DOCSLIB.ORG

Samuel Beckett's Theatre in America: the Legacy of Alan Schneider As

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Samuel Beckett's Theatre in America: the Legacy of Alan Schneider As The Journal of American Drama and Theatre (JADT) https://jadt.commons.gc.cuny.edu Samuel Beckett’s Theatre in America: The Legacy of Alan Schneider as Beckett’s American Director Samuel Beckett’s Theatre in America: The Legacy of Alan Schneider as Beckett’s American Director. Natka Bianchini. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015; Pp. 204. To discuss the production history of Samuel Beckett’s work in the US is inevitably to begin with Alan Schneider. Schneider directed the American premiere of all twelve of Beckett’s major works, from the Miami opening of Waiting for Godot in 1956 to Catastrophe and What Where in New York in 1983; five of these (Happy Days, Not I, Ohio Impromptu, Rockaby, and What Where) were world premieres. He also directed the aptly titled Film, whose collaboration occasioned Beckett’s only visit to the US. In Samuel Beckett’s Theatre in America, Natka Bianchini examines the growing relationship between Beckett and Schneider, and charts the development of Beckett’s American productions. Bianchini’s introductory chapter makes two crucial points. First, Beckett scholarship, even of his work for the theatre, has concentrated rightly or wrongly on dramatic texts rather than on theatrical productions; this book seeks to balance those scales at least a little. Secondly, for production histories to be any more than cursory, we need more than production reviews. Luckily, both Beckett and Schneider were avid letter-writers, and Bianchini benefited enormously from “Schneider’s inveterate saving of his notebooks, letters, and theatrical ephemera” (8). Indeed, the geographical distance between the two men contributed to more detailed and thoughtful correspondence between them than would have occurred had they been able to communicate more freely and informally. It should come as no surprise that the period from 1956-71, described by Bianchini as one of “resistance to and uncertainty about Beckett’s work” (14), and encompassing the American premieres of Waiting for Godot, Endgame, Krapp’s Last Tape, and Happy Days, should receive three of the five numbered chapters and nearly half of the book’s total text. The first post-introductory chapter draws its title from one of the most misguided promotional campaigns in theatre history: producer Michael Myerberg’s attempt to capitalize on the star quality of Bert Lahr and Tom Ewell by hyping Waiting for Godot as “The Laugh Sensation of Two Continents.” The out-of-town opening at the Coconut Grove in Miami appropriately receives more attention here than does any other collaboration between Beckett and Schneider, despite its failure in virtually every sense of that term. It was the first time the two had worked together, and it was clear that Schneider had attempted to stage the play Beckett wrote, while Lahr saw the play as a star vehicle, and Myerberg was more interested in placating his star than in supporting the authority of his director. The subsequent two chapters, more traditionally titled “Finding a Home Off-Broadway” and “A Series of Firsts,” trace simultaneously the growing if perhaps grudging acceptance by the New York establishment of Beckett as a writer of stature and the burgeoning professional relationship between Beckett and Schneider. Perhaps of particular significance is the 1958 letter from Beckett to Schneider about a change in the “business” of Endgame. Although Schneider had convinced designer David Hays to simplify the set and resisted the producers’ attempts to “gag it up” (50), he did, in the final tableau, burden Clov with skis, a climbing rope, a backpack, and an oar—none of which appear in Beckett’s stage directions. Beckett, hearing of the change, wrote “I’m told Clov carries skis...I think I understand your idea, but I 1 / 2 The Journal of American Drama and Theatre (JADT) https://jadt.commons.gc.cuny.edu feel this is wrong, stylistically...Load him down with as much as you like with shabby banal things...but not skis” (51). One wonders if even such an apparently insignificant departure would have been tolerated in another director. Unfortunately, no correspondence remains from the next few months, so whether Schneider apologized for the change, or whether he removed the skis for the end of the run, is unknown. The next two chapters, “New York and Beyond” and “American Zenith,” discuss both revivals of earlier works and the premieres of Beckett’s later plays, including four world premieres. Beckett was now firmly established to the point of having February 16, 1984 declared “Samuel Beckett Day” in Manhattan in ceremonies attended by not only New York’s mayor Ed Koch but both New York US Senators, Daniel Patrick Moynihan and Alfonse M. D’Amato. By this time, Beckett’s plays were more likely to be produced off-Broadway or outside New York altogether in the burgeoning regional theatre scene, at academic conferences, and on university campuses. The book concludes with an excellent if brief assessment of Schneider’s legacy. Wondering why Schneider is not more highlighted in lists of significant American directors, Bianchini muses that perhaps he was devalued for “slavishly following an author’s text without contributing his own artistic vision” (148). She points out, aptly, that “regardless of the level of detail in Beckett’s stage directions, there is still work to be done in mediating the text” (150). Bianchini ultimately argues that Schneider as a Beckett director should be viewed precisely the way that Billie Whitelaw is perceived as a Beckett actor, as an example of how “interpretation of the author’s text can be both visionary, and, simultaneously, truthful to the author’s intent” (149). One could certainly find fault with some details of this book: a couple of grammatical errors made it into print, some points are merely repeated without expansion, the index could be more comprehensive, and a chronology would be useful. Bianchini sides with Schneider in all disputes except those with Beckett himself, and she accuses those who discount or argue with Schneider of “bias” (7) or even “duplicity” (24). But these are quibbles. This book is a readable, often fascinating work that relies on a host of source material never before brought together: the notes and bibliography total more than a quarter of the book’s length. Samuel Beckett’s Theatre in America will be of enormous assistance to those who wish to better understand either of its central characters, or the American theatre especially in the period from 1956-71, or indeed the relationship between playwright and director in the theatrical process. Richard Jones Stephen F. Austin State University The Journal of American Drama and Theatre Volume 30, Number 2 (Spring 2018) ISNN 2376-4236 ©2018 by Martin E. Segal Theatre Center 2 / 2 Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wordback to CONTENTS P AGE 1 WHA T IS the WORD P an P AN
    WHAT IS THE WORD WHAT PAN PAN PAN BACK TO CONTENTS PAGE 1 WHaT WOrD IS THE WHAT IS THE WORD WHAT PAN PAN PAN BACK TO CONTENTS PAGE 2 COnTEnTS WHAT IS THE WORD WHAT CONTENTS Contents Essay 4 Poems 8 Creatives 13 Creative Biographies 15 Speaker Biographies 20 CONTENTS BACK TO Pan Pan 32 PAGE 3 PAGE WHAT IS THE WORD WHAT Once more, with colour by Nicholas Johnson Speaking from experience, not everyone is overjoyed by an invitation to a poetry performance. It is not a clearly defined event with formal conditions: it could lead to a wide range of possible outcomes and feelings in the listener. The bardic tradition that sweeps across human cultures and histories — from the Homeric ESSAY epics to the Sufis, from the biwa hoshi of Japan to the filí of Ireland — shows both the depth and breadth of the human impulse to hear verse aloud. But in our cosmopolitan present, poetry being “voiced” could run the gamut from adolescent (painful sincerity at an open mic) to adult (earnest readings at university book launches) to transhuman (Black Thought’s ten-minute freestyle). Though poetry always transports us somewhere, the destination could be anywhere in Dante’s universe: infernal, purgatorial, or paradisiacal. This particular poetry performance is, perhaps fittingly for the year 2020, set in that everyday limbo that is the cinema. It is consciously conceived for the large-scale screen — a crucial gesture, when so much life is being lived on small screens — and as a physical, collective experience, with an audience in plush CONTENTS BACK TO seats, bathed in light, feeling the powerful surround-sound system within their bodies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evocation of the Physical, Metaphysical, and Sonic Landscapes in Samuel Beckett's Short Dramatic Works
    Trinity College Trinity College Digital Repository Senior Theses and Projects Student Scholarship Spring 2012 The Evocation of the Physical, Metaphysical, and Sonic Landscapes in Samuel Beckett's Short Dramatic Works Theresa A. Incampo Trinity College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.trincoll.edu/theses Part of the Dramatic Literature, Criticism and Theory Commons, Performance Studies Commons, and the Theatre History Commons Recommended Citation Incampo, Theresa A., "The Evocation of the Physical, Metaphysical, and Sonic Landscapes in Samuel Beckett's Short Dramatic Works". Senior Theses, Trinity College, Hartford, CT 2012. Trinity College Digital Repository, https://digitalrepository.trincoll.edu/theses/209 The Evocation of the Physical, Metaphysical and Sonic Landscapes within the Short Dramatic Works of Samuel Beckett Submitted by Theresa A. Incampo May 4, 2012 Trinity College Department of Theater and Dance Hartford, CT 2 Table of Contents Acknowledgements 5 I: History Time, Space and Sound in Beckett’s short dramatic works 7 A historical analysis of the playwright’s theatrical spaces including the concept of temporality, which is central to the subsequent elements within the physical, metaphysical and sonic landscapes. These landscapes are constructed from physical space, object, light, and sound, so as to create a finite representation of an expansive, infinite world as it is perceived by Beckett’s characters.. II: Theory Phenomenology and the conscious experience of existence 59 The choice to focus on the philosophy of phenomenology centers on the notion that these short dramatic works present the theatrical landscape as the conscious character perceives it to be. The perceptual experience is explained by Maurice Merleau-Ponty as the relationship between the body and the world and the way as to which the self-limited interior space of the mind interacts with the limitless exterior space that surrounds it.
    [Show full text]
  • Waiting for Godot by Samuel Beckett
    PROSCENIUM Waiting For Godot By Samuel Beckett Waiting For Godot For Waiting Wednesday 16th January to Saturday 19th January 2008 Compass Theatre, Ickenham PROSCENIUM Waiting For Godot By Samuel Beckett Waiting For Godot For Waiting Wednesday 16th January to Saturday 19th January 2008 Compass Theatre, Ickenham WAITING FOR GODOT The Author 1906 Born on Good Friday, April 13th, at Foxrock, near Dublin, son of a quantity surveyor. Both parents were Protestants. BY SAMUEL BECKETT 1920-3 Educated at Portora Royal School, Ulster. 1923-7 Trinity College, Dublin. In BA examinations placed first in first class in Modern Literature (French and Italian). Summer 1926: first contact with France, a bicycle tour of the chateaux of the Loire. 1927-8 Taught for two terms at Campbell College, Belfast. CAST: 1928-30 Exchange lecturer in Paris. Meets James Joyce. 1930 First separately published work, a poem Whoroscope. Four terms as assistant lecturer in French, Trinity College, Dublin. Estragon.....................................................................................................Duncan Sykes Helped translate Joyce’s Anna Livia Plurabella into French. 1931 Performance of first dramatic work, Le Kid, a parody sketch Vladimir ................................................................................................ Mark Sutherland after Corneille. Proust, his only major piece of literary criticism, Pozzo .............................................................................................................. Robert Ewen published.
    [Show full text]
  • What Are They Doing There? : William Geoffrey Gehman Lehigh University
    Lehigh University Lehigh Preserve Theses and Dissertations 1989 What are they doing there? : William Geoffrey Gehman Lehigh University Follow this and additional works at: https://preserve.lehigh.edu/etd Part of the English Language and Literature Commons Recommended Citation Gehman, William Geoffrey, "What are they doing there? :" (1989). Theses and Dissertations. 4957. https://preserve.lehigh.edu/etd/4957 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Lehigh Preserve. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Lehigh Preserve. For more information, please contact [email protected]. • ,, WHAT ARE THEY DOING THERE?: ACTING AND ANALYZING SAMUEL BECKETT'S HAPPY DAYS by William Geoffrey Gehman A Thesis Presented to the Graduate Committee of Lehigh University 1n Candidacy for the Degree of Master of Arts 1n English Lehigh University 1988 .. This thesis 1S accepted and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts. (date) I Professor 1n Charge Department Chairman 11 ACD01fLBDGBNKNTS ., Thanks to Elizabeth (Betsy) Fifer, who first suggested Alan Schneider's productions of Samuel Beckett's plays as a thesis topic; and to June and Paul Schlueter for their support and advice. Special thanks to all those interviewed, especially Martha Fehsenfeld, who more than anyone convinced the author of Winnie's lingering presence. 111 TABLB OF CONTBNTS Abstract ...................•.....••..........•.•••••.••.••• 1 ·, Introduction I Living with Beckett's Standards (A) An Overview of Interpreting Winnie Inside the Text ..... 3 (B) The Pros and Cons of Looking for Clues Outside the Script ................................................ 10 (C) The Play in Context ..................................
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction: Intuition/Image/Event: 'Beckett's Peephole' As Audio
    Notes Introduction: Intuition/Image/Event: ‘Beckett’s Peephole’ as Audio- Visual Rhizome 1. The quote is from Beckett’s The Unnamable. 2. Beckett first outlines this concept in his 1932 novel, Dream of Fair to Middling Women, where the character Belacqua desires to write a book whereby ‘The experience of my reader shall be between the phrases, in the silence, communicated by the intervals, not the terms, of the statement.’ Beckett (1992), p. 138. 3. I will discuss this distinction in Chapter 1. 4. See Uhlmann (1999), specifically chapter 2; (2004), pp. 90–106; and (2006). 1 Thinking the Unthinkable: Time, Cinema and the Incommensurable 1. They could thus be said to be more ‘thallic’ than ‘phallic’, horizontally fugitive rather than vertically hierarchical, molecular rather than molar. On the ‘ thallic’, see Weber (1982), pp. 65–83. 2. The Proustian implications of this temporal multiplicity are obvious, although Proust, like Beckett, is less concerned with duration, the past-present’s ability to ‘move on’ as becoming- future, than with the role of memory as a means of destroying the pernicious influence of habit. His distinction between voluntary and involuntary memory is predicated on a desire to preserve lost time as it survives in itself, the better to regain it for ourselves as art. 3. See Bellour (1977), pp. 66–91; (1986), pp. 66–101. 4. The reference to Wim Wender’s Falsche Bewegung (1975) is not uncoincidental. Wenders is paradigmatic of one aspect of the crystal- image in Cinema 2. See pp. 76–8. 5. For Nietzsche’s eternal return as an affirmation of difference, see Deleuze (1983).
    [Show full text]
  • Filmography V6.Indd
    a filmography Foreword by The Irish Film Institute For over 60 years, the Irish Film Institute has been dedicated to the promotion of film culture in Ireland and therefore is proud to present this filmography of Samuel Beckett’s work. Beckett remains one of Ireland’s most important and influential artists and Samuel Beckett – A Filmography provides a snapshot of the worldwide reach and enduring nature of his creativity. As part of the Beckett centenary celebrations held in April 2006, the Irish Film Institute organised a diverse programme of films relating to the work of Beckett, including a tour of the line-up to cinemas around the country. Prior to this, the Irish Film Institute provided the unique opportunity to view all 19 films in the ‘Beckett on Film’ series by screening the entire selection in February 2001. This filmography provides the perfect accompaniment to these previous programmes and it illustrates that Beckett’s work will continue to be adapted for film and television worldwide for years to come. Photograph by Richard Avedon Samuel Beckett – A Filmography was made possible though the kind support of the Department of Arts, Sport and Tourism and the Beckett Centenary Council and Festival Committee. Mark Mulqueen Director, The Irish Film Institute An Introduction Compiling a filmography of Beckett’s work is both a challenging and daunting prospect. It was important, from the outset, to set some parameters for this filmography. Therefore, to this end, I decided to focus on the key area of direct adaptations of Beckett’s work filmed for cinema or television.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Arena Stage: Where American Theater Lives the Mead Center for American Theater
    History oF arena Stage: Where American Theater Lives The Mead Center for American Theater Arena Stage was founded August 16, 1950 in Washington, D.C. by Zelda Fichandler, Tom Fichandler and Edward Mangum. Over 65 years later, Arena Stage at the Mead Center for American Theater, under the leadership of Artistic Director Molly Smith and Executive Director Edgar Dobie, is a national center dedicated to American voices and artists. Arena Stage produces plays of all that is passionate, profound, deep and dangerous in the American spirit, and presents diverse and ground- breaking work from some of the best artists around the country. Arena Stage is committed to commissioning and developing new plays and impacts the lives of over 10,000 students annually through its work in community engagement. Now in its seventh decade, Arena Stage serves a diverse annual audience of more than 300,000. When Zelda and Tom Fichandler and a handful of friends started Arena Stage, there was no regional theater movement in the United States or resources to support a theater committed to providing quality work for its community. It took time for the idea of regional theater to take root, but the Fichandlers, together with the people of the nation’s capital, worked patiently to build the fledgling theater into a diverse, multifaceted, internationally renowned institution. Likewise, there were no professional theaters operating in Washington, D.C. in 1950. Actors’ Equity rules did not permit its members to perform in segregated houses, and neither The National nor Ford’s Theatre was integrated. From its inception, Arena opened its doors to anyone who wished to buy a ticket, becoming the first integrated theater in this city.
    [Show full text]
  • Working on Film and Television Graley Herren Xavier University
    Xavier University Exhibit Faculty Scholarship English 2013 Working on Film and Television Graley Herren Xavier University Follow this and additional works at: http://www.exhibit.xavier.edu/english_faculty Part of the English Language and Literature Commons Recommended Citation Herren, Graley, "Working on Film and Television" (2013). Faculty Scholarship. Paper 8. http://www.exhibit.xavier.edu/english_faculty/8 This Book Chapter/Essay is brought to you for free and open access by the English at Exhibit. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Exhibit. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Working on Film and Television 193 [in German (1981)] and Nacht und Triiume [in German (1983)]; a film CHAPTER 17 adaptation of his srage play Play [Comidie] [in French (1966)]; and a television adaptation of his stage play What Where [Was Wo] [in German Working on Film and Television (1986)]. Impottant critical studies have placed Beckett's screen work firmly within the contexts of their media productions [primarily with the British Graley Herren Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) in England and Siiddeurscher Rundfi.mk (SDR) in West Germany]. Clas Zilliacus initiated this effort with his sem­ inal book Beckett and Broadcasting (1976), and Jonathan Bignell offers the most extensive evaluation of the institutional media contexrs in which the screen work was originally conceived, produced and broadcast in his book As a fledgling writer, Samuel Beckett was himself a critic.' He later Beckett on Screen (2009). Viral as the BBC mntext is to a full appreciation downplayed his criticism to Ruby Cohn as 'mere producrs of friendly obli­ of the teleplays, however, Bignell concedes that these enigmatic experi­ gations or economic necessity', dismissing the lot as 'disjecta' (D, 7 ).
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 TCG National Conference: IDEAS INTO ACTION
    July 29, 2010 For immediate release Contact: Chris Boneau/Susanne Tighe [email protected] 2010 TCG National Conference: IDEAS INTO ACTION Field pioneers meet a new generation of visionaries as TCG awards the “Spirit of Irreverence” to funders and artists alike. The 2010 TCG Award Recipients are: Regional Funder Award: the Joyce Foundation Visionary Leadership Award: Bill Rauch, Artistic Director, Oregon Shakespeare Festival Theatre Practitioner Award: Bernard Gersten, Executive Producer, Lincoln Center Theater National Funder Award: Susan Smith Blackburn Prize Peter Zeisler Memorial Award: Jack Reuler, Artistic Director, Mixed Blood Theatre Alan Schneider Director Award: Anne Kauffman, Director Theatre Communications Group (TCG), the national organization for professional not- for-profit theatre announces the winners of the 2010 TCG Awards for excellence. The TCG Awards, presented during TCG’s National Conference in Chicago this past June, exist to salute extraordinary dedication to the American theatre community, the recipients of this honor are nominated by their peers and selected by TCG’s Board of Directors. Since 2001, TCG’s member theatres have been asked each year to nominate one person or organization for each of the five prestigious awards. On stage at the Palmer House Hilton’s Red Lacquer Room, TCG recognized a Regional Funder, a National Funder and recipients of the Peter Zeisler Memorial Award, the Alan Schneider Director Award and the Visionary Leadership Award with “Spirit of Irreverence” statues designed by Ralph Lee. “It
    [Show full text]
  • Staging Beckett at the Margins Anna Mcmullan and David Pattie
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Central Archive at the University of Reading Introduction: Staging Beckett at the Margins Anna McMullan and David Pattie The Beckett community of scholars and theatre practitioners is a truly global one: for decades, Beckett’s plays have been produced across the world in major metropolitan centres from New York to Tokyo and in regional theatres from Birmingham to Bengal. Individual accounts of those productions have been published in journals1 and edited volumes, and The International Reception of Samuel Beckett (2009) edited by Mark Nixon and Matthew Feldman includes reception histories of Beckett’s theatre in particular cultural contexts, though it has a broader focus on Beckett’s work in general and its shifting cultural and academic reception. Beckett’s own directorial decisions or his collaborations with directors such as Roger Blin or Alan Schneider in Paris, New York, Berlin or London have been documented and analysed.2 This volume turns its attention both to the margins of some of those capital centres, and to lesser known production contexts, such as Romania, Turkey and Korea, for example, which have not been addressed in any detail in Beckett criticism. In several cases, relatively recent productions are discussed here, updating previous accounts of production histories in, for example, Poland or Japan. This special issue of Samuel Beckett Today / Aujourd’hui on ‘Staging Beckett at the Margins’ arose out of a United Kingdom Arts and Humanities
    [Show full text]
  • Lary-Opitz CV -2021
    Lary Opitz E-mail: [email protected] Janet Kinghorn Bernard Theatre, Room 237 (518) 580-5432 Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs, NY 12866 https://academics.skidmore.edu/blogs/laryopitz/ Current and Recent Positions: Professor, Skidmore College Department of Theatre 2001-2021 Artistic Director, Saratoga Shakespeare Company 2012-2019 Chair of the Skidmore College Dept. of Theater (most recent term) 2006-2016 Council Member, Albany Liaison, Actors’ Equity Association 2012-2013 Education: Bachelor of Arts in Theatre and Studio Art, 1970 Queens College, City University of New York The Studio and Forum of Stage Design, New York City Certificate of Distinction awarded 1980 Professional Affiliation: United Scenic Artists, IATSE Local Union #829, NYC Actors Equity Association (Principal Actor) Dramatists Guild Stage Directors and Choreographers Society Shakespeare Theatre Association Literary Managers and Dramagurgs of the Americas Previous Experience in Higher Education: Skidmore College Associate Professor 1989-2001 Assistant Professor 1980-1988 Instructor 1978-1980 Lecturer and Technical Director 1974-1978 Theatre Department Chair 1991-1994 Theatre Department Chair 1988-1989 Director of The Shakespeare Programme (Skidmore College) 1994-2006 Queens College Department of Theatre (CUNY) 1973-1974 Associate Technical Director Columbia University, NYC – Instructor, designer 1970-1972 Teachers College Theatre and Dance, Graduate Departments Lary Opitz CV Page 1 Directing: Julius Caesar (Skidmore Theater) 2018 Love Letters (Saratoga Shakespeare Company)
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 of 562 JEK James and Elizabeth Knowlson Collection This Catalogue Is Based on the Listing of the Collection by James
    University Museums and Special Collections Service JEK James and Elizabeth Knowlson Collection This catalogue is based on the listing of the collection by James and Elizabeth Knowlson 1906-2010 JEK A Research material created by James and Elizabeth Knowlson JEK A/1 Material relating to Samuel Beckett JEK A/1/1 Beckett family material JEK A/1/1/1 Folder of Birth Certificates, Parish registers and Army records Consists of a copy of the Beckett Family tree from Horner Beckett, a rubbing of the plaque on William Beckett’s Swimming Cup, birth certificates of the Roes and the Becketts, including Samuel Beckett, his brother, mother and father and photograph of the Paris Register Tullow Parish Church and research information gathered by Suzanne Pegley Page 1 of 562 University Museums and Special Collections Service James Knowlson note: Detailed information from Suzanne Pegley who researched for James and Elizabeth Knowlson the families of both the Roes – Beckett’s mother was a Roe - and the Becketts in the records of the Church Body Library, St Peter’s Parish, City of Dublin, St Mary’s Church Leixlip, the Memorial Registry of Deeds, etc. Very detailed results. 2 folders 1800s-1990s JEK A/1/1/2 Folder entitled May Beckett’s appointment as a nurse Consists of correspondence James Knowlson note: Inconclusive actually 1 folder 1990s JEK A/1/1/3 Folder entitled Edward Beckett Consists of correspondence James Knowlson note: Beckett’s nephew with much interesting information. 1 folder 1990s-2000s JEK A/1/1/4 Folder entitled Caroline Beckett Murphy Consists
    [Show full text]