Urgent Calls to Fix 'Incoherent' Health and Social Care

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

The lHeaolth newsw and analysids to inforom and emwpower NHSn staff and campaigners Urgent calls to fix ‘incoherent’ health and social care staffing A build-up in staff shortages in both the NHS and so - wellbeing lead, told the Health and Social Care select cial care due to mistakes made over the previous committee: “Health and care staff suffered stress and decade by the Conservative government has now led work-related anxiety before the pandemic but it is now to such high levels of burn-out rates and staff continued on page 2... turnover that the services are in danger of not work - ing properly, a cross-party committee of MPs has been told. Also in this issue... The burn-out resulting from chronic workplace stress Mega lab: news blackout at Leamington Spa site? p3 results in some to take time off sick, others to reduce Data grab: GP patient records plan meets resistance p4-5 their working hours, resign or take early retirement, which Bed capacity: hospitals struggle as demand rises p6-7 in turn makes the situation worse for those left. Health visitors: jobs under threat in Staffordshire p11 Dr David Wrigley, the British Medical Association’s Going private: NHS trust takes over Circle Health site p12 https://lowdownnhs.info [email protected] number 47 – 15/06/2021 2/ ...continued from page 1 “Filling registered nurse vacancies with those who are far more serious and we believe the current level of staff not registered nurses is not filling those vacancies,” said burnout and stress presents a worrying risk to the future RCN Acting General Secretary & Chief Executive Pat functioning of the health and care system and safe pa - Cullen. “Acting in this way not only leads to vacancies tient care.” elsewhere but also carries a risk to patient care.” Burn-out is a widespread reality in today’s NHS, noted Although using a deeply flawed approach, long-term the committee; burn-out damages the health of staff, and workforce planning has at least been attempted in the affects care safety and quality. It is linked with high NHS, the latest being the June 2019, the Interim NHS turnover and intention to quit, along with higher levels of People Plan, in social care there has been no such ap - patient mortality in the acute sector. proach. A major driver of burn-out is “chronic excessive work - The social care workforce is “if anything even more load” and the key to tackling it is having the right number fragile than the NHS” the King’s Fund told the Commit - of people, with the right mix of skills across both the NHS tee. The staff turnover rate was estimated to be 30.8% and care system – good workforce planning. by the organisation Skills for Care in 2018/19. Skills for Care estimates that if the adult social care workforce Set to get worse grows at the same rate as the projected number of peo - The committee was told that there were an estimated ple aged 65 and over in the population, then the number 85,000 vacancies in the NHS in England and 112,000 un - of adult social care jobs will increase by 32% (or by filled posts in social care before the pandemic struck. All 520,000 jobs), to around 2.17 million jobs by 2035. predictions show that this is set to get worse: What is now urgently needed, the committee con - The Health Foundation has predicted that the NHS in cluded, is a comprehensive 10-year plan for social care, England is likely to require workforce growth of 3.2% a however the committee noted that it had called for such year over the next 15 years, which “implies a requirement a plan from the government previously, as has the Care of a projected 179,000 additional FTE staff by 2023–24, Quality Commission (CQC), and those in the private and rising to 639,000 additional FTE staff by 2033/34”. voluntary sector of social care, all to no avail. The health thinktank The King’s Fund told the commit - tee the current approach to workforce planning, was “in - Lack of funding coherent” and that funding for education and training was In his oral evidence to the committee Professor Martin “inadequate” with a “reliance on overseas recruitment”. Green of Care England, called for a 10- year plan for so - In written evidence the King’s Fund noted that since cial care that was “aligned on every level” with the NHS the 2012 Health and Social Care Act responsibilities for People Plan and included workforce issues, skills mix, workforce planning had been fragmented and there has support for staff and how to ensure that “we retain as well been “a lack of clarity” at a national level. as recruit the right people”. More recently a number of policy decisions (on, for ex - For both the NHS People Plan and, if forthcoming a ample, immigration, English language testing and student plan for social care, it was made very clear to the com - bursaries) made “improvement harder rather than eas - mittee, that however ambitious the plans to address ier.” workforce issues are, nothing will come of them unless The Government has for many years based workforce they are funded sufficiently. planning on the funds available rather than on the de - The most recent NHS People Plan was widely criti - mand and the capacity needed to cope with that demand. cised for the lack of detail and the lack of funding at - This has been a fundamental error that has led to the tached to the plan. The King’s Fund described the high number of vacancies. People Plan as “another stop-gap that falls a long way The Royal College of Nursing is warning that NHS short of the workforce strategy needed”, and the NHS trusts are now recruiting people without the right qualifi - Confederation said that “too many investment decisions cations to act as registered nurses, despite the risk to pa - have been postponed or clarity has not been forthcom - tients; another outcome of poor workforce planning over ing, especially with the longstanding need to address va - the past decade that has left the country with a shortage cancies”. of nurses. Sylvia Davidson https://lowdownnhs.info [email protected] /3 No answers on delayed Leamington Spa ‘mega lab’ A total, constipated silence from the NHS and ministers Since then the opening has been postponed to “spring” – or shrouds the long-delayed new “mega lab” that was sup - questions of when it might open simply ignored. Dozens of local posed to have opened in Leamington Spa last January as residents who have signed contracts to begin working at the part of the £37 billion ‘test and trace’ system. laboratory have been complaining to Matt Western that they The Department for Health and Social Care has stonewalled – have heard nothing from recruiters – and been left in limbo, without or given misleading answers to questions from local journalists, pay. Some say they have been directed to sign non-disclosure and Matt Hancock has flatly refused to answer parliamentary agreements. questions raised by local MP Matt Western, who has subsequently Now another local newspaper, the Leamington Courier has in - raised his concerns in the local press, warning that: terviewed one of these employees, who wishes to remain anony - “This is a scandal waiting to happen. I have heard from dis - mous but who insists that, contrary to assurances from the DHSC, tressed residents waiting months to start jobs, many completely the lab and its staff will be outside the NHS, and that people on without income. I have heard from scientists who fear lack of reg - universal credit are being recruited to a specific “trainee lab tech - ulation, poorly qualified staff and mismanagement at the facility. nician” role. They also now expect not to start work until the au - “I have heard from NHS groups who are concerned about the tumn “if I even start work at all”. undercutting of existing services, ‘stealth privatisation’ and out - "I have confirmation via e-mail from a staff member at Blue sourcing of vital healthcare assets. Yet the DHSC has ignored let - Arrow (who along with MEDACS is recruiting the staff) that I will ters, emails and questions from the media – which is unacceptable not get an NHS pension or any other benefits relating to working and keeps the public in the dark. with the NHS.” Last December then Test and Trace boss Dido Harding let slip The DHSC in statements to the local press has claimed that that the mega-lab would be run by a private company, Medacs, 200 staff are employed and working at the lab – and that it will with no expertise in medical science or laboratories. Medacs is a eventually create 1,800 jobs. subsidiary of the multinational Impellam Group, chaired by former However the secrecy, the obvious role of private contractors in Conservative Party deputy chair and tax exile Lord Ashcroft. recruiting the staff, the decision to keep the mega-lab separate from the local NHS and the bypassing of the professional body ‘Publicly owned and operated’? and the trade unions gives real grounds for concern that another In January The Lowdown reported the lab scientists’ professional privatised fiasco is under way. body, the Institute of Biomedical Science, warning: John Lister “It is vital that these labs have an appropriate skill mix and in - clude significant numbers of HCPC registered Biomedical and Clinical Scientists. We would not allow unregistered staff to run care in clinical settings such as medicine, nursing or radiography – why are labs being viewed as “different”? “We have professional registration in place for a reason – to protect the public.” By March it was clear that some staff were also being recruited by Sodexo on fixed term contracts to work in the megalab, making no mention of NHS terms and conditions, NHS Pensions, or UKAS accreditation.
Recommended publications
  • Privatised and Unprepared: the NHS Supply Chain

    Privatised and Unprepared: the NHS Supply Chain

    Privatised and Unprepared: The NHS Supply Chain This report is co-published by the University of Greenwich and We Own It Written by Prof David Hall Visiting professor at PSIRU, University of Greenwich Dr John Lister Visiting Senior Lecturer at Coventry University, Co-editor of The Lowdown and the We Own It team With additional material by Dr Helen Mercer Keep Our NHS Public Contents 1. Introduction 3 2. The Problem: Lack of PPE and Preparedness 5 A. Four Decades of Creeping Privatisation B. Continuous failure on PPE C. Rationing Demand instead of Boosting Supply 3. The Structure of NHS Supply Chain: How Does it Work? 10 A. Fragmentation and Outsourcing of Procurement B. Designating Approved Suppliers C. Monopoly suppliers of masks and gowns D. A Complex Web of Contractors E. Further Privatisation Failures: Stockpiles and Emergency Initiatives 4. Why Outsourcing Has Failed 22 A. Loss of Accountability and Public Interest B. Public Risks of a “Just in Time” Business Model C. No Gains in Efficiency or Expertise 5. The Solution: An NHS Supply Chain that Works for Us All 26 A. The Public Sector B. The Private Sector C. A Surge of Local Initiatives 6. Conclusion 31 7. Annexe: NHS Supply Chain Contractors 33 A. CTSPs: DHL, Vizient, Akeso, Foodbuy (Compass Group) B. Logistics and IT Contracts: Unipart, DXC Technology (formerly CSC, EDS) C. Other Major Contracts: Movianto, Clipper Logistics, Deloitte, Serco, Edenred 2 Privatised and Unprepared: The NHS Supply Chain 1. Introduction Months after the arrival of the Covid-19 pandemic, huge numbers of UK health and care workers still lack adequate personal protective equipment (PPE).
  • Healthpolicyreform.Pdf

    Healthpolicyreform.Pdf

    Health Policy Reform Global Health versus Private Profit Health Policy Reform Global Health versus Private Profit John Lister First published in 2013 by Libri Publishing Copyright © John Lister ISBN 978 1 907471 78 0 The right of John Lister to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in any retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechan- ical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the copyright holder for which application should be addressed in the first instance to the publishers. No liability shall be attached to the author, the copyright holder or the publishers for loss or damage of any nature suffered as a result of reliance on the reproduction of any of the contents of this publication or any errors or omissions in its contents. A CIP catalogue record for this book is available from The British Library Design by Carnegie Publishing Cover design by Helen Taylor Printed in the UK by Ashford Colour Press Libri Publishing Brunel House Volunteer Way Faringdon Oxfordshire SN7 7YR Tel: +44 (0)845 873 3837 www.libripublishing.co.uk Contents Acknowledgements ix Preface xi Chapter 1: Introduction 1 Chapter 2: A framework for analysing changes 19 Chapter 3: The World Health Organization 53 Chapter 4: The World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) 79 Chapter 5: Other organisations shaping health reforms
  • Privatised and Unprepared: the NHS Supply Chain

    Privatised and Unprepared: the NHS Supply Chain

    Privatised and Unprepared: The NHS Supply Chain This report is co-published by the University of Greenwich and We Own It Written by Prof David Hall Visiting professor at PSIRU, University of Greenwich Dr John Lister Visiting Senior Lecturer at Coventry University, Co-editor of The Lowdown and the We Own It team With additional material by Dr Helen Mercer Keep Our NHS Public Contents 1. Introduction 3 2. The Problem: Lack of PPE and Preparedness 5 A. Four Decades of Creeping Privatisation B. Continuous failure on PPE C. Rationing Demand instead of Boosting Supply 3. The Structure of NHS Supply Chain: How Does it Work? 10 A. Fragmentation and Outsourcing of Procurement B. Designating Approved Suppliers C. Monopoly suppliers of masks and gowns D. A Complex Web of Contractors E. Further Privatisation Failures: Stockpiles and Emergency Initiatives 4. Why Outsourcing Has Failed 22 A. Loss of Accountability and Public Interest B. Public Risks of a “Just in Time” Business Model C. No Gains in Efficiency or Expertise 5. The Solution: An NHS Supply Chain that Works for Us All 26 A. The Public Sector B. The Private Sector C. A Surge of Local Initiatives 6. Conclusion 31 7. Annexe: NHS Supply Chain Contractors 33 A. CTSPs: DHL, Vizient, Akeso, Foodbuy (Compass Group) B. Logistics and IT Contracts: Unipart, DXC Technology (formerly CSC, EDS) C. Other Major Contracts: Movianto, Clipper Logistics, Deloitte, Serco, Edenred 2 Privatised and Unprepared: The NHS Supply Chain 1. Introduction Months after the arrival of the Covid-19 pandemic, huge numbers of UK health and care workers still lack adequate personal protective equipment (PPE).
  • Towards Health-Equitable Globalisation: Rights, Regulation and Redistribution Final Report to the Commission on Social Determinants of Health

    Towards Health-Equitable Globalisation: Rights, Regulation and Redistribution Final Report to the Commission on Social Determinants of Health

    Globalization and Health Knowledge Network: Research Papers Towards Health-Equitable Globalisation: Rights, Regulation and Redistribution Final Report to the Commission on Social Determinants of Health Globalization Knowledge Network Final Report to the Commission on Social Determinants of Health 1 Preface The Globalization Knowledge Network (GKN) was formed in 2005 with the purpose of examining how contemporary globalization was infl uencing social determinants of health. It was one of nine Knowledge Networks providing evidence-informed guidance to the work of the World Health Organization’s Commission on Social Determinants of Health (2005-2008): like most of the Knowledge Networks, its operations were fi nanced by an external funder (in this case, the International Affairs Directorate of Health Canada, Canada’s national ministry of health). The GKN conducted two face-to-face meetings to debate, discuss, outline and review its work, and produced thirteen background papers and a Final Report. These papers and the Final Report underwent extensive internal and external peer review to ensure that their fi ndings and policy inferences accurately refl ected available evidence and scholarship. This GKN publication series was prepared under the general editorship of Ronald Labonté, with assistance from Vivien Runnels and copy-editing provided by Wayne Harding. All views expressed are exclusively those of the authors. A complete list of titles in the publication series appears on the inside back cover of this monograph. Acknowledgments and disclaimers This report is the product of some 16 months’ work by a large number of people. The efforts of all writing groups (see pages 81-84); a large number of external reviewers (see page 85); and Corinne Packer, Vivien Runnels, Kirsten Stoebenau, Elizabeth Venditti and Joëlle Walker at the Institute of Population Health Hub have been indispensable.
  • “The Welfare State, Which Gives Us Public Health Care, Public Education

    “The Welfare State, Which Gives Us Public Health Care, Public Education

    Executive Summary Lessons Learned on the UK Experience of Privatization of Public Services Background For some time, the Ontario Liberal government has been getting advice from Britain’s Blair government and their consultants on restructuring government services. Last year, one of Blair’s key advisors was flown in to make a presentation to the Ontario Cabinet. McGuinty speaks highly of the British experience. “The welfare A delegation from the Ontario Federation of Labour, state, which including OFL leaders along with representatives gives us public from CUPE, CUPW, ETFO, OECTA, and OPSEU, health care, studied the “Transformation of Government” agenda in Britain firsthand as it became evident that the public Ontario Liberals are looking across the ocean for education, inspiration on restructuring and privatizing public systems important public services. delivering The study tour included sessions with leading hydro, water academics, union leaders, and community activists. and They all told a part of the story of the fall-out from this restructuring. Briefly, here are some of the transportation, lessons learned from this tour. is the great- unopened Setting the Stage for Fragmentation and Privatization oyster.” As aptly put by Professor Allyson Pollock, the welfare state, which gives us public health care, public education, public systems delivering hydro, water and transportation, is the great-unopened oyster. Health and education alone account for up to 20% of western countries’ gross domestic profit (GDP). Profit-making companies around the world see this as money for themselves. Report of the OFL Delegation on the UK Experience with P3s - 2 - Also, wealthy countries are wrongly convinced that “The only ones they will have a trade advantage and economic who benefit benefit by developing the template for moving to from these competitive and private models for delivering public services, with a view to making profits from the schemes are export of the model.
  • Towards Health-Equitable Globalisation: Rights, Regulation and Redistribution

    Towards Health-Equitable Globalisation: Rights, Regulation and Redistribution

    Towards Health-Equitable Globalisation: Rights, Regulation and Redistribution Final Report to the Commission on Social Determinants of Health Globalisation Knowledge Network Ronald Labonté (Chair) Ted Schrecker (Hub Coordinator) Final Report Writing Group: Ronald Labonté (lead author) Chantal Blouin Mickey Chopra Kelley Lee Corinne Packer Mike Rowson Ted Schrecker David Woodward Drafting Assistance: Patrick Bond Giovanni Andrea Cornia Carlos Correa Corinna Hawkes Meri Koivusalo John Lister Vivien Runnels David Sanders Kirsten Stoebenau Sebastian Taylor Zoë Wilson Additional Technical Assistance: Joëlle Walker Elizabeth Venditti Globalisation Knowledge Network final report, 29 June 2007 2 Globalisation Knowledge Network final report, 29 June 2007 3 Table of contents Table of acronyms 5 Acknowledgements and disclaimers 8 Executive summary 9 1. Introduction: Globalisation’s challenges to reducing health inequities 21 1.1 Focus on the global marketplace 22 1.2 Globalisation and social determinants of health: Mapping the linkages 24 1.3 The importance of being clear about policy goals 26 1.4 Globalisation’s contested gains: It all depends 28 1.5 What is left out 31 2. Globalisation’s role in increasing health inequalities: An overview 34 3. Globalisation and health (in)equity: Key pathways and policy implications 43 3.1 Globalisation magnifies asymmetries in power and resources 43 3.1.1 Initial endowments and primary commodity traps 45 3.1.2 Global labour markets 46 3.1.3 Global market integration and national policy space 53 3.2 The global
  • Private Finance Initiative

    Private Finance Initiative

    House of Commons Treasury Committee Private Finance Initiative Written Evidence Only those submissions written specifically for the Committee and accepted by the Committee as evidence are included. Ordered to be published Tuesday 17 May 2011 List of written evidence 1 North Yorkshire Waste Action Group 3 2 Nick Collard 10 3 British Medical Association 19 4 Colin Raynor 23 5 Martin Blaiklock, Consultant, Infrastructure and energy Project Finance 31 6 Royal Institute of British Architects 38 7 Lisa Smeaton 43 8 John Sullivan 44 9 PricewaterhouseCoopers 45 10 Canmore Partnership Ltd 53 11 NHS Confederation 59 12 John Laing 64 13 Trampower 70 14 CBI 72 15 Hogan Lovells LLP 78 16 Donald Roy 84 17 Skanska 87 18 Greg Dropkin & Sam Semoff 94 19 Balfour Beatty 99 20 Health Care Audit Consultants Ltd 107 21 John Patrick Heawood 114 22 BDO LLP 118 23 Kent Police 124 24 Dr Yseult Marique, Lecturer, University of Essex 129 25 Ron Hodges 137 26 Edward Milner 142 27 UK Contractors Group Ltd 143 28 Andrew Barrie, Vice President Operations & Jon Mitchell, Development Director, KBR International Government & Defence 150 29 Dr Richard Thorne 156 30 Meridiam Infrastructure 157 31 PPP Forum 164 32 Dundas & Wilson C.S. LLP 172 33 Foundation Trust Network 180 34 Mr Geoff Haley, Global Chairman, International Project Finance Association 183 35 Dr Andrew Edkins, Graham Ive & Murray 194 36 CIPFA 200 37 Bill MacKeith, Founding member, Oxon PFI Alert Group (established 1999), 206 Committee member, Oxon Keep Our NHS Public, Assistant secretary, Oxford & District Trades Union Council 38 Frances Kelly 207 39 Dr James Robertson 208 40 Transport for London 211 41 Globalise Resistance 219 42 Barclays Infrastructure Funds Management Ltd 230 43 North Tees and Hartlepool NHS Foundation Trust 239 44 Dr Chris Lonsdale, University of Birmingham 245 3 Written evidence submitted by North Yorkshire Waste Action Group EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.
  • A Picture of Health

    A Picture of Health

    A PICTURE OF HEALTH THE NHS AT 70 AND ITS FUTURE Edited by Jonathan Ashworth MP Fabian Ideas 646 The Fabian Society is Britain’s oldest political think tank. Since 1884 the society has played a central role in developing political ideas and public policy on the left. Through a wide range of publications and events the society influences political and public thinking, but also provides a space for broad and open-minded debate, drawing on an unrivalled external network and its own expert research and analysis. The society is alone among think tanks in being a democratically-constituted membership organisation, with over 7,000 members. During its history the membership has included many of the key thinkers on the British left and every Labour prime minister. Today it counts over 200 parliamentarians in its number. Member-led activity includes 70 local Fabian societies, the Scottish and Welsh Fabians, the Fabian Women’s Network and the Young Fabians, which is itself the leading organisation on the left for young people to debate and influence political ideas. The society was one of the original founders of the Labour party and is constitutionally affiliated to the party. It is however editorially, organisationally and financially independent and works with a wide range of partners of all political persuasions and none. Fabian Society 61 Petty France London SW1H 9EU www.fabians.org.uk Fabian Ideas 646 First published July 2018 ISBN 978-0-7163-0646-7 Editorial director: Kate Murray Editorial assistant: Vanesha Singh This pamphlet, like all publications of the Fabian Society, represents not the collective views of the society but only the views of the authors.
  • Is Health Care in England Really on the Road to Privatization?

    Is Health Care in England Really on the Road to Privatization?

    “Are We There Yet?” Is Health Care in England Really on the Road to Privatization? Alex Waddan Associate Professor School of History, Politics and International Relations University of Leicester Leicester, LE1 7RH United Kingdom [email protected] Abstract: In 2010 the Conservative led Coalition government promptly set about reform of the English NHS. Opponents denounced the resulting legislation, the Health and Social Care Act of 2012, as hastening the beloved NHS towards privatization. This was now a familiar refrain as a number of reforms from the late 1980s onwards had provoked the same critique. This paper asks whether the HSC, building on those previous reforms, did finally set health care arrangements in England on the road to privatization. This question raises the conceptual problem of measuring change, which is particularly problematic in the multi-tiered field of health policy where “privatization” means different things to different stakeholders. In order to provide an organizing framework this paper combines the literature on policy change with that on health care systems. The latter literature has identified three dimensions of health care arrangements: The financing of care, the provision care, and the regulation of care. The paper suggests that the HSC, building on previous reforms, reinforces the emergence of different policy trajectories with regard to privatization across these three dimensions 1 . “Are We There Yet?” Is Health Care in England Really on the Road to Privatization? The United States is not the only country to find its health care arrangements at the center of political debate. The United Kingdom too has seen increasing argument over whether its health system is being fundamentally re-ordered.
  • Improving Equity in Health by Addressing Social Determinants

    Improving Equity in Health by Addressing Social Determinants

    Improving Equity in Health by Addressing Social Determinants Edited by: The Commission on Social Determinants of Health Knowledge Networks, Jennifer H. Lee and Ritu Sadana Improving Equity in Health by Addressing Social Determinants Edited by: The Commission on Social Determinants of Health Knowledge Networks, Jennifer H. Lee and Ritu Sadana Acknowledgements We are grateful to the authors and members of the Knowledge Networks created to inform the work of the Commission on Social Determinants of Health (2005-2008) for their contributions to this book. We are equally grateful to Finn Diderichsen and José Carvalho de Noronha for their extensive review, insightful comments and suggestions and to Lindsey Martinez-Mackey for technical editing the chapters to provide balanced content given the range of perspectives contained. The Department of Health, United Kingdom, provided financial support in the editing and production of this volume. We appreciate the technical and managerial support that Daniel Albrecht (WHO) provided in the preparation and edition of earlier drafts of this book. The book was copy-edited by Lina Tucker Reinders. Design and Layout: Anil Kumar, Indite Global WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data Improving equity in health by addressing social determinants / edited by the Commission on Social Determinants of Health Knowledge Networks, Jennifer H. Lee and Ritu Sadana. 1.Socioeconomic factors. 2. Health care rationing. 3. Health services accessibility. 4. Health status disparities. 5. Social change. 6.Internationality. 7. Child welfare - trends. 8. Sex factors. 9. Urban health. 10. National health programs - ethics. I. Commission on Social Determinants of Health. II. Lee, Jennifer H. III. Sadana, Ritu.