Mixed Integer Bilinear Programming with Applications to the Pooling Problem

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mixed Integer Bilinear Programming with Applications to the Pooling Problem MIXED INTEGER BILINEAR PROGRAMMING WITH APPLICATIONS TO THE POOLING PROBLEM A Thesis Presented to The Academic Faculty by Akshay Gupte In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in Operations Research H. Milton Stewart School of Industrial and Systems Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology December 2012 MIXED INTEGER BILINEAR PROGRAMMING WITH APPLICATIONS TO THE POOLING PROBLEM Approved by: Professor Shabbir Ahmed, Advisor Associate Professor Joel Sokol H. Milton Stewart School of Industrial H. Milton Stewart School of Industrial and Systems Engineering and Systems Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Georgia Institute of Technology Asst. Professor Santanu Dey, Advisor Dr. Myun Seok Cheon H. Milton Stewart School of Industrial Corporate Strategic Research and Systems Engineering ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Company Professor George Nemhauser Date Approved: August 1, 2012 H. Milton Stewart School of Industrial and Systems Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology To my beloved wife Akshi. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I take this opportunity to thank my advisors, Prof. Shabbir Ahmed and Asst. Prof. Santanu Dey, for their guidance and support throughout my Ph.D. studies. They have provided invaluable advice while conducting research and inspired me to pursue an academic career. Thanks to the rest of my committee, Prof. George Nemhauser, Assoc. Prof. Joel Sokol, and Dr. Myun Seok Cheon for their helpful comments and suggestions. I also appreciate the role of the faculty and staff at the School of Industrial and Systems Engineering in providing me with a high quality education. The seemingly infinite array of courses kept me busy along with my research. Dr. Gary Parker and Ms. Pam Morrison were a great help with administrative issues. Special thanks to my wife, Akshi, for her unconditional love and relentless support during these many years of graduate school. No doubt the journey has been long and arduous, and at times very stressful, however her comforting presence made matters easier for me. I deeply appreciate all the sacrifices she has made to help me achieve my goals. I also thank my parents for presenting me with the opportunity to attend graduate school and for their constant encouragement. I had like to thank my peers at Georgia Tech - Dimitri, Feng, Ahmed, Gustavo, Diego, Pete, Qie, Steve, and many more. Doing research becomes -easier when you have a good support group to exchange ideas and blow off steam outside work. Special mention also goes to the intangibles, such as the Pandoras and Spotifys, whose constant internet streaming enabled writing parts of this document into the wee hours. Finally, I would like to acknowledge the financial support for this research from Exxon- Mobil Corporate Strategic Research. I also thank Dr. Ahmet Keha from ExxonMobil for his guidance during my summer internship. Thanks to School of Industrial and Systems Engineering for John Morris fellowship and graduate assistantships during the initial few semesters. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS DEDICATION ...................................... iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .............................. iv LIST OF TABLES ................................... viii LIST OF FIGURES .................................. ix SUMMARY ........................................ x I POOLING PROBLEM .............................. 1 1.1 Introduction . 1 1.2 Problem Formulations . 3 1.2.1 Model parameters . 4 1.2.2 Concentration model : p-formulation . 6 1.2.3 Alternate formulations . 8 1.3 Problem sizes . 13 1.4 Variants of the pooling problem . 14 1.4.1 Time indexed pooling problem . 15 1.5 Relaxations . 18 1.5.1 Envelopes of bilinear functions . 18 1.5.2 Relaxing feasible sets . 23 1.5.3 Value function and Lagrangian relaxation . 28 1.6 Summary . 33 II BILINEAR SINGLE NODE FLOW ...................... 34 2.1 Introduction . 34 2.2 Basic properties . 38 2.2.1 Relaxing flow conservation . 39 2.2.2 Extreme points . 41 2.3 Standard polyhedral relaxations . 46 2.4 Disjunctive formulation . 52 2.4.1 Restrictions using extreme values . 53 2.4.2 High-dimensional representations . 58 v 2.5 Lifted inequalities . 63 2.5.1 Pairwise sequence independent lifting . 67 2.5.2 Valid inequalities from secants . 75 2.6 Conclusion . 81 2.7 Notes . 82 III MILP APPROACHES TO MIXED INTEGER BILINEAR PROGRAM- MING ......................................... 84 3.1 Introduction . 84 3.2 MILP formulations . 86 3.2.1 Reformulations of single term mixed integer bilinear set . 87 3.2.2 Reformulations of (MIBLP) . 92 3.3 Facets of single term mixed integer bilinear set . 93 3.3.1 Convex hulls of unconstrained bilinear terms . 94 3.3.2 Minimal covers of knapsack . 101 3.3.3 Some extensions . 105 3.4 Computational results . 108 3.4.1 Experimental setup . 108 3.4.2 General mixed integer bilinear problems . 110 3.4.3 Nonconvex objective function with linear constraints . 115 3.5 Bounded bilinear terms . 121 3.5.1 Cut separation . 122 3.5.2 Disjunctive inequalities . 124 3.5.3 Computational results . 129 3.6 General expansion knapsack . 132 3.6.1 Proof of validity . 134 3.6.2 Facets of the convex hull . 137 3.7 Conclusion . 139 IV DISCRETIZATION METHODS FOR POOLING PROBLEM ..... 140 4.1 Variable discretizations . 140 4.1.1 Flow discretization . 144 4.1.2 Ratio and specification discretization . 149 vi 4.2 Network flow MILPs . 150 4.2.1 Discretizing consistency requirements at each pool . 150 4.2.2 Exponentially large formulation for ratio discretization . 154 4.3 Computational results . 156 4.3.1 Experimental setup . 156 4.3.2 Test instances . 158 4.3.3 Preprocessing . 160 4.3.4 Global optimal solutions . 162 4.3.5 MILP results . 163 4.4 Summary . 169 REFERENCES ..................................... 173 vii LIST OF TABLES 1 Comparing problem sizes for alternate formulations of the pooling problem. 13 2 Test instances from MINLPLib . 111 3 Optimality gaps for test instances from MINLPLib . 111 4 Product bundling instances : test set 1. 113 5 Product bundling instances : test set 2. 114 6 The watts instances for product bundling. 115 7 Optimality gaps for watts instances . 115 8 General MILP test instances from MIPLIB . 116 9 Optimality gaps for test instances from MIPLIB . 116 10 BoxQP test instances from [106]. 118 11 Comparing Couenne on two formulations of BoxQP instances. 119 12 Disjoint bilinear instances : test set 1. 120 13 Disjoint bilinear instances : test set 2. 120 14 Cuts from bounded bilinear term : test set 1. 130 15 Cuts from bounded bilinear term : test set 2. 131 16 Cuts from bounded bilinear term : watts instances. 131 17 Nomenclature for bilinear sets. 143 18 Characteristics of the pooling instances. 160 19 Effects of LP preprocessing. 161 20 Global optimal solutions or best upper bounds after time limit. 164 21 Feasible solutions by discretizing outflows from each pool. 167 22 Feasible solutions by discretizing inflow ratios in pq-formulation. 168 23 Discretizing consistency requirements at each pool. 170 24 Summary of discretization methods . 172 viii LIST OF FIGURES 1 A sample pooling problem . 2 2 Single bilinear term and its McCormick envelopes. 19 3 Value functions for instances from Haverly [60]. 31 4 Tracking a single flow component at a node. 35 5 Restrictions of using extremal values. 57 P 6 Comparing restrictions of McCormick relaxations . 63 7 Example of perturbation function . 79 8 Symmetric bounds on variables in (21). 83 9 Enforcing consistency requirements at each pool using a expanded network. 151 10 Expanded network MILP model for ratio discretization . 155 ix SUMMARY This dissertation studies mixed integer bilinear programming (MIBLP) problems, which form a class of optimization problems defined as > > > min x Q0y + f x + g y x;y 0 0 s.t. Ax + Gy h0 ≤ > > > x Qty + f x + g y ht; t = 1; : : : ; p; t t ≤ x; y 0; xi Z+; i ; yj Z+; j : ≥ 2 2 I 2 2 J This problem has two sources of nonconvexity: one due to integer variables and second due to bilinear functions of the form x>Qy + f >x + g>y. Hence, a MIBLP must be solved using a global optimization algorithm to obtain a exact solution. A central theme of this research is the use of mixed integer linear programming (MILP)-type techniques for solving MIBLPs. Mixed integer bilinear programs find many applications, a particular one being the pooling problem. Chapter 1 introduces the pooling problem as a minimum cost network flow problem on a directed graph. The classical pooling problem is a continuous bilinear program (BLP). We review various equivalent optimization models for this problem and also address conventional relaxations obtained by relaxing all the bilinear terms. We compare the strengths of these relaxations and provide stronger than previously-known results about the tightness of the various problem formulations. The main contributions of this dissertation follow in Chapters 2 { 4. In Chapter 2, we investigate relaxations of a single node flow substructure of general network flow problems that involve material mixing phenomenon at certain nodes in the graph. We study some basic properties and generate disjunctive representations from appropriate restrictions of this set. Valid linear inequalities are derived by extending the theory of lifting restrictions of a set from MILP literature. We present explicit expressions for a exponential class of valid inequalities. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that contributes a x polyhedral relaxation for this set without adding any auxiliary variables. Chapter 3 studies general MIBLPs where every bilinear term is expressed as the product of one continuous and one integer variable. We propose using a mixed 0; 1 MILP formula- f g tion for solving this problem. Facet-defining inequalities are presented for the convex hull of the MILP reformulation a single mixed integer bilinear term. The proposed cutting planes.
Recommended publications
  • Xpress Nonlinear Manual This Material Is the Confidential, Proprietary, and Unpublished Property of Fair Isaac Corporation
    R FICO Xpress Optimization Last update 01 May, 2018 version 33.01 FICO R Xpress Nonlinear Manual This material is the confidential, proprietary, and unpublished property of Fair Isaac Corporation. Receipt or possession of this material does not convey rights to divulge, reproduce, use, or allow others to use it without the specific written authorization of Fair Isaac Corporation and use must conform strictly to the license agreement. The information in this document is subject to change without notice. If you find any problems in this documentation, please report them to us in writing. Neither Fair Isaac Corporation nor its affiliates warrant that this documentation is error-free, nor are there any other warranties with respect to the documentation except as may be provided in the license agreement. ©1983–2018 Fair Isaac Corporation. All rights reserved. Permission to use this software and its documentation is governed by the software license agreement between the licensee and Fair Isaac Corporation (or its affiliate). Portions of the program may contain copyright of various authors and may be licensed under certain third-party licenses identified in the software, documentation, or both. In no event shall Fair Isaac Corporation or its affiliates be liable to any person for direct, indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages, including lost profits, arising out of the use of this software and its documentation, even if Fair Isaac Corporation or its affiliates have been advised of the possibility of such damage. The rights and allocation of risk between the licensee and Fair Isaac Corporation (or its affiliates) are governed by the respective identified licenses in the software, documentation, or both.
    [Show full text]
  • Solving Mixed Integer Linear and Nonlinear Problems Using the SCIP Optimization Suite
    Takustraße 7 Konrad-Zuse-Zentrum D-14195 Berlin-Dahlem fur¨ Informationstechnik Berlin Germany TIMO BERTHOLD GERALD GAMRATH AMBROS M. GLEIXNER STEFAN HEINZ THORSTEN KOCH YUJI SHINANO Solving mixed integer linear and nonlinear problems using the SCIP Optimization Suite Supported by the DFG Research Center MATHEON Mathematics for key technologies in Berlin. ZIB-Report 12-27 (July 2012) Herausgegeben vom Konrad-Zuse-Zentrum f¨urInformationstechnik Berlin Takustraße 7 D-14195 Berlin-Dahlem Telefon: 030-84185-0 Telefax: 030-84185-125 e-mail: [email protected] URL: http://www.zib.de ZIB-Report (Print) ISSN 1438-0064 ZIB-Report (Internet) ISSN 2192-7782 Solving mixed integer linear and nonlinear problems using the SCIP Optimization Suite∗ Timo Berthold Gerald Gamrath Ambros M. Gleixner Stefan Heinz Thorsten Koch Yuji Shinano Zuse Institute Berlin, Takustr. 7, 14195 Berlin, Germany, fberthold,gamrath,gleixner,heinz,koch,[email protected] July 31, 2012 Abstract This paper introduces the SCIP Optimization Suite and discusses the ca- pabilities of its three components: the modeling language Zimpl, the linear programming solver SoPlex, and the constraint integer programming frame- work SCIP. We explain how these can be used in concert to model and solve challenging mixed integer linear and nonlinear optimization problems. SCIP is currently one of the fastest non-commercial MIP and MINLP solvers. We demonstrate the usage of Zimpl, SCIP, and SoPlex by selected examples, give an overview of available interfaces, and outline plans for future development. ∗A Japanese translation of this paper will be published in the Proceedings of the 24th RAMP Symposium held at Tohoku University, Miyagi, Japan, 27{28 September 2012, see http://orsj.or.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydraulic Optimization Demonstration for Groundwater Pump
    Figure 5-18: Shallow Particles, Contain Shallow 20-ppb Plume, & 500 gpm for Deep 20-ppb plume (1573 gpm, 3 new wells, 1 existing well) Injection Well Well Layer 1 Well Layer 2 30000 25000 20000 15000 10000 5000 0 0 5000 10000 15000 A "+" symbol indicates that a particle starting at that location is captured by one of the remediation wells, based on particle tracking with MODPATH. Shallow particles originate half-way down in layer 1. Figure 5-19: Deep Particles, Contain Shallow 20-ppb Plume, & 500 gpm for Deep 20-ppb plume (1573 gpm, 3 new wells, 1 existing well) Injection Well Well Layer 1 Well Layer 2 30000 25000 20000 15000 10000 5000 0 0 5000 10000 15000 A "+" symbol indicates that a particle starting at that location is captured by one of the remediation wells, based on particle tracking with MODPATH. Deep particles originate half-way down in layer 2. Figure 5-20: Shallow Particles, Contain Shallow 20-ppb & 50-ppb Plumes, & 500 gpm for Deep 20-ppb plume (2620 gpm, 6 new wells, 0 existing wells) Injection Well Well Layer 1 Well Layer 2 30000 25000 20000 15000 10000 5000 0 0 5000 10000 15000 A "+" symbol indicates that a particle starting at that location is captured by one of the remediation wells, based on particle tracking with MODPATH. Shallow particles originate half-way down in layer 1. Figure 5-21: Deep Particles, Contain Shallow 20-ppb & 50-ppb Plumes, & 500 gpm for Deep 20-ppb plume (2620 gpm, 6 new wells, 0 existing wells) Injection Well Well Layer 1 Well Layer 2 30000 25000 20000 15000 10000 5000 0 0 5000 10000 15000 A "+" symbol indicates that a particle starting at that location is captured by one of the remediation wells, based on particle tracking with MODPATH.
    [Show full text]
  • Using the COIN-OR Server
    Using the COIN-OR Server Your CoinEasy Team November 16, 2009 1 1 Overview This document is part of the CoinEasy project. See projects.coin-or.org/CoinEasy. In this document we describe the options available to users of COIN-OR who are interested in solving opti- mization problems but do not wish to compile source code in order to build the COIN-OR projects. In particular, we show how the user can send optimization problems to a COIN-OR server and get the solution result back. The COIN-OR server, webdss.ise.ufl.edu, is 2x Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.06GHz 512MiB L2 1024MiB L3, 2GiB DRAM, 4x73GiB scsi disk 2xGigE machine. This server allows the user to directly access the following COIN-OR optimization solvers: • Bonmin { a solver for mixed-integer nonlinear optimization • Cbc { a solver for mixed-integer linear programs • Clp { a linear programming solver • Couenne { a solver for mixed-integer nonlinear optimization problems and is capable of global optiomization • DyLP { a linear programming solver • Ipopt { an interior point nonlinear optimization solver • SYMPHONY { mixed integer linear solver that can be executed in either parallel (dis- tributed or shared memory) or sequential modes • Vol { a linear programming solver All of these solvers on the COIN-OR server may be accessed through either the GAMS or AMPL modeling languages. In Section 2.1 we describe how to use the solvers using the GAMS modeling language. In Section 2.2 we describe how to call the solvers using the AMPL modeling language. In Section 3 we describe how to call the solvers using a command line executable pro- gram OSSolverService.exe (or OSSolverService for Linux/Mac OS X users { in the rest of the document we refer to this executable using a .exe extension).
    [Show full text]
  • SDDP.Jl: a Julia Package for Stochastic Dual Dynamic Programming
    Optimization Online manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) SDDP.jl: a Julia package for Stochastic Dual Dynamic Programming Oscar Dowson · Lea Kapelevich Received: date / Accepted: date Abstract In this paper we present SDDP.jl, an open-source library for solving multistage stochastic optimization problems using the Stochastic Dual Dynamic Programming algorithm. SDDP.jl is built upon JuMP, an algebraic modelling lan- guage in Julia. This enables a high-level interface for the user, while simultaneously providing performance that is similar to implementations in low-level languages. We benchmark the performance of SDDP.jl against a C++ implementation of SDDP for the New Zealand Hydro-Thermal Scheduling Problem. On the bench- mark problem, SDDP.jl is approximately 30% slower than the C++ implementa- tion. However, this performance penalty is small when viewed in context of the generic nature of the SDDP.jl library compared to the single purpose C++ imple- mentation. Keywords julia · stochastic dual dynamic programming 1 Introduction Solving any mathematical optimization problem requires four steps: the formula- tion of the problem by the user; the communication of the problem to the com- puter; the efficient computational solution of the problem; and the communication of the computational solution back to the user. Over time, considerable effort has been made to improve each of these four steps for a variety of problem classes such linear, quadratic, mixed-integer, conic, and non-linear. For example, con- sider the evolution from early file-formats such as MPS [25] to modern algebraic modelling languages embedded in high-level languages such as JuMP [11], or the 73-fold speed-up in solving difficult mixed-integer linear programs in seven years by Gurobi [16].
    [Show full text]
  • ILOG AMPL CPLEX System Version 10.0 User's Guide
    ILOG AMPL CPLEX System Version 10.0 User’s Guide Standard (Command-line) Version Including CPLEX Directives January 2006 COPYRIGHT NOTICE Copyright © 1987-2006, by ILOG S.A., 9 Rue de Verdun, 94253 Gentilly Cedex, France, and ILOG, Inc., 1080 Linda Vista Ave., Mountain View, California 94043, USA. All rights reserved. General Use Restrictions This document and the software described in this document are the property of ILOG and are protected as ILOG trade secrets. They are furnished under a license or nondisclosure agreement, and may be used or copied only within the terms of such license or nondisclosure agreement. No part of this work may be reproduced or disseminated in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of ILOG S.A, or ILOG, Inc. Trademarks ILOG, the ILOG design, CPLEX, and all other logos and product and service names of ILOG are registered trademarks or trademarks of ILOG in France, the U.S. and/or other countries. All other company and product names are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective holders. Java and all Java-based marks are either trademarks or registered trademarks of Sun Microsystems, Inc. in the United States and other countries. Microsoft, Windows, and Windows NT are either trademarks or registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and other countries. document version 10.0 CO N T E N T S Table of Contents Chapter 1 Welcome to AMPL . 9 Using this Guide. .9 Installing AMPL . .10 Requirements. .10 Unix Installation . .10 Windows Installation . .11 AMPL and Parallel CPLEX.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes 1: Introduction to Optimization Models
    Notes 1: Introduction to Optimization Models IND E 599 September 29, 2010 IND E 599 Notes 1 Slide 1 Course Objectives I Survey of optimization models and formulations, with focus on modeling, not on algorithms I Include a variety of applications, such as, industrial, mechanical, civil and electrical engineering, financial optimization models, health care systems, environmental ecology, and forestry I Include many types of optimization models, such as, linear programming, integer programming, quadratic assignment problem, nonlinear convex problems and black-box models I Include many common formulations, such as, facility location, vehicle routing, job shop scheduling, flow shop scheduling, production scheduling (min make span, min max lateness), knapsack/multi-knapsack, traveling salesman, capacitated assignment problem, set covering/packing, network flow, shortest path, and max flow. IND E 599 Notes 1 Slide 2 Tentative Topics Each topic is an introduction to what could be a complete course: 1. basic linear models (LP) with sensitivity analysis 2. integer models (IP), such as the assignment problem, knapsack problem and the traveling salesman problem 3. mixed integer formulations 4. quadratic assignment problems 5. include uncertainty with chance-constraints, stochastic programming scenario-based formulations, and robust optimization 6. multi-objective formulations 7. nonlinear formulations, as often found in engineering design 8. brief introduction to constraint logic programming 9. brief introduction to dynamic programming IND E 599 Notes 1 Slide 3 Computer Software I Catalyst Tools (https://catalyst.uw.edu/) I AIMMS - optimization software (http://www.aimms.com/) Ming Fang - AIMMS software consultant IND E 599 Notes 1 Slide 4 What is Mathematical Programming? Mathematical programming refers to \programming" as a \planning" activity: as in I linear programming (LP) I integer programming (IP) I mixed integer linear programming (MILP) I non-linear programming (NLP) \Optimization" is becoming more common, e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • ILOG AMPL CPLEX System Version 9.0 User's Guide
    ILOG AMPL CPLEX System Version 9.0 User’s Guide Standard (Command-line) Version Including CPLEX Directives September 2003 Copyright © 1987-2003, by ILOG S.A. All rights reserved. ILOG, the ILOG design, CPLEX, and all other logos and product and service names of ILOG are registered trademarks or trademarks of ILOG in France, the U.S. and/or other countries. JavaTM and all Java-based marks are either trademarks or registered trademarks of Sun Microsystems, Inc. in the United States and other countries. Microsoft, Windows, and Windows NT are either trademarks or registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation in the U.S. and other countries. All other brand, product and company names are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective holders. AMPL is a registered trademark of AMPL Optimization LLC and is distributed under license by ILOG.. CPLEX is a registered trademark of ILOG.. Printed in France. CO N T E N T S Table of Contents Chapter 1 Introduction . 1 Welcome to AMPL . .1 Using this Guide. .1 Installing AMPL . .2 Requirements. .2 Unix Installation . .3 Windows Installation . .3 AMPL and Parallel CPLEX. 4 Licensing . .4 Usage Notes . .4 Installed Files . .5 Chapter 2 Using AMPL. 7 Running AMPL . .7 Using a Text Editor . .7 Running AMPL in Batch Mode . .8 Chapter 3 AMPL-Solver Interaction . 11 Choosing a Solver . .11 Specifying Solver Options . .12 Initial Variable Values and Solvers. .13 ILOG AMPL CPLEX SYSTEM 9.0 — USER’ S GUIDE v Problem and Solution Files. .13 Saving temporary files . .14 Creating Auxiliary Files . .15 Running Solvers Outside AMPL. .16 Using MPS File Format .
    [Show full text]
  • Open Source Tools for Optimization in Python
    Open Source Tools for Optimization in Python Ted Ralphs Sage Days Workshop IMA, Minneapolis, MN, 21 August 2017 T.K. Ralphs (Lehigh University) Open Source Optimization August 21, 2017 Outline 1 Introduction 2 COIN-OR 3 Modeling Software 4 Python-based Modeling Tools PuLP/DipPy CyLP yaposib Pyomo T.K. Ralphs (Lehigh University) Open Source Optimization August 21, 2017 Outline 1 Introduction 2 COIN-OR 3 Modeling Software 4 Python-based Modeling Tools PuLP/DipPy CyLP yaposib Pyomo T.K. Ralphs (Lehigh University) Open Source Optimization August 21, 2017 Caveats and Motivation Caveats I have no idea about the background of the audience. The talk may be either too basic or too advanced. Why am I here? I’m not a Sage developer or user (yet!). I’m hoping this will be a chance to get more involved in Sage development. Please ask lots of questions so as to guide me in what to dive into! T.K. Ralphs (Lehigh University) Open Source Optimization August 21, 2017 Mathematical Optimization Mathematical optimization provides a formal language for describing and analyzing optimization problems. Elements of the model: Decision variables Constraints Objective Function Parameters and Data The general form of a mathematical optimization problem is: min or max f (x) (1) 8 9 < ≤ = s.t. gi(x) = bi (2) : ≥ ; x 2 X (3) where X ⊆ Rn might be a discrete set. T.K. Ralphs (Lehigh University) Open Source Optimization August 21, 2017 Types of Mathematical Optimization Problems The type of a mathematical optimization problem is determined primarily by The form of the objective and the constraints.
    [Show full text]
  • Computing in Operations Research Using Julia
    Computing in Operations Research using Julia Miles Lubin and Iain Dunning MIT Operations Research Center INFORMS 2013 { October 7, 2013 1 / 25 High-level, high-performance, open-source dynamic language for technical computing. Keep productivity of dynamic languages without giving up speed. Familiar syntax Python+PyPy+SciPy+NumPy integrated completely. Latest concepts in programming languages. 2 / 25 Claim: \close-to-C" speeds Within a factor of 2 Performs well on microbenchmarks, but how about real computational problems in OR? Can we stop writing solvers in C++? 3 / 25 Technical advancements in Julia: Fast code generation (JIT via LLVM). Excellent connections to C libraries - BLAS/LAPACK/... Metaprogramming. Optional typing, multiple dispatch. 4 / 25 Write generic code, compile efficient type-specific code C: (fast) int f() { int x = 1, y = 2; return x+y; } Julia: (No type annotations) Python: (slow) function f() def f(): x = 1; y = 2 x = 1; y = 2 return x + y return x+y end 5 / 25 Requires type inference by compiler Difficult to add onto exiting languages Available in MATLAB { limited scope PyPy for Python { incompatible with many libraries Julia designed from the ground up to support type inference efficiently 6 / 25 Simplex algorithm \Bread and butter" of operations research Computationally very challenging to implement efficiently1 Matlab implementations too slow to be used in practice High-quality open-source codes exist in C/C++ Can Julia compete? 1Bixby, Robert E. "Solving Real-World Linear Programs: A Decade and More of Progress", Operations Research, Vol. 50, pp. 3{15, 2002. 7 / 25 Implemented benchmark operations in Julia, C++, MATLAB, Python.
    [Show full text]
  • MP-Opt-Model User's Manual, Version
    MP-Opt-Model User's Manual Version 2.0 Ray D. Zimmerman July 8, 2020 © 2020 Power Systems Engineering Research Center (PSerc) All Rights Reserved Contents 1 Introduction6 1.1 Background................................6 1.2 License and Terms of Use........................7 1.3 Citing MP-Opt-Model..........................8 1.4 MP-Opt-Model Development.......................8 2 Getting Started9 2.1 System Requirements...........................9 2.2 Installation................................9 2.3 Sample Usage............................... 10 2.4 Documentation.............................. 13 3 MP-Opt-Model { Overview 14 4 Solver Interface Functions 15 4.1 LP/QP Solvers { qps master ...................... 15 4.1.1 QP Example............................ 18 4.2 MILP/MIQP Solvers { miqps master .................. 19 4.2.1 MILP Example.......................... 21 4.3 NLP Solvers { nlps master ....................... 21 4.3.1 NLP Example 1.......................... 24 4.3.2 NLP Example 2.......................... 25 4.4 Nonlinear Equation Solvers { nleqs master .............. 28 4.4.1 NLEQ Example.......................... 30 5 Optimization Model Class { opt model 34 5.1 Adding Variables............................. 34 5.1.1 Variable Subsets......................... 35 5.2 Adding Constraints............................ 36 5.2.1 Linear Constraints........................ 36 5.2.2 General Nonlinear Constraints.................. 37 5.3 Adding Costs............................... 38 5.3.1 Quadratic Costs.......................... 39 5.3.2 General
    [Show full text]
  • CME 338 Large-Scale Numerical Optimization Notes 2
    Stanford University, ICME CME 338 Large-Scale Numerical Optimization Instructor: Michael Saunders Spring 2019 Notes 2: Overview of Optimization Software 1 Optimization problems We study optimization problems involving linear and nonlinear constraints: NP minimize φ(x) n x2R 0 x 1 subject to ` ≤ @ Ax A ≤ u; c(x) where φ(x) is a linear or nonlinear objective function, A is a sparse matrix, c(x) is a vector of nonlinear constraint functions ci(x), and ` and u are vectors of lower and upper bounds. We assume the functions φ(x) and ci(x) are smooth: they are continuous and have continuous first derivatives (gradients). Sometimes gradients are not available (or too expensive) and we use finite difference approximations. Sometimes we need second derivatives. We study algorithms that find a local optimum for problem NP. Some examples follow. If there are many local optima, the starting point is important. x LP Linear Programming min cTx subject to ` ≤ ≤ u Ax MINOS, SNOPT, SQOPT LSSOL, QPOPT, NPSOL (dense) CPLEX, Gurobi, LOQO, HOPDM, MOSEK, XPRESS CLP, lp solve, SoPlex (open source solvers [7, 34, 57]) x QP Quadratic Programming min cTx + 1 xTHx subject to ` ≤ ≤ u 2 Ax MINOS, SQOPT, SNOPT, QPBLUR LSSOL (H = BTB, least squares), QPOPT (H indefinite) CLP, CPLEX, Gurobi, LANCELOT, LOQO, MOSEK BC Bound Constraints min φ(x) subject to ` ≤ x ≤ u MINOS, SNOPT LANCELOT, L-BFGS-B x LC Linear Constraints min φ(x) subject to ` ≤ ≤ u Ax MINOS, SNOPT, NPSOL 0 x 1 NC Nonlinear Constraints min φ(x) subject to ` ≤ @ Ax A ≤ u MINOS, SNOPT, NPSOL c(x) CONOPT, LANCELOT Filter, KNITRO, LOQO (second derivatives) IPOPT (open source solver [30]) Algorithms for finding local optima are used to construct algorithms for more complex optimization problems: stochastic, nonsmooth, global, mixed integer.
    [Show full text]