Eutheria (Placental Mammals) Thought of As More Primitive

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Eutheria (Placental Mammals) Thought of As More Primitive Eutheria (Placental Introductory article Mammals) Article Contents . Introduction J David Archibald, San Diego State University, San Diego, California, USA . Basic Design . Taxonomic and Ecological Diversity Eutheria includes one of three major clades of mammals, the extant members of which are . Fossil History and Distribution referred to as placentals. Phylogeny Introduction doi: 10.1038/npg.els.0004123 Eutheria (or Placentalia) is the most taxonomically diverse each. Except for placentals that have supernumerary teeth of three branches or clades of mammals, the other two (e.g. some whales, armadillos, etc.), in extant placentals, the being Metatheria (or Marsupialia) and Prototheria (or number of teeth is at most three upper and lower incisors, Monotremata). When named by Gill in 1872, Eutheria in- one upper and lower canine, four upper and lower premo- cluded both marsupials and placentals. It was Huxley in lars and three upper and lower molars. Pigs retain this pat- 1880 who recognized Eutheria basically as used today to tern, and except for one fewer upper molar, a domestic dog include only placentals. McKenna and Bell in their Clas- does as well. Compared to reptiles, mammals have fewer sification of Mammals published in 1997, chose to use Pla- skull bones through fusion and loss, although bones are centalia rather than Eutheria to avoid the confusion of variously emphasized in each of the three major mammalian what taxa should be included in Eutheria. Others such as taxa. See also: Digestive system of mammals; Ingestion in Rougier have used Eutheria and Placentalia in the sense mammals; Mesozoic mammals; Reptilia (reptiles) used here. Placentalia includes all extant placentals and Physiologically, mammals are all endotherms with var- their most recent common ancestor. Eutheria is retained to ying degrees of efficiency. They are also homeothermic include all extinct mammals that share a more recent com- with a relatively high resting temperature. These charac- mon ancestor with placentals than they do with Met- teristics are also found in birds, but because of anatomical atheria. See also: Mammalia (mammals); Marsupialia differences, the attainment of endothermy evolved con- (marsupials); Monotremata vergently in mammals and birds. In mammals, the large aorta leaving the heart bends to the left while in birds and their reptilian relatives the aorta bends to the right. Al- though both birds and mammals have diaphragms, they Basic Design are formed very differently, again indicating convergent evolution. See also: Vertebrate functional morphology and Eutherians share with all other mammals some key inno- physiology; Thermoregulation in vertebrates vations that differentiate them from other amniote verte- Reproductively, mammals show all three major kinds of brates – Reptilia (including Aves). While in reptiles there reproduction found in amniote vertebrates – oviparity or can be many generations of teeth, in mammals there are at egg-laying, ovoviviparity where the embryo is retained in- most two. Eutherians, if they have teeth, retain the ancestral ternally by the mother but there is little maternal support, mammal condition of two generations (deciduous and per- and euviviparity where the embryo is retained internally by manent) of teeth. Reptiles have a jaw joint composed of the the mother and much support is given by the mother. It is articular (lower jaw) and quadrate (upper jaw), and have this last condition, euviviparity, that characterizes placen- only one ear ossicle, the columella. In all mammals, the tals. The name placental derives from the dominant extra- articular and quadrate become incorporated into the middle embryonic structure of the same name found in this group. ear as the outermost two ear ossicles, the malleus and incus, Both marsupials and placentals have a placenta but of con- respectively, which articulate with the innermost stapes siderably different structure. In marsupials two extraem- (columella). While prototherians lack teeth as adults, met- bryonic structures, the yolk sac and the chorion, fuse atherians retain at most five upper and four lower incisors, through part of their extent to form the choriovitelline pla- one upper and one lower canine, three upper and three lower centa. In placentals, the allantois and chorion fuse to form premolars, four upper and lower molars each. This condi- the chorioallantoic placenta. Although the choriovitelline tion is still found in the opossum, common to many areas of placenta of the marsupial compared to the chorioallantoic North America. Primitively, eutherians had a similar placenta of the placental does not produce as many hor- number of incisors and canines, but had five upper and mones to sustain itself or provide as long a period of lower premolars each and three upper and lower molars sustenance for the developing embryo, it should not be ENCYCLOPEDIA OF LIFE SCIENCES & 2005, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. www.els.net 1 Eutheria (Placental Mammals) thought of as more primitive. Rather, because the two kinds ities while pregnant. Placentals, similar to other mammals, of placenta are formed differently they almost certainly are endothermic. This means they produce their heat evolved convergently. See also: Reproduction in eutherian through metabolic means, perhaps as much as 80% of con- mammals; Reproduction in mammals: general overview; sumed food goes towards maintaining endothermy. The Reproduction in monotremes and marsupials common ancestor of all mammals, as well as that leading to eutherians, was a small, insectivorous quadruped that main- tained five digits on all four limbs. Such a generalized pat- tern permitted a greater diversity of stance and locomotion Taxonomic and Ecological Diversity in later eutherians. For example, placentals have limbs greatly modified for swimming, flight, digging, fleet-foot- Almost 4700 genera of extinct and extant eutherians are edness, capture of prey, brachiation, etc. In contrast, birds recognized. Of these, some 1050 are extant and include al- are represented by more species today (9000) than are pla- most 4400 extant species (Table1). Although relatively low in centals but show less diversity in locomotory patterns. This taxonomic abundance, placentals (extant eutherians) argu- is because in contrast to mammals, the common ancestor of ably occupy one of the widest arrays of environments of any birds (a small theropod dinosaur) had already acquired a comparable group of vertebrates. They range in size from specialized habitus with hindlimbs used for locomotion and shrews to blue whales, from completely marine through forelimbs for capture of prey (flight came later). Today pla- terrestrial to fully volant. Three important factors that centals are found in every ocean and with a few exceptions played a role in this considerable ecological diversity are on all landmasses. Even Antarctica has seals breeding on mode of reproduction, level of metabolism and an ancestral, coastal beaches and bats have reached most oceanic islands. generalized quadrupedal stance. The mode of reproduction See also:Aves(birds) in placentals, euviviparity, includes considerable in utero development of the embryo with all support and sustenance coming from the mother through the chorioallantoic placenta. This allows the mother to continue normal activ- Fossil History and Distribution Table 1 Numbers of species of living eutherians (placental) The earliest known fossils of eutherians come from Asia and North America. The oldest known eutherian is Eomaia Class from China, which comprises of a flattened skeleton with Mammalia skull from beds of Barremian age ( 125 million years ago Subclass (Ma). 2001). Other early eutherians are restricted to mostly Prototheria dental and a few skull remains. The type and only known Theria specimen of Montanalestes comes from beds of Aptian– Infraclass Albian age ( 110 million years old) in Montana. Pro- Marsupialia kennalestes comes from slightly younger beds ( 105 mil- Placentalia lion years old) in Mongolia, but is represented by Order numerous, mostly undescribed dental remains. All three Xenarthra (29 species) taxa, and some other slightly younger forms, also from Pholidota (7 species) Asia, show the typical eutherian pattern of at most five Lagomorpha (80 species) upper and lower premolars and three upper and lower Rodentia (2024 species) molars. The last upper and lower premolars in the earliest Macroscelidea (15 species) eutherians as compared to metatherians already show Primates (236 species) trends towards molarization (i.e. adding extra cusps found Scandentia (19 species) on molars). The labial (cheek side) of the upper molars has Dermoptera (2 species) a wide area called the stylar shelf which unlike in contem- Chiroptera (928 species) porary metatherians has few cusps. The back, lower mar- Carnivora (271 species) gin of the lower jaw, the dentary, has a projection (angular Insectivora (429 species) process) that points backwards in eutherians but internally Artiodactyla (220 species) in metatherians. These forms were all small, ranging in size Cetacea (78 species) from a shrew to an opossum. The earliest eutherian Eomaia Tubulidentata (1 species) shows both scansorial (climbing) and arboreal (tree-living) Perissodactyla (18 species) adaptations, compared to other Cretaceous eutherians Hyracoidea (6 species) that, when known, are terrestrial and sometimes cursorial Proboscidea (2 species) (running). Diets were mostly carnivorous to insectivorous, Sirenia (5 species) but omnivory and probably
Recommended publications
  • Dating Placentalia: Morphological Clocks Fail to Close the Molecular-Fossil Gap
    Puttick, M. N., Thomas, G. H., & Benton, M. J. (2016). Dating placentalia: Morphological clocks fail to close the molecular-fossil gap. Evolution, 70(4), 873-886. https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.12907 Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record License (if available): CC BY Link to published version (if available): 10.1111/evo.12907 Link to publication record in Explore Bristol Research PDF-document © 2016 The Author(s). Evolution published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of The Society for the Study of Evolution. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. University of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research General rights This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the reference above. Full terms of use are available: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/red/research-policy/pure/user-guides/ebr-terms/ ORIGINAL ARTICLE doi:10.1111/evo.12907 Dating placentalia: Morphological clocks fail to close the molecular fossil gap Mark N. Puttick,1,2 Gavin H. Thomas,3 and Michael J. Benton1 1School of Earth Sciences, Life Sciences Building, Tyndall Avenue, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TQ, United Kingdom 2E-mail: [email protected] 3Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, Alfred Denny Building, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield, S10 2TN, United Kingdom Received January 31, 2015 Accepted March 7, 2016 Dating the origin of Placentalia has been a contentious issue for biologists and paleontologists.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Reconstruction of the Inner Ear of Leptictidium Auderiense
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by RERO DOC Digital Library Published in "Paläontologische Zeitschrift 90(1): 153–171, 2016" which should be cited to refer to this work. Digital reconstruction of the inner ear of Leptictidium auderiense (Leptictida, Mammalia) and North American leptictids reveals new insight into leptictidan locomotor agility Irina Ruf1,2 • Virginie Volpato1,3 • Kenneth D. Rose4 • Guillaume Billet2,5 • Christian de Muizon5 • Thomas Lehmann1 Abstract Leptictida are basal Paleocene to Oligocene semicircular canals than the leptictids under study. Our eutherians from Europe and North America comprising estimations reveal that Leptictidium was a very agile ani- species with highly specialized postcranial features mal with agility score values (4.6 and 5.5, respectively) including elongated hind limbs. Among them, the Euro- comparable to Macroscelidea and extant bipedal saltatory pean Leptictidium was probably a bipedal runner or jum- placentals. Leptictis and Palaeictops have lower agility per. Because the semicircular canals of the inner ear are scores (3.4 to 4.1), which correspond to the more gener- involved in detecting angular acceleration of the head, their alized types of locomotion (e.g., terrestrial, cursorial) of morphometry can be used as a proxy to elucidate the agility most extant mammals. In contrast, the angular velocity in fossil mammals. Here we provide the first insight into magnitude predicted from semicircular canal angles sup- inner ear anatomy and morphometry of Leptictida based on ports a conflicting pattern of agility among leptictidans, but high-resolution computed tomography of a new specimen the significance of these differences might be challenged of Leptictidium auderiense from the middle Eocene Messel when more is known about intraspecific variation and the Pit (Germany) and specimens of the North American pattern of semicircular canal angles in non-primate Leptictis and Palaeictops.
    [Show full text]
  • Classification of Mammals 61
    © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FORCHAPTER SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION Classification © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC 4 NOT FORof SALE MammalsOR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC. NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION. 2ND PAGES 9781284032093_CH04_0060.indd 60 8/28/13 12:08 PM CHAPTER 4: Classification of Mammals 61 © Jones Despite& Bartlett their Learning,remarkable success, LLC mammals are much less© Jones stress & onBartlett the taxonomic Learning, aspect LLCof mammalogy, but rather as diverse than are most invertebrate groups. This is probably an attempt to provide students with sufficient information NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FORattributable SALE OR to theirDISTRIBUTION far greater individual size, to the high on the various kinds of mammals to make the subsequent energy requirements of endothermy, and thus to the inabil- discussions of mammalian biology meaningful.
    [Show full text]
  • Learning About Mammals
    Learning About Mammals The mammals (Class Mammalia) includes everything from mice to elephants, bats to whales and, of course, man. The amazing diversity of mammals is what has allowed them to live in any habitat from desert to arctic to the deep ocean. They live in trees, they live on the ground, they live underground, and in caves. Some are active during the day (diurnal), while some are active at night (nocturnal) and some are just active at dawn and dusk (crepuscular). They live alone (solitary) or in great herds (gregarious). They mate for life (monogamous) or form harems (polygamous). They eat meat (carnivores), they eat plants (herbivores) and they eat both (omnivores). They fill every niche imaginable. Mammals come in all shapes and sizes from the tiny pygmy shrew, weighing 1/10 of an ounce (2.8 grams), to the blue whale, weighing more than 300,000 pounds! They have a huge variation in life span from a small rodent living one year to an elephant living 70 years. Generally, the bigger the mammal, the longer the life span, except for bats, which are as small as rodents, but can live for up to 20 years. Though huge variation exists in mammals, there are a few physical traits that unite them. 1) Mammals are covered with body hair (fur). Though marine mammals, like dolphins and whales, have traded the benefits of body hair for better aerodynamics for traveling in water, they do still have some bristly hair on their faces (and embryonically - before birth). Hair is important for keeping mammals warm in cold climates, protecting them from sunburn and scratches, and used to warn off others, like when a dog raises the hair on its neck.
    [Show full text]
  • A Phylogeny and Timescale for Marsupial Evolution Based on Sequences for Five Nuclear Genes
    J Mammal Evol DOI 10.1007/s10914-007-9062-6 ORIGINAL PAPER A Phylogeny and Timescale for Marsupial Evolution Based on Sequences for Five Nuclear Genes Robert W. Meredith & Michael Westerman & Judd A. Case & Mark S. Springer # Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2007 Abstract Even though marsupials are taxonomically less diverse than placentals, they exhibit comparable morphological and ecological diversity. However, much of their fossil record is thought to be missing, particularly for the Australasian groups. The more than 330 living species of marsupials are grouped into three American (Didelphimorphia, Microbiotheria, and Paucituberculata) and four Australasian (Dasyuromorphia, Diprotodontia, Notoryctemorphia, and Peramelemorphia) orders. Interordinal relationships have been investigated using a wide range of methods that have often yielded contradictory results. Much of the controversy has focused on the placement of Dromiciops gliroides (Microbiotheria). Studies either support a sister-taxon relationship to a monophyletic Australasian clade or a nested position within the Australasian radiation. Familial relationships within the Diprotodontia have also proved difficult to resolve. Here, we examine higher-level marsupial relationships using a nuclear multigene molecular data set representing all living orders. Protein-coding portions of ApoB, BRCA1, IRBP, Rag1, and vWF were analyzed using maximum parsimony, maximum likelihood, and Bayesian methods. Two different Bayesian relaxed molecular clock methods were employed to construct a timescale for marsupial evolution and estimate the unrepresented basal branch length (UBBL). Maximum likelihood and Bayesian results suggest that the root of the marsupial tree is between Didelphimorphia and all other marsupials. All methods provide strong support for the monophyly of Australidelphia. Within Australidelphia, Dromiciops is the sister-taxon to a monophyletic Australasian clade.
    [Show full text]
  • Mammalian Species 117
    MAMMALIANSPECIES No. 117, pp. 14, 5 figs. Rhynchocyon chrysopygus. BY Galen B. Rathbun Published 8 June 1979 by the American Society of Mammalogists Rhynchocyon Peters, 1847 cyon chrysopygus apparently does not occur in the gallery forests of the Tana River, in the ground-water forest at Witu, or in the Rhynchocyon Peters, 1W7:36, type species Rhynchocyon cirnei dry bushlands between the Galana and Tana rivers. This ele- Peters by monotypy. phant-shrew's habitat is being cleared for exotic forest plantations Rhir~onaxThomas, 1918:370, type species Rh~nchoc~onchr~so- and agriculture all along the coast, resulting in a discontinuous pygus Gunther. and reduced distribution. It will re-occupy fallow agricultural land that is allowed to become overgrown with dense bush (Rathbun, CONTEXT AND CONTENT. Order Macroscelidea, Fam- ily Macroscelididae, Subfamily Rhynch~c~oninae.Corbet and unpublished data)' Hanks (1968) recognized three allopatric species of Rhynchocyon FOSSIL RECORD. As far as is known, the Macrosceli- (figure 1) for which they wrote the following key: didae have always been endemic to Africa (Patterson, 1%5). But- ler and Hopwood (1957) described Rhynchocyon clarki from the 1 Rump straw-colored, contrasting sharply with surround- early Miocene beds of Songhor, Kenya (near Lake Victoria). Ad- ing rufous pelage ----------.-------.-------R. chrysopygus ditional Miocene material from Rusinga Island, Kenya, has been Rump not straw-colored ---------.------.-------------------2 referred to this extinct form (Patterson, 1%5), which was smaller 2(1) Rump and posterior half of back with a pattern of dark than the extant species of Rhynchocyon. R. clarki contributes lines or spots on a yellowish-brown or rufous ground; significantly to the forest related fossil mammal fauna from Ru- top of head without a rufous tinge ._._._....._._R.
    [Show full text]
  • New Large Leptictid Insectivore from the Late Paleogene of South Dakota, USA
    New large leptictid insectivore from the Late Paleogene of South Dakota, USA TJ MEEHAN and LARRY D. MARTIN Meehan, T.J. and Martin, L.D. 2012. New large leptictid insectivore from the Late Paleogene of South Dakota, USA. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 57 (3): 509–518. From a skull and mandible, we describe a new genus and species of a primitive insectivore (Mammalia: Insectivora: Leptictida: Leptictidae). Its large body size and higher−crowned teeth indicate a different feeding ecology from other leptictid insectivores. With evidence of some heavy, flat wear on the molariform teeth, its shift in diet was likely to greater herbivory. Unlike the narrow snout of Blacktops, this new leptictid retains a broad snout, suggesting that small verte− brates were still important dietary components. The specimen was collected from the floodplain deposits of the lower or middle White River Group of South Dakota, which represent the latest Eocene to earliest Oligocene (Chadronian and Orellan North American Land Mammal “Ages”). Key words: Mammalia, Leptictidae, Leptictis, Megaleptictis, Eocene, Oligocene, White River Group, South Dakota, North America. TJ Meehan [[email protected]], Research Associate, Section of Vertebrate Paleontology, Carnegie Museum of Natural History, 4400 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA; Larry D. Martin [[email protected]], Division of Vertebrate Paleontology, Natural History Museum and Biodiversity Re− search Center, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA. Received 4 April 2011, accepted 25 July 2011, available online 17 August 2011. Introduction molariform teeth. A fossa in this region at least suggests in− creased snout mobility, but no definitive anatomical argument Leptictida is a primitive order of placental, insectivorous has been made to support a highly mobile cartilaginous snout mammals convergent to extant sengis or elephant “shrews” tip, as in sengis.
    [Show full text]
  • Convergent Evolution in the Euarchontoglires
    This is a repository copy of Convergent evolution in the Euarchontoglires. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/133262/ Version: Published Version Article: Morris, Philip James Rencher, Cobb, Samuel Nicholas Frederick orcid.org/0000-0002- 8360-8024 and Cox, Philip Graham orcid.org/0000-0001-9782-2358 (2018) Convergent evolution in the Euarchontoglires. Biology letters. 2018036. ISSN 1744-957X https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2018.0366 Reuse This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licence. This licence allows you to distribute, remix, tweak, and build upon the work, even commercially, as long as you credit the authors for the original work. More information and the full terms of the licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Downloaded from http://rsbl.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on August 1, 2018 Evolutionary biology Convergent evolution in the rsbl.royalsocietypublishing.org Euarchontoglires Philip J. R. Morris1, Samuel N. F. Cobb2 and Philip G. Cox2 1Hull York Medical School, University of Hull, Hull HU6 7RX, UK Research 2Department of Archaeology and Hull York Medical School, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK SNFC, 0000-0002-8360-8024; PGC, 0000-0001-9782-2358 Cite this article: Morris PJR, Cobb SNF, Cox PG. 2018 Convergent evolution in the Convergence—the independent evolution of similar phenotypes in distantly Euarchontoglires.
    [Show full text]
  • A Note on the Climbing Abilities of Giant Anteaters, Myrmecophaga Tridactyla (Xenarthra, Myrmecophagidae)
    BOL MUS BIOL MELLO LEITÃO (N SÉR) 15:41-46 JUNHO DE 2003 41 A note on the climbing abilities of giant anteaters, Myrmecophaga tridactyla (Xenarthra, Myrmecophagidae) Robert J Young1*, Carlyle M Coelho2 and Dalía R Wieloch2 ABSTRACT: In this note we provide seven observations of climbing behaviour by giant anteaters Five observations were recorded in the field: three of giant anteaters climbing on top of 15 to 20 metre high termite mounds, and two observations of giant anteaters in trees In these cases the animals were apparently trying to obtain food The other two observations are from captivity, one involves a juvenile animal that several times over a three month period climbed in a tree to the height of around 20 metres The final observation, involves an adult female that after being separated from her mother climbed on two occasions over a wall with a fence on top (total height 2 metres) to be reunited with her mother It therefore seems that, despite the fact only one other record of climbing behaviour by giant anteaters exists in the scientific literature that giant anteaters have the ability to climb It also may be the case that young adults are highly motivated to stay with their mothers Key words: giant anteater, Myrmecophaga tridactyla, climbing behaviour, wild, zoos RESUMO: Nota sobre as habilidades trepadoras do tamanduá-bandeira, Myrmecophaga tridactyla (Xenarthra, Myrmecophagidae) Nesta nota apresentamos sete registros de comportamento de subir expressado por tamanduá-bandeira Temos cinco exemplos da natureza: três de tamanduás-
    [Show full text]
  • Constraints on the Timescale of Animal Evolutionary History
    Palaeontologia Electronica palaeo-electronica.org Constraints on the timescale of animal evolutionary history Michael J. Benton, Philip C.J. Donoghue, Robert J. Asher, Matt Friedman, Thomas J. Near, and Jakob Vinther ABSTRACT Dating the tree of life is a core endeavor in evolutionary biology. Rates of evolution are fundamental to nearly every evolutionary model and process. Rates need dates. There is much debate on the most appropriate and reasonable ways in which to date the tree of life, and recent work has highlighted some confusions and complexities that can be avoided. Whether phylogenetic trees are dated after they have been estab- lished, or as part of the process of tree finding, practitioners need to know which cali- brations to use. We emphasize the importance of identifying crown (not stem) fossils, levels of confidence in their attribution to the crown, current chronostratigraphic preci- sion, the primacy of the host geological formation and asymmetric confidence intervals. Here we present calibrations for 88 key nodes across the phylogeny of animals, rang- ing from the root of Metazoa to the last common ancestor of Homo sapiens. Close attention to detail is constantly required: for example, the classic bird-mammal date (base of crown Amniota) has often been given as 310-315 Ma; the 2014 international time scale indicates a minimum age of 318 Ma. Michael J. Benton. School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1RJ, U.K. [email protected] Philip C.J. Donoghue. School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1RJ, U.K. [email protected] Robert J.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Material
    Adaptation of mammalian myosin II sequences to body mass Mark N Wass*1, Sarah T Jeanfavre*1,2, Michael P Coghlan*1, Martin Ridout#, Anthony J Baines*3 and Michael A Geeves*3 School of Biosciences*, and School of Mathematics#, Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK 1. Equal contribution 2. Current address: Broad Institute, 415 Main Street, 7029-K, Cambridge MA 02142 3. Joint corresponding authors Key words: selection, muscle contraction, mammalian physiology, heart rate Address for correspondence: Prof M.A.Geeves School of Biosciences, University of Kent, Canterbury CT1 7NJ UK [email protected] tel 44 1227827597 Dr A J Baines School of Biosciences, University of Kent, Canterbury CT1 7NJ UK [email protected] tel 44 1227 823462 SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL Supplementary Table 1. Source of Myosin sequences and the mass of each species used in the analysis of Fig 1 & 2 Species Isoform Mass Skeletal Skeletal Embryonic Skeletal α- β-cardiac Perinatal Non- Non- Smooth Extraocular Slow (kg) 2d/x 2a 2b cardiac muscle A muscle B Muscle Tonic Human P12882 Q9UKX2 251757455 Q9Y623 P13533 P12883 P13535 P35579 219841954 13432177 110624781 599045671 68a Bonobo 675746236 397494570 675746242 675746226 397473260 397473262 675746209 675764569 675746138 675746206 675798456 45.5a Macaque 544497116 544497114 544497126 109113269 544446347 544446351 544497122 383408157 384940798 387541766 544497107 544465262 6.55b Tarsier 640786419 640786435 640786417 640818214 640818212 640786413 640796733 640805785 640786411 640822915 0.1315c
    [Show full text]
  • The Ancestral Eutherian Karyotype Is Present in Xenarthra
    The Ancestral Eutherian Karyotype Is Present in Xenarthra Marta Svartman*, Gary Stone, Roscoe Stanyon Comparative Molecular Cytogenetics Core, Genetics Branch, National Cancer Institute-Frederick, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America Molecular studies have led recently to the proposal of a new super-ordinal arrangement of the 18 extant Eutherian orders. From the four proposed super-orders, Afrotheria and Xenarthra were considered the most basal. Chromosome- painting studies with human probes in these two mammalian groups are thus key in the quest to establish the ancestral Eutherian karyotype. Although a reasonable amount of chromosome-painting data with human probes have already been obtained for Afrotheria, no Xenarthra species has been thoroughly analyzed with this approach. We hybridized human chromosome probes to metaphases of species (Dasypus novemcinctus, Tamandua tetradactyla, and Choloepus hoffmanii) representing three of the four Xenarthra families. Our data allowed us to review the current hypotheses for the ancestral Eutherian karyotype, which range from 2n ¼ 44 to 2n ¼ 48. One of the species studied, the two-toed sloth C. hoffmanii (2n ¼ 50), showed a chromosome complement strikingly similar to the proposed 2n ¼ 48 ancestral Eutherian karyotype, strongly reinforcing it. Citation: Svartman M, Stone G, Stanyon R (2006) The ancestral Eutherian karyotype is present in Xenarthra. PLoS Genet 2(7): e109. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0020109 Introduction Megalonychidae (two species of two-toed sloth), and Dasypo- didae (about 20 species of armadillo) [6–9]. According to Extensive molecular data on mammalian genomes have led molecular data estimates, the radiation of Xenarthra recently to the proposal of a new phylogenetic tree for occurred around 65 mya, during the Cretaceous/Tertiary Eutherians, which encompasses four super-orders: Afrotheria boundary.
    [Show full text]