DOCSLIB.ORG

Tuesday, 18 September 2012

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Tuesday, 18 September 2012 Article No. 8509 Available on www.roymorgan.com Roy Morgan New Zealand Electorate Profiles Measuring Public Opinion for over 75 Years Tuesday, 1 September 2020 Labour support drops in August but still maintains huge lead of 19.5% over National In August support for Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern’s Labour Party was at 48%, down 5.5% since July, but well ahead of National on 28.5% (up 2%), with just over a month to go before the rescheduled election in mid-October. If an election were held today Labour could govern with the support of current partners the Greens. Interviewing for this survey in August encompassed the period including the enforcement of Stage 3 restrictions across Auckland following the renewed outbreak of COVID-19 in the city and the decision E to postpone the election by four weeks. E The renewed outbreak of COVID-19 and the re-imposition of restrictions in Auckland and around the country has clearly proved frustrating to many and the subsequent drop in support for Labour in August has narrowed the lead to 19.5% points between the two major parties. Although this is the smallest lead for Labour since March it still represents a huge advantage to Ardern’s Government as it seeks re-election in mid-October. This latest New Zealand Roy Morgan Poll on voting intention was conducted by telephone – both landline and mobile – with a NZ-wide cross-section of 897 electors during August. Of all electors surveyed 5.5% (up 1.5%) didn’t name a party. Electors were asked: “If a New Zealand Election were held today which party would receive your party vote?” Support for the Labour/NZ First/Greens coalition remains strong at 62% in August In August 62% of electors supported the Labour/NZ First/Greens governing coalition, down 1% since July. The governing coalition was well ahead of the Parliamentary opposition National/ Act NZ on only 34.5%, up 1.5% since July. Support for Deputy Prime Minister Winston Peter’s NZ First improved slightly by 1% to 2.5% in August but remains 4.7% below the party’s election result of 7.2% in 2017. The August figure puts NZ First below the party vote threshold; it may be ejected from Parliament altogether at this year’s NZ Election if it garners less than 5% of the vote. FOR IMMEDIATE RELEAS Greens support increased 3.5% to 11.5% in August and is now up 5.2% since the 2017 election FOR IMMEDIATE RELEAS and the party is on track to repeat the result of the 2011 NZ Election when it won 14 seats. Support for Act NZ was at 6% in August, down 0.5% since July. If this level of support is repeated at the election it would be Act’s best election result since 2002 when the party scored over 7% of the vote and won 9 seats in Parliament. A small minority of 3.5% of electors support other minor parties outside Parliament. Of the parties outside Parliament, The Opportunities Party (TOP) was down 0.5% to 1% in August and the Maori Party was unchanged at 0.5%. New Zealand Government Confidence Rating virtually unchanged at 152 in August Roy Morgan Government Confidence Rating was virtually unchanged at a very high 152 in August, down 0.5pts from 152.5 in July. The majority (71%) of New Zealand electors (down 0.5% since July) said New Zealand was ‘heading in the right direction’ compared to only 19% (unchanged) who said New Zealand was ‘heading in the wrong direction’. A.B.N. 91 007 092 944 I Head Office: Tonic House: 386 Flinders Lane, Melbourne Vic 3000 I Telephone: +61 (3) 9629 6888 I www.roymorgan.com The latest monthly ANZ-Roy Morgan Consumer Confidence Rating was down slightly by 4.1pts at 100.2 in August. Both indicators have stabilised in recent months after large movements during the early part of the pandemic in March and April drove Government Confidence to a record high in April while Consumer Confidence Rating hit its lowest level for a decade in the same month at only 84.8. Michele Levine, CEO, Roy Morgan, says several events in August have dented support for Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern’s Labour, but most of this support flowed to coalition partners NZ First and the Greens rather than the opposition: “Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has faced several challenges during August with a renewed outbreak of COVID-19 leading to the re-imposition of a Stage 3 lockdown in New Zealand’s largest city of Auckland and the re-introduction of Stage 2 restrictions throughout the country. “The outbreak prompted the four-week postponement of the New Zealand Election until mid- October and raised questions about whether the elimination strategy pursued so far is a sustainable long-term solution to the threat posed by COVID-19. E “Today’s Roy Morgan New Zealand Poll shows the issues that emerged in August have impacted on support for the governing Labour Party which saw its support decline by 5.5% to 48% - its lowest level of support since March 2020 (42.5%). “However, the good news for Labour is that the support has flowed largely to coalition partners NZ First, up 1% to 2.5% support and the Greens, up 3.5% to 11.5%. This level of support would not be enough to return NZ First to Parliament after the election but would likely lead to a coalition between Labour and the Greens with Prime Minister Ardern staying on in the top job. “The Opposition National under new leader Judith Collins has recovered some ground in August with support growing 2% to 28.5% but is still below the level of support former leader Simon Bridges managed in April (30.5%) before he was dumped as leader in mid-May. “Although the renewed outbreak and lockdowns in August have provided a new challenge for Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern, the quick response appears to have brought the outbreak under control and means Ardern remains heavily favoured to be re-elected with an increased majority at the rescheduled election in mid-October.” For comments or more information about Roy Morgan’s New Zealand Voting Data and profiles of supporters of Labour, National and other parties, please contact: Roy Morgan Enquiries Office: +61 (3) 9224 5309 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEAS [email protected] Margin of Error The margin of error to be allowed for in any estimate depends mainly on the number of interviews on which it is based. The following table gives indications of the likely range within which estimates would be 95% likely to fall, expressed as the number of percentage points above or below the actual estimate. The figures are approximate and for general guidance only, and assume a simple random sample. Allowance for design effects (such as stratification and weighting) should be made as appropriate. Percentage Estimate Sample Size 40%-60% 25% or 75% 10% or 90% 5% or 95% 1,000 ±3.2 ±2.7 ±1.9 ±1.4 1,500 ±2.6 ±2.2 ±1.5 ±1.1 A.B.N. 91 007 092 944 I Head Office: Tonic House: 386 Flinders Lane, Melbourne Vic 3000 I Telephone: +61 (3) 9629 6888 I www.roymorgan.com New Zealand Party Vote: 2020 E Source: Roy Morgan New Zealand Single Source. January – August 2020. Base: New Zealand electors aged 18+. Average interviews per month = 897. New Zealand Party Vote: NZ Govt. v Parliamentary Opposition FOR IMMEDIATE RELEAS Source: Roy Morgan New Zealand Single Source. January – August 2020. Base: New Zealand electors aged 18+. Average interviews per month = 897. A.B.N. 91 007 092 944 I Head Office: Tonic House: 386 Flinders Lane, Melbourne Vic 3000 I Telephone: +61 (3) 9629 6888 I www.roymorgan.com Roy Morgan NZ Government Confidence Rating vs. ANZ-Roy Morgan NZ Consumer Confidence E Source: Roy Morgan New Zealand Single Source. January – August 2020. Base: New Zealand electors aged 18+. Average interviews per month = 897. Voting Intention Summary The following table compares the latest New Zealand Roy Morgan Polls on Voting Intention with the result from the September 23, 2017 General Election: NZ Green PARTY VOTE Labour First Party* National ACT NZ TOP** Maori Party** Other ELECTIONS % % % % % % % % October 12, 1996* 28.19 13.35 10.10 33.87 6.10 n/a n/a 8.39 November 27, 1999 38.74 4.26 5.16 30.50 7.04 n/a n/a 14.30 July 27, 2002 41.26 10.38 7.00 20.93 7.14 n/a n/a 13.29 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEAS September 17, 2005 41.10 5.72 5.30 39.10 1.51 n/a 2.12 5.15 November 8, 2008 33.99 4.07 6.72 44.93 3.65 n/a 2.39 4.25 November 26, 2011 27.48 6.59 11.06 47.31 1.07 n/a 1.43 5.06 September 20, 2014 25.13 8.66 10.70 47.04 0.69 n/a 1.32 6.46 September 23, 2017 36.89 7.20 6.27 44.45 0.50 2.44 1.18 1.07 ROY MORGAN Oct 2-15,POLL 2017 31 6.5 11 46 0.5 2 1.5 1.5 Oct 30-Nov 12, 2017 39.5 5 10 40.5 0.5 2 1.5 1 Nov 27-Dec 10, 2017 37 8 10 40.5 0.5 2.5 0.5 1 2020 January 2020 40 2.5 10.5 40 3 0.5 1.5 2 February 2020 40.5 5 10.5 37 3.5 1.5 1 1 March 2020 42.5 3 11.5 37 3.5 1 0.5 1 April 2020 55 2.5 7 30.5 2.5 0.5 1.5 0.5 May 2020 56.5 2.5 7 26.5 3.5 1 1.5 1.5 June 2020 54.5 1.5 9 27 5 1.5 1 0.5 July 2020 53.5 1.5 8 26.5 6.5 1.5 0.5 2 August 2020 48 2.5 11.5 28.5 6 1 0.5 2 *The 1996 Election was the first New Zealand Election contested via MMP (Mixed Member Proportional).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 1 NEWS Colmar Brunton Poll 22 – 26 May 2021
    1 NEWS Colmar Brunton Poll 22 – 26 May 2021 Attention: Television New Zealand Contact: (04) 913-3000 Release date: 27 May 2021 Level One 46 Sale Street, Auckland CBD PO Box 33690 Takapuna Auckland 0740 Ph: (09) 919-9200 Level 9, Legal House 101 Lambton Quay PO Box 3622, Wellington 6011 Ph: (04) 913-3000 www.colmarbrunton.co.nz Contents Contents .......................................................................................................................................................... 1 Methodology summary ................................................................................................................................... 2 Summary of results .......................................................................................................................................... 3 Key political events ................................................................ .......................................................................... 4 Question order and wording ............................................................................................................................ 5 Party vote ........................................................................................................................................................ 6 Preferred Prime Minister ................................................................................................................................. 8 Public Sector wage freeze .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 1 NEWS Colmar Brunton Poll 9 – 13 March 2021
    1 NEWS Colmar Brunton Poll 9 – 13 March 2021 Attention: Television New Zealand Contact: (04) 913-3000 Release date: 15 March 2021 Level One 46 Sale Street, Auckland CBD PO Box 33690 Takapuna Auckland 0740 Ph: (09) 919-9200 Level 9, Legal House 101 Lambton Quay PO Box 3622, Wellington 6011 Ph: (04) 913-3000 www.colmarbrunton.co.nz Contents Contents .......................................................................................................................................................... 1 Methodology summary ................................................................................................................................... 2 Summary of results .......................................................................................................................................... 3 Key political events ................................................................ .......................................................................... 4 Question order and wording ............................................................................................................................ 5 Party vote ........................................................................................................................................................ 6 Preferred Prime Minister ................................................................................................................................. 8 Economic outlook .........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ministers' Interests 2016-2017
    Cabinet Office Proactive release of information about management of ministerial conflicts of interest 1 October 2016 – 30 September 2017 Explanatory note 1 The table below is a summary of actions taken by Ministers during the period 1 October 2016 to 30 September 2017 in order to manage actual or potential conflicts of interest. It includes transfers of responsibility to other Ministers and standing arrangements not to receive Cabinet papers. Other steps for managing conflicts of interest set out at paragraph 2.74 of the Cabinet Manual (such as declarations of interest, and ad hoc or short term arrangements not to receive papers) are not included. 2 The Office of the Ombudsman has reviewed this summary and confirmed that it is consistent with the more detailed record held by the Cabinet Office. 3 The actions listed in the table are standing arrangements, and may cover multiple instances when responsibility was exercised by another Minister or papers were not received. It is also possible that there have been no such instances, because the particular issue has not arisen in practice. The table only includes new arrangements put in place in the period 1 October 2016 to 30 September 2017, and is not a full summary of all transfers of responsibility and arrangements not to receive papers that have been made or are currently in place. 4 The nature of each actual or potential conflict of interest is described using the following categories: • Pecuniary: relating to a Minister’s personal financial interests such as assets, debts and gifts • Personal: relating to a Minister’s non-financial personal interests, such as family, whānau or close associates, former employment and business activities, and (in certain limited circumstances) current and past involvement with specific organisations • Portfolio: relating to different aspects of a Minister’s official responsibilities • Constituency: relating to a Minister’s role as a member of Parliament.
    [Show full text]
  • National Party Spokesperson Allocations July 2020
    National Party Spokesperson Allocations July 2020 Spokesperson for Hon Judith Collins National Security Leader Hon Gerry Brownlee NZSIS Deputy Leader GCSB Covid-19 Border Response Hon Paul Goldsmith Finance Earthquake Commission Hon Simon Bridges Foreign Affairs Justice Dr Shane Reti Health Hon Todd McClay Economic Development Tourism Chris Bishop Infrastructure Transport Shadow Leader of the House Todd Muller Trade Hon Louise Upston Social Development Social Investment Hon Scott Simpson Environment Climate Change Planning (RMA reform) Hon David Bennett Agriculture Hon Michael Woodhouse Regional Economic Development Pike River re-entry Deputy Shadow Leader of the House Nicola Willis Education Early Childhood Education Hon Jacqui Dean Housing and Urban Development Conservation Hon Mark Mitchell Defence & Disarmament Sport & Recreation Melissa Lee Broadcasting Communications and Digital Media Data and Cyber-security Andrew Bayly Revenue Commerce State-Owned Enterprises Associate Finance Small Business and Manufacturing Hon. Dr Nick Smith State Services Electoral Law Reform Drug Reform Hon Alfred Ngaro Pacific Peoples Community and Voluntary Children and Disability Issues Barbara Kuriger Senior Whip Food Safety Rural Communities Women Harete Hipango Shadow Attorney-General Crown-Maori Relations and Treaty Negotiations Māori Tourism Jonathan Young Energy & Resources Arts Culture and Heritage Hon Tim MacIndoe ACC Skills and Employment Seniors Civil Defence Kanwaljit Singh Bakshi Ethnic Communities Associate Justice Matt Doocey Junior Whip Mental
    [Show full text]
  • Primary Sector Discussion Document
    Primary Sector Discussion Document HAVE YOUR SAY 2019 DISCUSS national.org.nz nznats nznationalparty Printed on 100% recycled paper Contents Introduction from the Leader 2 Introduction from National’s Primary Sector spokesperson 4 Biosecurity and Food Safety 5 Climate Change 8 Education and Workforce 10 Landcorp 12 Research, Science and Innovation 13 Rural Communities 15 Trade 18 Water Storage 20 Key Primary Sectors 21 Dairy 21 Sheep and Beef 22 Forestry 23 Fisheries and Aquaculture 25 Horticulture 26 Racing 28 Questions and feedback 29 2 Primary Sector Introduction from National Party Leader Simon Bridges We’re lucky in New Zealand to have an efficient, basis of this document. This will be the third profitable and productive primary sector as the in our line of discussion documents released backbone of our economy. I know from my time this year after our Environment document and as Minister for Economic Development just how International Affairs document, both of which important the primary sector is to our financial are already receiving great feedback. wellbeing, and that our engine room needs to be looked after for us to prosper as a nation. We realise farmers are worried about what is National is proud to hold all the rural seats in coming down the pipeline from this Government. New Zealand with the exception of one, and is We’ve seen primary sector business confidence committed to supporting our rural communities plummet on the back of this Government’s with sensible, well-informed policy. policies and the uncertainty about what could be around the corner. Employment law reforms, The current Coalition Government didn’t do the climate change and environmental regulations, hard yards when in Opposition and its answer and the transformation of good pastoral to governing appears to be setting up over 260 farmland being swallowed up by the One Billion working groups rather than implementing policy Trees programme.
    [Show full text]
  • Simon Lusk's Plan
    CHAPTER 5 SIMON LUSK’S PLAN Simon Lusk had been watching US Republican politics for years and looking for ideas that were applicable to New Zealand. Gradually he put together a plan to move the country’s politics to the right. He laid this out in conver- sations with his close political allies and in a three-page strategy paper that was never intended to be made public. The plan was practical and methodical. The idea was to target candidate selection processes in safe National seats, installing a rump of hard right candi- dates who would influence politics for many years to come. Suitable candidates could also be found and trained for local government elections. At the same time, a pool of younger people would be identified, cultivated and guided into right-wing politics. Each of these groups would be managed and supported by professional strategy advisers, notably Lusk himself. Such figures were familiar in US politics but not in New Zealand. Lusk was also well aware, from his American observations, that the single greatest advantage of right-wing parties and candidates was their ability to greatly outspend their opponents with support from wealthy and corporate donors. Fundraising was central to the plan. Next, the right could dominate the media by the dominance of right-wing blogs: ‘the right currently controls the blogosphere,’ he wrote, ‘and political journalists repeat much of what appears on blogs.’ The blogs were part of the second track of politics available for ‘black ops’ and nega- tive campaigning. Finally, his plan involved ‘weakening the power of those who believe in big government’, meaning deliberate strategies and tactics to margin- alise anyone, even within the National Party itself, who did not hold hard right views.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Scrutiny of Human Rights in New Zealand (Report)
    PARLIAMENTARY SCRUTINY OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN NEW ZEALAND: GLASS HALF FULL? Prof. Judy McGregor and Prof. Margaret Wilson AUT UNIVERSITY | UNIVERSITY OF WAIKATO RESEARCH FUNDED BY THE NEW ZEALAND LAW FOUNDATION Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 2 Recent Scholarship ..................................................................................................................... 3 Methodology ............................................................................................................................ 22 Select committee controversy ................................................................................................. 28 Rights-infringing legislation. .................................................................................................... 32 Criminal Records (Expungement of Convictions for Historical Homosexual Offences) Bill. ... 45 Domestic Violence-Victims’ Protection Bill ............................................................................. 60 The Electoral (Integrity) Amendment Bill ................................................................................ 75 Parliamentary scrutiny of human rights in New Zealand: Summary report. .......................... 89 1 Introduction This research is a focused project on one aspect of the parliamentary process. It provides a contextualised account of select committees and their scrutiny of human rights with a particular
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4 Extract
    EXTRACT FROM DIRTY POLITICS BY NICKY HAGER. PUBLISHED IN 2014 BY CRAIG POTTON PUBLISHING. CHAPTER 4 THE CRUSHER AND THE ATTACK DOG The attack bloggers’ point of contact in the National government, year after year, remained John Key’s office. But Cameron Slater had another close friend and ally in the government, Cabinet minister Judith Collins. They had much in common. One cultivated the iron woman persona of Crusher Collins, future prime minister, the other the reckless bully-boy persona of Whale Oil, crusading outsider. They were drawn together by right-wing politics and a shared attraction to aggressive and often petty attack politics. Slater was a devoted supporter of Collins, using his blog to promote her and to attack her critics. Collins, in return, fed a continuous supply of material to Slater: public press releases, political gossip, tip-offs and serious leaks. She boast- ed for him in 2013 that ‘you might not like it but Whaleoil is better informed and better read than any other news outlet or social media’.1 They talked often by phone, and in the evenings and weekends they chatted via Facebook. In work hours Collins e-mailed him directly from her sixth-floor Beehive office. Often their exchanges were about small events of the day. The following are typical of Collins’s messages: ‘You should whack these guys hard, they are truly pathetic’;2 ‘Cam, FYI. Another own goal for plughead’, her name for Labour MP Clayton Cosgrove;3 could he edit her Wikipedia page and replace an unflattering photo;4 and, forwarding a document, ‘I think I seri- ously annoyed certain people over it.
    [Show full text]
  • T2015/910: Updated Funding for Kiwirail in Budget 2015
    The Treasury Budget 2015 Information Release Release Document July 2015 www.treasury.govt.nz/publications/informationreleases/budget/2015 Key to sections of the Official Information Act 1982 under which information has been withheld. Certain information in this document has been withheld under one or more of the following sections of the Official Information Act, as applicable: [1] 6(a) - to prevent prejudice to the security or defence of New Zealand or the international relations of the government [2] 6(c) - to prevent prejudice to the maintenance of the law, including the prevention, investigation, and detection of offences, and the right to a fair trial [3] 6(e)(iv) - to damage seriously the economy of New Zealand by disclosing prematurely decisions to change or continue government economic or financial policies relating to the entering into of overseas trade agreements. [4] 9(2)(a) - to protect the privacy of natural persons, including deceased people [5] 9(2)(b)(ii) - to protect the commercial position of the person who supplied the information or who is the subject of the information [6] 9(2)(ba)(i) - to prevent prejudice to the supply of similar information, or information from the same source, and it is in the public interest that such information should continue to be supplied. [6a] 9(2)(ba)(ii) - to protect information, where the making available of the information would be likely otherwise to damage the public interest [7] 9(2)(d) - to avoid prejudice to the substantial economic interests of New Zealand [8] 9(2)(f)(iv) - to
    [Show full text]
  • Do We Need Kiwi Lessons in Biculturalism?
    Do We Need Kiwi Lessons in Biculturalism? Considering the Usefulness of Aotearoa/New Zealand’sPakehā ̄Identity in Re-Articulating Indigenous Settler Relations in Canada DAVID B. MACDONALD University of Guelph Narratives of “métissage” (Saul, 2008), “settler” (Regan, 2010; Barker and Lowman, 2014) “treaty people” (Epp, 2008; Erasmus, 2011) and now a focus on completing the “unfinished business of Confederation” (Roman, 2015) reinforce the view that the government is embarking on a new polit- ical project of Indigenous recognition, inclusion and partnership. Yet recon- ciliation is a contested concept, especially since we are only now dealing with the inter-generational and traumatic legacies of the Indian residential schools, missing and murdered Indigenous women and a long history of (at least) cultural genocide. Further, the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, with its focus on Indigenous self-determi- nation, has yet to be implemented in Canadian law. Canada’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) presented over 94 recommendations and sub-recommendations to consider, outlining a long-term process of cre- ating positive relationships and helping to restore the lands, languages, David MacDonald, Department of Political Science, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph ON, N1G 2W1, email: [email protected] Nga mihi nui, nya: weh,̨ kinana’skomitina’wa’w, miigwech, thank you, to Dana Wensley, Rick Hill, Paulette Regan, Dawnis Kennedy, Malissa Bryan, Sheryl Lightfoot, Kiera Ladner, Pat Case, Malinda Smith, Brian Budd, Moana Jackson, Margaret Mutu, Paul Spoonley, Stephen May, Robert Joseph, Dame Claudia Orange, Chris Finlayson, Makere Stewart Harawira, Hone Harawira, Te Ururoa Flavell, Tā Pita Sharples, Joris De Bres, Sir Anand Satyananand, Phil Goff, Shane Jones, Ashraf Choudhary, Andrew Butcher, Hekia Parata, Judith Collins, Kanwaljit Bakshi, Chris Laidlaw, Rajen Prasad, Graham White, and three anonymous reviewers.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Opposition Team
    LEADER DEPUTY LEADER Judith Collins Shane Reti Andrew Bayly David Bennett Chris Bishop Simon Bridges Gerry Brownlee Simeon Brown Jacqui Dean Papakura List MP Port Waikato List MP List MP Tauranga List MP Pakuranga Waitaki National Security & Intelligence Health Shadow Treasurer (Revenue) Agriculture Covid-19 response Justice • Water Foreign Affairs Police • Corrections Conservation Pacific Peoples • Technology, Children Infrastructure Horticulture Shadow Leader of the House Pike River Re-entry GCSB & NZSIS SFO • Youth Assistant Speaker Manufacturing & Artificial Statistics Biosecurity Māori-Crown Relations Associate Finance Intelligence Matt Doocey Paul Goldsmith Nicola Grigg Barbara Kuriger Melissa Lee Christopher Luxon Todd McClay Ian McKelvie Mark Mitchell Waimakariri List MP Selwyn Taranaki-King Country List MP Botany Rotorua Rangitīkei Whangaparaoa Chief Whip • Mental Health Education Women Energy & Resources Broadcasting & Media Local Government Economic Development Seniors • Forestry Public Service • SOEs Associate Social Associate Trade Rural Communities Digital Economy & Māori Development Small Business • Commerce Racing • Disability Issues Sports & Recreation Development & Employment Associate Arts, Food Safety Communications Associate Transport & Consumer Affairs • Tourism Associate Health Culture & Heritage Associate Transport Ethnic Communities Associate Pacific Peoples Joseph Mooney Todd Muller Simon O’Connor Chris Penk Maureen Pugh Penny Simmonds Scott Simpson Nick Smith Stuart Smith Southland Bay of Plenty Tāmaki Kaipara
    [Show full text]
  • POLITICAL COMMENTARY Reflection on the 2014 Election: Implications for Women
    88 POLITICAL COMMENTARY Reflection on the 2014 election: Implications for women SUE BRADFORD This has not been a good election for women, unless perhaps you’re white, wealthy and suf- ficiently lacking in empathy to believe that John Key and his mates are going to do a good job for us all over the next three years. Whether considering the gender makeup of Parliament and Cabinet, the likely consequences of a National government for women and children over the next few years, or the melancholy fate of the parties of the left, the aspiration of pre-election initiatives like the Women’s Election Agenda appear somewhat dimmed by reality. Parliament A noticeable feature of the 51st Parliament is the reduced number of women elected, down to 37 out of 84, meaning that women make up slightly under 32% of MPs. The 2011 Parliament had 39 women MPs. High hopes that the maturation of MMP and the legacy of the Helen Clark era would mean a steady increase in the numbers of women entering Parliament have clearly not been met. Apart from the Greens, it is hard to identify much success among the major political parties in achieving greater gender balance among their elected representatives. Just 34% of Labour’s MPs are women (11 out of 32), meaning that their goal of reaching 45% women MPs by this election has fallen sadly short. Turning to the makeup of the power holders in National’s third term Cabinet, a pitiful six out of 20 full Ministers are women, with the highest ranked being Paula Bennett at number five.
    [Show full text]