DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental Assessment Bonneville Shoreline Trail – Salt Lake County Response to Comments

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Environmental Assessment Bonneville Shoreline Trail – Salt Lake County Response to Comments Chapter 2 – Alternatives Environmental United States Department Assessment of Agriculture Bonneville Shoreline Trail – Salt Lake County U.S. Forest Service March 2010 Response to Comments Salt Lake County, Utah Salt Lake Ranger District, Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest For Information Contact: Steve Scheid 6944 South 3000 East Cottonwood Heights, UT 84121 [email protected] (801) 733-2689 Bonneville Shoreline Trail Environmental Assessment Environmental Assessment Bonneville Shoreline Trail – Salt Lake County Response to Comments Table of Contents 1. Purpose and Need ...................................................................................................................................... 2 2. Alternatives ................................................................................................................................................. 3 3. General Ecological Resources ..................................................................................................................... 8 4. Soils ........................................................................................................................................................... 10 5. Water Resources....................................................................................................................................... 17 6. Process (Comments Referring to Scoping or NEPA Process) .................................................................... 19 7. Recreation................................................................................................................................................. 25 8. Economic .................................................................................................................................................. 31 9. Social ......................................................................................................................................................... 33 10. Transportation ...................................................................................................................................... 40 11. Vegetation ............................................................................................................................................ 49 12. Visual Resources ................................................................................................................................... 51 13. Wildlife (Not Including Listed or Sensitive Species) and Wildlife Habitat ............................................ 57 14. Wilderness ............................................................................................................................................ 62 15. Private Property .................................................................................................................................... 65 16. Fire ........................................................................................................................................................ 74 Content Analysis Process Public responses on the Preliminary Environmental Assessment (EA) for the Bonneville Shoreline Trail (BST) project were documented and analyzed using a process called content analysis. This is a systematic process of compiling, categorizing and summarizing all comments submitted on a project. This method is useful in analyzing voluminous comments both individually and collectively. Many of the comments were similar in nature and those were grouped and responded to as such, while other specific comments were responded to individually. All comments were assigned a code number and the comments, whether grouped or individual, retain their code numbers for tracking purposes. Interested parties may review the reading file of original response letters on file at the Salt Lake District Office in Salt Lake City, UT. Response to Comments 1 Bonneville Shoreline Trail Environmental Assessment 1. Purpose and Need 1. Comment H17: It honestly seems to me that government entities, particularly their leaders, get a notion to do something, obtain funding for the project, then railroad it through because they exist to do this kind of thing. Certainly, there is little democratic representation in all of this. 1. Response: The USFS has involved the public in the decision-making process. The USFS has worked closely with the BST Committee as well as with Salt Lake County and other local government agencies in BST land acquisitions, planning, and trail construction. The proposal was provided to the public and other agencies for comment during scoping March17 to April 17, 2006. A public scoping meeting was conducted on April 5, 2006 to gather comments from the public and interested agencies and organizations on the proposed alignment, construction, and use of the extended BST. Sixty-six people registered at the meeting. Over 350 people have provided comments on the project during the scoping period. 2. Comment H1, H4: Why do we need more biking and hiking trails around here when we have all of Mill Creek Canyon with its many biking and hiking trails, and Wasatch Blvd bike lanes, going north and south, and the new Parley’s Canyon trail just below I-215. I question that there is a need for any trail other than Wasatch Boulevard. Connections to the Neff’s Canyon Trail could be up Oakview Drive then east over to Park Terrace Drive and up Whites Way to the trailhead. 2. Response to Comments H1 and H4: Section 1.2 of the EA provides the purpose and need for the proposed trail. The Forest Plan details a strong commitment by the USFS to complete the BST. In addition, local government has recognized the importance and value of the BST as a community asset. The BST would be recognized and valued as a unique opportunity to provide recreation corridors across multiple ownerships in the face of continuing urban development. The proposed trail is needed to provide unique quality recreation opportunities along the urban-forest interface. In addition to recreational purposes, the trail may serve as a fire buffer and access for fire suppression to protect property in the wildland urban interface. The use of Wasatch Blvd. is reflected and analyzed under the No Action Alternative. Recreational impacts of selecting the No-Action Alternative are outlined in Section 3.3.3. The increased demand for recreation would not be met, user conflicts and conflicts with adjacent property owners would likely continue. Visitor use is expected to increase on built trails, existing user-created trails, as well as proliferation of user-created trails. 3. Comments H37, F4: Building the Bonneville Shoreline Trail above the Eastwood and Olympus Cove residential areas is unnecessary. There are already numerous hiking and biking trails close by in Millcreek Canyon. Street bikers can use Wasatch Blvd. The bridges across Parley’s Canyon are good projects because there is no other way to transverse the canyon above 20th East, but there is no real need for this trail. At this point in time, the expense of putting a trail in where none is necessary seems a foolish use of tax payer money. If someone wants to traverse the mountain side...they may certainly do it now. As well, this area has no lack of trails...many of which are seldom used. If you want to take a hike in this area and not see anyone else on the trail....try the west side of Grandeur Peak from Wasatch. Even the easy accessed Pipe Line trail is lightly used. The expense you are anticipating seems to be incredibly shortsighted. Response to Comments 2 Bonneville Shoreline Trail Environmental Assessment 3. Response to H37 and F4: The need for the proposed action is described in Section 1.2 of the EA. The Wasatch-Cache National Forest Plan describes why the USFS is considering this project: ―The BST, designated in 1999 as one of sixteen national Millennium Legacy Trails, is envisioned to be an aesthetically pleasing (though urban influenced), non-motorized recreational trail experience, nearby yet apart from the urban Wasatch Front and its many communities. The Bonneville Shoreline is a very important regional trail yet critical portions remain incomplete. The trail serves a variety of users and provides both recreational and economic benefits to local communities. Access to the national forest continues to be threatened as development near the forest continues. In the future the BST will be recognized and valued as a unique opportunity to provide recreation corridors across multiple ownerships in the face of continuing urban development. In addition to recreational purposes, the trail may serve as a fire buffer, a recognizable, defensible physical boundary for the Forest, and access for fire suppression to protect property in the wildland urban interface.‖ As for the funding and maintenance of the trail, any trail would be constructed and maintained with a substantial volunteer contribution and would be funded through a combination of public and private funds. 4. Comment M5, M23, M47, M49: On a more practical note the disruption to the neighborhoods during the construction and the lasting impact to the security and privacy to this residential community seem unreasonable when easier and more convenient alternative routes are available. When decisions concerning bridge safety, health, education, and similar social needs are being deferred, it would seem that spending public funds on an un-needed hiking trail through a residential community would be less than essential. Specific areas mentioned: south end of Mile
Load more

Recommended publications
  • UMNP Mountains Manual 2017
    Mountain Adventures Manual utahmasternaturalist.org June 2017 UMN/Manual/2017-03pr Welcome to Utah Master Naturalist! Utah Master Naturalist was developed to help you initiate or continue your own personal journey to increase your understanding of, and appreciation for, Utah’s amazing natural world. We will explore and learn aBout the major ecosystems of Utah, the plant and animal communities that depend upon those systems, and our role in shaping our past, in determining our future, and as stewards of the land. Utah Master Naturalist is a certification program developed By Utah State University Extension with the partnership of more than 25 other organizations in Utah. The mission of Utah Master Naturalist is to develop well-informed volunteers and professionals who provide education, outreach, and service promoting stewardship of natural resources within their communities. Our goal, then, is to assist you in assisting others to develop a greater appreciation and respect for Utah’s Beautiful natural world. “When we see the land as a community to which we belong, we may begin to use it with love and respect.” - Aldo Leopold Participating in a Utah Master Naturalist course provides each of us opportunities to learn not only from the instructors and guest speaKers, But also from each other. We each arrive at a Utah Master Naturalist course with our own rich collection of knowledge and experiences, and we have a unique opportunity to share that Knowledge with each other. This helps us learn and grow not just as individuals, but together as a group with the understanding that there is always more to learn, and more to share.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Utah State Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2014 Utah
    2014 Utah State Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan UTAH STATE PARKS Division of Utah State Parks and Recreation Planning Section 1594 West North Temple, Ste. 116 P.O. Box 146001 Salt Lake City, UT 84116-6001 (877) UT-PARKS stateparks.utah.gov State of Utah Figure 1. Public land ownership in Utah. ii 2014 SCORP ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The research and publication of the 2014 Utah State Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan (SCORP) is a product of a team effort. The Utah Department of Natural Resources, Division of Utah State Parks and Recreation, Utah Division of Wildlife Resources, Utah Department of Transportation, Utah Division of Water Resources, Governor’s Office of Planning and Budget, National Park Service (Omaha Regional Office), U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation, Utah League of Cities and Towns, Utah Association of Counties, Utah Recreation and Parks Association, and others provided data, information, advice, recommendations, and encouragement. The 2014 Utah SCORP was completed under contract by BIO-WEST, Inc. (BIO-WEST), with survey work completed by Dan Jones & Associates. Key project contributors include Gary Armstrong, project manager for BIO-WEST, and David Howard, lead survey research associate for Dan Jones & Associates. Susan Zarekarizi of the Division of Utah State Parks and Recreation served as the overall project manager and provided contractor oversight. Additional staff contributing to the project include Sean Keenan of BIO-WEST, and Tyson Chapman and Kjersten Adams of Dan Jones & Associates. The 2014 Utah SCORP represents demand for future recreation facilities as identified in a series of public opinion surveys, special reports, park surveys, federal and local plans, technical reports, and other data.
    [Show full text]
  • Antelope Island State Park International Dark Sky Park Designation Application Packet
    1 Antelope Island State Park International Dark Sky Park Designation Application Packet January 2017 Antelope Island State Park Night Sky Looking South by Dan Ransom Wendy A Wilson, Assistant Park Manager Antelope Island State Park 2 Table of Contents International Dark Sky Park Summary 3 Nomination Letter from Janet Muir, North Fork Park 5 Park Map 6 Park Resources 8 Ecology 8 Geological Resources 9 Human History 9 Natural Darkness Resources 10 Climate 13 Light Pollution 16 Night Sky Resources 18 Public Leadership Project 20 Visitor Experiences (Interpretive Programs and Outreach) 22 Exterior Light Management Plan 26 Exterior Lighting Inventory 32 Letters of Support Fred Hayes - Director, Division of Parks and Recreation 41 Jeremy Shaw - Manager, Antelope Island State Park 42 Steven Bates - Wildlife Biologist, Antelope Island State Park 43 Justina Parsons-Bernstein - Heritage , Interpretive and ADA Resources Manager 44 Davis County Commission 45 Syracuse City, Resolution 46 Ogden Astronomical Society 48 Friends of Antelope Island 49 Antelope Island State Park 3 Antelope Island State Park International Dark Sky Park Summary Antelope Island State Park seeks designation as an IDA Dark Sky Park and aims to show within this document that the land base, while flanked on the east side by the heavily populated Wasatch Front, meets the criteria for designation as a dark sky resource. Antelope Island State Park’s visitation in 2015 was over 320,000. The opportunity for public nighttime access is available on a regular basis, with entrance gates staying open until 10:00 pm during spring, summer and fall months, and until 7:00 pm during winter months.
    [Show full text]
  • National Forest Imagery Catalog Collection at the USDA
    National Forest Imagery Catalog collection at the USDA - Farm Service Agency Aerial Photography Field Office (APFO) 2222 West 2300 South Salt Lake City, UT 84119-2020 (801) 844-2922 - Customer Service Section (801) 956-3653 - Fax (801) 956-3654 - TDD [email protected] http://www.apfo.usda.gov This catalog listing shows the various photographic coverages used by the U.S. Department of Agriculture and archived at the Aerial Photography Field Office. This catalog references U.S. Forest Service (FS) and other agencies imagery. For imagery prior to 1955, please contact the National Archives & Records Administration: Cartographic & Architectural Reference (NWCS-Cartographic) Aerial Photographs Team http://www.archives.gov/research/order/maps.html#contact Coverage of U.S. Forest Service photography is listed alphabetically for each forest within a region. Numeric and alpha codes used to identify FS projects are determined by the Forest Service. The original film type for most of this imagery is a natural color negative. Line indexes are available for most projects. The number of index sheets required to cover a project area is shown on the listing. Please reference the remarks column, which may identify a larger or smaller project area than the National Forest area defined in the header. Offered in the catalog listing at each National Forest heading is a link to locate the Regional and National Forest office address and phone number at: http://www.fs.fed.us/intro/directory You may wish to visit the National Forest office to view the current imagery and have them assist you in identifying aerial imagery from the APFO.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Explorer Corps Passport
    PASSPORT to Utah’s Natural History A Special Thanks Sponsors Supporting Partners YOUR PASSPORT TO ADVENTURE IS HERE! Join us in celebrating Utah’s remarkable natural history by visiting uniquely-Utah locations throughout the state. With a marker placed in every county, and a quest to find them all, that’s 29 unforgettable destinations to check out! How many can you find, and what will you discover? Follow and share #explorercorps or visit nhmu.utah.edu/explorer-corps 1 JOIN EXPLORER CORPS Bring this passport with you as you discover all Utah has to offer! Each page is dedicated to one of Utah’s 29 counties. You’ll find directions to the marker (and GPS coordinates if that’s your thing), fast facts about the area celebrated in that county, plus great suggestions for going further and digging deeper. Use the Travel Log inside the back cover to track your progress and the Field Journal in the back of this passport to capture notes from the markers you visit. A couple of tips: n Download our Explorer Corps app for iPhone and Android and use augmented reality to bring Utah’s natural history to life. n Visit local libraries for books and additional resources. n Enter our Race to 29! and Explorer Corps Weekly Giveaways for your chance to win great prizes, receive Explorer Corps badges, and more. Visit nhmu.utah.edu/explorer-corps for full details. The adventure is yours—good luck! 2 WE HONOR NATIVE LAND Places have a complex and layered history. That is true for the locations and specimens highlighted in this passport.
    [Show full text]
  • South Island Trail - Antelope Island
    SOUTH ISLAND TRAIL - ANTELOPE ISLAND Rating: Moderate Hike Length: 3-4 hours (8 miles / 11.2 miles in the winter) Gear: Standard Hiking Gear Water: None. Season: Late fall, winter, early spring Waypoints: Winter Trailhead 12T 401547mE 4531329mN N40° 55' 38" W112° 10' 10" Trailhead 12T 401236mE 4528926mN N40° 54' 20" W112° 10' 22" Jct - Left 12T 401119mE 4524245mN N40° 51' 48" W112° 10' 24" Hype The South Island Trail seems less popular than the trails on the west side of the island, or the Frary Peak Trail, but is one of my favorites. Visiting the trail at sunrise on a cold winter day can be magic! The trail follows a dirt road as it ambles south on the east side of the island to Unicorn Point at the very southern tip of Antelope Island. Compared to the other trails I have visited on the island; this one also had the most wildlife. Maybe it was the day, or maybe the animals prefer the quiet east side. I counted 7 coyotes and dozens of buffalo on a cold winter morning along the trail. Note: The trail is 8 miles round trip, except when it isn’t! In winter, the road is closed at Fielding Garr Ranch, adding 3.2 miles and bumping up the round-trip distance to 11.2 miles. Season: I recommend this trail in late fall, winter, or early spring. Bugs and heat can be oppressive during the warmer times of the year. Tags: hike, dog friendly, family friendly, beginner, access: paved Trailhead The trailhead is reach by first getting to Antelope Island.
    [Show full text]
  • Explore Utah.Pdf
    UTAH OFFICE OF TOURISM Council Hall/Capitol Hill 300 North State Street Patti Denny Salt Lake City, UT 841114 Manager Travel Trade Program Tel. 801 538 1318 Email: [email protected] Fax. 801 438 1399 www.visitutah.com UTAH Home to five national parks, 43 state parks, national monuments, national recreation areas and ‘The Greatest Snow on Earth®’, Utah represents the best of both the Rocky Mountains and the Desert Southwest. Whether it’s heart- thumping downhill skiing, gravity-defying rock climbing, thrilling white-water rafting or just TouRISM ATTRACTIONS communing with nature, Utah has it all – holding American West Heritage Center true to the state’s ‘Life Elevated’ brand. Antelope Island State Park Arches National Park New for Salt Lake City in 2012 is the City Creek Bear Lake State Park Center, a luxury mall across from one of Utah’s Bear River Migratory Bird Refuge most popular attractions, Temple Square. The Bryce Canyon National Park new City Creek Center can be accessed by a Canyonlands National Park 10-minute light-rail ride from the Salt Lake City Cedar Breaks National Monument International Airport. Also new to Salt Lake this Dead Horse Point State Park year is the Natural History Museum of Utah which Goblin Valley State Park will showcase previously-unseen artefacts from Logan Canyon Scenic Byway Utah’s history and prehistory. Salt Lake City San Rafael Swell In 2012, Utah’s 14 ski resorts are rolling out the Zion National Park white carpet to celebrate the 10-year anniversary Services offered by the Utah Office of the 2002 Salt Lake Winter Olympics.
    [Show full text]
  • Utah Lake Watch Report 2005
    Utah Lake Watch Report 2005 Prepared for Utah Division of Water Quality By Andy Dean, Utah State University Water Quality Extension www.extension.usu.edu/waterquality (435)797-2580 December 12, 2005 For additional copies of this report contact: Nancy Mesner (435)797-2465 [email protected] Introduction The Utah Lake Watch (ULW) program recruits volunteers to take Secchi depth measurements in lakes and reservoirs throughout Utah. This ULW annual report summarizes the results of Secchi depth measurements taken by volunteers throughout the summer of 2005. The data collected through the ULW are submitted to the Utah Division of Water Quality to supplement the data they take through their lakes program. The data can be used by scientists, lake managers, and numerous other organizations to analyze the clarity of and overall health of the lakes. Volunteers are trained individually to use a Secchi disk. The Secchi disk is lowered into the water body and the depth at which it disappears is the Secchi depth. Volunteers are also given information about site location (the DEQ station description or GPS coordinates). The monitoring site is typically the deepest part of the lake or nearest the dam on a reservoir. Standardized data sheets are given to each volunteer, which are returned to the USU Water Quality Extension office (Appendix 1) at the end of the summer season so these data can be recorded and summarized. Results During 2005, Secchi depths were recorded by 16 volunteers on 20 different lakes and reservoirs throughout Utah (23 sites total due to multiple sites in several reservoirs).
    [Show full text]
  • Junior Ranger Booklet
    Antelope Island State Park Junior Ranger Activity Guide So You Want to Be a Junior Ranger? To become an Antelope Island State Park Junior Ranger, complete the following steps. Step One: □ Attend a ranger program. Name of program I attended: _________________________________ One thing I learned: _________________________________________ Ranger Signature: ___________________________________________ OR □ Watch the Visitor Center video. One thing I learned from the video: ____________________________ _____________________________________________________________ Step Two: □ For ages 4–6, complete at least 3 activities. □ For ages 7–9, complete at least 5 activities. □ For ages 10 and up, complete at least 8 activities. Step Three: □ Return your booklet to the Visitor Center or Ranch for review and recite the Junior Ranger Pledge. DID YOU KNOW? Pronghorn can sprint at 70 miles per hour, making them the second fastest land animal! Naming an Island Ever wonder why we call this place Antelope Island? It was named by a famous explorer in 1845. Use the words at the bottom to fill in the blanks and learn how Antelope Island got its name. John C. Fremont was a great _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. When he came to Great Salt Lake, the Native Americans told him he could ride his _ _ _ _ _ out into the lake and reach a great island. Fremont and his guide Kit _ _ _ _ _ _ rode across the shallows to the island. On the island, they saw lots of _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _, which they believed were antelope. (Pronghorn are not really antelope at all! They are more closely related to an ancient _ _ _ _ -like animal.) Fremont’s men drank from the freshwater springs.
    [Show full text]
  • Utah Land Use Plan Amendment for Fire and Fuels Management UT
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT Utah Land Use Plan Amendment for Fire and Fuels Management UT-USO-04-01 September 2005 September 2005 - FONSI/DR September 2005 - FONSI/DR FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT AND DECISION RECORD UT-USO-04-01 Utah Land Use Plan Amendment for Fire and Fuels Management Based on the analysis of potential environmental impacts in the attached environmental assessment (EA UT-USO-04-01) and consideration of the significance criteria in 40 CFR 1508.27, I have determined that the Utah Land Use Plan Amendment for Fire and Fuels Management would not result in significant impacts on the human environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is therefore not required. Decision: It is my decision to amend fire and fuels management direction contained in 17 Bureau of Land Management (BLM) land use plans (LUPS) in Utah as described in the Proposed Action alternative of the Utah Land Use Plan Amendment for Fire and Fuels Management Environmental Assessment (UT-USO-04-01). The following land use plans are amended by this action: Land Use Plan Year Completed Salt Lake Field Office Iso-Tract Management Framework Plan (MFP) 1985 Park City MFP 1975 Randolph MFP 1980 Richfield Field Office Forest MFP 1977 Henry Mountain MFP 1982 Mountain Valley MFP 1982 Parker Mountain MFP 1982 Moab Field Office Grand Resource Management Plan (RMP) 1985 Monticello Field Office San Juan RMP 1991 Kanab Field Office Escalante MFP 1981 Paria MFP 1981 Vermilion MFP 1981 Zion MFP 1981 Cedar City Field Office Cedar Beaver Garfield Antimony RMP 1986 Pinyon MFP 1983 St.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Utah Interagency Fire Center
    NORTHERN UTAH INTERAGENCY FIRE CENTER INITIAL ATTACK RUN CARDS 2020 Version: March 23, 2020 Northern Utah Interagency Run Cards, 2020 Effective June 1 through October 1. Notifications will occur at any time of year. The Interagency Run Cards are developed by a group of interagency representatives to provide guidance to the Northern Utah Interagency Fire Center (NUIFC) for initial attack dispatching of wildland fire suppression resources within a pre-identified geographic areas (run card zones). The run cards are used when there is a new smoke reported and doesn’t meet the discretionary smoke report criteria. When a NWCG qualified Incident Commander is on scene of the fire, they may adjust the pre- established initial attack response as identified on the run card by cancelling resources currently en-route (or about to be dispatched) or ordering additional resources. Discretionary Smoke Reports: If any of the following smoke reports are received, the appropriate Duty Officer will need to be contacted to determine the response. During periods of large/multiple fire activity, when there are not enough resources to fill the run cards, the Duty Officers from FF&SL, USFS and BLM will be available to NUIFC to assist in initial attack incident prioritization. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Report Abandoned Campfires, when clearly stated that it is still within the ring Duty Officers may only make an adjustment to the Run Card after gathering Situational Awareness/Intelligence from current responding resources. This should be a rare augmentation to the pre-established Run Card response. After Hours Dispatch Procedures: BLM: After resource duty hours, dispatchers will contact the BLM Duty Officer who will determine the level of response for BLM fires.
    [Show full text]
  • Utah Scenic Byways Guide
    Utah is the place where prehistory intersects with the enduring spirit of the Old West. Wild, adventure-rich places cradle vibrant urban centers. With interstates and airplanes, the world can feel pretty small. On Utah’s designated scenic byways, the world feels grand; its horizons seem infinite. As you drive through Utah, you’ll inevitably encounter many of the state’s scenic byways. In total, Utah’s distinct topography provides the surface for 27 scenic byways, which add up to hundreds of miles of vivid travel experiences wherein the road trip is as memorable as the destination. Utah’s All-American Road: Scenic Byway 12 headlines the network of top roads thanks to landscapes and heritage unlike anywhere else in the nation. All of Utah’s scenic byways are explorative journeys filled with trailheads, scenic overlooks, museums, local flavors and vibrant communities where you can stop for the night or hook up your RV. Not sure where to start? In the following pages, you’ll discover monumental upheavals of exposed rock strata among multiple national and state parks along the All-American Road (pg. 4); dense concentrations of fossils along Dinosaur Diamond (pg. 8); and the blazing red cliffs and deep blue waters of Flaming Gorge–Uintas (pg. 12) — and that’s just in the first three highlighted byways. Your journey continues down two dozen additional byways, arranged north to south. Best of all, these byways access an outdoor adventureland you can hike, fish, bike, raft, climb and explore from sunup to sundown — then stay up to welcome the return of the Milky Way.
    [Show full text]