DOCSLIB.ORG

Beyond Dikes and Dunes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Beyond Dikes and Dunes Beyond dikes and dunes Research on management-related conditions to enhance the feasibility of the development of a more resilient coastal zone Carolijn Becker June 2014 Utrecht University Master Thesis Sustainable Development Beyond dikes and dunes Beyond dikes and dunes Research on management-related conditions to enhance the feasibility of the development of a more resilient coastal zone Master Thesis Sustainable Development C.L. Becker, BSc 3137481 [email protected] Supervisor: Dr. C. Dieperink Utrecht University Faculty of Geosciences 5th of June, 2014 The cover photo was taken at Vlissingen and is the author’s own material, as are all other photos unless stated otherwise. Beyond dikes and dunes Table of contents Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................................ 3 Summary ............................................................................................................................................................ 4 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 7 1.1 Problem definition: managing our coasts .......................................................................................................... 7 1.2 Social context: coastal management .................................................................................................................... 7 1.3 Paradigm shift: From protecting to adapting .................................................................................................. 8 1.4 Knowledge gap: linking coastal management theory to practice........................................................... 9 1.5 Research aim & relevance .......................................................................................................................................... 9 1.6 Research question and framework ..................................................................................................................... 10 1.7 Reading guide ............................................................................................................................................................... 11 2. Resilient coastal zones .................................................................................................................. 12 2.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................... 12 2.2 Defining the coastal zone ........................................................................................................................................ 12 2.3 Types ................................................................................................................................................................................. 13 2.4 Functions & pressures ............................................................................................................................................... 14 2.5 Defining resilience ...................................................................................................................................................... 16 2.6 Resilience in policy ...................................................................................................................................................... 17 2.7 Resilience & coastal zones ....................................................................................................................................... 19 2.8 Indicators for resilience ........................................................................................................................................... 19 2.9 Conclusion ....................................................................................................................................................................... 22 3. Coastal management ...................................................................................................................... 23 3.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................... 23 3.2 A paradigm shift towards resilience and adaptation................................................................................. 23 3.3 Integrated Coastal Zone Management .............................................................................................................. 24 3.4 National Adaptation Strategies ........................................................................................................................... 28 3.5 Building with Nature ................................................................................................................................................. 29 3.6 Conclusion ....................................................................................................................................................................... 31 4. Methods ............................................................................................................................................... 33 4.1 Success conditions ....................................................................................................................................................... 33 1 Beyond dikes and dunes 4.2 Case studies .................................................................................................................................................................... 34 4.3 Document analysis ...................................................................................................................................................... 37 4.4 Key actor interviews .................................................................................................................................................. 37 4.5 Interview questions .................................................................................................................................................... 37 4.6 Survey ............................................................................................................................................................................... 38 5. Results ................................................................................................................................................. 39 5.1 Case 1: the Sand Engine ....................................................................................................................... 39 5.1.1 Building the Sand Engine..................................................................................................................................... 39 5.1.2 Stakeholders and their responsibilities ......................................................................................................... 40 5.1.3 Process of the Sand Engine ................................................................................................................................. 41 5.1.4 Success conditions ................................................................................................................................................... 42 5.2 Case 2: Southwest Walcheren ........................................................................................................... 49 5.2.1 Weak Links ................................................................................................................................................................. 49 5.2.2 Stakeholders and their responsibilities ......................................................................................................... 50 5.2.3 Success conditions ................................................................................................................................................... 51 5.3 Survey: the other Weak Links ........................................................................................................... 57 5.4 Case study comparison: Sand Engine vs. Southwest Walcheren .......................................... 59 5.5 Conclusion: a new conditions list .................................................................................................... 62 6. Discussion .......................................................................................................................................... 63 6.1 Refined list of success conditions ......................................................................................................................... 63 6.2 Latest research ............................................................................................................................................................. 64 6.3 Limitations ..................................................................................................................................................................... 66 7. Conclusion .................................................................................................................................................. 67 7.1 Research question ....................................................................................................................................................... 67 7.2 Management-related conditions for a more resilient coastal zone ...................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Coastal Dynamics 2017 Paper No. 156 513 How Tides and Waves
    Coastal Dynamics 2017 Paper No. 156 How Tides and Waves Enhance Aeolian Sediment Transport at The Sand Motor Mega-nourishment , 1,2 1 1 Bas Hoonhout1 2, Arjen Luijendijk , Rufus Velhorst , Sierd de Vries and Dano Roelvink3 Abstract Expanding knowledge concerning the close entanglement between subtidal and subaerial processes in coastal environments initiated the development of the open-source Windsurf modeling framework that enables us to simulate multi-fraction sediment transport due to subtidal and subaerial processes simultaneously. The Windsurf framework couples separate model cores for subtidal morphodynamics related to waves and currents and storms and aeolian sediment transport. The Windsurf framework bridges three gaps in our ability to model long-term coastal morphodynamics: differences in time scales, land/water boundary and differences in meshes. The Windsurf framework is applied to the Sand Motor mega-nourishment. The Sand Motor is virtually permanently exposed to tides, waves and wind and is consequently highly dynamic. In order to understand the complex morphological behavior of the Sand Motor, it is vital to take both subtidal and subaerial processes into account. The ultimate aim of this study is to identify governing processes in aeolian sediment transport estimates in coastal environments and improve the accuracy of long-term coastal morphodynamic modeling. At the Sand Motor beach armoring occurs on the dry beach. In contrast to the dry beach, no armor layer can be established in the intertidal zone due to periodic flooding. Consequently, during low tide non-armored intertidal beaches are susceptible for wind erosion and, although moist, may provide a larger aeolian sediment supply than the vast dry beach areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Dynamics 2017 Paper No
    Coastal Dynamics 2017 Paper No. 157 INTEGRATED MODELLING OF THE MORPHOLOGICAL EVOLUTION OF THE SAND ENGINE MEGA-NOURISHMENT Arjen Luijendijk1,2, Rufus Velhorst1, Bas Hoonhout1,2, Sierd de Vries1, and Rosh Ranasinghe2,3 Abstract This study presents some recent developments in coastal morphological modeling focusing on flexible meshes, flexible coupling between models operating at different time scales, and a recently developed morphodynamic model for the intertidal and dry beach. This integrated modeling approach is applied to the Sand Engine mega nourishment in The Netherlands to illustrate the added-values of this integrated approach. A seamlessly coupled modeling system for Delft3D and AeoLiS has been developed and applied to compute the first years of evolution of the Sand Engine, both for the subaqueous and subaerial areas. The subaqueous bed level changes have been computed with the new Flexible Mesh version of Delft3D, resulting in comparable accuracy levels as to the standard Delft3D version. The integrated morphodynamic prediction of both subaqueous and subaerial reveals a qualitative behavior which is very similar to observations. Model results confirm that after the first year after construction the sand supply for aeolian transports is predominantly from the intertidal area. The AeoLiS model results indicate a significant intertidal erosion volume of about 230,000 m3 over the five year period, which is a not to be neglected volume, especially in multiyear or decadal predictions. Interestingly, the model results show that the spit, developed by the wave-related processes, is also subject to aeolian transports acting on the emerged spit during lower tides. The seamlessly coupled models are now able to combine the dry beach behaviour with subaqueous morphodynamic evolution, which is important in medium-term to decadal morphodynamic predictions but also relevant for designing such sandy solutions incorporating lakes, lagoons, and relief.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of the Sand Engine on the Sediment Transports And
    The influence of the Sand Engine on the sediment transports and budgets of the Delfland coast Analysis of bi-monthly high-resolution coastal profiles L.W.M. Roest Master thesis Hydraulic Engineering Front cover: Aerial photograph of the Sand Engine with Scheveningen in the background. Taken on 16 February 2016, by Rijkswaterstaat/Jurriaan Brobbel, https://www.flickr.com/photos/zandmotor/25106436435/ Back cover: Aerial photograph of the Sand Engine looking to the South. Taken on 16 February 2016, by Rijkswaterstaat/Jurriaan Brobbel, https://www.flickr.com/photos/zandmotor/25080093026/ The influence of the Sand Engine on the sediment transports and budgets of the Delfland coast Analysis of bi-monthly high-resolution coastal profiles Master Thesis For the degree of Master of Science in Civil Engineering at Delft University of Technology To be publicly defended on 17th August 2017 L.W.M. Roest 10th August 2017 Graduation committee: prof.dr.ir. S.G.J. Aarninkhof Delft University of Technology dr.ir. S. de Vries Delft University of Technology dr.ir. M.A. de Schipper Delft University of Technology dr. M.F.S. Tissier Delft University of Technology An electronic version of this thesis is available at http://repository.tudelft.nl/ Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences (CEG) · Delft University of Technology Abstract The Sand Engine is a new innovation in coastal protection, a mega feeder nourishment. This pilot project was constructed in 2011 along the Delfland coast, which is historically prone to erosion. Since its construction, the Sand Engine is intensively being monitored to track the morphological development. The objective of this thesis is therefore to assess how the morphology of the Sand Engine is evolving over time and how this evolution contributes to the sediment budgets of the Delfland coast.
    [Show full text]
  • Observations of the Sand Engine Pilot Project
    Coastal Engineering 111 (2016) 23–38 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Coastal Engineering journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/coastaleng Initial spreading of a mega feeder nourishment: Observations of the Sand Engine pilot project Matthieu A. de Schipper a,b,⁎, Sierd de Vries a, Gerben Ruessink c, Roeland C. de Zeeuw b, Jantien Rutten c, Carola van Gelder-Maas d, Marcel J.F. Stive a a Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Department of Hydraulic Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands b Shore Monitoring and Research, The Hague, The Netherlands c Faculty of Geosciences, Department of Physical Geography, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands d Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment (Rijkswaterstaat), Lelystad, The Netherlands article info abstract Article history: Sand nourishments are a widely applied technique to increase beach width for recreation or coastal safety. As the Received 10 July 2015 size of these nourishments increases, new questions arise on the adaptation of the coastal system after such large Received in revised form 19 October 2015 unnatural shapes have been implemented. This paper presents the initial morphological evolution after imple- Accepted 30 October 2015 mentation of a mega-nourishment project at the Dutch coast intended to feed the surrounding beaches. In Available online xxxx total 21.5 million m3 dredged material was used for two shoreface nourishments and a large sandy peninsula. The Sand Engine peninsula, a highly concentrated nourishment of 17 million m3 of sand in the shape of a Keywords: fi Alongshore feeding sandy hook and protruding 1 km from shore, was measured intensively on a monthly scale in the rst 18 months Mega nourishment after completion.
    [Show full text]
  • Building with Nature in Search of Resilient Storm Surge
    Nat Hazards (2013) 65:947–966 DOI 10.1007/s11069-012-0342-y CONCEPTUAL NOTE TO THE EDITOR Building with Nature: in search of resilient storm surge protection strategies E. van Slobbe • H. J. de Vriend • S. Aarninkhof • K. Lulofs • M. de Vries • P. Dircke Received: 29 September 2011 / Accepted: 1 August 2012 / Published online: 13 September 2012 Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012 Abstract Low-lying, densely populated coastal areas worldwide are under threat, requiring coastal managers to develop new strategies to cope with land subsidence, sea- level rise and the increasing risk of storm-surge-induced floods. Traditional engineering approaches optimizing for safety are often suboptimal with respect to other functions and are neither resilient nor sustainable. Densely populated deltas in particular need more resilient solutions that are robust, sustainable, adaptable, multifunctional and yet eco- nomically feasible. Innovative concepts such as ‘Building with Nature’ provide a basis for coastal protection strategies that are able to follow gradual changes in climate and other environmental conditions, while maintaining flood safety, ecological values and socio- economic functions. This paper presents a conceptual framework for Building with Nature E. van Slobbe (&) Alterra, Wageningen University and Research Centre, PO Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands e-mail: [email protected] H. J. de Vriend EcoShape Foundation/Deltares/Delft University of Technology, Burgemeester de Raadtsingel 69, 3311 JG Dordrecht, The Netherlands S. Aarninkhof EcoShape Foundation/Royal Boskalis, Burgemeester de Raadtsingel 69, 3311 JG Dordrecht, The Netherlands K. Lulofs School of Management and Governance, University of Twente, PO Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands M.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring En Evaluatie Pilot Zandmotor Fase 2 Evaluatie Benthos, Vis, Vogels En Zeezoogdieren 2010 - 2014
    Monitoring en Evaluatie Pilot Zandmotor Fase 2 Evaluatie benthos, vis, vogels en zeezoogdieren 2010 - 2014 J.W.M. Wijsman, R. van Hal en R.H. Jongbloed Deltares project 1205045-000 IMARES project 4303103201 © Deltares, 2015 Titel Monitoring en Evaluatie Pilot Zandmotor - Fase 2 Evaluatie benthos, vis, vogels en zeezoogdieren 2010 - 2014 Opdrachtgever Project Kenmerk Pagina's Rijkswaterstaat Water, 1205045-000 1205045-000-ZKS-0107 109 Verkeer, Leefomgeving IMARES C125/15 Trefwoorden Zandmotor, benthos, vis, vogels, zeezoogdieren, evaluatie. Samenvatting Dit document beschrijft de resultaten van de tussentijdse evaluatie voor het onderdeel ecologie van monitoring en evaluatieproject Zandmotor. In deze evaluatie zijn de hypothesen getoetst aan de hand van de veldgegevens die zijn verzameld in de periode 2010 tot en met 2014. Deze evaluatie is een opmaat voor de evaluatie die in 2016 zal worden uitgevoerd aan het eind van Fase II van dit project. De meest recente gegevens voor bodemdieren en vis die zijn meegenomen in deze evaluatie dateren van het najaar van 2013. De Zandmotor bestond toen al 2 jaar. De analyses laten duidelijke patronen zien die mede zijn veroorzaakt door de aanwezigheid van de Zandmotor. Zo is er in de beschutte gebieden in en rond de Lagune een specifieke bodemdiergemeenschap aangetroffen die niet wordt aangetroffen in de meer geëxponeerde gebieden. Aanvankelijk was de beschutte lagune ook een geschikt gebied voor juveniele schol, maar waarschijnlijk vanwege de invang van organisch rijk slib in de lagune is dit snel minder geworden. De stranden van de lagune zijn wel een interessant gebied geworden voor steltlopers, meeuwen en aalscholvers. De verwachting is dat de meer geleidelijke sedimentatie (over een periode van 20 jaar) van het zand van de Zandmotor aan de stranden en de vooroever zullen leiden tot een andere bodemdiergemeenschap ten opzichte van de bodemdiergemeenschap die iedere 3-5 jaar wordt verstoord door een reguliere suppletie.
    [Show full text]
  • Sand Engine Quells the Coast's Hunger for Sand
    Sand engine quells the coast's hunger for sand « former article | content | next article » Category: Science An artificial peninsula at Ter Heijde is designed to feed the coast with sediment. Scientists are investigating whether this kind of sand engine could be the Netherlands’ answer to rising sea levels. Thomas van Dijk At the foot of the dunes in the coastal resort of Ter Heijde, Matthieu de Schipper and Sierd de Vries carefully cross the sand in their four-wheel drive vehicle. The dunes here have recently been reinforced. Neat lines of beach grass protrude from the sand at intervals of some 30 cm. “Pretty different to what you get with the sand engine,” says De Schipper. Through the other window he points to where we are heading: a massive hook-shaped expanse of sand extending 1 km out to sea. “The waves, sea current and wind are creating all kinds of gullies and bays around the sand engine. It’s wonderful to let nature do her work.” “Building with nature” has now become the watchword for hydraulic engineering. It’s also the theme of the PhD research that De Schipper and his colleague, De Vries, are working on. The two researchers from the faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences (CEG) are regular visitors to this peninsula. “We come to count the grains of sand,” De Schipper jokes. This sand engine provides the hydraulic engineers with a superb testing ground. Last year, dredging companies Van Oord and Boskalis used trailer suction hopper dredgers to deposit 21.5 million cubic metres of sand here.
    [Show full text]
  • Sand Nourishments
    SAND NOURISHMENTS Delta Fact CONTENT • Introduction • Related topics and Delta Facts • Strategy: working with nature • Schematic • Technical characteristics • Alternatives to beach nourishment • Governance • Costs and benefits • Lessons learned and ongoing study • Knowledge gaps • References/links • Experiences INTRODUCTION Beaches and dunes play an important role in the protection and maintenance of coastal areas by attenuating wave energy, preventing floods and reducing erosion. Physical interventions can lead to a reduction in sediment supply locally or elsewhere on the coast and hence to the deterioration of the natural function. Recharge or nourishment of dunes, intertidal or nearshore areas with sediment can restore the functions of the coastal area. At the same time, nourishments may enhance the associated habitat value and (ecosystem) functions. Nourishments are a more natural coastal defence option than ‘hard alternatives’ such as concrete seawalls, rock revetments, timber groynes, offshore breakwaters, etc. This fact sheet deals with the nourishment of beaches using sand. Sand nourishments are the mechanical placement of sand in the coastal zone to advance the shoreline or to maintain the volume of sand in the littoral system. It is a measure to stabilize the shoreline and support the flood or erosion protection function of the coast (Wesenbeeck et al, 2012). It maintains the historical landscape of the coastline, while hard measures (seawalls, breakwaters, etc.) may change the coastline significantly. Also, sand nourishment may increase the recreational value of the beach and dunes. Since sand nourishment keep natural gradients (wet-dry, salt-fresh, shallow-deep) intact, the coastal ecosystem will benefit (Marchand et al, 2012). Besides marine coastal areas, sand nourishments are also applied on lake coasts.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 “ SAND ENGINE “ : BACKGROUND and DESIGN of a MEGA-NOURISHMENT PILOT in the NETHERLANDS Jan P.M. Mulder1,2,3 and Pieter Ko
    “ SAND ENGINE “ : BACKGROUND AND DESIGN OF A MEGA-NOURISHMENT PILOT IN THE NETHERLANDS Jan P.M. Mulder1,2,3 and Pieter Koen Tonnon1 Coastal policy in the Netherlands is characterised by three scale levels. The smallest scale is aimed at the preservation of safety agaisnt flooding by maintaining a minimum dune strength; the middle- and large scales at preservation of sustainable safety and of functions in the coastal zone by maintaining the coast line, respectively the sand volume in the coastal foundation. The definition of three scales basically implies a pro-active approach, based on the idea that the larger scale sets boundary conditions for the smaller scale. This pro-active approach appears to be succesful: nourishments since 1990 not only have resulted in maintaining the coast line, but also in an extension of the dunes, contributing to an increased safety against flooding. The succes has been achieved by a yearly nourishment volume of 12 Mm3. Recent studies have indicated the need to upscale the yearly averaged nourishment volume. A recent update of the sediment balance of the coastal foundation shows a negative total of ca. 20 Mm3 per year; so apparently 12 Mm3 nourishments per year is insufficient to maintain the total active sand volume of the system. Besides, in a study on future adaptation options to climate change in the Netherlands, the authoritive Deltacommissie (2008) even recommends a raise of nourishment budgets up to 85 Mm3/year until the year 2050, taking into account an ultimate worst case scenario of a sea level rise of 13 cm in 2100.
    [Show full text]
  • Building with Nature” in Complex Governance Situations
    16 Terra et Aqua | Number 124 | September 2011 ERIK VAN SLOBBE AND KRIS LULOFS IMPLEMENTING “BUILDING WITH NATURE” IN COMPLEX GOVERNANCE SITUATIONS ABSTRACT The second aspect is the growing sense of INTRODUCTION uncertainty actors experience as a result of Two governance aspects of modern coastal the longer time horizons of projects and as The place is Hindeloopen, a small town on engineering which seem to be of importance a consequence of the integration of a growing the IJsselmeer coast in the North of the to many coastal projects all over the world are number of functions to be served by the Netherlands. It is April 2011. There is a tense considered here. Reflections on these two projects (including ecological ones). The atmosphere in the room. Inhabitants reiterate aspects are related to the context in which question is: how to deal with this uncertainty? their objections to the sand nourishment. projects take place. The first is the fragmen- Their spokesperson presents a formal protest tation of decision-making and funding. The cases presented in this paper were letter. They have seen too many failing studied in the innovation programme Building interventions to improve the coast. They do These types of projects usually involve many with Nature, which runs from 2008 till the not want to gamble on the risk of another actors who need to collaborate in one way end of 2012. It is funded from different failure. They depend for their livelihood on or another. In order to understand how these sources, amongst which the Subsidieregeling recreation and new sand may destroy collaborations are constructed, the way in Innovatie keten Water (SIW), sponsored by the swimming and surfing conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Pioneering Sand Motor the Sand Motor As Source to Rethink Anthropogenic Coastal Modifications in Cultural Public Space
    Pioneering Sand Motor 149 The Sand Motor as source to rethink anthropogenic coastal modifications in cultural public space Jacqueline Heerema Satellietgroep, artists collective DOI 10.47982/rius.7.132 Abstract Now that people all around the world are slowly starting to rethink how humanity and the planet are interrelated, new questions have arisen around 150 the understanding of time and the perception of place. It’s not merely a RIUS 7: technical or a political challenge that we are facing, it is also a cultural one. The BUILDING WITH NATURE PERSPECTIVES NATURE WITH BUILDING Sand Motor - as the first of its kind - uses the forces of the wind and waves as active agengies of change, but can it be valued as a driving force for humanity to change as well? Drawing from primary artistic research of the sea, coastal transitions, climate change and human appropriations in The Netherlands and abroad, we can state that the ephemeral nature of the Sand Motor itself challenges a polyphonic discourse for co-creation of experiential knowledge. The Sand Motor can be perceived as a man-made intervention in public space, an open- air, publicly accessible research site. Over the past 10 years, Satellietgroep redefined the Sand Motor as a cultural phenomenon, connecting the Sand Motor to the realms of art, culture, and heritage. This essay discusses a series of human-inclusive art projects, in which the Sand Motor evolves from a non-place into a vital learning environment for the cross-pollination of ideas and experimentations to rethink culture and nature. They demonstrate that pioneering with the Sand Motor should include pioneering with the social and cultural values of this artifact, not only to raise public and professional climate- consciousness, but also to adopt it as a human-inclusive landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sand Engine
    The Sand Engine Arjen Luijendijk Coastal Engineer / Researcher Paradigm shift in Delta Infrastructure • From: Building in Nature • Via: Building of Nature • To: Building with Nature • Eastern Scheldt storm • Maasvlakte 2 Rotterdam • Sand Engine surge barrier (1986) port extension (2008) (2011) The heart of the matter Building with Nature, a design process that : • Integrates nature and development goals • Uses natural processes • Creates added value for nature and society Building with Nature solutions soft solutions hard solutions Temperate Pilot Sand Motor IJsselmeer ES: oyster reefs Eastern Scheldt Delfland Coast foreshore nourishment as shore protection Underwater garden Tropical Coastal protection BwN design Singapore Coastal protection Singapore Sea grass Labrador Park Mangroves ‘rich levee’ focus on focus on ecosystem infrastructure functioning development Sand Engine Delfland NL Coastline Holland Coast • Decrease of natural sediment supply owing to - Sea level rise - Human interventions • Consequence: Structural erosion • Solution: Nourishments Beach nourishment Shoreline retreat Egmond (1679 – 1996) Anticipating Climate Change effects Dynamic preservation of the 1990 coastline Sand volumes: • Since 1990: 6 mln m3/yr • Since 2001: 12 mln m3/yr Prospect future since 2008: 40Tendency-85 mln m towards3/yr !! larger-scale nourishments Uncertainties on environmental effects Need for space (nature & recreation) Challenge for Province Shortage on natural recreation areas How can ambitions by realised? Challenge for the Ministry of Public
    [Show full text]