DOCSLIB.ORG

Basic Research

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Basic Research Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Basic Research January 2012 Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics Washington, D.C. 20301-3140 This report is a product of the Defense Science Board (DSB). The DSB is a Federal Advisory Committee established to provide independent advice to the Secretary of Defense. Statements, opinions, conclusions, and recommendations in this report do not necessarily represent the official position of the Department of Defense (DOD). The DSB Task Force on Basic Research completed its information gathering in April 2011. The report was cleared for open publication by the DOD Office of Security Review on December 7, 2011. This report is unclassified and cleared for public release. OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 3140 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20301 - 3140 DEFENSE SCIENCE BOARD MEMORANDUM FOR UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR ACQUISITION, TECHNOLOGY, AND LOGISTICS SUBJECT: Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Basic Research I am pleased to forward the final report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on Basic Research. The report offers important considerations for the Department of Defense to maintain a world-dominating lead in basic research. Beginning with efTorts supporting World War II, the United States built a commanding scientific infrastructure second to none, and reaped considerable military and economic benefits as a result. The task force took on the task to both validate the quality of the existing DoD basic research program and to provide advice on long-term basic research planning and strategies. Overall, the task force found the current DoD basic research program to be a very good one, comparable to other basic research programs in the government and well-suited to DoD needs. The managers are highly qualified, reviews are plentiful, and coordination is excellent. As is true for most programs in the DoD, however, less bureaucracy and more transparency would be welcome improvements. In the area of long-term basic research planning and strategies, the task force investigated four topic areas, making recommendations for actions in each of them: • A more concerted enort is needed to ensure that the U.S. scientific human resources needed by the Department for global military competition will be available, and not assume that it will be so without such determined effort. • An increasing fraction of the world's basic research is being- conducted outside the United States- as part of a larger trend toward the globalization of science. In order to avoid technological surprise, it is important for DoD to be involved in the cutting edge of basic research on topics of specific interest to the Department-whether the cutting edge is in the U.S. or overseas. • A technology strategy is needed that contains objectives expressed with clarity, quantification, priority, and timing. A genuine technology strategy would not only be invaluable in alignment of basic research, but also in alignment of systems, missions, and national security affairs more broadl y. • While basic research was not identified as a barrier to a healthy innovation ecology in 000, several factors related to the current defense acquisition system were found to limit innovation in major 000 systems. 000 can dominate the world's military organizations in being able to use basic research results to create new and enhanced military capabilities, by dint of financial resources, infrastructure, and national culture. The task force offers their recommendations that will ensure this continues for decades to come. For these reasons, I endorse all of the study'S recommendations and encourage you to adopt them into the operations of the Office of Acquisition, Technology and Logistics. <7~A ~,.~~,,,Jt · Dr. Paul Kaminski Chairman OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 3140 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20301-3140 DEFENSE SCIENCE BOARD MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, DEFENSE SCIENCE BOARD SUBJECT: FINAL REPORT OF THE DEFENSE SCIENCE BOARD TASK FORCE ON BASIC RESEARCH The Department of Defense funds basic research in a wide variety of scientific and engineering fields with a goal of exploiting new knowledge to enhance-and where possible, transform-future capabilities. DoD-funded research is known for high- risk endeavors that have led to paradigm shifts in the nation's technical capabilities. The task force took on the task to both validate the quality of the existing 000 basic research program and to provide advice on long-term basic research planning and strategies. Overall, the task force found the current 000 basic research program to be a very good one, comparable to other basic research programs in the government and well-suited to 000 needs. The managers are highly qualified, reviews are plentiful, and coordination is excellent. As is true for most programs in the 000, however, less bureaucracy and more transparency would be welcome improvements. In the area of long-tenn basic research plarll1ing and strategies, the task force investigated four topic areas, making recommendations for actions in each of them: • A more concerted effort is needed to ensure that the U.S. scientific human resources needed by the Department for global military competition will be available, and not assume that it will be so without such determined effort. • An increasing fraction of the world's basic research is being conducted outside the United States as part of a larger trend toward the globalization of science. In order to avoid technological surprise, it is important for 000 to be involved in the cutting edge of basic research on topics of specifi c interest to the Department- whether the cutting edge is in the U.S. or overseas. • A technology strategy is needed that contains objectives expressed with clarity, quantification, priority, and timing. A genuine technology strategy would not only be invaluable in alignment of basic research, but also in alignment of systems, missions, and national security affairs more broadly. • While basic research was not identified as a ban·ier to a healthy innovation ecology in 000, several factors related to the current defense acquisition system were found to limit innovation in major 000 systems . Taken together, the issues addressed in the study point to the important role of basic research in the continuing success of the DoD mission. DoD dominates the world's military organizations in being able to use basic research results to create new and enhanced military capabilities, by dint of fmancial resources, infrastructure, and national culture. The task force offers their recommendations that will ensure this trend continues for decades to come. Dr Craig Fields Dr Lydia Thomas Co-Chair Co-Chair TABLE OF CONTENTS I v Table of Contents . S .. E xecunve ummary .•...••.•••.••...•.•••........•..••......••..•...•••..••.....•.•..•..•....•.••....•.•....••• VII Introduction ........••...........................•...................................................•.•.•..•.•••...•.. 1 Part I. The Current DOD Basic Research Program Chapter 1. Overview of Defense Basic Research ............................................ 7 Rationale for DOD Investtnent in Basic Research ..................................................................................... 8 Defense Basic Research Funding and Trends ............................................................................................ 12 Basic Research Organizations ......................................................................................................................... 15 Previous Assessments of Defense Basic Research ................................................................................... 20 Chapter 2. Assessment of the Current DOD Basic Research Program ... 25 Ensuring Quality of Basic Research Projects, Programs, and People ................................................ 25 Coordinating Among DC)D Basic Research Programs .......................................................................... 29 Coordinating Among Federal Basic Research Programs ........................................................................ 30 Efficiency of DOD Funding ........................................................................................................................... 31 Summary ................................................................................................................................................................ 36 Part II. Human Resources and Globalization of Science Chapter 3. Human Resources ........................................................................... 39 People are Key for Creating and Preventing Surprise ............................................................................. 39 Inspiring Excellent Researchers to Address DOD Problems ............................................................... 42 Strengthening the Technical Talent of U.S. Citizens ............................................................................... 46 DOD Laboratory Personnel ............................................................................................................................ 50 i\-Ianaging the Basic Research Portfolio........................................................................................................ 53 Chapter 4. Globalization of Basic Research .................................................. 56 Implications for the Departtnent of Defense ............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Science Serving the Nation, Impact of Basic Research
    Science Serving the Nation The Impact of Basic Research Basic Energy Sciences Science Serving the Nation The Impact of Basic Research Basic Energy Sciences BASIC ENERGY SCIENCES ENERGY ENVIRONMENT SECURITY MATERIALS SCIENCES ENGINEERING CHEMICAL GEOSCIENCES BIOSCIENCES RESEARCH UNDERSTAND PREDICT CONTROL MATTER ENERGY This document highlights the breadth of the scientific programs and the impact of this research in commerce and in advancing scientific frontiers. To look in more detail at our research portfolio and see how we manage our programs, consult our BES 2011 Summary Report, available at http://science.energy.gov/~/media/bes/pdf/reports/files/bes2011sr_rpt.pdf. Additional information about the impact of BES research can be found on our website at http://science.energy.gov/bes/. New highlights showcasing the benefits of BES programs are frequently posted to the web as they arise. Our user facility brochure (http://science.energy.gov/~/media/bes/suf/pdf/BES_Facilities.pdf) contains additional information on all of the BES national scientific user facilities. Energy technologies, environmental tech- nologies, and national security all depend on the progress of basic science research. By understanding, predicting, and ulti- mately controlling matter and energy at the level of electrons, atoms, and molecules, scientists have the capacity to transform the technologies we use in everyday life. From Fundamental Science to Energy Technology Basic Energy Sciences (BES) supports the science that is the foundation for new technologies essential to the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) missions in energy, environment, and national security. We are one of the Nation’s leading sponsors of fundamental research across broad areas of materials sciences and engineering, chemical sciences, geosciences, and biosciences.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring Science: Is There “Basic Research” Without Statistics? Benoît Godin 3465, Rue Durocher Montréal (QUE) Canada
    Measuring Science: Is There “Basic Research” Without Statistics? Benoît Godin 3465, rue Durocher Montréal (QUE) Canada H2X 2C6 Project on the History and Sociology of S&T Statistics Paper No. 3 2000 Previous papers in the series: 1. B. Godin, Outlines for a History of Science Measurement. 2. B. Godin, The Measure of Science and the Construction of a Statistical Territory: The Case of the National Capital Region (NCR). 1 Measuring Science : Is There “Basic Research” Without Statistics? Measuring Science: Is There “Basic Research” Without Statistics? Fundamental research is a central category of science policy and science measurement. Of all the concepts defined in the first edition of the Frascati manual, the OECD (Organization for Economic and Co-operation Development) methodological guide for official surveys on R&D, the first dealt with fundamental research. While a definition of research itself did not appear until the second edition in 1970, fundamental research was defined explicitly as follows: Work undertaken primarily for the advancement of scientific knowledge, without a specific practical application in view. 1 In the last edition of the manual (1994), the definition is substantially the same as the one in 1963, although the term “basic” is now used instead of fundamental: Basic research is experimental or theoretical work undertaken primarily to acquire new knowledge of the underlying foundation of phenomena and observable facts, without any particular application or use in view. 2 Between 1963 and 1994, therefore, all five editions of the manual carry essentially the same definition without any significant changes: basic research is research concerned with knowledge as contrasted with applied research, which is concerned with the application of knowledge.
    [Show full text]
  • Concepts and Definitions for Identifying R&D
    Frascati Manual 2015 Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development © OECD 2015 Chapter 2 Concepts and definitions for identifying R&D This chapter provides the definition of research and experimental development (R&D) and of its components, basic research, applied research and experimental development. These definitions are essentially unchanged from those in previous editions of the manual. Where there are differences, they reflect changes in culture and the use of language. To provide guidance on what is and what is not an R&D activity, five criteria are provided which require the activity to be novel, creative, uncertain in it outcome, systematic and transferable and/or reproducible. Since the last edition, the treatment of R&D expenditure in the System of National Accounts (SNA) has changed from an expense to a capital investment. As a result, the language of this manual, and of the SNA, is closer and there are additional requirements for measurements of financial flows. While the manual has always applied to all scientific disciplines, there is more emphasis on the social sciences, humanities and the arts, in addition to the natural sciences and engineering. Measuring R&D activities through surveys, administrative data, or interviews raises questions about boundaries and what is and what is not included and this chapter provides examples to help answer those questions. The manual is used to interpret R&D data as part of policy development and evaluation, but the focus of this chapter is on definitions for measurement purposes. 43 I-2. CONCEPTS AND DEFINITIONS FOR IDENTIFYING R&D 2.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Science for Energy Technology: Strengthening the Link Between Basic Research and Industry
    ďŽƵƚƚŚĞĞƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚŽĨŶĞƌŐLJ͛ƐĂƐŝĐŶĞƌŐLJ^ĐŝĞŶĐĞƐWƌŽŐƌĂŵ ĂƐŝĐŶĞƌŐLJ^ĐŝĞŶĐĞƐ;^ͿƐƵƉƉŽƌƚƐĨƵŶĚĂŵĞŶƚĂůƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚƚŽƵŶĚĞƌƐƚĂŶĚ͕ƉƌĞĚŝĐƚ͕ĂŶĚƵůƟŵĂƚĞůLJĐŽŶƚƌŽů ŵĂƩĞƌĂŶĚĞŶĞƌŐLJĂƚƚŚĞĞůĞĐƚƌŽŶŝĐ͕ĂƚŽŵŝĐ͕ĂŶĚŵŽůĞĐƵůĂƌůĞǀĞůƐ͘dŚŝƐƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƐƚŚĞĨŽƵŶĚĂƟŽŶƐ ĨŽƌŶĞǁĞŶĞƌŐLJƚĞĐŚŶŽůŽŐŝĞƐĂŶĚƐƵƉƉŽƌƚƐKŵŝƐƐŝŽŶƐŝŶĞŶĞƌŐLJ͕ĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚ͕ĂŶĚŶĂƟŽŶĂůƐĞĐƵƌŝƚLJ͘dŚĞ ^ƉƌŽŐƌĂŵĂůƐŽƉůĂŶƐ͕ĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚƐ͕ĂŶĚŽƉĞƌĂƚĞƐŵĂũŽƌƐĐŝĞŶƟĮĐƵƐĞƌĨĂĐŝůŝƟĞƐƚŽƐĞƌǀĞƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚĞƌƐĨƌŽŵ ƵŶŝǀĞƌƐŝƟĞƐ͕ŶĂƟŽŶĂůůĂďŽƌĂƚŽƌŝĞƐ͕ĂŶĚƉƌŝǀĂƚĞŝŶƐƟƚƵƟŽŶƐ͘ ďŽƵƚƚŚĞ͞ĂƐŝĐZĞƐĞĂƌĐŚEĞĞĚƐ͟ZĞƉŽƌƚ^ĞƌŝĞƐ KǀĞƌƚŚĞƉĂƐƚĞŝŐŚƚLJĞĂƌƐ͕ƚŚĞĂƐŝĐŶĞƌŐLJ^ĐŝĞŶĐĞƐĚǀŝƐŽƌLJŽŵŵŝƩĞĞ;^ͿĂŶĚ^ŚĂǀĞĞŶŐĂŐĞĚ ƚŚŽƵƐĂŶĚƐŽĨƐĐŝĞŶƟƐƚƐĨƌŽŵĂĐĂĚĞŵŝĂ͕ŶĂƟŽŶĂůůĂďŽƌĂƚŽƌŝĞƐ͕ĂŶĚŝŶĚƵƐƚƌLJĨƌŽŵĂƌŽƵŶĚƚŚĞǁŽƌůĚƚŽƐƚƵĚLJ ƚŚĞĐƵƌƌĞŶƚƐƚĂƚƵƐ͕ůŝŵŝƟŶŐĨĂĐƚŽƌƐ͕ĂŶĚƐƉĞĐŝĮĐĨƵŶĚĂŵĞŶƚĂůƐĐŝĞŶƟĮĐďŽƩůĞŶĞĐŬƐďůŽĐŬŝŶŐƚŚĞǁŝĚĞƐƉƌĞĂĚ ŝŵƉůĞŵĞŶƚĂƟŽŶŽĨĂůƚĞƌŶĂƚĞĞŶĞƌŐLJƚĞĐŚŶŽůŽŐŝĞƐ͘dŚĞƌĞƉŽƌƚƐĨƌŽŵƚŚĞĨŽƵŶĚĂƟŽŶĂůĂƐŝĐZĞƐĞĂƌĐŚEĞĞĚƐƚŽ ƐƐƵƌĞĂ^ĞĐƵƌĞŶĞƌŐLJ&ƵƚƵƌĞǁŽƌŬƐŚŽƉ͕ƚŚĞĨŽůůŽǁŝŶŐƚĞŶ͞ĂƐŝĐZĞƐĞĂƌĐŚEĞĞĚƐ͟ǁŽƌŬƐŚŽƉƐ͕ƚŚĞƉĂŶĞůŽŶ 'ƌĂŶĚŚĂůůĞŶŐĞƐĐŝĞŶĐĞ͕ĂŶĚƚŚĞƐƵŵŵĂƌLJƌĞƉŽƌƚEĞǁ^ĐŝĞŶĐĞĨŽƌĂ^ĞĐƵƌĞĂŶĚ^ƵƐƚĂŝŶĂďůĞŶĞƌŐLJ&ƵƚƵƌĞ ĚĞƚĂŝůƚŚĞŬĞLJďĂƐŝĐƌĞƐĞĂƌĐŚŶĞĞĚĞĚƚŽĐƌĞĂƚĞƐƵƐƚĂŝŶĂďůĞ͕ůŽǁĐĂƌďŽŶĞŶĞƌŐLJƚĞĐŚŶŽůŽŐŝĞƐŽĨƚŚĞĨƵƚƵƌĞ͘dŚĞƐĞ ƌĞƉŽƌƚƐŚĂǀĞďĞĐŽŵĞƐƚĂŶĚĂƌĚƌĞĨĞƌĞŶĐĞƐŝŶƚŚĞƐĐŝĞŶƟĮĐĐŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJĂŶĚŚĂǀĞŚĞůƉĞĚƐŚĂƉĞƚŚĞƐƚƌĂƚĞŐŝĐ ĚŝƌĞĐƟŽŶƐŽĨƚŚĞ^ͲĨƵŶĚĞĚƉƌŽŐƌĂŵƐ͘;ŚƩƉ͗ͬͬǁǁǁ͘ƐĐ͘ĚŽĞ͘ŐŽǀͬďĞƐͬƌĞƉŽƌƚƐͬůŝƐƚ͘ŚƚŵůͿ ϭ ^ĐŝĞŶĐĞĨŽƌŶĞƌŐLJdĞĐŚŶŽůŽŐLJ͗^ƚƌĞŶŐƚŚĞŶŝŶŐƚŚĞ>ŝŶŬďĞƚǁĞĞŶĂƐŝĐZĞƐĞĂƌĐŚĂŶĚ/ŶĚƵƐƚƌLJ Ϯ EĞǁ^ĐŝĞŶĐĞĨŽƌĂ^ĞĐƵƌĞĂŶĚ^ƵƐƚĂŝŶĂďůĞŶĞƌŐLJ&ƵƚƵƌĞ ϯ ŝƌĞĐƟŶŐDĂƩĞƌĂŶĚŶĞƌŐLJ͗&ŝǀĞŚĂůůĞŶŐĞƐĨŽƌ^ĐŝĞŶĐĞĂŶĚƚŚĞ/ŵĂŐŝŶĂƟŽŶ ϰ ĂƐŝĐZĞƐĞĂƌĐŚEĞĞĚƐĨŽƌDĂƚĞƌŝĂůƐƵŶĚĞƌdžƚƌĞŵĞŶǀŝƌŽŶŵĞŶƚƐ ϱ ĂƐŝĐZĞƐĞĂƌĐŚEĞĞĚƐ͗ĂƚĂůLJƐŝƐĨŽƌŶĞƌŐLJ
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Philosophy of Science
    INTRODUCTION TO PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE The aim of philosophy of science is to understand what scientists did and how they did it, where history of science shows that they performed basic research very well. Therefore to achieve this aim, philosophers look back to the great achievements in the evolution of modern science that started with the Copernicus with greater emphasis given to more recent accomplishments. The earliest philosophy of science in the last two hundred years is Romanticism, which started as a humanities discipline and was later adapted to science as a humanities specialty. The Romantics view the aim of science as interpretative understanding, which is a mentalistic ontology acquired by introspection. They call language containing this ontology “theory”. The most successful science sharing in the humanities aim is economics, but since the development of econometrics that enables forecasting and policy, the humanities aim is mixed with the natural science aim of prediction and control. Often, however, econometricians have found that successful forecasting by econometric models must be purchased at the price of rejecting equation specifications based on the interpretative understanding supplied by neoclassical macroeconomic and microeconomic theory. In this context the term “economic theory” means precisely such neoclassical equation specifications. Aside from economics Romanticism has little relevance to the great accomplishments in the history of science, because its concept of the aim of science has severed it from the benefits of the examination of the history of science. The Romantic philosophy of social science is still resolutely practiced in immature sciences such as sociology, where mentalistic description prevails, where quantification and prediction are seldom attempted, and where implementation in social policy is seldom effective and often counterproductive.
    [Show full text]
  • Advances in Atomtronics
    entropy Review Advances in Atomtronics Ron A. Pepino Department of Chemistry, Biochemistry and Physics Florida Southern College, Lakeland, FL 33801, USA; rpepino@flsouthern.edu Abstract: Atomtronics is a relatively new subfield of atomic physics that aims to realize the device behavior of electronic components in ultracold atom-optical systems. The fact that these systems are coherent makes them particularly interesting since, in addition to current, one can impart quantum states onto the current carriers themselves or perhaps perform quantum computational operations on them. After reviewing the fundamental ideas of this subfield, we report on the theoretical and experimental progress made towards developing externally-driven and closed loop devices. The functionality and potential applications for these atom analogs to electronic and spintronic systems is also discussed. Keywords: atomtronics; open quantum systems; Bose–Einstein condensates; quantum simulation; quantum sensing PACS: 01.30.Rr; 03.65.Yz; 03.67.-a; 03.75.Kk; 03.75.Lm; 05.70.Ln; 06.20.-f 1. Introduction Quantum simulation has become a major research effort in atomic physics over the last three decades. Bose–Einstein condensates (BECs) have been generated, trapped, and manipulated in countless experiments, and the introduction of optical lattices has allowed Citation: Pepino, R.A. Advances in for the experimental realization of condensed matter phenomena such as the Mott insular Atomtronics. Entropy 2021, 23, 534. to superfluid phase transition and the Hofstadter butterfly [1,2]. As optical techniques https://doi.org/10.3390/e23050534 have improved, it has become possible to produce not only honeycomb [3] and Kagomé lattices [4], but custom optical lattices using holographic masks [5].
    [Show full text]
  • Atomtronics-Enabled Quantum Technologies 2
    Focus on Atomtronics-enabled Quantum Technologies Luigi Amico 1,2 Gerhard Birkl 3, Malcolm Boshier 4, and Leong-Chuan Kwek, 2,5 1 Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, Universit`adi Catania & CNR-MATIS-IMM & INFN-Laboratori Nazionali del Sud, INFN, Catania 2 Centre for Quantum Technologies, National University of Singapore 3 Technische Universit¨at Darmstadt 4 Los Alamos National Laboratories 5 Institute of Advanced Studies and National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore February 2014 Abstract. Atomtronics is an emerging field in quantum technology that promises to realize ’atomic circuit’ architectures exploiting ultra-cold atoms manipulated in versatile micro-optical circuits generated by laser fields of different shapes and intensities or micro-magnetic circuits known as atom chips. Although devising new applications for computation and information transfer is a defining goal of the field, Atomtronics wants to enlarge the scope of quantum simulators and to access new physical regimes with novel fundamental science. With this focus issue we want to survey the state of the art of Atomtronics-enabled Quantum Technology. We collect articles on both conceptual and applicative aspects of the field for diverse exploitations, both to extend the scope of the existing atom-based quantum devices and to devise platforms for new routes to quantum technology. arXiv:1612.07783v1 [quant-ph] 22 Dec 2016 1. Introduction The pervasive importance of electronic devices, e.g. transistors, diodes, capacitors, inductors, integrated circuits, can be observed everywhere in our daily applications and usage. The key players in electronic devices are electrons and holes. Imagine circuitry in which the carriers are atoms instead of electrons and holes.
    [Show full text]
  • Program Schedule
    PROGRAM SCHEDULE FRIDAY, MAY 28, 2010 12:15 – 1:45 pm A01 A REPORT OF THE FIRST RSA CAREER RETREAT Co-Chairs: Cheryl Geisler, Simon Fraser University; Michael Halloran, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; Krista Ratcliffe, Marquette University Participants: Jen Bacon, West Chester University; Suzanne Bordelon, San Diego State University; Elizabeth Britt, Northeastern University; Leah Ceccarelli, University of Washington; Martha Cheng, Rollins College; Janice Chernekoff, Kutztown University; Arabella Lyon, SUNY-Buffalo; Carole Clark Papper, Hofstra University; Barbara Schneider, University of Toledo; Christine Tully, University of Wisconsin, Madison; Liz Wright, Rivier College A02 BARACK OBAMA: THE RHETORIC OF A POSTMODERN PRESIDENT Chair: Connie Johnson, University of Texas at Austin A Tale of Two Cities: Obama at Howard and at South New Hampshire Sheena Howard, Howard University Cultural Memory and Productive Forgetting in Obama’s A More Perfect Union Speech G. Mitchell Reyes, Lewis and Clark College A More Perfect Union: A Critical Analysis of Obama’s "Race" Speech Matt Morris, University of Texas at Austin Barack Obama’s Heroic Whiteness: Invoking the Founding Fathers to Win the Presidency Connie Johnson, University of Texas at Austin Respondent : Barry Brummett, University of Texas at Austin A03 RHETORIC OF SCIENCE Chair: Virginia Anderson, Indiana University Southeast Raising Moral Questions through Science: Silent Spring’s Use of Narrative, Time, and Space Jessica Prody, University of Minnesota Evolving Concordance: An Aristotelian
    [Show full text]
  • Foundations of Scientific Research
    2012 FOUNDATIONS OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH N. M. Glazunov National Aviation University 25.11.2012 CONTENTS Preface………………………………………………….…………………….….…3 Introduction……………………………………………….…..........................……4 1. General notions about scientific research (SR)……………….……….....……..6 1.1. Scientific method……………………………….………..……..……9 1.2. Basic research…………………………………………...……….…10 1.3. Information supply of scientific research……………..….………..12 2. Ontologies and upper ontologies……………………………….…..…….…….16 2.1. Concepts of Foundations of Research Activities 2.2. Ontology components 2.3. Ontology for the visualization of a lecture 3. Ontologies of object domains………………………………..………………..19 3.1. Elements of the ontology of spaces and symmetries 3.1.1. Concepts of electrodynamics and classical gauge theory 4. Examples of Research Activity………………….……………………………….21 4.1. Scientific activity in arithmetics, informatics and discrete mathematics 4.2. Algebra of logic and functions of the algebra of logic 4.3. Function of the algebra of logic 5. Some Notions of the Theory of Finite and Discrete Sets…………………………25 6. Algebraic Operations and Algebraic Structures……………………….………….26 7. Elements of the Theory of Graphs and Nets…………………………… 42 8. Scientific activity on the example “Information and its investigation”……….55 9. Scientific research in Artificial Intelligence……………………………………..59 10. Compilers and compilation…………………….......................................……69 11. Objective, Concepts and History of Computer security…….………………..93 12. Methodological and categorical apparatus of scientific research……………114 13. Methodology and methods of scientific research…………………………….116 13.1. Methods of theoretical level of research 13.1.1. Induction 13.1.2. Deduction 13.2. Methods of empirical level of research 14. Scientific idea and significance of scientific research………………………..119 15. Forms of scientific knowledge organization and principles of SR………….121 1 15.1. Forms of scientific knowledge 15.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Mini-Newsletter January 2012 AAAS Section on Industrial Science and Technology (Section P)
    Mini-Newsletter January 2012 AAAS Section on Industrial Science and Technology (Section P) 2012 Industrial Science and Technology Business Meeting Schedule– Please Join Us!!! Open to all meeting registrants - Come join us! Saturday, February 18, 2012: 10:00 AM-12:00 PM Oceanview Suite 3 (Pan Pacific Hotel) We hope to see you at the annual business meeting of the AAAS Section on Industrial Science and Technology that will take place Saturday morning, February 18, 2012 from 10:00 to noon in the Oceanview Suite 3 (Pan Pacific Hotel) during the AAAS Annual Meeting in Vancouver, B.C. Section Chair Carol Burns will lead the meeting. All are welcome to attend! We will provide coffee and tea service, fruit and assorted gourmet pastries at the business meeting. Minimizing our food costs allows our section to help subsidize the travel costs of speakers invited to participate in Section-P sponsored symposia. For those unable to attend the meeting, please be sure to share your ideas for next year’s technical symposia and/or topical lectures that Section P might propose/sponsor/cosponsor at the 2013 AAAS annual meeting (to be held in Boston) in advance of the February 18, 2012 business meeting. You are, of course, welcome to share your ideas and input anytime, which can be submitted to Section Secretary Anice Anderson at [email protected], or any of the other section officers listed below. We will also discuss Fellows Nominations for next year, so let us know your suggestions! Also, President of the AAAS Caribbean Division, Jorge Colón will talk to us about Haiti.
    [Show full text]
  • Universidade De São Paulo - SIICUSP: Engenharias E Exatas (15., São Carlos), 2007
    AAAppprrreeessseeennntttaaaçççãããooo PPPrrroooddduuuçççãããooo CCCiiieeennntttííífffiiicccaaa 222000000777 Sumário ARTIGO DE JORNAL-DEP/ENTR - NACIONAL.................................................................................. 13 ARTIGO DE PERIÓDICO - INTERNACIONAL..................................................................................... 13 ARTIGO DE PERIÓDICO - NACIONAL................................................................................................ 25 ARTIGO DE PERIÓDICO-DEP/ENTR - NACIONAL ............................................................................ 25 EDITOR DE PERIÓDICO - INTERNACIONAL ..................................................................................... 26 PARTE DE MONOGRAFIA/LIVRO - NACIONAL................................................................................. 26 MONOGRAFIA/LIVRO - INTERNACIONAL ......................................................................................... 26 TRABALHO DE EVENTO - INTERNACIONAL .................................................................................... 26 TRABALHO DE EVENTO - NACIONAL............................................................................................... 27 TRABALHO DE EVENTO-ANAIS PERIÓDICO - INTERNACIONAL................................................... 28 TRABALHO DE EVENTO-RESUMO – NACIONAL ............................................................................ 28 TRABALHO DE EVENTO-RESUMO - INTERNACIONAL .................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • In Defence of Curiosity Driven Basic Scientific Research
    FEATURE ARTICLE In Defence of Curiosity Driven Basic Scientific Research Felix Bast curiosity, wondered what causes UST take a look at products ray. Faraday’s and Thompson’s them to fluoresce, which ultimately that we take for granted – seminal discoveries opened up led to the development of the Green the mobile phone, computer, the whole vista for the subsequent J Fluorescent Protein (GFP). Most of internet, electricity, GPS, radar, radio, development of electronic gadgets. these products were the resultants of television, air conditioner, X-rays, Albert Einstein’s theory of decades-long collaborative research. aircraft, lasers, electric engines; even relativity is used in today’s GPS The promises of overnight success vaccines, antibiotic drugs, advanced devices. The internet and the World deliverables by applied utility-driven genome-editing tool CRISPR/CAS9 Wide Web was the result of a curiosity- research is nothing but mere myth and Velcro. The list is endless. A vast driven idea to support a network of like those purported panaceas of majority of the products including all particle physicists. Alexander Fleming pseudosciences. tech gadgets comprising the modern did not develop penicillin in some Science in its purest basic form consumerist lifestyle were developed target-oriented applied research; he is indeed driven by human being’s by the Western or Japanese scientists. serendipitously discovered a clear innate desire and curiosity to know halo around fungal contaminations in But without an application- the wonders of nature. This scientific discarded petri-dishes. oriented, agenda-driven research curiosity is akin to a child’s curiosity. those commercial blockbuster products Nature continues to pique A child might ask questions like would never have been developed, curiosity and inspire engineers to ‘why we yawn’, ‘why plants don’t right? The so-called pure or basic mimic it (the discipline is called get cancer’ and so on.
    [Show full text]