DOCSLIB.ORG

Us Dept. of the Interior, Office of Surface Mining

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Us Dept. of the Interior, Office of Surface Mining TECHNICAL MEASURES FOR THE INVESTIGATION AND MITIGATION OF FUGITIVE METHANE HAZARDS IN AREAS OF COAL MINING Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement Appalachian Regional Coordinating Center Pittsburgh, PA September 2001 Kenneth K. Eltschlager, Mining Engineer, OSM Jay W. Hawkins, Hydrologist, OSM William C. Ehler, Geologist, OSM Fred Baldassare, Hydrogeologist, PA DEP PREFACE Explosive levels of methane are occasionally a problem near or in homes, wells, and other structures. The methane can be generated or liberated from active or abandoned underground mining that is occurring or has occurred underneath or adjacent to these structures. The methane may also come from other sources such as oil wells, gas wells, wetlands, landfills, and septic systems. The Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM) recognizes that hazardous situations may occasionally be caused by current or past coal mining. Methane is not specifically regulated under the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (Act). However, the Act at Section 521(a)(2) states that “When... any condition or practices exist which condition, practice, or violation also creates an imminent danger to the health and safety of the public the secretary shall immediately order a cessation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations or the portion thereof relevant to the condition, practice, or violation.” Methane at explosive levels is an imminent danger. Thus, when methane related to active coal mining causes an imminent harm situation, OSM or the State regulatory authority has the responsibility to act. The Act also addresses abandoned mine lands (AML) at Section 410(a): “ The Secretary is authorized to expend moneys from the fund for the emergency restoration, reclamation, abatement, control, or prevention of adverse effects of coal mining practices... if...(1) an emergency exists constituting a danger to the public health, safety, or general welfare...” Methane accumulation in or near homes from abandoned mines can pose a safety risk and therefore warrants action. Other Federal and State agencies may have comparable responsibilities. However, little compiled literature exists on how to determine when methane levels pose an imminent harm or safety problem or on how to locate the source. This document gathers, summarizes, and references the literature to facilitate future methane evaluations. OSM provides this manual as a public service. While the primary target guidance of this document is government scientists, geologists, and engineers, it should also be helpful to the public and industry representatives. Glenda Owens Acting Director PURPOSE Fugitive methane is the uncontrolled release of methane into the atmosphere. It may create an imminent harm to the public or private property. Ultimately, methane should not be allowed to accumulate to explosive levels in wells or structures. This document outlines testing and evaluation protocols for methane in wells, dwellings and soils near coal mines and recommends when action is prudent to prevent or mitigate methane accumulation. These technical guidelines to evaluate fugitive methane are established to: T evaluate the scope of the problem, T define investigative procedures, T develop sampling protocols, T assess hazard potential, and T delineate potential mitigation techniques. Disclaimer Nothing in this manual is a substitute for thoughtful and thorough investigative procedures in circumstances involving a potentially serious methane problem. This manual is intended to provide guidance regarding methane and is solely for the benefit of the users. No duties, rights, or benefits, substantive or procedural, are created or implied by this manual. The contents of this manual are not enforceable by any person or entity against the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement or the United States. Acknowledgments This document was compiled under the guidance of the Methane Work Group. The group was convened by OSM and comprised the following members: Tim Dieringer (Co-Chairman) OSM Kenneth K. Eltschlager (Co-Chairman) OSM Jay W. Hawkins OSM Willam C. Ehler OSM Lois Uranowski OSM John Craynon OSM Fred Baldassare Pennsyvania Department of Environmental Protection Jay Winter Pennsyvania Department of Environmental Protection Lynn Haynes Virginia Department of Mined Land Reclamation JoAnn Erwin West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection Rick Chancellor Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality Lowell Braxton Utah Department of Natural Resources Edward Miller Mine Safety and Health Administration Jim Ulery National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health The following individuals donated their time to peer review parts or all of the manual: Peter J Hutchinson, The Hutchinson Group, Ltd. R. J. Porter Environmental Monitoring, Inc. Dennis D. Coleman Isotech Laboratories, Inc. Jack C. Pashin Geologic Survey of Alabama Dan T. Chafin U. S. Geological Survey OSM wishes to thank the participants for the time and effort spent in compiling this document. TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION I CHARACTERISTICS AND OCCURRENCE OF METHANE 1.0 INTRODUCTION ....................................................5 2.0 GAS CHARACTERISTICS ............................................7 2.1..............................................................7 2.2 Physical Properties of Gases ......................................8 2.3 Methane Gas Properties .........................................12 3.0 HAZARDOUS EFFECTS OF METHANE ................................14 3.1 Explosive Gases ...............................................15 3.2 Toxic gases ..................................................17 3.3 Asphyxiant Gases .............................................18 4.0 GEOLOGIC ENVIRONMENT OF METHANE ...........................18 4.1 Methane Storage ..............................................20 4.2 Migration Pathways ............................................21 4.3 Coalbed Lithology .............................................22 4.4 Methane in Coal ...............................................23 5.0 FUGITIVE METHANE SOURCES .....................................25 5.1 Gas Wells and Transmission Lines ................................25 5.2 Landfills .....................................................25 5.3 Coal Mines ...................................................25 6.0 HAZARD POTENTIAL .............................................31 6.1 Preliminary Assessment of Potential Hazard .........................31 6.2 Comprehensive Assessment of Potential Hazard: .....................32 6.3 Post-Mitigation Assessment .....................................33 SECTION II ACTION LEVELS FOR METHANE CONCENTRATIONS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...................................................34 2.0 ATMOSPHERIC METHANE ..........................................35 2.1 Explosibility of Methane Mixtures ................................35 2.2 Regulatory Standards for Methane in Atmospheres ...................35 2.3 Literature on Methane Levels in the Atmosphere ....................36 2.4 Recommended Action Levels - Atmospheric ........................36 3.0 METHANE IN WATER ..............................................37 3.1 Explosibility of Methane in Water ................................37 3.2 Literature on Methane in Water ..................................38 3.3 Regulatory Standards for Dissolved Methane in Water ................40 3.4 Recommended Action Levels - Methane in water ....................40 4.0 METHANE IN SOILS ................................................40 4.1 Explosibility of Methane in the Vadose Zone .......................40 4.2 Literature Search ..............................................41 4.3 Reference regulatory standards for methane in vadose zone .............41 SECTION III INVESTIGATIVE PROCEDURES 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...................................................49 2.0 PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION ....................................49 2.1 Test for Atmospheric Methane ...................................50 2.2 Interview the Land Owner/Tenant .................................51 2.3 Observe Site Conditions ........................................52 2.4 Action .......................................................53 3.0 COMPREHENSIVE INVESTIGATION .................................53 3.1 Historical Information/Data ......................................53 3.2 Detailed Site Reconnaissance ....................................54 3.3 Field Measurements and Sampling ................................56 4.0 SOURCING OF METHANE ..........................................65 4.1 Gas Wells ....................................................67 4.2 Collection, Transmission, and Distribution Lines .....................67 4.3 Landfills .....................................................68 4.4 Abandoned Mines .............................................69 4.5 Active Mines .................................................70 SECTION IV PROTOCOL FOR METHANE SAMPLING AND GAS ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...................................................72 2.0 TESTING FOR ATMOSPHERIC METHANE ............................72 2.1 Portable Equipment ............................................72 2.2 Sample Containers .............................................74 2.3 Laboratory Equipment ..........................................75 2.4 Sampling Methodology - Atmospheric Methane ......................75 3.0 TESTING FOR METHANE IN WELLS .................................76 3.1 Portable Equipment ............................................77
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Biogas for Agriculture
    2007 IGER INNOVATIONS Biogas for agriculture Phil Hobbs, Alastair Ward and Guillermo Pardo Biogas feedstock 44 Current research 44 2007 IGER INNOVATIONS Biogas for agriculture Phil Hobbs, Alastair Ward and Guillermo Pardo he production of biogas as a fuel obtained from Biogas feedstock B I the fermentation of organic wastes has undoubted O Livestock manure slurry is the main source of G A Tbenefits for the environment . These benefits include feedstock for biogas production, having a dry matter S F both reduced methane emissions from livestock content of about 5 -15% w/w, but potentially a wide O R enterprises and the production of green energy which range of organic wastes can be used as starter A G can be fed into the national electricity grid. The heat materials, ranging from fats and greases to vegetable R I C generated from biogas production can also be used wastes . Some potential sources, such as food and U L T locally for heating livestock buildings or hot water. abattoir wastes , would need to be heat -treated before U R E Biogas is about 70% methane and 30% CO 2. The use as a biogas feedstock as a biosecurity measure, actual methane producers are microbes known as however, in order to prevent any contained ‘methanogens ’. These belong to some of the oldest pathogens escaping to reinfect farm livestock via groups of organisms on the planet , known as the grazing or other crop sources. Organic wastes Archaea . They are common in wetlands, where they imported onto the farm are also a good source of are responsible for producing marsh gas , and are also nutrients for spreading on the land and can commonly found in the gut of ruminants such as significantly reduce artificial fertiliser use , both cattle, and in their faeces .
    [Show full text]
  • Blending Hydrogen Into Natural Gas Pipeline Networks: a Review of Key Issues
    Blending Hydrogen into Natural Gas Pipeline Networks: A Review of Key Issues M. W. Melaina, O. Antonia, and M. Penev NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC. Technical Report NREL/TP-5600-51995 March 2013 Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 Blending Hydrogen into Natural Gas Pipeline Networks: A Review of Key Issues M. W. Melaina, O. Antonia, and M. Penev Prepared under Task No. HT12.2010 NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC. National Renewable Energy Laboratory Technical Report 15013 Denver West Parkway NREL/TP-5600-51995 Golden, Colorado 80401 March 2013 303-275-3000 • www.nrel.gov Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States government or any agency thereof.
    [Show full text]
  • Atmospheric Gases Student Handout Atmospheric Gases
    Atmospheric Gases Student Handout Atmospheric Gases Driving Question: What is our atmosphere made of? In this activity you will: 1. Explore the variety and ratio of compounds and elements that make up the Earth’s atmosphere. 2. Understand volumetric measurements of gases in the atmosphere. 3. Visually depict the composition of the atmosphere. Background Information: Understanding Concentration Measurements In this activity, we will investigate the gas composition of our planet’s atmosphere. We use percentages to represent units of gas composition. A percent (%) is equivalent to 1 part out of 100 equal units. 1% = 1 part out of 100 For smaller concentrations scientists use parts per million (ppm) to represent concentrations of gases (or pollutants) in the atmosphere). One ppm is equivalent to 1 part out of 1,000,000 if the volume being measured is separated into 1,000,000 equal units. 1 ppm = 1 part out of 1,000,000 In this activity, you will use graph paper to represent the concentration of different gases in the atmosphere. Copyright © 2011 Environmental Literacy and Inquiry Working Group at Lehigh University Atmospheric Gases Student Handout 2 Here are some examples to help visualize parts per million: The common unit mg/liter is equal to ppm concentration Four drops of ink in a 55-gallon barrel of water would produce an "ink concentration" of 1 ppm. 1 12-oz can of soda pop in a 30-meter swimming pool 1 3-oz chocolate bar on a football field Atmospheric Composition Activity You will be creating a graphic model of the atmosphere composition using the Atmospheric Composition of Clean Dry Air activity sheet.
    [Show full text]
  • Tracer Applications of Noble Gas Radionuclides in the Geosciences
    To be published in Earth-Science Reviews Tracer Applications of Noble Gas Radionuclides in the Geosciences (August 20, 2013) Z.-T. Lua,b, P. Schlosserc,d, W.M. Smethie Jr.c, N.C. Sturchioe, T.P. Fischerf, B.M. Kennedyg, R. Purtscherth, J.P. Severinghausi, D.K. Solomonj, T. Tanhuak, R. Yokochie,l a Physics Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois, USA b Department of Physics and Enrico Fermi Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, USA c Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, New York, USA d Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences and Department of Earth and Environmental Engineering, Columbia University, New York, USA e Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA f Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, USA g Center for Isotope Geochemistry, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, USA h Climate and Environmental Physics, Physics Institute, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland i Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, USA j Department of Geology and Geophysics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA k GEOMAR Helmholtz Center for Ocean Research Kiel, Marine Biogeochemistry, Kiel, Germany l Department of Geophysical Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, USA Abstract 81 85 39 Noble gas radionuclides, including Kr (t1/2 = 229,000 yr), Kr (t1/2 = 10.8 yr), and Ar (t1/2 = 269 yr), possess nearly ideal chemical and physical properties for studies of earth and environmental processes. Recent advances in Atom Trap Trace Analysis (ATTA), a laser-based atom counting method, have enabled routine measurements of the radiokrypton isotopes, as well as the demonstration of the ability to measure 39Ar in environmental samples.
    [Show full text]
  • Muck: Causes and Corrective Actions1 Mark V
    FA200 A Beginner’s Guide to Water Management—Muck: Causes and Corrective Actions1 Mark V. Hoyer, Daniel E. Canfield, Jr. and Mark Brenner2 This publication was produced by: Florida LAKEWATCH 2017 UF/IFAS School of Forest Resources and Conservation / Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 7922 NW 71st Street Gainesville, Florida 32653-3071 Phone: 352/392-4817 FAX: 352/392-3672 E-mail: [email protected] Website: http://lakewatch.ifas.ufl.edu Copies are available for download from the LAKEWATCH website: http://lakewatch.ifas.ufl.edu/data.shtml Muck from pond at Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Gainesville, FL. Credits: Mark Hoyer, UF/IFAS Introduction Informational Circular 112 Muck is both the popular and the scientific term for the material found on the bottom of many depressions that Florida LAKEWATCH have held water for any length of time. It is of great impor- tance to many recreational lake users because its presence UF/IFAS Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences can ruin their enjoyment of the water body. Its dark color School of Forest Resources and Conservation and “oozy” feel lead many people to believe muck could be Gainesville, Florida an indicator of a polluted system. January 2017 Another cause for people’s distaste for muck is the stink. Bacterial decomposition of the organic matter in muck 1. This document is FA200, one of a series of the School of Forest Resources and Conservation Program in Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, UF/IFAS Extension. Original publication date February 2017. Visit the EDIS website at http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu. 2. Mark V. Hoyer, director, Florida LAKEWATCH, UF/IFAS Program in Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences of the School of Forest Resources and Conservation; Daniel E.
    [Show full text]
  • Equation of State for Natural Gas Systems
    Equation of State for Natural Gas Systems. m A thesis submitted to the University of London for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy and for the Diploma of Imperial College by Jorge Francisco Estela-Uribe. Department of Chemical Engineering and Chemical Technology Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine. Prince Consort Road, SW7 2BY London, United Kingdom. March 1999. Acknowledgements. I acknowledge and thank the sponsorship I received from the following institutions: Fundacion para el Futuro de Colombia, Colfiituro; Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Seccional Cali; the Committee of Vice-Chancellors and Principal of the Universities of the United Kingdom and Ruhrgas AG. Without their economic support my stay in London and the completion of this work would have been impossible. My greatest gratitude goes to my Supervisor, Dr Martin Trusler. His expert guidance and advice were always fundamental for the success of this research. He helped me with abundant patience and undying commitment and his optimism regarding the possibilities of the project was always inspirational for me. He also worked shoulder by shoulder with me on solving a good number of experimental problems, some of them were just cases of bad luck and for some prominent ones, I was the only one to blame. Others helped me willingly as well. My labmate, Dr Andres Estrada-Alexanders, was quite helpful in the beginning of my research, and has carried on being so. He not only did do well in his role as the senior student in the laboratory, but also became a good fnend of mine. Another good friend of mine, Dr Abdel Fenghour, has always been an endless source of help and information.
    [Show full text]
  • Odors, Explained
    OdorCap Information Sheet Unique Odors w/ Encapsulation Technology Several Distinctive Odors Explained Hydrogen sulfides Gas This is the by-product of anaerobic activity. This anaerobic activity survives very well in low oxygen levels or no oxygen levels of the sewer water or the sewer transmission lines. This is the main reason to try and remove this type of bacteria from the sewer lines being in the water or the line. These levels can even become dangerous to personnel working and living around the area. Low levels Hydrogen sulfide has a very strong odor and can be smelled at levels as low as 0.005 - 0.02 parts per million (ppm). Higher levels may cause an offensive, rotten-egg odor, and can irritate eyes, nose, and throat. The lungs and nasal passages may also become inflamed. Eyes may become sore and watery. Your throat may itch, and you may start to cough. Long-term health effects of low-level hydrogen sulfide exposure are unknown. High levels At levels above 100 ppm, hydrogen sulfide is very dangerous. The gas loses its odor by overpowering the sense of smell and begins to affect the whole body. At 250 ppm, a person my quickly lose consciousness. They may experience powerful stinging of the eyes, throat, and suffer from severe lung inflammation. At 500 ppm and higher, people can have convulsions, respiratory arrest, and heart failure. High exposure levels may also cause permanent brain damage. According to the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), hydrogen sulfide is a leading cause of sudden death from workplace chemical exposure.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a Basics of Landfill
    APPENDIX A BASICS OF LANDFILL GAS Basics of Landfill Gas (Methane, Carbon Dioxide, Hydrogen Sulfide and Sulfides) Landfill gas is produced through bacterial decomposition, volatilization and chemical reactions. Most landfill gas is produced by bacterial decomposition that occurs when organic waste solids, food (i.e. meats, vegetables), garden waste (i.e. leaf and yardwaste), wood and paper products, are broken down by bacteria naturally present in the waste and in soils. Volatilization generates landfill gas when certain wastes change from a liquid or solid into a vapor. Chemical reactions occur when different waste materials are mixed together during disposal operations. Additionally, moisture plays a large roll in the speed of decomposition. Generally, the more moisture, the more landfill gas is generated, both during the aerobic and anaerobic conditions. Landfill Gas Production and Composition: In general, during anaerobic conditions, the composition of landfill gas is approximately 50 percent methane and 50 percent carbon dioxide with trace amounts (<1 percent) of nitrogen, oxygen, hydrogen sulfide, hydrogen, and nonmethane organic compounds (NMOCs). The more organic waste and moisture present in a landfill, the more landfill gas is produced by the bacteria during decomposition. The more chemicals disposed in a landfill, the more likely volatile organic compounds and other gasses will be produced. The Four Phases of Bacterial Decomposition: “Bacteria decompose landfill waste in four phases. The composition of the gas produced changes with each of the four phases of decomposition. Landfills often accept waste over a 20-to 30-year period, so waste in a landfill may be undergoing several phases of decomposition at once.
    [Show full text]
  • The Verlot Peat Area Was Investigated by Rigg, Ac­ Thick
    188 PEAT RESOURCES OF WASHINGTON Verlot peat area and the layer of fibrous peat and muck under it was 4 feet The Verlot peat area was investigated by Rigg, ac­ thick. companied by C. E. Torrence and D. Tunstall, August Lake Ketchum peat area 13 to 15, 1926. The following description is based on field The Lake Ketchum peat area (19 acres) 1s m secs. 6 notes made at that time, supplemented by some explana­ and 7, T. 32 N., R. 4 E., about 3 miles north of East Stan­ tions. wood by State Highway IE and a crooked dead-end road The peat area was estimated at 15 to 20 acres. Its loca­ up a steep slope. The deposit borders the north shore tion was estimated to be about 2 miles south of the old of the lake (map, fig. 193). The lake and the topography Mackie statio~ (an abandoned sawmill) on the old of the region surrounding it are shown on the Mount Monte Cristo Branch (now abandoned) of the Northern Vernon quadrangle. The elevation of the peat is about 175 Pacific Railway. The location of Mackie is shown on feet above sea level, and it is less than 2 miles from the Forest Service maps of the Snoqualmie National Forest. shore of Skagit Bay. It lies in a depression in glacial The peat is probably in sec. 25 or 36, T. 30 N., R. 8 E. It drift of the region. The lake has no surface outlet. On was reached from the station by a rather steep, rocky wet the soil map of Snohomish County (Anderson et al., 1947) trail which extended over the mountainous region and the area is mapped as Gre~nwood peat and Carbondale down to the Pilchuck River.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of CO2 Ratio on Emissions of Dual Fuel Diesel Engine Ilker Turgut Yilmaz*, Metin Gumus
    International Journal of Smart Grid and Clean Energy Effects of CO2 ratio on emissions of dual fuel diesel engine Ilker Turgut Yilmaz*, Metin Gumus Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculy of Technology, Marmara University, DB-103, Göztepe Campus 34722, İstanbul Turkey Abstract The problem of energy consumption is growing because of the increase in population. Energy demand is commonly supplied by the fossil fuels however they bring up against the problem of run out. Biogas is a renewable fuel which is a candidate for duel fuel diesel engines. This work focuses on the effect of carbon dioxide on exhaust emission characteristics of a duel fuel diesel engine run on synthetic biogas. Four cylinder, water cooled, turbocharged, a diesel engine with Common Rail fuel injection system is used for this investigation. A simple mixing chamber is placed between inlet manifold and air filter. Experiments have been conducted at 1750 rpm under different loads (50 N.m, 75 N.m and 100 N.m). Main fuels used in this investigation are methane, M60:C40 and M80:C20 in dual fuel mode. In dual fuel mode using biogas increases hydrocarbon, nitrogen oxide and carbon dioxide emissions. Soot emission decrease in duel fuel mode. In the light of experimental data, it is understood that electronic control unit of the diesel engine cannot manage dual fuel mode. Original electronic control unit have to be reprogrammed. Keywords: Biogas, dual fuel diesel engine, emissions 1. Introduction Internal combustion engines (IC) generate power not only vehicles but also other needs. To produce power for vehicles, locomotives, marine, irrigation, production electricity, IC engines need fuel.
    [Show full text]
  • Alkaline Activated Carbon As Adsorbents of Hydrogen Sulfide Gases from Chimney of Phosphoric Units
    Journal(of(Materials(and(( J. Mater. Environ. Sci., 2018, Volume 9, Issue 9, Page 2686-2691 Environmental(Sciences( ISSN(:(2028;2508( http://www.jmaterenvironsci.com! ! CODEN(:(JMESCN( ! Copyright(©(2018,((((((((((((((((((((((((((((( University(of(Mohammed(Premier(((((( (Oujda(Morocco( ! Alkaline activated carbon as adsorbents! of hydrogen sulfide gases from chimney of phosphoric! units S. Louhichi 1,2*, A. Ghorbel 3, A. Takfaoui 4, !H. Chekir 2, N. Trabelsi 2, S. Khemakhem 1 1 Laboratory of Sciences of Materials and Environment, University! of Sfax, Faculty of Sciences of Sfax, Km 4 Soukra St.. P.O. Box 3038, Sfax, Tunisia 2 : Scientific Research Department- Gabes, Tunisian Chemical Group 3 : Laboratory of heterocyclic chemistry, Natural products and reactivity, Faculty of Sciences of Monastir, Tunisia 4 : LCAE, Faculté des Sciences, Université Mohammed Premier, BP: 524,.60 000, Oujda, Morocco ! ! Abstract Received 12 Feb2017, ! Revised 09 May 2017, Activated carbon has been used for many years for the adsorption of gases from Accepted 13 May 2017 natural gas streams, carbon! dioxide, and sewage vents. However, in many agricultural countries, agricultural by-products are often the problem of environmental pollution ! and affect human health. H2S in biogas is very toxic and corrode the equipment. Keywords ! Therefore, there is a critical need for expanding research involving removal of H2S from biogas. Some methods were studied so far: adsorption, absorption, permeation ! "! Alkaline activated through membrane. In this theme, we did recycle of activated carbon used for waste carbon water treatment’s application! .Four alkaline solution based KOH with different ratios "! Hydrogen sulfide were applied to impregnate activated carbon. The hydrogen sulfide used for "! Adsorption application was taken from! a purge at the chimney of phosphoric units.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Gas Compressibility Factor Correlation Evaluation for Niger Delta Gas Fields
    IOSR Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering (IOSR-JEEE) e-ISSN: 2278-1676,p-ISSN: 2320-3331, Volume 6, Issue 4 (Jul. - Aug. 2013), PP 01-10 www.iosrjournals.org Natural Gas Compressibility Factor Correlation Evaluation for Niger Delta Gas Fields Obuba, J*.1, Ikiesnkimama, S.S.2, Ubani, C. E.3, Ekeke, I. C.4 12Petroleum/Gas, Engineering/ University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria 3Department of Petroleum and Gas Engineering University of Port Harcourt Port Harcourt, Rivers State. 4Department of Chemical Engineering Federal University of Technology Oweri, Imo State Nigeria. Abstract: Natural gas compressibility factor (Z) is key factor in gas industry for natural gas production and transportation. This research presents a new natural gas compressibility factor correlation for Niger Delta gas fields. First, gas properties databank was developed from twenty-two (22) laboratory Gas PVT Reports from Niger Delta gas fields. Secondly, the existing natural gas compressibility factor correlations were evaluated against the developed database (comprising 22 gas reservoirs and 223 data sets). The developed new correlation was used to compute the z-factors for the four natural gas reservoir system of dry gas, solution gas, rich CO2 gas and rich condensate gas reservoirs, and the results were compared with some exiting correlations. The performances of the developed correction indicated better statistical ranking, good graph trends and best crossplots parity line when compared with correlations evaluated. From the results the new developed correlation has the least standard error and absolute error of (stdEr) of 1.461% and 1.669% for dry gas; 6.661% and 1.674% for solution; 7.758% and 6.660% for rich CO2 and 7.668% and 6.661 % for rich condensate gas reservoirs.
    [Show full text]