DOCSLIB.ORG

View Annual Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
View Annual Report Annual Report 2016 Annual Report 2016 Contents OMV Petrom Group – at a glance Company 2 Highligths 12 Statement of the Chief Executive Officer 14 OMV Petrom objectives and strategy 20 Sustainability / non-financial statement 26 OMV Petrom shares 29 Business environment Business segments 32 Upstream 38 Downstream Oil 41 Downstream Gas Report of the governing bodies 44 Report of the Supervisory Board 49 Consolidated Directors’ report 60 Corporate governance report 71 Corporate governance statement 83 Declaration of the management 84 Abbreviations and definitions Consolidated financial statements and notes 88 Independent auditor‘s report 97 Consolidated statement of financial position 99 Consolidated income statement 100 Consolidated statement of comprehensive income 101 Consolidated statement of changes in equity 102 Consolidated statement of cash flows 104 Notes to the consolidated financial statements 185 Consolidated report on payments to governments OMV Petrom Group in figures 2016 Note: In this report, “the Company”, “OMV Petrom”, “OMV Petrom Group” and “the Group” are sometimes used for convenience where references are made to OMV Petrom S.A. and its subsidiaries in general. The financials presented in the report are audited and represent OMV Petrom Group’s consolidated results prepared according to IFRS; all the figures refer to OMV Petrom Group unless otherwise stated. Figures may not add up due to rounding differences. OMV Petrom Group – at a glance 2014 2015 2016 Sales (RON mn) 1 21,541 18,145 16,247 EBITD (RON mn) 8,145 6,231 4,933 EBIT (RON mn) 3,338 (530) 1,469 Net income / (loss) attributable to stockholders (RON mn) 2 2,103 (676) 1,043 Clean CCS EBITD (RON mn) 3 8,596 6,493 5,093 Clean CCS EBIT (RON mn) 3 5,202 2,522 1,694 Clean CCS net income / (loss) attributable to stockholders (RON mn) 2, 3 3,764 1,801 1,162 Balance sheet total (RON mn) 43,125 41,118 41,414 Total equity (RON mn) 27,005 25,688 26,706 Net debt / (cash) (RON mn) 890 1,286 (237) Cash flow from operating activities (RON mn) 6,830 5,283 4,454 Capital expenditure (RON mn) 6,239 3,895 2,575 Free cash flow (RON mn) 1,172 329 1,559 ROACE (%) 7.6 (2.2) 4.1 Clean CCS ROACE (%) 3 13.6 6.5 4.5 Equity ratio (%) 63 62 64 Gearing (%) 3 5 n.m. EPS (RON/share) 0.0371 (0.0119) 0.0184 Clean CCS EPS (RON/share) 3 0.0665 0.0318 0.0205 Dividend (RON/share) 0.0112 0 0.015 4 Payout ratio (%) 30 0 81 4 Total proved reserves as of December 31 (mn boe) 690 647 606 Total hydrocarbon production (mn boe) 65.82 65.19 63.74 thereof crude oil and NGL production (mn bbl) 30.94 30.43 29.15 thereof natural gas production (bcm) 5.34 5.32 5.29 Gas sales volumes (TWh) 47.7 51.4 50.4 thereof to third parties 44.3 45.2 43.9 Net electrical output (TWh) 1.3 2.7 2.9 Petrobrazi refinery utilization rate (%)5 89 88 89 Total refined product sales (mn t) 4.81 5.03 4.93 thereof retail sales (mn t) 6 2.37 2.53 2.56 Number of filling stations 780 788 783 Employees as of December 31 16,948 16,038 14,769 LTIR per one million hours worked for own employees 0.47 0.23 0.25 7 1 Sales excluding petroleum excise tax 2 After deducting net result attributable to non-controlling interests 3 Clean CCS figures exclude special items and inventory holding effects (current cost of supply – CCS effects) resulting from Downstream Oil. 4 Dividend subject to GMS approval on April 25, 2017 5 After the finalization of the Petrobrazi refinery modernization, the opportunity was taken to demonstrate the maximum throughput based on a timeframe of the best 30 consecutive days. As a result, the annual refining capacity has been updated from 4.2 mn t to 4.5 mn t as of 2015; previously reported figures for 2014 were not adjusted accordingly. 6 Retail sales volumes include sales via Group’s filling stations in Romania, Bulgaria, Serbia and Moldova. Figures also reflected wholesales in Moldova until end-2015, when reporting changed; historical figures were not adjusted accordingly. 7 Indicator under EY audit – might suffer modifications. OMV Petrom is the largest integrated oil and gas group in Southeastern Europe and the leading industrial company in Romania. The company is organized in three operationally integrated business segments – Upstream, Downstream Oil and Downstream Gas. In Upstream, OMV Petrom is present in Romania and Kazakhstan. The Downstream Oil portfolio comprises the 4.5 mn t/y capacity Petrobrazi refinery, which can process OMV Petrom’s entire Romanian equity crude oil, as well as a 783 filling station network operated via two brands, Petrom and OMV, located in Romania, Moldova, Bulgaria and Serbia. The Downstream Gas segment is the company’s sole gas marketing channel. The Downstream Gas portfolio comprises the 860 MW gas fired power plant Brazi and the 45 MW wind park Dorobanțu. Upstream Downstream Oil Downstream Gas Onshore oil Onshore Offshore natural gas oil & gas Petrobrazi Filling Brazi gas-fired Dorobanțu refinery stations power plant wind park KZ MD RO RS BG Company 2 Highligths 12 Statement of the Chief Executive Officer 14 OMV Petrom objectives and strategy 20 Sustainability / non-financial statement 26 OMV Petrom shares 29 Business environment Highligths Forty years of offshore excellence 3D seismic data was acquired for the Lebăda In 2016, OMV Petrom celebrated 40 years of East structure in 1983. A further batch of offshore activities in the Romanian part of the 3D seismic data acquisition was initiated in Black Sea and 30 years since first production 2005. Covering an area of 645 square km, the was achieved. Currently, the Black Sea is the additional data provided a new assessment second most important production area in of the near-field opportunities and led to the Romania, after the Oltenia region. discovery in 2007 of the Delta field. In addition to 3D seismic data acquisition, other new In 1976, the jack-up rig Gloria launched technologies were adopted, supporting real- drilling operations in the Black Sea, laying the time tracking of geological and geophysical foundations of Petromar (currently Asset X data. The newly implemented technologies were Petromar), a production area that delivered in crucial for drilling of the well Delta 6, the longest Petromar 2016 around 18% of the entire OMV Petrom of the field, with a horizontal movement of over supplies ~1/5 domestic production (~8% of the oil production 3,000 meters, down to a depth of 4,800 meters. of our domestic and ~26% of natural gas production). The annual Delta field was put into production in only two production oil and gas production coming from the Black years, the shortest time frame in Petromar’s Sea is sufficient to heat 1 mn households for a history. year or to fill 4.4 mn cars. The current infrastructure comprises: seven The implementation, for the first time in offshore platforms, hundreds of kilometers of Europe, of the three-phase tracers (compatible pipelines, 78 active wells, three helicopters and with water, oil and gas) in the stimulation of two support vessels operating 365 days/year. the wells from the Lebăda West field, can be considered a great achievement in Petromar‘s It all started with the exploration of the Western recent history. Tracers are environmentally section of the Romanian continental shelf, friendly chemicals that can be pumped in the based on 2D seismic data acquisition from well together with the stimulation liquid in order 1969 that identified 12 geological structures. to track its efficiency and to allocate water, oil Following the analyses, the first wildcat well and gas production to individual ports of the was drilled, Well 1 East Ovidiu. Although it did well. not lead to an economically viable discovery, it still remains the deepest Romanian offshore The implementation of the Lebăda Est Non- well (5,006 meters). After another dry-hole was Associated Gas Compression (LENAG) drilled in the Midia structure, the Gloria rig was project in Q2/16 represents another step in moved in 1979 to a location closer to the shore, the development of Asset X Petromar. With where it drilled a wildcat well that led to the first this project we aimed to optimize exploitation offshore commercial discovery, the Lebăda East by upgrading the existing gas compression field. Together with four other fields discovered system and ancillary facilities and delivering afterwards – Lebăda West (1984), Sinoe (1988), non-associated gas compression to minimize Pescăruș (1999) and Delta (2007) – Lebăda reservoir pressure decline. We completed the East is today part of the XVIII Istria block. In first stage of execution in November 2015 this block, OMV Petrom performs exploration, and finalized the remaining upgrades, which development and exploitation activities. included the upgrade of the non-associated gas Pescăruș – first In 2003, the Pescăruș field came on stream compression system, in Q2/16. unmanned and in 2008 Petromar had its first unmanned By carrying out this essential step, Asset X has production production platform, designed to be remotely reached an important milestone enabling it to platform operated from a control room on the central maximize production, reduce production decline platform. Pescăruș can be considered an and achieve more than 1,050 days without LTI example of best practice in terms of unmanned (Lost Time Injuries), the longest in Petromar’s production platforms. history. 2 Highligths OMV Petrom Annual Report 2016 | Company Following four decades of successful offshore The future of Petromar is shaped by the new activities, our business continuity faces several development and exploration projects that are threats, that are currently addressed under the currently in their early stages.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Effects of Establishing an FSRU Terminal at the Gulf of Saros in Turkey for Balkan Countries
    NOVEMBER 2019 B.’ Energy Notes BEN. 30 The Effects of Establishing an FSRU Terminal at the Gulf of Saros in Turkey for Balkan Countries Bihter Gülsoy [email protected] Selin Güngör [email protected] Berna Var [email protected] 1 Sude Yılmaz [email protected] THE EFFECTS OF ESTABLİSHİNG AN FSRU TERMİNAL AT THE GULF OF SAROS İN TURKEY FOR BALKAN COUNTRİES BİHTER GÜLSOY SELİN GÜNGÖR BERNA VAR AND SUDE YILMAZ B.’ Energy Notes BEN. 30 http://berument.bilkent.edu.tr/BEN Bilkent University Faculty of Economic, Administrative and Social Sciences Bilkent 06800, Ankara-Turkey NOVEMBER 2019 2 Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries are almost exclusively dependent on Russian natural gas for their consumption and most of them are seeking new alternatives to strengthen their energy security. New supply alternatives could be the solution to the dominance of the Russian gas. While the reason for the monopolistic status of Russia is providing the lowest prices to Europe, this benefit can be nullified by natural gas interruptions from Russia to these countries. The increasing number of new energy suppliers in the region may lead to an increase in the supply of natural gas, however, this may not eventually further decline in natural gas prices but may help to boost European natural gas supply security. Thus, new energy projects to provide alternatives such as the project in the Gulf of Saros in Turkey can provide an alternative to Russian gas for Balkan countries in the case of a need arises. The unique location Turkey has enables it to become not only a transit country but also with its developing new natural gas supply mechanisms.
    [Show full text]
  • Could Shale Gas Become a Reliable Energy Source for Europe and Romania?
    Could Shale Gas Become a Reliable Energy Source for Europe and Romania? MARIANA PAPATULICĂ Senior Researcher Institute of World Economy, Romanian Academy Calea 13 Septembrie, no. 13, District 5, Bucharest ROMANIA [email protected] PETRE PRISECARU PhD., Senior Researcher Institute of World Economy, Romanian Academy Calea 13 Septembrie, no. 13, District 5, Bucharest ROMANIA [email protected] Abstract: - While shale gas and oil is a success story in USA and Canada where production has considerably increased in the last five years the situation is quite different in Europe where exploration and production activities are quite low and prospects are not encouraging. Even in the Eastern Europe the first results of exploration are disappointing for the American companies, which have the technical expertise for exploring and extraction shale gas. Due to global warming there is now at the world scale a fierce confrontation between environmentalists and lobbyists of producing companies regarding the negative effects of hydraulic fracturing. Shale gas development in Europe depends more on the coal substitution by gas and on the use of CCS technologies. The collapse of crude oil prices may delay many projects in the field of shale gas and oil, especially in Europe. The prospects of oil gas in Romania are linked to the energy security concept, whose implementation requires diversification of energy supply on some levels. The development of shale gas in order to diversify the energy supply cannot compensate the groundwater pollution and other negative effects, like earthquake. The temporary withdrawal of Chevron from Romania will have some positive effects, allowing to our country a necessary time-out to better substantiate public policies in the field and to producing companies some time required for carrying out new technologies, less polluting and harmful.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy 2017 Fifth Edition
    Energy 2017 Fifth Edition Contributing Editors: Geoff rey Picton-Turbervill & Julia Derrick CONTENTS Preface Geoffrey Picton-Turbervill & Julia Derrick, Ashurst LLP General chapter Global Energy Security: New Concerns and Enduring Challenges – Karl V. Hopkins & Melissa Boyle Mahle, Dentons 1 Albania Floran Pustina & Jolita Hoxholli, TashkoPustina – Attorneys 9 Algeria Mohamed Chemloul & Amel Chemloul, Chemloul & Associés 23 Australia Graeme Gamble & Chelsea Herman, Herbert Smith Freehills 31 Belgium Wouter Geldhof, Cedric Degreef & Justine Diepart, Stibbe 39 Benin Jeffrey Gouhizoun & Elias Mahoulé Syné Guidi, OTL Conseils 52 Bolivia Enrique Barrios, Guevara & Gutiérrez S.C. 56 Congo – D.R. Pathy Liongo Bootsi & Michel Tshidibi Kankonde, Emery Mukendi Wafwana & Associates SCP 68 Cyprus Michael Damianos, Michael Damianos & Co LLC 73 Ecuador Daniel Pino Arroba, Jaime Arosemena Coronel & Fernanda Guzmán Amador, Coronel & Pérez 83 Germany Matthias Hirschmann & Alexander Koch, Hogan Lovells International LLP 86 Ghana David Addo-Ashong & Johnnie Klutse, Ashong Benjamin & Associates 96 Ivory Coast Gérard Bohui & Franck Hessemans, Hoegah & Etté Law Firm 108 Japan Takahiro Kobayashi & Shigeki Okatani, Mori Hamada & Matsumoto 112 Kenya John Miles, Nikhil Desai & Rubin Mukkam-Owuor, JMiles & Co. 123 Kosovo Erkand Kola, Rudi Metaj & Irina Kotenko, TashkoPustina – Attorneys 132 Mexico Juan Carlos Serra Campillo & Jorge Eduardo Escobedo Montaño, Basham, Ringe y Correa, S.C. 136 Morocco Kamal Habachi & Houda Habachi, Bakouchi & Habachi – HB Law Firm 147
    [Show full text]
  • The Burden of Belonging: Romanian and Bulgarian Foreign Policy in the New Era
    Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, Volume 11, Number 3, September 2009 The burden of belonging: Romanian and Bulgarian foreign policy in the new era RONALD H. LINDEN In the world there are only two tragedies. One is not getting what one wants, and the other is getting it. Oscar Wilde Introduction For all states, joining an international organization extracts a price. There are expectations, demands, conditions, more or less explicitly spelled out, that will apply to those wanting to become part of an ongoing international enterprise. This applies even to powerful countries and is one of the reasons why realist notions of foreign policy have typically included injunctions against alliance membership.1 For smaller countries in particular, such as the former communist countries of Central and East Europe, the path to achieving membership in international organizations has been especially challenging. The literature is vast and growing on EU expectations and conditions applied to the East European states since membership became a possibility in the mid-1990s.2 Virtually all of it focuses on these states’ adaptation of their domestic political and economic structures, changes in laws and processes including, for example, the adoption into domestic law of the 80,000-page acquis communautaire of the EU. The foreign policies of these states have been less frequently examined against the backdrop of their new membership in the international organizations Downloaded By: [Linden, Ronald H.] At: 12:24 17 September 2009 1 In his discussion of the ‘Nine Rules’ of diplomacy, Hans Morgenthau wrote, ‘Never allow a weak ally to make decisions for you.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Report of the WP2
    Project: BiG>East (EIE/07/214) Deliverable 2.2 Summary Report of the WP2 Augustin Ofiteru, Mihai Adamescu, Dan Ionescu SC Mangus Sol SRL, Romania With the support of: 1 Introduction This paper presents the results and conclusions of work tasks within WP2 of the BiG>East project in order to implement and develop biogas production in Bulgaria, Croatia, Greece, Latvia, Romania and Slovenia, the participant and also target countries of this project: ¾ Task 2.1. - Biogas installations in Romania ¾ Task 2.2. - Technical review of the utilisation of waste material for biogas production in Romania ¾ Task 2.3. - Estimation of the potential feedstock availability in Eastern Europe ¾ Task 2.4. - Assessment of the agricultural structure ¾ Task 2.5. - Biogas purification and assessment of the natural gas grid ¾ Task 2.7. - Impact of biogas production in Bulgaria, Croatia, Greece, Latvia, Romania and Slovenia All these results and conclusions provide an general overview about the actual state of technical-economical and material availabilities and opportunities for biogas production in the target countries of the BiG>East project, also considering the main ecological aspects. Furthermore, these studies support the key objective of BiG>East, providing the appropriate information for the biogas experts of Western Europe in order to transfer the knowledge from them to farmers, biogas plant operators and decision makers in Bulgaria, Croatia, Greece, Latvia, Romania, and Slovenia. 2 Renewable Energies in Romania With an electricity consumption of 58.49 TWh (2007), Romania has a net excedent of electricity production, based on a huge hydropower system counting for almost 40 % of the total produced energy.
    [Show full text]
  • BBSPA-Monthly-February-2018.Pdf
    15th of February 2018 15th of January 2018 – 15th of February 2018 BBSPA Monthly Bulletin Summary Oil and Gas Prices Spot Prices: Between 15 January 2018 and 15 February 2018 US WTI spot crude oil price fluctuated around $63/bbl; Henry Hub spot gas price decreased from $208/1000 cbm to $95/1000 (GCV at 0C). In Europe, at Central European Gas Hub, the average day ahead gas price was $247/1000 cbm (€18/Mwh, ECB average exchange rate). EU: Russian gas price exported to Europe was quoted to be $200/1000 cbm, while US LNG exports were $280/1000 cbm. Romania: The Agency for Mineral Resources of Romania (NAMR) recently launched a public debate about the methodology of calculating the reference price of natural gas. The royalty on gas production uses a formula, according to which the reference price will be based on the day-ahead prices at CEGH in Austria. The methodology was opposed by The Romanian Petroleum Exploration and Production Companies Association (ROPEPCA). According to the association the reference price should follow the prices in the centralized market in Romania, rather than in CEGH in Austria, where the prices are higher and fluctuate in big ranges. The methodology also should not be applied for long-term supply contracts. According to a report of the Court of Auditors, Romania has lost 7 billion RON because of delays in updating the methodology of calculating the reference gas price, NAMR objected the report, but the High Court for Cassation confirmed the views of the Court of Auditors. Currently the reference price in Romania is RON 495 per 1,000 cubic metres or 106 EUR/1000 cbm, while the day-ahead gas price at CEGH in Austria is 198 EUR/1000 cbm (11.2 Mwh for 1000 cbm).
    [Show full text]
  • Black Sea Oil & Gas Projects, the Total Amount of Financing for Each of the Projects Has Not Been Disclosed
    State Capture A case study about natural gas exploitation and transportation in Romania date October 2019 author Laura Nazare editors Ioana Ciută, Alexandru Mustață design and layout Lavinia Vereș print Azero contact bankwatch romania 98 Regina Maria Bd, bloc 119, ap. 10, 040125, Bucharest, Romania 031 438 24 89 [email protected] www.bankwatch.ro This briefing has been produced with the financial assistance of the Open Society Initiative. The contents of this briefing are the sole responsibility of Bankwatch Romania and can under no circumstances be regarded as reflecting the position of the Open Society Initiative. Contents Executive Summary 2 Introduction 6 Description of ongoing projects 10 • BRUA corridor 10 • Expansion of the national system for the transportation 12 of natural gas extracted from the Black Sea • Vadu Gas Terminal 14 • Tuzla Gas Terminal 17 Law amendments for gas exploitation and 18 gas transport projects • Law 185/2016 – BRUA Law 18 • Offshore Gas Law and royalties 20 Practices in applying the legal principles and provisions 22 regarding public consultation and participation in decision making • BRUA 22 • Vadu – T1 Pipeline 23 • Vadu Gas Treatment Plant 24 • Tuzla Gas Terminal 26 Conclusions 28 Recommendations 29 Black Sea Gas & Oil concession, source Radio Free Europe Romania 2 Executive Since its inclusion in the European Union’s Projects of Common Interest list in Octo- Summaryber 2013, the gas pipeline project connecting Bulgaria – Romania – Hungary – Austria (BRUA) is eligible for receiving public funding through the Connecting Europe Facil- ity1. In parallel, the Romanian Government and Parliament put forward once more the old idea of Romania being an important player in the European Gas Market .
    [Show full text]
  • Read the Book
    1 Acknowledgments We feel more than obliged to express our sincere gratitude towards all those who contributed for making this book a reality. We are grateful to all the authors who shared their deep knowledge and valuable inputs on the various markets related to the Southern Gas Corridor. Namely, we feel thankful to Mr. Plamen Dimitrov, Dr. Leo Drollas, Mr. Hans- Georg Heinrich, Mr. John Roberts, Dr. Nicolò Sartori, Dr. Simeone Tagliapietra, Dr. Theodoros Tsakiris and Mr. Mehmet Öğütçü. Finally, we are thankful to Mr. Konstantinos Ioannidis, Mr. Christos Zisakis and PhD candidate Mr. Filippos Ioannidis for their valuable assistance and collaboration towards the completion of this book. 2 Contents Contents .......................................................................................................... 3 List of Figures ................................................................................................. 7 List of Tables ................................................................................................ 11 Executive Summary ...................................................................................... 12 1 An overview of the SE European Gas Markets and LNG Prospects ... 16 1.1 Introduction to Natural Gas ......................................................... 16 1.2 LNG Markets and Global Trends ................................................ 19 1.3 European Gas and LNG Markets ................................................ 23 2 The Role of Natural Gas in the EU Decarbonisation Path ..................
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview on Royalties and Similar Taxes Oil and Gas Upstream Sector Across Europe April 2017 Contents
    An overview on royalties and similar taxes Oil and gas upstream sector across Europe April 2017 Contents Background and methodology Executive summary General overview of Romania and other European countries Graphical view of oil & gas royalties and similar taxes Fiscal regime changes Limitations and acknowledgements References and resources 2 Background and methodology We were requested by Asociația Română a Companiilor de Explorare și Producție Petrolieră (“ROPEPCA”) to conduct an analysis with respect to the level of royalties and similar taxes applicable for the oil & gas upstream sector in Europe, as at 31 December 2015. For the purpose of establishing a comprehensive and comparative overview of the fiscal environment and the related market conditions in relation to the oil and gas industry, this analysis has taken into account the position of the European countries. Furthermore, most European countries have a specific tax regime for oil & gas industry which includes royalties or other specific taxes, as well as increased corporate income tax rates for operators activating in this sector. The report should be considered within the limitation that every country has a different tax regime. The effective royalties and similar specific taxes may differ from nominal rates. These are driven by national priorities, market reality and the recent severe decline of oil and gas prices which affected the latest years. We have performed an analysis regarding the effective tax rates in different European countries based on the information available as at 31 December 2015, except where explained otherwise. The computation of the effective tax rate for each country had in view the value of the royalties and specific taxes paid by the main players divided by the revenues obtained from the production and sale of oil & gas, for which public information was available.
    [Show full text]
  • The Outlook for Natural Gas in Romania and Proposals for Its Value-Added Capitalization
    REPORT The Outlook for natural gas in Romania and proposals for its value-added capitalization Vasile Iuga and Radu Dudău June 2018 Table of contents Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................................................................ 3 Executive summary ............................................................................................................................................................. 4 1. A Brief history of the natural gas industry in Romania ..........................................................9 2. The current state of the Romanian natural gas sector ............................................................11 2.1 Natural gas resources and reserves ........................................................................................................11 2.2 Production, imports and underground storage .........................................................................12 2.3 The National Gas Transmission System (NTS) ............................................................................ 13 2.4 Natural gas transmission corridors and Romania‘s interconnection to regional networks ......................................................................15 2.5 Interconnection and security of gas supply ..................................................................................18 2.6 Natural gas underground storage .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Analysis of the Chosen Internal Condition and Prospects of Romania's Energy Security
    Land Forces Academy Review Vol. XXII, No 1(85), 2017 THE ANALYSIS OF THE CHOSEN INTERNAL CONDITION AND PROSPECTS OF ROMANIA’S ENERGY SECURITY Michał RUTKA Jagiellonian University in Cracow, Poland [email protected] ABSTRACT In the age of high pace of technological, economic and social development, stable and uninterrupted energy supply is one of the key components determining the economic sovereignty of the state, its position in international relations, and the quality of human life. Every economy around the world is heavily dependent on its energy sector. Consequently, ensuring energy security is currently one of the most important determinant of every country’s national security and the purpose of its security policy. In this article we focus on Romania's energy security internal condition and prospects. Our main goal is to present actual state and prospects of Romanian energy sector. In order to achieve that goal, we decided to use various methods, such as descriptive analysis, document analysis and comparative analysis. The article has two parts. The first part consists of a description of energy sources and infrastructure used by Romanian economy. The second part is an analysis of possible chances and threats for both energy sector and energy security level. KEYWORDS: energy, energy security, prospects, resources, Romania 1. Introduction This situation prompted us to undertake Romania, a country located at the an analysis of the chosen internal conditions crossing point between east-west and north- of the Romanian energy security, as well as south energy transit routes, is in relatively the analysis of its possible prospects for the privileged position compared to other future.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    Document of The World Bank FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Public Disclosure Authorized Report No. 3745a-RO STAFF APPRAISAL REPORT Public Disclosure Authorized ROMANIA VIDELE/BALARIA ENHANCED OIL RECOVERY PROJECT Public Disclosure Authorized April 30, 1982 Energy Department Public Disclosure Authorized Petroleum Projects Division I This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the performance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise bh disclosed without World Bank authorization. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS Currency Unit = Leu, Lei (Plural) Lei 15 = US$1.00 from January 1, 1981 WEIGHTS AND MEASURES 1 Meter (m) = 3.2808 feet (ft) 1 Kilometer (km) = 0.6214 miles (mi) 1 Kilogram (kg) = 1,000 grams = 10milli- grams (mg) 1 Kilogram (kg) = 2.205 pounds (lbs) 1 Metric ton (ton) = 2,205 pounds 1 Cubic meter (m3 or cu m) = 35.31 cubic feet 1 Barrel of oil (Bbl) = 0.159 cu m 1 Metric ton of oil, 350 API = 7.4 Bbls 1 British thermal unit (Btu) = 0.252 Kilocalories (Kcal) 1 Kilowatt hour (kWh) = 2.978 (Kcal) 1 Megawatt (MW) = 1,000 Kilowatt (kW) ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS AOSTRA - Alberta Oil Sands Technology and Research Authority °API - American Petroleum Institute degrees (API gravity) CIF - Cost, Insurance and Freight EOR - Enhanced Oil Recovery FOB - Free on Board GNP - Gross National Product GOR - Gas Oil Ratio IB - Investment Bank ICB - International Competitive Bidding ICPPG - Institute of Research and Industrial Design for Oil and Gas Production IDC - Interest During Construction IFP - Institut Francais du Petrole MP - Ministerul Petrolului (Ministry of Petroleum) OIIP - Oil Initially in Place Toe - Tons of oil equivalent TPB - Trustul Petrolului Bolintin (Bolintin Petroleum Trust) tpy - tons per year ROMCONSULT - Romanian enterprise for international consulting ROMPETROL - Romanian enterprise for international cooperation in the oil and gas industry FISCAL YEAR January 1 to December 31 FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY ROMANIA VIDELE/BALARIA ENHANCEDOIL RECOVERYPROJECT STAFF APPRAISAL REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No.
    [Show full text]