Constitutional Amendments Proposed for the November 2021 Ballot

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Constitutional Amendments Proposed for the November 2021 Ballot August 18, 2021 No. 87-3 FOCUS report Constitutional amendments proposed for the November 2021 ballot Texas voters have approved 507 amendments to the state Constitution since its adoption in 1876, according to the Legislative Reference Library. Eight more proposed amendments will be submitted for voter approval at the general election on Tuesday, November 2, 2021. The following report contains an explanation of the process by which constitutional amendments are adopted and information on the proposed 2021 amendments, including a background, analysis, and arguments for and against each proposal. Amending the Texas Constitution ............................................................................................................ 2 Previous election results ............................................................................................................................ 4 Proposition 1: Authorizing the Legislature to permit charitable raffles at rodeo events .............................. 5 Proposition 2: Authorizing counties to issue debt backed by property tax increment ................................ 7 Proposition 3: Constitutionally prohibiting state limits on religious services ............................................. 9 Proposition 4: Changing eligibility requirements for appellate and district judges .................................. 11 Proposition 5: Permitting SCJC to accept complaints on all candidates for judicial office ...................... 13 Proposition 6: Creating right of long-term care residents to designate essential caregiver ........................ 15 Proposition 7: Property tax limitation for surviving spouse of person with disability .............................. 17 Proposition 8: Expanding homestead exemption eligibility for surviving spouses of service members ..... 19 HRO HOUSE RESEARCH ORGANIZATION Texas House of Representatives 87th Legislature Page 2 House Research Organization Amending the Texas Constitution Article 17 of the Texas Constitution describes the Election date process by which the Constitution may be amended and requires that amendments be approved by a majority of The Legislature specifies an election date for voter Texas voters to go into effect. For a proposition to appear consideration of proposed constitutional amendments. In on the ballot, the Legislature must adopt a proposed recent years, most proposals have been submitted at the constitutional amendment in a joint resolution. Joint November general election held in odd-numbered years. resolutions contain the ballot wording of the propositions to go before the voters, and some require “enabling” legislation to further specify how the amendment would Publication operate. Texas Constitution Art. 17, sec. 1 requires that a brief explanatory statement of the nature of each proposed Joint resolutions amendment, along with the ballot wording for each, be published twice in each newspaper in the state that prints The Texas Legislature proposes constitutional official notices. The first notice must be published 50 to amendments in joint resolutions that originate in 60 days before the election. The second notice must be either the House of Representatives or the Senate. For published on the same day of the following week. The example, Proposition 1 on the November 2, 2021, ballot secretary of state must send a complete copy of each was proposed by House Joint Resolution (HJR) 143, amendment to each county clerk, who must post it in the introduced by Rep. Charlie Geren and sponsored in the courthouse at least 30 days before the election. Senate by Sen. Jane Nelson. Art. 17, sec. 1 of the Texas Constitution requires that a joint resolution be adopted by The secretary of state prepares the explanatory at least a two-thirds vote of the membership of each house statement, which must be approved by the attorney of the Legislature (100 votes in the House, 21 votes in the general. The estimated total cost of publication twice in Senate) to be presented to voters. The governor cannot newspapers across the state for the November 2 election is veto a joint resolution. $178,333, according to the Legislative Budget Board. Amendments may be proposed in either regular or special sessions. A joint resolution includes the text of Enabling legislation the proposed constitutional amendment and specifies an election date. The ballot wording of a proposition is Some constitutional amendments are self-enacting specified in the joint resolution. The secretary of state and require no additional legislation to implement conducts a random drawing to assign each proposition their provisions. Other amendments grant discretionary a ballot number if more than one proposition is being authority to the Legislature to enact legislation in a considered. particular area or within certain guidelines. These amendments require “enabling” legislation to fill in If voters reject an amendment proposal, the the details of how the amendment would operate. The Legislature may resubmit it. For example, at an August Legislature sometimes adopts enabling legislation in 10, 1991, election, the voters rejected a proposition advance, making the effective date of the legislation authorizing $300 million in general obligation bonds contingent on voter approval of a particular amendment. for college student loans then approved an identical If voters reject the amendment, the legislation dependent proposition at the November 5, 1991, election after the on the constitutional change does not take effect. Legislature readopted the proposal and resubmitted it in essentially the same form. House Research Organization Page 3 Effective date Constitutional amendments take effect when the official vote canvass confirms statewide majority approval unless a later date is specified. Statewide election results are tabulated by the secretary of state and must be canvassed by the governor 15 to 30 days following the election. Page 4 House Research Organization Previous election results Analyses of the 10 proposals on the November 5, 2019, ballot appear in House Research Organization Focus Report No. 86-3, Constitutional Amendments Proposed for November 2019 Ballot, August 27, 2019. Prop 1: Allowing municipal court judges to hold Prop 6: Increasing CPRIT’s bond authority from $3 office in more than one municipality billion to $6 billion For 685,827 34.6% For 1,259,398 64.0% Against 1,298,866 65.4% Against 707,939 36.0% Prop 2: Allowing TWDB to issue more water Prop 7: Creating the Flood Infrastructure Fund development project bonds For 1,294,936 65.6% For 1,459,578 74.1% Against 677,619 34.4% Against 509,590 25.9% Prop 3: Allowing temporary property tax Prop 8: Allowing increased distributions to exemptions after a disaster Available School Fund For 1,679,049 85.1% For 1,538,726 77.9% Against 294,235 14.9% Against 437,384 22.1% Prop 9: Exempting precious metals held in Texas Prop 4: Prohibiting a state individual income tax depositories from property taxes For 1,477,373 74.4% For 982,881 51.3% Against 509,547 25.6% Against 932,885 48.7% Prop 5: Dedicating sporting goods sales tax Prop 10: Allowing retired law enforcement animal revenue to TPWD and THC transfer without fee For 1,745,353 88.0% For 1,858,876 93.8% Against 237,656 12.0% Against 123,648 6.2% Source: Secretary of State’s Office House Research Organization Page 5 Proposition 1: Authorizing the Legislature to permit charitable raffles at rodeo events HJR 143 by Geren (Nelson) Background or the Women’s Professional Rodeo Association to conduct charitable raffles at rodeo venues. Texas Constitution Art. 3, sec. 47(d-1) authorizes the Legislature by general law to permit professional sports The ballot proposal reads: “The constitutional team charitable foundations to conduct charitable raffles. amendment authorizing the professional sports team Occupations Code ch. 2004, the Professional Sports charitable foundations of organizations sanctioned by the Team Charitable Foundation Raffle Enabling Act, allows Professional Rodeo Cowboys Association or the Women’s charitable foundations meeting certain requirements Professional Rodeo Association to conduct charitable to conduct charitable raffles during each preseason, raffles at rodeo venues.” regular season, and postseason game hosted at the home venue of the professional sports team associated with the foundation. Under sec. 2004.007, for each raffle a Supporters say foundation may deduct no more than 10 percent of the proceeds from ticket sales to pay reasonable operating Proposition 1 would grant authority to the Legislature costs of conducting the raffle, including promotion, to allow charitable raffles to be conducted at rodeo events, advertisements, and other specified expenses. which is consistent with its current authority to allow such raffles at other professional sporting events. In 2015, Charitable raffles may be conducted by charitable voters by an overwhelming margin approved Proposition foundations associated with a professional sports team 4, which authorized the Legislature to permit charitable organized in Texas that is one of the following: a member raffles by professional sports team charitable foundations. of Major League Baseball, the National Basketball Since the approval of Proposition 4, charitable raffles Association, the National Football League, Major League have raised large amounts of money for worthy causes Soccer, the American Hockey League, the East Coast related to education, cancer research, and youth programs. Hockey League, Minor League
Recommended publications
  • Substance Abuse Trends in Texas: June 2001
    Substance Abuse Trends in Texas: June 2001 Texas Commission on Alcohol and Drug Abuse Table of Contents Overview . 1 Area Description . 2 Data Sources and Time Periods . 2 Cocaine and Crack . 3 Alcohol . 6 Heroin . 9 Other Opiates . 11 Marijuana . 13 Stimulants . 15 Depressants . 17 Club Drugs and Hallucinogens . 18 Rohypnol . 18 Gamma Hydroxybutrate . 19 Ecstasy . 20 Ketamine . 20 PCP . 20 LSD . 21 Dextromethorphan . 22 Inhalants . 22 AIDS and Drug Use . 23 ©June 2001, Texas Commission on Alcohol and Drug Abuse (TCADA), Austin, Texas. TCADA grants full permission to reproduce and distribute any part of this document for non-commercial use. Appropriate credits appreciated. TCADA is a state agency headed by six commissioners appointed by the governor. TCADA provides educational materials on substance use, develops prevention, intervention, and treatment programs, and conducts studies on the problems of substance use and compulsive gambling in Texas. Texas Commission on Alcohol and Drug Abuse 9001 North IH-35, Suite 105 Austin, Texas 78753-5233 (512) 349-6600 • (800) 832-9623 Web site: www.tcada.state.tx.us Substance Abuse Trends in Texas—June 2001 Texas Commission on Alcohol and Drug Abuse — Austin, Texas OVERVIEW JANE CARLISLE MAXWELL, PH.D. rack cocaine is the primary The percentage of arrestees testing Depressants continue to be a problem illicit drug for which adult positive for heroin remains mixed, because of their availability in Mexico. Cclients enter treatment. The and overdose deaths in 1999 are Mentions of downers have decreased proportion of Anglo and Hispanic down slightly from 1998. The price in the Dallas emergency rooms. admissions for crack now totals 50 and purity of Mexican heroin remain percent as African-American crack steady, with plentiful supplies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Big Freeze I Am Glad to See Warmer Weather No Way for the County to Continue Normal Operations Has Returned to Tarrant County
    March 2021 County News Update Volume 4 No. 1 The Big Freeze I am glad to see warmer weather no way for the County to continue normal operations has returned to Tarrant County. It under such extenuating circumstances. I am glad to has been a while since we have say the county was only closed for one week in or- seen temperatures that cold. der for us to address critical repairs needed for us to While I believe locally we did all operate. within our power to keep folks Of particular note, our Juvenile Detention Center safe and warm, there were many experienced a litany of challenges. From heating Tarrant County Judge shortcomings statewide which units failing to a water main break which caused a B. Glen Whitley could have and should have been water pressure loss to the entire facility, our staff avoided. I, like many of you, went days without responded well to the situation and worked tirelessly power at a time when we needed it the most to keep along with the City of Fort Worth to restore services our homes warm and our water flowing. Equally as as quickly as possible to those under our care. frustrating was sitting on hold to schedule an ap- pointment with a plumber to fix ruptured pipes. This is something that no Texan should ever have to experience. While the finger pointing continues in Austin, Tar- rant County and its facilities continue to recover. I would like to take this opportunity to say thank you to all of the first responders who braved these winter storms to minimize what could have been an even more catastrophic event.
    [Show full text]
  • Licensing and Administrative Procedures
    Interim Report to the 87 th Texas Legislature House Committee on Licensing and Administrative Procedures January 2021 HOUSE COMMITTEE ON LICENSING AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES TEXAS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES INTERIM REPORT 2020 A REPORT TO THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 87TH TEXAS LEGISLATURE TRACY O. KING CHAIRMAN COMMITTEE CLERK SAM BACARISSE Committee On Licensing and Administrative Procedures January 7, 2021 Tracy O. King P.O. Box 2910 Chairman Austin, Texas 78768-2910 The Honorable Dennis Bonnen Speaker, Texas House of Representatives Members of the Texas House of Representatives Texas State Capitol, Rm. 2W.13 Austin, Texas 78701 Dear Mr. Speaker and Fellow Members: The Committee on Licensing and Administrative Procedures of the Eighty-sixth Legislature hereby submits its interim report including recommendations and drafted legislation for consideration by the Eighty-seventh Legislature. Respectfully submitted, _______________________ Tracy O. King _______________________ _______________________ Craig Goldman Charlie Geren _______________________ _______________________ Ryan Guillen Sam Harless _______________________ _______________________ Ana Hernandez Abel Herrero _______________________ _______________________ Ken King John Kuempel _______________________ _______________________ Chris Paddie Senfronia Thompson Craig Goldman Vice-Chairman Members: Charlie Geren, Ryan Guillen, Sam Harless, Ana Hernandez, Abel Herrero, Ken King, John Kuempel, Chris Paddie, Senfronia Thompson Craig Goldman Vice-Chairman Members: Charlie Geren, Ryan
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 7. Gambling's Impacts on People and Places
    poor or undeveloped methodology, or CHAPTER 7. GAMBLING’S researchers’ biases. IMPACTS ON PEOPLE AND It is evident to this Commission that there are PLACES significant benefits and significant costs to the places, namely, those communities which embrace gambling and that many of the impacts, “Gambling is inevitable. No matter what both positive and negative, of gambling spill is said or done by advocates or over into the surrounding communities, which opponents in all its various forms, it is an often have no say in the matter. In addition, activity that is practiced, or tacitly those with compulsive gambling problems take endorsed, by a substantial majority of significant costs with them to communities 1 Americans.” throughout the nation. In an ideal environment, citizens and policy-makers consider all of the Even the members of the previous federal study relevant data and information as part of their would be astounded at the exponential growth of decisionmaking process. Unfortunately, the lack gambling, in its availability, forms and dollars of quality research and the controversy wagered, in the 23 years since they chose the surrounding this industry rarely enable citizens words above to begin their work. Today, the and policymakers to truly determine the net various components of legalized gambling have impact of gambling in their communities, or, in an impact¾in many cases, a significant one¾on some cases, their backyards. numerous communities and almost every citizen in this nation. The principal task of this Many communities, often those suffering Commission was to examine the “social and economic hardship and social problems, consider economic impacts of gambling on individuals, gambling as a panacea to those ills.
    [Show full text]
  • IDEOLOGY and PARTISANSHIP in the 87Th (2021) REGULAR SESSION of the TEXAS LEGISLATURE
    IDEOLOGY AND PARTISANSHIP IN THE 87th (2021) REGULAR SESSION OF THE TEXAS LEGISLATURE Mark P. Jones, Ph.D. Fellow in Political Science, Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy July 2021 © 2021 Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy This material may be quoted or reproduced without prior permission, provided appropriate credit is given to the author and the Baker Institute for Public Policy. Wherever feasible, papers are reviewed by outside experts before they are released. However, the research and views expressed in this paper are those of the individual researcher(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the Baker Institute. Mark P. Jones, Ph.D. “Ideology and Partisanship in the 87th (2021) Regular Session of the Texas Legislature” https://doi.org/10.25613/HP57-BF70 Ideology and Partisanship in the 87th (2021) Regular Session of the Texas Legislature Executive Summary This report utilizes roll call vote data to improve our understanding of the ideological and partisan dynamics of the Texas Legislature’s 87th regular session. The first section examines the location of the members of the Texas Senate and of the Texas House on the liberal-conservative dimension along which legislative politics takes place in Austin. In both chambers, every Republican is more conservative than every Democrat and every Democrat is more liberal than every Republican. There does, however, exist substantial ideological diversity within the respective Democratic and Republican delegations in each chamber. The second section explores the extent to which each senator and each representative was on the winning side of the non-lopsided final passage votes (FPVs) on which they voted.
    [Show full text]
  • Draftkings-Lawsuit.Pdf
    Cause No. _________________ DRAFTKINGS, INC., § IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF a Delaware corporation, § § DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS Plaintiff, § § § v. § § § § KEN PAXTON, Attorney General of § the State of Texas, in his § official capacity § § ____ JUDICIAL DISTRICT Defendant. § PLAINTIFF’S ORIGINAL PETITION FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT This action seeks to prevent the Texas Attorney General from further acting to eliminate daily fantasy sports (“DFS”) contests enjoyed by hundreds of thousands of Texans for the past decade. Specifically, Plaintiff DraftKings, Inc. (“DraftKings”) seeks a declaratory judgment that DFS contests are legal under Texas law. This relief is necessary to prevent immediate and irreparable harm to DraftKings, which otherwise could be forced out of business in Texas—one of its three largest state markets—and irrevocably damaged nationwide. This Court need look no further than to the Attorney General’s orchestration of DraftKings’ competitor FanDuel Inc.’s (“FanDuel”) effective Plaintiff’s Original Petition Page 1 departure from the State of Texas to recognize that the Attorney General’s actions pose direct, immediate, and particularized harm to DraftKings. I. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT For more than 50 years, millions of Texans have enjoyed playing traditional season-long fantasy sports. Virtually every level of every sport—from professional football to college basketball to international soccer—has given rise to some form of fantasy contest, in which friends, neighbors, coworkers, and even strangers enhance their enjoyment of the sport by competing against one another for prizes in organized leagues to determine who has the skill—akin to a general manager of a sports team—to put together the most successful fantasy team.
    [Show full text]
  • Steven F. Hotze, M.D., the Sponsor Committee and Conservative
    SPONSOR COMMITTEE US Senators Cecil Bell Kenneth Sheets John Cornyn Dwayne Bohac Ralph Sheffield Ted Cruz Dennis Bonnen Ron Simmons US Congressmen Greg Bonnen David Simpson Joe Barton Linda Harper Brown Wayne Smith John Carter Cindy Burkett John Smithee John Culberson Angie Chen Button Drew Springer Sam Johnson Giovanni Capriglione Phil Stephenson Michael McCaul Travis Clardy Jonathan Stickland Pete Olson Byron Cook Ed Thompson Pete Sessions Tom Craddick Steve Toth Lamar Smith Myra Crownover Scott Turner Steve Stockman Drew Darby Jason Villaba Randy Weber John Davis James White Roger Williams Gary Elkins John Zerwas Statewide Officials Marsha Farney Bill Zedler PUBL Christie Craddick Allen Fletcher State Representative RE IC E AN IV S Susan Combs Dan Flynn Candidates T A O V F David Dewhurst Matt Frause Rodney Anderson R T E E S Jerry Patterson John Frullo TJ Fabby X N A O S Barry Smitherman Charlie Geren Wayne Faircloth C Todd Staples Craig Goldman Rob Henneke Statewide Patricia Harless Al Hoang Candidates Harvey Hilderbran Mark Keough Dan Branch Dan Huberty Brooks Langraf Wayne Christian Bryan Hughes Morgan Meyer DEFENSE OF TEXAS MARRIAGE Sid Miller Todd Hunter Dennis Paul Dan Patrick Jason Isaac Ted Seago AMENDMENT RALLY Ken Paxton Kyle Kacal Mike Schofield Ryan Sitton Ken King Matt Shaheen State Senators Phil King Stuart Spitzer Brian Birdwell Tim Kleinschmidt Conservative Donna Campbell Stephanie Klick Organization Craig Estes Lois Kolkhorst Leaders Troy Fraser John Kuempel Norman Adams Kelly Hancock Lyle Larson Dr. Ted Behr Jane Nelson Jodie Laubenberg Gary Bennet Robert Nichols George Lavender Gina Gleason Charles Schwertner Jeff Leach Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • TSTA-PAC 2018 Endorsements Primary Winners / Runoffs / Friendly Incumbents
    TSTA-PAC 2018 Endorsements Primary Winners / Runoffs / Friendly Incumbents Ryan Guillen - Rio Grande City HD 31** Republican Texas Senate Eric Johnson - Dallas HD 100** Kel Seliger - Amarillo SD 31** Jarvis Johnson - Houston HD 139 Julie Johnson - Dallas HD 115 Texas House of Representatives Ina Minjarez -San Antonio HD 124 Steve Allison – San Antonio HD 121* René O. Oliveira - Brownsville HD 37* Ernest Bailes - Shepherd HD 18 Ron Reynolds - Missouri City HD 27** Keith Bell - Forney HD 4 Shawn Thierry - Houston HD 146** Travis Clardy - Nacogdoches HD 11 John Turner - Dallas HD 114 Scott Cosper - Killeen HD 54* Dan Flynn - Van HD 2 State Board of Education Charlie Geren - Fort Worth HD 99 Ruben Cortez, Jr. - Brownsville SBOE 2 Cody Harris - Palestine HD 8 Marisa B. Perez - San Antonio SBOE 3 Dan Huberty - Houston HD 127** Ken King - Canadian HD 88 General Election Early Endorsement Chris Paddie - Marshall HD 9** Texas Senate Four Price - Amarillo HD 87** Democratic John Raney - Bryan HD 14 Kirk Watson - Austin SD 14 J.D. Sheffield - Gatesville HD 59** Royce West - Dallas SD 23 Hugh Shine - Temple HD 55** Reggie Smith - Sherman HD 62 Texas House of Representatives Lynn Stucky - Sanger HD 64 Democratic Alma Allen - Houston HD 131 Rafael Anchia - Dallas HD 103 Democratic Lt. Governor Nicole Collier - Fort Worth HD 95 Mike Collier - Houston Jessica Farrar - Houston HD 148 Abel Herrero - Robstown HD 34 Texas Senate Gina Hinojosa - Austin HD 49 Beverly Powell - Tarrant SD 10 Donna Howard - Austin HD 48 Nathan Johnson - Dallas SD 16 Victoria Neave - Dallas HD 107 John Whitmire - Houston SD 15 Mary Ann Perez - Houston HD 144 Joseph C.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020-27056 / Court: 164 By: Lisa Thomas Filed: 413012020 1 0:55 PM
    413012020'10:55 PM Marilyn Burgess - District Clerk Hanis Counly Envelope No. 42675789 2020-27056 / Court: 164 By: Lisa Thomas Filed: 413012020 1 0:55 PM Cause No KHC LLC d/b/a POST OAK POKER $ IN TFIE DISTRICT COURT OF CLUB, DANIEL J. KEBORT, WILLIAM $ HEUER III, SERGIO D CABRERA, $ and ALAN CHODROW, $ $ NI.- Plaintiffi, $ \, $ \@* v $ HARRIS corrNQ{'TEXAS $ HARzuS COUNTY DISTRICT $ ATTORNEY KIM OCrG, in her $ o Official Capaciry, TIM WILSON SR., $ AMIR MIRESKANDARI in his Individual $ and Official Capacity, GREG TRAVIS $ and ALI DAVOUDI, $ $ Defendants $ JUDICIAL DISTRICT ORIGINAL o Plaintiffs KHC LLC d/b/a Post Oak ("Post Oak Poker Club"), Daniel J. Kebort, William Heuer III, Sergio D. Cabrera, an Chodrow (the "Post Oak Partners") file this Original Petition against the followi Harris County District Attorney Kim Ogg in her official capacity; Tim Wil son Mireskandari in his official and individual capacities; Greg Travis, and 1. In accountable for their respective roles in a e to extort hundreds of thousands of dollars from Plaintiffs to acquire a nonexl for municipal gaming. Defendants made false statements to Plaintiffs, threatened them, and improperly exercised the authority of the Harris County District Attorney's Office to defraud Plaintiffs and maliciously prosecute Plaintiffs' business partners and employees. When Plaintiffs refused to pay these "licensing fees," they were threatened, arrested, wrongfully prosecuted, and ultimately driven out of business, resulting in the loss of millions of dollars and the shutdown of the Post Oak Poker Club. DISCOVERY CONTROL PLAN 2. Plaintiffs intend to conduct discovery under Level 3. See Tex R Qiy.P l90.a@) ..€)' STATEMENT OF RELIEF (3): 3.
    [Show full text]
  • V. List of References
    LIST OF REFERENCES General Gambling Information Abt, V., Smith, J., and Christiansen, E. The Business of International Gaming Institute, University of Nevada, Las Risk: Commercial Gambling in Mainstream America. Vegas. The Gaming Industry: Introduction and Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas (1985). Perspectives. New York: John Wiley & Sons (1996). Minnesota Planning. Minnesota Gambling 1993. St. Paul, Blakey, G. and Kurland, H. Development of the Federal MN: Minnesota Planning (May 1993). Law of Gambling. Cornell Law Review, 63:923 (1978). Kusyszyn, Igor. “The Psychology of Gambling,” Annals of Brenner, R. and Brenner, G. Gambling and Speculation: A the American Academy of Political and Social Science Theory, a History and a Future of Some Human Decisions. 474:133-145 (July 1984). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press (1990). Public Agenda. Gambling: Is it a Problem? What Should Christiansen, E. The United States Gross Annual Wager. We Do? An Issue Book for National Issues Forums. International Gaming & Wagering Business. Dubuque, Iowa: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company (1998) Cozic, C. and Winters, P. (eds.) Gambling. San Diego, Rose, I. Gambling and the Law. Los Angeles: Gambling CA: Greenhaven Press (1995). Times (1986). Davis, Bertha. Gambling in America: A Growth Industry. Rose, I. The Impact of American Laws on Foreign Legal An Impact Book. New York: Franklin Watts (1992). Gambling, New York Law School Journal of International and Comparative Law, 8(1):129-166 (1986). Detlefsen, Robert R. Wagers of Sin. Reason, pp. 24-30 (December 1997). Rose, I. The Rise and Fall of the Third Wave: Gambling Will Be Outlawed in Forty Years. In Eadington (ed.) Detlefsen, Robert R.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Staff: 87Th Legislature
    HRO HOUSE RESEARCH ORGANIZATION Texas House of Representatives Legislative Staff 87th Legislature 2021 Focus Report No. 87-2 House Research Organization Page 2 Table of Contents House of Representatives ....................................3 House Committees ..............................................15 Senate ...................................................................18 Senate Committees .............................................22 Other State Numbers...........................................24 Cover design by Robert Inks House Research Organization Page 3 House of Representatives ALLEN, Alma A. GW.5 BELL, Cecil Jr. E2.708 Phone: (512) 463-0744 Phone: (512) 463-0650 Fax: (512) 463-0761 Fax: (512) 463-0575 Chief of staff ...........................................Anneliese Vogel Chief of staff .............................................. Ariane Marion Legislative director ................................. Adoneca Fortier Legislative aide......................................Joshua Chandler Legislative aide.................................... Sarah Hutchinson BELL, Keith E2.414 ALLISON, Steve E1.512 Phone: (512) 463-0458 Phone: (512) 463-0686 Fax: (512) 463-2040 Chief of staff .................................................Rocky Gage Chief of staff .................................... Georgeanne Palmer Legislative director/scheduler ...................German Lopez Legislative director ....................................Reed Johnson Legislative aide........................................ Rebecca Brady ANCHÍA, Rafael 1N.5
    [Show full text]
  • Texas House of Representatives Contact Information - 2017 Representative District Email Address (512) Phone Alma A
    Texas House of Representatives Contact Information - 2017 Representative District Email Address (512) Phone Alma A. Allen (D) 131 [email protected] (512) 463-0744 Roberto R. Alonzo (D) 104 [email protected] (512) 463-0408 Carol Alvarado (D) 145 [email protected] (512) 463-0732 Rafael Anchia (D) 103 [email protected] (512) 463-0746 Charles "Doc" Anderson (R) 56 [email protected] (512) 463-0135 Rodney Anderson (R) 105 [email protected] (512) 463-0641 Diana Arévalo (D) 116 [email protected] (512) 463-0616 Trent Ashby (R) 57 [email protected] (512) 463-0508 Ernest Bailes (R) 18 [email protected] (512) 463-0570 Cecil Bell (R) 3 [email protected] (512) 463-0650 Diego Bernal (D) 123 [email protected] (512) 463-0532 Kyle Biedermann (R) 73 [email protected] (512) 463-0325 César Blanco (D) 76 [email protected] (512) 463-0622 Dwayne Bohac (R) 138 [email protected] (512) 463-0727 Dennis H. Bonnen (R) 25 [email protected] (512) 463-0564 Greg Bonnen (R) 24 [email protected] (512) 463-0729 Cindy Burkett (R) 113 [email protected] (512) 463-0464 DeWayne Burns (R) 58 [email protected] (512) 463-0538 Dustin Burrows (R) 83 [email protected] (512) 463-0542 Angie Chen Button (R) 112 [email protected] (512) 463-0486 Briscoe Cain (R) 128 [email protected] (512) 463-0733 Terry Canales (D) 40 [email protected] (512) 463-0426 Giovanni Capriglione (R) 98 [email protected] (512) 463-0690 Travis Clardy (R) 11 [email protected] (512) 463-0592 Garnet Coleman (D) 147 [email protected] (512) 463-0524 Nicole Collier (D) 95 [email protected] (512) 463-0716 Byron C.
    [Show full text]