Kimball Junction Mixed-Use Project Units Residence Units Value Units Value Value

Workforce Rental Housing 306 100% 0 $0 306 $31,938,984 $31,938,984 Market Rate Rental Housing 714 100% 0 $0 714 $119,952,000 $119,952,000 For-Sale Townhomes 80 50% 40 $28,000,000 40 $15,400,000 $43,400,000 Total 1,100 40 $28,000,000 1,060 $167,290,984 $195,290,984

Source: Economic & Planning Systems

The Mixed-Use Project is estimated to have a total assessed value of $293.6 million, which will generate $2.2 million in total annual property tax, as shown in Table 17. The Tech Center project is estimated to have a total assessed value of $305 million and generate an estimate $2.3 million in annual property tax, due to its entirely nonresidential program.

Table 17. Kimball Junction Project Estimated Annual Property Tax

Mixed Use Development Tech Center Description Tax Rate Residential Non-Residential Total Residential Non-Residential Total

Actual Market Value $332,165,425 $98,356,533 $430,521,959 $0 $305,000,000 $305,000,000 Assessed Value $195,290,984 $98,356,533 $293,647,517 $0 $305,000,000 $305,000,000

Taxing Entities Summit County Municipal Service 0.000559 $109,168 $54,981 $164,149 $0 $170,495 $170,495 Summit County General Fund 0.000756 $147,640 $74,358 $221,998 $0 $230,580 $230,580 State Assessing and Collecting 0.000009 $1,758 $885 $2,643 $0 $2,745 $2,745 Local Assessing and Collecting 0.000155 $30,270 $15,245 $45,515 $0 $47,275 $47,275 Weber Basin Water Conservation 0.000153 $29,880 $15,049 $44,928 $0 $46,665 $46,665 Park City Fire District 0.000667 $130,259 $65,604 $195,863 $0 $203,435 $203,435 Mosquito Abatement 0.000027 $5,273 $2,656 $7,928 $0 $8,235 $8,235 Snyderville Basin Recreation 0.000801 $156,428 $78,784 $235,212 $0 $244,305 $244,305 Park City School District 0.004384 $856,156 $431,195 $1,287,351 $0 $1,337,120 $1,337,120 Charter School Levy - Park 0.000040 $7,812 $3,934 $11,746 $0 $12,200 $12,200 Total 0.007551 $1,474,642 $742,690 $2,217,332 $0 $2,303,055 $2,303,055

Source: Economic & Planning Systems Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. Page | 19

One-time Development Fees

The one-time development fees assessed to new developments in the Snyderville Basin area were estimated for the Mixed-Use Project. To estimate the development fees, the estimated construction cost is needed. EPS estimated the construction cost for the project based on comparable project experience, input from Dakota Pacific, and utilizing RS Mean construction cost estimating software. The estimated construction value based on the International Building Code (IBC) and the International Residential Code (IRC) are also required to estimate building fees due to the valuation guidelines provided by Summit County. EPS estimates the total construction cost of the project to be $273 million, as shown in Table 18. The estimated construction valuation based on the Summit Code valuation guidelines driven by the IBC and IRC is $240 million.

Table 18. Mixed-Use Project Estimated Construction Cost and Valuation

Estimated IBC/IRC Square feet / Construction Cost per Valuation Description units Costs Sq Ft / Unit per Sq Ft IBC/IRC Valuation

Kimball Junction Mixed-Use Project Office/Flex 160,000 $32,480,000 $203 $181.12 $28,979,200 Retail 1 19,000 $3,990,000 $210 $154.36 $2,932,840 Workforce Rental Housing 306 $44,370,000 $145,000 $152.86 $53,068,545 Market Rate Rental Housing 714 $135,660,000 $190,000 $152.86 $123,826,605 For-Sale Townhomes 80 $21,200,000 $265,000 $102.91 $9,340,486 Hotel 122,500 $35,525,000 $290 $182.28 $22,329,300 Total $273,225,000 $240,476,976

1 Retail assumed to be 50% restaurant/bar and 50% retail shops Note: All residential units assumed to be same size (1,135 sq ft) for purposes of estimating IRC valuation Source: RS Means, Summit County, Dakota Pacific Real Estate, Economic & Planning Systems

The Building and Permit Fees that would be generated by the Mixed-Use Project are shown in Table 19. The project is estimated to generate $3.1 million in one-time building and permit fees. The estimated impact fees that will be generated by the Mixed-Use Project include the County Transportation Impact Fee, the Snyderville Basin Special Recreation District Impact Fee, and Snyderville Basin Water Reclamation District Impact Fee. EPS estimates the project will generate at least $12.3 million in impact fees for the three fee sources. The impact fees from commercial development for the Snyderville Basin Water Reclamation District were not calculated because the fees are based on estimated water use tied to specific uses proposed. EPS does not have sufficient information to estimate the fees and they are calculated by the SBWRD engineer based on construction plans. Memorandum: Kimball Junction Development Economic and Fiscal Impacts Analysis Page | 20

Table 19. Mixed Use Project Estimated One-time Development Fees

Mixed Use Development Description Rate Factor Unit Estimated Fee

Building and Permit Fees Building Fees Commercial 0.75% of IBC construction value $54,241,340 $406,810 Residential 0.75% of IRC construction value $186,235,636 $1,396,767

Permit Fees Commercial 65% of building permit fee $406,810 $264,427 Residential 65% of building permit fee $1,396,767 $907,899

Plumbing Permit Fee Commercial $0.030 per square foot 301,500 $9,045 Residential $0.025 per square foot 1,248,000 $31,200

Mechanical Permit Fee Commercial $0.030 per square foot 301,500 $9,045 Residential $0.025 per square foot 1,248,000 $31,200

Electrical Permit Fee Commercial $0.035 per square foot 301,500 $10,553 Residential $0.030 per square foot 1,248,000 $37,440

Total Building and Permit Fees $3,104,385

Impact Fees Transportation Impact Fees Business Park $2,234 per 1,000 sq ft 160 $357,474 Specialty Retail Center $5,584 per 1,000 sq ft 9.5 $53,046 Sit Down Restaurant $20,260 per 1,000 sq ft 9.5 $192,469 Hotel $1,282 per 1,000 sq ft 123 $157,001 Multifamily Residential $1,160 per unit 1,100 $1,276,440

Snyderville Basin Special Recreation District Impact Fees Commercial $0.56 per square foot 301,500 $168,840 Residential $3,444 per unit 1,100 $3,788,279

Snyderville Basin Water Reclamation District Residential 2 bedroom units $5,848 per unit 1,020 $5,964,960 3 bedroom units $8,772 per unit 80 $701,760 Commercial Dependent on use 8,772 per RE equivalent To Be Estimated by SBWRD Engineer

Total Impact Fees (less SBWRD fees for commercial) $12,302,795

Source: Economic & Planning Systems Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. Page | 21

Economic Impact Analysis

EPS prepared an Economic Impact Analysis of the proposed Mixed-Use Project. The purpose is to estimate the quantifiable one-time construction and ongoing operational impacts of the proposed project on the local economy with respect to jobs, income, and total economic output. The economic stimulus generated by the project will have a multiplying effect throughout the economy as local businesses, consumers, and employees associated with the project make local expenditures. This Economic Impact Analysis quantifies these impacts using an input-output (I/O) economic modeling system, which measures the change in regional economic activity resulting from a specific economic stimulus.

In this Economic Impact Analysis, the local economy is defined as Summit County, and the economic impacts measured include the direct contributions of the project, as well as indirect and induced impacts resulting from project construction and operations. Figure 2 illustrates the activities captured by this Economic Impact Analysis.

Figure 2. Economic Impact Analysis

Total Economic Impacts

DIRECT IMPACTS INDIRECT IMPACTS INDUCED IMPACTS Operating revenues and Business-to-business Spending of employee income employment transactions Example: A logistics center Example: Annual sales Example: industrial users employee spends their salary revenues from onsite purchase goods, such as office on groceries and household operations. supplies and equipment, expenses, generating sales for generating sales for other local other local businesses. businesses.

Source: EPS. Memorandum: Kimball Junction Development Economic and Fiscal Impacts Analysis Page | 22

The inputs into the IMPLAN economic model are shown in Table 20. The primary inputs to the model are the construction costs of the development program and the estimated number of jobs (by industry) that will be located at the project once built.

Table 20 Kimball Junction Project IMPLAN Inputs

Square feet / Description units Construction Costs Jobs NAICS Code

Kimball Junction Mixed-Use Project Office/Commercial (square feet) 160,000 $32,480,000 588 See Mix on the Right Office/Flex Use NAICS Mix Retail 19,000 $3,990,000 38 50% - 44-45, 50% 722 NAICS % of Jobs Workforce Rental Housing (units) 306 $44,370,000 0 334 15% Market Rate Rental Housing (units) 714 $135,660,000 0 53 35% For-Sale Townhomes (units) 80 $21,200,000 0 54 25% Hotel (square feet) 122,500 $35,525,000 408 72111 561 25%

Source: Economic & Planning Systems, Dakota Pacific Real Estate

The Mixed-Use Project has an estimated construction cost of $273 million, as shown in Table 21. The construction of the project is estimated to generate a total one-time economic output to the Summit County economy of $471 million. The construction of the project will also generate the need for 1,990 total job years.

The Mixed-Use Project is estimated to result in space to accommodate 1,034 jobs within multiple industry sectors within the office, retail, and hotel uses. The total annual ongoing operating impacts on the Summit County economy from the jobs located in the project is estimated to be $358 million. The 1,034 direct jobs will result in an additional 364 indirect jobs and 155 induced jobs, as shown in Table 22.

A mixed-use development, even with a more residential orientation, still generates positive economic impacts. The proposed Mixed-Use Project will generate a diversity of jobs both on site and also indirect and induced jobs. Table 23 shows the indirect and induced employment generated by the project in key industries including near 100 jobs in professional, scientific, and technical services. Other industries with indirect and induced employment being generated by the project include management of companies, real estate, administrative services, and other financial services. These impacts will likely be generated in shorter time period, as the Tech Center program has not been able to attract the types of jobs promised with the development proposal. Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. Page | 23

Table 21. Mixed-Use Project One-Time Construction Impacts

Impact Type Total One Time Activity/Impact Categories Direct Indirect Induced [1] Impacts

Key Input Project Construction Costs $273,225,000

One-Time Construction Impacts

Summit County Output [2] Industry Output (excl. Income) $273,230,000 $59,100,000 - $332,330,000 Income [3] $117,660,000 $20,940,000 - $138,600,000 Total Output $390,890,000 $80,040,000 $0 $470,930,000

Summit County Employment (Job years) [4] 1,623 367 - 1,990

Source: IMPLAN, 2018 Dataset, Summit County, Dakota Pacific Real Estate, EPS.

[1] Note that total construction impacts include direct and indirect impacts only; induced impacts were not estimated because construction activities are temporary and thus are not anticipated to generate net new household expenditures in the local economy. [2] Analysis based on Summit County data. Output is the amount of business expenditures on goods and services retained within the local economy. [3] Includes employee compensation, proprietors income, and other income (industry profits, rents, and royalties). [4] Employment includes both full-time and part-time workers. Job years refer to the number of jobs in each year summed over the entire estimated period of construction of the Project. For example, a single worker employed for two years would equate to two job years.

Table 22. Mixed-Use Project Annual On-going Operations Impacts

Total Impact Type Annual Ongoing Activity/Impact Categories Direct Indirect Induced Impacts

Key Input Ongoing Project Employment 1,034

Annual Ongoing Operating Impacts

Summit County Output [1] Industry Output (excl. Income) $194,140,000 $58,120,000 $21,620,000 $273,880,000 Income [2] $57,220,000 $19,820,000 $7,030,000 $84,070,000 Total Summit County Output $251,360,000 $77,940,000 $28,650,000 $357,950,000

Summit County Employment (Annual Average) [3] 1,034 364 155 1,553

Source: IMPLAN, 2018 Dataset, Summit County, Dakota Pacific Real Estate, EPS.

[1] Analysis based on Summit County data. Output is the amount of business expenditures on goods and services retained within the local economy. [2] Includes employee compensation, proprietors income, and other income (profits, rents, and royalties). [3] Reflects stabilized operational employment Project. Employment includes both full-time and part-time workers. Memorandum: Kimball Junction Development Economic and Fiscal Impacts Analysis Page | 24

Table 23 Summary of Key Industry Employment – Indirect and Induced Impacts

Key Indirect and Induced Employment Item by Industry [1]

Key Industry Category Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services 92 Food Services and Drinking Places 72 Management of Companies and Enterprises 46 Real Estate 45 Administrative and Support Services 42 Construction 21 Securities, Commodity Contracts, and Other Financial Investments and Related Activities 18 Wholesale Trade 14 Repair and Maintenance 13 Ambulatory Health Care Services 10 Personal and Laundry Services 10 Other Industries 1,169 Total Key Industry Employment 1,553

Source: IMPLAN; Economic & Planning Systems

[1] Reflects key industry indirect and induced employment supported by the direct economic activity generated by the project. EXHIBIT C

Staff Memorandum

To: Snyderville Basin Planning Commission

From: Jeffrey B. Jones, AICP, Econ. Development & Housing Director

Re: Kimball Junction Mixed-Use Development. Economic Impact Analysis

Date: August 20, 2020

To review the Economic Impact Analysis provided by Dakota Pacific I would recommend that the applicant or the applicant’s consultant walk the Planning Commission through the use of the IMPLAN I-O Model and how the economic impact conclusions relating to jobs and industry data were arrived at.

Input-Output Models (I-O Models)

It should be noted I-O models represent the flow of money in an economy (area of study), primarily among industries. The interactions among industries in an economy can be arranged according to a particular accounting system called “input-output accounts.”

A portion of the output (i.e. sales) of one industry will appear as the input (i.e. purchase) of other industries. These input-output accounts are used to build models that display the relationships between industries.

The main source of all I-O models in the United States is the Industry Economic Accounts produced by the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA). These tables provide a summary of how industries produce and consume commodities at the national level, showing which industries produce and consume which commodities, and in what amounts.

What is an industry?

An industry describes a type of economic activity that goes on at a particular establishment. Industries are usually sorted using the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS).

The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) assigns business establishments a six-digit code and category title, organizing them primarily by

Summit County 60 N Main Street, Coalville UT 84017 (435) 336 3200 similar production processes. Codes are hierarchical, and by removing digits from the end of a code you get a less detailed category code. For example:

23 – Construction 236 – Construction of Buildings 2362 – Nonresidential Building Construction 23622 – Commercial and Institutional Building Construction 236220 – [Identical to parent category]

What is an Occupation?

Working within these different industries are specific occupations. For example—manufacturing facilities, hospitals, corporate offices, and restaurants are all types of industries/establishments that employ janitors and/or accountants.

Occupation data is mostly organized by Standard Occupational Classification (SOC) codes. The first two digits divide occupations into 24 major groups, such as “11-0000: Management Occupations”; the third digit divides them into 96 minor groups, such as “11-3000: Operations Specialties Managers”; and the fourth digit divides them into 449 broad occupations, which are further divided by the fifth and sixth digits into a total of 775 detailed occupations.

Specific occupation data would make it possible to calculate “median” earnings per job as opposed to “average” earnings per job. And, resident worker (Occupation) data would also be made available when used on combination with the Census’ LODES program.

Staff has conveyed this to the applicant.

Average Earnings Per Job

Using the Industry Sectors identified by the applicant, Staff has provided the Average Earnings per Job for each sector.

Industry Sectors Jobs Ave. Earnings Per Job Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services in Summit 92 $91,906.00 County, UT Food Services and Drinking Places 72 $39,510.00 Management of Companies and Enterprises 46 $122,843.00 Real Estate Rental and Leasing 45 $62,517.00 Administration and Support Services 42 $57,222.00 Construction 21 $57,980.00 Securities, Commodity Contracts, and Other Financial 18 $197,766.00 Investments and Related Activities

Summit County 60 N Main Street, Coalville UT 84017 (435) 336 3200 Wholesale Trade 14 $117,052.00 Repair and Maintenance 13 $47,577.00 Ambulatory healthcare Services 10 $68,833.00 Personal and Laundry Servicers 10 $29,331.00 Other Industries 1116 $36,296.00

Deed Restriction Housing Projects Recently Entitled and/or Under Construction

• Silver Creek Village (Total 330 units); Sale and Rent 50% of the Units at <=80% AMI and 50% of the Units at <=60% AMI • Woodward Park City (Total 8 Units); 8 units (for rent); <=50% AMI • Promontory (Total 35 Units), 7 units in the next 24 months (for rent); Another 28 units within 5 years (for rent) <=80% AMI • Newpark Condos (Crandall Capital) 34 Units (80% AMI Average) (for rent), Average 80% AMI • Discovery (30 Units); 30 units (for sale), <=80% AMI • Canyons 1,107 Pillows (169 Units) = (Seasonal Worker/Employee Housing) (for rent), <=80% AMI • US Olympic Park, 56 units (for rent) Employee/athlete Housing/short term rental, <=80% AMI for the Employee/Workforce Units • Lincoln Station, 31 deed restricted affordable units (<=80% AMI)

Summit County 60 N Main Street, Coalville UT 84017 (435) 336 3200 Industry Snapshot

Emsi Q3 2020 Data Set

August 2020

Summit County Economic Development Department

60 North Main, P.O. Box 128 Coalville, Utah 84017

Emsi Q3 2020 Data Set | www.economicmodeling.com Page 1/8 Parameters

Industries: 21 items selected. See Appendix A for details.

Regions:

Code Descripon

49043 Summit County, UT

Timeframe: 2020 - 2025

Datarun: 2020.3 – QCEW Employees, Non-QCEW Employees, and Self-Employed

Emsi Q3 2020 Data Set | www.economicmodeling.com Page 2/8 21 Industries in Summit County, UT

Industry Summary for 21 Industries

30,729 +12.0% $56,229 Jobs (2019) % Change (2020-2025) Avg. Earnings Per Job (2019) 0% above Naonal average Naon: +4.6% Naon: $69,072

Industry Detail

Payrolled Business Locaons (2019) 3,041

Jobs Mulplier Only Available for 6-Digit

Unemployed (5/2020) 4.1K

Emsi Q3 2020 Data Set | www.economicmodeling.com Page 3/8 Regional Trends

% Region 2020 Jobs 2025 Jobs Change Change

A Region 31,875 35,710 3,835 12.0%

B Eastern Summit County 4,381 5,005 624 14.2%

C Western Summit County 27,427 30,626 3,199 11.7%

D United States 168,514,755 176,287,410 7,772,655 4.6%

E Utah 1,755,393 1,965,285 209,892 12.0%

F Wasatch County, UT 12,380 14,937 2,557 20.7%

G Salt Lake County, UT 824,062 912,429 88,367 10.7%

H Utah County, UT 305,144 351,283 46,139 15.1%

A Weber County, UT 120,970 133,102 12,132 10.0%

B Morgan County, UT 3,213 3,818 605 18.8%

Occupaons Employed by these Industries

Employed in % of Total Jobs in Descripon Industry Industry Group Group (2019) (2019)

Retail Salespersons 1,436 4.7%

General and Operaons Managers 1,357 4.4%

Waiters and Waitresses 1,134 3.7%

Fast Food and Counter Workers 906 2.9%

Maids and Housekeeping Cleaners 863 2.8%

Emsi Q3 2020 Data Set | www.economicmodeling.com Page 4/8 Industry Gender Breakdown

2019 Gender 2019 Jobs Percent

A Males 16,372 53.3%

A Females 14,356 46.7%

Industry Age Breakdown

2019 Age 2019 Jobs Percent

A 14-18 1,289 4.2%

A 19-24 3,937 12.8%

A 25-34 7,597 24.7%

A 35-44 6,518 21.2%

A 45-54 5,259 17.1%

A 55-64 4,094 13.3%

A 65+ 2,034 6.6%

Industry Race/Ethnicity Breakdown

2019 Race/Ethnicity 2019 Jobs Percent

A White 24,496 79.7%

A Hispanic or Lano 3,873 12.6%

A Asian 1,115 3.6%

A Black or African American 650 2.1%

A Two or More Races 367 1.2%

A American Indian or Alaska Nave 119 0.4%

Nave Hawaiian or Other Paciﬁc A 109 0.4% Islander

Emsi Q3 2020 Data Set | www.economicmodeling.com Page 5/8 Gross Regional Product (GRP)

$2.2B $663.9M $206.9M $3.0B Earnings (2019) Property Income (2019) Taxes (2019) Total GRP (2019)

Industry Requirements

Purchases from In-region Purchases Imported Purchases Total Purchases

Corporate, Subsidiary, and Regional Managing Oﬃces $4,123,168 $111,415,224 $115,538,392

Elementary and Secondary Schools (Local Government) $85,263,038 $29,785,798 $115,048,836

Lessors of Residenal Buildings and Dwellings $73,475,840 $3,168 $73,479,008

Oﬃces of Real Estate Agents and Brokers $57,066,992 $2,508 $57,069,500

Commercial Banking $16,322,280 $37,660,647 $53,982,927

Top Regional Businesses

Business Name Industry Name Business Size

Hotels (except Casino Canyons Resort Properes Hotels) and Motels 1,500 (721110)

Electronic Shopping and Backcountry.com Llc Mail-Order Houses 650 (454110)

Full-Service Restaurants Snow Park Restaurant 550 (722511)

General Medical and Park City Hospital Surgical Hospitals 335 (622110)

Surefoot Shoe Stores (448210) 330

Business Data by DatabaseUSA.com is third-party data provided by Emsi to its customers as a convenience, and Emsi does not endorse or warrant its accuracy or consistency with other published Emsi data.

Emsi Q3 2020 Data Set | www.economicmodeling.com Page 6/8 Appendix A - Industries

Code Descripon Code Descripon

11 Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunng Professional, Scienﬁc, and Technical 54 Services Mining, Quarrying, and Oil and Gas 21 Extracon Management of Companies and 55 Enterprises 22 Ulies Administrave and Support and Waste 56 23 Construcon Management and Remediaon Services

31 Manufacturing 61 Educaonal Services

42 Wholesale Trade 62 Health Care and Social Assistance

44 Retail Trade 71 Arts, Entertainment, and Recreaon

48 Transportaon and Warehousing 72 Accommodaon and Food Services

51 Informaon Other Services (except Public 81 Administraon) 52 Finance and Insurance 90 Government 53 Real Estate and Rental and Leasing 99 Unclassiﬁed Industry

Emsi Q3 2020 Data Set | www.economicmodeling.com Page 7/8 Appendix B - Data Sources and Calculaons

Industry Data Emsi industry data have various sources depending on the class of worker. (1) For QCEW Employees, Emsi primarily uses the QCEW (Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages), with supplemental esmates from County Business Paerns. (2) Non-QCEW employees data are based on a number of sources including QCEW, Current Employment Stascs, County Business Paerns, BEA State and Local Personal Income reports, the Naonal Industry-Occupaon Employment Matrix (NIOEM), the American Community Survey, and Railroad Rerement Board stascs. (3) Self-Employed and Extended Proprietor classes of worker data are primarily based on the American Community Survey, Nonemployer Stascs, and BEA State and Local Personal Income Reports. Projecons for QCEW and Non-QCEW Employees are informed by NIOEM and long-term industry projecons published by individual states.

Unemployment Data The unemployment data in this report comes from the Bureau of Labor Stascs' Local Area Unemployment Stascs and the Department of Labor's Characteriscs of the Insured Unemployed.

Staﬃng Paerns Data The staﬃng paern data in this report are compiled from several sources using a specialized process. For QCEW and Non-QCEW Employees classes of worker, sources include Occupaonal Employment Stascs, the Naonal Industry-Occupaon Employment Matrix, and the American Community Survey. For the Self-Employed and Extended Proprietors classes of worker, the primary source is the American Community Survey, with a small amount of informaon from Occupaonal Employment Stascs.

Input-Output Data The input-output model in this report is Emsi's gravitaonal ﬂows mul-regional social account matrix model (MR-SAM). It is based on data from the Census Bureau's Current Populaon Survey and American Community Survey; as well as the Bureau of Economic Analysis' Naonal Income and Product Accounts, Input-Output Make and Use Tables, and Gross State Product data. In addion, several Emsi in-house data sets are used, as well as data from Oak Ridge Naonal Labs on the cost of transportaon between counes.

DatabaseUSA.com Business-Level Data Data for individual businesses is provided by DatabaseUSA.com, which maintains a database of more than 14 million U.S. business enes. Note that in aggregate it will not be consistent with Emsi labor market data due to differences in definions, methodology, coverage, and industry/geographic classificaon.

State Data Sources This report uses state data from the following agencies: California Labor Market Informaon Department; Colorado Department of Labor and Employment; Idaho Department of Labor; Maine did not provide us with a data source; Montana Department of Labor and Industry, Research and Analysis Bureau; New Hampshire Department of Employment Security; New York Department of Labor, Division of Research and Stascs; Oregon Employment Department, Oregon Labor Market Informaon System; Utah Department of Workforce Services; Vermont did not provide us with a data source; Virginia Employment Commission, Economic Informaon Services; Washington State Employment Security Department, Labor Market and Economic Analysis Branch; Wyoming Department of Employment, Research and Planning

Emsi Q3 2020 Data Set | www.economicmodeling.com Page 8/8 Step One (1); Verify the income of each tenant 30% AMI 40% AMI 50% AMI 60% AMI 70% 80% and/or family to confirm that that all tenants AMI AMI and/or family qualifies for the respective income restricted units. Based on an AMI of $113,900. 1 Person $23,919 $31,892 $39,865 $47,838 $55,811 $63,784 2 Person $27,336 $36,448 $45,560 $54,672 $63,784 $72,896 3 Person $30,753 $41,004 $51,255 $61,506 $71,757 $82,008 4 Person $34,170 $45,560 $56,950 $68,340 $79,730 $91,120 5 Person $36,904 $49,205 $61,506 $73,807 $86,108 $98,410 6 Person $39,637 $52,850 $66,062 $79,274 $92,487 $105,69 9

Step Two (2): Establish unit pricing based on assumed Occupancy 80% AMI Total Income Per Maximum occupancies by unit type per Summit County Code. Unit based on Monthly Rent Occupancies and Including Utilities AMI % Based on AMI % Studio 1.00 80% AMI $63,784 $1,594.60

1 Bedroom 2.00 80% AMI $72,896 $1,822.40

2 Bedroom 3.00 80% AMI $82,008 $2,050.20

3+ Bedroom 4.00 80% AMI $91,120 $2,278.00

Income Tables Step Two (2): Establish unit pricing based on assumed Occupancy 60% AMI Total Income Per Maximum occupancies by unit type per Summit County Code. Unit based on Monthly Rent Occupancies and Including Utilities AMI % Based on AMI % Studio 1.00 60% AMI $47,838 $1,195.95

1 Bedroom 2.00 60% AMI $54,672 $1,366.80

2 Bedroom 3.00 60% AMI $61,506 $1,537.65

3+ Bedroom 4.00 60% AMI $68,340 $1,708.50

Step Two (2): Establish unit pricing based on assumed Occupancy 50% AMI Total Income Per Maximum occupancies by unit type per Summit County Code. Unit based on Monthly Rent Occupancies and Including Utilities AMI % Based on AMI % Studio 1.00 50% AMI $39,865 $996.63

1 Bedroom 2.00 50% AMI $45,560 $1,139.00

2 Bedroom 3.00 50% AMI $51,255 $1,281.38

3+ Bedroom 4.00 50% AMI $56,950 $1,423.75 Step Two (2): Establish unit pricing based on assumed Occupancy 30% AMI Total Income Per Maximum occupancies by unit type per Summit County Code. Unit based on Monthly Rent Occupancies and Including Utilities AMI % Based on AMI % Studio 1.00 30% AMI $23,919 $597.98

1 Bedroom 2.00 30% AMI $27,336 $683.40

2 Bedroom 3.00 30% AMI $30,753 $768.83

3+ Bedroom 4.00 30% AMI $34,170 $854.25 Selection Area = Summit County, Utah Selection Area = Park City, Utah Inflow/Outflow Job Counts (All Jobs) 2017 Count Share Employed in the Selection Area 26,673 100.0% Employed in the Selection Area but Living Outside 16,322 61.2% Employed and Living in the Selection Area 10,351 38.8% Living in the Selection Area 21,853 100.0% Living in the Selection Area but Employed Outside 11,502 52.6% Living and Employed in the Selection Area 10,351 47.4%

Selection Area = Summit County, Utah Inflow/Outflow Job Counts (All Jobs) 2017 Count Share Employed in the Selection Area 13,616 100.0% Employed in the Selection Area but Living Outside 11,716 86.0% Employed and Living in the Selection Area 1,900 14.0% Living in the Selection Area 3,993 100.0% Living in the Selection Area but Employed Outside 2,093 52.4% Living and Employed in the Selection Area 1,900 47.6%

Selection Area = Park City, Utah EXHIBIT D

Park City, Utah

December 9, 2020

The County Council (the “Council”) of Summit County, Utah, met in regular public session at the regular meeting place of the Council at the [Sheldon Richins Building in Park City, Utah], on Wednesday, December 9, 2020, at the hour of 3:45 p.m., with the following members of the Council being present:

Roger Armstrong Councilmember Doug Clyde Chair/Councilmember Kim Carson Councilmember Chris Robinson Councilmember Glen Wright Councilmember

Also present:

Tom Fisher County Manager Kent Jones Clerk

Absent:

After the meeting had been duly called to order and after other matters not pertinent to this resolution had been discussed, the County Clerk presented to the Council a Certificate of Compliance with Open Meeting Law with respect to this December 9, 2020, meeting, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A.

The following resolution was then introduced in written form, was fully discussed, and pursuant to motion duly made by Councilmember ______and seconded by Councilmember ______, was adopted by the following vote:

AYE:

NAY:

The resolution is as follows:

RESOLUTION NO. ______

A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNTY COUNCIL OF SUMMIT COUNTY, UTAH (THE “ISSUER”), AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF NOT MORE THAN $20,000,000 AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF SALES TAX REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2021; FIXING THE MAXIMUM AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF THE BONDS, THE MAXIMUM NUMBER OF YEARS OVER WHICH THE BONDS MAY MATURE, THE MAXIMUM INTEREST RATE WHICH THE BONDS MAY BEAR, AND THE MAXIMUM DISCOUNT FROM PAR AT WHICH THE BONDS MAY BE SOLD; DELEGATING TO CERTAIN OFFICERS OF THE ISSUER THE AUTHORITY TO APPROVE THE FINAL TERMS AND PROVISIONS OF THE BONDS WITHIN THE PARAMETERS SET FORTH HEREIN; PROVIDING FOR THE PUBLICATION OF A NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND BONDS TO BE ISSUED; PROVIDING FOR THE RUNNING OF A CONTEST PERIOD AND SETTING OF A PUBLIC HEARING DATE; AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING THE EXECUTION OF AN INDENTURE, A PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT, AN OFFICIAL STATEMENT, A BOND PURCHASE AGREEMENT, AND OTHER DOCUMENTS REQUIRED IN CONNECTION THEREWITH; AUTHORIZING THE TAKING OF ALL OTHER ACTIONS NECESSARY TO THE CONSUMMATION OF THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED BY THIS RESOLUTION; AND RELATED MATTERS.

WHEREAS, the County Council (the “Council”) of the Issuer desires to (a) finance all or a portion of the cost of various public works and infrastructure projects, and all related improvements (the “Series 2021 Project”), (b) fund any necessary debt service reserve funds, and (c) pay costs of issuance with respect to the Series 2021 Bonds herein described; and

WHEREAS, to accomplish the purposes set forth in the preceding recital, and subject to the limitations set forth herein, the Issuer desires to issue its Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2021 (the “Series 2021 Bonds”) (to be issued from time to time as one or more series and with such other series or title designation(s) as may be determined by the Issuer), pursuant to (a) the Local Government Bonding Act, Title 11, Chapter 14, Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended (the “Act”), (b) this Resolution, and (c) a General Indenture of Trust (the “General Indenture”), and a Supplemental Indenture (the “Supplemental Indenture” and together with the General Indenture, the “Indenture”), with such Indenture in substantially the form presented to the meeting at which this Resolution was adopted and which is attached hereto as Exhibit B; and

WHEREAS, the Act provides that prior to issuing bonds, an issuing entity must (a) give notice of its intent to issue such bonds and (b) hold a public hearing to receive input from the public with respect to (i) the issuance of the bonds and (ii) the potential economic impact that the improvement, facility or property for which the bonds pay all or part of the cost will have on the private sector; and

2 4850-7700-6802, v. 2 WHEREAS, the Issuer desires to call a public hearing for this purpose and to publish a notice of such hearing with respect to the Series 2021 Bonds, including a notice of bonds to be issued, in compliance with the Act; and

WHEREAS, there has been presented to the Council at this meeting a form of a bond purchase agreement (the “Bond Purchase Agreement”), in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit C to be entered into between the Issuer and the underwriter or the purchaser (the “Underwriter/Purchaser”) selected by the Issuer for any portion of the Series 2021 Bonds; and

WHEREAS, in the event that the Designated Officers (defined below) determine that it is in the best interests of the Issuer to publicly offer all or a portion of the Series 2021 Bonds, the Issuer desires to authorize the use and distribution of one or more of a Preliminary Official Statement (the “Preliminary Official Statement”) in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit D, and to approve one or more of a final Official Statement (the “Official Statement”) in substantially the same form as the Preliminary Official Statement, and other documents relating thereto; and

WHEREAS, in order to allow the Issuer flexibility in setting the pricing date of the Series 2021 Bonds to optimize debt service costs to the Issuer, the Council desires to grant to any one of the Chair or Chair pro tem (collectively, the “Chair”), the County Manager, or the Finance Officer (collectively, the “Designated Officers”), the authority to (a) determine whether all or a portion of the Series 2021 Bonds should be sold pursuant to a private placement or a public offering; (b) approve the principal amounts, interest rates, terms, maturities, redemption features, and purchase price at which the Series 2021 Bonds shall be sold; and (c) make any changes with respect thereto from those terms which were before the Council at the time of adoption of this Resolution, provided such terms do not exceed the parameters set forth for such terms in this Resolution (the “Parameters”);

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the County Council of Summit County, Utah, as follows:

Section 1. For the purpose of (a) financing the Series 2021 Project, (b) funding a deposit to a debt service reserve fund, if necessary, and (c) paying costs of issuance of the Series 2021 Bonds, the Issuer hereby authorizes the issuance of the Series 2021 Bonds which shall be designated “Summit County, Utah Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2021” (to be issued from time to time as one or more series and with such other series or title designation(s) as may be determined by the Issuer) in the aggregate principal amount of not to exceed $20,000,000. The Series 2021 Bonds shall mature in not more than twenty- one (21) years from their date or dates, shall be sold at a price not less than ninety-eight percent (98%) of the total principal amount thereof, shall bear interest at a rate or rates of not to exceed five percent (5.0%) per annum, as shall be approved by the Designated Officers, all within the Parameters set forth herein.

Section 2. The Designated Officers are hereby authorized to specify and agree as to the method of sale, the final principal amounts, terms, discounts, maturities, interest rates, redemption features, and purchase price with respect to the Series 2021 Bonds for and on behalf of the Issuer, provided that such terms are within the Parameters set by this

3 4850-7700-6802, v. 2 Resolution. The selection of the method of sale, the selection of the Underwriter/Purchaser, appointment of a Trustee, and the determination of the final terms and redemption provisions for the Series 2021 Bonds by the Designated Officers shall be evidenced by the execution of the Bond Purchase Agreement in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit C or a term sheet if the selected Underwriter/Purchaser prefers.

Section 3. The Indenture and the Bond Purchase Agreement in substantially the forms presented to this meeting and attached hereto as Exhibits B and C, respectively, are hereby authorized, approved, and confirmed. The Chair and County Clerk are hereby authorized to execute and deliver the Indenture and the Designated Officers are hereby authorized to execute and deliver the Bond Purchase Agreement in substantially the forms and with substantially the content as the forms presented at this meeting for and on behalf of the Issuer, with final terms as may be established by the Designated Officers within the Parameters set forth herein, and with such alterations, changes or additions as may be necessary or as may be authorized by Section 5 hereof. The Designated Officers are hereby authorized to select the Underwriter/Purchaser.

Section 4. Should the Designated Officers determine to have the Series 2021 Bonds underwritten, the Issuer hereby authorizes the utilization of the Preliminary Official Statement in the form attached hereto as Exhibit D in the marketing of the Series 2021 Bonds and hereby approves the Official Statement in substantially the same form as the Preliminary Official Statement. The Chair is hereby authorized to execute the Official Statement evidencing its approval by the Issuer.

Section 5. The Designated Officers or other appropriate officials of the Issuer are authorized to make any alterations, changes or additions to the Indenture, the Preliminary Official Statement, the Official Statement, the Series 2021 Bonds, the Bond Purchase Agreement, or any other document herein authorized and approved which may be necessary to conform the same to the final terms of the Series 2021 Bonds (within the Parameters set by this Resolution), to conform to any applicable bond insurance or reserve instrument or to remove the same, to correct errors or omissions therein, to complete the same, to remove ambiguities therefrom, or to conform the same to other provisions of said instruments, to the provisions of this Resolution or any resolution adopted by the Council or the provisions of the laws of the State of Utah or the United States.

Section 6. The form, terms, and provisions of the Series 2021 Bonds and the provisions for the signatures, authentication, payment, registration, transfer, exchange, redemption, and number shall be as set forth in the Indenture. The Chair and the County Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to execute and seal the Series 2021 Bonds and to deliver said Series 2021 Bonds to the Trustee for authentication. The signatures of the Chair and the County Clerk may be by facsimile or manual execution.

Section 7. The Designated Officers or other appropriate officials of the Issuer are hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver to the Trustee the written order of the Issuer for authentication and delivery of the Series 2021 Bonds in accordance with the provisions of the Indenture.

4 4850-7700-6802, v. 2 Section 8. Upon their issuance, the Series 2021 Bonds will constitute special limited obligations of the Issuer payable solely from and to the extent of the sources set forth in the Series 2021 Bonds and the Indenture. No provision of this Resolution, the Indenture, the Series 2021 Bonds, or any other instrument, shall be construed as creating a general obligation of the Issuer, or of creating a general obligation of the State of Utah or any political subdivision thereof, or as incurring or creating a charge upon the general credit of the Issuer or its taxing powers.

Section 9. The Designated Officers and other appropriate officials of the Issuer, and each of them, are hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver for and on behalf of the Issuer any or all additional certificates, documents and other papers (including, without limitation, any escrow agreement permitted under the Indenture and tax compliance procedures) and to perform all other acts they may deem necessary or appropriate in order to implement and carry out the matters authorized in this Resolution and the documents authorized and approved herein.

Section 10. After the Series 2021 Bonds are delivered by the Trustee to the Underwriter/Purchaser and upon receipt of payment therefor, this Resolution shall be and remain irrepealable until the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on the Series 2021 Bonds are deemed to have been duly discharged in accordance with the terms and provisions of the Indenture.

Section 11. The Issuer shall hold a public hearing on January ___, 2021 to receive input from the public with respect to (a) the issuance of the Series 2021 Bonds issued under the Act, and (b) the potential economic impact that the improvements to be financed with the proceeds of the Series 2021 Bonds issued under the Act will have on the private sector, which hearing date shall not be less than fourteen (14) days after notice of the public hearing is first published and such publication shall be made (i) once a week for two consecutive weeks in Park Record, a newspaper of general circulation in the Issuer, (ii) on the Utah Public Notice Website created under Section 63F-1-701, Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended, and (iii) on the Utah Legal Notices website (www.utahlegals.com) created under Section 45-1-101, Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended. The County Clerk shall cause a copy of this Resolution (together with all exhibits hereto) to be kept on file in the Summit County offices, for public examination during the regular business hours of the Issuer until at least thirty (30) days from and after the last date of the newspaper publication thereof. The Issuer directs its officers and staff to publish a “Notice of Public Hearing and Bonds to be Issued” in substantially the following form:

5 4850-7700-6802, v. 2 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND BONDS TO BE ISSUED

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN pursuant to the provisions of the Local Government Bonding Act, Title 11, Chapter 14, Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended (the “Act”), that on December 9, 2020, the County Council (the “Council”) of Summit County, Utah (the “Issuer”), adopted a resolution (the “Resolution”) in which it authorized the issuance of the Issuer’s Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2021 (the “Series 2021 Bonds”) (to be issued in one or more series and with such other series or title designation(s) as may be determined by the Issuer), and called a public hearing to receive input from the public with respect to (a) the issuance of that portion of the Series 2021 Bonds issued under the Act and (b) any potential economic impact that the Project described herein to be financed with the proceeds of the Series 2021 Bonds issued under the Act may have on the private sector. TIME, PLACE AND LOCATION OF PUBLIC HEARING

The Issuer shall hold a public hearing on January ___, 2021, at the hour of 6:00 p.m. at [60 North Main], Coalville, Utah. The purpose of the hearing is to receive input from the public with respect to (a) the issuance of that portion of the Series 2021 Bonds issued under the Act and (b) any potential economic impact that the Project to be financed with the proceeds of that portion of the Series 2021 Bonds issued under the Act may have on the private sector. All members of the public are invited to attend and participate. PURPOSE FOR ISSUING THE SERIES 2021 BONDS

The Series 2021 Bonds will be issued for the purpose of (a) financing all or a portion of the cost of various public works and infrastructure projects, and all related improvements (the “Series 2021 Project”), (b) funding any debt service reserve funds, as necessary, and (c) paying costs of issuance of the Series 2021 Bonds. PARAMETERS OF THE SERIES 2021 BONDS

The Issuer intends to issue the Series 2021 Bonds in the aggregate principal amount of not more than Twenty Million Dollars ($20,000,000), to mature in not more than twenty- one (21) years from their date or dates, to be sold at a price not less than ninety-eight percent (98%) of the total principal amount thereof, and bearing interest at a rate or rates not to exceed five percent (5.00%) per annum. The Series 2021 Bonds are to be issued and sold by the Issuer pursuant to the Resolution, including as part of said Resolution, a General and a Supplemental Indenture (together, the “Indenture”) which were before the Council in substantially final form at the time of the adoption of the Resolution and said Indenture is to be executed by the Issuer in such form and with such changes thereto as shall be approved by the Issuer; provided that the principal amount, interest rate or rates, maturity, and discount of the Series 2021 Bonds will not exceed the maximums set forth above. The Issuer reserves the right to not issue the Series 2021 Bonds for any reason and at any time up to the issuance of the Series 2021 Bonds. SALES AND USE TAXES PROPOSED TO BE PLEDGED

The Issuer proposes to pledge all or any portion of the revenues produced by local sales and use and excise taxes levied by the Issuer and legally permitted to be used for the 2020 Project (the “Revenues”).

6 4850-7700-6802, v. 2 OUTSTANDING BONDS SECURED BY PLEDGED TAXES

The Issuer currently has $7,955,000 of bonds outstanding secured by the Revenues. OTHER OUTSTANDING BONDS OF THE ISSUER

Additional information regarding the Issuer’s outstanding bonds may be found in the Issuer’s financial report (the “Financial Report”) at: http://secure.utah.gov/auditor- search/. For additional information, including any information more recent than as of the date of the Financial Report, please Matt Leavitt, Finance Officer at (435) 336-3017. TOTAL ESTIMATED COST OF BONDS

Based on the Issuer’s current plan of finance and a current estimate of interest rates, the total principal and interest cost of the Series 2021 Bonds to be issued under the Act to finance the 2021 Project, if held until maturity, is $24,859,793. A copy of the Resolution and the Indenture are on file in the office of Summit County Clerk, 60 North Main, Coalville, Utah, where they may be examined during regular business hours of the County Clerk from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, for a period of at least thirty (30) days from and after the date of publication of this notice. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that a period of thirty (30) days from and after the date of the publication of this notice is provided by law during which (i) any person in interest shall have the right to contest the legality of the Resolution, the Indenture (as it pertains to the Series 2021 Bonds), or the Series 2021 Bonds, or any provision made for the security and payment of the Series 2021 Bonds, and that after such time, no one shall have any cause of action to contest the regularity, formality, or legality thereof for any cause whatsoever and (ii) registered voters within Summit County, Utah may sign a written petition requesting an election to authorize the issuance of the Series 2021 Bonds. If written petitions which have been signed by at least 20% of the registered voters of Summit County, Utah are filed with the Issuer during said 30-day period, the Issuer shall be required to hold an election to obtain voter authorization prior to the issuance of the Series 2021 Bonds. If fewer than 20% of the registered voters of Summit County, Utah file a written petition during said 30-day period, the Issuer may proceed to issue the Series 2021 Bonds without an election. DATED this December 9, 2020. /s/Kent Jones County Clerk

7 4850-7700-6802, v. 2 Section 12. The Issuer hereby reserves the right to opt not to issue the Series 2021 Bonds for any reason, including without limitation, consideration of the opinions expressed at the public hearing.

Section 13. All resolutions or parts thereof in conflict herewith are, to the extent of such conflict, hereby repealed and this Resolution shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its approval and adoption.

Section 14. The Issuer hereby declares its intention and reasonable expectation to use proceeds of tax-exempt bonds to reimburse itself for initial expenditures for costs of the Series 2021 Project. The Series 2021 Bonds are to be issued, and the reimbursements made, by the later of 18-months after the payment of the costs or after the Project is placed in service, but in any event, no later than three years after the date the original expenditure was paid. The maximum principal amount of the Series 2021 Bonds which will be issued to finance the reimbursed costs of the Project is not expected to exceed $20,000,000.

8 4850-7700-6802, v. 2 APPROVED AND ADOPTED this December 9, 2020.

(SEAL)

By:______Chair

ATTEST:

By: County Clerk

9 4850-7700-6802, v. 2 (Other business not pertinent to the foregoing appears in the minutes of the meeting.)

Upon the conclusion of all business on the Agenda, the meeting was adjourned.

(SEAL)

By:______Chair

ATTEST:

By: County Clerk

10 4850-7700-6802, v. 2 STATE OF UTAH ) : ss. COUNTY OF SUMMIT )

I, Kent Jones, the duly appointed and qualified County Clerk of Summit County, Utah (the “County”), do hereby certify according to the records of the County Council of the County (the “County Council”) in my official possession that the foregoing constitutes a true and correct excerpt of the minutes of the meeting of the County Council held on December 9, 2020, including a resolution (the “Resolution”) adopted at said meeting as said minutes and Resolution are officially of record in my possession.

I further certify that the Resolution, with all exhibits attached, was deposited in my office on December 9, 2020, and pursuant to the Resolution, there was published a Notice of Public Hearing and Bonds to be Issued no less than fourteen (14) days before the public hearing date: (a) once a week for two consecutive weeks in the Park Record, a newspaper having general circulation within the County, the affidavit of which publication will be attached upon availability, (b) on the Utah Public Notice Website created under Section 63F-1-701, Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended and (c) on the Utah Legal Notices website (www.utahlegals.com) created under Section 45-1-101, Utah Code Annotated 1953, as amended.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my signature and impressed hereon the official seal of said County, this December 9, 2020.

(SEAL)

By: County Clerk

11 4850-7700-6802, v. 2

EXHIBIT A

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH OPEN MEETING LAW

I, Kent Jones, the undersigned County Clerk of Summit County, Utah (the “County”), do hereby certify, according to the records of the County in my official possession, and upon my own knowledge and belief, that in accordance with the requirements of Section 52-4-202, Utah Code Annotated, 1953, as amended, I gave not less than twenty-four (24) hours public notice of the agenda, date, time and place of the December 9, 2020, public meeting held by the County Council of the County (the “County Council”) as follows:

(a) By causing a Notice, in the form attached hereto as Schedule 1, to be posted at the principal offices of the County on ______, 2020, at least twenty-four (24) hours prior to the convening of the meeting, said Notice having continuously remained so posted and available for public inspection until the completion of the meeting;

(b) By causing a copy of such Notice, in the form attached hereto as Schedule 1, to be delivered to the Park Record on ______, 2020, at least twenty-four (24) hours prior to the convening of the meeting; and

(c) By causing a copy of such Notice, in the form attached hereto as Schedule 1, to be posted on the Utah Public Notice Website (http://pmn.utah.gov) at least twenty-four (24) hours prior to the convening of the meeting.

In addition, the Notice of 2020 Annual Meeting Schedule for the County Council (attached hereto as Schedule 2) was given specifying the date, time, and place of the regular meetings of the County Council to be held during the year, by causing said Notice to be (a) posted on ______, at the principal office of the County Council, (b) provided to at least one newspaper of general circulation within the County on ______, and (c) published on the Utah Public Notice Website (http://pmn.utah.gov) during the current calendar year.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my official signature this December 9, 2020.

(SEAL)

By: County Clerk

A-1

SCHEDULE 1

NOTICE OF MEETING

A-2 4850-7700-6802, v. 2

SCHEDULE 2

ANNUAL MEETING SCHEDULE

A-3 4850-7700-6802, v. 2

(attach Proof of Publication of Notice of Public Hearing and Bonds to be Issued)

A-4 4850-7700-6802, v. 2

EXHIBIT B

FORM OF INDENTURE

(See Transcript Document Nos.__ and ___)

B-1

EXHIBIT C

FORM OF BOND PURCHASE AGREEMENT

(See Transcript Document No. __)

C-1

EXHIBIT D

FORM OF PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT

(See Transcript Document No. __)

D-1

STAFF REPORT

To: Summit County Council From: Tom Fisher, County Manager Janna Young, Deputy County Manager Date of Meeting December 9, 2020 Type of Item: Consideration and possible adoption of the 2021 Work Plan Process: Regular Session

Requested Council Action Adoption of the 2021 Work Plan and renewal of the Council-Manager Compact.

Introduction In 2018, the County Council began adopting an official work plan for each budget cycle as a way to align the work with the resources and communicate to the public the areas where the County would focus staff hours and invest taxpayer dollars for that fiscal year. This approach was adopted after several years of the County taking on an ambitious, and sometimes unstructured, work schedule that was leading to staff burnout. The Council made the decision to more deliberately plan, budget, study, and make decisions about where to focus staff resources in order to do things better, complete long-standing projects, generate sustainable results, and make sure the County organization was not growing the need for staff without an analysis of priorities.

The Work Plan lists projects for each County office and department that either have a direct tie to the Council’s strategic priorities or are critical to advancing a County function but do not tie directly to the Council’s priorities. This list demonstrates to the public and the County organization the areas where staff hours will be spent.

To develop the Work Plan, each year, the County Manager’s Office works with the directors and leaders of the various County departments and offices to identify all the major tasks, projects, and work anticipated for the next year, both those that are specifically budgeted and the day-to-day work and responsibilities. Staff then associate a level of effort (Low, Medium, High) to the project, assign a priority ranking, and identify other departments or offices expected to contribute resources to the project to get a full picture of the overall impact on the County.

The County Manager then works with the Council to further narrow down those projects to a workload that is realistically achievable in the year, divided between those that are related to the Council’s strategic priorities and those that do not

have a direct tie but are important to complete. The final Work Plan is presented to the Council in a public meeting and adopted along with the next year’s budget.

Council’s Strategic Priorities In 2017, the County Council designed a strategic plan for the 2017-2019 period with the idea of going through another planning process in 2019 to establish priorities for 2020-2022. In 2019, the Council decided to keep the priorities established in the prior plan.

The County will be welcoming a new Council member in January 2021. That change, combined with the County’s ongoing response to the COVID-19 public health emergency, caused the Council to delay a thorough strategic planning process in 2020 and 2021 that considers new priorities for the next three to five years, including input from a broad community survey. Instead, the Council chose to maintain their current strategic priorities and undertake an in-depth strategic planning process for 2022 (Note: In 2021, the Council anticipates updating some of the language and focus areas of the current strategic effects).

The Council’s ongoing strategic priorities are:

1. Transportation and Congestion: The County will plan for and make improvements to our transportation system to reduce traffic congestion 2. Workforce Housing: The County will facilitate efforts to significantly decrease the deficit in workforce/affordable housing to have more community members who work and live in the County 3. Environmental Stewardship: The County will implement plans and policies to secure, preserve, and protect our water, land, and air quality for the present and the future 4. Refine County General Plans and Development Codes: The County will review and refine the General Plans and Development Codes focusing on improving and connecting the region’s physical, natural, and economic environments and communities 5. Mental Wellness and Substance Abuse Issues: The County will promote community awareness of mental wellness and substance abuse issues and increased access to effective treatment and prevention services and programs

The Council met with staff in early November 2020 to discuss proposed projects that advance these strategic priorities. After that meeting, the Council members, individually, completed a short survey to provide additional direction to the County Manager for a final Work Plan proposal he will present to the Council at the same meeting the 2021 budget is considered and potentially adopted. The survey focused on questions involving the workload for County Administration, Community Development, Finance, and Solid Waste.

Considerations for 2021 Based on the feedback from the Council survey and the many unknowns projected for 2021, the County Manager is recommending a conservative Work Plan for 2021 with a reduced workload compared to previous years. The following considerations factored into this direction:

1. COVID-19 Public Health Emergency: Summit County will continue to devote unknown levels, but probably significant resources to the response and mitigation of the COVID-19 virus in 2021. The biggest effort anticipated next year is management and implementation of mass vaccinations, most likely in the summer. This effort will require many employee resources, taking hours away from other County business and Council priorities. Additionally, there is still a great deal of uncertainty surrounding the virus and what will occur at the state and national levels in 2021. Due to this uncertainty, which will characterize much of next year, most likely into the third quarter, it is wise not to overcommit to ambitious projects outside of the ongoing emergency.

2. Economic Effects from COVID-19: Another unknown about 2021 is the entire impact the COVID-19 public health emergency will have on our local economy and more specifically, the County budget. While we will have a ski season, we know the Sundance Festival is scaled down and other major events that had been planned and would have generated significant economic activity will not be occurring in 2021. We cannot yet predict the impact on the County’s revenues nor how long the recovery will take or what it looks like. This is another reason why the Work Plan proposed for 2021 is conservative. The County is currently under a hiring freeze, which will continue into next year, therefore limiting the staff hours the County can access to get work done. With likely further reductions in revenues, the County may experience additional staffing challenges.

3. Unknown of the Unknown: We anticipate there being critical issues that pop up that are currently unknown, which occurs every year -- possibly two to three things we did not think of but will take a significant amount of time and staff resources to address or work on. Examples of these unknown issues from this year are the Hideout litigation, analysis and discussion of the EMS system, and decision to separate from the Park City Transit District to take on a more regional role in transit. We need to leave room in the Work Plan to respond to these unknown but urgent issues.

Summary of Proposed 2021 Work Plan In consideration of the overlaying factors that will characterize 2021 discussed previously in this report, below is a highlight of the areas of focus for 2021:

1. Administration: County Administration’s work in 2021 will be primarily serving as project manager and facilitator of several initiatives, such as: a. Updates to the Council’s strategic effects b. Project selection and schedules for both the capital facilities and RAP Tax Recreation bond programs c. Analysis of the management of emergency medical services d. Master planning of Marion Park e. An ordinance establishing a Solid Waste Special Service District for the Council to consider f. Potential Community Reinvestment Areas (CRA) for wind or biomass energy projects in eastern Summit County g. Conservation financing effort for the Weber River watershed

Administration will also be involved in orientating the new Council member and facilitating the internal committee involved in the state legislative general session.

2. Community Development: In order to make more progress on initiatives that the Department has been working on for several years, such as updating the Snyderville Basin and Eastern Summit County General Plans, while at the same time responding to large development projects, such as Dakota Pacific/Tech Park and the Cedar Crest Village Overlay, the 2021 budget proposes unfreezing a currently frozen planner position and adding another planner FTE to the Department.

Additionally, in 2020, Community Development Department leadership, along with the County Manger and leadership from the County Council and the Planning Commissions will develop a work plan specific to Community Development with deliverables and timetables by the end of December so the County and the public will know what to expect from the Department for the next 2-3 years.

3. Economic Development: In 2021, economic development focus areas will be on the affordable and workforce housing program, specifically preparing the annual Moderate Income Housing Plan, and supporting the County’s newly formed Economic Development Advisory Board. The Department will also manage the Governor’s Office on Economic Development (GOED) Rural County Grant Program and continue to support the County’s COVID-19 relief and CDBG grants awarded in 2020.

4. Finance: Priorities for the Finance Department for 2021 are to complete the annual CAFR on time and complete the initial analysis needed to prepare for the Council going through Truth and Taxation in 2022. Finance will also continue to monitor the tourism economy revenues in the context of the

COVID-19 pandemic and the impact on current and future budgets, as well as issue RAP Tax Recreation bonds and work with Administration on the capital facilities bond.

5. Health Department: A great deal of resources from the County’s Health Department will continue to be dedicated to the COVID-19 pandemic response. Expected in 2021 is the management and implementation of mass vaccination efforts. Health Department leadership also plans to do 5-year succession planning for the entire Department.

Additionally, other divisions within the Health Department are proposing to complete the following initiatives:

a. Sustainability: Continue advancing the Council’s net 100% renewable energy goals and greenhouse gas emissions reduction goals b. Environmental Health: Permit private wells to protect water quality and continue efforts to monitor air quality and report data trends in PM2.5 and ozone concentrations c. Behavioral Health: Complete the 5-year community behavioral health assessment and update Summit County’s Mental Wellness Strategic Plan d. Nursing: Evaluate the Women’s Health Program and mechanisms of delivery

6. Information Technology Department: In 2021, the IT Department will focus on disaster recovery planning in response to an audit the Department of Homeland Security conducted on the County’s network, and cybersecurity education and training for employees. IT will also complete the process started in 2020, utilizing CARES Act dollars, to establish a wireless backhaul network to improve connectivity between county facilities.

7. Public Works: The work plan for Public Works involves completing several road projects, such as design of the trail connection on SR-32 between Marion and Kamas, Bitner/Silver Creek Connection, Old Ranch Road east/west segment (Phase 4A), as well as routine capital and road maintenance projects and the annual TST/corridor preservation project applications that are approved by the Council of Governments (COG). Public Works will also be focusing on stormwater public education and outreach and issuing an RFP for a new solid waste collections contract.

8. Transportation Planning: The big project for Transportation Planning in 2021 will be operationalizing the Snyderville Basin Transit District after deciding to separate from Park City Transit in 2020. Transportation Planning will also focus on completing the SR-224 Bus Rapid Transit NEPA process,

FTA required planning processes to allow for federal transit funding and continue to pursue federal transit grant opportunities.

See attached spreadsheet for full list of projects proposed for the 2021 Work Plan.

Council-Manager Compact For the past two years, the Council and County Manager have signed a compact (see attached) that commits the Council, Manager and Staff to the projects in the Work Plan, a process for revising the Work Plan, and outlines how everything will be communicated to the public. The purpose of the compact is:

• To have clear, well-defined, and achievable accomplishments for Summit County • To communicate expectations clearly to the community, down to the specific project level • To consider Staff resources and budget when committing to projects, work, and activities • To better align the budget to the County’s work • To focus on the projects/work that most significantly advance or set the foundation to advance the Council’s strategic priorities within the limits of the County’s resources • To plan more effectively for future (multi-year) tasks, projects, budget, and resources and • To facilitate the Council thinking and performing at a strategic, big- picture level, setting direction for the County and empowering Staff to figure out and implement the details

The compact makes it clear how the Council and Manager will make decisions around the projects included in the Work Plan and sets up a process for how to address new priorities that come up during the year after the Work Plan has been established, taking into consideration Staff capacity and budget.

The County Manager is proposing once again that the Council sign the compact, agreeing to the proposed Work Plan for 2021.

Council-Manager Compact for County Work Plan Summit County 2021 Fiscal Year [Adopted 12/09/2020]

The Summit County Council and County Manager agree that this compact outlines the County’s Fiscal Year 2021 Work Plan and how the Council, Manager, and Staff will share the responsibility for advancing the County’s strategic priorities. It also describes the Council’s and Manager’s respective roles and responsibilities in directing staff to work on special projects, and a commitment to considering Staff resources and County budget when revising the Work Plan.

RATIONALE FOR COMPACT • To have clear, well-defined and achievable accomplishments for Summit County. • To communicate expectations clearly to the community, down to the specific project level. • To consider Staff resources and budget when committing to projects, work, and activities. • To better align the budget to the County’s work. • To focus on the projects/work that most significantly advance or set the foundation to advance the Council’s strategic priorities within the limits of the County’s resources. • To more effectively plan for future (multi-year) tasks, projects, budget and resources and follow up on strategic priorities. • To facilitate the Council thinking and performing at a strategic, big-picture level, setting direction for the County and empowering Staff to figure out and implement the details.

JOINTLY DEVELOPED

The Council, Manager and Staff of Summit County partnered together to develop this Council- Manager compact for achievement. The Council set the strategic priorities, the Manager worked with Staff to add projects to advance each strategic priority, and Staff provided input on the types of support they needed and data on the capacity of their departments to complete special projects. All parties partnered together to define their roles and responsibilities and came to agreement on how decisions will be made regarding the Work Plan and how it is revised. The Council and Manager will review this compact annually and make suggested revisions based on an evaluation of the needs of the community and feedback received from Staff and the community.

For this compact to be successful, it is first important to understand the Council’s and Manager’s goals for achievement:

December 9, 2020 • Page 1 of 4

COUNCIL’S GOALS:

·Provide excellent, ethical and efficient services that ensure quality of life for present and future generations. ·Regional collaboration. ·Take action in a timely manner, meeting the needs of citizens. ·Preserve our air, water, land and culture. ·Show leadership, motivating others to collaboratively achieve goals. ·Stay focused on the tasks outlined in the Work Plan and be deliberate about new initiatives that may arise.

MANAGER’S GOALS:

·Recruit and retain talented employees with expertise within their given field. ·Avoid employee burnout. ·Have tangible, meaningful accomplishments that best serve the residents of Summit County. ·Avoid constant changes in direction to Staff and to the organization. ·Provide Staff with focus-specific tasks that can be achieved in a reasonable amount of time. ·Stay focused on the tasks outlined in the Work Plan and be deliberate about new initiatives that may arise.

To meet these goals, the Council and Manager will work together to: • Support Staff and lean on their expertise to facilitate tangible accomplishments. • Focus on priorities and communicate frequently. • Schedule Council work sessions to facilitate planning, discussion, and resources (budget and staff) around projects included in the Work Plan. • Align budget and Staff resources with expectations involving projects and workload. • Collaborate with Staff and the community on setting priorities and setting up the Work Plan.

The Council, Manager, and Staff commit to:

COUNCIL’s RESPONSIBILITIES:

(1) Think and perform at a strategic level, collaborating and giving direction to County Manager and Staff on projects to advance the Council’s strategic priorities; empowering Staff to figure out the implementation details. (2) Respect County Manager and Staff process without unilateral redirection by individual Council members. (3) Align the strategic priorities with the County budget. (4) Go to the Manager with requests that require Staff resources, rather than directly to Staff. (5) Before going to the Manager with a project request or work order, have a discussion on the issue with the full Council in a public meeting to confirm commitment of resources. (6) Initiate a joint conversation with the full Council and Manager, as priorities change or new ones arise, about any revisions to the Work Plan outside the annual review, so resources and budget can be evaluated and a decision made about which project to remove from the Work Plan to accommodate the new work.

December 9, 2020 • Page 2 of 4

MANGER’S RESPONSIBILITIES:

(1) Direct and monitor Staff on projects, process, and progress. (2) Help Staff figure out the “weeds” and implementation strategies as appropriate. (3) Respond to Council requests. (4) Communicate frequently with Council on progress made on projects and strategic priorities. (5) Address barriers and challenges with the Council and Staff as barriers and challenges surface, impacting progress made on projects and strategic priorities. (7) Engage in a joint conversation with the full Council, as priorities change or new ones arise, about any revisions to the Work Plan outside the annual review, so resources and budget can be evaluated and a decision made about which project to remove from the Work Plan to accommodate the new work. (6) Remove a project from the Work Plan if a decision is made to add a new priority or project outside of the annual review.

STAFF RESPONSIBILITIES: (1) Communicate to the Manager a change in capacity or resources that would impact progress made on agreed projects in the Work Plan. (2) Provide quarterly updates to the Council on actions completed on projects. (3) Communicate to the Manager progress made on projects and strategic priorities and any barriers or challenges encountered impacting that progress. (4) Inform the Manager of any requests received from the Council or community. (5) Help the Council and Manager communicate the Work Plan and progress made to the community. (6) Provide feedback to the Council and Manager at the annual review of this compact and the Work Plan.

COMMUNICATION ABOUT THE WORK PLAN: Council and Manager are committed to frequent two-way communication with each other, Staff and the community about the County’s strategic priorities and Work Plan. Some examples of how the parties will communicate are:

• Meetings • Emails • Strategic Plan portal/SharePoint sites • Public meetings • County website • Newsletter to employees and the community • Employee town halls • Social Media • Other

December 9, 2020 • Page 3 of 4

THE FISCAL YEAR 2021 WORK PLAN:

The County’s Strategic Priorities are: • Transportation and Congestion: The County will plan for and make improvements to our transportation and transit systems to reduce traffic congestion and to enhance multimodal mobility for residents, employees, and visitors. • Workforce Housing: The County will facilitate efforts to significantly decrease the deficit in workforce/affordable housing in order to have more community members who work and live in our County. • Environmental Stewardship: Through environmental stewardship and leadership, the County will implement plans and policies to protect and conserve our climate, water, land and air quality for the present and future. • Refine County General Plans and Development Codes: The County will review and refine the General Plans and Development Codes focusing on improving and connecting the region’s physical, natural, and economic environments and communities. • Mental Health/Substance Abuse Issues: The County, in collaboration with the Board of Health and the Summit County Mental Wellness Alliance, will promote community awareness of mental wellness and substance abuse issues, and increased access to effective treatment and prevention services and programs within Summit County.

Attachment: Fiscal Year 2021 Work Plan Project List

County Council Signatures:

______Date: ______Date: ______

______Date: ______

County Manager Signature:

______Date: ______

December 9, 2020 • Page 4 of 4

Summit County 2021 Work Plan

Level of Effort Budget Carry Over to Other Departments Involved in Priority by Council Strategic Priority Project Description Lead Department (Low, Medium, Requested? Subsequent Project Department High) (Y/N) Years? NOTE: By the end of 2020, Community Development will have developed and presented to the Council a two to three-year project Administration, Council, Planning plan that lays out deliverables and timetables to complete the CDD Medium N Y Commission Council and Planning Commission's priorities. This strategy will likely delay some items to 2022 or 2023.

Refiner GPs and Snyderville Basin General Plan Review/Update, includes response to Codes/Workforce Econ Development, Transit, SB39, Affordable Housing Amendments (requires more of a link CDD High N Y 1 Housing/Transportation & Sustainability, Legal between housing and transit in general plans) Congestion

Econ Development, Transit, Refine GPs Eastern Summit County General Plan Review/Update CDD High N Y 1 Sustainability, Legal Workforce Housing; Econ Development, Transit, Trans/Congestion; Env. Tech Park/Dakota Pacific Amendments CDD High N Y 1 Engineering, Sustainability, Legal Stewardship Workforce Housing; Econ Development, Transit, Trans/Congestion; Env. Development Permit Administration CDD High N Y 1 Engineering, Sustainability, Legal Stewardship

Legal, Econ Development, Transit, Refine GPs and Codes Planning Commission Training/Education CDD High N N 1 Sustainability, Engineering

Workforce Housing; Legal, Econ Development, Transit, Trans/Congestion; Env. Cedar Crest Village Overlay CDD High N Y 1 Sustainability Stewardship

Affordable & Workforce Housing Programs: Prepare annual Community Dev., Legal, IT, Facilities, Moderate Income Housing Plan; prepare housing agreements and Finance, Treasurer, Sustainability deed restrictions; monitor deed restricted units (as more units Outside: Mountain lands Community Workforce Housing & Refine come on line, this will become much more labor intensive for the Economic Housing Trust, Habitat for Humanity, County General Plans & Economic Development, Legal and Community Development Development/ High Y Y 1 Private Developers, State of Utah Development Codes Divisions), manage Bear Hollow deed restricted "buy back" Housing Department of Workforce Services program; Manage MCHT contract; participate and make and Mountainland Association of presentations at various housing workshops and trainings; continue Governments Governor's Council on Housing Affordability participation. Summit County 2021 Work Plan

N for YR 1, Support the County's Economic Development Advisory Board and but will manage the GOED Rural County Grant Program. To qualify for a Administration, IT, Legal, Finance, require a Rural County Grant, the County must form and have a functioning Economic County Council, Partnership Refine County General Plans & 40% match County Economic Development Advisory Board (CED Board) and Development/ Communities within Summit County, High N 1 Development Codes going must bring their economic development strategies current. This is Housing Private Businesses, GOED, Rural forward for important not only because of the grant requirements but to help Partnership Board. defined build back the post COVID-19 economy. projects.

COVID-19 and CDBG Grant Support. Due to the pandemic, the Mental Health/Substance Abuse Administration, Legal, IT, Finance, Economic Development Division has provided administrative issues. With the economy Economic Mountainlands Association of oversight and program design for both the CDBG and CARES shutdowns resulting from COVID- Development/ Governments, Partnership High N N 1 Business and Non-profit funding relief programs. It is anticipated 19, the collective mental health Housing Communities within Summit County, that additional Federal relief will be coming to Summit County in of the community was/is at risk. private and not for profit business. 2021.

Data Affiliate Services. The Economic and Housing Development Division provides data affiliate services in support of every strategic Y, but 50% of the Transportation & Congestion, priority including transportation, health, housing environmental budget is Refine County General Plans & services and updates to the County's General Plans and codes. Data Economic dependent upon Development Codes, Administration, Legal, IT, Finance, Park is also provided to external partners and to private and non-profit Development/ High Y the Chamber 1 Environmental Stewardship, City Chambers and Visitors Bureau. businesses. As we build back from the impacts of COVID-19, using Housing who have been Workforce Housing, Mental and understanding quality data is imperative. The data demands of terribly impacted Health/Substance Abuse issues our organization and communities continues to grow both by COVID-19 internally and externally.

Health Administration, Sheriff, Emergency *** COVID-19 Pandemic Response and Mass Vaccination Efforts High Y N 1 (Administration) Management Net 100% renewable energy for govt. operations by 2030 (includes Health Legal, Facilities, Finance, Partners, Environmental Stewardship Low NA Y 5 Districts) (Sustainability) Service Districts Health Legal, Finance, Municipalities, Environmental Stewardship Net 100% renewable energy available countywide by 2030 High Y Y 3 (Sustainability) Partners, 80% GHG emissions reduction by 2040 (County Operations): Analyze 2019 GHG emissions inventory; Conduct energy usage Health Environmental Stewardship Facilities, Fleet, Transit, Utilities High NA Y 9 analysis of operations & facilities: Use results to draft new strategic (Sustainability) plan. Permit private wells in an effort to correct issues with wastewater Health Community Development, Council, Environmental Stewardship High N Y 4 setbacks and protect water quality (Environmental) Legal Summit County 2021 Work Plan

Maintain air quality monitoring in Summit County and actively Health Environmental Stewardship Sustainability Medium N Y 10 report data trends in PM2.5 and Ozone concentrations. (Environmental)

Mental Health/ Substance Abuse Implementation and completion of 5 year community behavioral SCSO, SCAO, Utah Courts, Early Health (Behavioral) High Y N 2 Issues health assessment. Intervention, and Community Partners

Mental Health/ Substance Abuse Update of Summit County Mental Wellness Strategic Plan for SCSO, SCAO, Utah Courts, Early Health (Behavioral) High Y N 6 Issues approval by County Council Intervention, and Community Partners

Stormwater: Develop Public Education and Outreach. A major Public Works Legal, Communications and Public Environmental Stewardship Medium Y Y 1 component of the County's SWP Permit. (Engineering) Engagement Public Works Transportation and Congestion 2021 capital and road maintenance projects Medium Y N 2 (Engineering) Public Works SR-32 Marion to Kamas Design completion Medium Y Y 3 (Engineering) Bitner/Silver Creek Connection (Complete Public Information, Public Works Transportation and Congestion Manager, Council High Y Y 4 Environmental, Property, Begin Construction) (Engineering) Public Works Transportation and Congestion Old Ranch Road, East/West Segment, Phase 4A Manager, Council High Y Y 5 (Engineering) Transportation and Congestion TST/Corridor Preservation Project Applications (COG) Public Works Transit/Transportation Medium Y Y 1 Public Works (Solid Environmental Stewardship Collections Contract, Managing RFP Process Administration High N Y 1 Waste) Public Works (Solid Environmental Stewardship Advancing solid waste master plan - Leachate Management Medium Y Y 2 Waste) Public Works (Solid Environmental Stewardship Advancing solid waste master plan - Posi Shell Daily Cover Medium Y Y 3 Waste)

Operationalize the Snyderville Basin Transit District - Separate from Public works, Engineering, Planning, Transportation and Congestion Transportation High Y Y 1 Park City Transit - Pursue regional transit with other organizations Council, Admin, Legal, Finance

Public works, Engineering, Planning, Transportation and Congestion Complete SR-224 BRT NEPA process Transportation High Y Y 2 Council, Admin, Legal, Finance Complete FTA required planning processes to allow for federal Public works, Engineering, Planning, Transportation and Congestion Transportation High Y N 3 transit funding Council, Admin, Legal, Finance Public works, Engineering, Planning, Transportation and Congestion Continue to pursue federal transit grants Transportation High Y Y 4 Council, Admin, Legal, Finance Transportation/ Transportation and Congestion Design for Kimball Junction and SR-224 (UDOT-led project) UDOT Low NA Y 5 UDOT Public works, Engineering, Planning, Transportation and Congestion Central Wasatch Commission - Mountain Transportation System Transportation low N N 6 Council, Admin, Legal, Finance Summit County 2021 Work Plan

Other Prioritized Projects Proposed for 2021 that Don't Fall Directly Under a Strategic Priority Level of Effort Budget Carry Over to Other Departments Involved in Priority by Project Description Lead Department (Low, Medium, Requested? Subsequent Project Department High) (Y/N) Years? Onboarding and orientation of new Council member Administration All Medium N N 1 Council Strategic Planning: Maintain current priorities but update Council, CDD, Econ Development, some of the strategic effects. Delay community survey and Administration Medium N Y 2 Health, Public Works, Transportation thorough planning process for the 2022-2024 time period Elected offices, Council, Legal, High (when in General and interim legislative sessions and UAC participation Administration Finance, CDD, SO, Economic N Y 3 session) Development, Transportation, Health Capital Facilities Bond: 2021: Bond issue, procure consulting assistance, master planning of property, development of PW projects, planning approval Administration/ Facilities, Legal, Council, Public Works, applications Medium Y N 4 Finance Planning 2022: Implement PW projects, develop master planned projects and resulting remodels 2023-2025: Complete projects and office moves RAP Tax bond projects (Finance will lead the charge of issuing the Administration/CPE Finance High Y Y 5 bond) Ordinance for Solid Waste Special Service District Administration/PW Legal, Finance High N Y 6 EMS System - analysis of operations and service delivery in Personnel, Legal, Council, COG, EMS response to concerns expressed by east-side mayors; work with Administration Medium to High N Possibly 7 Board, Fire Chiefs EMS board and COG on a solution Mastering Planning Marion Park - work with citizen group Administration Public Works (landfill), Council Medium Y Y 8 Planning, Council, Economic Open space acquisitions Administration Medium Y Y 9 Development, Finance Economic Development, Legal, Potential Community Reinvestment Areas (CRA) - Eastern Summit Administration/ Finance, Assessor, Community High N N 10 County (Wind Farm and/or Biomass Energy Projects) Legal Development, County Council Mountain Regional Water, Basin Weber River Watershed Conservation Financing Project Administration Recreation, USFS, State DNR, Fire Low N Y 11 Warden, Council, Finance Economic GOED/edcUTAH Programs - ongoing business attraction efforts Community Development, Legal, Development/ High N Yes 5 responding to RFIs Finance Housing

Complete annual CAFR on time Finance Third-party auditors High Y N 1 Summit County 2021 Work Plan

Truth and Taxation: Complete initial analysis in 2021 during the 2022 budget process to prepare for going through Truth and Finance Council, Admin Medium NA N 2 Taxation for all funds in 2022 Monitor tourism economy revenues in the context of the COVID-19 Finance Economic Development Medium NA Y 3 pandemic and the impact on current and future budgets Issue RAP Tax Bonds (Admin will manage the call for and review of Finance Admin Medium Y N 4 projects) 5-year Succession Planning for the Health Department Health Personnel, Administration Medium N Y 7 Evaluate Women's Health Program and Mechanisms of Delivery Health Finance, Administration, Legal Medium N Y 8 Disaster Recovery Planning - Develop a document business continuity plan for Summit County IT. Is a vital component of NIST Information Information Technology Medium Y Y 1 framework, as demonstrated in a Dept. of Homeland Security Technology Assessment Wireless backhaul network - System purchased with CARES Act money. Utilize the system for network improvements between Information Facilities, Public Works Medium N N 2 county facilities. Would also play a role in business continuity Technology plans. Cybersecurity education - Develop training plans for employees that Information Risk Management Low Y Y 3 makes security an automatic response for potential incidents. Technology Strategic Plan for IT - Document plan with input from stakeholders. Information All High Y Y 4 Goals include stability, security, and accessibility Technology GIS Recorder - Work with County Recorder to bring new person in Information Recorder Medium Y Y 5 to work with both offices. Technology Public Works Complete Engineering Code Revisions Public Works, Planning, Legal Medium N N 2 (Engineering) Prioritized Projects Postponed to Future Work Plans Level of Effort Will Budget Carry Over to Other Departments Involved in Project Description Lead Department (Low, Medium, be Needed? Subsequent Project High) (Y/N) Years? Community survey and strategic planning for the years 2022-2024 Administration Council High Y N

Project ABC - Annual Economic Impact Analysis (Note: This sector Economic has been decimated by COVID-19. As such, staff would recommend Development/ Admin (Special Events), Arts Council Medium N Y offering more support to these partners and industries. Housing

Truth and Taxation for all funds in 2022 Finance Admin, Council Medium N N Convert 50% of County's passenger vehicle fleet to alternative fuel, Health Facilities, Fleet, Finance Medium Y Y hybrid, electric vehicles (Sustainability) Health (Health Health in All Policies Discussion Personnel, Council, Administration High N Y Promotion) Summit County 2021 Work Plan

Kamas Park and Ride Improvement Project Public Works Transit/Transportation Medium Y N

Memorandum:

Date: December 9, 2020 To: Council Members From: Nancy Hooton Re: Snyderville Basin Planning Commission

Appoint one member to serve the unexpired term of Malena Stevens on the Snyderville Basin Planning Commission. Term of service to expire February 28, 2022.

Council interviewed the following applicants on December 2, 2020:

Tony Taylor Chris Conabee Dave McFawn Laurel Simpson

Proclamation No. 2020-13 PROCLAMATION RECOGNIZING Kim Carson FOR 8 YEARS OF SERVICE ON THE SUMMIT COUNTY COUNCIL SUMMIT COUNTY, UTAH

Whereas, Kim Carson was born and raised in Dayton, Ohio and graduated Cum Laude from the University of Utah with a degree in Organizational Communications after transferring there from the Ohio University; and

Whereas, Kim met her partner, Bob Carson, through mutual friends while finishing her degree at the University of Utah and married him in 1986 in Salt Lake City; and

Whereas, Kim and Bob made Summit County their home over 30 years ago and raised their two children here, Jenny Louise Carson, now a pediatric hospice nurse in Denver, Colorado, and Robert Scott Carson (Scott), lead programmer for a small bio mechanical engineering company also in Denver, Colorado; and

Whereas, Kim was sworn in as a member of the Summit County Council in 2013 after serving two terms on the Park City Board of Education, and four years as Board President; and

Whereas, prior to joining the Summit County Council, Kim spent a career in corporate sales and training, which took her all over the state, and served as Executive Director of the Park City Education Foundation; and

Whereas, only one year into her first term, Kim was diagnosed with triple negative Breast Cancer and was out front with the diagnosis and treatment, continuing to serve Summit County; and

Whereas, as a County Councilmember, Kim served on many boards and commissions, including the Utah Association of Counties (UAC) Board of Directors, Public Lands/Wilderness Advisory Group, Summit County Board of Health, Mountainland Association of Governments (MAG) Executive Council, Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Ratings and Rankings Committee, Summit County Mental Wellness Alliance, Joint Transit Advisory Board (JTAB), Snyderville Basin Special Recreation District Advisory Committee, and the state’s prestigious Third Judicial District Nominating Commission; and

Whereas, Kim’s leadership in representing the Council on these boards and commissions has been a mainstay of her tenure as a Council member, particularly her role on the Board of Health and as the driving force for shaping critical relationships with external partners, such as UAC, the state legislature, and MAG; and

Whereas, during her eight years on the Council, Kim has made countless contributions to the Summit County Community, including working on the animal control code and County’s leash laws, spearheading the monumental stakeholder and consensus building effort to develop a proposal for Congressman Rob Bishop’s Public Lands Initiative (PLI), and establishing a working group with members from the state, Morgan County, and Summit County to address safety and recreation on the Weber River; and Whereas, some of public policy issues and areas on which Kim focused her time and attention were mental and behavioral health; Drug Court and the participants whose stories she took to heart and celebrated at their graduation; open space, recreation and trails that make Summit County the beautiful place it is to live, work and play; public health and the professionals in this Department long before the COVID-19 pandemic; and the state legislature with weekly trips to the Capitol when in session to find common ground with lawmakers and lobby on behalf of the County; and

Whereas, Kim exhibited a true love for learning about all the things that happen in the County from water to waste, roads to weeds, agriculture, rodeos and demolition derbies, and most importantly, the County employees and volunteers that work in these areas and contribute so much to the place we all live; and

Whereas, Kim has been the conscience of the Council, keeping everyone straight on the details of government, and as Council Chair, set the standard for running thorough and efficient meetings, artfully balancing the needs of the public, staff time, and Council deliberations; and

Whereas, as she leaves the Council, Kim’s colleagues and Summit County staff will remember her as a calming voice in the midst of conflict and controversy, as the Council member who was always thoroughly prepared for everything, a fierce advocate for women in the workplace and in political and appointed office, the leader who remembered everyone’s birthday and special life events, and always thanked/recognized the staff for their hard work and accomplishments; and

Whereas, Kim has expressed that it is the variety of people and what they bring to this place she has chosen to live for the last 33 years of which she is most proud and the opportunity elected office afforded her to meet them all – east county, west county, Kamas, Coalville, Park City, where folks were from did not matter to Kim; it was more about where they were going and how they contributed to the place they live, their families and their history; and

Whereas, Kim cares very little about holding a position of power but she cares very much about treating all people with respect and truly listening to them, holding these beliefs as much today as when she was first elected eight years ago; and

Now, therefore, be it resolved that the Summit County Council does hereby recognize Kim Carson for her eight years of service on the Summit County Council, and thanks her for her tireless efforts to improve the health, safety and welfare of the community, and celebrates her commitment to making Summit County an all-around better place for those who live and visit here.

APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of December 2020. SUMMIT COUNTY COUNCIL

______Doug Clyde, Chair Christopher Robinson

______Glenn Wright, Vice Chair Roger Armstrong

______Kent Jones, Clerk

RESOLUTION NSFSD 2020-25

A BUDGET RESOLUTION OF THE NORTH SUMMIT FIRE SERVICE DISTRICT 2020 BUDGET AMENDMENTS 2021 BUDGETS

WHEREAS, pursuant to UCA §17B-1-622, on December 2,2020 the Summit County Council, acting as the governing body of the North Summit Fire Service District, held a public hearing to amend the following 2020 budgets: Operating Fund, Capital Fund, and Debt Service Fund; and,

WHEREAS, pursuant to UCA §17B-1-610, on December 2,2020 the Summit County Council, acting as the governing body of the North Summit Fire Service District, held a public hearing for the following 2020 budgets: Operating Fund, Capital Fund, and Debt Service Fund; and,

WHEREAS, the Summit County Council, acting as the governing body of the North Summit Fire Service District, finds that it is in the best interests of the District to amend the 2020 budgets and adopt the 2021 budgets of the following: Operating Fund, Capital Fund, and Debt Service Fund;

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, pursuant to UCA §17B-1-614, the Summit County Council, acting as the governing body of the North Summit Fire Service District, hereby amends the 2020 budgets and further adopts the 2021 budgets, as shown herein:

2020

2020 Amended Operating Budget Revenue: $529,068 Expense: $385,952 Change in Net Position: $143,116

2020 Amended Capital Budget: $60,809

2020 Amended Debt Service Budget: $33,841

2021

2021 Operating Budget Revenue: $549,400

Expense: $400,025

Change in Net Position: $149,375

2021 Capital Budget: $300,000

2021 Debt Service Budget: $00.00

APPROVED, ADOPTED, AND PASSED and ordered published by the Summit County Council, this 2nd day of December, 2020

NORTH SUMMIT FIRE SERVICE DISTRICT SUMMIT COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH

ATTEST:

By: ______Doug Clyde ______Chair, Governing Body Kent Jones County Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

______David L. Thomas Chief Civil Deputy

RESOLUTION NSRSSD 2020-29

A BUDGET RESOLUTION OF THE NORTH SUMMIT RECREATION SPECIAL SERVICE DISTRICT 2020 BUDGET AMENDMENTS 2021 BUDGETS

WHEREAS, pursuant to UCA §17B-1-622, on December 2nd, 2020, the Summit County Council, acting as the governing body of the North Summit Recreation Special Service District, held a public hearing to amend the following 2019 budgets: Operating Fund, Capital Fund, and Debt Service Fund; and,

WHEREAS, pursuant to UCA §17B-1-610, on December 2nd, 2020, the Summit County Council, acting as the governing body of the North Summit Recreation Special Service District, held a public hearing for the following 2020 budgets: Operating Fund, Capital Fund, and Debt Service Fund; and,

WHEREAS, the Summit County Council, acting as the governing body of the North Summit Recreation Special Service District, finds that it is in the best interests of the District to amend the 2020 budgets and adopt the 2021 budgets of the following: Operating Fund, Capital Fund, and Debt Service Fund;

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, pursuant to UCA §17B-1-614, the Summit County Council, acting as the governing body of the North Summit Recreation Special Service District, hereby amends the 2020 budgets and further adopts the 2021 budgets, as shown herein:

2020

2020 Amended Operating Budget Revenue: $108,300 Expense: $75,444 Change in Net Position: $32,855

2020 Amended Capital Budget $0

2020 Amended Debt Service Budget $72,000

2021 2021 Operating Budget Revenue: $143,511 Expense: $121,092 Change in Net Position: $22,419

2021 Capital Budget $0

2020 Debt Service Budget $32,150

APPROVED, ADOPTED, AND PASSED and ordered published by the Summit County Council, this 2nd day of December, 2020

North Summit Recreation Special Service District SUMMIT COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH

ATTEST:

By: ______Doug Clyde Chair, Governing Body

______Kent Jones County Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

______David L. Thomas Chief Civil Deputy

2021 Operating Budget

2021 North Summit Special Recreation District (NSSRD) Budget Overview The 2021 budget was created using current operational plans and actual historical results of operations. The overall goal is to use taxes, reasonable registration fees, and other funds in a fiscally appropriate way to improve program offerings to the community. COVID has affected the 2020 program. In 2021 will look forward to being a great community partner!

The 2021 budget ends with a Net Income of $22,419 for the year. Debt Payments A loan was taken out for 2020 operations from Summit County in anticipation of property tax revenue in December 2020 for repayment. Since NSSRD will be receiving the tax revenue in 2021, the loan will be moved to a three‐year repayment with an additional advance in January of $20,000 for 2021 operations. Repayment of the loan will occur in 3 years, and details can be reviewed in Schedule B. Participant Registration Fees The benefits we provide and the cost for family members is a delicate balance for the board. We want as many of the families who wish to participate in the opportunity to do so. NSSRD has fees much lower than our surrounding communities.

Most of the currently offered programs operate at a loss. Property taxes subsidize programs that are operating at a loss due to low registration fees. Baseball/Softball and Basketball operate with a higher subsidy than other sports. You can review details for the sports program on Schedule E.

In 2021, Baseball is the only sport that will have a minimal increase. It will increase by $5 for each of the two age groups. Grades P to 4th will be $55, and Grades 5th to 8th will be $75.

Consideration of financial impacts on families is front of mind to the board; however, if fee increases happen, know it would be after careful consideration. Thank you in advance for your support.

We will also be offering scholarships for those families in financial distress so their athletes can participate. The annual total of all scholarships is $5,000 and will be allocated out to each program. New Programs Gymkhana Horse Club will be a new program that will enhance our community involvement. Currently, the closest program is in Evanston, and many individuals from the North Summit area are involved in it. We believe we can recruit others from surrounding communities as well. There will be an increase in expenses to help get this program started in 2021. Conclusion We appreciate the support from both the county and community in helping to improve the North Summit Special Recreation District. As we look forward past 2020 and enter 2021, we anticipate a great sports year! We are expecting many athletes to enhance their skills and experience through continually improving programs!

Thank you! 2021 Income Statement Budget

Jan-21 Feb-21 Mar-21 Apr-21 May-21 Jun-21 Jul-21 Aug-21 Sep-21 Oct-21 Nov-21 Dec-21 Total

Section I: Recreation Program Income and Expenses

Recreation Programs Income Registration Income $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 2,000 $ 4,500 $ 13,596 $ 1,583 $ 4,083 $ 5,804 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 6,944 $ 38,511 Less: Scholarships $ ‐ $ ‐ $ (260) $ (584) $ (1,765) $ (206) $ (530) $ (754) $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ (902) $ (5,000) Net Registration Income: $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 1,740 $ 3,916 $ 11,831 $ 1,378 $ 3,553 $ 5,050 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 6,042 $ 33,511

Recreation Program Expenses Sub Contractors Officials and Referees $ 2,667 $ 2,667 $ ‐ $ 525 $ 4,650 $ 4,125 $ ‐ $ 1,463 $ 1,463 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 2,667 $ 20,225 Director $ ‐ $ 1,600 $ ‐ $ 1,000 $ 1,000 $ 2,000 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 4,000 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 9,600 Assistant Director $ ‐ $ 4,000 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 4,000 Total Subcontractor: $ 2,667 $ 8,267 $ - $ 1,525 5,650$ $ 6,125 $ - $ 1,463 $ 5,463 $ - $ - $ 2,667 $ 33,825

Other Expenses Uniforms $ ‐ $ 735 $ 2,700 $ 5,775 $ ‐ $ 250 $ 1,869 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 2,080 $ ‐ $ 13,409 Registration Transaction Fees$ 98 $ 98 $ 156 $ 229 $ 493 $ 144 $ 217 $ 267 $ 98 $ 98 $ 98 $ 300 $ 2,296 Sportsman Registration Software$ 219 $ 219 $ 219 $ 219 $ 219 $ 219 $ 219 $ 219 $ 219 $ 219 $ 219 $ 219 $ 2,625 New Program Development $ 833 $ 833 $ 833 $ 833 $ 833 $ 833 $ 833 $ 833 $ 833 $ 833 $ 833 $ 833 $ 10,000 Program Misc. Expense $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 150 $ 150 $ 6,500 $ ‐ $ 150 $ 150 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 900 $ 8,000 Total Other Expenses:$ 1,150 $ 1,885 $ 4,058 $ 7,206 $ 8,045 $ 1,446 $ 3,287 $ 1,469 $ 1,150 $ 1,150 $ 3,230 $ 2,252 $ 36,330 Total Recreation Program Expenses: $ 3,817 $ 10,152 $ 4,058 $ 8,731 $ 13,695 $ 7,571 $ 3,287 $ 2,931 $ 6,613 $ 1,150 $ 3,230 $ 4,918 $ 70,155

Rec Program Net Income/Loss: $ (3,817) $ (10,152) $ (2,318) $ (4,815) $ (1,864) $ (6,193) $ 266 $ 2,119 $ (6,613) $ (1,150) $ (3,230) $ 1,124 $ (36,644) 2021 Income Statement Budget

Jan-21 Feb-21 Mar-21 Apr-21 May-21 Jun-21 Jul-21 Aug-21 Sep-21 Oct-21 Nov-21 Dec-21 Total

Section II: Non Sports Program Revenue and Administrative Expenses

Income Property Taxes $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 100,000 $ ‐ $ 100,000 County Grant $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 10,000 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 10,000 Interest Income $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ Non Program Income: $ - $ - $ - -$ -$ -$ -$ $ - $ 10,000 $ - $ 100,000 $ - $ 110,000 Administration Expenses

Compensation General Manager 1,500$ $ 1,500 $ 1,500 $ 1,500 $ 1,500 $ 1,500 $ 1,500 $ 1,530 $ 1,530 $ 1,530 $ 1,530 $ 1,530 $ 18,150 Participation Incentive $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 26 $ 58 $ 177 $ 21 $ 53 $ 75 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 90 $ 500 FICA/Medicare $ 115 $ 115 $ 115 $ 115 $ 115 $ 115 $ 115 $ 117 $ 117 $ 117 $ 117 $ 117 $ 1,388 Total Compensation:$ 1,615 $ 1,615 $ 1,641 $ 1,673 $ 1,791 $ 1,635 $ 1,668 $ 1,722 $ 1,647 $ 1,647 $ 1,647 $ 1,737 $ 20,038

Other Administrative Expenses Bank Charges $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ Depreciation Expenses$ 917 $ 917 $ 917 $ 917 $ 917 $ 917 $ 917 $ 917 $ 917 $ 917 $ 917 $ 917 $ 11,000 Office Supplies$ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 600 Professional Services $ 1,267 $ 1,267 $ 1,267 $ 1,346 $ 1,267 $ 1,267 $ 1,267 $ 1,267 $ 1,267 $ 1,267 $ 1,267 $ 1,267 $ 15,279 Phone Services $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 50 $ 600 Interest Expense $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 2,020 $ 2,020 Misc. $ 100 $ 244 $ 100 $ 100 $ 100 $ 100 $ 100 $ 155 $ 100 $ 100 $ 100 $ 100 $ 1,399 Total Other Administrative Expenses:$ 2,383 $ 2,527 $ 2,383 $ 2,462 $ 2,383 $ 2,383 $ 2,383 $ 2,438 $ 2,383 $ 2,383 $ 2,383 $ 4,404 $ 30,898 Total Administrative Expenses:$ 3,998 $ 4,142 $ 4,024 $ 4,136 $ 4,175 $ 4,019 $ 4,051 $ 4,161 $ 4,030 $ 4,030 $ 4,030 $ 6,141 $ 50,937

Administrative Net Income/Loss: $ (3,998) $ (4,142) $ (4,024) $ (4,136) $ (4,175) $ (4,019) $ (4,051) $ (4,161) $ 5,970 $ (4,030) $ 95,970 (6,141)$ $ 59,063

Monthly Net Income:$ (7,815) $ (14,294) $ (6,342) $ (8,951) $ (6,038) $ (10,212) $ (3,785) $ (2,042) $ (643) $ (5,181) $ 92,739 (5,017)$ $ 22,419 Year To Date Net Income:$ (7,815) $ (22,109) $ (28,451) $ (37,402) $ (43,440) $ (53,652) $ (57,438) $ (59,479) $ (60,123) $ (65,303) $ 27,436 $ 22,419 Budget Comparison

Budget Actual Budget Budget Dec-20 Sep-20 Dec-21 Changes

Section I: Recreation Program Income and Expenses

Recreation Programs Income Registration Income $ 30,000 $ 8,850 $ 38,511 $ 8,511 Less: Scholarships $ (5,000) $ ‐ $ (5,000) $ ‐ Net Registration Income:$ 25,000 $ 8,850 $ 33,511 $ 8,511

Recreation Program Expenses Sub Contractors Officials and Referees $ 1,703 $ 2,915 $ 20,225 $ 18,522 Director $ 5,259 $ 800 $ 9,600 $ 4,341 Assistant Director $ 7,038 $ 1,507 $ 4,000 $ (3,038) Total Subcontractor: $ 14,000 $ 5,222 $ 33,825 $ 19,825

Other Expenses Uniforms $ 10,000 $ 2,532 $ 13,409 $ 3,409 Registration Transaction Fees $ 6,262 $ 1,271 $ 2,296 $ (3,966) Sportsman Registration Software $ 2,625 $ 2,375 $ 2,625 $ ‐ New Program Development $ 5,000 $ 177 $ 10,000 $ 5,000 Program Misc. Expense $ ‐ $ (292) $ 8,000 $ 8,000 Total Other Expenses: $ 23,886 $ 6,063 $ 36,330 $ 12,443 Total Recreation Program Expenses: $ 37,886 $ 11,285 $ 70,155 $ 32,268

Rec Program Net Income/Loss: $ (12,886) $ (2,435) $ (36,644) $ (23,758)

Section II: Non Sports Program Revenue and Administrative Expenses

Income Property Taxes $ 80,000 $ ‐ $ 100,000 $ 20,000 County Grant $ ‐ $ 15,000 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 Interest Income $ 3,300 $ 623 $ ‐ $ (3,300) Non Program Income: $ 83,300 $ 15,623 $ 110,000 $ 26,700 Administration Expenses

Compensation General Manager $ 18,000 $ 10,500 $ 18,150 $ 150 Staff Wages $ 2,000 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ (2,000) Participation Incentive $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 500 $ 500 FICA/Medicare $ 1,377 $ 828 $ 1,388 $ 11 Total Compensation:$ 21,377 $ 11,328 $ 20,038 $ (1,339)

Other Administrative Expenses Bank Charges $ 36 $ 24 $ ‐ $ (36) Depreciation Expenses $ 2,068 $ ‐ $ 11,000 $ 8,932 Office Supplies $ 500 $ 48 $ 600 $ 100 Professional Services $ 3,000 $ 3,923 $ 15,279 $ 12,279 Phone Services $ 578 $ 384 $ 600 $ 23 Interest Expense $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 2,020 $ 2,020 Misc. $ 10,000 $ 1,265 $ 1,399 $ (8,601) Total Other Administrative Expenses:$ 16,181 $ 5,644 $ 30,898 $ 14,717 Total Administrative Expenses:$ 37,558 $ 16,972 $ 50,937 $ 13,378

Administrative Net Income/Loss: $ 45,742 $ (1,349) $ 59,063 $ 13,322

Annual Net Income$ 32,855 $ (3,784) $ 22,419 $ (10,436) Schedule A

Professional Services

Jan-21 Feb-21 Mar-21 Apr-21 May-21 Jun-21 Jul-21 Aug-21 Sep-21 Oct-21 Nov-21 Dec-21 Total Accounting 333$ 333$ 333$ 333$ 333$ 333$ 333$ 333$ 333$ 333$ 333$ 333$ 4,000$ Marketing 100$ 100$ 100$ 100$ 100$ 100$ 100$ 100$ 100$ 100$ 100$ 100$ 1,200$ Utah Local Governments Trust 267$ 267$ 267$ 267$ 267$ 267$ 267$ 267$ 267$ 267$ 267$ 267$ 3,200$ Web Development 150$ 150$ 150$ 150$ 150$ 150$ 150$ 150$ 150$ 150$ 150$ 150$ 1,800$ Grant Writing 417$ 417$ 417$ 417$ 417$ 417$ 417$ 417$ 417$ 417$ 417$ 417$ 5,000$ URL Registration $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ 79$ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ 79$ Total: 1,267$ 1,267$ 1,267$ 1,346$ 1,267$ 1,267$ 1,267$ 1,267$ 1,267$ 1,267$ 1,267$ 1,267$ 15,279$

Misc.

Jan-21 Feb-21 Mar-21 Apr-21 May-21 Jun-21 Jul-21 Aug-21 Sep-21 Oct-21 Nov-21 Dec-21 Total Post Office Box $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ 55$ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ 55$ Microsoft Office $ ‐ 144$ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ 144$ General stuff 100$ 100$ 100$ 100$ 100$ 100$ 100$ 100$ 100$ 100$ 100$ 100$ 1,200$ Total: 100$ 244$ 100$ 100$ 100$ 100$ 100$ 155$ 100$ 100$ 100$ 100$ 1,399$

Registration Transaction Fees

Jan-21 Feb-21 Mar-21 Apr-21 May-21 Jun-21 Jul-21 Aug-21 Sep-21 Oct-21 Nov-21 Dec-21 Total Monthly Minimum Fees 98$ 98$ 98$ 98$ 98$ 98$ 98$ 98$ 98$ 98$ 98$ 98$ 1,179$ Extra Registration Fees $ ‐ $ ‐ 58$ 130$ 394$ 46$ 118$ 168$ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ 201$ 1,117$ Total: 98$ 98$ 156$ 229$ 493$ 144$ 217$ 267$ 98$ 98$ 98$ 300$ 2,296$ Schedule B: County Loan Re‐Payment Amortization 2021 Budget

New Outstanding Date Loan Payment Rate Term Interest Principle Balances

2021 County Loan 1/31/2021 92,000$ 2.40% 3 $ 92,000 12/31/2021 32,150$ 2,020$ 30,130$ $ 61,870 12/31/2022 32,150$ 1,485$ 30,665$ $ 31,205 12/31/2023 31,953$ 749$ 31,204$ $ 0 Schedule C: Cash Flow Projection

Jan‐21 Feb‐21 Mar‐21 Apr‐21 May‐21 Jun‐21 Jul‐21 Aug‐21 Sep‐21 Oct‐21 Nov‐21 Dec‐21 Revenue $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 1,740 $ 3,916 $ 11,831 $ 1,378 $ 3,553 $ 5,050 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 6,042 Expenses less Depreciation$ 6,898 $ 13,377 $ 7,166 $ 11,950 $ 16,953 $ 10,673 $ 6,422 $ 6,175 $ 9,727 $ 4,264 $ 6,344 $ 10,143 Beacon Hill Grant $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ County Grant $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 10,000 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ Property Tax Revenue $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 100,000 Loan Repayment $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ 32,150 Loan $ 20,000 $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐ $ ‐

New Balance $ 66,547 $ 53,170 $ 47,744 $ 39,711 $ 34,589 $ 25,293 $ 22,425 $ 21,300 $ 21,573 $ 17,309 $ 10,965 $ 74,714 Schedule D: Registration Fees

Expected Months Registration Sport Beginning Ending Fees

Volleyball March March All Ages: $ 40

Flag Football April May All Ages $ 50

Baseball May June Grades P‐45$ 5 Grades 5‐87$ 5

Equestrian: Gymkhana Horse Club May August Per Day $ 30

Tackle Football July September All Ages:$ 100

Soccer August September Grades P‐43$ 5 Grades 5‐84$ 0

Basketball December February Grades P‐44$ 0 Grades 5‐85$ 0 Schedule E: Athlete Registration Subsidy Summary 2021 Budget

Per Athlete Sport Athletes Registration Fees Program Expenses Program Subsidy Volleyball 50$ 40.00 $ 37.70 $ ‐ Equestrian: Gymkhana Horse Club 64 $ 74.22 $ 105.47 $ (31.25) Flag Football 90 $ 50.00 $ 54.44 $ (4.44) Baseball 220 $ 61.80 $ 76.25 $ (14.45) Football 25 $ 100.00 $ 144.00 $ (44.00) Soccer 115 $ 36.70 $ 41.25 $ (4.55) Basketball 160 $ 43.40 $ 103.63 $ (60.23)

Note: Subsidies from property taxes allow registration fees to remain lower than similar programs in other communities. Sport Profitability Volleyball March

Age Group(s) # of Participants Reg Fee Total

All Ages: 50 $ 40 $ 2,000

Total 50 $ 40.00 $ 2,000

Expenses

Jersey Jersey Cost Total Pay Jersey $ 14.70 $ 735

Officiating # of Games # of Refs Per Game Pay Ref Costs Adult Referees 0 2$ 20.00 $ ‐ Youth Referees 0 2$ 10.00 $ ‐ Total Cost $ ‐

Sport Directors # of People Season Pay Total Pay Director Season Pay 1$ 1,000 $ 1,000 Assistants 0$ 250 $ ‐ Other 0$ 250 $ ‐ Total Cost$ 1,000 Misc. Expenses Type Cost Misc $ 150 $ ‐ Total Cost $ 150

Total Expenses$ 1,885

Per Participant Income $ 40 Per Participant Expense $ 38 Subsidy per Athlete $ ‐ Sport Net Income $ 115 Sport Profitability Equestrian: Gymkhana Horse Club May to August

Age Group(s) # of Participants Reg Fee Weekends Total

Lead Line 6 $ 30.00 5 $ 900 Walk Trot 8 $ 15.00 5 $ 600 Pee‐Wee 8 $ 15.00 5 $ 600 Junior 8 $ 15.00 5 $ 600 Adult 8 $ 15.00 5 $ 600 Classic 6 $ 15.00 5 $ 450 Memberships 20.00 $ 50 1 $ 1,000 Total 64 $ 74.22 $ 4,750

Expenses

Jersey Jersey Cost Total Pay Jersey $ ‐ $ ‐

Officiating # of Games # of Refs Per Game Pay Ref Costs Adult Referees 0 2 $ ‐ $ ‐ Youth Referees 0 2 $ ‐ $ ‐ Total Cost $ ‐

Sport Directors # of People Season Pay Total Pay Director Season Pay 1$ 1,000 $ 1,000 Assistants 0$ 250 $ ‐ Other 0$ 250 $ ‐ Total Cost$ 1,000 Misc. Expenses Type Cost Barrels 3 $ 150 Vertical Poles 6 $ 200 Timer System 1 $ 400 Arena Rental $ 500 Misc. $ 700 Insurance $ 800 Year‐end awards $ 3,000 Total Cost $ 5,750

Total Expenses$ 6,750

Per Participant Income $ 74 Per Participant Expense $ 105 Subsidy per Athlete$ 31 Sport Net Income $ (2,000) Sport Profitability Flag Football April‐May

Age Group(s) # of Participants Reg Fee Total All Ages 90 $ 50 $ 4,500

Total 90 $ 50.00 $ 4,500

Expenses

Jersey Jersey Cost Total Pay Jersey $ 30.00 $ 2,700

Officiating # of Games # of Refs Per Game Pay Ref Costs Adult Referees 30 1$ 20.00 $ 600 Youth Referees 30 1$ 15.00 $ 450 Total Cost $ 1,050

Sport Directors # of People Season Pay Total Pay Director Season Pay 1$ 1,000 $ 1,000 Assistants 0$ 400 $ ‐ Other 0$ 250 $ ‐ Total Cost$ 1,000 Misc. Expenses Type Cost Flags $ 150 $ ‐ Total Cost $ 150

Total Expenses$ 4,900

Per Participant Income $ 50 Per Participant Expense $ 54 Subsidy per Athlete $ 4 Sport Net Income $ (400) Sport Profitability Baseball/Softball May‐June

Age Group(s) # of Participants Reg Fee Total Grades P‐4 145 $ 55 $ 7,986 Grades 5‐875 $ 75 $ 5,610

Total 220 $ 61.80 $ 13,596 Teams 18 Weeks of Play 6 Expenses

Uniform Jersey Cost Total Pay Jersey $ 16.25 $ 3,575 Hat $ 10.00 $ 2,200 Pants $ ‐ $ ‐ Total$ 5,775

Officiating # of Games # of Refs Per Game Pay Ref Costs Adult Referees 110 1$ 30.00 $ 3,300 Youth Referees 110 1$ 15.00 $ 1,650 Score Keeper 110 2$ 15.00 $ 3,300 Total Cost $ 8,250

Sport Directors # of People Season Pay Total Pay Director Season Pay 1$ 2,000 $ 2,000 Assistants 0$ 750 $ ‐ Other 0$ 500 $ ‐ Total Cost$ 2,000 Misc. Expenses Type Cost Misc. $ 150 Balls $ 300 Mounds $ 300 $ ‐ Total Cost $ 750

Total Expenses$ 16,775

Per Participant Income $ 62 Per Participant Expense $ 76 Subsidy per Athlete$ 14 Sport Net Income $ (3,179) Sport Profitability Tackle Football July ‐ September

Age Group(s) # of Participants Reg Fee Total All Ages: 25 $ 100 $ 2,500

Total 25 $ 100.00 $ 2,500 Teams 1 Weeks of Play 6 Expenses

Uniform Jersey Cost Total Pay Jersey $ ‐ $ ‐ Hat $ ‐ $ ‐ Pants 5$ 50.00 $ 250 Total$ 250

Officiating # of Games # of Refs Per Game Pay Ref Costs Adult Referees 4 4$ 75.00 $ 1,200 Youth Referees 0 1$ 35.00 $ ‐ Total Cost $ 1,200

Sport Directors # of People Season Pay Total Pay Director Season Pay 2$ 1,000 $ 2,000 Assistants 0$ 450 $ ‐ Other 0$ 500 $ ‐ Total Cost$ 2,000 Misc. Expenses Type Cost Misc. $ 150 $ ‐ Total Cost $ 150

Total Expenses$ 3,600

Per Participant Income $ 100 Per Participant Expense $ 144 Subsidy per Athlete$ 44 Sport Net Income $ (1,100) Sport Profitability Soccer August‐September

Age Group(s) # of Participants Reg Fee Total Grades P‐476 $ 35 $ 2,657 Grades 5‐839 $ 40 $ 1,564

Total 115 $ 36.70 $ 4,221 Teams 14 Weeks of Play 6 Expenses

Uniform Jersey Cost Total Pay Jersey $ 16.25 $ 1,869 Hat $ ‐ $ ‐ Pants $ ‐ $ ‐ Total$ 1,869

Officiating # of Games # of Refs Per Game Pay Ref Costs Adult Referees 86.25 1$ 20.00 $ 1,725 Youth Referees 86.25 0$ 15.00 $ ‐ Total Cost $ 1,725

Sport Directors # of People Season Pay Total Pay Director Season Pay 1$ 1,000 $ 1,000 Assistants 0$ 300 $ ‐ Other 0$ 500 $ ‐ Total Cost$ 1,000 Misc. Expenses Type Cost Misc $ 150 $ ‐ Total Cost $ 150

Total Expenses$ 4,744

Per Participant Income $ 37 Per Participant Expense $ 41 Subsidy per Athlete $ 5 Sport Net Income $ (523) Sport Profitability Basketball December‐February

Age Group(s) # of Participants Reg Fee Total Grades P‐4 106 $ 40 $ 4,224 Grades 5‐854 $ 50 $ 2,720

Total 160 $ 43.40 $ 6,944 Teams 20 Weeks of Play 8 Expenses

Uniform Jersey Cost Total Pay Jersey $ 13.00 $ 2,080 Hat $ ‐ $ ‐ Pants $ ‐ $ ‐ Total$ 2,080

Officiating # of Games # of Refs Per Game Pay Ref Costs Adult Referees 160 1$ 20.00 $ 3,200 Youth Referees 160 1$ 10.00 $ 1,600 Score Keepers 160 2$ 10.00 $ 3,200 Total Cost $ 8,000

Sport Directors # of People Season Pay Total Pay Director Season Pay 1$ 1,600 $ 1,600 Assistants 8$ 500 $ 4,000 Other 0$ 500 $ ‐ Total Cost$ 5,600 Misc. Expenses Type Cost Misc $ 900 $ ‐ Total Cost $ 900

Total Expenses$ 16,580

Per Participant Income $ 43 Per Participant Expense $ 104 Subsidy per Athlete$ 60 Sport Net Income $ (9,636) Resolution Adopting Final Tax Rates and Budgets Form PT-800C Report 800C - Calendar Year Entities pt-800C.xls Rev. 5/2018

County: ______Summit Year: ______2020

It is hereby resolved that the governing body of (entity name): ______North Summit Special Service Recreation District approves the following additional property tax revenue(s) for the year: ______2021 1 2 Fund/Budget Type Additional Revenue Above the Certified Rate Revenue General Operations $100,000

Total $100,000

This resolution is adopted after proper notice and hearing in accordance with UCA 59-2-919 and shall be forwarded to the County Auditor and the Tax Commission in accordance with UCA 59-2-913 and 59-2-920.

Signature of Governing Chair

Signature: ______Date: ______

Title: ______MARGARET H. OLSON

Criminal Division COUNTY ATTORNEY Civil Division

PATRICIA S. CASSELL DAVID L. THOMAS

Chief Prosecutor Chief Deputy

BLAKE R. HILLS JAMI R.BRACKIN Prosecuting Attorney Deputy County Attorney

IVY TELLES HELEN E. STRACHAN Prosecuting Attorney Deputy County Attorney

RYAN P.C. STACK . Deputy County Attorney

To: Summit County Council From: Helen Strachan, Deputy Summit County Attorney Date: December 9, 2020 Re: Public Hearing on Amendments to the Summit County Fee Schedule

In December of 2014, the Council adopted Ordinance 834, the countywide fee schedule, the amendments to which are attached hereto as Exhibit A. Below is a summary of proposed changes for 2021.

IT: IT is recommending adjustments to the fees associated with some data extract reports. These adjustments are based on the 10-year straight-line depreciation of the software, which “expired” in 2018.

Clerk: The passport fee as set by the federal government has increased $10.

Auditor: The Auditor is requesting an administrative fee to add to tax sales. This is a fee that has historically been charged but has not been added to the fee schedule. This fee is to conduct internal title searches and people searches related to property subject to tax sale.

Facilities: Facilities is requesting that we remove the $100 security deposit fee for reservations of Summit County conference rooms. We have not required such a deposit in the past and given the number of conference room requests, it is onerous to collect/reimburse this.

Public Works: In the past, the Henefer landfill did not allow for the disposal of animal carcasses. Public Works is now allowing it consistent with the disposal rates of other items. In addition, it is recommended that the monthly waste management service fee be increased from $40 to $60 per year. Also, we have clarified the language of what constitutes a “small load” (i.e. with a disposed weight of less than 570 pounds).

Civil Division: PO BOX 128 · 60 North Main Street · Coalville Utah 84017 · Telephone (435) 336-3206 ·Facsimile (435) 336-3287

Criminal Division: 6300 Justice Center Road · Park City Utah 84098 ·Telephone (435) 615-3828 · Facsimile (435) 608-4462

Email: (first initial)(last name)@summitcounty.org

Library: The library is recommending removal of the $10 collection fee related to failure to return items that are 45 days overdue. The library has not been collecting this fee but simply requires the replacement cost of the item.

Engineering: Engineering has recommended changes based on a Zion’s Bank fee study and will be reporting on those changes separately, however, since last week’s work session, we have added the changes to the attached Ordinance.

Miscellaneous: Pursuant to State law, the County has been petitioned by certified beekeepers to hire a contract bee hive inspector. We are currently in the process of hiring a bee inspector through the request for proposal process. In anticipation of that hire, we would like to establish a fee for such a service on a per hive basis. There is no precedent that we can find on a reasonable per hive fee for inspections. At this time, staff is recommending a $50 per hive fee. If it is later discovered that this fee is too low, we will recommend an amendment at a later time. If it is discovered that this fee is too high, we will go ahead and reduce the amount we charge per hive.

Staff recommends the Council hold a public hearing and approve Ordinance 834H. Thank you.

SUMMIT COUNTY, UTAH ORDINANCE NO. 834-H

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 834 COUNTY-WIDE FEE SCHEDULE FOR SUMMIT COUNTY

WHEREAS, pursuant to Utah Code Annotated §17-53-211, the legislative body of each county shall adopt an ordinance establishing fees for services provided by each county officer except for fees for the recorder, sheriff, and county constables and fees established by statute; and

WHEREAS, on December 10, 2014, the Summit County Council adopted Ordinance 834, a county-wide fee schedule; and

WHEREAS, as part of the annual budget process, Summit County departments review their fees and several departments believe that certain adjustments need to be made to some of the fees;

WHEREAS, a work session was held on December 2, 2020 and a public hearing on December 9, 2020 to discuss these changes;

NOW THEREFORE, the County Legislative Body of the County of Summit, State of Utah, hereby ordains as follows:

Section 2: The Council hereby amends the county-wide fee schedule attached hereto as Exhibit A.

Section 3: Effective Date: This Ordinance shall take effect fifteen (15) days after the date of its publication.

APPROVED, ADOPTED, AND PASSED and ordered published by the Summit County Council, this 9th day of December, 2020.

SUMMIT COUNTY COUNCIL SUMMIT COUNTY, UTAH

______By Council Chair

ATTEST:

SUMMIT COUNTY CLERK

Date of Publication ______, 2020.

Exhibit A

SUMMIT COUNTY, UTAH FEE SCHEDULE

Pursuant to Section 17-53-211, Utah Code Annotated, 1953, as amended, a Summit County, Utah Fee Schedule is hereby adopted in book form and by this reference made a part of the Summit County Code.

If paid by credit card, any fees within this Fee Schedule over $5,000.00 shall be subject to a credit card surcharge of 2.5%.

SUMMIT COUNTY GRAMA FEE SCHEDULE AND PROCESS FOR GRAMA REQUESTS

Process:  A person making a request for a Summit County record shall complete the “Request for Record – Utah Government Records Access and Management Act” prior to reviewing and/or receiving copies of records. In his/her discretion, the record custodian may accept the record request in a different format so long as the request contains the person’s name, mailing address, and daytime telephone number, if available, and a description of the record requested that identifies the record with reasonable specificity.

 The record request shall be submitted to the Summit County department/office that prepares, owns or retains the record.

 Upon receipt of the “Request for Record,” a response to the request shall be provided to the requestor within ten (10) business days unless: o the requester has demonstrated that the record request benefits the public rather than the person (in which case response shall be within five (5) business days); or o “extraordinary circumstances” pursuant to Utah Code Annotated §63G-2-204(5) exists, which allows the department to delay approval or denial for an additional period of time.

Fees:  The costs for processing GRAMA requests and/or copies are set forth in the below GRAMA fee schedule.  Summit County requires payment of past fees and future estimated fees prior to processing a request if: o fees are expected to exceed $50.00; or o the requester had not paid fees from previous requests.  If the requester simply wants to inspect a record, they may do so at no charge, however, staff time for compiling the request or for costs of any copies requested thereafter, shall apply.  Fee Waivers: Summit County may fulfill a record request without charge and is encouraged to do so when it determines that: o Releasing the record primarily benefits the public rather than a person; o The individual requesting the record is the subject of the record; or o The requester’s rights are directly implicated by the information in the record, and the requester is impecunious.  Fee Waiver Appeals: A person who believes that there has been an unreasonable denial of a fee waiver may appeal the denial in the same manner as a person who appeals the inspection of a public record under UCA §63G-2-205 by filing a notice of appeal within 30 days.

GRAMA FEE SCHEDULE

Copies Fee Additional Information 8 ½” x 11” non-color copies $.50 / sheet 8 ½” x 11” color copies $1.00/ sheet 11” x 17” copies $1.00/ sheet 18” x 18” plats $3.00 / sheet 24” x 36” plats (standard size) $5.00 / sheet 24” x 36” plats (color copy) $8.00 / sheet Plats larger than 24” x 36” $8.00 / sheet Odd sized copies Actual cost to reproduce

Copies of videos $15.00 / video recording Copies of audio $15.00 / audio recording USB drives $15.00/ 8 GB drive Other media Actual costs

Accident Reports (DI-9) $5.00 / report Sheriff Incident Reports $5.00 / report Incident Photographs (up to $1.00 / photo ten photographs) Incident Photographs (more $10.00 Photographs are put on a than ten photographs) compact disc Dispatch tapes (minimum 1 $20.00 / hour hour) Inmate mug shots $5.00 / picture

Services Notary Services $5.00 / signature to notarize Certification of a document $2.00 / certification Records delivered by $.75 / page + plus telephone facsimile charges for long distance over 10 pages Mailing and shipping costs $2.00 for staff mail Actual mailing costs are those preparation time, plus actual for U.S. Postal Service or an mailing costs if greater than authorized delivery service $2.00 such as UPS, FedEx, etc. Staff time required to search, Actual cost, not to exceed the The first 15 minutes of staff compile and otherwise prepare hourly rate (not to include time shall be at no charge. to provide a record benefits) of the lowest paid employee who, in the Staff time for photocopying, discretion of the record’s faxing, and providing custodian, has the necessary documents in electronic skill and training to perform format (i.e. video, audio or the request. USB drive) is included in the costs for those items. 5

IT Department requests to run $4026.00 / report if report data extract reports from Tyler takes less than 15 minutes to run

$213128.00 / reports that take 1 hour to run

Reports that take more than 15 minutes but less than an hour shall be prorated to the closest 15 minute increment.

$224145.00 / each additional hour to run IT Department requests to run $16.5014.00 / report if report data extract reports from ESRI takes less than 15 minutes to run

$54 71.00 / reports that take 1 hour to run

Reports that take more than 15 minutes but less than an hour shall be prorated to the closest 15 minute increment.

$64 90.00 / each additional hour to run IT Department / Auditor $40.00 / report if report takes Department requests to run less than 15 minutes to run data extract reports from Caselle $213.00 / reports that take 1 hour to run

Reports that take more than 15 minutes but less than an hour shall be prorated to the closest 15 minute increment.

$224.00 / each additional hour to run

SUMMIT COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM FINE SCHEDULE

CLERK’S OFFICE Fine

Removal of “Unlicensed Business” sign $100.00

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

Fine

Sign Violation $100.00

Re-inspection $100.00

Setback Violation $200.00

Development Activity without a permit $250.00

Prohibited Land Use $500.00

Junk Ordinance #456 $500.00

Any other violation not listed $250.00

PUBLIC WORKS AND ENGINEERING 1st offense Fine 2nd offense Fine

Re-inspection $100.00

Tracking mud on the road $100.00 $200.00

Steel tracked equipment driven on road $500.00 $750.00

Failure to maintain sediment/erosion control $100.00 $200.00

Illegal excavation, grading, or placement of fill on private property $500.00 $1000.00

Illegal driveway encroachment $200.00 $500.00

Illegal excavation in County right-of-way $200.00 $500.00

Illicit discharge $500.00 $750.00

Illegal Use of Dumpster or Recycle Dumpster $250.00 $500.00

Other violations not listed $250.00 $500.00 7

1st offense Fine 2nd offense Fine

Snow deposited in public right-of-way from $50.00 $100.00 private property

Parking within County right-of-way during winter $50.00 $100.00 Season PUBLIC WORKS AND ENGINEERING 1st offense Fine 2nd offense Fine

Re-inspection $100.00

Tracking mud on the road $200.00 $300.00

Steel tracked equipment driven on road $500.00 $750.00

Failure to maintain sediment/erosion control $100.00 $200.00

Illegal excavation, grading, or placement of fill on private property $500.00 $1000.00

Illegal driveway encroachment $200.00 $500.00

Illegal excavation in County right-of-way $500.00 $1000.00

Illicit discharge $500.00 $750.00

Illegal Use of Dumpster or Recycle Dumpster $250.00 $500.00

Other violations not listed $250.00 $500.00

1st offense Fine 2nd offense Fine

Snow deposited in public right-of-way from $50.00 $100.00 private property

Parking within County right-of-way during winter $50.00 $100.00 Season

ANIMAL CONTROL

Fine

Failure to License $50.00

Failure to Display License Tag $25.00

Harboring Stray Dog $100.00

Dogs Running At Large

1st Offense $100.00*

2nd Offense $150.00*

3rd Offense $200.00*

+ additional $100 for each additional violation*

*The applicable fine is doubled if the dog is unsterilized

Domesticated Animal At Large

1st Offense $75.00

2nd Offense $100.00

3rd Offense $150.00

+ additional $50 for each additional violation

Places Prohibited to Dogs $100.00

Dog Attacking Persons or Animals (if the attack results in a bite, defined by the code as “an actual puncture, tear, or abrasion of the skin.”)

1st Offense $500.00

2nd Offense $750.00

3rd Offense $1000.00

Dog Attacking, Chasing or Worrying Persons or Animals $300.00

Vicious Animal / Dog $500.00

Nuisance Animal $75.00

Failure to Report Dog Bite $50.00

Failure to Vaccinate $50.00

Failure to Complete a Certificate of Rabies Vaccination $50.00

Failure to Report a Rabid Animal $100.00

Removal of Quarantined Animal $50.00

Cruelty to Animals $500.00

Failure to Procure a Kennel Permit $250.00

Interference with Officer $250.00

Sterilization offenses per Section 5-1-18(F) $250 for first offense $500 for subsequent offenses

Unpaid Citations are subject to a late fee of 10% the amount owed for every 30 days the citation is unpaid.

SUMMIT COUNTY ANIMAL CONTROL FEES

*Please note that some Animal Control fees are subject to change based upon market prices

Licenses

One Year Licenses, if applicable Shelter $12.00 (sterilized) $36.00 unsterilized) Vet $12.00 (sterilized) $36.00 (unsterilized)

Three Year Licenses, if applicable Shelter $20.00 (sterilized) $50.00 (unsterilized) Vet $20.00 (sterilized) $50.00 (unsterilized) (vet keeps $2.00)

Late Fee: $10.00

Replacement Dog Tag: $5.00

Impound Fees Dogs

1st offense $35.00 2nd offense $45.00 3rd offense $55.00 Each subsequent $85.00

Impound Fees Cats

1st offense $35.00 2nd offense $45.00 3rd offense $55.00 Each subsequent $85.00

Board Fees for Cats and Dogs

$10.00 / day

Trap Rentals $30.00 (deposit)

Adoption Fees Dogs/Cats $10.00

Sterilization Fees

Male Dog $45.00 Female Dog 0-25 lbs $50.00 25-50 lbs $60.00 51-75 lbs $70.00 76+ lbs $80.00

Male Cat $30.00 Female Cat $35.00

Kennel Permit Fees:

Commercial and Private Kennels: 5-15 dogs: $50.00 (annually)

Commercial and Private Kennels: 16 or more dogs: $100.00 (annually)

Late fee $25.00

Vaccination Fees

Dog DA2PP 6 months and over $15.00 DA2PPC under 6 months $18.00 Cat FVCRP all cats $12.00

Rabies Dog and Cats

$12.00

ATTORNEY’S OFFICE DISCOVERY FEES IN CRIMINAL CASES

A. Criminal Discovery Requests: In order to provide for fair and consistent charges to all parties and pursuant to the ordinance adopted by the Summit County Council, the Summit County Attorney’s Office shall charge and collect the following fees in criminal cases.

a. Initial Discovery Packet of documents: $5.00 for black and white hard copies.

b. Supplemental Discovery Packets: No charge, unless color copies are requested or the supplemental discover request is over 50 pages, in which case it is $5.00

c. Media Storage Device (i.e. video tape, DVD disc, CD disc, or audiocassette) $15.00 per copy

d. Color Copies of any documents $.50 per page

B. Fee Collection: The Summit County Attorney’s Office may, in its discretion, charge and collect the above fees prior to releasing any documents or materials.

C. Production to other formats: Actual costs of conversion, including time for staff or technical personnel to make the conversion at their hourly rate plus benefits. An estimate shall be provided by the Summit County Attorney’s Office and prepayment may be required before the conversion is commenced.

D. Fee Waivers: Notwithstanding the above provisions,

a. The Summit County Attorney’s Office may, in the interest of justice or the public interest, waive all or part of any fees or charges in filling a request to produce any record or document. b. The Summit County Attorney’s Office shall not collect fees for providing discovery when discovery is made available via email or internet accessible database, however it may charge for the actual costs of conversion as provided for in Section C above. c. The Summit County Attorney’s Office shall not collect fees for providing discovery in juvenile cases, except for those cases that are certified to the district court or those that are directly filed with the district court pursuant to Utah Code Annotated §78A-6-701. d. The Summit County Attorney’s Office shall not collect fees from those public defenders under contract with the County or from indigent defendants not represented by counsel.

SUMMIT COUNTY AUDITOR’S OFFICE

Tax Sale Administration Fee ………………………………………………………$275.00

SUMMIT COUNTY CLERK’S OFFICE

Business Licenses License Fee Late Fees Commercial (including solicitors) $200.00 $50, $100, $200* Nightly Rental or Condotel Units $200.00/unit In-home Business $75.00 $25, $50, $75* Temporary - Up to 5 Days $100.00 * 15, 30, and 45 days

Alcohol licenses License Fee Off-Premises Beer Retailer $250.00 Reception Centers $300.00 On-Premises (recreational, banquet/catering, tavern) $500.00 Manufacturing (distillery, brewery, winery, brewery with on-premise $350.00 consumption) Package Agency $250.00 Clubs (equity, fraternal, dining, or social) $600.00 Restaurants(full service, limited service, beer-only) $500.00 Special Use $250.00 Event Permit (single event or temporary special event) Event that is 1- 5 days: $125.00

Event that is 6 or more days: $300.00 Liquor Warehouse $350.00 Beer wholesaling $300.00 Any category of state license not otherwise listed above $300.00

Event Licenses License Fee Description Less than 5 Small Event License $500.00 Vendors Mass Single Event - Category 6-15 A $1,000.00 Vendors Mass Single Event - Category 16-50 B $2,000.00 Vendors Mass Single Event - Category 51-100 C $3,000.00 Vendors Mass Ongoing Event - 6-15 Category D $1,500.00 Vendors Mass Ongoing Event - 16-50 Category E $2,500.00 Vendors Mass Ongoing Event - 51-100

Category F $3,500.00 Vendors

Clerk Service Fee Passport Photos $10.00 (set of two) Passport Execution Fee $2535.00 (set by Federal law) Certified Marriage Licenses $6.00 Voter File $25.00 + $0.005 per voter Filing Fees Set in State code Marriage Licenses $50.00 ($40 to Clerk and $10 to State; includes 2 certified copies) Badge fee for solicitors $20.00

SUMMIT COUNTY SPECIAL EVENT PERMIT FEES

Level One Special Event: $100.00

Level Two Special Event: $300.00

Level Three Special Event: $500.00

First Amendment Event: No Charge

*Applications submitted late shall be charged double fees to cover the cost of expediting the review process

SUMMIT COUNTY FACILITIES FEES (no fees found herein are allowed to be pro-rated)

Summit County Senior Center (150 Park Rd, Coalville) (kitchen not included)  $30.00 / day (for members) plus a $50 security deposit  $50.00 / day (for nonmembers) plus a $50 security deposit

Ledges Event Center (202 East Park Road, Coalville)  Multi-Purpose Room (rental fees include use of the kitchen, foyer and outside patio) o Summit County resident, $300.00 per four (4) hour block (Monday non-profit organization, through Friday) military/veteran or $350.00 per four (4) hour block (Saturday or Sunday) governmental entity $400.00 security deposit

o Non-Resident $800.00 per four (4) hour block Monday through Friday) $850.00 per four (4) hour block (Saturday or Sunday) $400.00 security deposit

o Commercial Use Summit County Resident or Non-Resident Fees as shown above plus $65.00 per hour $400.00 security deposit  Kitchen (only al a carte rental) $50.00 per reservation  Conference Room $50.00 per four (4) hour block (Monday through Friday) $75.00 per four (4) hour block (Saturday or Sunday) $100.00 security deposit  AV equipment $25/hour (regardless of what is being used. Summit County IT personnel required to set up and operate all AV equipment in the Center).  Arenas (Coalville)  $100.00 /day  $20.00 / hour  $110.00 / day if dragging and watering needed Barns (Coalville)  $100.00/day

Ball Field (Coalville)  $25.00/day for social functions  $200.00 per field per day for games/tournaments (unless reserved by a governmental entity within Summit County for routine games and practices associated with a school team, league or club; all tournaments are subject to this charge)

Summit County Conference Rooms (not including Ledges Event Center)  $25.00 per reservation if a conference room is used during normal business hours  $50.00 per reservation if a conference room is used outside normal business hours  $100.00 security deposit (this deposit amount may be increased by the Facilities Director, if the number of persons anticipated using the rooms exceed 100 persons per use)

Filming Activities (as defined by the Summit County Code) on County property  $1000.00 per four hour block (four hour minimum) + $1000 security deposit per four hour block The above charge shall be assessed on a per filming location basis as shall be further outlined in the “Summit County Location and Equipment Rental Agreement.”

Staff Assistance: If Summit County staff assistance is requested or required, due to the nature of the event taking place at a County facility, staff time shall be charged at a rate of $75 per hour per staff member (four hour minimum) or $150 per hour per staff member, if a federal or state holiday (four hour minimum)

SUMMIT COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS

SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT FEE SCHEDULE

3-Mile Henefer Item Fee Fee Conditions/Description Disposal Items Household Waste (not $35/ton Not  $10 Small Load* - Flat Fee. C&D) Allowed  Garbage, refuse, food packaging, food scraps, similar items originating from home or apartment  Lithium Batteries Prohibited  Out of County waste is charged at 2.5 times resident rate Construction/Demolition $35/ton $33/ton  Lumber scraps, sheetrock, dirt, concrete, etc. Waste (C&D)  $10 Small Load* - Flat Fee  Loads larger than Small Loads NOT allowed at 3- Mile. Small Loads must be separated as directed into Public Drop Off Bins  Proof of Residency Required at 3-Mile  Out of County debris charged at 2.5 times resident rate Household Hazardous Free Not  Chemical products such as cleaning solvents, Waste Allowed paints, pesticides  Waste may contain substances that can catch fire, react with other chemicals, explode, or are corrosive or toxic  Out of County materials NOT ALLOWED Green Waste $35/ton $33/ton  Grass Clippings, Tree Limbs, Leaves  May not be mixed with C&D or Household Waste  $10 Small Load* - Flat Fee  Proof of Residency Required at 3-Mile  Out of County debris charged at 2.5 times resident rate Animal Carcasses $35/ton Not  $10 Small Load* - Flat Fee Allowed  Out of County carcasses NOT ALLOWED $33/ton Refrigerators, AC Units $12 $12 Each  Out of County units charged at 2.5 times resident (Anything containing Each rate Freon) Mattresses $18 $18 Each  Mattresses Containing Bed Bugs or other Each contamination must be identified prior to disposal Tires $3 per $3 per Per Tire, 1”-18” dia. rim size $5 per $5 per Per Tire, 19”-23” dia. rim size $15 per $15 per Per Tire, 24”+ dia. rim size (equipment/tractor, etc.)  Maximum of 4 per day per household  No Commercial Disposal Residential Recyclables Free Free  Target recyclables are corrugated cardboard and 20

3-Mile Henefer Item Fee Fee Conditions/Description (“Target” Only) aluminum cans  Comingled Recyclables are collected curbside only Special Handling Waste $85 $85  See Notes below** Household E-Waste $10 $10 Each  No Commercial Disposal Each  Out of County debris charged at 2.5 times resident rate Metal No No  Metal must be free of non-metal debris Charge Charge Saleable Products Chipped Green Waste $25/ $25/ (Unscreened) Scoop Scoop Re-Use Items $5 $5 Each  For items located in Re-Use Bin/Area Only Each  General Public is not allowed within the working landfill area to scavenge or for any other purpose

*Small Load includes the following: car, standard pickup, single axle trailer less than 8 ft long x 6 ft wide (not combined with pickup) with a disposed weight of less than 570 pounds. This does not apply to commercial applications of any kind.

**Special Handling Waste includes: Customer requested special handling, state listed special wastes (per UACR 315-315), operationally necessary special handling (as determined by the Solid Waste Superintendent), or any waste delivered by a commercial entity/business requiring the completion of a profile form (as determined by the special waste coordinator or executive director). Special Waste may be denied at the sole discretion of the Solid Waste Superintendent.

Solid Waste Superintended may be contacted through the Public Works Office at (435) 336-3970 to schedule an appointment or for a more detailed explanation of Special Waste Fees.

CHARGE FOR UNCOVERED/UNSECURED LOADS: Utah state law requires loads on vehicles be confined, secured, and fastened. Per Utah Code Annotated, §72-7-409 (2), “… a person may not:

1. Operate a vehicle with an unsecured load on any highway; or 2. Operate a vehicle carrying trash or garbage without a covering over the entire load.

Violation of this law is subject to a fine of not less than $200.”

It is the policy of Summit County to charge a double fee, per load, for all unsecured loads.

SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT FEE

A Solid Waste Management fee of $40 60 is charged to each developed property within the Political Subdivision of Summit County, regardless of whether or not the property receives curbside trash and recycling service or is serviced by a dumpster facility (i.e. cabin and other isolated properties). The term “Developed” means any property having a permanent structure that is or may be occupied by a person or persons, such as a primary residence, secondary residence, recreational cabin, garage/barn with restroom and/or sleeping facilities, 21 or any other similar structure. This definition includes mobile homes or trailers that are permanently or semi- permanently affixed to the ground or on wheels if the intent is to occupy the unit as a residence. Recreational or occasional use campers are not included unless on a foundation or “skirted” to mitigate weather impacts.

WEED DEPARTMENT

Chemical Sales: The prices for chemical sales may be found on the Summit County Weed Department website (http://summitcounty.org/155/Weed-Division). These prices are subject to change based market prices

Personnel and Equipment:

Truck w/1300 Gallon Sprayer $45/hr

Truck w/300 Gallon Sprayer $30/hr

Truck (1 Ton) $25/hr

Trailer $ 3/hr

ATV w/Sprayer $20/hr

Labor $40/hr

Helicopter $10/acre

SUMMIT COUNTY LIBRARY

FEES

 The replacement cost of a lost or damaged card is $1.00  The replacement cost for magazine envelopes, video/audio cases, hanging bags, etc. varies.  The replacement cost of lost or damaged items is set forth in the Collection Development Policy  Lost interlibrary loan items will be billed from the lending library with a $5.00 processing fee added.  Once an item is paid for no refund will be made.  A fee of $20.00 will be assessed for returned checks after 30 days.  After the account is 45 days overdue, it will be turned over to collections and any replacement costs plus a $10.00 collection fee will be assessed to the account.

CLASSES

 Six week Driver’s License class for Spanish speakers: $40.00

SUMMIT COUNTY RECORDER AND SURVEYOR FEES

1) The Premium Access Data Portal Subscription Fee shall be: a. $4,800.00 per year b. One-time installation fee of $250.00 c. One-time licensing fee of $750.00

2) Filing fee for surveys pursuant to Utah State Code, Section 17-23-2: $20

3) All other Recorder and Surveyor Fees are set forth in Utah State Code, Section 17-23-2, as amended and Section 17-21-18.5, as amended.

SUMMIT COUNTY SHERIFF

1) The fees charged by the Summit County Sheriff’s Office are set forth by Utah State Code, Section 17-22-2.5, as amended.

2) Use of Sheriff Deputies:

$85 per hour per deputy (four hour minimum)

$170 per hour per deputy, if a federal or state holiday (four hour minimum)

3) Use of Sheriff Vehicles and/or Equipment (i.e. as a prop for filming activities)

$150 per hour (4 hour minimum) * Deputy shall be present to operate the vehicle and/or oversee the use of equipment.

SUMMIT COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT FEE SCHEDULE

1) Agricultural Protection Area: $100

2) Administrative Appeal: $400

3) Board of Adjustment Application: $1,000

4) Conditional Use Permit a. Residential: $1,000 b. Non-Residential: $2,500 c. Wind Turbine, Solar, or Recycling Facility i. Residential: $100 ii. Non-Residential: $500 for first acre or 1,000 square feet of disturbed area, and $100 per additional acre or 1,000 square feet a. If the parcel is less than one acre, the fee shall be $500

5) Condominium Plat: $250/ lot or unit

6) Development Agreement: $1,000 paid with initial application, plus an additional $2,000 to be paid prior to County Council action

7) Development Agreement Amendment: a. $1,000 for amendments requiring a public hearing b. $500 for minor amendments that do not require a public hearing

8) Development Code Amendment: $2,500

9) Final Site Plan a. Residential: $30 / lot or unit b. Non-Residential: $2,500 flat fee

10) Final Subdivision Plat: $150 / lot or unit

11) General Plan Amendment: $3,000

12) Lot Line Adjustment: $500

13) Lot of Record Determination: $50 / parcel

14) Low Impact Permit a. Residential: $250 b. Non-Residential: $1,000 c. Wind Turbine, Solar, or Recycling Facility i. Residential: $100 ii. Non-Residential: $250 for first acre or 1,000 square feet of disturbed area, and $100 per additional acre or 1,000 square feet a. If the parcel is less than one acre, the fee shall be $250 15) Plat Amendment a. Administrative process (if no public hearing is held): $500 b. Public process (if a public hearing is held): $1,000 26

16) Preliminary Plan a. Residential: $300 /lot or unit b. Non-Residential: $2,500 flat fee

17) Public Hearing Notification and Publication: $2.00/individual notice and actual cost of newspaper publication.

18) Rezone (Zone District Map Amendment): $2,000

19) Sign Permit: $100/sign

20) Sketch Plan a. Residential: $25 / lot or unit b. Non-Residential: $500 flat fee

21) SPA Plan a. Residential: $30 /lot b. Non-Residential: $90 /acre of disturbed land or 1,000 square feet of building footprint area (whichever is greater). i. If the parcel is less than one acre, the fee shall be $90

22) Special Exception: $1,000

23) Temporary Use Permit a. Residential: $400 first time ($100 renewal fee for each time permit is renewed) b. Non-Residential: $1,000 first time fee ($100 renewal fee for each time permit is renewed)

24) Vested Rights Determination a. Residential: $500 for first commonly owned lot; $150 for each additional lot with a cap of $2,500 total for a single application b. Non-Residential: $500 for use up to 5,000 square feet (or 1 acre for outdoor use); $2,500 for all others

SUMMIT COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEE SUMMIT COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEE AND BONDING SCHEDULE

1) Administrative Appeal (If Engineering is involved): $250

2) Board of Adjustment Application: $450200 a. Board of Adjustment Legal Notice: $150 b. Notification and Publication: $2.00/individual mailed post card notice

3) Conditional Use Permit a. Residential: $75020 Non-Residential: $90 /acre of disturbed land b. If the development parcel is less than one acre, the fee shall be $901,250 c. Wind Turbine, Solar, Recycling Facility i. Residential: $100 ii. Non-Residential: $50045 /acre of disturbed land, and $100 per each additional acre a. If the development parcel is less than one acre, the fee shall be $45

4) Condominium Plat: $5035 /lot or unit

5) Construction Plan a. Residential of less than 10 lots: $1,500250 b. Residential of 10 lots or more: $2,000550 c. Non-Residential of less than 100,000 square feet of disturbed land: $1,750400 d. Non-Residential of 100,000 square feet or more of disturbed land: $2,150750 e. Engineering Construction Inspection Fee i. For projects whose estimated construction cost is less than or equal to $500,000, the fee is 2.01.5% times the construction cost.* ii. For projects whose estimated construction cost is more than $500,000, the fee is $10,07,500 plus 0.15% times the construction cost.* * Construction costs to be included in the fee calculation are all "Civil" Improvements less sewer and water; it does not include building or structure improvement costs.

6) Development Agreement: $1,00085

7) Development Agreement Amendment: a. Public hearing required: $1,000 b. No public hearing required: $750 $85

8) Excavation Encroachments and Structures in the County Right of Way a. Excavation Permit: $150 Base Fee or the first 100 linear feet + $10 per additional 100 linear feet b. Driveway Encroachment Permit i. $200 per Encroachment ii. $100 Re-inspection Fee c. Structure Encroachment Permit: $100 first structure + $10 per additional structure d. Excavation Completion Bond: $400 per 100 feet of trench ($1000 min) e. Asphalt Cut Repair Bond: $500 plus $50 per square foot 28

f. Driveway Bond: 120% of the estimated cost to complete restoration and revegetation g. Road Closure Permit: $100

9) Final Site Plan a. Residential: $5 /lot or unit750 Non-Residential: $5 /acre of disturbed land b. If the development parcel is less than one acre, the fee shall be $5800

10) Final Subdivision Plat: $5015 /lot or unit

11) Floodplain Development Permit: $500

Application Review: $200 per application 12) Floodplain Determinations: $50 per request

13) Grading, Excavating and Filling on Private Property a. Grading Permit i. Less than 5,000 cubic yards: $250/application ii. Equal to or more than 5,000 cubic yards: $450/application b. Revegetation Bond: 120% of the estimated cost to complete revegetation c. Completion Bond: 120% of the estimated cost to complete restoration

14) Lot Line Adjustment: $30040

15) Low Impact Permit a. Residential: $30040 b. Non-Residential: $500130 c. Wind Turbine, Solar, Recycling Facility i. Residential: $10020 ii. Non-Residential: $25065 for the first acre, and $100 per each additional acre/acre of disturbed land a. If the development parcel is less than one acre, the fee shall be $25065

16) Plat Amendment: a. Administrative process: $300 b. Public Process: $40040

17) Preliminary Plan a. Residential: $75030/lot or unit b. Non-Residential: $800

18) Preliminary Sub Plat a. Residential: $35030/lot or unit Non-Residential: $40030 /acre of disturbed land b. If the development parcel is less than one acre, the fee shall be $30

19) Public Hearing Notification and Publication: $2.00/individual notice and actual cost of newspaper publication

20) Road Vacation Petition: $425

21) Sketch Plan a) Residential: $20/lot or unit30/lot or unit b) Non-Residential: $300 30 /acre of disturbed land

22) SPA Plan a. Residential: $1,250 b. Non-Residential: $1,250

23) Special Exception: $400

24) Temporary Use Permit c) Residential: $25030/lot or unit d) Non-Residential: $350

Excavation Encroachments and Structures in the County Right of Way Excavation Permit: $150 Base Fee or the first 100 linear feet + $10 per additional 100 linear feet Driveway Encroachment Permit $200 per Encroachment $100 Re-inspection Fee Structure Encroachment Permit: $100 first structure + $10 per additional structure Excavation Completion Bond: $400 per 100 feet of trench ($1500 min) Asphalt Cut Repair Bond: $500 plus $50 per square foot Driveway Bond: 120% of the estimated cost to complete restoration and revegetation Road Closure Permit: $100

Excavation, Grading, and Filling on Private Property Grading Permit Less than 5,000 cubic yards: $150/application Equal to or more than 5,000 cubic yards: $400/application Revegetation Bond: 120% of the estimated cost to complete revegetation Completion Bond: 120% of the estimated cost to complete restoration

Floodplain Development Application Review: $200 per application Floodplain Determinations: $50 per request

25) Weed Control Plan a. Weed Control Plan Review and Inspection (Grading Permits, Construction Plan Permits, Final Site Plan) i. $250 per Plan (includes one plan review and four required inspections) ii. $50 per re-inspection fee b. Weed Bond (Grading Permits, Construction Plan Permits): $300 / disturbed acre 30

c. Weed Control Fee (Excavation Permits): i. $10 / first 1,000 square feet of disturbed area; plus ii. $0.010 /sq. ft. for area disturbed over first 1,000 sq ft up to 10,000 sq ft of disturbed area; plus $0.006 /sq. ft. for area disturbed over 10,000 sq ft.

26) Stormwater: Erosion Control and Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewers (MS4) a. SWPPP Reviews i. Residential > 1 acre: $150 ii. Residential < 1 acre (if part of a common plan of development): $70 iii. High Priority: $150 iv. Commercial > 1 acre: $300 v. Commercial < 1 acre: $250 b. SWPPP Monthly Inspections i. Residential > 1 acre: $75 ii. Residential < 1 acre (if part of a common plan of development): $60 iii. High Priority: $175 iv. Commercial > 1 acre: $100 v. Commercial < 1 acre: $75 c. Erosion Control Permit: i. Sites less than 1 acre: a. $100 per application b. $100 re-inspection fee ii. Sites of 1 acre or more: a. $200 application + $20/each additional acre b. Re-inspection fee: $100 iii. Bond: 120% of estimated cost to install and maintain

d. Long Term Stormwater Management Plan (5 year inspections) i. Residential > 1 acre, part of current LTSWMP: $400 ii. Residential > 1 acre, NOT part of current LTSWMP: $600 iii. Residential < 1 acre, part of current LTSWMP: $300 iv. Commercial > 1 acre, part of current LTSWMP: $700 v. Commercial > 1 acre, NOT part of current LTSWMP: $1000 vi. Commercial < 1 acre, part of current LTSWMP: $500

AND BONDING SCHEDULE

Board of Adjustment Application: $200 Board of Adjustment Legal Notice: $150 Notification and Publication: $2.00/individual mailed post card notice

Conditional Use Permit Residential: $20 Non-Residential: $90 /acre of disturbed land If the development parcel is less than one acre, the fee shall be $90 Wind Turbine, Solar, Recycling Facility Residential: $10 31

Non-Residential: $45 /acre of disturbed land If the development parcel is less than one acre, the fee shall be $45

Condominium Plat: $35 /lot or unit

Construction Plan Residential of less than 10 lots: $250 Residential of 10 lots or more: $550 Non-Residential of less than 100,000 square feet of disturbed land: $400 Non-Residential of 100,000 square feet or more of disturbed land: $750 Engineering Construction Inspection Fee For projects whose estimated construction cost is less than or equal to $500,000, the fee is 1.5% times the construction cost.* For projects whose estimated construction cost is more than $500,000, the fee is $7,500 plus 0.1% times the construction cost.* * Construction costs to be included in the fee calculation are all "Civil" Improvements less sewer and water; it does not include building or structure improvement costs.

Development Agreement: $85

Development Agreement Amendment: $85

Final Site Plan Residential: $5 /lot or unit Non-Residential: $5 /acre of disturbed land If the development parcel is less than one acre, the fee shall be $5

Final Subdivision Plat: $15 /lot or unit

Lot Line Adjustment: $40

Low Impact Permit Residential: $40 Non-Residential: $130 Wind Turbine, Solar, Recycling Facility Residential: $20 Non-Residential: $65 /acre of disturbed land If the development parcel is less than one acre, the fee shall be $65

Plat Amendment: $40

Preliminary Plan Residential: $30/lot or unit Non-Residential: $30 /acre of disturbed land If the development parcel is less than one acre, the fee shall be $30

Public Hearing Notification and Publication: $2.00/individual notice and actual cost of newspaper publication

Road Vacation Petition: $300

SPA Plan Residential: $15 / lot Non-Residential: $15 /acre of disturbed land If the development parcel is less than one acre, the fee shall be $15

Floodplain Development Application Review: $200 per application Floodplain Determinations: $50 per request

Weed Control Plan Weed Control Plan Review and Inspection (Grading Permits, Construction Plan Permits, Final Site Plan) $250 per Plan (includes one plan review and four required inspections) $50 per re-inspection fee Weed Bond (Grading Permits, Construction Plan Permits): $300 / disturbed acre Weed Control Fee (Excavation Permits): $10 / first 1,000 square feet of disturbed area; plus $0.010 /sq. ft. for area disturbed over first 1,000 sq ft up to 10,000 sq ft of disturbed area; plus $0.006 /sq. ft. for area disturbed over 10,000 sq ft.

Stormwater: Erosion Control and Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewers (MS4) Encroachment Permits (includes single family homes): Projects of disturbance 1 acre or more or a part of the residential common plan of development: $150 / initial MS4 documentation review; $75 per month Projects of disturbance less than 1 acre or not a part of the residential common plan: $30 per month 33

* The applicant shall be required to pay the above fees before the next inspection will be scheduled. Commercial Development: (includes commercial projects and multi-housing unit projects): High Priority Projects (1 acre or greater): $150 initial MS4 documentation review, $200 per month Projects 1 acre or greater (not deemed high priority): $150 initial MS4 documentation review, $150 per month Projects less than 1 acre: $100 per month

Grading Permits: Projects of disturbance 1 acre or greater: $150 initial MS4 documentation review; $75 per month Projects of disturbance less than 1 acre: $30 per month Erosion Control Permits: Projects of disturbance 1 acre or greater or a part of the residential common plan of development: $150 initial MS4 documentation review, $75 per month Projects of disturbance less than 1 acre or not a part of the residential common plan: $30 per month Erosion Control Permit Bond: 120% estimated cost to implement Formatted: Normal, Left, Widow/Orphan control, Adjust space between Latin and Asian text, Adjust space between Asian text and numbers

SUMMIT COUNTY BUILDING DEPARTMENT FEE SCHEDULE (fees are based on cost per square foot)

1) Building Valuations a. Agricultural Buildings: $20 per square foot b. Commercial Structures per the International Building Code (IBC): Cost per square foot as reported in the Building Safety Journal published by the International Code Council (ICC) and outlined in the table listed below:

Summit County Valuation per Square Foot for Building Permit Calculations a, b, c, d, e Calendar Year 2021

Type of Construction (2015 International Building Code Occupancy Group (2015 International Building Code) IA IB IIA IIB IIIA IIIB IV VA VB A-1 Assembly, theaters, with stage $226.92 $219.10 $213.80 $205.04 $192.95 $187.36 $198.56 $176.18 $169.73 A-1 Assembly, theaters, without stage $207.97 $200.15 $194.85 $186.09 $174.15 $168.55 $179.61 $157.38 $150.92 A-2 Assembly, nightclubs $177.49 $172.34 $167.98 $161.18 $151.95 $147.76 $155.52 $137.58 $132.93 A-2 Assembly, restaurants, bars, banquet halls $176.49 $171.34 $165.98 $160.18 $149.95 $146.76 $154.52 $135.58 $131.93 A-3 Assembly, churches $209.94 $202.13 $196.83 $188.07 $176.32 $170.72 $181.59 $159.54 $153.09 A-3 Assembly, general, community halls, libraries, museums $175.12 $167.31 $161.01 $153.25 $140.50 $135.90 $146.77 $123.72 $118.27 A-4 Assembly, arenas $206.97 $199.15 $192.85 $185.09 $172.15 $167.55 $178.61 $155.38 $149.92 B Business $181.12 $174.43 $168.67 $160.26 $146.18 $140.70 $153.97 $128.34 $122.72 E Educational $192.29 $185.47 $180.15 $172.12 $160.72 $152.55 $166.18 $140.46 $136.18 F-1 Factory and industrial, moderate hazard $108.53 $103.54 $97.56 $93.81 $84.17 $80.36 $89.86 $70.57 $66.08 F-2 Factory and industrial, low hazard $107.53 $102.54 $97.56 $92.81 $84.17 $79.36 $88.86 $70.57 $65.08 H-1 High Hazard, explosives $101.60 $96.60 $91.63 $86.88 $78.44 $73.62 $82.93 $64.84 N.P. H234 High Hazard $101.60 $96.60 $91.63 $86.88 $78.74 $73.62 $82.93 $64.84 $59.35 H-5 HPM $181.12 $174.43 $168.67 $160.26 $146.18 $140.70 $153.97 $128.34 $122.72 I-1 Institutional, supervised environment $180.72 $174.14 $169.28 $161.12 $149.06 $145.04 $161.12 $133.69 $129.43 I-2 Institutional, hospitals $304.80 $298.11 $292.36 $283.95 $268.92 N.P. $277.65 $251.09 N.P. I-2 Institutional, nursing homes $211.20 $204.51 $198.75 $190.34 $177.26 N.P. $184.05 $159.42 N.P. I-3 Institutional, restrained $206.08 $199.38 $193.63 $185.22 $172.62 $166.14 $178.93 $154.78 $146.16 I-4 Institutional, day care facilities $180.72 $174.14 $169.28 $161.12 $149.06 $145.04 $161.12 $133.69 $129.43 M Mercantile $132.23 $127.09 $121.73 $115.92 $106.18 $102.99 $110.26 $91.82 $88.16 R-1 Residential, hotels $182.28 $175.70 $170.83 $162.68 $150.87 $146.84 $162.68 $135.49 $131.23 R-2 Residential, multiple family $152.86 $146.27 $141.41 $133.25 $122.04 $118.01 $133.25 $106.66 $102.41 R-3 Residential, one- and two-family $143.93 $139.97 $136.51 $132.83 $127.95 $124.61 $130.57 $119.73 $112.65 R-4 Residential, care/assisted living facilities $180.72 $174.14 $169.28 $161.12 $149.06 $145.04 $161.12 $133.69 $129.43 S-1 Storage, moderate hazard $100.60 $95.60 $89.63 $85.88 $76.44 $72.62 $81.93 $62.84 $58.35 S-2 Storage, low hazard $99.60 $94.60 $89.63 $84.88 $76.44 $71.62 $80.93 $62.84 $57.35 U Utility, miscellaneous $77.82 $73.48 $69.04 $65.52 $59.23 $55.31 $62.58 $46.83 $44.63

a. Private Garages use Utility, miscellaneous b. Unfinished basements (all use groups) = $15.00 per sq. ft. c. For shell only buildings deduct 20 percent d. N.P. = not permitted e. Data obtained from valuation tables published by the International Code Council (ICC)

c. Residential Structures per the International Residential Code (IRC): Cost per square foot is based on the table listed below:

Residences (single family and townhouses) 250 — 1300 = $98.95 1301— 1400 = $99.94 1401 — 1500 = $100.93 1501— 1600= $101.92 1601 — 1700 = $102.91 1701 — 1800 = $103.90 1801 — 1900 = $104.89 1901— 2000 = $105.88 2001 —2100 = $106.87 2101 — 2200 = $107.86 2201— 2300 = $108.55 2301 —2400 = $109.83 2401 — 2500 = $110.82 2501 — 2600 = $111.81 2601 —2700 = $112.80 2701 — 2800 = $113.79 2801 — 2900 = $114.78 2901 — 3000 = $115.77 3001 & up = $116.76

d. Garages: $37.87 per square foot 41 e. Decks: $5 per square foot

2) Building Fees a. Agricultural Buildings: $6 per $1,000 of valuation or fraction thereof b. Commercial Structures built per the IBC: Fees calculated at a rate of 0.0075 (3/4 of 1%) of the construction valuation i. Minimum fee: $25 c. Residential Structures built per the IRC: Fees calculated at a rate of 0.0075 (3/4 of 1%) of the construction valuation. i. Minimum fee: $25

3) Plan Review Fees a. Agricultural Buildings: No fee b. Commercial Structures: 65% of building permit fee c. Residential Structures: 65% of building permit fee d. Detached garages with no living space, decks/porches for existing structures, and accessory buildings: 15% of building permit fee

4) Plumbing Permit Fees a. Permit Issuance Fee: $10 b. System Fee (does not include $10 issuance fee): i. Agricultural Buildings: $0.025 per square foot ii. Commercial Structures per the International Plumbing Code (IPC): $0.03 per square 37

foot iii. Residential Structures per the IRC: $0.025 per square foot

5) Mechanical Permit Fees a. Permit Issuance Fee: $10 b. System Fee (does not include $10 issuance fee): i. Agricultural Buildings: $0.025 per square foot ii. Commercial Structures per the International Mechanical Code (IMC): $0.03 per square foot iii. Residential Structures per the IRC: $0.025 per square foot

6) Electrical Permit Fees a. Permit Issuance Fee: $10 b. System Fee (does not include $10 issuance fee): i. Agricultural Buildings: $0.025 per square foot ii. Commercial Structures per the National Electric Code (NEC): $0.035 per square foot iii. Residential Structures per the IRC: $0.03 per square foot

7) Alternative Energy Permits: These permits are separate from the permits issued for new construction. These permits include, but are not limited to, hot water, photovoltaic, geo-thermal, and wind generated power. a. Photovoltaic System: $700 b. Geo-Thermal: $500 c. Solar Hot Water: $250 d. Wind Generator: $250 e. Permit Issuance: 10% of review fee

8) Utah State Surcharge: A 1% surcharge on all permits to be collected and remitted to the State of Utah as per UCA 15A-1-209., as amended

9) Other Inspections and Fees a. Inspections outside of normal office hours: $100 per hour (minimum of one hour) b. Re-Inspection fee assessed under the provisions of' Chapter 1 of both the IBC and IRC: $100 per occurrence c. Inspections and permits for which no fee is specifically indicated: $100 d. Additional plan review required by changes, additions, or revisions to approved plans: $100 per hour (minimum of one hour)

PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DEPARTMENT, AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEES

1) Refunds of Fees

Community Development Department Fees and Engineering Department Fees A refund may be given in an amount not to exceed fifty percent of the application fee or fees paid, when the application is withdrawn, in writing, prior to any of the following: 1. Issuance of any notice of public hearing or prior to begin placed on agenda of the County Manager, Planning Commission, Board of Adjustment, or County Council. 2. Completion of the review of any documents or plans submitted with the application. 3. An inspection or site visit requested by the applicant or performed by Staff.

Building Department A refund may be given in an amount not to exceed eighty percent of the building permit fees paid, at the discretion of the Building Official, if work has not commenced on the permitted project and more than six months has not passed since the granting of the permit. Plan review fees are not refundable.

2) Additional Fees

In the event the Director of Community Development, Building Official, or County Engineer determines that a specific project requires additional resources (e.g. specialized consultant, special mapping, etc.) to review extraordinary conditions related to the development proposal, additional fees to cover the cost of these additional resources may be assessed to the applicant.

3) Double Fees

Any person, firm, corporation or any other entity who commences any development activity before obtaining the necessary permits shall be subject to double permit fees for the specified application. The payment of such double fee shall not relieve anyone from fully complying with the requirements of this code in the execution of the work nor from any other penalties prescribed herein.

Summit County shall have the right to issue a stop work order in the event that development activity is commenced or continued without obtaining the necessary permits.

“Development Activity” as used herein includes any of the following activities requiring a permit:

a) Change in use. b) Construction, clearing, filling, excavating, grading, paving, dredging, mining, drilling or otherwise significantly disturbing the soil of a site. c) Building, installing, enlarging, replacing or substantially restoring a structure, impervious surface, or central water system and including the long term storage of materials. d) Erection of a sign. e) Alteration of a historic property for which authorization is required under this title. f) Any activity increasing the need for parking or generating additional traffic. g) Construction, elimination or alteration of a driveway onto a public road. h) Demolition of existing structures.

4) Review and Revision of Fee Schedule

The Community Development Department and Engineering Department shall review the fee schedule every two (2) years and recommend revisions to the fee schedule to ensure that the fees cover the actual cost of processing applications, but is no case exceeds that amount. In no case shall there be longer than a five (5) year period without the review and recommendation of the Community Development Department regarding necessary changes to the fee schedule.

MISCELLANEOUS FEES

Beehive Inspection Fee: $50 per hive

STAFF REPORT

To: County Council From: Mike Kendell, County Engineer Date: December 9, 2020 Subject: Engineering Fee Schedule

Background: Summit County Engineering hired Zions Public Finance to perform fee studies for General Engineering and Stormwater fees.

We have included the reports for General Engineering and Stormwater fees. The studies calculate actual costs to do the fee related services. The actual costs serve as a basis for creating our department fee schedule. Our proposed fees are included in the Ordinance 834 with the other County Departments.

1 SUMMIT COUNTY, UTAH FEE SCHEDULE

Pursuant to Section 17-53-211, Utah Code Annotated, 1953, as amended, a Summit County, Utah Fee Schedule is hereby adopted in book form and by this reference made a part of the Summit County Code.

If paid by credit card, any fees within this Fee Schedule over $5,000.00 shall be subject to a credit card surcharge of 2.5%.

PUBLIC WORKS AND ENGINEERING 1st offense Fine 2nd offense Fine

Re-inspection $100.00

Tracking mud on the road $200.00 $300.00

Steel tracked equipment driven on road $500.00 $750.00

Failure to maintain sediment/erosion control $100.00 $200.00

Illegal excavation, grading, or placement of fill on private property $500.00 $1000.00

Illegal driveway encroachment $200.00 $500.00

Illegal excavation in County right-of-way $500.00 $1000.00

Illicit discharge $500.00 $750.00

Illegal Use of Dumpster or Recycle Dumpster $250.00 $500.00

Other violations not listed $250.00 $500.00

1st offense Fine 2nd offense Fine

Snow deposited in public right-of-way from $50.00 $100.00 private property

Parking within County right-of-way during winter $50.00 $100.00 Season

2 SUMMIT COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEE AND BONDING SCHEDULE

1) Administrative Appeal (If Engineering is involved): $250 Formatted: Font: Not Bold Formatted: No bullets or numbering 2) Board of Adjustment Application: $450 Deleted: 200 a. Board of Adjustment Legal Notice: $150 b. Notification and Publication: $2.00/individual mailed post card notice

3) Conditional Use Permit a. Residential: $750 Deleted: 20 b. Non-Residential: $1,250 Formatted c. Wind Turbine, Solar, Recycling Facility Deleted: 90 /acre of disturbed land¶ i. Residential: $100 If the development parcel is less than one acre, the fee shall be $90… ii. Non-Residential: $500 /acre of disturbed land, and $100 per each additional acre Deleted: 45 a. If the development parcel is less than one acre, the fee shall be $45

4) Condominium Plat: $50 /lot or unit Deleted: 35

5) Construction Plan a. Residential of less than 10 lots: $1,500 Deleted: 250 b. Residential of 10 lots or more: $2,000 Deleted: 550 c. Non-Residential of less than 100,000 square feet of disturbed land: $1,750 Deleted: 400 d. Non-Residential of 100,000 square feet or more of disturbed land: $2,150 Deleted: 750 e. Engineering Construction Inspection Fee i. For projects whose estimated construction cost is less than or equal to $500,000, the fee is 2.0% times the construction cost.* Deleted: 1.5 ii. For projects whose estimated construction cost is more than $500,000, the fee is $10,000 plus Deleted: 7,5 0.15% times the construction cost.* * Construction costs to be included in the fee calculation are all "Civil" Improvements less sewer and water; it does not include building or structure improvement costs. Deleted: 6) Development Agreement: $1,000 Deleted: 85

7) Development Agreement Amendment: a. Public hearing required: $1,000 b. No public hearing required: $750 Formatted Deleted: $85 8) Excavation Encroachments and Structures in the County Right of Way a. Excavation Permit: $150 Base Fee or the first 100 linear feet + $10 per additional 100 linear feet b. Driveway Encroachment Permit i. $200 per Encroachment ii. $100 Re-inspection Fee c. Structure Encroachment Permit: $100 first structure + $10 per additional structure d. Excavation Completion Bond: $400 per 100 feet of trench ($1500 min) e. Asphalt Cut Repair Bond: $500 plus $50 per square foot f. Driveway Bond: 120% of the estimated cost to complete restoration and revegetation g. Road Closure Permit: $100

Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.75", No bullets or numbering 3 9) Final Site Plan a. Residential: $750 Deleted: 5 /lot or unit b. Non-Residential: $800 Formatted Deleted: 5 /acre of disturbed land¶ 10) $50 /lot or unit If the development parcel is less than one acre, the fee shall be Final Subdivision Plat: $5

Deleted: 15 11) Floodplain Development Permit: $500 Formatted: No bullets or numbering

12) Floodplain Determinations: $50 per request Moved (insertion) [1] Formatted: Font: Not Bold 13) Grading, Excavating and Filling on Private Property Formatted: No bullets or numbering a. Grading Permit Deleted: <#>Application Review: $200 per application¶ i. Less than 5,000 cubic yards: $250/application Formatted: No bullets or numbering ii. Equal to or more than 5,000 cubic yards: $450/application b. Revegetation Bond: 120% of the estimated cost to complete revegetation c. Completion Bond: 120% of the estimated cost to complete restoration Formatted Formatted: Font: Not Bold 14) Lot Line Adjustment: $300 Deleted: Formatted: Normal, No bullets or numbering 15) Low Impact Permit Deleted: 40 a. Residential: $300 Deleted: b. Non-Residential: $500 Deleted: 40 c. Wind Turbine, Solar, Recycling Facility Deleted: 130 i. Residential: $100 Deleted: ii. Non-Residential: $250 for the first acre, and $100 per each additional acre 20 a. If the development parcel is less than one acre, the fee shall be $250 Deleted: 65 Deleted: /acre of disturbed land 16) Plat Amendment: Deleted: 65 a. Administrative process: $300 Formatted: Font: Not Bold b. Public Process: $400 Formatted Deleted: 40 17) Preliminary Plan a. Residential: $750 Deleted: 30/lot or unit b. Non-Residential: $800

18) Preliminary Sub Plat a. Residential: $350 Deleted: 30/lot or unit b. Non-Residential: $400 Deleted: 30 /acre of disturbed land¶ If the development parcel is less than one acre, the fee shall be $30 19) Public Hearing Notification and Publication: $2.00/individual notice and actual cost of newspaper Formatted: Normal, No bullets or numbering publication

20) Road Vacation Petition: $425

21) Sketch Plan a) Residential: $20/lot or unit Deleted: 30/lot or unit b) Non-Residential: $300 Deleted: <#>30 /acre of disturbed land¶ 22) SPA Plan a. Residential: $1,250 b. Non-Residential: $1,250 4

23) Special Exception: $400

24) Temporary Use Permit c) Residential: $250 Deleted: 30/lot or unit d) Non-Residential: $350 Formatted: Font: Bold 25) Weed Control Plan Moved up [1]: Floodplain Development¶ Application Review: $200 per application¶ a. Weed Control Plan Review and Inspection (Grading Permits, Construction Plan Permits, Floodplain Determinations: $50 per request Final Site Plan) Deleted: ¶ i. $250 per Plan (includes one plan review and four required inspections) Excavation Encroachments and Structures in the County Right ii. $50 per re-inspection fee of Way¶ Excavation Permit: $150 Base Fee or the first 100 linear feet + $10 b. Weed Bond (Grading Permits, Construction Plan Permits): $300 / disturbed acre per additional 100 linear feet¶ c. Weed Control Fee (Excavation Permits): Driveway Encroachment Permit¶ $200 per Encroachment¶ i. $10 / first 1,000 square feet of disturbed area; plus $100 Re-inspection Fee¶ ii. $0.010 /sq. ft. for area disturbed over first 1,000 sq ft up to 10,000 sq ft of disturbed area; Structure Encroachment Permit: $100 first structure + $10 per additional structure¶ plus $0.006 /sq. ft. for area disturbed over 10,000 sq ft. Excavation Completion Bond: $400 per 100 feet of trench ($1500 min)¶ Asphalt Cut Repair Bond: $500 plus $50 per square foot¶ 26) Stormwater: Erosion Control and Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewers (MS4) Driveway Bond: 120% of the estimated cost to complete restoration a. SWPPP Reviews and revegetation ¶ Road Closure Permit: $100¶ i. Residential > 1 acre: $150 ¶ ii. Residential < 1 acre (if part of a common plan of development): $70 ¶ Excavation, Grading, and Filling on Private Property¶ iii. High Priority: $150 Grading Permit¶ iv. Commercial > 1 acre: $300 Less than 5,000 cubic yards: $150/application¶ Equal to or more than 5,000 cubic yards: $400/application¶ v. Commercial < 1 acre: $250 Revegetation Bond: 120% of the estimated cost to complete b. SWPPP Monthly Inspections revegetation¶ Completion Bond: 120% of the estimated cost to complete i. Residential > 1 acre: $75 restoration ii. Residential < 1 acre (if part of a common plan of development): $60 ¶ iii. High Priority: $175 Formatted: Font: Bold iv. Commercial > 1 acre: $100 Formatted: Normal, Indent: Left: 0", Widow/Orphan control, Adjust space between Latin and Asian text, Adjust v. Commercial < 1 acre: $75 space between Asian text and numbers c. Erosion Control Permit: Deleted: st i. Sites less than 1 acre: ¶ a. $100 per application Deleted: ¶ b. $100 re-inspection fee Formatted: Normal, Indent: Left: 0" ii. Sites of 1 acre or more: a. $200 application + $20/each additional acre b. Re-inspection fee: $100 iii. Bond: 120% of estimated cost to install and maintain

PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DEPARTMENT, AND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEES

1) Refunds of Fees

2) Additional Fees

3) Double Fees

Summit County shall have the right to issue a stop work order in the event that development activity is commenced or continued without obtaining the necessary permits.

“Development Activity” as used herein includes any of the following activities requiring a permit:

4) Review and Revision of Fee Schedule

7 Summit County

Engineering Department

Cost-of-Service Analysis

Zions Public Finance, Inc. November 2020 Summit County – Engineering Department Cost-of-Service Analysis November 2020

Introduction Zions Public Finance, Inc. (ZPFI) was asked to evaluate Summit County’s (the County’s) current Engineering Department fees and recommend a revised fee structure that reasonably reflects the County’s costs associated with providing these services to the community.

Current Fee Structure

Current fees are pulled directly from the Summit County Engineering Fee Schedule. Based on discussions with the County, the existing fee structure (i.e., fee categories shown in the table below) is maintained in this analysis, while actual fees (costs) are updated as part of this study.

TABLE 1: ENGINEERING CURRENT FEE STRUCTURE Application Type Current Fee Administrative Appeal $400 – Engineering Only Ag Exempt - Board of Adjustment Application $200 Board of Adjustment Legal Notice $150 + $2/postcard Bond – Asphalt Cut Repair $500 plus $50/sq. ft. Bond – Completion 120% estimated cost to complete restoration efforts Bond – Driveway Lots having average slopes of less than 10% $250 per Enc Lots having average slopes between 10% and 15% $500 per Enc Lots having average slopes of 15% $2,000 per Enc. Bond – Excavation Completion $400 up to 100 feet ($1500 min); $ Bond – Re-Vegetation 120% estimated cost to complete Bond – SWP3 and ECP 120% estimated cost to implement Bond – Weed $300/acre Conditional Use Permit Residential $20 Non-Residential $90/acre of disturbed land ($90 min.) Wind Turbine, Solar, Recycling Facilities Residential $10 Non-Residential $45/acre of disturbed land ($45 min.) Condominium Plat $35 per lot or unit Construction Plan Residential under 10 lots $250 Residential 10 lots or more $550 Non-residential, max area of disturbance less than $400 100,000 sq. ft. $750 Review Fee Non-residential, max area of disturbance more 1.5% times the construction cost (For project under than 100,000 sq. ft. $500,000) $7,500 Inspection Fee For projects est. const. cost is more than $500,000 0.1% times the construction cost Development Agreement $85 Development Agreement Amendment $85 Driveway Encroachment Permit $200 per Encroachment ($100 re-inspection fee) $150 for the first 100 linear feet Base fee + $10 per Excavation Permit additional 100 linear feet

ZIONS PUBLIC FINANCE 1

Summit County – Engineering Department Cost-of-Service Analysis November 2020

Application Type Current Fee Final Site Plan Residential $5 per lot Non-Residential $5/ acre of disturbed land ($5 min.) Final Subdivision Plat $15 per lot or unit Flood Plain Development Permit $200 Flood Plain Request $50 Grading Permit Less than 5,000 cubic yards $150/app Equal to or more than 5,000 cubic yards $400/app Lot Line Adjustment $40 Low Impact Permit Residential $40 Non-Residential $130 Wind Turbine, Solar, Recycling Facilities Residential $20 Non-Residential $65/acre of disturbed land Plat Amendment $40 Preliminary Plan Residential $30 per lot or unit Non-Residential $30/acre of disturbed land $2.00/individual notice & actual cost of newspaper Public Hearing Notification & Publication publication Road Closure Permit $100 Road Vacation Petition $300 Re-inspection Fee $100 for each re-inspection after the 1st SPA Plan Residential $15 per lot Non-Residential $15/acre of disturbed land ($15 min.) Structure Encroachment $100 first structure + $10 per add. Structure Transportation Impact Fee SFD $1,766 $1,924.38 per PM peak trip generated by Commercial development

Methodology ZPFI’s approach to calculating costs was based on the following tasks and steps:

• Step 1: Review Department Budgets; Gather Initial Data Regarding Employees per Department and Labor Costs • Step 2: Prepare Spreadsheet Template • Step 3: Coordinate with the Engineering Department on Direct Costs • Step 4: Allocate Indirect Costs • Step 5: Calculate Total Cost Per Minute • Step 6: Calculate Costs per Service • Step 7: Quality Control

ZIONS PUBLIC FINANCE 2

Summit County – Engineering Department Cost-of-Service Analysis November 2020

Step 1: Review Department Budgets; Gather Initial Data Regarding Employees per Department and Labor Costs ZPFI first reviewed the budgets for the Engineering Department. This step identified overall labor costs, as well as the number of employees and employee positions in each department.

Step 2: Preparation of Spreadsheet Template ZPFI created a financial model that allowed for the Engineering Department to enter the amount of time spent on each fee-related service, by employee position.

Step 3: Coordination with Departments on Direct Costs From the information gathered from the various departments, ZPFI prepared a detailed spreadsheet that allowed for input regarding the actual time spent by various positions in providing each service. ZPFI then followed up with each department to clarify data and resolve any potentially conflicting information.

Step 4: Allocation of Indirect Costs Indirect costs arise in two areas:

1. Engineering employee time not directly spent on fee-related services, but in activities such as meetings, training, etc. 2. Certain County departments, such as clerk, treasurer, auditor, etc., have indirect costs that need to be apportioned among all departments and fees.

Engineering Department Indirect Cost Allocation. Costs are allocated within the Engineering Department for employee time spent on activities that are not directly fee-related, such as training, meetings, etc. For example, an employee who provides engineering reviews may also attend department meetings or training workshops. A portion of these indirect costs can be allocated to the unit costs associated with providing services for which fees are charged.

County Overhead Indirect Cost Allocation. There are also indirect costs associated with other County departments such as administration, treasurer, attorney, etc. These costs have also been allocated and added to the direct unit costs. The indirect costs from Summit County departments that are allocated to all County departments include the following:

• Council • Administration • Sustainability • Auditor • Clerk • Treasurer • Attorney • Risk Management • Information Technology • Coalville Area • Kimball Junction Area • Kamas Area • Non-Departmental • Personnel

ZIONS PUBLIC FINANCE 3

Summit County – Engineering Department Cost-of-Service Analysis November 2020

These departments include 51 FTEs at a cost of $8,342,019 which is spread among the remaining departments in the County representing 2581 FTEs. Of these employees, 37 (14.3411 percent2) are located in the Public Works department which means the total amount of indirect cost attributed to the Public Works department is $1,196,335.99.3 This produces a total indirect non-department cost-per- minute of $0.264 for County overhead.

TABLE 2: INDIRECT COUNTY OVERHEAD COST ALLOCATION Total Indirect Non- Public Works Share Total Indirect Non- Indirect Non-Dept. Number of FTES Dept. Salary of FTEs Dept. Cost Cost/Minute $8,342,019 14.3411% $1,196,336 37 $0.26

Step 5: Calculation of Total Cost per Minute The aforementioned costs were totaled to determine the total cost-per-minute for all employees involved in the engineering fee process as detailed later in this report.

Step 6: Calculation of Actual Costs This step calculates the total cost per service by multiplying the time spent by the fully loaded cost per minute.

Step 7: Quality Control Time estimates were reviewed with department staff in order to provide the most accurate numbers possible.

Cost-of-Service Analysis

Direct Costs Direct costs are incurred by those individuals who directly handle fee-related services. While the “average” time spent for similar services can vary depending on a variety of factors, this report is based on an “average” time spent per individual service, as shown in the table below.

TABLE 3: MINUTES SPENT BY POSITION PER ONE UNIT OF SERVICE Code County Senior Public Works Engineer II Admin Enforcement Engineer Engineer Inspector Hourly Cost $41.93 $78.91 $57.55 $64.53 $25.20 $48.94 Direct Cost per Minute $0.70 $1.32 $0.96 $1.08 $0.42 $0.82

Administrative Appeal 240 240 240 Ag Exempt 30 Board of Adjustment 400 60 Application Board of Adjustment Legal 60 60 Notice Conditional Use Permit Residential 240 240 240 Non-Residential 180 360 360

1 The County has a total of 309 FTEs. Therefore, 309 – 51 = 258 2 37 / 258 = .143411 or 14.3411% 3 $8,342,019 * .143411 = $1,196,335.99 4 $1,196,335.99 / (37 * 2080 * 60) = $0.26

ZIONS PUBLIC FINANCE 4

Summit County – Engineering Department Cost-of-Service Analysis November 2020

Code County Senior Public Works Engineer II Admin Enforcement Engineer Engineer Inspector Wind Turbine, Solar, or Recycling Facility Residential 120 240 240 Non-Residential 120 240 240 Condominium Plat 20 20 20 Construction Plan Residential: Under 10 lots 360 480 480 Residential: 10 or more lots 400 600 600 Non-Residential: Disturbance 360 480 480 <100,000 sq. ft Non-Residential: Disturbance >100,000 sq. ft Construction 400 600 600 cost <$500,000 Non-Residential: Disturbance < 100,000 sq. ft. Construction 8,640 cost >$500,000 Development Agreement 300 300 300 Development Agreement

Amendment Public hearing required 360 360 360 No public hearing required 300 300 300 Final Site Plan Residential 120 240 240 Non-Residential 120 240 240 Final Site Plan Amendment 90 180 180 Final Subdivision Plat 60 120 120 Flood Plain Development Permit 300 Flood Plain Request 30 Grading Permit >5,000 cubic yards 180 60 30 30 >=5,000 cubic yards 225 75 37.5 37.5 Lot Line Adjustment 200 80 80 Low Impact Permit Residential 216 216 216 Non-Residential 162 324 324 Wind Turbine, Solar, or

Recycling Facility Residential 60 90 90 Non-Residential 60 180 180 Plat Amendment Administrative process 144 48 48 Public Process 144 48 48 Preliminary Plan Residential 216 216 216 Non-Residential 162 324 324 Preliminary Sub Plat Residential 84 168 168 Non-Residential 84 168 168 Road Closure Permit 30 60 Road vacation Petition 180 60 60 Re-inspection Fee 100 Sign Permit 20 30 20 Sketch Plan Residential 60 120 120 Non-Residential 60 120 120 SPA Plan

ZIONS PUBLIC FINANCE 5

Summit County – Engineering Department Cost-of-Service Analysis November 2020

Code County Senior Public Works Engineer II Admin Enforcement Engineer Engineer Inspector Residential 300 300 300 Non-Residential 300 300 300 Structure Encroachment 90 Special Exception 120 120 120 Temporary Use Permit Residential 60 120 120 Non-Residential 60 120 120

The following table shows the total units of service provided during the past year, by service type.

TABLE 4: TOTAL SERVICE UNITS 2019 Engineering Fees Total Units 2019 Administrative Appeal 1 Ag Exempt 12 Board of Adjustment Application 6 Board of Adjustment Legal Notice 6 Conditional Use Permit Residential 11 Non-Residential 11 Wind Turbine, Solar, or Recycling Facility Residential 0 Non-Residential 0 Condominium Plat 6 Construction Plan Residential: Under 10 lots 7 Residential: 10 or more lots 8 Non-Residential: Disturbance <100,000 sq. ft 7 Non-Residential: Disturbance >100,000 sq. ft Construction cost <$500,000 8 Non-Residential: Disturbance < 100,000 sq. ft. Construction cost >$500,000 0 Development Agreement 5 Development Agreement Amendment Public hearing required 4 No public hearing required 4 Final Site Plan Residential 11 Non-Residential 10 Final Site Plan Amendment 4 Final Subdivision Plat 17 Flood Plain Development Permit 16 Flood Plain Request 4 Grading Permit >5,000 cubic yards 6 >=5,000 cubic yards 20 Lot Line Adjustment 14 Low Impact Permit Residential 27 Non-Residential 22 Wind Turbine, Solar, or Recycling Facility Residential 0 Non-Residential 0 Plat Amendment Administrative process 6 Public Process 18

ZIONS PUBLIC FINANCE 6

Summit County – Engineering Department Cost-of-Service Analysis November 2020

Engineering Fees Total Units 2019 Preliminary Plan Residential 4 Non-Residential 3 Preliminary Sub Plat Residential 3 Non-Residential 2 Road Closure Permit 55 Road vacation Petition 1 Re-inspection Fee 20 Sign Permit 4 Sketch Plan Residential 3 Non-Residential 3 SPA Plan Residential 1 Non-Residential 0 Structure Encroachment 10 Special Exception 2 Temporary Use Permit Residential 8 Non-Residential 22

Based on the above table of minutes worked per service unit, as well as the total number of units provided for each service type, the following direct costs were calculated per unit of service and for all units served during a one-year period.

TABLE 5: DIRECT COST CALCULATIONS Cost per Unit of Service Total Annual Cost Engineering Fees (direct costs only) (direct costs only) Administrative Appeal $803.96 $803.96 Ag Exempt $39.45 $473.44 Board of Adjustment Application $358.43 $2,150.61 Board of Adjustment Legal Notice $67.13 $402.77 Conditional Use Permit Residential $803.96 $8,843.58 Non-Residential $969.22 $10,661.46 Wind Turbine, Solar, or Recycling Facility Residential $646.15 $0.00 Non-Residential $646.15 $0.00 Condominium Plat $67.00 $401.98 Construction Plan Residential: Under 10 lots $1,450.11 $10,150.78 Residential: 10 or more lots $1,746.88 $13,975.07 Non-Residential: Disturbance <100,000 sq. ft $1,450.11 $10,150.78 Non-Residential: Disturbance >100,000 sq. ft Construction cost $1,746.88 $13,975.07 <$500,000 Non-Residential: Disturbance < 100,000 sq. ft. Construction cost $7,047.33 $0.00 >$500,000 Development Agreement $1,004.95 $5,024.76 Development Agreement Amendment Public hearing required $1,205.94 $4,823.77 No public hearing required $1,004.95 $4,019.81 Final Site Plan Residential $646.15 $7,107.64

ZIONS PUBLIC FINANCE 7

Summit County – Engineering Department Cost-of-Service Analysis November 2020

Cost per Unit of Service Total Annual Cost Engineering Fees (direct costs only) (direct costs only) Non-Residential $646.15 $6,461.49 Final Site Plan Amendment $484.61 $1,938.45 Final Subdivision Plat $323.07 $5,492.27 Flood Plain Development Permit $394.53 $6,312.52 Flood Plain Request $39.45 $157.81 Grading Permit >5,000 cubic yards $265.74 $1,594.42 >=5,000 cubic yards $332.17 $6,643.41 Lot Line Adjustment $425.80 $5,961.21 Low Impact Permit Residential $723.57 $19,536.28 Non-Residential $872.30 $19,190.63 Wind Turbine, Solar, or Recycling Facility Residential $262.03 $0.00 Non-Residential $445.16 $0.00 Plat Amendment Administrative process $287.04 $1,722.26 Public Process $287.04 $5,166.77 Preliminary Plan Residential $723.57 $2,894.26 Non-Residential $872.30 $2,616.90 Preliminary Sub Plat Residential $452.30 $1,356.91 Non-Residential $452.30 $904.61 Road Closure Permit $81.21 $4,466.37 Road vacation Petition $358.80 $358.80 Re-inspection Fee $69.88 $1,397.64 Sign Permit $76.59 $306.35 Sketch Plan Residential $323.07 $969.22 Non-Residential $323.07 $969.22 SPA Plan Residential $1,004.95 $1,004.95 Non-Residential $1,004.95 $0.00 Structure Encroachment $73.41 $734.10 Special Exception $401.98 $803.96 Temporary Use Permit Residential $323.07 $2,584.60 Non-Residential $323.07 $7,107.64

Additional time that is not directly billable can be allocated to the cost of providing these services. This additional time is for activities such as training and benefits the Engineering Department. Therefore, an allocation factor is made for employees to fairly allocate their additional time to each service that they provide.

TABLE 6: BILLABLE PERCENT OF TIME AND ALLOCATION FACTOR Code Public Works County Engineer Engineer II Senior Engineer Admin Enforcement Inspector Total Billable 10,340 52,342 59,098 60,708 360 4,200 Minutes Total Billable Hours 172.33 872.37 984.97 1,011.80 6.00 70.00 Billable Percent of 8% 42% 47% 49% 0.3% 3% Year

ZIONS PUBLIC FINANCE 8

Summit County – Engineering Department Cost-of-Service Analysis November 2020

Another cost of doing business for the Engineering Department is the cost of supplies and vehicles used for fee-related purposes. The County has identified specific line items and proportionate costs allocated to the Engineering Department. The table below outlines the supply expenses allocated.

TABLE 7: ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT SUPPLY COSTS Expense Category Engineering Supply Expenses Travel/Training $2,000 Maintenance Contracts $160 Equipment $1,110 Cell Phone $1,850 Fuel $5,180 Total Engineering Supply Expenses $10,300

In order to allocate the cost of supplies, the total cost is divided by the total minutes worked by the six full-time employees in the Engineering Department. There are also vehicle costs that have been allocated to the Engineering Department. These costs vary by employee because some Engineering Department employees share vehicles, and some are assigned their own vehicle. The table below shows the combined supply and vehicle cost per minute by employee.

TABLE 8: TOTAL SUPPLY AND VEHICLE COST PER MINUTE Code County Senior Public Works Engineer II Admin Enforcement Engineer Engineer Inspector Supply and Vehicle Cost Per $0.06 $0.05 $0.05 $0.05 $0.01 $0.06 Minute

As outlined in Table 2, County overhead adds another $0.26 per minute.

TABLE 9: INDIRECT COSTS – COUNTY OVERHEAD Description Amount County Indirect Cost Allocation $1,196,335 Total Minutes Worked in Public Works Department 4,617,600 County Overhead Indirect Costs per Minute $0.26

Total cost for each employee involved with the fee-related services is as follows:

TABLE 10: TOTAL COST PER MINUTE Code County Senior Public Works Engineer II Admin Enforcement Engineer Engineer Inspector Direct Labor Cost per $41.93 $78.91 $57.55 $64.53 $25.20 $48.94 Hour Direct Labor Cost per $0.70 $1.32 $0.96 $1.08 $0.42 $0.82 Minute Training Cost per $0.03 $0.07 $0.05 $0.05 $0.05 $0.03 minute Supply and Vehicle Cost $0.06 $0.05 $0.05 $0.05 $0.01 $0.06 Per Minute Overhead per Minute $0.26 $0.26 $0.26 $0.26 $0.26 $0.26 TOTAL Cost per Minute $1.06 $1.69 $1.31 $1.44 $0.74 $1.17

ZIONS PUBLIC FINANCE 9

Summit County – Engineering Department Cost-of-Service Analysis November 2020

The total cost per minute for each employee is then multiplied by the total time spent per service, by each employee, as shown previously in Table 3.

This results in total costs of $553,830.42 for the Engineering Department as shown in the table below.

TABLE 11: TOTAL COST PER UNIT AND TOTAL ANNUAL COST Engineering Fees Units per Year Per Unit Total Annual Cost

Administrative Appeal 1 $1,064.46 $1,064.46 Ag Exempt 12 $50.60 $607.26 Board of Adjustment Application 6 $523.45 $3,140.68 Board of Adjustment Legal Notice 6 $107.84 $647.02 Conditional Use Permit Residential 11 $1,064.46 $11,709.02 Non-Residential 11 $1,293.06 $14,223.61 Wind Turbine, Solar, or Recycling Facility Residential 0 $862.04 $0.00 Non-Residential 0 $862.04 $0.00 Condominium Plat 6 $88.70 $532.23 Construction Plan Residential: Under 10 lots 7 $1,926.49 $13,485.45 Residential: 10 or more lots 8 $2,323.77 $18,590.20 Non-Residential: Disturbance <100,000 sq. ft 7 $1,926.49 $13,485.45 Non-Residential: Disturbance >100,000 sq. ft 8 $2,323.77 $18,590.20 Construction cost <$500,000 Non-Residential: Disturbance < 100,000 sq. ft. 0 $10,129.86 $0.00 Construction cost >$500,000 Development Agreement 5 $1,330.57 $6,652.85 Development Agreement Amendment Public hearing required 4 $1,596.68 $6,386.74 No public hearing required 4 $1,330.57 $5,322.28 Final Site Plan Residential 11 $862.04 $9,482.40 Non-Residential 10 $862.04 $8,620.37 Final Site Plan Amendment 4 $646.53 $2,586.11 Final Subdivision Plat 17 $431.02 $7,327.31 Flood Plain Development Permit 16 $506.05 $8,096.79 Flood Plain Request 4 $50.60 $202.42 Grading Permit >5,000 cubic yards 6 $373.67 $2,242.01 >=5,000 cubic yards 20 $467.09 $9,341.72 Lot Line Adjustment 14 $557.24 $7,801.34 Low Impact Permit Residential 27 $958.01 $25,866.29 Non-Residential 22 $1,163.75 $25,602.49 Wind Turbine, Solar, or Recycling Facility Residential 0 $348.57 $0.00 Non-Residential 0 $595.92 $0.00 Plat Amendment Administrative process 6 $374.83 $2,248.96 Public Process 18 $374.83 $6,746.89 Preliminary Plan Residential 4 $958.01 $3,832.04 Non-Residential 3 $1,163.75 $3,491.25 Preliminary Sub Plat Residential 3 $603.43 $1,810.28

ZIONS PUBLIC FINANCE 10

Summit County – Engineering Department Cost-of-Service Analysis November 2020

Engineering Fees Units per Year Per Unit Total Annual Cost Non-Residential 2 $603.43 $1,206.85 Road Closure Permit 55 $113.41 $6,237.30 Road vacation Petition 1 $468.53 $468.53 Re-inspection Fee 20 $105.56 $2,111.19 Sign Permit 4 $101.84 $407.34 Sketch Plan Residential 3 $431.02 $1,293.06 Non-Residential 3 $431.02 $1,293.06 SPA Plan Residential 1 $1,330.57 $1,330.57 Non-Residential (adjustable rate by acre) 0 $1,330.57 $0.00 Structure Encroachment 10 $105.52 $1,055.19 Special Exception 2 $532.23 $1,064.46 Temporary Use Permit Residential 8 $431.02 $3,448.15 Non-Residential 22 $431.02 $9,482.40 TOTAL $553,830.42

The table below breaks out costs by employee and results in the same total cost as shown in the table above.

TABLE 12: TOTAL COST PER EMPLOYEE Public Code County Senior Engineering Fees Engineer II Admin Works Enforcement Engineer Engineer Inspector Administrative Appeal $0.00 $404.84 $315.14 $344.47 $0.00 $0.00 Ag Exempt $0.00 $607.26 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Board of Adjustment $2,533.43 $607.26 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Application Board of Adjustment Legal $380.01 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $267.01 $0.00 Notice Conditional Use Permit Residential $0.00 $4,453.23 $3,466.57 $3,789.21 $0.00 $0.00 Non-Residential $0.00 $3,339.93 $5,199.86 $5,683.82 $0.00 $0.00 Wind Turbine, Solar, or

Recycling Facility Residential $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Non-Residential $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Condominium Plat $0.00 $202.42 $157.57 $172.24 $0.00 $0.00 Construction Plan Residential: Under 10 lots $0.00 $4,250.82 $4,412.00 $4,822.63 $0.00 $0.00 Residential: 10 or more lots $0.00 $5,397.86 $6,302.86 $6,889.48 $0.00 $0.00 Non-Residential: $0.00 $4,250.82 $4,412.00 $4,822.63 $0.00 $0.00 Disturbance <100,000 sq. ft Non-Residential: Disturbance >100,000 sq. ft $0.00 $5,397.86 $6,302.86 $6,889.48 $0.00 $0.00 Construction cost <$500,000 Non-Residential: Disturbance < 100,000 sq. ft. $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Construction cost >$500,000 Development Agreement $0.00 $2,530.25 $1,969.64 $2,152.96 $0.00 $0.00 Development Agreement

Amendment Public hearing required $0.00 $2,429.04 $1,890.86 $2,066.84 $0.00 $0.00 No public hearing required $0.00 $2,024.20 $1,575.72 $1,722.37 $0.00 $0.00

ZIONS PUBLIC FINANCE 11

Summit County – Engineering Department Cost-of-Service Analysis November 2020

Public Code County Senior Engineering Fees Engineer II Admin Works Enforcement Engineer Engineer Inspector Final Site Plan Residential $0.00 $2,226.62 $3,466.57 $3,789.21 $0.00 $0.00 Non-Residential $0.00 $2,024.20 $3,151.43 $3,444.74 $0.00 $0.00 Final Site Plan Amendment $0.00 $607.26 $945.43 $1,033.42 $0.00 $0.00 Final Subdivision Plat $0.00 $1,720.57 $2,678.72 $2,928.03 $0.00 $0.00 Flood Plain Development $0.00 $8,096.79 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Permit Flood Plain Request $0.00 $202.42 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Grading Permit >5,000 cubic yards $1,140.04 $607.26 $236.36 $258.36 $0.00 $0.00 >=5,000 cubic yards $4,750.17 $2,530.25 $984.82 $1,076.48 $0.00 $0.00 Lot Line Adjustment $0.00 $4,723.13 $1,470.67 $1,607.54 $0.00 $0.00 Low Impact Permit Residential $0.00 $9,837.60 $7,657.98 $8,370.71 $0.00 $0.00 Non-Residential $0.00 $6,011.87 $9,359.75 $10,230.87 $0.00 $0.00 Wind Turbine, Solar, or $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Recycling Facility Residential $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Non-Residential $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Plat Amendment Administrative process $0.00 $1,457.42 $378.17 $413.37 $0.00 $0.00 Public Process $0.00 $4,372.27 $1,134.52 $1,240.11 $0.00 $0.00 Preliminary Plan Residential $0.00 $1,457.42 $1,134.52 $1,240.11 $0.00 $0.00 Non-Residential $0.00 $819.80 $1,276.33 $1,395.12 $0.00 $0.00 Preliminary Sub Plat Residential $0.00 $425.08 $661.80 $723.39 $0.00 $0.00 Non-Residential $0.00 $283.39 $441.20 $482.26 $0.00 $0.00 Road Closure Permit $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $2,368.26 $0.00 $3,869.04 Road vacation Petition $0.00 $303.63 $78.79 $86.12 $0.00 $0.00 Re-inspection Fee $2,111.19 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Sign Permit $0.00 $134.95 $157.57 $114.82 $0.00 $0.00 Sketch Plan Residential $0.00 $303.63 $472.71 $516.71 $0.00 $0.00 Non-Residential $0.00 $303.63 $472.71 $516.71 $0.00 $0.00 SPA Plan Residential $0.00 $506.05 $393.93 $430.59 $0.00 $0.00 Non-Residential $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Structure Encroachment $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,055.19 Special Exception $0.00 $404.84 $315.14 $344.47 $0.00 $0.00 Temporary Use Permit Residential $0.00 $809.68 $1,260.57 $1,377.90 $0.00 $0.00 Non-Residential $0.00 $2,226.62 $3,466.57 $3,789.21 $0.00 $0.00

The County may choose to enact lower-than-maximum fees, or to gradually phase in fee increases, in order to avoid large fee increases. The purpose of this study is to calculate the actual cost of providing engineering services.

ZIONS PUBLIC FINANCE 12

Summit County

Storm Water Department

Cost-of-Service Analysis

Zions Public Finance, Inc. November 2020

Summit County – Storm Water Department Cost-of-Service Analysis

November 2020

Introduction Zions Public Finance, Inc. (ZPFI) was asked to evaluate Summit County’s (“the County”) current Storm Water services provided by staff and recommend a fee structure that reasonably reflects the County’s costs associated with providing these services to the community. Therefore, this analysis evaluates the costs involved for the County to provide storm water services so that the County may capture these costs through the creation of new fees.

Methodology ZPFI’s approach to calculating costs is based on the following tasks and steps:

• Step 1: Review Department Budget; Gather Initial Data Regarding Employees, Labor Costs and Time Spent per Unit of Service • Step 2: Prepare Spreadsheet Template • Step 3: Coordinate with Departments on Direct Costs • Step 4: Allocate Indirect Costs • Step 5: Calculate Total Cost Per Minute • Step 6: Calculate Costs per Service • Step 7: Quality Control

Step 1: Review Department Budgets; Gather Initial Data Regarding Employees per Department and Labor Costs ZPFI first reviewed the budget for the Storm Water Department. This step identified overall labor costs, as well as the number of employees and employee positions in each department.

Step 2: Preparation of Spreadsheet Template ZPFI created a financial model that allowed for the Storm Water Department to enter the amount of time spent on each fee-related service, by employee position.

Step 3: Coordination with Departments on Direct Costs ZPFI also worked with other departments that provide direct services related to storm water. From the information gathered regarding the actual time spent by various positions, information was added to the spreadsheet. ZPFI then followed up with each department to clarify data and resolve any potentially conflicting information.

Step 4: Allocation of Indirect Costs Indirect costs arise in two areas:

1. Storm Water employee time not directly spent on fee-related services, but in activities such as meetings, training, etc. 2. Certain County departments, such as clerk, treasurer, auditor, etc., have indirect costs that need to be apportioned among all departments.

Storm Water Department Indirect Cost Allocation. Costs are allocated within the Storm Water Department for employee time spent on activities that are not directly fee-related, such as training, meetings, etc. For example, an employee who conducts monthly storm water inspections may also

ZIONS PUBLIC FINANCE 1

Summit County – Storm Water Department Cost-of-Service Analysis

November 2020

attend department meetings or training workshops. A portion of these indirect costs can be allocated to the unit costs associated with providing services for which fees are charged.

TABLE 1: INDIRECT COUNTY OVERHEAD COST ALLOCATION Total Indirect Non- Public Works Share Total Indirect Non- Indirect Non-Dept. Number of FTES Dept. Salary of FTEs Dept. Cost Cost/Minute $8,342,019 14.3411% $1,196,336 37 $0.26

Step 5: Calculation of Total Cost per Minute The aforementioned costs were totaled to determine the total cost-per-minute for all employees involved in the storm water inspection process as detailed later in this report.

Step 6: Calculation of Actual Costs This step calculates the total cost per service by multiplying the time spent by the fully loaded cost per minute.

1 The County has a total of 309 FTEs. Therefore, 309 – 51 = 258 2 37 / 258 = 0.143411 or 14.3411% 3 $8,342,019 * 0.143411 = $1,196,335.99 4 $1,196,335.99 / (37 * 2080 * 60) = $0.26

ZIONS PUBLIC FINANCE 2

Summit County – Storm Water Department Cost-of-Service Analysis

November 2020

Step 7: Quality Control Estimates of time spent were reviewed with department staff in order to provide the most accurate numbers possible.

Cost-of-Service Analysis

Direct Costs Direct costs are incurred by those individuals who directly handle fee-related services. While the “average” time spent for similar services can vary depending on a variety of factors, this report is based on the “average” time spent per individual service, as shown in the table below.

TABLE 2: MINUTES SPENT BY POSITION PER ONE UNIT OF SERVICE Storm Water Storm Water County Senior Engineer Engineer II Code Enforcer Manager Inspector Engineer Hourly Cost $47.08 $30.31 $78.91 $64.53 $57.55 $41.93 Direct Cost per Minute $0.78 $0.51 $1.32 $1.08 $0.96 $0.70

SWPPP Reviews Residential > 1 acre 105 35 15 Residential < 1 acre (if a part of a common plan of 50 8 15 development) High priority 105 35 2 Commercial > 1 acre 105 35 16 52.5 52.5 Commercial < 1 acre 75 20 16 52.5 52.5 SWPPP Monthly

Inspections Residential > 1 acre 20 90 Residential < 1 acre (if a part of a common plan of 10 70 development) High Priority 40 180 Commercial > 1 acre 20 90 Commercial < 1 acre 15 70 Erosion Control Permit 280 Long Term Stormwater Management Plan (LTSWMP) Residential > 1-acre part 300 150 of a current LTSWMP Residential > 1 acre NOT a 480 300 10 part of a current LTSWMP Residential < 1 acre apart 300 150 of a current LTSWMP

The following table shows the total units of service provided during the past year, by service type.

TABLE 3: TOTAL SERVICE UNITS 2019 Storm Water Fees Total Units 2019 SWPPP Reviews Residential > 1 acre 5 Residential < 1 acre (if a part of a common plan of development) 38 High priority 9 Commercial > 1 acre 25

ZIONS PUBLIC FINANCE 3

Summit County – Storm Water Department Cost-of-Service Analysis

November 2020

Storm Water Fees Total Units 2019 Commercial < 1 acre 5 SWPPP Monthly Inspections Residential > 1 acre 60 Residential < 1 acre (if a part of a common plan of development) 456 High Priority 108 Commercial > 1 acre 300 Commercial < 1 acre 60 Erosion Control Permit 100 Long Term Stormwater Management Plan (LTSWMP) Residential > 1-acre part of a current LTSWMP 4 Residential > 1 acre NOT a part of a current LTSWMP 1 Residential < 1 acre apart of a current LTSWMP 37 Commercial > 1 acre apart of a current LTSWMP 30 Commercial > 1 acre NOT a part of a current LTSWMP 4 Commercial < 1 acre apart of a current LTSWMP 4

Based on the above table of minutes worked per service unit, as well as the total number of units provided for each service type, the following direct costs were calculated per unit of service.

TABLE 4: DIRECT COST CALCULATIONS Cost per Unit of Service Total Annual Cost Storm Water Fees (direct costs only) (direct costs only) SWPPP Reviews Residential > 1 acre $110.55 $552.74 Residential < 1 acre (if a part of a common plan of $53.75 $2,042.66 development) High priority $102.70 $924.26 Commercial > 1 acre $227.93 $5,698.27 Commercial < 1 acre $196.81 $984.07 SWPPP Monthly Inspections Residential > 1 acre $61.16 $3,669.59 Residential < 1 acre (if a part of a common plan of $43.21 $19,703.71 development) High Priority $122.32 $13,210.54 Commercial > 1 acre $61.16 $18,347.97 Commercial < 1 acre $47.13 $2,827.98 Erosion Control Permit $195.67 $19,566.98 Long Term Stormwater Management Plan (LTSWMP) Residential > 1-acre part of a current LTSWMP $311.16 $1,244.65 Residential > 1 acre NOT a part of a current LTSWMP $535.16 $535.16 Residential < 1 acre apart of a current LTSWMP $311.16 $11,512.97 Commercial > 1 acre apart of a current LTSWMP $495.85 $14,875.48 Commercial > 1 acre NOT a part of a current LTSWMP $665.78 $2,663.13 Commercial < 1 acre apart of a current LTSWMP $361.41 $1,445.64 TOTAL $119,805.78

ZIONS PUBLIC FINANCE 4

Summit County – Storm Water Department Cost-of-Service Analysis

November 2020

Additional time that is not directly billable can be allocated to the cost of providing these services. This additional time is for activities such as training and benefits the Storm Water department. Therefore, an allocation factor is made for employees to fairly allocate their additional time to each service that they provide.

TABLE 5: BILLABLE PERCENT OF TIME AND ALLOCATION FACTOR Storm Water Storm Water County Senior Engineer Engineer II Code Enforcer Manager Inspector Engineer Total Billable 53,110 102,479 1,238 2,315 2,315 28,655 Minutes Total Billable Hours 885.17 1,707.98 20.63 38.58 38.58 477.58 Billable Percent of 43% 82% 1% 2% 2% 23% Year

Another cost of doing business for the Storm Water Department is the cost of supplies, including vehicles used in the review and inspection process. The Storm Water’s expenses are covered by the Engineering budget. From this budget, the County has identified specific line items and proportionate costs allocated to the Storm Water Department. The table below outlines the expenses allocated to the department.

TABLE 6: STORM WATER DEPARTMENT SUPPLIES COSTS Expense Category Storm Water Supply Expenses Travel/Training $500 Maintenance Contracts $240 Equipment $375 Cell Phone $650 Fuel $1,820 Total Storm Water Supply Expenses $3,585

In order to allocate the cost of supplies, the total cost is divided by the total minutes worked by the six full-time employees in the Storm Water Department. Costs for vehicles have also been allocated to the Storm Water Department. These costs vary by employee because some Storm Water Department employees share vehicles, and some are assigned their own vehicle. The table below shows the combined supply and vehicle cost per minute by employee.

TABLE 7: TOTAL SUPPLY AND VEHICLE COST PER MINUTE Storm Water Storm Water County Senior Engineer Engineer II Code Enforcer Manager Inspector Engineer Supply and Vehicle $0.03 $0.03 $0.04 $0.04 $0.04 $0.05 Cost Per Minute

As outlined previously in Table 1, county overhead adds another $0.26 per minute.

TABLE 8: INDIRECT COSTS – COUNTY OVERHEAD Description Amount County Indirect Cost Allocation $1,196,335 Total Minutes Worked in Public Works Department 4,617,600 County Overhead Indirect Costs per Minute $0.26

ZIONS PUBLIC FINANCE 5

Summit County – Storm Water Department Cost-of-Service Analysis

November 2020

Total costs for each employee involved with the building inspection process is as follows:

TABLE 9: TOTAL COST PER MINUTE Storm Water Storm Water County Senior Engineer Engineer II Code Enforcer Manager Inspector Engineer Direct Labor Cost $47.08 $30.31 $78.91 $64.53 $57.55 $41.93 per Hour Direct Labor Cost $0.78 $0.51 $1.32 $1.08 $0.96 $0.70 per Minute Training Cost Per $0.08 $0.03 $0.04 $0.02 $0.02 $0.02 Minute Supply and Vehicle $0.03 $0.03 $0.04 $0.04 $0.04 $0.05 cost per Minute Overhead per $0.26 $0.26 $0.26 $0.26 $0.26 $0.26 Minute TOTAL Cost per $1.15 $0.83 $1.65 $1.39 $1.27 $1.03 Minute

The total cost per minute for each employee is then multiplied by the total time spent per service, by each employee, as shown in Table 2 above.

This results in total costs of $183,716.01 for the Storm Water Department as shown in the table below.

TABLE 10: TOTAL COST PER UNIT AND TOTAL ANNUAL COST Storm Water Fees Units per Year Per Unit Total Annual Cost SWPPP Reviews Residential > 1 acre 5 $165.60 $828.01 Residential < 1 acre (if a part of a common plan 38 $79.77 $3,031.08 of development) High priority 9 $153.50 $1,381.47 Commercial > 1 acre 25 $316.27 $7,906.75 Commercial < 1 acre 5 $269.22 $1,346.12 SWPPP Monthly Inspections Residential > 1 acre 60 $97.52 $5,850.99 Residential < 1 acre (if a part of a common plan 456 $69.43 $31,660.51 of development) High Priority 108 $195.03 $21,063.57 Commercial > 1 acre 300 $97.52 $29,254.96 Commercial < 1 acre 60 $75.20 $4,512.28 Erosion Control Permit 100 $287.70 $28,770.27 Long Term Stormwater Management Plan

(LTSWMP) Residential > 1-acre part of a current LTSWMP 4 $470.46 $1,881.84 Residential > 1 acre NOT a part of a current 1 $812.63 $812.63 LTSWMP Residential < 1 acre apart of a current LTSWMP 37 $470.46 $17,407.02 Commercial > 1 acre apart of a current LTSWMP 30 $729.93 $21,897.79 Commercial > 1 acre NOT a part of a current 4 $992.53 $3,970.13 LTSWMP Commercial < 1 acre apart of a current LTSWMP 4 $535.15 $2,140.60 TOTAL $183,716.01

ZIONS PUBLIC FINANCE 6

Summit County – Storm Water Department Cost-of-Service Analysis

November 2020

The table below breaks out costs by employee and results in the same total cost as shown in the table above.

TABLE 11: TOTAL COST PER EMPLOYEE Storm Water Storm Water County Senior Storm Water Fees Engineer II Code Enforcer Manager Inspector Engineer Engineer SWPPP Reviews Residential > 1 acre $606.24 $144.71 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $77.06 Residential < 1 acre (if a part of a common plan of $2,194.02 $251.38 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $585.68 development) High priority $1,091.24 $260.48 $29.76 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Commercial > 1 acre $3,031.21 $723.54 $661.23 $1,822.58 $1,668.19 $0.00 Commercial < 1 acre $433.03 $82.69 $132.25 $364.52 $333.64 $0.00 SWPPP Monthly $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Inspections Residential > 1 acre $1,385.70 $4,465.30 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Residential < 1 acre (if a part of a common plan of $5,265.64 $26,394.86 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 development) High Priority $4,988.51 $16,075.07 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Commercial > 1 acre $6,928.48 $22,326.48 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Commercial < 1 acre $1,039.27 $3,473.01 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Erosion Control Permit $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $28,770.27 Long Term Stormwater Management Plan $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 (LTSWMP) Residential > 1-acre part $1,385.70 $496.14 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 of a current LTSWMP Residential > 1 acre NOT a $554.28 $248.07 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $10.28 part of a current LTSWMP Residential < 1 acre apart $12,817.69 $4,589.33 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 of a current LTSWMP Commercial > 1 acre apart $15,589.08 $3,721.08 $991.85 $833.18 $762.60 $0.00 of a current LTSWMP Commercial > 1 acre NOT a part of a current $2,632.82 $992.29 $132.25 $111.09 $101.68 $0.00 LTSWMP Commercial < 1 acre apart $1,385.70 $496.14 $99.18 $83.32 $76.26 $0.00 of a current LTSWMP

The County may choose to enact lower-than-maximum fees, or to gradually phase in fee increases, in order to avoid large fee increases. The purpose of this study is simply to show the costs associated with providing each service.

ZIONS PUBLIC FINANCE 7

STAFF REPORT

TO: Summit County Council FROM: Matt Leavitt – Summit County Financial Officer DATE: November 25, 2020 SUBJECT: Public hearings regarding the 2020 budget amendments and the 2021 budget

BACKGROUND:

The County has been in budget discussions all year this year. Beginning with the COVID-19 pandemic shutdown of the local economy and subsequent budget amendments in April and May and continuing with 2021 budget requests by departments in July the County has been in budget discussions more than any prior year. With winter season upcoming and ongoing uncertainties that will require continued vigilance and stewardship of public funds.

After discussions with the Council through October and November regarding the County Manager’s recommended 2021 budget the next steps are to hold public hearings and adopt by resolution the 2020 amended budget and the 2021 budget.

COUNCIL REQUIRED ACTION:

Hold a public hearing and possibly adopt the budgets by resolution. Budget resolution 2020-30 amending the 2020 budget and resolution 2020-31 adopting the 2021 budget are attached to the staff report.

SUMMARY INFORMATION:

The County continues to be progressively advancing forward the Council priorities and strategic objectives which are reflected in the 2021 budget. Highlights of the 2021 budget that address Council’s priorities and objectives include the following:

 Transportation & congestion – continued modifications and improvements to the transit services provided by the County in addition to continued funding of transportation infrastructure projects;  Environmental stewardship – continued funding for electric vehicle program provided by the County;  Refining County General Plans and Development Codes – unfreezing a senior level planning position and providing contingency funding that may allow for unforeseen assistance during the year;  Mental health and substance abuse issues – ongoing County funding which was significantly increased beginning in 2017 and does not include partnerships with community organizations.

The County budget also includes ongoing support of staff. To that end the 2021 budget includes $410 thousand for a one-time incentive pay that may be awarded in July pending revenues received during the winter season as well as absorbing increases in benefits. While health care benefits are expected to remain unchanged the County will resume premium payments for the dental care program. Annual premiums for the dental program are about $310 thousand. The 2021 budget also includes $100 thousand for a 401(k) match program that was originally offered in the 2020 budget but was eliminated as part of the 2020 budget amendments. No cost of living or merit increase has been included.

The County has budgeted for two sales tax revenue bonds in 2021. The first, an approximate $18 million dollar issue, is anticipated to be sold at the beginning of the year. Projects related this bond are related to facility improvements, renovations, and construction. These projects will be spread out over the next four to five years. The second is a sales tax bond related to the recreation, arts & parks (RAP) program. After receiving overwhelming approval by voters in the November general election the RAP tax has been approved for another ten years. The County has planned to bond $4.2 million for recreation projects. The issuance for this bond is planned for later in 2021 with a call for projects in 2022.

The operating budget for 2021 is $57.2 million, an increase of 2.75% over the 2020 amended budget. The 2021 operating budget is a 6.78% reduction from the original 2020 budget. The following charts show resources supporting the 2021 budget and how those resources are allocated among the government functions.

2021 Budgeted Revenues 2% 1% 2% 11% Property taxes Sales taxes 44% Licenses & permits 18% Intergovernmental Fees Fines 4% Miscellaneous Contributions 18%

2021 Expenses by Function

6% 12% 34% Public safety Public works 13% General government Government services Public health Other departments

20% 15%

The 2021 budget includes $478 thousand from fund balances: $138 thousand from general fund, $314 thousand from municipal services fund, and $25 thousand from assessing & collecting fund.

2020 budget amendments will be presented to the Council at the December 2nd and December 9th public hearings. Many of the 2020 budget amendments are related to the County’s receipt of CARES Act funds and the uses of those funds. The County received $5.9 million in CARES Act funds as well as approximately $1.4 million from the State of Utah. Some of the uses of those funds have recently been reallocated and will be reconciled on November 30th.

Other notable amendments to the 2020 budget include health grants from the State of Utah for mental health and substance abuse prevention ($93 thousand) and tobacco prevention ($30 thousand). The elections budget will also be amended to reflect a grant from the State of Utah for the costs related to the presidential primary election ($42 thousand).

The department level budget is attached to the staff report following the budget resolutions.

STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:

Staff recommends that the Council open the public hearing on December 2nd to receive public comment and continue the public hearing on December 9th. Staff recommends that the Council adopt the resolution amending the 2020 amended budget and the resolution adopting the 2021 budget.

RESOLUTION 2020-31

A BUDGET RESOLUTION OF THE SUMMIT COUNTY COUNCIL

2021 BUDGETS

WHEREAS, pursuant to UCA §17-36-13 and §17B-1-610, on December 2, 2020 and December 9, 2020, the Summit County Council, acting as the governing body of the County and its local districts, held a series of public hearing for the following 2021 budgets: County General Fund, Municipal Fund, Assessing and Collecting, Health, Open Space Capital, Miscellaneous Special Revenue, General Agent Capital, Transient Room Tax, Restaurant Tax, Arts and Recreation Tax, Redevelopment Agency, Bond Fund, Capital Projects General and Municipal Funds, Transit District, Fleet Lease Fund, Tax Stability Fund, Service Area #6, Service Area #8, Wildland Fire, Echo Sewer Special Service District and the Municipal Building Authority; and,

WHEREAS, the Summit County Council, acting as the governing body of the County and its local districts, finds that it is in the best interests of the County and its local districts to adopt the 2020 budgets of the following: County General Fund, Municipal Fund, Assessing and Collecting, Health, Open Space Capital, Miscellaneous Special Revenue, General Agent Capital, Transient Room Tax, Restaurant Tax, Arts and Recreation Tax, Redevelopment Agency, Bond Fund, Capital Projects General and Municipal Funds, Transit District, Fleet Lease Fund, Tax Stability Fund, Service Area #6, Service Area #8, Wildland Fire, Echo Sewer Special Service District, and the Municipal Building Authority;

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, pursuant to UCA §17-36-15.1(2) and §17B-1-614, the Summit County Council, acting as the governing body of the County and its local districts, hereby adopts the 2021 budgets, as shown in Exhibit A herein, of the following:

County General Fund, Municipal Fund, Assessing and Collecting, Health, Open Space Capital, Miscellaneous Special Revenue, General Agent Capital, Transient Room Tax, Restaurant Tax, Arts and Recreation Tax, Redevelopment Agency, Bond Fund, Capital Projects General and Municipal Funds, Transit District, Fleet Lease Fund, Tax Stability Fund, Service Area #6, Service Area #8, Wildland Fire, Echo Sewer Special Service District, and the Municipal Building Authority.

APPROVED, ADOPTED, AND PASSED and ordered published by the Summit County Council, this 9th day of December, 2020.

COUNTY COUNCIL

SUMMIT COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH

ATTEST:

By: ______

Doug Clyde, Chair

______

Kent Jones

County Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

______

David L. Thomas

Chief Civil Deputy

Resolution 2020-30

A BUDGET RESOLUTION OF THE SUMMIT COUNTY COUNCIL

2020 BUDGET AMENDMENTS

WHEREAS, pursuant to UCA §17-36-22 and §17-36-23, on December 2, 2020 and December 9, 2020, the Summit County Council, acting as the governing body of the County, held a series of public hearings to amend the internal department accounts within the following 2020 budgetary funds: County General Fund, Municipal Fund, and Assessing and Collecting; and,

WHEREAS, the amendments to these budgetary funds results in an increase to the budgets of these funds; and,

WHEREAS, the Summit County Council, acting as the governing body of the County, finds that it is in the best interests of the County to amend the 2020 budgetary funds of the following: County General Fund, Municipal Fund, and Assessing and Collecting Fund;

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, pursuant to UCA §17-36-22 and §17-36-23, the Summit County Council, acting as the governing body of the County, hereby amends the 2020 budgetary funds, as shown in Exhibit A herein, of the following:

County General Fund

Municipal Fund

Assessing and Collecting.

APPROVED, ADOPTED, AND PASSED and ordered published by the Summit County Council, this 9th day of December, 2020.

COUNTY COUNCIL

SUMMIT COUNTY, STATE OF UTAH

ATTEST:

By: ______

Doug Clyde, Chair

______

Kent Jones

County Clerk

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

______

David L. Thomas

Chief Civil Deputy

EXHIBIT A

EXHIBIT B

z Summit County 2021 Budget z Meeting the County’s Strategic Objectives

. Transportation & congestion – expanding the County’s role in public transit; funding infrastructure maintenance;

. Environmental stewardship – expanding the network of electric vehicle charging stations;

. Refining planning & development codes – unfreeze senior level planning position;

. Mental health & substance abuse issues – continued funding and support, ongoing community partnerships z 2021 Operating Revenues

• Proposed 50% increase for curbside collection fee ($400k) • Covers 45.3% cost of collecting waste • Previously 31.9% covered by fee • Truth in taxation study in 2021 for 2022

• Fund balances utilization: • General - $138k • Municipal - $314k •A&C - $25k • Total = $478k z 2021 Operating Expenses

Public Safety = $19.2 million Public Works = $8.8 million General Government = $11.4 million Government Services = $7.4 million Public Health = $6.9 million Other Depts = $3.4 million Total = $57.3 million

• Salaries & benefits = 62.4% of operating budget • 2.7% increase over 2020 amended budget • 6.7% decrease over 2020 original budget z Human Resources

. $410k for one-time incentive pay, no COLA or Merit;

. Health care benefits charged to employees unchanged;

. Funding premiums for dental insurance at $310k;

. 401(k) match program at $100k

. “Unfreezing” three positions ($341k), Recorder, Criminal Investigations, Planning, and adding three positions in Transit ($339k transit fund) z 2021 Chart of Positions – Frozen Positions

Position Department Accountant Finance Dept Animal Control Officer Animal Control Behavior Health Budget Manager Behavioral Health Chief Deputy Auditor Auditor’s Office County Planner Community Development Public Safety Deputy Corrections Library Clerk (P/T) Heritage & Arts Reserve Deputy (2) Public Safety Reserves Sustainability Analyst Sustainability Weed Enforcement Officer Weeds Estimated annual savings = $1.2 million salaries & benefits z 2021 Bonding

. Approximate $18.0 million sales tax bond

. Facility improvements, renovations, and construction over the next four to five years

. Recreation, Arts & Parks (RAP) tax bond

. Approximate $4.2 million for recreation facility projects

. Issue a call for projects, evaluation and awards in 2021 z 2021 Transit District Revenues

Transit District Revenues Sales Taxes: 16,000,000 • Mass Transit ($2.1m) 14,000,000 • Additional Mass Transit ($4.7m) 12,000,000 • County Option for Highway & 10,000,000 Public Transit ($720k) 8,000,000 • County Public Transit ($3.7m) 6,000,000 4,000,000 2,000,000 - (2,000,000) 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Sales Taxes Grants Assessments Contributions Miscellaneous

2014 = $3.1m 2017 = $6.2m 2021 = $12.6m z 2021 Transit District Expenses

“Depreciation Expense” has Transit District Expenses also been used for budgeting 14,000,000 12,000,000 purposes to fund future 10,000,000 capital projects 8,000,000 6,000,000 2014 fund balance = $1.4m 4,000,000 Estimated 2021 ending fund 2,000,000 balance = $9.0m with a portion - committed 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Bus Service Personnel Overhead Professional Contracts Bus Replacement Capital & Equipment 2021 = $8.9m for Depreciation operations and $3.6m going into fund balances z 2020 Budget Amendments

. CARES Act funds: $5.9 million from Federal Government (passed through the State) for fast and direct economic assistance for American workers & families, small businesses, and preservation of jobs

. State Health Dept: $1.4 million to cover salaries & benefits, materials & supplies related to pandemic

. State Health Dept: $123 thousand for mental health & substance abuse prevention and tobacco prevention

. State of Utah: $42 thousand for presidential primary election z z Public Hearing