DOCSLIB.ORG

Heritage Statement Unit 11, Nos

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Heritage Statement Unit 11, Nos Heritage Statement Unit 11, Nos. 23-25 Mill Street, London, SE1 2BE Acumen UK Solutions Ltd March 2021 CONTENTS Chapter: Page: 1.0 Introduction 1 2.0 The Relevant Heritage Assets 2 3.0 The Significance of the Heritage Assets 4 4.0 Impact Assessment 12 5.0 Conclusions 16 1.0 Introduction 1.1 This Heritage Statement has been prepared on behalf Acumen UK assets affected, including any contribution made by their setting. Solutions Ltd in respect to applications for planning and Listed The level of detail should be proportionate to the assets’ Building Consent for the change of use with internal alterations to importance and no more than is sufficient to understanding the form a residential dwelling (the ‘proposed development’) at Unit potential impact of the proposals on their significance. As a 11, Nos. 23-25 St. Saviour’s Dock, Mill Street, London (the minimum the relevant historic environment record should have ‘application site’). been consulted and the heritage assets assessed using appropriate expertise where necessary. Where a site on which development is 1.2 From a heritage perspective the application site forms part of a proposed includes, or has potential to include, heritage assets with grade II listed building. It is located in the St. Saviour’s Dock archaeological interest, local planning authorities should require Conservation Area and is within the settings of a cluster of listed developers to submit an appropriate desk-based assessment and, buildings that enclose the dock and the western side of Mill Street. where necessary, a field evaluation.” (NPPF Paragraph 189) 1.3 In determining the proposals Southwark Council, as the local 1.5 Given the above legislative and policy requirements Chapter 2 of planning authority (LPA), has a series of ‘statutory duties’ under the this Heritage Statement identifies the relevant heritage assets that Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 to could be affected by the proposal. Chapter 3 describes the have special regard to the desirability of preserving the listed significance of the heritage assets, proportionate to the potential buildings or their settings or any features of special architectural or impact of the proposed development. Chapter 4 provides an historic interest that they possess and also to pay special attention assessment of that potential impact and Chapter 5 makes a series to the desirability of preserving or enhancing the character and of conclusions with reference to the relevant legislation and policy appearance of conservation areas. requirements. 1.4 National planning policy in respect to the conservation of the historic environment is set out in the National Planning Policy Framework (revised 2019) (NPPF) and places the following requirements on applicants: “In determining applications, local planning authorities should require an applicant to describe the significance of any heritage 1 2.0 The Relevant Heritage Assets Introduction Table 2.1: Listed buildings relevant to the application site: 2.1 The NPPF defines a heritage asset as follows: Listed Building: Grade: “A building, monument, site, place, area or landscape identified as Nos. 23 and 25 St. Saviour’s Wharf II having a degree of significance meriting consideration in planning decisions, because of its heritage interest. It includes designated 2.5 Nos. 23 and 25 Mill Street form part of a group of listed buildings heritage assets and assets identified by the local planning authority that enclose the western side of Mill Street and the dock of St. (including local listing).” Saviour’s Wharf to the rear of Mill Street. Given the modest scale of the proposed internal alterations it is highly unlikely that the Designated Heritage Assets special interest of the adjoining listed buildings would be affected. However, for completeness the following listed buildings are referred to in Chapter 3 in respect to the group value of the 2.2 The NPPF confirms that designated heritage assets comprise, World application site: Heritage Sites, scheduled monuments, listed buildings, protected wreck sites, registered parks and gardens, registered battlefields • Vogan’s Mill, No. 17 Mill Street (Grade II Listed). and conservation areas. • New Concordia Wharf, South Block, No. 27 Mill Street (Grade II 2.3 The designated heritage assets that are relevant in considering the Listed). proposed development are identified below: • New Concordia Wharf, North-east Block with Water Tower and Chimney (Grade II Listed). • New Concordia Wharf. St. Saviour’s Block Range (Grade II Listed Buildings: Listed). 2.4 Listed buildings are designated for their special architectural or Conservation Areas: historic interest in accordance with the DCMS Principles for Selection of Listed Buildings (2010). The listed building identified in Table 2.1 are relevant with respect to the proposed development: 2.6 Conservation areas are areas of special architectural or historic interest the character or appearance of which it is desirable to 2 preserve or enhance (Section 69 of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990). 2.7 The application site is located within the St. Saviour’s Dock Conservation Area. Non-Designated Heritage Assets 2.8 Historic England guidance in Decision-Taking in the Historic Environment Good Practice Advice Note 3 (2015) advises that non- designated heritage assets may be identified through the following mechanisms: “Non-designated heritage assets include those that have been identified in a Historic Environment Record, in a local plan, through local listing or during the process of considering the application.” 2.9 Southwark Council has published a Draft Local List however it does not include heritage assets in Mill Street or St. Saviour’s Wharf. Given the concentrations of designated heritage assets associated with St. Saviour’s Wharf, the tightly enclosed character of Mill Street and the extent and form of the proposed development a HER search has not been considered necessary to inform this Heritage Statement. 3 3.0 The Significance of the Heritage Assets Introduction an asset in its setting is also influenced by other environmental factors such as noise, dust and vibration from other land uses in the 3.1 The NPPF defines significance (for heritage policy) as: vicinity, and by our understanding of the historic relationship between places.” “The value of a heritage asset to this and future generations because of its heritage interest. The interest may be archaeological, 3.4 Historic England guidance on The Setting of Heritage Assets Historic architectural, artistic or historic. Significance derives not only from Environment Good Practice Advice in Planning Note 3 (Second a heritage asset’s physical presence, but also from its setting. For Edition, 2017) confirms that: World Heritage Sites, the cultural value described within each site’s Statement of Outstanding Universal Value forms part of its “Setting is not itself a heritage asset, nor a heritage designation, significance.” although land comprising a setting may itself be designated. Its importance lies in what it contributes to the significance of the 3.2 The setting of a heritage asset is defined by the NPPF as follows: heritage asset or to the ability to appreciate that significance.” “The surroundings in which a heritage asset is experienced. Its 3.5 The description of the significance of the heritage assets, provided extent is not fixed and may change as the asset and its below, is proportionate to their importance and the likely impact of surroundings evolve. Elements of a setting may make a positive or the proposed development on their significance, including their negative contribution to the significance of an asset, may affect the setting. ability to appreciate that significance or may be neutral.” 3.3 The National Planning Practice Guide (NPPG) further advises, that: “The extent and importance of setting is often expressed by reference to visual considerations. Although views of or from an asset will play an important part, the way in which we experience 4 Nos. 23-25 St. Saviour’s Wharf, Mill Street (Grade II Figure 3.1: John Rocques Plan of London (1766) Listed) (https://geo.southwark.gov.uk) Special Architectural and Historic Interest 3.6 Unit 11 occupies part of the 1st Floor of the former warehouse, which the list entry describes as follows: “Warehouse, now residential and business units. C. 1860. Stock brick with plain parapet with copying. 6 storeys, symmetrical 9-bay front with 3 hatch ranks (now balconies) with yellow bull-nosed reveals. Entranceways either side of central hatch rank on ground floor have segmental, gauged-brick arches and yellow bull-nosed reveals. Pairs of windows each side of hatch ranks with segmental, gauged-brick arches. 5th floor has 2 cast-iron pivot hoists with arched braces and circular bracing to spandrels. Drain pipes slightly recessed. Interior: rebuilt to include internal courtyards; some Figure 3.2: St. Saviour’s Dock (1827) (https://www.british-history original beams and cast-iron columns. Good sequence with .ac.uk) adjoining New Concordia Wharf buildings and group value with a range of wharf buildings in Mill Street.” 3.7 The mouth of the River Neckinger first provided access to the C11th Bermondsey Abbey and was later named St. Saviour’s Dock. The Conservation Area Appraisal (Southwark Council, 2003) confirms that it was fully enclosed with buildings by the beginning of the C17th. The street pattern of Shad Thames and Mill Street was identifiable on John Rocques Plans of London during the mid C18th and the dock was enclosed by an organic late Medieval townscape. 5 Figure 3.3: Greenwood’s Map of London of 1830 illustrates a series Figure 3.4: Ordnance Survey Map (1872) (1:2,500) of deep blocks between Mill Street and St. Saviour’s Dock 3.9 Following the development of the adjoining warehouses the 3.8 The townscape enclosing the western side of Mill Street was western side of Mill Street remained largely unchanged.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 140 Ilderton Road, South Bermondsey, London SE15 1TW
    Archaeological Desk Based Assessment Land at 62 Hatcham Road and 134 - 140 Ilderton Road, South Bermondsey, London SE15 1TW NGR: TQ 35188 77929 Site Code: HRIR19 September 2019 TOUCHSTONE ARCHAEOLOGY The Ridings, White Elm Road, Danbury, Essex CM3 4LR Tel: 07976 275180 E: [email protected] www.touchstonearchaeology.co.uk © Touchstone Archaeology 2017 all rights reserved DOCUMENT CONTROL GRID Land at 62 Hatcham Road and 134 - 140 Ilderton Road, South Bermondsey, Project Name London SE15 1TW Author(s) Zoe Schofield Origination date September 2019 Reviser(s) Zoe Schofield Date of last revision Version V.01 Summary of N/A changes Client Reference HRIR19 Archaeological Desk Based Assessment in advance of the proposed development on the site of Land at 62 Hatcham Road and 134 - 140 Ilderton Road, South Bermondsey, London SE15 1TW Table of Contents 1 SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................................. 5 2 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 7 2.1 STUDY AREA ........................................................................................................................................................... 7 2.2 SCOPE OF DOCUMENT ........................................................................................................................................... 7 3 THE SITE ..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 5.3 Heritage Statement
    Thames Tideway Tunnel Thames Water Utilities Limited Application for Development Consent Application Reference Number: WWO10001 Appendix K Heritage Statement Doc Ref: 5.3 Appendix K APFP Regulations 2009: Regulation 5(2)(m) Hard copy available in Box 14 Folder B January 2013 This page intentionally left blank Heritage Statement i Thames Tideway Tunnel Heritage Statement Appendix K: Shad Thames Pumping Station List of contents Page number K.1 Site location and context ................................................................................. 1 Historical context ........................................................................................................ 2 K.2 Relevant local heritage policy and guidance ................................................. 2 K.3 Description of heritage assets and significance summary .......................... 5 Shad Thames Pumping Station and Superintendent’s House .................................... 5 Wheat Wharf ............................................................................................................... 8 Tower Bridge Conservation Area ................................................................................ 8 Anise Warehouse ....................................................................................................... 8 Archaeology ................................................................................................................ 8 Significance summary ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Statement Elephant & Castle Town Centre
    PLANNING STATEMENT DP9 LTD August 2016 Planning Statement Elephant & Castle Town Centre CONTENTS PAGE NO. 1.0 INTRODUCTION 2 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION 6 3.0 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 12 4.0 PRE-APPLICATION CONSULTATION 19 5.0 REGENERATION AND COMMUNITY BENEFITS 23 6.0 PLANNING POLICY ASSESSMENT 25 7.0 PRINCIPLE OF DEVELOPMENT 28 8.0 EXISTING USES 36 9.0 COMMERCIAL USES 39 10.0 LEISURE AND EDUCATIONAL USES 43 11.0 RESIDENTIAL USE 46 12.0 DESIGN MATTERS 51 13.0 TRANSPORT AND ACCESS 57 14.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS 65 15.0 DRAFT SECTION 106 HEADS OF TERMS 76 16.0 CONCLUSION 77 1 Planning Statement Elephant & Castle Town Centre 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 This Planning Statement has been prepared by DP9 Ltd to accompany the application for planning permission submitted on behalf of Elephant and Castle Properties Co. Limited (hereafter referred to as the ‘Applicant’) for the proposed Elephant & Castle Town Centre development (hereafter referred to as the ‘Proposed Development’). The Application 1.2 Detailed planning permission is sought for the phased mixed use redevelopment of Elephant and Castle Shopping Centre site (hereafter referred to as the ‘East Site’) and the London College of Communication (LCC) site (hereafter referred to as the ‘West Site’). The East and West Sites comprise the overall ‘Application Site’. The Application Site is 3.56ha and is located within the London Borough of Southwark (LBS). 1.3 The Description of Development proposed is as follows: “Phased mixed use redevelopment of the existing Elephant and Castle Shopping Centre and
    [Show full text]
  • May 2019 Joint Prehistoric Society and LAMAS Lecture: the Battersea Channel – a Hidden Landscape, Mark Stevenson, Historic England
    CONTENTS Page Notices 2 Reviews and Articles 6 Conferences and Events 19 Affiliated Society Meetings 19 NOTICES Newsletter: Copy Date Please note that the final copy deadline for the September 2019 Newsletter is 19 July 2019. Please send items for inclusion by email preferably (as MS Word attachments) to: [email protected], or by surface mail to me, Richard Gilpin, Honorary Editor, LAMAS Newsletter, 84 Lock Chase, Blackheath, London SE3 9HA. It would be greatly appreciated if contributors could please ensure that any item sent by mail carries postage that is appropriate for the weight and size of the item. LAMAS History Editor Wanted The position of History Editor of the Society’s Transactions is vacant. This unpaid post will be attractive to a person interested in promoting and assisting the publication of articles about London history in the journal. Full support is given by the Publications Committee, which meets three times a year in central London. If you are interested, please contact the Chair of the Publications Committee, John Schofield, at [email protected]. LAMAS Lecture Programme 2018-2019 Unless otherwise stated, meetings take place in the Clore Learning Centre at the Museum of London on Tuesday evenings at 6.30pm – refreshments from 6pm. Meetings are open to all; members may bring guests. Non- members are welcome and are asked to donate £2 towards lecture expenses. The following is the remaining lecture in the 2018-2019 programme. Details of the 2019-2020 programme will appear in the September Newsletter. 2 14 May 2019 Joint Prehistoric Society and LAMAS lecture: The Battersea Channel – a hidden landscape, Mark Stevenson, Historic England.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Resources, Drainage and Flood Risk, Both at the Site and in the Immediate Surrounding Area
    13 Water Resources, Drainage & Flood Risk Introduction 13.9 Some waterbodies are designated as ‘artificial’ or ‘heavily modified’ and are not able to achieve near natural conditions. The classification of these waterbodies and the biology they represent are measured against ‘ecological potential’ 13.1 This chapter of the Environmental Statement (ES) has been prepared by Ardent Consultant Engineers (Ardent) and rather than status. For these waterbodies to reach good potential their chemistry must be good and the structural addresses the impact of the proposed 128-150 Blackfriars Road development (hereafter referred to as the ‘proposed nature of the waterbody, which harms the biology, must be essential for its valid use. These are included in the baseline development’) on Water Resources, Drainage and Flood Risk, both at the site and in the immediate surrounding area. It assessment. should be noted that due to the considerable overlap between the two subject areas, some of the impacts relating to National Legislation the hydrogeology underlying the site are also dealt with in Chapter 14: Ground Conditions of this ES. The Water Resources Act 1991 & Water Act 2003 13.2 This chapter describes the methods used to identify the baseline conditions at the proposed development site and within the surrounding area. Key water resources and receptors and their importance are identified and the assessment 13.10 The Water Resources Act 1991 (as amended) (Ref. 13-3) sets out the relevant regulatory controls that provide addresses the potential impacts of the proposed development on these resources. Consideration of impacts is made in protection to water bodies and water resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Thresholds: Engineering and Literature East of the City1
    Thresholds: Engineering and Literature East of the City1 Michael Hattaway Sir Walter Besant, he who ‘discovered’ the East End,2 reminds us that the area now known as Docklands was originally marshland – and there is nothing more liminal than a marsh. ‘Wapping’, he wrote, ‘was called Wapping in the Wose [Marsh] … Bermondsey was Bermond’s Island’. Names further west also recall the extent of the Thames before embankment: ‘Battersea was Batte’s Island … Chelsea was the Island of Chesel or Shingle; Westminster Abbey was built on the Isle of Thorns.’3 These names delivered an enduring challenge of reclamation. Living near marshes was dangerous, especially near a tidal river like the Thames: in 1573 Thomas Tusser had advised, ‘Marsh wall too slight, strength[en] now or good night’.4 Much later Dickens wrote of a London beleaguered by the ‘great marsh forces of Essex and Kent’.5 Out of such realities potent myths were forged. Like Venice, London immediately east of the Tower was totally man-made – but scarcely as an artefact. The air and water were fetid, the latter contaminated not only by the sewage that concentrated itself in more slow-flowing parts of the Thames to the east, but also by the skin trading, tan-pits, and glue-yards of Bermondsey. Yet, despite these disadvantages, and following the construction of the docks at the beginning of the nineteenth century, the area had been rapidly built up – with a conspicuous dearth of the parks and commons found in the other quarters of London. As in Venice, on land ‘nature’ was invisible.
    [Show full text]
  • Background Info on Dorothea Smartt Poems
    Background information on Dorothea Smartt’s poems for the Signature Ventilation Columns, commissioned by Tideway Dorothea Smartt’s poems for the Signature Ventilation Columns (SVC) relate to tales of people living or working near or on one of London’s Lost Rivers. Below is background information on the stories and histories that inspired each poem. The SVC site is listed, followed by the opening few words from the poem and some information. Also listed is the Lost River connected to the site and the century that the poem’s story relates to. King George’s Park, London Borough Swimming Association's long distance of Wandsworth swimming championship or 'Women's Thames Swim'. The championship took place between Putney and Kew. It is said ‘On watchful Wandle walks…’ that some of the women jumped in feet- first, rather than diving, because they The poem references Corporal Edward didn't want to risk swallowing any of the Foster, a Wandsworth-born First World dirty Thames water. War hero, who was awarded the Victoria Cross. He was also honoured by having a Lost River Beverly Brook path near the River Wandle and King Date of narrative: 20th Century (1921) George’s park named after him (Foster's Way). Corporal Foster VC came from working class roots and, after the war, became a dustman. The poem also Cremorne Wharf Depot, Royal Borough references local industry around the of Kensington and Chelsea Wandle, including the Ram Brewery. ‘Chelsea terrace chants…’ Lost River Wandle Date of narrative: 20th Century The poem references the large crowds of Chelsea football fans walking to Stamford Bridge stadium.
    [Show full text]
  • Walworth Road Historic Area Assessment
    WALWORTH ROAD HISTORIC AREA ASSESSMENT ISSUE REVISION A 27 JUNE 2015 REVISION B 23 AUG 2015 COMPILED BY THE WALWORTH SOCIETY Architectural Investigation: Diana Cochrane & The Walworth Society Walworth ROAD HISTORIC AREA ASSESSMENT SUMMARY SUMMARY The collection of terraces that border the road were This HAA seeks to define the architectural and historic Walworth is an inner-city area in south London with constructed by early developers after the 1774 Act of interest of Walworth and in particular the Walworth Road. It a densely built-up townscape. It developed as a Parliament which permitted house building using local clay. builds on relatively few existing studies to provide context village in its own right, separate from Newington and enhanced understanding at a time when the area (now the Elephant & Castle) and has been in The Walworth Road tells the complete story of retail and high is subject to significant change most obviously from the existence as a Manor and Parish since Anglo Saxon street development in inner London, standalone Georgian redevelopment of the site of the former Heygate Estate in times. The Romans knew about the Walworth area terraces (late C18th), Georgian standalone and terraced the northern part of the Walworth Road, the redevelopment as it lies between two Roman Roads: Stane Street houses converted to shops by filling their gardens (early/ of the Elephant & Castle and the redevelopment of the (Newington Butts, Kennington Lane) and Watling mid C19th), the birth of a vigorous street market and the Aylesbury Estate to the south. Street (Tabard Street). Mostly marshland, the road subsequent redevelopment of Victorian and Edwardian south to Camberwell was laid along higher ground mansion blocks designed with integrated shops (late C19th, CONTRIBUTORS as a route to the village of Dulwich, with a branch to early C20th), the arrival of the early chain stores and banks The fieldwork and research for the assessment has been Peckham, terminating near Croydon.
    [Show full text]
  • June Newsletter Issue 20
    CONFRATERNITY OF PILGRIMS TO ROME NEWSLETTER JUNE 2014 No. 20 Contents 3 Editorial Alison Raju and Chris George 4 Over the Border we go… Harry Bucknall 8 Albert the Abbot and the Via Romea Stein Thue 14 Getting to Canterbury to start the Via Francigena is not as easy as it seems… Marion Marples 17 Recipes along the Via Francigena (2) Bronwyn Marques 20 Obtaining the Testimonium 22 The Rome of Robert Garry Ridgway 24 Additions to the CPR Library, January to July 2014 Margaret Simonot 24 Secretary's Notebook Bronwyn Marques 2 Editorial This is the twentieth issue of the Confraternity of Pilgrims to Rome's Newsletter. (An index to the artices and book reviews published in issues numbers 11 to 20 will appear in issue #21.) There are six articles, a list of additions to the CPR library and the section entitled “Secretary's Notebook,” containing short items of information likely to be of interest to our members. Harry Bucknall describes the Swiss part of his journey from London to Rome, after which Stein Thue discusses another pilgrim route to Rome, the Via Romea Stadensis from northern Germany, first taken by the Abbot Albert von Stade in the year 1236. Bronwyn Marques presents the second in a series of “Recipes along the Via Francigena,” with two from northern France, after whch Marion Marples presents the options open to the pilgrim wishing to walk to Canterbury to begin his/her journey to Rome. This is followed by advice on how to obtain the Testimonium once the pilgrim has arrived in Rome and then Garry Ridway’s personal appreciation of books about the Eternal City.
    [Show full text]
  • Prose Studies
    This article was downloaded by: [Goldsmiths, University of London] On: 04 June 2014, At: 04:18 Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Prose Studies: History, Theory, Criticism Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/fprs20 Winstanley and Baptist Thought Ariel Hessayon Published online: 28 May 2014. To cite this article: Ariel Hessayon (2014) Winstanley and Baptist Thought, Prose Studies: History, Theory, Criticism, 36:1, 15-31, DOI: 10.1080/01440357.2014.914749 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01440357.2014.914749 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the Content. This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • St Saviours Wharf Shad Thames • Se1 St Saviours Wharf Shad Thames • Se1
    ST SAVIOURS WHARF SHAD THAMES • SE1 ST SAVIOURS WHARF SHAD THAMES • SE1 An oppertunity to purchase an exceptional lateral warehouse conversion in a historic Shad Thames development Packed with period features including original beams and exposed brick work, this charming three bedroom apartment has an abundance of character throughout. The extremely spacious open plan living area leads onto two separate balconies overlooking the river Neckinger. The property includes three good sized double bedrooms, two of which have en suite facilities and all include an ample amount of storage in the form of built in wardrobes. The apartment also features a separate terrace area, ideal for al fresco entertaining. The apartment benefits from secure gated parking for one car and concierge. 3 bedrooms, 3 bathrooms, reception area, kitchen. two balconies and terrace. EPC rating D. 3 bedrooms • 2 bathrooms Reception room • Kitchen Ulitiy room • Storage • W/C Terrace • Two balconies LOCATION St Saviours Wharf is among the most prominent riverside warehouse conversions in Shad Thames, offering a wealth of character and history. Located by the river Thames in the heart of Shad Thames, moments away from the hustle and bustle of the local shops, bars and restaurants. 0.9 miles from London Bridge Station with excellent underground and over ground access to the City of London, Canary Wharf, West End and further afield. TERMS Local Authority: Borough of Southwark Guide price: £1,850,000 VIEWING By appointment through Knight Frank 020 3837 1520 First Floor Important Notice 1. Particulars: These particulars are not an offer or contract, nor part of one.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeological Desk Based Assessment |
    Archaeological Desk Based Assessment __________ 185 Tower Bridge Road, London Borough of Southwark SE1 2UF February 2020 | Project Ref AC01282A Archaeological Desk Based Assessment | Author with date Reviewer code, with date AJ, 18.02.2020 RD-0021, 18.02.2020 Project Number: 01282A File Origin: M:\Archaeology Collective\Projects\Projects 1001-1500\Projects 1201- 1300\01282 - 185 Tower Bridge Rd\01282A\Reports\1282-185 Tower Bridge Road DBA v.2.docx 185 Tower Bridge Road: Archaeological Desk-Based Assessment | 2 Contents Non-Technical Summary 1. Introduction ........................................................................................ 6 2. Methodology ...................................................................................... 11 3. Relevant Policy Framework ............................................................... 16 4. Archaeological Background ............................................................... 23 5. Proposed Development and Potential Effects..................................... 38 6. Conclusions ....................................................................................... 42 Sources consulted……………………………………………………………………..43 Figures Proposed Development 185 Tower Bridge Road: Archaeological Desk-Based Assessment | 3 Non-Technical Summary This archaeological desk-based assessment has been prepared by Archaeology Collective, on behalf of Nanda Construction Limited to inform proposals to redevelop a vacant plot of land situated on the west side of Tower Bridge Road, Bermondsey, in the London
    [Show full text]