Pedigree Chart for Anne Marie Brandeau

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pedigree Chart for Anne Marie Brandeau Pedigree Chart for George H Brandau B: Aug 1862 in columbus, ohio, 2 Anne Marie Brandeau usa Millard Fowlkes M: 15 Dec 1891 in Dyer, Brandeau Tennessee, USA B: 18 Aug 1895 in D: Abt. 1930 in Tennessee, USA Newbern, Dyer, Tennessee M: 22 Nov 1923 D: 01 Jan 1936 in Annie M Fowlkes Memphis, Shelby, B: 27 Jan 1870 in Tennessee, Tennessee, USA USA D: Texas, USA Edward Peter Brandeau B: Pensacola, Florida, USA M: Yes Yes George H Herbers D: B: 09 Dec 1850 in Tennessee, 3 USA Marguerite M: Louise Herbers D: 28 Mar 1909 in Memphis, B: 30 Jun 1896 in Shelby, Tennessee, USA Memphis, Shelby, Tennessee, USA D: 10 Oct 1977 in Memphis, Shelby, Christina Mette Tennessee, USA B: 25 Sep 1851 in Tennessee, 4 USA D: 06 Jan 1908 in Memphis, Shelby, Tennessee, USA Anne Marie Brandeau B: 08 Oct 1956 in New York, New York, USA M: D: 14 Mar 2000 in Hudson, Weld, William Adam Schmitt Colorado, USA B: 11 Oct 1877 in New York, 5 USA Elmer Alfred Schmitt M: 10 Oct 1898 B: 13 Feb 1900 in Utica, Oneida, D: 25 Nov 1931 New York, USA M: 14 Oct 1921 in Bordentown, Burlington, New Jersey, USA D: 09 Jan 1977 in New Hartford, Oneida, New York, USA Emma Gossing B: 16 Nov 1877 in Utica, Oneida, 6 New York, USA D: 22 May 1965 in Rome, Oneida, New York, USA Suzanne Kennedy Schmitt B: Utica, New York, USA D: Dennis E. Kennedy B: Jun 1860 in Oneida, New 7 York, USA Irene Marie Kennedy M: 16 Oct 1890 B: 28 Jun 1894 in Oneida, New D: Jan 1915 in Norwich, York, USA Chenango, New York, USA D: 08 Dec 1948 in Staten Island, Richmond, New York, USA Catherine Ann Sullivan B: 20 Apr 1861 in Florence, 8 Oneida, New York D: May 1904 Page 1 Name: B: M: D: Unknown Brandau B: Prussia M: D: Name: B: D: William Brandau B: 23 Jul 1833 in Rothenburg, Hessen Darmstadt, Germany M: D: 22 Oct 1905 in Clarksville, Tennessee Name: B: M: D: <No name> B: Prussia D: Name: B: D: George H Brandau B: Aug 1862 in columbus, ohio, usa M: 15 Dec 1891 in Dyer, Tennessee, USA D: Abt. 1930 in Tennessee, USA Name: B: M: D: Name: 1 B: M: D: Name: B: D: Anna Martha Miller B: 15 Jan 1841 in Rothenburg, Hessen Darmstadt, Germany D: 31 Dec 1920 in Clarksville, Tennessee Name: B: M: D: Name: B: D: Name: B: D: Page 2 Name: B: M: D: Unknown Herbers B: M: D: Name: B: D: John Dietrich Herbers B: 07 Jul 1815 in Aachen, Germany M: 07 Oct 1851 in Saint Peters Church, Memphis D: 04 Mar 1861 in Memphis, Tennessee, USA Name: B: M: D: Unknown B: D: Name: B: D: George H Herbers B: 09 Dec 1850 in Tennessee, USA M: D: 28 Mar 1909 in Memphis, Shelby, Tennessee, USA Name: B: M: D: Unknown Kettman 1 B: Hannover M: D: Name: B: D: Catharine Kettmann B: 01 May 1828 in Hannover, Germany D: 18 Jun 1876 in Memphis, Tennessee, USA Name: B: M: D: Unknown Mom Kettman B: Hannover D: Name: B: D: Page 3 Name: B: M: D: Unknown Mette B: Abt. 1795 in kingdom of hanover M: D: Name: B: D: Herman Henry Mette B: 05 Sep 1817 in Germany M: Abt. 1844 D: 26 Jan 1874 in Memphis, Name: Tennessee, USA B: M: D: Unknown B: Abt. 1795 in kingdom of hanover D: Name: B: D: Christina Mette B: 25 Sep 1851 in Tennessee, USA M: D: 06 Jan 1908 in Memphis, Shelby, Tennessee, USA Name: B: M: D: Heinrich Goldkamp 1 B: M: 1810 D: Name: B: D: Mary Elizabeth Goldkamp B: 17 Nov 1818 in Germany D: 08 Oct 1911 in Memphis, Tennessee, USA Name: B: M: D: Anna Maria Wilkins B: 05 Nov 1782 D: 01 Feb 1870 Name: B: D: Page 4 Name: B: M: D: Mangang Schmitt B: M: D: Name: B: D: Gosswin Schmitt B: 07 Apr 1848 in Odenheim, Karlsruhe, Baden-Württemberg, Germany M: 03 Jul 1869 D: 15 Feb 1886 John Yocum B: Abt. 1790 in Germany M: D: Germany Sabina Yocum B: 25 Apr 1817 in germany D: Name: B: D: William Adam Schmitt B: 11 Oct 1877 in New York, USA M: 10 Oct 1898 D: 25 Nov 1931 John Yocum B: Abt. 1790 in Germany M: D: Germany Martin Yocum 1 B: Abt. 1810 in Odenheim, Karlsruhe, Baden-Württemberg, Germany M: D: 24 Feb 1890 Name: B: D: Wilhelmina Yocum B: 25 Apr 1848 in Odenheim, Karlsruhe, Baden-Württemberg, Germany D: 09 Nov 1879 Name: B: M: D: Catherine Rechmer B: Oct 1817 in Dieffenbach, Bas- Rhin, Alsace, France D: 08 Apr 1890 Name: B: D: Page 5 Name: B: M: D: Adam Gossing B: stohlplain prussia M: D: driesen prussia Name: B: D: Alfred Adam Gossing B: 24 Jan 1850 in driesen prussia M: 26 Nov 1873 D: Abt. 1942 in Utica, Oneida, New York, USA Name: B: M: D: Catherine Beuder B: D: driesen prussia Name: B: D: Emma Gossing B: 16 Nov 1877 in Utica, Oneida, New York, USA M: 10 Oct 1898 D: 22 May 1965 in Rome, Oneida, New York, USA Name: B: M: D: Gustave Soder B: Abt. 1832 in Bayern, Bavaria 1 M: Utica, Oneida, New York, USA D: 29 Sep 1876 in Utica, Oneida, New York, USA Name: B: D: Mary Soder B: Jul 1854 in New York, USA D: 28 Sep 1932 in Utica, Oneida, New York, USA Name: B: M: D: Barbara Honneger B: Abt. 1834 in Zürich, Switzerland D: Utica, Oneida, New York, USA Name: B: D: Page 6 Name: B: M: D: Michael Kennedy B: M: D: Name: B: D: Michael Kennedy B: 21 Jan 1816 in Tipperary, Ireland, United Kingdom M: D: 08 Oct 1892 in Taberg, Oneida, New York, USA Name: B: M: D: Jane O'Grady B: Abt. 1820 in Limerick, Ireland, United Kingdom D: 05 Feb 1892 in Rome, Oneida, New York, USA Name: B: D: Dennis E. Kennedy B: Jun 1860 in Oneida, New York, USA M: 16 Oct 1890 D: Jan 1915 in Norwich, Chenango, New York, USA Name: B: M: D: Name: 1 B: M: D: Name: B: D: Catherine Hickey B: Abt. 1821 in castle connell, limerick, Ireland D: 05 Feb 1892 in Taberg, Oneida, New York, USA Name: B: M: D: Name: B: D: Name: B: D: Page 7 Name: B: M: D: Name: B: M: D: Name: B: D: Timothy Sullivan B: Abt. 1827 in Ireland, United Kingdom M: D: Name: B: M: D: Name: B: D: Name: B: D: Catherine Ann Sullivan B: 20 Apr 1861 in Florence, Oneida, New York M: 16 Oct 1890 D: May 1904 Name: B: M: D: Name: 1 B: M: D: Name: B: D: Catherine Moriarty B: Abt. 1828 in Ireland, United Kingdom D: Name: B: M: D: Name: B: D: Name: B: D: Page 8.
Recommended publications
  • How Britain Unified Germany: Geography and the Rise of Prussia
    — Early draft. Please do not quote, cite, or redistribute without written permission of the authors. — How Britain Unified Germany: Geography and the Rise of Prussia After 1815∗ Thilo R. Huningy and Nikolaus Wolfz Abstract We analyze the formation oft he German Zollverein as an example how geography can shape institutional change. We show how the redrawing of the European map at the Congress of Vienna—notably Prussia’s control over the Rhineland and Westphalia—affected the incentives for policymakers to cooperate. The new borders were not endogenous. They were at odds with the strategy of Prussia, but followed from Britain’s intervention at Vienna regarding the Polish-Saxon question. For many small German states, the resulting borders changed the trade-off between the benefits from cooperation with Prussia and the costs of losing political control. Based on GIS data on Central Europe for 1818–1854 we estimate a simple model of the incentives to join an existing customs union. The model can explain the sequence of states joining the Prussian Zollverein extremely well. Moreover we run a counterfactual exercise: if Prussia would have succeeded with her strategy to gain the entire Kingdom of Saxony instead of the western provinces, the Zollverein would not have formed. We conclude that geography can shape institutional change. To put it different, as collateral damage to her intervention at Vienna,”’Britain unified Germany”’. JEL Codes: C31, F13, N73 ∗We would like to thank Robert C. Allen, Nicholas Crafts, Theresa Gutberlet, Theocharis N. Grigoriadis, Ulas Karakoc, Daniel Kreßner, Stelios Michalopoulos, Klaus Desmet, Florian Ploeckl, Kevin H.
    [Show full text]
  • The House of Coburg and Queen Victoria: a Study of Duty and Affection
    University of Nebraska at Omaha DigitalCommons@UNO Student Work 6-1-1971 The House of Coburg and Queen Victoria: A study of duty and affection Terrence Shellard University of Nebraska at Omaha Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/studentwork Recommended Citation Shellard, Terrence, "The House of Coburg and Queen Victoria: A study of duty and affection" (1971). Student Work. 413. https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/studentwork/413 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UNO. It has been accepted for inclusion in Student Work by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE HOUSE OF COBURG AND QUEEN VICTORIA A STORY OF DUTY AND AFFECTION A Thesis Presented to the Department of History and the Faculty of the Graduate College University of Nebraska at Omaha In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts by Terrance She Ha r d June Ip71 UMI Number: EP73051 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Diss««4afor. R_bJ .stung UMI EP73051 Published by ProQuest LLC (2015). Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code ProQuest LLC.
    [Show full text]
  • Endogenous Trade Costs and the Formation of a Customs Union
    Endogenous Trade Costs and the Formation of a Customs Union Unpublished manuscript. Do not circulate, quote, or cite, without permission! How Geography Unified Germany: Endogenous Trade Costs and the Formation of a Customs Union∗ y z THILO R. HUNING AND NIKOLAUS WOLF Abstract We analyze the foundation of the German Zollverein as an example how geography can shape institutional change. We show how the redrawing of the European map at the Congress of Vienna 1815—notably Prussia’s control over the Rhineland and Westphalia—affected the incentives for policymakers to cooperate. Our argument comes in three steps. First, we show that the new borders were not endogenous to trade. They were at odds with the strategy of Prussia in 1815, but followed from Britain’s intervention at Vienna regarding the Polish-Saxon question. Second, we develop a theoretical framework, where state planners set tariffs on imports and transits to maximize revenue. We show that in a world with transit tariffs a revenue-maximizing state planner faces a trade-off between benefits from cooperation and the cost of loosing geographical advantage. In a third step we calibrate the model combining historical data on tariffs, freight rates, market sizes with GIS data on lowest costs routes under endogenous tariffs. We then run counterfactuals to show how borders affected incentives: if Prussia would have succeeded with her strategy to gain the entire Kingdom of Saxony instead of the western provinces, the Zollverein would not have formed. We conclude that geography can shape institutional change. To put it differently, as a collateral damage to her intervention at Vienna “Britain unified Germany”.
    [Show full text]
  • The Kingdom of Wurttenmerg and the Making of Germany, 1815-1871
    Te Kingdom of Württemberg and the Making of Germany, 1815-1871. Bodie Alexander Ashton School of History and Politics Discipline of History Te University of Adelaide Submitted for the postgraduate qualification of Doctor of Philosophy (History) May 2014 For Kevin and Ric; and for June, Malcolm and Kristian. Contents Abstract vii Acknowledgements ix List of Abbreviations xi Notes xiii Introduction 15 Chapter 1 35 States and Nation in the Late Eighteenth and Early Nineteenth Century Chapter 2 67 Stuttgart and Vienna before 1848 Chapter 3 93 Te Kingdom of Württemberg and Early Kleindeutschland Chapter 4 123 Independence and South German Particularism, 1815-1848 Chapter 5 159 Te Years of Prophecy and Change, 1848-1849 Chapter 6 181 Counterrevolution, Reaction and Reappraisals, 1850-1859 Chapter 7 207 Six Years of Autumn: 1860-1866 Chapter 8 251 Te Unification of Germany, 1866-1871 Conclusion 295 Bibliography 305 ABSTRACT _ THE TRADITIONAL DISCOURSE of the German unification maintains that it was the German great powers - Austria and Prussia - that controlled German destiny, yet for much of this period Germany was divided into some thirty-eight states, each of which possessed their own institutions and traditions. In explaining the formation of Germany, the orthodox view holds that these so-called Mittel- and Kleinstaaten existed largely at the whim of either Vienna or Berlin, and their policies, in turn, were dictated or shaped by these two power centres. According to this reading of German history, a bipolar sociopolitical structure existed, whereby the Mittelstaaten would declare their allegiances to either the Habsburg or Hohenzollern crowns. Te present work rejects this model of German history, through the use of the case study of the southwestern Kingdom of Württemberg.
    [Show full text]
  • Thüringen Historischer Überblick Englisch
    thüringen Historischer Überblick englisch 02.02.2009 10:40 Uhr Seite 1 THÜRINGEN BLÄTTER ZUR LANDESKUNDE he ‘Land’ Thu- to the formation of a ringia received nation, yet simulta- Tnumerous attri- neously to castigate the butes in view of its cataclysmic fragmen- history, such as “heart- tation: “Our culture land of German cultu- owes Thuringia a lot, re”, “centre of Refor- but our state does not mation”, “home of the owe anything” (Hein- Bach family” and “land rich von Treitschke). of classicism”. The more recent his- The landscape, steep- toriography reversed ed in culture and tra- this verdict as it unco- dition, around the Wart- vered significant politi- burg castle and the cal, social, and econo- town Weimar had not mic forces of innova- been unified territory tion that originated until the 20th century, from Thuringia. but instead a prime ex- Considering the step- ample of German par- by-step unification be- ticularism. This provo- tween 1920 and 1990, ked the historiography Wartburg Eisenach the positive develop- of the 19th century to (Thoma Babovic, ments prevail: the emphasize the cultural Thüringer Tourismus GmbH) princely spirit of re- impulses that derived presentation bestowed from Thuringia leading splendid castles, parks, Thuringia An Historical Overview museums, libraries and theatres in a ny, despite changing views on this mat- unique density upon the “Land of Re- ter. sidencies” and made it synonymous The Mediaeval Empire was gradually with the ‘Land’ of writers and think- weakened for the benefit of the regional ers. Thuringia, however, continues to powers to the point of their de facto be regarded as a leading example of independence after the Thirty Years’ the longlasting, territorial fragmenta- War (1618–48).
    [Show full text]
  • Brother's Keeper 7
    Jun 22 2015 Page 1 1. Living (details excluded). He married Living, (details excluded). Parents 2. Henry William Janssen, b. Feb 09 1918 in DePere, Brown Co, Wisconsin, d. Jul 13 1972 in Neenah, Winnebago Co, Wisconsin, buried in St John Cemetery, Little Chute, Wisconsin (New/8/29S). He married Genevieve Magdalena Jansen, married Nov 26 1938 in St John Nepomucene Church, Little Chute, Wisconsin. Children: 1. i Living (details excluded). He married Living. ii Living (details excluded). He married Living, (details excluded). iii Living (details excluded). He married Karlene Ruth Meulemans, b. Nov 12 1944 in Appleton, Outagamie Co, Wisconsin, d. Dec 04 2014 in Shawano, Shawano Co, Wisconsin, buried in St John Cemetery, Little Chute, Wisconsin (Colbarium/101/45). Karlene R. Janssen, age 70, of Shawano, formerly of Little Chute, passed away on Thursday, December 04, 2014 in Shawano. She was born on November 12, 1944 in Freedom, WI to the late Theodore and Ruth (Appleton) Meulemans. On June 4, 1964 Karlene was united in marriage to Don Janssen at St. Nicholas Church in Freedom. Karlene enjoyed her winters in Texas with her son, daughter-in-law and grandkids. She enjoyed baking and baked everybody's favorite desserts for birthdays and holidays. Karlene loved nothing more than to have sleepovers with her grandchildren. Karlene is survived by: her husband of 50 years, Don Janssen of Shawano; her 4 children, Randy (Beth) Janssen of Little Chute, Debbie (Rick) Nelson of Green Bay, Sarah (Mike) Olmsted of Bear Creek and Troy (Lisa) Janssen of Texas; her grandchildren, Kevin, Allison, Jacob, Katie, Nicholas, Amanda, Morgan, Mallory and Brady; her great grandchildren, Bristol and Devin.
    [Show full text]