Local Resident Submissions to the Cotswold Council Electoral Review
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Local resident submissions to the Cotswold Council electoral review This PDF document contains 23 submissions from local residents . Some versions of Adobe allow the viewer to move quickly between bookmarks. Click on the submission you would like to view. If you are not taken to that page, please scroll through the document. Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 1 Cotswold District Personal Details: Name: Debra Andrews E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Feature Annotations 1: 2: Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database rights 2013. Map Features: Annotation 1: Annotation 2: Comment text: I understand that this is to make more equality for numbers for voters but it really doesn't make sense to cut off a small piece of lechlade to tack on to fairford south. I believe all of Lechlade needs to be represented by a single member . Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/3044 17/04/2014 Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 1 Cotswold District Personal Details: Name: Rosemary Andrews E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Comment text: Dear Sirs Having reviewed the changes you propose for the division of the Kempsford Lechlade ward I feel that it does not fulfil your criteria of creating unified communities. Your proposals will split Lechlade unnaturally since at the moment the Wern development is actually part of the town of Lechlade and within its natural boundary. Fairford also loses its integrity as a complete town. Kempsford thus becomes a mish mash rather than an integral community in its own right and therefore cannot have its iinterests properly presented. given that for dental and doctors' surgeries and for shopping the residents of Kempsford naturally go to Fairford, it would seem illogical to link it with a tiny part of Lechlade. Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/3270 17/04/2014 Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 1 Cotswold District Personal Details: Name: Stephen Andrews E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Feature Annotations Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database rights 2013. Map Features: Annotation 1: Proposed boundary revision between Lechlade Ward Comment text: The proposal for Fairford South and Kempsford meets only one of the guiding principles electoral equality. Of the other two, the current proposal splits communities and in not closely following parish/town boundaries complicates effective and convenient local government. The Main area of concern is the overlap with the Parish of Lechlade. The communities of Downington, Green Farm, The Wern, Butlers Court and Moorgate are logically part of Lechlade and have weak to no community connection to Fairford South and Kempsford. The proposal is to amend the current proposal so that the boundary continues from the North down Bryworth Lane to the A417 then continues southward along the edge of the lake before cutting East along a track to the currently proposed boundary. (see Map) Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/3271 24/04/2014 Morrison, William From: Fuller, Heather Sent: 27 March 2014 10:43 To: Morrison, William Subject: FW: Electoral review of Cotswold District Council - Lechlade and Fairford Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged From: Hall Dale [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 26 March 2014 15:21 To: Reviews@ Subject: Electoral review of Cotswold District Council - Lechlade and Fairford Dear Sir / Madame, Your proposal to make the West part of Lechlade, including the Wern where I live part of the Fairford Ward is absolutely preposterous! It is a wonderful example of ‘Ivory Tower’ thinking that completely misses the point. I have lived in Lechlade all of my life and have already experienced the blatant sideling by the Cotswold District Council such as the exclusion of the right to bid for European grant money (though I note you are happy to collect parking fines from a community where we were quite happily self‐managing our parking), which was absolutely baffling as surely proposed projects were judged on their merit and the unjustified exclusion flies in the face of the European philosophy; I am not digressing because I suspect Lechlade was excluded from bidding due to its location on the fringe of the Cotswolds, low influence and high self‐dependence based on the hard work of the residents and it is the same principals, only worse, that will result in a remote and forgotten ‘West Lechlade’ completely unrepresented if your ridiculous proposal is taken Forward given that Fairford is over 3 miles away through open Countryside whereas the centre of Lechlade is just a short stroll. If there was ever an example of common sense blowing to the wind, this has got to be it! The ‘common sense’ revolution once banded by the Tories was as laughable then as it is now. I’m not apologetic for the tone and content of my e‐mail, because it conveys the absolute ludicrousness of proposal. Drop this proposal and Keep Lechlade as Lechlade! Regards, Dale Hall ************************************************************************** ************************************************************************** ************ The content of this email (and any attachment) is confidential. It may also be legally privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. This email should not be used by anyone who is not an original intended recipient, nor may it be copied or disclosed to anyone who is not an original intended recipient. 1 Morrison, William From: Fuller, Heather Sent: 02 April 2014 11:07 To: Morrison, William Subject: FW: Proposed change of Cotswold District Wards for Lechlade and Fairford South/Kempsford/Lechlade Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged From: David and Mary Bainbridge [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 31 March 2014 18:08 To: Reviews@ Subject: Proposed change of Cotswold District Wards for Lechlade and Fairford South/Kempsford/Lechlade Dear Sirs Can I urgently request that the suggested change in the Ward boundary to separate part of the West of Lechlade into the 'Fairford South, Kempsford and Lechlade' ward is dropped. It is important for community cohesion and for enrolment in St Lawrence School that the whole of Lechlade is designated as a single electoral ward. Thank you. David Bainbridge 2 Kingsmead Lechlade Glos GL7 3BW Tel : 01367 250347 1 Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 1 Cotswold District Personal Details: Name: John Barrett E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Comment text: I disagree with the proposal to divide the Lechlade town area at the western end and join it with Fairford . I appreciate the desire to balance the number of residents per councillor but logistics make this proposal illogical due to distance. The boundry should be Byworth lane or west of Claydon. Please register my objection to this proposal Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/3156 17/04/2014 Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 1 Cotswold District Personal Details: Name: Colin Barwick E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Comment text: I do not feel that it is in the best interest of electors to split off a very small part of Lechlade and and attach it to the South Fairford ward. I recognise that lechlade in its entirety as one ward would mean that it might have slightly more electors than some other wards but Lechlade is a self contained little town with its own issues that needs to be treated as one ward with one voice.The tiny area that it is proposed to link with South Fairford has everything in common with Lechlade and nothing in common with Fairford. Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/3045 17/04/2014 Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 1 Cotswold District Personal Details: Name: Colin Barwick E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Feature Annotations 1: Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database rights 2013. Map Features: Annotation 1: Comment text: I consider the proposal not to have the whole of Lechlade as one ward to be flawed. I appreciate that it will mean a slightly higher number of electors if the very tiny part of Lechade to the west, that it is proposed to attach South Fairford, is instead kept within the Lechlade ward but this disadvantage is considerably outwayed by the fact all the issues for thios part of the town relate to Leclade and none to Fairford. See map Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/3046 17/04/2014 Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 1 Cotswold District Personal Details: Name: Christopher Baxter E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Comment text: The new ward boundaries suggested by The Cotswold District Council for Lechlade would appear to be flawed as the West side of Lechlade would be cut off from the Town and from a personal point of view the division cuts our farmland in half meaning that some of our property would be in the Fairford South & Kempsford Ward whilst our house and rest of Land would be in Lechlade Ward. We do not feel that this is a practical move or in the best interest of the electors and that the division would be better to follow the Parish boundary to the West of Lechlade. Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/3284 24/04/2014 Morrison, William From: Egan, Helen Sent: 10 April 2014 09:52 To: Morrison, William Subject: FW: Ward boundaries Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Hi Will, Please see sub below for Cotswold.