DOCSLIB.ORG

Featured Topic Social & Behavioral Science Interventions at the Federal Level in This Issue Nudging People to Get Flu Vaccinations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Featured Topic Social & Behavioral Science Interventions at the Federal Level in This Issue Nudging People to Get Flu Vaccinations a publication of the behavioral science & policy association volume 2 issue 2 2016 featured topic social & behavioral science interventions at the federal level in this issue Nudging people to get flu vaccinations behavioralpolicy.org founding co-editors disciplinary editors Craig R. Fox (UCLA) Behavioral Economics Sim B Sitkin (Duke University) Senior Disciplinary Editor Dean S. Karlan (Yale University) bspa executive director Associate Disciplinary Editors Oren Bar-Gill (Harvard University) Colin F. Camerer (California Institute ofTechnology) Kate B.B. Wessels M. Keith Chen (UCLA) advisory board Julian Jamison (World Bank) Paul Brest (Stanford University) Russell B. Korobkin (UCLA) David Brooks (New York Times) Devin G. Pope (University of Chicago) John Seely Brown (Deloitte) Jonathan Zinman (Dartmouth College) Robert B. Cialdini (Arizona State University) Adam M. Grant (University of Pennsylvania) Cognitive & Brain Science Daniel Kahneman (Princeton University) Senior Disciplinary Editor Henry L. Roediger III (Washington University) James G. March (Stanford University) Associate Disciplinary Editors Yadin Dudai (Weizmann Institute & NYU) Jeffrey Pfeffer (Stanford University) Roberta L. Klatzky (Carnegie Mellon University) Denise M. Rousseau (Carnegie Mellon University) Hal Pashler (UC San Diego) Paul Slovic (University of Oregon) Steven E. Petersen (Washington University) Cass R. Sunstein (Harvard University) Jeremy M. Wolfe (Harvard University) Richard H. Thaler (University of Chicago) Decision, Marketing, & Management Sciences executive committee Senior Disciplinary Editor Eric J. Johnson (Columbia University) Associate Disciplinary Editors Linda C. Babcock (Carnegie Mellon University) Morela Hernandez (University of Virginia) Max H. Bazerman (Harvard University) Katherine L. Milkman (University of Pennsylvania) Baruch Fischhoff (Carnegie Mellon University) Daniel Oppenheimer (UCLA) John G. Lynch (University of Colorado) Todd Rogers (Harvard University) John W. Payne (Duke University) David Schkade (UC San Diego) Ellen Peters (Ohio State University) Joe Simmons (University of Pennsylvania) John D. Sterman (MIT) bspa team George Wu (University of Chicago) Kaye N. de Kruif, Managing Editor (Duke University) Organizational Science Carsten Erner, Statistical Consultant (UCLA) Senior Disciplinary Editors Carrie R. Leana (University of Pittsburgh) Lea Lupkin, Media Manager Jone L. Pearce (UC Irvine) A. David Nussbaum, Director of Communications (Chicago) Associate Disciplinary Editors Stephen R. Barley (Stanford University) Daniel J. Walters, Financial Consultant (UCLA) Rebecca M. Henderson (Harvard University) M. A. Woodbury, Editorial Director Thomas A. Kochan (MIT) consulting editors Ellen E. Kossek (Purdue University) Elizabeth W. Morrison (NYU) Dan Ariely (Duke University) William Ocasio (Northwestern University) Shlomo Benartzi (UCLA) Sara L. Rynes-Weller (University of Iowa) Laura L. Carstensen (Stanford University) Andrew H. Van de Ven (University of Minnesota) Susan T. Fiske (Princeton University) Social Psychology Chip Heath (Stanford University) Senior Disciplinary Editor Nicholas Epley (University of Chicago) David I. Laibson (Harvard University) Associate Disciplinary Editors Dolores Albarracín (University of Illinois) George Loewenstein (Carnegie Mellon University) Susan M. Andersen (NYU) Richard E. Nisbett (University of Michigan) Thomas N. Bradbury (UCLA) M. Scott Poole (University of Illinois) John F. Dovidio (Yale University) Eldar Shafir (Princeton University) David A. Dunning (Cornell University) senior policy editor E. Tory Higgins (Columbia University) Carol L. Graham (Brookings Institution) John M. Levine (University of Pittsburgh) Harry T. Reis (University of Rochester) policy editors Tom R. Tyler (Yale University) Henry J. Aaron (Brookings Institution) Sociology Matthew D. Adler (Duke University) Senior Disciplinary Editors Peter S. Bearman (Columbia University) Peter Cappelli (University of Pennsylvania) Karen S. Cook (Stanford University) Thomas D’Aunno (NYU) Associate Disciplinary Editors Paula England (NYU) J.R. DeShazo (UCLA) Peter Hedstrom (Oxford University) Brian Gill (Mathematica) Arne L. Kalleberg (University of North Carolina) Ross A. Hammond (Brookings Institution) James Moody (Duke University) Ron Haskins (Brookings Institution) Robert J. Sampson (Harvard University) Arie Kapteyn (University of Southern California) Bruce Western (Harvard University) John R. Kimberly (University of Pennsylvania) Mark Lubell (UC Davis) Annamaria Lusardi (George Washington University) Timothy H. Profeta (Duke University) Donald A. Redelmeier (University of Toronto) Rick K. Wilson (Rice University) Kathryn Zeiler (Boston University) Copyright © 2016 Behavioral Science & Policy is Authorization to photocopy Copyright Clearance Center, general distribution, or for Behavioral Science & Policy a publication of the Behavioral items for internal or personal 222 Rosewood Drive, creating new collective works, Association Science & Policy Association, use or the internal or personal Danvers, MA 01923. For more or for sale. Specific written Brookings Institution P.O. Box 51336, Durham, NC use of specific clients is granted information, please contact, permission for other copying 27717-1336, and is published by the Brookings Institution CCC, at +1 978-750-8400 and must be obtained from the ISSN xxxx-xxxx (print) twice yearly with the Brookings for libraries and other users online at www.copyright.com Permissions Department, ISSN xxxx-xxxx (online) Institution, 1775 Massachusetts registered with the Copyright Brookings Institution Press, ISBN xxx-x-xxxx-xxxx-x (pbk) Avenue, NW, Washington Clearance Center Transactional This Authorization does not 1775 Massachusetts Avenue, NW ISBN xxx-x-xxxx-xxxx-x (epub) DC 20036, and through the Reporting Service, provided that extend to other kinds of Washington, DC, 20036; e-mail: Brookings Institution Press. the basic fee is paid to the copying, such as copying for [email protected]. Behavioral Science & Policy Volume 2 Issue 2 2016 ii Editor’s note Sim B Sitkin & Craig R. Fox Features 1 11 Essay Proposal Applying behavioral sciences in the service Identity traps: of four major economic problems How to think about race & policing Jason Furman Phillip Atiba Goff 25 41 Review Finding Using identity-based motivation to improve Default clinic appointments promote the nation’s health without breaking the bank influenza vaccination uptake without a Neil A. Lewis, Jr., & Daphna Oyserman displacement effect Gretchen B. Chapman, Meng Li, Howard 53 Leventhal, & Elaine A. Leventhal Report Nudging by government: Progress, impact, & lessons learned David Halpern & Michael Sanders The White House Social and Behavioral Sciences Team Papers 67 79 Report Report Using organizational science research to Combating biased decisionmaking & address U.S. federal agencies’ management & promoting justice & equal treatment labor needs Sunita Sah, David Tannenbaum, Hayley Cleary, Herman Aguinis, Gerald F. Davis, James R. Yuval Feldman, Jack Glaser, Amy Lerman, Detert, Mary Ann Glynn, Susan E. Jackson, Robert MacCoun, Edward Maguire, Paul Slovic, Tom Kochan, Ellen Ernst Kossek, Carrie Leana, Barbara Spellman, Cassia Spohn & Christopher Thomas W. Lee, Elizabeth Morrison, Jone Winship Pearce, Jeffrey Pfeffer, Denise Rousseau & Kathleen M. Sutcliffe 88 Editorial policy editors’ note elcome to Volume 2, Issue 2 of Michael Sanders and David Halpern report on Behavioral Science & Policy (BSP). the UK’s Behavioural Insights Team’s extensive WThis is this first of two issues that will experience conducting policy field experiments showcase behavioral insights at the federal level. and helping to build behavioral science networks around the world. They offer guidelines for other We begin with the first two papers from Behavioral behavioral policy units, some of which may Science & Policy Association’s (BSPA) working seem natural (for example, do small pre-tests groups whose mission was to identify promising and observational studies before launching large- new applications of behavioral insights for federal scale field experiments) and several of which are policymakers. These groups were organized to less obvious (for example, start by running multi- inform the work of the White House Social and variable trials to find an effect before running Behavioral Science Team. In addition, this issue targeted studies to isolate what causes the contains articles on applying behavioral insights effects). The authors conclude by characterizing to macroeconomic policy and it takes stock the growth and impact of behavioral science- of lessons learned by the British Behavioural based policy initiatives around the world. Insights Team from their experience conducting policy experiments. Other papers in this issue In this issue we are also pleased to offer the first two address a wide range of policy issues from voting reports to emerge from an initiative of the BSPA in to policing to health. support of the White House Social and Behavioral Science Team. We commissioned working groups With his perspective as Chairman of the US to examine promising opportunities for the social Council of Economic Advisers, Jason Furman and behavioral sciences to inform new policies observes that the impact of behavioral science and policy experiments that can help the federal on public policy has been limited by the government serve the public interest in various traditional approach of starting with behavioral policy areas. tools and looking
Load more

Recommended publications
  • When Does Behavioural Economics Really Matter?
    When does behavioural economics really matter? Ian McAuley, University of Canberra and Centre for Policy Development (www.cpd.org.au) Paper to accompany presentation to Behavioural Economics stream at Australian Economic Forum, August 2010. Summary Behavioural economics integrates the formal study of psychology, including social psychology, into economics. Its empirical base helps policy makers in understanding how economic actors behave in response to incentives in market transactions and in response to policy interventions. This paper commences with a short description of how behavioural economics fits into the general discipline of economics. The next section outlines the development of behavioural economics, including its development from considerations of individual psychology into the fields of neurology, social psychology and anthropology. It covers developments in general terms; there are excellent and by now well-known detailed descriptions of the specific findings of behavioural economics. The final section examines seven contemporary public policy issues with suggestions on how behavioural economics may help develop sound policy. In some cases Australian policy advisers are already using the findings of behavioural economics to advantage. It matters most of the time In public policy there is nothing novel about behavioural economics, but for a long time it has tended to be ignored in formal texts. Like Molière’s Monsieur Jourdain who was surprised to find he had been speaking prose all his life, economists have long been guided by implicit knowledge of behavioural economics, particularly in macroeconomics. Keynes, for example, understood perfectly the “money illusion” – people’s tendency to think of money in nominal rather than real terms – in his solution to unemployment.
    [Show full text]
  • Price Competition with Satisficing Consumers
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Aberdeen University Research Archive Price Competition with Satisficing Consumers∗ Mauro Papiy Abstract The ‘satisficing’ heuristic by Simon (1955) has recently attracted attention both theoretically and experimentally. In this paper I study a price-competition model in which the consumer is satisficing and firms can influence his aspiration price via marketing. Unlike existing models, whether a price comparison is made depends on both pricing and marketing strategies. I fully characterize the unique symmetric equilibrium by investigating the implications of satisficing on various aspects of market competition. The proposed model can help explain well-documented economic phenomena, such as the positive correla- tion between marketing and prices observed in some markets. JEL codes: C79, D03, D43. Keywords: Aspiration Price, Bounded Rationality, Price Competition, Satisficing, Search. ∗This version: August 2017. I would like to thank the Editor of this journal, two anonymous referees, Ed Hopkins, Hans Hvide, Kohei Kawamura, Ran Spiegler, the semi- nar audience at universities of Aberdeen, East Anglia, and Trento, and the participants to the 2015 OLIGO workshop (Madrid) and the 2015 Econometric Society World Congress (Montreal) for their comments. Financial support from the Aberdeen Principal's Excel- lence Fund and the Scottish Institute for Research in Economics is gratefully acknowledged. Any error is my own responsibility. yBusiness School, University of Aberdeen - Edward Wright Building, Dunbar Street, AB24 3QY, Old Aberdeen, Scotland, UK. E-mail address: [email protected]. 1 1 Introduction According to Herbert Simon (1955), in most global models of rational choice, all alternatives are eval- uated before a choice is made.
    [Show full text]
  • Behavioral Economics and Marketing in Aid of Decision Making Among the Poor
    Behavioral Economics and Marketing in Aid of Decision Making Among the Poor The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Bertrand, Marianne, Sendhil Mullainathan, and Eldar Shafir. 2006. Behavioral economics and marketing in aid of decision making among the poor. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing 25(1): 8-23. Published Version http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jppm.25.1.8 Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:2962609 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Behavioral Economics and Marketing in Aid of Decision Making Among the Poor Marianne Bertrand, Sendhil Mullainathan, and Eldar Shafir This article considers several aspects of the economic decision making of the poor from the perspective of behavioral economics, and it focuses on potential contributions from marketing. Among other things, the authors consider some relevant facets of the social and institutional environments in which the poor interact, and they review some behavioral patterns that are likely to arise in these contexts. A behaviorally more informed perspective can help make sense of what might otherwise be considered “puzzles” in the economic comportment of the poor. A behavioral analysis suggests that substantial welfare changes could result from relatively minor policy interventions, and insightful marketing may provide much needed help in the design of such interventions.
    [Show full text]
  • Sendhil Mullainathan [email protected]
    Sendhil Mullainathan [email protected] _____________________________________________________________________________________ Education HARVARD UNIVERSITY, CAMBRIDGE, MA, 1993-1998 PhD in Economics Dissertation Topic: Essays in Applied Microeconomics Advisors: Drew Fudenberg, Lawrence Katz, and Andrei Shleifer CORNELL UNIVERSITY, ITHACA, NY, 1990-1993 B.A. in Computer Science, Economics, and Mathematics, magna cum laude Fields of Interest Behavioral Economics, Poverty, Applied Econometrics, Machine Learning Professional Affiliations UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO Roman Family University Professor of Computation and Behavioral Science, January 1, 2019 to present. University Professor, Professor of Computational and Behavioral Science, and George C. Tiao Faculty Fellow, Booth School of Business, July 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018. HARVARD UNIVERSITY Robert C Waggoner Professor of Economics, 2015 to 2018. Affiliate in Computer Science, Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, July 1, 2016 to 2018. Professor of Economics, 2004 (September) to 2015. UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO Visiting Professor, Booth School of Business, 2016-17. MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Mark Hyman Jr. Career Development Associate Professor, 2002-2004 Mark Hyman Jr. Career Development Assistant Professor, 2000-2002 Assistant Professor, 1998- 2000 SELECTED AFFILIATIONS Co - Founder and Senior Scientific Director, ideas42 Research Associate, National Bureau of Economic Research Founding Member, Poverty Action Lab Member, American Academy of Arts
    [Show full text]
  • Connections in Transportation Department of Urban Studies and Planning, MIT, Spring 2015
    Behavior and Policy 11.478 Behavior and Policy: Connections in Transportation Department of Urban Studies and Planning, MIT, Spring 2015 Full Reading List Part I: Behavior and Policy in a Nutshell Class 1. Cafeteria Trays and Multiple Frameworks • Etheredge (1976) The case of the unreturned cafeteria trays: An Investigation based upon theories of motivation and human behavior Class 2. Ten Instruments for Behavioral Change • Miller and Prentice (2013) Psychological Levers of Behavior Change, Chapter 17 in Eldar Shafir, The Behavioral Foundations of Public Policy • Richard Thaler, Cass R. Sunstein: Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness, Introduction • Daniel Kahneman: Thinking, Fast and Slow, Introduction Class 3. Measurement, Tools and Technology (Emile Bruneau) • Emile Bruneau 2015 "Putting Neuroscience to Work for Peace”, Working Paper • Duflo, E., Glennerster, R., & Kremer, M. (2007). Using randomization in development economics research: A toolkit. Handbook of development economics, 4, 3895-3962. • Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of personality and social psychology, 85(2), 197. You may try the Implicit Association Test here https://implicit.harvard.edu/ • Winter Mason and Siddharth Suri (2012) Conducting Behavioural Research on Amazon’s Mech Turk, Behavior Research Method 44(1) Class 4. My Brain at the Bus Stop: EEG & Waiting • Dan Ariely and Gregory S. Berns (2010), “Neuromarketing: The Hope and Hype of Neuroimaging in Business.” Nature Reviews Neuroscience. • Li, Zelin, F. Duarte, J. Zhao, Z. Zhao (2015) My brain at the bus stop: an exploratory framework for applying EEG-based emotion detection techniques in transportation study, working paper Class 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Failures of Utility Maximization Failures Of
    2/1/2017 Failures of Utility Maximization • Choice difficulty • Too much choice • Asymmetric dominance/compromise effects Failures of Utility Maximization • Leaving money on the table • Endowment effect Behavioral Economics • Status quo bias • Faming effects Columbia University • Preference reversals Mark Dean • Random Choice 1 2 Failures of Utility Maximization Choice Difficulty • Choice difficulty • Basic Idea: People may dislike making difficult • Too much choice comparisons • Asymmetric dominance/compromise effects • • Leaving money on the table May behave in such a way as to avoid having • Endowment effect to make such comparisons • Status quo bias • Faming effects • Preference reversals • Random Choice 3 4 Example: Tversky and Shafir (1992) Example: Tversky and Shafir (1992) • 80 Subjects • 80 Subjects • Each subject filled out a questionnaire • Each subject filled out a questionnaire • Paid $1.50 for doing so • Paid $1.50 for doing so • Two treatments: • Two treatments: 25% 75% 5 6 1 2/1/2017 Example: Tversky and Shafir (1992) Example: Tversky and Shafir (1992) • 80 Subjects • Clear violation of IIA • Each subject filled out a questionnaire – If money was chosen in the ‘big’ choice set, should also should have been chosen in the • Paid $1.50 for doing so smaller choice set • Two treatments: • Interpretation: Stay with the money in order to avoid the ‘difficult choice’ between the different types of pen • Taken as an example of ‘decision avoidance’ 25% 75% 53% 47% 7 8 Failures of Utility Maximization Too Much Choice • Choice difficulty
    [Show full text]
  • Behavioral Insights from Across the Pond: How Nudging Tools from the U.K
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Boston University Institutional Repository (OpenBU) Boston University OpenBU http://open.bu.edu Theses & Dissertations Boston University Theses & Dissertations 2015 Behavioral insights from across the pond: how nudging tools from the U.K. won't help reduce obesity In the U.S. https://hdl.handle.net/2144/15717 Boston University BOSTON UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES THESIS BEHAVIORAL INSIGHTS FROM ACROSS THE POND: HOW NUDGING TOOLS FROM THE U.K. WON’T HELP REDUCE OBESITY IN THE U.S. by ALISON M. DORSI B.A., Boston University, 2015 M.A., Boston University, 2015 Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts 2015 © Copyright by ALISON M. DORSI 2015 Approved By First Reader ______________________________________________ Graham Wilson, Ph.D. Professor of Political Science Second Reader ______________________________________________ Douglas Kriner, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Political Science To my Mother and Father iv BEHAVIORAL INSIGHTS FROM ACROSS THE POND: HOW NUDGING TOOLS FROM THE U.K. WON’T HELP REDUCE OBESITY IN THE U.S. ALISON M. DORSI ABSTRACT Obesity has become a major issue in advanced societies having serious impacts on various social as well as economic levels. In addition to the personal costs of obesity leading to serious and chronic diseases, obesity projects additional burdens upon society including lack of productivity, often resulting in increased dependence on governmental benefits, as well as increasing health care costs, most of which are paid for by taxes. This phenomenon has become especially prevalent in the United States and the United Kingdom, with both countries attempting to reduce obesity levels with programs that utilize varying levels of paternalism.
    [Show full text]
  • Sendhil Mullainathan Education Fields of Interest Professional
    Sendhil Mullainathan Robert C Waggoner Professor of Economics Littauer Center M-18 Harvard University Cambridge, MA 02138 [email protected] 617 496 2720 _____________________________________________________________________________________ Education HARVARD UNIVERSITY, CAMBRIDGE, MA, 1993-1998 PhD in Economics Dissertation Topic: Essays in Applied Microeconomics Advisors: Drew Fudenberg, Lawrence Katz, and Andrei Shleifer CORNELL UNIVERSITY, ITHACA, NY, 1990-1993 B.A. in Computer Science, Economics, and Mathematics, magna cum laude Fields of Interest Behavioral Economics, Poverty, Applied Econometrics, Machine Learning Professional Affiliations HARVARD UNIVERSITY Robert C Waggoner Professor of Economics, 2015 to present. Affiliate in Computer Science, Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, July 1, 2016 to present Professor of Economics, 2004 (September) to 2015. UNVIRSITY OF CHICAGO Visiting Professor, Booth School of Business, 2016-17. MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Mark Hyman Jr. Career Development Associate Professor, 2002-2004 Mark Hyman Jr. Career Development Assistant Professor, 2000-2002 Assistant Professor, 1998- 2000 SELECTED AFFILIATIONS Co - Founder and Senior Scientific Director, ideas42 Research Associate, National Bureau of Economic Research Founding Member, Poverty Action Lab Member, American Academy of Arts and Sciences Contributing Writer, New York Times Sendhil Mullainathan __________________________________________________________________ Books Scarcity: Why Having Too Little Means So Much, joint with Eldar Shafir, 2013. New York, NY: Times Books Policy and Choice: Public Finance through the Lens of Behavioral Economics, joint with William J Congdon and Jeffrey Kling, 2011. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press Work in Progress Machine Learning and Econometrics: Prediction, Estimation and Big Data, joint with Jann Spiess, book manuscript in preparation. “Multiple Hypothesis Testing in Experiments: A Machine Learning Approach,” joint with Jens Ludwig and Jann Spiess, in preparation.
    [Show full text]
  • Applying Behavioral Science to Nonprofit Program Delivery
    RESEARCH to ACTION LAB Applying Behavioral Science to Nonprofit Program Delivery Testing a Behavioral Insights Implementation Process with Urban Alliance Justin Milner Matthew Gerken Brett Theodos JANUARY 2021 01 APPLYING BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE TO NONPROFIT PROGRAM DELIVERY NSIGHTS FROM BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE offer an opportunity for nonprofits seeking to improve their program delivery and Ioverall impact. Urban Institute collaborated with Urban Alliance, a high-performing nonprofit organization, to adapt behavioral science insights to the unique challenges of the organization. In this brief, we document our behavioral insights implementation process, or BIIP, and how we tested that approach with Urban Alliance to improve a key component of its program model. We offer this approach as a resource for other organizations looking to leverage behavioral science. INTRODUCTION Nonprofit organizations are increasingly focused on demonstrating outcomes and impact of their work, not just providing services (Liket, Rey-Garcia, and Maas 2014). The reward for showing their effectiveness is clear: government and philanthropy often target contracts and grants to the interventions most likely to deliver positive outcomes (Haskins 2018; Zhang et al. 2017). For nonprofits moving in this evidence- based direction, most of their efforts will be focused on improving the core work of their programs— better counseling services or improved education supports, for example. However, nonprofits should also consider complementary interventions to improve their work’s overall impact. Behavioral science offers a unique opportunity for nonprofits seeking to pursue this approach and improve program delivery and overall impact (Richburg-Hayes et al. 2014). Behavioral science takes a microscope to human behavior, focusing on how people make decisions and then act on those decisions.
    [Show full text]
  • Should Governments Invest More in Nudging?
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Finance Papers Wharton Faculty Research 2017 Should Governments Invest More in Nudging? Shlomo Benartzi John Beshears Katherine L. Milkman University of Pennsylvania Richard H. Thaler Maya Shankar See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/fnce_papers Part of the Finance and Financial Management Commons, and the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Benartzi, S., Beshears, J., Milkman, K. L., Thaler, R. H., Shankar, M., Tucker-Ray, W., Congdon, W. J., & Galing, S. (2017). Should Governments Invest More in Nudging?. Psychological Science, 28 (8), 1041-1055. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797617702501 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/fnce_papers/75 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Should Governments Invest More in Nudging? Abstract Governments are increasingly adopting behavioral science techniques for changing individual behavior in pursuit of policy objectives. The types of “nudge” interventions that governments are now adopting alter people’s decisions without coercion or significant changes ot economic incentives. We calculated ratios of impact to cost for nudge interventions and for traditional policy tools, such as tax incentives and other financial inducements, and we found that nudge interventions often compare favorably with traditional interventions. We conclude that nudging is a valuable approach that should be used more often in conjunction with traditional policies, but more calculations are needed to determine the relative effectiveness of nudging. Disciplines Business | Finance and Financial Management | Social and Behavioral Sciences Author(s) Shlomo Benartzi, John Beshears, Katherine L. Milkman, Richard H. Thaler, Maya Shankar, Will Tucker-Ray, William J.
    [Show full text]
  • Sendhil Mullainathan Education Fields Of
    Sendhil Mullainathan Professor of Economics Littauer Center 208 Harvard University Cambridge, MA 02138 [email protected] 617 496 2720 _____________________________________________________________________________________ Education HARVARD UNIVERSITY, CAMBRIDGE, MA, 1993-1998 PhD in Economics Dissertation Topic: Essays in Applied Microeconomics Advisors: Drew Fudenberg, Lawrence Katz, and Andrei Shleifer CORNELL UNIVERSITY, ITHACA, NY, 1990-1993 B.A. in Computer Science, Economics, and Mathematics, magna cum laude Fields of Interest Corporate Finance, Development, Economics and Psychology, and Labor Economics Professional Affiliations and Activities DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS, HARVARD UNIVERSITY Professor of Economics, 2004 (September) to present. DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS, MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Mark Hyman Jr. Career Development Associate Professor, 2002-2004 Mark Hyman Jr. Career Development Assistant Professor, 2000-2002 Assistant Professor, 1998- 2000 Courses taught: Macroeconomic Theory (required 1st year PhD course) Economics and Psychology (2nd year PhD Course) Corporate Finance (2nd year PhD Course) AFFILIATIONS Research Associate, National Bureau of Economic Research Member, Russell Sage Foundation Behavioral Economics Roundtable Founding Member, Poverty Action Lab Board Member, Bureau of Research in Economic Analysis of Development Senior Advisor on Behavioral Economics, United States Treasury and Office of Management and Budget, 2010-2011 Faculty Affiliate, Center for International Development, Kennedy School
    [Show full text]
  • The Persistence of Poverty in the Context of Financial Instability
    The Persistence of Poverty in Lisa A. Gennetian the Context of Financial Eldar Shafir Instability: A Behavioral Perspective Abstract We review recent findings regarding the psychology of decisionmaking in contexts of poverty, and consider their application to public policy. Of particular interest are the oft-neglected psychological and behavioral consequences of economic scarcity coupled with financial instability. The novel framework highlights the psychological costs of low and unstable incomes, and how these can transform small and momentary financial hurdles into long-lasting poverty traps. Financial instability, we suggest, not only has obvious economic ramifications for well-being, but it also creates the need for constant focus and attention, and can distract from the very opportunities otherwise designed to alleviate the effects of poverty. We describe a variety of public policy strategies that emerge from this perspective that are not readily apparent in conventional theories that permeate the design of social programs. C 2015 by the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management. INTRODUCTION Many Americans—nearly a hundred million—are living precariously near the poverty line and experiencing ongoing challenges balancing their finances (Hacker, 2006; U.S. Census Bureau, n.d.). Although the aftermath of the 2008 recession may be appropriately blamed for recent upticks in poverty, the prospects for economic mobility did not appear measurably better in prior decades. Permanently moving out of poverty is rare and challenging. More than half of those individuals in the bottom income quintile in 1994 remained there 10 years later, and fewer than 4 percent reached the top quintile (Acs & Zimmerman, 2008). Equally troublesome are the long-term societal costs of intergenerational poverty, estimated by some to be in the order of $500 billion annually (Holzer et al., 2007).
    [Show full text]