Research Report 7/2013

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Research Report 7/2013 Research Report 7/2013 Minimum wages and their role in the process and incentives to bargain John Buchanan, Tanya Bretherton, Betty Frino, Michelle Jakubauskas, Johanna Schutz, Garima Verma, Serena Yu Workplace Research Centre, University of Sydney Business School December 2013 The contents of this paper are the responsibility of the author and the research has been conducted without the involvement of members of the Fair Work Commission. ISBN 978-0-9874935-5-2 © Commonwealth of Australia 2013 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, all other rights are reserved. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to: Diana Lloyd, Manager, Media and Communications GPO Box 1994 Melbourne VIC 3001 Phone: 03 8661 7680 Email: [email protected] All research undertaken by or commissioned by the Fair Work Commission for the Annual Wage Review 2013–2014 has been agreed by the Research Group. The Research Group comprises a Chair from the Workplace and Economic Research Section, Tribunal Services Branch of the Fair Work Commission, and representatives nominated by: Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry (ACCI); Australian Industry Group (Ai Group); Australian Council of Social Service (ACOSS); Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU); Australian Government; and state and territory governments. This paper is the work of John Buchanan, Tanya Bretherton, Betty Frino, Michelle Jakubauskas, Johanna Schutz, Garima Verma and Serena Yu of the Workplace Research Centre, University of Sydney, Business School. A draft of this paper was workshopped with the Research Group prior to finalisation. The authors would also like to thank the Research Group for its comments. The contents of this research paper remain the responsibility of the authors. Acknowledgement This report has been several years in the making and involved many, many people. This acknowledgement gives recognition to only the most obvious contributors. This report is based on extensive new empirical material, most of which was provided freely by employers and employees. Over the last 20 years it has become increasingly difficult to gain access to workplaces because people are just so busy. While practitioners want to share information, most simply cannot fit this extra demand into tight work schedules. In undertaking this project the research team had the very positive experience of finding that most organisations and individuals approached to participate willingly accepted. This outcome was primarily made possible by the very active support provided by key experts, especially those in employer organisations and unions, who helped to clarify the key issues to explore and the key sites to approach. This support was greatly appreciated by the research team. This support was matched by the high response by employers to the Award Reliance Survey in Australian organisations. Full details about this cooperation and the report it helped produce are provided in the companion research report to this study titled Award reliance.1 Moreover, in keeping with the high level of goodwill associated with the information sharing surrounding this project, the federal Department of Employment (formerly part of the Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR)) made information on its Workplace Agreements Database desired by the research team available as soon as it was needed. If there are problems with this report they do not arise from a lack of access to information—the research team got the information it needed. The project team would also like to thank Fair Work Commission staff for their assistance, in particular Miranda Pointon, Samantha Farmakis-Gamboni, Kim Rusling and Joelle Leggett. Miranda Pointon in particular devoted extensive attention to negotiating the original contract and engaged very actively during the initial project scoping stage. This group greatly assisted ensuring a very tight and robust product has been produced. Within the research team at the Workplace Research Centre (WRC), many people contributed a huge amount of time and expertise. Justine Evesson drove the development of the original project proposal and the first round of project scoping. Her initial research identified the importance of undertaking workplace case studies on the basis of ‘like for like’ comparisons. This provided the discipline for the entire research design underpinning this project. Toby Fattore conducted follow- up scoping work on identifying industries for potential inclusion and exclusion. Sarah Oxenbridge undertook the initial specification of field work procedures, including production of a detailed ‘workplace case studies guide book’. The agreements analysis component of this project was only possible because of the very active support of DEEWR personnel, especially Sue Devereux and Phil Swinton—custodians of the Workplace Agreements Database at the time. The selection of agreements for qualitative analysis was guided by experts within employer associations and unions. All those approached for assistance gave their time generously. The qualitative analysis of agreements was undertaken by Betty Frino, Michelle Jakubauskas and Johanna Schutz of WRC. Their work on relativities broke new ground in how data on enterprise agreements can shed important new light on wage determination in contemporary Australia. The quantitative analysis of agreements was driven by 1 Wright S and Buchanan J (2013) Award reliance, Research Report 6/2013, Fair Work Commission, December, Melbourne. Serena Yu. Serena, together with Garima Verma, made major contributions to the presentation of the findings concerning relativities. Extensive assistance with drafting and improving the analytical coherence in the quantitative study of agreements was provided by Damian Oliver. The workplace case studies were prepared by a team including Johanna Schutz, Michelle Jakubauskas, Betty Frino and Tanya Bretherton. Assistance with editing these was provided by Damian Oliver and Rose Ryan. Tanya conducted the heavy lifting to generate a sensitive narrative out of the very rich empirical material contained in Section 2.4. The original statistical material on the incidence and nature of different wage arrangements within organisations and across the labour market was prepared by the team that undertook the Award Reliance Survey. The project manager and prime researcher on this study was Sally Wright. She was assisted by a range of staff at the WRC and the experts at ORC International, especially Phil Hughes, Kerry Sproston, Danielle Belleville and John Nielsen. Full details of all the people involved in that study are provided in the report on that project. A number of staff within the WRC have helped with formatting and copy editing the report. This has included Cate Murray, Rebecca Fielding and Stacey Young. In the later stages of the project Garima Verma worked tirelessly and with good humour to tighten up drafting, and ensure consistency in presentation and formatting. She also contributed to the analytical coherence of the final product. The final acknowledgement needs to go to the Fair Work Commission itself. This is a body that has, in one form or another, existed for over 100 years. Its research program is exemplary in providing evidence to help it better execute its very important but difficult work. Without its funding and support this project would not have happened. I have been involved through all stages of the project—from proposal development, scoping, all stages of field work, data analysis and report finalisation. It’s been a privilege and pleasure to work with such a great team of researchers and to be the recipient of so much goodwill from those with such important information to share. Professor John Buchanan Director Workplace Research Centre University of Sydney Business School December 2013 Minimum wages and their role in the process and incentive to bargain Table of Contents List of Abbreviations and Glossary .......................................................................................... i Executive Summary ................................................................................................................. iv Research Questions, Terminology and Methods.................................................................... 1 Research questions ............................................................................................................................... 2 Annual wage review decisions and wage outcomes ..................................................................... 2 Annual wage review decisions and bargaining behaviours ........................................................... 2 Terminology ........................................................................................................................................... 2 Awards and agreements: formally mutually exclusive categories, in reality often intimately connected ....................................................................................................................... 5 Bargaining and agreement making: not necessarily the same thing ............................................. 5 Formal wages policy decisions need not necessarily have any impact on substantive outcomes ........................................................................................................................ 6 Research design ...................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Stepping Up, Stepping Back
    Stepping Up Stepping Back W o m e n A c t i v i s t s “ t A l k U n i o n ” A c r o s s G e n e r A t i o n s “AFter listeninG to All these Women, i want to mAke more oF A difference.” C on t en ts 2 introduction 3 summary: Unions at a tipping Point 5 report: stepping Up, stepping Back 7 terry o’neill: time to Build coalitions 8 mandie Yanasak: Union and a raise 11 liz shuler: labor movement needs Young leaders m-art.us Design: 12 Gladys cisneros: international solidarity 12 recommendations 16 Blueprint: creating a safe space 19 Further reading 20 Participants A M essage from the T rustees of the B erger -M ar kS Foundation In March 2010, the Berger-Marks Foundation invited 30 women activists to New Orleans for a candid conversation across generations about how unions can attract young workers, especially women, and support them in key leadership roles. Out of frank discussions over two days comes this report, “Stepping Up, Stepping Back: Women Activists ‘Talk Union’ Across Generations” by Linda Foley, Foundation president. In it, problems are faced openly and solutions are suggested. Its content comes from work done in small groups, which separated into three age clusters, and plenary sessions. As Foundation trustees, we took notes as silent observers. We hope that unions will find this report useful and that it will contribute to academic research on intergenerational activism. What happened at this 2010 New Orleans summit was a true connection, a sense of genuine community (especially among the under-age-35 participants), and an awareness of shared values across generations despite differences and tensions.
    [Show full text]
  • Trade Unions, Workers' Rights and the Frontier of Control in UK Call Centres Philip Taylor University of Stirling Peter Bain University of Strathclyde
    Trade Unions, Workers' Rights and the Frontier of Control in UK Call Centres Philip Taylor University of Stirling Peter Bain University of Strathclyde In developing a model of call centre diversity, spanning the dimensions of quantity and quality, the article develops a critique of aspects of Frenkel et al.'s recent study of `front line' work. Drawing upon employee survey and interview data from six UK ®nancial sector call centres, patterns of resistance and the contrasting responses of trade unions to the experience of intensive working conditions are examined. It is argued, in conclusion, that the newly established managerial `frontiers of control' require to be combated by new union bargaining agendas which seek to address employees' concerns at the point of production. Keywords: call centres, control, ®nance sector, resistance, trade unions Introduction Employment in call centres in the European Union is projected to grow to 1.8 million by 2002 with over half a million, 2.3 percent of the working population, expected to be employed in UK call centres alone (Datamonitor, 1998). While the pattern across Europe is of combined and uneven development, with considerable variance in national and regional growth rates, the overall picture is of rapid expansion. As a consequence, it is no longer possible to regard call centres as economically marginal or ephemeral. Nor is there evidence to support the conjecture that the rise of the Internet Economic and Industrial Democracy & 2001 (SAGE, London, Thousand Oaks and New Delhi), Vol. 22: 39±66. [0143±831X(200102)22:1;39±66;015740] 40 Economic and Industrial Democracy 22(1) will displace the call centre (Datamonitor, 1999) as the integration of operations leads to the emergence of customer contact centres.
    [Show full text]
  • The Community College Mission: History and Theory, 1930-2000
    THE COMMUNITY COLLEGE MISSION: HISTORY AND THEORY, 1930-2000 Item Type text; Electronic Dissertation Authors Meier, Kenneth Mitchell Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 02/10/2021 03:49:52 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/194041 THE COMMUNITY COLLEGE MISSION: HISTORY AND THEORY, 1930-2000 by Kenneth M. Meier _____________________ Copyright © Kenneth M. Meier 2008 A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the CENTER FOR THE STUDY OF HIGHER EDUCATION In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2008 2 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE As members of the Dissertation Committee, we certify that we have read the dissertation prepared by Kenneth M. Meier entitled The Community College Mission: History and Theory, 1930-2000, and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy. ___________________________________________________________________________Date: November 12, 2008 Gary Rhoades, Ph.D. ___________________________________________________________________________ Date: November 12, 2008 John S. Levin, Ph.D. ___________________________________________________________________________Date: November 12, 2008 Jenny Lee, Ph.D. ___________________________________________________________________________ Date: November 12, 2008 Regina Deil-Amen, Ph.D. Final approval and acceptance of this dissertation is contingent upon the candidate’s submission of the final copies of the dissertation to the Graduate College. I hereby certify that I have read this dissertation prepared under my direction and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement.
    [Show full text]
  • Precarious Labour in the Field of Art
    01 Issue # 16/13 Freely distributed, non - commercial, digital publication PRECARIOUS LABOUR IN THE FIELD OF ART Freee, Revolution is Sublime, Billboard Poster, Peckham Space, London, 2009. CONTENTS 02 Introduction Zoran Eric´, Stevan Vukovic´ 41 Freee art collective When Work Is More than Wages 05 Andrew Ross The New Geography of Work: Power to the 46 Pascal Gielen The Art Scene. A Clever Working Model Precarious? for Economic Exploitation? 13 Anthony Davies Take Me I'm Yours: Neoliberalising 51 Marc James Léger For the De-incapacitation of the Cultural Institution Community Art Practice 19 Adrienne Goehler Basic Income Grant – The Cultural 58 Angela McRobbie "Everyone is Creative": Artists as Impulse Needed Now! New Economy Pioneers? 22 Carrotworkers' Collective On Free Labour 26 Rosalind Gill and Andy Pratt Precarity and Cultural Work In the Social Factory? Immaterial Labour, Precariousness and Cultural Work 02 Issue # 16/13 PRECARIOUS LABOUR IN THE FIELD OF ART Zoran Eric´, Stevan Vukovic´ The general shift from manufacturing to services as a source of employment has effected also the field of visual art, changing the labour market for curators. Their position in the division of labour has become closer to the one of artists, in the sense becoming much more unstable, short term, flexible, and exploited. An important aspect of the new working conditions is the demand for physical and mental mobility. This is affecting both the curators with "steady" jobs whose working places and working hours are becoming fluid, and even more so the freelance curators who offer their services to a free (art) labour market.
    [Show full text]