DOCSLIB.ORG

Syr Northern Humanitarian Das

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Syr Northern Humanitarian Das Syrian Arab Republic: Humanitarian Dashboard - Eight Governorates June 2014 (Issued on 30 Jul 2014) SITUATION OVERVIEW With regard to the overall situation, continued conflict between various armed opposition groups has blocked many key access routes to many areas from inside Syria. ISIS and other armed opposition groups fought intensely for the control of Aleppo, southern Al-Hasakeh and Deir-ez-Zor, with ISIS consolidating control of most of Deir-ez-Zor governorate and launching an offensive on opposition positions in Northern rural Aleppo. This prompted ISIS and armed opposition groups to engage in reciprocal blocks on humanitarian access, with a significant impact in eastern rural Aleppo, Deir-ez-Zor, Al- Hasakeh and Ar-Raqqa governorates. June also saw an increase in bombardment by the Government of Syria on ISIS-held territories and positions, especially in Ar-Raqqa. Opposition forces advanced on government-controlled positions in Northern Hama around Morek, displacing tens of thousands towards the Turkish border. Government forces also continued to advance incrementally around the North-East of Aleppo city, blocking the main access route into opposition-controlled eastern Aleppo city and intensely bombarding and shelling the only remaining routes – Handarat and Castello, sustaining fears that the government would soon seal off all access to the East of the city. Opposition forces withdrew from Kassab in Lattakia, reopening humanitarian access to the town from government-held areas. As a result, protection of civilians and the most vulnerable remains one of the major concerns of the humanitarian community. Over the reporting period approximately 500,000 beneficiaries have been assisted with food by the Turkey based partners. The reach of WASH partners remained very high with over 2 million people benefitting from maintenance of water system and one-off distribution of hygiene kits. Health partners provided various services to about 400,000 people. Due to the deteriorating security situation and the expected sealing off of eastern Aleppo, the inter-sector working group developed an Aleppo Emergency Response Plan calling for the pre-positioning of essential supplies (food, medicines and NFI) for 200,000 people in eastern Aleppo. KEY FIGURES IDPs 1 IDPs in Camp 2 People in Need 3 4.1 million 163,069 5.5 - 7.5 million in 111 Camps Based on SINA estimate of IDPs in 111 sub- Figure is based on SINA assessment districts in eight governorates. covering 111 out of 173 sub-districts in eight governorates. People in need was reported 3% per sector (food, shelter, health and water) in SINA Coverage each sub-district. Lower figure in the range 5.5 million is the number of people in need increase since reported for highest scoring sector i.e. food. May 2014 AL-HASAKEH Figure 7.5 million is the aggregated number ALEPPO AR-RAQQA using maximum number of people in need IDLEB LATTAKIA reported across four sectors (food, shelter, HAMA DEIR-EZ-ZOR health, water) at sub-district level. HOMS The figures above do not reflect all people in need of protection. Assessment Coverage SINA coverage Data not collected TARGETED AND REACHED 4 Number of people targeted % reached Number of people Reported Month million of target thousands in need targeted reached CCCM 0.16 100% 1233.0 163.1 163.1 Jun-14 Education 0.43 35% 1700.0 434.0 150.5 Jun-14 Food Security 5.50 52% 5500.0 5500.0 2865.2 May-14 and Livelihoods Health 3.43 11% 3430.0 3430.0 386.0 Jun-14 Shelter and NFIs 2.50 6% 3700.0 2500.0 159.1 Jun-14 WASH 3.70 62% 4300.0 3700.0 2280.0 Jun-14 n/a figures not available *Eight governorates - Aleppo, Ar-Raqqa, Al-Hasakeh, Deir-ez-Zor, Idleb, Lattakia, Hama and Homs. Syria Integrated Needs Assessment (SINA) was a joint multi-sector assessment covering 111 sub-districts in eight governorates of the northern Syria. Not all sub- districts of these governorates were covered in the assessment. In need, targeted and reached figures are as reported by sectors. Creation date: 30 July 2014 Feedback: [email protected] https://stima.humanitarianresponse.info/ Sources: Sector reports Syrian Arab Republic: Humanitarian Dashboard - Eight Governorates June 2014 (Issued on 30 Jul 2014) STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES** Engage in joint advocacy with national, international, and non-state actors for unhindered access and protection of civilians, 1 including the promotion of humanitarian space, cross border and cross line operations, and the lifting of sieges in compliance with UN Security Council Resolutions. 2 Provide life-saving and life sustaining humanitarian assistance to all Syrians in need prioritising the most vulnerable in accordance with humanitarian principles and standards. 3 Support and protect resilience of communities, sustainable livelihoods and the rehabilitation of social and public services. Systematically strengthen the capacity of Syrian civil society, including local NGOs and other humanitarian actors responding to 4 the humanitarian crisis in Syria. Strengthen the protection environment at the community and national level to prevent or mitigate violations and promote respect for 5 international human rights and international humanitarian law. Strengthen coordination and communication amongst and between all relevant actors, including communities, national and 6 international NGOs, UN agencies to promote cohesion and accountability of humanitarian actors responding to the Syria crisis. ** These strategic objectives are from the Inter-Sector Response Plan prepared for the period of July 2014 to June 2015 CAMP COORDINATION AND CAMP MANAGEMENT The CCCM Sector is covering about 170,000 IDPs living in 111 IDP Settlments, the members of the WG continue to provide Total estimated number of displaced people living in adwquate updates on these camps in terms of management situation, locations, situation, number of IDPs and services displacement sites (camps and camp like set up) provision. 163,069 reached Needs Response 100% Most of the camps do not provide adequate shelter to the The provision of services in IDP camps are divided among IDPs, many of these shelter are temporary, they don’t meet the sector members based on their capacities in the terms of 163,069 SPHERE standards and many need to be replaced. WASH access, expertise, availability of funding and contingency. target (individuals) and NFI is a popular activity in IDP camps because of funds Based on these factors, each camp has sector focal points to availability. However, needs are unmet due to security be considered as the last-resort services provider. constraints and lack of proper management in IDP camps. Number and Percentage of displacement sites with Food assistance is a gap in many IDP camps, only few regular multi-sector services reporting and monitoring NGOs are reportedly delivering food, among those, only to an agreed reporting cycle fewer access Aleppo camps. Monitoring health is challenging Gaps because most of health facilities are not located inside the The most important missing services in the IDP camps camps. However, some NGOs were able to provide medical 129,000 remains the camp management capacities since most of assistance in the IDPs camps. Two NGOs are providing reached the actors are covering the life-saving need inside the mobile medical teams to Aleppo IDP camps. The CCCM camps without providing camp management inputs. 79% does not have information on the availability of education 163,069 services in Aleppo and Ar-Raqqa IDP Camps. target (individuals) Plan/Forecast Data is collected from the IDP camps and services The IDP camps in Aleppo and Ar-Raqqa are planned to be provision table. improved to ensure that they will meet SPHERE For more information contact the CCCM Sector standards. This activity will benefit more than 60,000 IDPs Coordinator, Dher Hayo, Email: [email protected] living in 9 IDP camps. EDUCATION Total number of children, youth and education personnel Education key needs are rehabilitation of learning spaces, provision of new learning spaces; provision of textbooks and learning reached to increase access to safe education and materials; support to teachers. The level of psycho social stress and vulnerability of children and youth needs to addressed in improved quality of learning response activites. 150,501 reached 35% Needs Response Education key needs are rehabilitation of learning spaces, Education key response elements include provision of safe 434,000 provision of new learning spaces; provision of textbooks learning spaces, provision of textbooks and learning target (individuals) and learning materials; support to teachers. The level of materials and teacher development and support. psycho social stress and vulnerability of children and youth needs to addressed in response activites. Gaps Education sector has major gaps in current information and information on cross-line activities. It appears that there are many actors providing services who are not participating in the WG. Data is for June 2014 as reported by 17 partners. Please contact [email protected] Creation date: 30 July 2014 Feedback: [email protected] https://stima.humanitarianresponse.info/ Sources: Sector reports Syrian Arab Republic: Humanitarian Dashboard - Eight Governorates June 2014 (Issued on 30 Jul 2014) FOOD SECURITY AND LIVELIHOODS Address the critical needs of conflict-affected populations in Syria by: % individuals vs target achieving the minimum standard - increasing access to food (food baskets, cooked meals and mixed food items) 1600kcal pp/day on a monthly basis, due to the provision - supporting livelihood investments (agricultural inputs, animal feed, vouchers) of assistance equal or greater than 1500kcal pp/day - providing safety net (flour and bread) 2,865,172 reached Needs Response 52% Ensuring access to food (staple and fresh foods) and Almost 2.9 million people were reached by Turkey-based cooking materials for an estimated 5.5 million food actors and WFP with food baskets and cooked meals in the 8 5,543,979 insecure people is the primary priority.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Offensive Against the Syrian City of Manbij May Be the Beginning of a Campaign to Liberate the Area Near the Syrian-Turkish Border from ISIS
    June 23, 2016 Offensive against the Syrian City of Manbij May Be the Beginning of a Campaign to Liberate the Area near the Syrian-Turkish Border from ISIS Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) fighters at the western entrance to the city of Manbij (Fars, June 18, 2016). Overview 1. On May 31, 2016, the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), a Kurdish-dominated military alliance supported by the United States, initiated a campaign to liberate the northern Syrian city of Manbij from ISIS. Manbij lies west of the Euphrates, about 35 kilometers (about 22 miles) south of the Syrian-Turkish border. In the three weeks since the offensive began, the SDF forces, which number several thousand, captured the rural regions around Manbij, encircled the city and invaded it. According to reports, on June 19, 2016, an SDF force entered Manbij and occupied one of the key squares at the western entrance to the city. 2. The declared objective of the ground offensive is to occupy Manbij. However, the objective of the entire campaign may be to liberate the cities of Manbij, Jarabulus, Al-Bab and Al-Rai, which lie to the west of the Euphrates and are ISIS strongholds near the Turkish border. For ISIS, the loss of the area is liable to be a severe blow to its logistic links between the outside world and the centers of its control in eastern Syria (Al-Raqqah), Iraq (Mosul). Moreover, the loss of the region will further 112-16 112-16 2 2 weaken ISIS's standing in northern Syria and strengthen the military-political position and image of the Kurdish forces leading the anti-ISIS ground offensive.
    [Show full text]
  • Policy Notes for the Trump Notes Administration the Washington Institute for Near East Policy ■ 2018 ■ Pn55
    TRANSITION 2017 POLICYPOLICY NOTES FOR THE TRUMP NOTES ADMINISTRATION THE WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY ■ 2018 ■ PN55 TUNISIAN FOREIGN FIGHTERS IN IRAQ AND SYRIA AARON Y. ZELIN Tunisia should really open its embassy in Raqqa, not Damascus. That’s where its people are. —ABU KHALED, AN ISLAMIC STATE SPY1 THE PAST FEW YEARS have seen rising interest in foreign fighting as a general phenomenon and in fighters joining jihadist groups in particular. Tunisians figure disproportionately among the foreign jihadist cohort, yet their ubiquity is somewhat confounding. Why Tunisians? This study aims to bring clarity to this question by examining Tunisia’s foreign fighter networks mobilized to Syria and Iraq since 2011, when insurgencies shook those two countries amid the broader Arab Spring uprisings. ©2018 THE WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. THE WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY ■ NO. 30 ■ JANUARY 2017 AARON Y. ZELIN Along with seeking to determine what motivated Evolution of Tunisian Participation these individuals, it endeavors to reconcile estimated in the Iraq Jihad numbers of Tunisians who actually traveled, who were killed in theater, and who returned home. The find- Although the involvement of Tunisians in foreign jihad ings are based on a wide range of sources in multiple campaigns predates the 2003 Iraq war, that conflict languages as well as data sets created by the author inspired a new generation of recruits whose effects since 2011. Another way of framing the discussion will lasted into the aftermath of the Tunisian revolution. center on Tunisians who participated in the jihad fol- These individuals fought in groups such as Abu Musab lowing the 2003 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • BREAD and BAKERY DASHBOARD Northwest Syria Bread and Bakery Assistance 12 MARCH 2021
    BREAD AND BAKERY DASHBOARD Northwest Syria Bread and Bakery Assistance 12 MARCH 2021 ISSUE #7 • PAGE 1 Reporting Period: DECEMBER 2020 Lower Shyookh Turkey Turkey Ain Al Arab Raju 92% 100% Jarablus Syrian Arab Sharan Republic Bulbul 100% Jarablus Lebanon Iraq 100% 100% Ghandorah Suran Jordan A'zaz 100% 53% 100% 55% Aghtrin Ar-Ra'ee Ma'btali 52% 100% Afrin A'zaz Mare' 100% of the Population Sheikh Menbij El-Hadid 37% 52% in NWS (including Tell 85% Tall Refaat A'rima Abiad district) don’t meet the Afrin 76% minimum daily need of bread Jandairis Abu Qalqal based on the 5Ws data. Nabul Al Bab Al Bab Ain al Arab Turkey Daret Azza Haritan Tadaf Tell Abiad 59% Harim 71% 100% Aleppo Rasm Haram 73% Qourqeena Dana AleppoEl-Imam Suluk Jebel Saman Kafr 50% Eastern Tell Abiad 100% Takharim Atareb 73% Kwaires Ain Al Ar-Raqqa Salqin 52% Dayr Hafir Menbij Maaret Arab Harim Tamsrin Sarin 100% Ar-Raqqa 71% 56% 25% Ein Issa Jebel Saman As-Safira Maskana 45% Armanaz Teftnaz Ar-Raqqa Zarbah Hadher Ar-Raqqa 73% Al-Khafsa Banan 0 7.5 15 30 Km Darkosh Bennsh Janudiyeh 57% 36% Idleb 100% % Bread Production vs Population # of Total Bread / Flour Sarmin As-Safira Minimum Needs of Bread Q4 2020* Beneficiaries Assisted Idleb including WFP Programmes 76% Jisr-Ash-Shugur Ariha Hajeb in December 2020 0 - 99 % Mhambal Saraqab 1 - 50,000 77% 61% Tall Ed-daman 50,001 - 100,000 Badama 72% Equal or More than 100% 100,001 - 200,000 Jisr-Ash-Shugur Idleb Ariha Abul Thohur Monthly Bread Production in MT More than 200,000 81% Khanaser Q4 2020 Ehsem Not reported to 4W’s 1 cm 3720 MT Subsidized Bread Al Ma'ra Data Source: FSL Cluster & iMMAP *The represented percentages in circles on the map refer to the availability of bread by calculating Unsubsidized Bread** Disclaimer: The Boundaries and names shown Ma'arrat 0.50 cm 1860 MT the gap between currently produced bread and bread needs of the population at sub-district level.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fall of Dabiq and the Fall of the Caliphate
    0 The fall of Dabiq and the fall of the Caliphate Shaul Shay October 2016 Dabiq, which lies about 10km from the border with Turkey, features in Islamic apocalyptic prophecies as the site of an end-of-times showdown between Muslims and their "Roman" enemies based on a hadith. The Prophet Muhammad is believed to have said that "the last hour will not come" until Muslims vanquished the Romans at "Dabiq or al-Amaq" - both in the Syria-Turkey border region - on their way to conquer Constantinople (Istanbul).1 But in October 2016, the fall of Dabiq did not start the apocalypse but the countdown to the end of the Islamic state. Operation "Euphrates Shield" - The attack on Dabiq ISIS fighters fancied themselves as the true Muslims, and the Turkish-backed rebel forces as the infidels. But fears that the thousand-or-so jihadi fighters holed up in Dabiq would fight to the death were quelled, as the militants simply took to their heels and ran, leaving the Free Syrian Army to walk in without much of a battle.2 In the operation's early weeks, Jarabulus and Al-Rai became the first two major settlements to be captured from the ISIS. The attack on Dabiq started on October 15, 2016. Rebels have also taken the villages of Irshaf and Ghaitun, which would cut off Dabiq and another large village, Soran – all in preparation for a ground offensive on the two areas. ISIS had been sending reinforcements into Dabiq over the past weeks, including one of their most elite units, known as Jaish al-Isra, which arrived in recent days3.
    [Show full text]
  • 安全理事会 Distr.: General 25 February 2015 Chinese Original: English
    联合国 S/2015/138 安全理事会 Distr.: General 25 February 2015 Chinese Original: English 2015 年 2 月 25 日秘书长给安全理事会主席的信 谨随函转递禁止化学武器组织(禁化武组织)总干事根据安全理事会第 2118(2013)号决议第 12 段提交的第十七次月度报告(见附件)。该报告所述期间为 2015 年 1 月 23 日至 2 月 22 日。 我欣慰地注意到，叙利亚阿拉伯共和国境内剩余的 12 个化学武器生产设施 的销毁工作正在继续，第一个和第二个地下结构的销毁现已得到禁止化学武器组 织核实。 关于阿拉伯叙利亚共和国的初次申报和随后的修正，禁化武组织技术专家正 在继续与叙利亚当局进行对话。自我上次写信(S/2015/56)以来，禁化武组织申报 评估小组对阿拉伯叙利亚共和国进行了访问，以便与叙利亚当局举行进一步协 商，并继续开展技术层面的讨论。如我此前所强调的那样，叙利亚当局与禁化武 组织之间的持续合作对于解决这方面的悬而未决的问题仍然至关重要。 阁下知道，2015 年 2 月 4 日我收到禁化武组织总干事转递了执行理事会所作 决定的文函，决定涉及正在调查关于有毒化学品在阿拉伯叙利亚共和国境内被用 作武器指控的实况调查团的报告。我于 2015 年 2 月 6 日写信(S/2015/95)，向安全 理事会主席转递了这一文函。在该项决定中，执行理事会除其他外注意到总干事 表示，他将把实况调查团的报告连同执行理事会内对调查团工作的讨论情况包括 在其每月提交安全理事会的报告中。因此，谨附上迄今发布的实况调查团的三份 报告(见附件，附录二至四)。关于执行理事会的相关讨论情况见总干事定期的每 月报告。 实况调查团的工作正在继续进行。我一如既往地借此机会重申，我坚决谴责 冲突的任何一方将有毒化学品当作武器加以使用的行为。 请紧急提请安全理事会成员注意本信及其附件为荷。 潘基文(签名) 15-02871 (C) 020315 020315 *1502871* S/2015/138 附件 谨递交我题为“消除叙利亚化学武器方案一事的进展”的报告，供转递安全 理事会。我的报告是根据禁止化学武器组织执行理事会第 EC-M-33/DEC.1 号决 定的有关规定和联合国安全理事会第 2118(2013)号决议(2013 年 9 月 27 日)而拟写 的，报告期为 2015 年 1 月 23 日至 2015 年 2 月 22 日，其中还按照执行理事会第 EC-M-34/DEC.1 号决定(2013 年 11 月 15 日)的要求作了汇报。另外还随函附上了 负责查明有关氯在阿拉伯叙利亚共和国被用作武器的指称的事实真相的事实调 查组的三份报告。 阿赫迈特·尤祖姆居(签名) 2/119 15-02871 (C) S/2015/138 附录一 禁止化学武器组织总干事的说明 消除叙利亚化学武器方案一事的进展 1. 根据执行理事会(下称“执理会”)第三十三次会议的决定(EC-M-33/DEC.1， 2013 年 9 月 27 日)第 2(f)分段，技术秘书处(下称“技秘处”)应每个月向执理会 报告该决定的执行情况。根据联合国安全理事会第 2118(2013)号决议第 12 段， 技秘处的报告还将通过秘书长向安全理事会提交。本文为第 17 份此种月度报告。 2. 执理会第三十四次会议通过了题为“叙利亚化学武器和叙利亚化学武器生产 设施的具体销毁要求”的决定(EC-M-34/DEC.1，2013 年 11 月 15 日)。在该决定 第 22 段中，执理会决定技秘处应“在按执理会 EC-M-33/DEC.1 号决定第 2(f)分 段的规定提出报告的同时”，报告决定的执行情况。 3. 执理会第四十八次会议还通过了题为“禁化武组织派往叙利亚的事实调查组 的报告”的决定(EC-M-48/DEC.1，2015 年 2 月 4 日)。 4.
    [Show full text]
  • NATO Exposed As ISIS Springboard Into Syria
    NATO Exposed as ISIS Springboard into Syria By Tony Cartalucci Region: Middle East & North Africa Global Research, June 14, 2016 Theme: Terrorism, US NATO War Agenda NEO In-depth Report: SYRIA Kurdish fighters allegedly backed by the US, have crossed the Euphrates River in Syria and have moved against fighters from the self-proclaimed “Islamic State” (ISIS) holding the city of Manbij. The city is about 20 miles from Jarabulus, another Syrian city located right on the Syrian-Turkish border. Jarabulus too is held by ISIS. The initial push toward Manbij came from the Tishrin Dam in the south, however, another front was opened up and is hooking around the city’s north – successfully cutting off the city and its ISIS defenders from roads leading to the Turkish border – including Route 216 running between Manbij and Jarabulus. Planning an assault on an urban center requires that an attacking force cut off city defenders from their logistical routes. Doing so prevents the enemy from fleeing and regrouping, but also diminishes the enemy’s fighting capacity during the assault. It is clear that the fighters moving in on ISIS in Manbij have determined that Jarabulus and Turkey just beyond the border, constitutes the source of ISIS’ fighting capacity. Western Media Admits ISIS Entering Syria From Turkey Jarabulus is increasingly being referred to across the Western media as the “last ISIS border- crossing point into Turkey.” A 2015 article written by the Guardian’s Jonathan Steele titled, “The Syrian Kurds Are Winning!,” would explain that (emphasis added): In July of this year the YPG, again with the aid of US airpower, drove ISIS out of Tal Abyad, another town on the border with Turkey.
    [Show full text]
  • The U.S. Administration's Policy in Iraq
    Viewpoints No. 106 Turkish Troops Enter Syria to Fight ISIS, May also Target U.S.-Backed Kurdish Militia Amberin Zaman Public Policy Fellow, Woodrow Wilson Center; Columnist, Diken.com.tr and Al-Monitor Pulse of the Middle East August 2016 Backed by the U.S.-led coalition, Turkish troops entered Syria for the time to take on the Islamic State. This signals a move that could have wide-ranging effects on U.S.-Turkish relations and on Syria’s Kurds. Middle East Program ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Backed by U.S. airpower, Turkish military forces swept into northwestern Syria in the early hours of August 24, marking a dramatic new turn in the campaign against jihadists of the so- called Islamic State (ISIS) in Syria. The push, involving Turkish special forces and assorted Syrian rebels, raised alarm bells among the main U.S. ally in Syria, the Kurdish People’s Protection Units (YPG), and prompted harsh warnings from Damascus over the breach of its territorial sovereignty. The operation, called “Euphrates Shield,” is meant to dislodge ISIS from the strategic border town of Jarabulus and to preempt any YPG moves to get there first. Coming just hours ahead of U.S. Vice President Joe Biden’s fence-mending visit to Ankara, the attack marks the first time Turkish troops have crossed into Syria for offensive action against ISIS, and, potentially, the YPG. In a series of Tweets, Turkish presidential spokesman Ibrahim Kalin made Turkey’s intentions clear: “The Jarabulus operation’s purpose is to expunge our borders of all terrorist threats including ISIS and the YPG,” Kalin wrote.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the Publication
    Viewpoints No. 99 Mission Impossible? Triangulating U.S.- Turkish Relations with Syria’s Kurds Amberin Zaman Public Policy Fellow, Woodrow Wilson Center; Columnist, Diken.com.tr and Al-Monitor Pulse of the Middle East April 2016 The United States is trying to address Turkish concerns over its alliance with a Syrian Kurdish militia against the Islamic State. Striking a balance between a key NATO ally and a non-state actor is growing more and more difficult. Middle East Program ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ On April 7 Syrian opposition rebels backed by airpower from the U.S.-led Coalition against the Islamic State (ISIS) declared that they had wrested Al Rai, a strategic hub on the Turkish border from the jihadists. They hailed their victory as the harbinger of a new era of rebel cooperation with the United States against ISIS in the 98-kilometer strip of territory bordering Turkey that remains under the jihadists’ control. Their euphoria proved short-lived: On April 11 it emerged that ISIS had regained control of Al Rai and the rest of the areas the rebels had conquered in the past week. Details of what happened remain sketchy because poor weather conditions marred visibility. But it was still enough for Coalition officials to describe the reversal as a “total collapse.” The Al Rai fiasco is more than just a battleground defeat against the jihadists. It’s a further example of how Turkey’s conflicting goals with Washington are hampering the campaign against ISIS. For more than 18 months the Coalition has been striving to uproot ISIS from the 98- kilometer chunk of the Syrian-Turkish border that is generically referred to the “Manbij Pocket” or the Marea-Jarabulus line.
    [Show full text]
  • L:>Rs(Olf/Vof
    ORGANISATION FOR THE PROHIBITION OF CHEMICAL WEAPONS Dirutor-Ctntral OPCW The lf<lgue, 18 December 2014 ?014 OEC 2 3 Johan de \V ittl.>"n 31 1./()!)(Jill)5480/14 I q--- II 8 J--i 2517 JR The Ha)!U< !:....... ...��4._�·; i/� ..,.. !.: t l t•l;_ �� Tht' Nethnbnds o:F 'i llc ;,t.Q.l;J:.:ut)'.GE.NERAI. Tdcphone:+ 31(0)704103702/o-t ht: + 31 (o)jo 410 37 91. E-mail: ahmct.uzumcu(t!)opcw.urg Excellency, I have the honour to transmit to you the Third Report of the Organisation t()r the Prohibition of I Chemical Weapons Fact-Finding Mission in Syria. As you know the Mission was mandated to J I establish the !acts surrounding allegations of the usc of toxic chemicals, reportedly chlorine, f()r I hostile purposes in the Syrian Arab Republic. I This repoti will be circulated today in ·nlC I !ague to States Parties to the Chemical Weapons Convention. IIY. Mr Ban K i-tn0l)l1 Sccrdary-Gcncral ol"the United Nations United Nations llcadquartcrs New York l:>rs(olf/vof ORGANISATION FOR THE PROHIBITION OF CHEMICAL WEAPONS Dirutor-General OPCW The Hague, 18 December 2014 Johan de Witdaan 32 1./0DG/195480/14 2517 )R The Hague The Netherlands Telephone: + 31 ( o )70 416 37 02/04 Fax:+ 31 (0)70 416 37 92 E-mail: [email protected] Excellency, I have the honour to transmit to you the Third Report of the Organisation for the Prohibiti on of Chemical Weapons Fact-Finding Mission in Syria.
    [Show full text]
  • September 2016
    www.rbs0.com/syria37.pdf 1 Oct 2016 Page 1 of 234 Syria & Iraq: September 2016 Copyright 2016 by Ronald B. Standler No copyright claimed for quotations. No copyright claimed for works of the U.S. Government. Table of Contents 1. Chemical Weapons U.N. Security Council begins to ask who used chemical weapons in Syria? ISIL used mustard in Iraq (11 Aug 2015) 2. Syria United Nations Diverted from Syria death toll in Syria now over 301,000 (30 Sep) Free Syrian Army is Leaderless since June 2015 Turkey is an ally from Hell U.S. troops in Syria Recognition that Assad is Winning the Civil War Peace Negotiations for Syria Future of Assad must be decided by Syrians Planning for Peace Negotiations in Geneva New Russia/USA Agreements (9 Sep) U.N. Security Council meeting (21 Sep) Syrian speech to U.N. General Assembly (24 Sep) more meetings and negotiations 22-30 Sep 2016 Friends of Syria meeting in London (7 Sep) ISSG meetings (20, 22 Sep 2016) occasional reports of violations of the Cessation of Hostilities agreement proposed 48-hour ceasefires in Aleppo siege of Aleppo (1-12 Sep} Violations of new agreements in Syria (12-19 Sep) continuing civil war in Syria (20-30 Sep) bombing hospitals in Syria surrender of Moadamiyeh U.N. Reports war crimes prosecution? 3. Iraq Atrocities in Iraq No Criminal Prosecution of Iraqi Army Officers No Prosecution for Fall of Mosul No Prosecution for Rout at Ramadi No Criminal Prosecution for Employing "Ghost Soldiers" www.rbs0.com/syria37.pdf 1 Oct 2016 Page 2 of 234 Iraq is a failed nation U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights Violations in Syria
    Helpdesk Report International humanitarian law and human rights violations in Syria Iffat Idris GSDRC, University of Birmingham 5 June 2017 Question Provide a brief overview of the current situation with regard to international humanitarian law and human rights violations in Syria. Contents 1. Overview 2. Syrian government and Russia 3. Armed Syrian opposition (including extremist) groups 4. Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) 5. Kurdish People’s Protection Units (YPG) 6. International coalition 7. References The K4D helpdesk service provides brief summaries of current research, evidence, and lessons learned. Helpdesk reports are not rigorous or systematic reviews; they are intended to provide an introduction to the most important evidence related to a research question. They draw on a rapid desk-based review of published literature and consultation with subject specialists. Helpdesk reports are commissioned by the UK Department for International Development and other Government departments, but the views and opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect those of DFID, the UK Government, K4D or any other contributing organisation. For further information, please contact [email protected]. 1. Overview All parties involved in the Syrian conflict have carried out extensive violations of international humanitarian law and human rights. In particular, all parties are guilty of targeting civilians. Rape and sexual violence have been widely used as a weapon of war, notably by the government, ISIL1 and extremist groups. The Syrian government and its Russian allies have used indiscriminate weapons, notably barrel bombs and cluster munitions, against civilians, and have deliberately targeted medical facilities and schools, as well as humanitarian personnel and humanitarian objects.
    [Show full text]
  • Weekly Conflict Summary
    Weekly Conflict Summary September 14-20, 2017 During the reporting period, pro-government forces and Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF, a Kurdish-led coalition backed by the US) both advanced around the ISIS-held city of Deir Ezzor, leading to a sharp increase in tension between the two as they maneuver close to one another. ISIS-held territory in Raqqa city continued to fall to SDF advances the reporting week and pro-government forces advanced against the group in eastern Homs/eastern Hama as well. Hai’yat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS, formerly Al-Qaeda-linked Jabhat al-Nusra) started another offensive for the northern countryside of Hama, to no real effect. A string of assassinations within Idleb targeted members of HTS. HTS formed an interim governing body to compete with the Syrian opposition’s Interim Government and a coalition of opposition forces expressed their discontent with the Astana process. Units in southern Syria have continued to develop their local police work and are aiding attempts to strengthen the Syrian opposition’s Interim Government that HTS opposes. Figure 1 - Areas of control in Syria by September 20, with arrows indicating advances since the start of the reporting period 1 of 6 Weekly Conflict Summary – September 09-14, 2017 Conflict around Deir Ezzor In the last two weeks, pro-government forces broke the ISIS siege around Deir Ezzor city, the offensive force has worked to expand its control over the city and surrounding area. This week, pro-government forces drove back ISIS fighters at least 10-15 km from the Deir Ezzor Military Airport, from which combat missions have been launched since.
    [Show full text]