Philodromus Aureolus Middle Sized to Rather Big Male: Fully Iridescent Including Carapace, Greenish-Purple, with Broad Cymbiums

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Philodromus Aureolus Middle Sized to Rather Big Male: Fully Iridescent Including Carapace, Greenish-Purple, with Broad Cymbiums Philodromus aureolus Middle sized to rather big Male: Fully iridescent including carapace, greenish-purple, with broad cymbiums Female&juvenile: Variable; from bright golden to dark brown, can be rusty, brownish, orange-ish, even silverish grey. White markings usually absent or inconspicious, cardiac mark not very prominent. Legs dark, distally with differentiated but usually faint or obscured annulations, femora darker, rather not translucent Philodromus buchari Large Male: Fully iridescent including carapace, greenish purple Female&juvenile: Bright to rather pale; usually golden or copper coloured. White markings may be present, cardiac mark prominent. Legs usually with differentiated annulations, femora pale and translucent Philodromus cespitum Medium sized Male: pale, with a silverish iridescent abdomen and rusty carapace&legs (although I possess a specimen which was fully iridescent and dark when alive); cymbiums narrow Female&juvenile: Very variable but generally pale or bright. Can be copper or golden coloured, sandy or rusty, or nearly yellowish, white or silverish. White markings sometimes present but usually absent, cardiac mark not very prominent. Legs rather pale, annulations usually not differentiated, femora pale and translucent, sometimes bluish. Philodromus collinus Rather small Male: completely iridescent including carapace, greenish-purple Female&juvenile: Rather dark, rusty, bronzen or brown. White markings usually present, cardiac mark not very prominent yet noticeable and overall darker than rest of abdomen, usually encircled in white. Legs dark, distally very dark, femora not translucent and usually up to 2/3 distally darkened (a medial dark ring, especially on the femora I and II, is usually present apart from the distal one, and the two might be fused) Philodromus longipalpis Rather big Male: non-iridescent, yellowish to brownish, with bluish femora and conspiciously long legs. Female&juvenile: Rather conservative, pale yellow or otherwise pale. Cardiac mark not very conspicious. Legs pale, only slightly darkened distally, with faint rather not differentiated annulations. Femora pale, can be bluish. Philodromus marmoratus Large Male: Almost non-iridescent, greyish-brown. Cymbiums large and broad Female&juvenile: Rather conservative, grey, usually pale. Carapace band with serrated margins, cardiac mark not very prominent. Posterolaterally on abdomen with black lines (extended caudal spots?). Legs distally darkened, but sometimes not very conspiciously. Femora mostly pale Philodromus praedatus Small to medium, gracile Male: weakly greenish iridescent on both abdomen and cephalothorax, leg annulations and cardiac mark visible, with a prominent longitudinal dark median line on carapace Female&juvenile: variable in colour, but rather pale or bright: copper or golden. Cardiac mark prominent, dark. Legs with pale femora and distinct annulations distally. 1. Philodromus aureolus female and male, from Batak dam, Bulgaria (top row) 2. Philodromus buchari male, Sofia, as subadult and adult (bottom row) 3. Philodromus cespitum, diverse specimens (two females from Sofia – top, one male from Varvarini bani – bottom left, and an atypical male from Miloslavtsi near Tran – bottom right) 4. Philodromus longipalpis, first row – subadult male and female from Sofia, second row left – above male after reaching maturity 5. Philodromus marmoratus, second row right – mature male from Sofia, bottom row – left, mature female from Greece, right – above male as subadult 6. Philodromus praedatus, mature male from Sofia Note that this might not reflect the complete variability of any of yhr species depicted .
Recommended publications
  • Catálogo Y Atlas De Las Arañas De La Familia Philodromidae Thorell, 1870 De La Península Iberica E Islas Baleares
    Graellsia, 51: 55-81 (1995) CATÁLOGO Y ATLAS DE LAS ARAÑAS DE LA FAMILIA PHILODROMIDAE THORELL, 1870 DE LA PENÍNSULA IBERICA E ISLAS BALEARES C. Urones (*) RESUMEN En este artículo se da el listado de las 38 especies de Philodromidae (Araneae) cono- cidas en la Península Ibérica y Baleares. La lista ordenada alfabéticamente, se presenta indicando las localidades por provincias y referencias bibliográficas donde se ha citado cada especie. Se incluye el material existente en la colección del Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales de Madrid, así como ejemplares de Philodromidae de otras proce- dencias. Se da el atlas provisional de distribución de las especies de Philodromidae para España peninsular e islas Baleares, y para Portugal y Andorra. La distribución de cada especie se indica sobre mapas de cuadrícula U.T.M. de 50 km de lado. Y se aportan ade- más datos sobre su hábitat y ciclos de vida. Palabras clave: Arañas, Araneae, Philodromidae, Distribución Geográfica, España, Portugal ABSTRACT Catalogue and atlas of the Spider Family Philodromidae Thorell, 1870 of Iberian Peninsule and Balearic Islands A check-list of 38 species of Philodromidae found in Iberian Peninsula and Balearic Islands is given. The list, in alphabetic order, contains the provinces and bibliographic references where the species are cited. The material of Philodromidae from the “Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales in Madrid” has been studied, also several exemplars are examined. The provisional atlas of distribution of the species the Philodromidae in Spain, Portugal and Andorra is given, together with a distribution map for each species. We also give some data concerning its habitat and life cycle.
    [Show full text]
  • SRS News 66.Pub
    www.britishspiders.org.uk S.R.S. News. No. 66 In Newsl. Br. arachnol. Soc. 117 Spider Recording Scheme News March 2010, No. 66 Editor: Peter Harvey; [email protected]@britishspiders.org.uk My thanks to those who have contributed to this issue. S.R.S. News No. 67 will be published in July 2010. Please send contributions by the end of May at the latest to Peter Harvey, 32 Lodge Lane, GRAYS, Essex, RM16 2YP; e-mail: [email protected] or [email protected] Editorial Hillyard noted that it had been recorded at Edinburgh. This was not mapped, but probably refers to a record from As usual I am very grateful to all the contributors who have provided articles for this issue. Please keep the Lothian Wildlife Information Centre ‘Secret Garden providing articles. Survey’. The species was found in Haddington, to the Work on a Spider Recording Scheme website was east of Edinburgh and south of the Firth of Forth in delayed by hiccups in the OPAL grant process and the October 1995 (pers. comm. Bob Saville). These records timeslot originally set aside for the work has had to be appear on the National Biodiversity Network Gateway. reorganised. Work should now be completed by the end of D. ramosus is generally synanthropic and is common May this year. in gardens where it can be beaten from hedges and trees, As always many thanks are due to those Area especially conifers. However many peoples’ first Organisers, MapMate users and other recorders who have experience of this species will be of seeing it spread- provided their records to the scheme during 2009 and eagled on a wall (especially if the wall is whitewashed – early this year.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamics and Phenology of Ballooning Spiders in an Agricultural Landscape of Western Switzerland
    Departement of Biology University of Fribourg (Switzerland) Dynamics and phenology of ballooning spiders in an agricultural landscape of Western Switzerland THESIS Presented to the Faculty of Science of the University of Fribourg (Switzerland) in consideration for the award of the academic grade of Doctor rerum naturalium by Gilles Blandenier from Villiers (NE, Switzerland) Dissertation No 1840 UniPrint 2014 Accepted by the Faculty of Science of the Universtiy of Fribourg (Switzerland) upon the recommendation of Prof. Dr. Christian Lexer (University of Fribourg) and Prof. Dr. Søren Toft (University of Aarhus, Denmark), and the President of the Jury Prof. Simon Sprecher (University of Fribourg). Fribourg, 20.05.2014 Thesis supervisor The Dean Prof. Louis-Félix Bersier Prof. Fritz Müller Contents Summary / Résumé ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 1 Chapter 1 General Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Chapter 2 Ballooning of spiders (Araneae) in Switzerland: general results from an eleven-years survey ............................................................................................................................................................................ 11 Chapter 3 Are phenological
    [Show full text]
  • Toxicity of Insecticides and Miticides to Natural Enemies in Australian Grains: a Review
    insects Review Toxicity of Insecticides and Miticides to Natural Enemies in Australian Grains: A Review Kathy Overton 1,*, Ary A. Hoffmann 2 , Olivia L. Reynolds 1 and Paul A. Umina 1,2 1 Cesar Australia, 293 Royal Parade, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia; [email protected] (O.L.R.); [email protected] (P.A.U.) 2 Pest and Environmental Adaptation Research Group, School of BioSciences, Bio21 Institute, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Simple Summary: Controlling invertebrate pests in crop fields using chemicals has been the main management strategy within the Australian grains industry for decades. However, chemical use can have unintended effects on natural enemies, which can play a key role in suppressing and controlling pest outbreaks within crops. We undertook a literature review of studies that have conducted chemical toxicity testing against arthropod natural enemies relevant to the Australian grains industry to examine trends and highlight research gaps and priorities. Most toxicity trials have been conducted in the laboratory, with few at larger, and hence, industry-relevant scales. Researchers have used a variety of methods when conducting toxicity testing, making it difficult to compare within and across different species of natural enemies. Furthermore, we found many gaps in testing, leading to unknown toxicity effects for several key natural enemies, some of which are economically important predators and parasitoids. Through our review, we make several key recommendations for future areas of research that could arm farmers and their advisors with the knowledge they need to make informed decisions when it comes to controlling crop pests.
    [Show full text]
  • (Araneae) As Polyphagous Natural Enemies in Orchards" by S
    SPIDERS (ARANEAE) ASPOLYPHAGOU S NATURAL ENEMIES IN ORCHARDS Promotor: dr. J. C. van Lenteren hoogleraar ind e Entomologie inhe tbijzonde r deoecologi e der insecten Co-Promotor: dr. ir. P.J . M.Mol s universitair docent Laboratoriumvoo r Entomologie ,> - • Sandor Bogya SPIDERS (ARANEAE) ASPOLYPHAGOU S NATURAL ENEMIES IN ORCHARDS Proefschrift terverkrijgin g vand e graad vandocto r opgeza gva n derecto r magnificus van deLandbouwuniversitei t Wageningen, dr. C.M .Karssen , inhe t openbaar te verdedingen opdinsda g 27apri l 1999 desnamiddag st e 13.30uu r ind eAul a to my parents ISBN: 90 580803 74 cover drawings by Jozsef Kovacs BIBLIOTHEEK LANDBOUWUNIVERSITEIT WAGENINGEN Propositions 1. Workers in the field of biological control should not try to make the spider fit the mold of the specialist predator or parasitoid. Riechert& Lockley(1984 )Ann . Rev. Entomol.29:299-320 . ThisThesi s 2. Single spider species cannot, but whole spider communities, as complexes of generalist predators can be effective in controlling pests. Wise(1995 )Spider si necologica lwebs .Cambridg eUniversit yPres s ThisThesi s 3. Careful use of pesticides in orchard IPM programs may result in development of more complex and abundant spider communities, thereby augmenting biological pest control. ThisThesi s 4. Cluster analysis and measurement of ecological similarity are two parts art and one part science, and ecological intuition is essential to successfully interpret the results. Krebs(1989 )Ecologica lmethodology .Harpe r& Row Publisher ThisThesi s 5. If you have an apple and I have an apple and we exchange these apples then you and I will still each have one apple.
    [Show full text]
  • A Check-List of the Spiders of Arkansas Peggy Rae Dorris Henderson State University
    Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science Volume 39 Article 10 1985 A Check-list of the Spiders of Arkansas Peggy Rae Dorris Henderson State University Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas Part of the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation Dorris, Peggy Rae (1985) "A Check-list of the Spiders of Arkansas," Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science: Vol. 39 , Article 10. Available at: http://scholarworks.uark.edu/jaas/vol39/iss1/10 This article is available for use under the Creative Commons license: Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0). Users are able to read, download, copy, print, distribute, search, link to the full texts of these articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UARK. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science by an authorized editor of ScholarWorks@UARK. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science, Vol. 39 [1985], Art. 10 A CHECK-LIST OF THE SPIDERS OF ARKANSAS PEGGY RAE DORRIS Henderson State University Arkadelphia, AR 71923 ABSTRACT Collections of spiders were made from 1966, to the present in the sixphysiographic regions of Arkan- sas. During this time 435 species representing 35 families were collected and recorded. INTRODUCTION mixed grasses, fields ofmixed grasses, shrubs, herbs, mud-dauber nests, and water surfaces. The number ofspecimens decreased as temperature Research has been in progress for the past 18 years to provide a and humidity increased.
    [Show full text]
  • The Spiders of Robert Collett; a Revision of the First Norwegian Spider Collection
    © Norwegian Journal of Entomology. 5 June 2009 The spiders of Robert Collett; a revision of the first Norwegian spider collection. Part I. Families Araneidae, Gnaphosidae, Sparassidae, Anyphaenidae, Thomisidae, Zoridae and Philodromidae KJETIL AAKRA Aakra, K. 2005. The spiders of Robert Collett; a revision of the first Norwegian spider collection. Part I. Families Araneidae, Gnaphosidae, Sparassidae, Anyphaenidae, Thomisidae, Zoridae and Philodromidae. Norw. J. Entomol. 56, 15–19 The oldest extant Norwegian spider material published by Robert Collett in 1876–77 (families Araneidae, Gnaphosidae, Sparassidae, Anyphaenidae, Thomisidae, Zoridae and Philodromidae) has been reviewed. Valid and invalid records are listed. One new synonymy is established, Gnaphosa pseudolapponica Strand, 1904 = Gnaphosa lapponum (L. Koch, 1866). Even if a relatively large number of the records published by Collett must be invalidated due to the inclusion of juvenile/ subadult material, the collection remains important for Norwegian araneofaunistics. Keywords: Araneae, revision, Norwegian spiders material, Araneidae, Gnaphosidae, Anyphaenidae, Philodromidae Kjetil Aakra, Midt-Troms Museum. P.O.Box 82. NO-9059 Storsteinnes, Norway. E-mail: [email protected] Introduction other Norwegian families. These, however, were published by Strand (1904a,b) almost thirty years In addition to his many other zoological later. Strand described several new gnaphosids publications, Robert Collett (1842–1913) also from this material, one of which, Gnaphosa published
    [Show full text]
  • Neurons and a Sensory Organ in the Pedipalps of Male Spiders Reveal That It Is Not a Numb Structure Received: 28 February 2017 Lenka Sentenská1, Carsten H.G
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Neurons and a sensory organ in the pedipalps of male spiders reveal that it is not a numb structure Received: 28 February 2017 Lenka Sentenská1, Carsten H.G. Müller2, Stano Pekár1 & Gabriele Uhl2 Accepted: 29 August 2017 The primary function of male copulatory organs is depositing spermatozoa directly into the female Published: xx xx xxxx reproductive tract. Typical male copulatory organs are sensorily active. This is in contrast to the copulatory organs of male spiders (i.e. palpal bulbi), which have been assumed to lack nerves and muscles until recently. Neurons have been found within the bulbus of the spider Hickmania troglodytes, a taxon basal to all Neocribellata. We provide the frst evidence for neurons and an internalized multi- sensillar sensory organ in the bulbus of an entelegyne spider (Philodromus cespitum). The sensory organ likely provides mechanical or chemical feedback from the intromitting structure, the embolus. We found further neurons associated with two glands within the bulbus, one of which is likely responsible for sperm extrusion during mating. These fndings provide a new framework for studies on reproductive behaviour and sexual selection in spiders. Te primary function of male copulatory organs is depositing spermatozoa directly into the female reproductive tract. Te complexity of most animal genitalia and their rapid and divergent evolution strongly suggest that copu- latory organs have evolved to such diversity in the context of cryptic female mate choice and sperm competition, and may even function as internal courtship devices1. Accordingly, typical male copulatory organs are equipped with a wealth of muscles and nerves, are able to expand and move and are sensorily active.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Selective Insecticides on the Beneficial Spider Community of a Pear Orchard in the Czech Republic
    1998. P. A. Selden (ed.). Proceedings of the 17th European Colloquium of Arachnology, Edinburgh 1997. Effect of selective insecticides on the beneficial spider community of a pear orchard in the Czech Republic Stanislav Pekár Research Institute of Crop Production, Drnovská 507, Praha 6 – Ruzyneˇ, Czech Republic Summary The effect of four selective insecticides on the spider community of a pear orchard has been stud- ied over a two-year period. Applications were used against resistant populations of the pear psyllid, Psylla pyri (Linnaeus), that evolved during “non-selective” insecticide management in the previous years. The effect on spiders was most apparent immediately after application. Application of flucycloxuron was drastic for spiders, but failed in pest control. Tefluhexuron and hexaflumuron were less harmful to spiders and most efficient for the control of the pear psyllid. Both spiders and psyllids were almost unaffected by diflubenzuron application. Partial redundancy analysis (RDA) revealed that the effects of the various selective insecticides on the spider community were signifi- cantly different. The ordination diagram helped to determine species susceptibility to these insecti- cides: for example, ambush spiders (Thomisidae and Philodromidae) were found to be most susceptible to flucycloxuron and hexaflumuron. Diversity indices did not reveal marked differences between treatments. The spider community was not affected after applications of selective insecti- cides to the extent that it was after non-selective insecticides. The mean abundance, as well as number of species, increased one year after “selective” management. The very high numbers of pear psyllids probably influenced the spider community and allowed hunting spiders, such as Misumenops tricuspidatus to become fairly abundant.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Ohio Spiders
    List of Ohio Spiders 20 March 2018 Richard A. Bradley Department of EEO Biology Ohio State University Museum of Biodiversity 1315 Kinnear Road Columbus, OH 43212 This list is based on published specimen records of spider species from Ohio. Additional species that have been recorded during the Ohio Spider Survey (beginning 1994) are also included. I would very much appreciate any corrections; please mail them to the above address or email ([email protected]). 656 [+5] Species Mygalomorphae Antrodiaetidae (foldingdoor spiders) (2) Antrodiaetus robustus (Simon, 1890) Antrodiaetus unicolor (Hentz, 1842) Atypidae (purseweb spiders) (3) Sphodros coylei Gertsch & Platnick, 1980 Sphodros niger (Hentz, 1842) Sphodros rufipes (Latreille, 1829) Ctenizidae (trapdoor spiders) (1) Ummidia audouini (Lucas, 1835) Araneomorphae Agelenidae (funnel weavers) (14) Agelenopsis emertoni Chamberlin & Ivie, 1935 | Agelenopsis kastoni Chamberlin & Ivie, 1941 | Agelenopsis naevia (Walckenaer, 1805) grass spiders Agelenopsis pennsylvanica (C.L. Koch, 1843) | Agelnopsis potteri (Blackwell, 1846) | Agelenopsis utahana (Chamberlin & Ivie, 1933) | Coras aerialis Muma, 1946 Coras juvenilis (Keyserling, 1881) Coras lamellosus (Keyserling, 1887) Coras medicinalis (Hentz, 1821) Coras montanus (Emerton, 1889) Tegenaria domestica (Clerck, 1757) barn funnel weaver In Wadotes calcaratus (Keyserling, 1887) Wadotes hybridus (Emerton, 1889) Amaurobiidae (hackledmesh weavers) (2) Amaurobius ferox (Walckenaer, 1830) In Callobius bennetti (Blackwall, 1848) Anyphaenidae (ghost spiders)
    [Show full text]
  • SRS News 76.Pub
    S.R.S. News. No. 76. In Newsl. Br. arachnol. Soc. 127 www.britishspiders.org.uk Spider Recording Scheme News Summer 2013, No. 76 Editor: Peter Harvey; [email protected]@britishspiders.org.uk SRS website: http://srs.britishspiders.org.uk My thanks to those who have contributed to this issue. S.R.S. News No. 77 will be published in Autumn 2013. Please send contributions by the end of September at the latest to Peter Harvey, 32 Lodge Lane, GRAYS, Essex, RM16 2YP; e-mail: [email protected] or [email protected]. The newsletter depends on your contributions! Editorial As always, thank you to the contributors who have Grant’s contact details are: provided articles for this issue. Please help future issues by providing articles, short or longer, on interesting Room E27, Bute Building, University of St Andrews, Fife discoveries and observations. KY16 9TS; email [email protected] We now have 947,447 SRS records in total to date in MapMate, 400,924 of which have SRS Phase 2 site- Dave Blackledge is taking on the role of Area Organiser related information on broad habitat and other site-related for VC's 69 and 70 from the late Jennifer Newton (see data. All these data are uploaded and summarised on the below). His contact details are: SRS website. We have to date had 85,631 visits, 52,454 unique 6 Scotch Street, Port Carlisle, Wigton, Cumbria CA7 visitors and 548,902 page views from 152 countries/ 5BZ; email [email protected]. If you use territories since the Spider and Harvestmen Recording MapMate for recording and have Cumbria records to Scheme website went live in July 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • A Gap Analysis of Biodiversity Research in Rocky Mountain National Park: a Pilot Study on Spiders
    A GAP ANALYSIS OF BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH IN ROCKY MOUNTAIN NATIONAL PARK: A PILOT STUDY ON SPIDERS FINAL REPORT By ATBI/BIOBLITZ SWAT TEAM Sahil Chaini Zhenzhen Chen Casey Johnson Jianyu Wu Dr. James Clark, Adviser April 24th 2015 Master’s project submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Environmental Management degree in the Nicholas School of the Environment of Duke University 2015 Executive Summary Research on biodiversity and the relationship between organisms is imperative to establish management practices for the conservation of protected areas. The E.O. Wilson Biodiversity Foundation (EOWBF) formed our team of four Duke University students as the first of many ATBI/BioBlitz SWAT teams to travel to protected areas and develop approaches to conduct All Taxa Biodiversity Inventory (ATBI) and BioBlitz that can inform their conservation. Upon arrival at Rocky Mountain National Park (RMNP), we conducted data mining to determine major gaps in the understanding of biodiversity inventories. We used available species lists from research conducted in the Park to ensure that the National Park species database, NPSpecies, contains the most up-to- date information. Our team added 645 species of plants and fungi to the database through this process. After completing this gap analysis, we identified spiders as the subject of our field study. This document consists of five sections. The first section provides background information about RMNP. We discuss the extreme elevational gradient and variety of habitat types that occur in the park. These major physical and biological processes have motivated three hypotheses to study spiders. We hypothesize that spider species richness: (1) is higher during night sampling than day sampling; (2) decreases as elevation increases; and (3) is higher in riparian zones.
    [Show full text]