DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:2103.13384V2 [Math.RA] 30 Mar 2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:2103.13384V2 [Math.RA] 30 Mar 2021 CHARACTERIZING TOTAL NEGATIVITY AND TESTING THEIR INTERVAL HULLS PROJESH NATH CHOUDHURY Abstract. A matrix is called totally negative (totally non-positive) of order k, if all its minors of size at most k are negative (non-positive). The objective of this article is to provide several novel characterizations of total negativity via the (a) sign non-reversal property, (b) variation diminishing property, and (c) Linear Complementarity Problem. More strongly, each of these three characteri- zations uses a single test vector. As an application of the sign non-reversal property, we study the interval hull of two rectangular matrices. In particular, we identify two matrices C±(A, B) in the interval hull of matrices A and B that test total negativity of order k, simultaneously for the entire interval hull. We also show analogous characterizations for totally non-positive matrices. These novel characterizations may be considered similar in spirit to fundamental results characterizing totally positive matrices by Brown–Johnstone–MacGibbon [J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 1981] (see also Gantmacher–Krein, 1950), Choudhury–Kannan–Khare [Bull. London Math. Soc., in press] and Choudhury [2021 preprint]. Finally using a 1950 result of Gantmacher–Krein, we show that totally negative/non-positive matrices can not be detected by (single) test vectors from orthants other than the open bi-orthant that have coordinates with alternating signs, via the sign non-reversal property or the variation diminishing property. Contents 1. Introduction and main results 1 2. Theorems A and B: Sign non-reversal property and interval hulls for totally negative matrices 5 3. Theorem C: Characterization of total negativity using variation diminution 6 4. Theorems D and E: Characterization of total negativity viatheLCP 8 5. Characterizations for totally non-positive matrices 9 6. Other orthants cannot yield test vectors 12 Acknowledgments 13 References 13 1. Introduction and main results Rm×n arXiv:2103.13384v2 [math.RA] 30 Mar 2021 Given integers m,n ≥ k ≥ 1, a real matrix A ∈ is called totally negative of order k if all minors of A of order at most k are negative, and A is called totally negative if k = min{m,n}. Similarly, one defines totally non-positive matrices (including order k). In prior discussions of totally negative (or totally non-positive) matrices, their analogy to totally positive/TP (or totally non-negative/TN) matrices, which are matrices with all positive (or non- negative) minors, perpetually comes up first (and which we refer to henceforth by the standard abbreviations TP and TN, or T Pk and TNk to distinguish them from the matrices studied in the present paper.) Indeed, TP and TN are widely studied because of their numerous applications in a variety of topics in mathematics, including, analysis, combinatorics, cluster algebras, differential equations, Gabor analysis, matrix theory, probability, and representation theory [2, 3, 4, 15, 16, Date: July 22, 2021. 2020 Mathematics Subject Classification. 15B48,(primary), 15A24, 65G30, 90C33 (secondary). Key words and phrases. Totally negative matrix, totally non-positive matrix, sign non-reversal property, variation diminishing property, Linear Complementarity Problem, interval hull of matrices . 1 2 PROJESH NATH CHOUDHURY 17, 19, 22, 26, 30, 31, 34, 35, 36]. In 1937, Gantmacher–Krein [18] characterized TP matrices using positivity of the spectra of all square submatrices. A similar characterization for totally negative matrices was given by Fallat–van den Driessche in 2000 [14]. They proved that if A is a totally negative matrix then all the eigenvalues of each square submatrix of A are real, distinct, nonzero and exactly one eigenvalue is negative. (The converse is immediate.) Similar spectral characterizations hold for TN and totally non-positive matrices, using the density of TP and totally negative matrices in these classes and the continuity of roots. Totally negative/non-positive matrices are also studied in the context of matrix factorization and spectral perturbation, see [6, 7, 23]. Another interesting property exhibited by TP and TN matrices is the variation diminishing property. The variation diminishing property is also satisfied by other matrices, e.g. −A for A TP/TN. This was explored by Motzkin [28] in his PhD thesis in 1936, and he showed that the class of matrices satisfying the variation diminishing property are precisely the sign-regular matrices – in other words, there exists a sequence of signs εk ∈ {±1} such that every k × k minor of A has sign εk, for all k ≥ 1. A systematic treatment of sign-regular matrices and kernels can be found in Karlin’s comprehensive monograph [26]. The goal of this note is to provide similar characterization results for the class of totally nega- tive/totally non-positive matrices, i.e. ones for which all minors are negative/non-positive. More precisely, we provide novel characterizations of such matrices using (a) sign non-reversal and (b) Linear Complementarity, to go along with Motzkin’s classical characterization using (c) variation diminution. In addition, we strengthen all three tests (a), (b), and (c) to work with only a single test vector, in parallel to our recent works [8, 9] for TP matrices. To state these results, we need some preliminary definitions, which are used below without further reference. Definition 1.1. Let m,n ≥ 1 be integers. (1) A square matrix A ∈ Rn×n has the sign non-reversal property on a set of vectors T ⊆ Rn, if for all vectors 0 6= x ∈ T , there exists a coordinate i ∈ [1,n] such that xi(Ax)i > 0. (2) A matrix A ∈ Rn×n has the non-strict sign non-reversal property on a set of vectors T ⊆ Rn if for all nonzero vectors x ∈ T , there exists a coordinate i ∈ [1,n] such that xi 6= 0 and xi(Ax)i ≥ 0. (3) A contiguous submatrix is a submatrix whose rows and columns are indexed by sets of consecutive integers. Rn Rn (4) Let alt ⊂ denote the set of real vectors whose coordinates are nonzero and have Rn Rn alternating signs. Also define +,− to comprise the vectors in with at least one positive and one negative coordinate. (5) Given a matrix A ∈ Rn×n and i, j ∈ [1,n], let Aij denote the determinant of the submatrix of A of size n − 1 formed by deleting the ith row and jth column of A. (6) If n = 1, then define A11 := −1 to be the determinant of the empty matrix. (This, convention will only be used in Theorem E, Proposition 5.8 and their proofs.) (7) Let adj(A) denote the adjugate matrix of A and let ei ∈ Rn denote the vector whose i-th component is 1, and other components are zero. (8) We say that an array X is ≥ 0 (respectively X > 0, X ≤ 0, X< 0) if all coordinates of X are ≥ 0 (respectively > 0, ≤ 0, < 0). (9) Define the vector d[n] := (1, −1,..., (−1)n−1)T ∈ Rn. T n (10) Given z = (z1,...,zn) ∈ {±1} , define the diagonal matrix Dz whose ith diagonal entry is zi. (11) Given two matrices A, B ∈ Rm×n, and tuples of signs z ∈ {±1}m, z˜ ∈ {±1}n, define the ± m × n matrices |A|, Iz,z˜(A, B), and C (A, B) via: A + B |A − B| ± |A| := |a |, I (A, B) := − D D , C (A, B) := I [m] [n] (A, B). ij ij z,z˜ 2 z 2 z˜ d , ±d CHARACTERIZING TOTAL NEGATIVITY AND TESTING THEIR INTERVAL HULLS 3 (12) Given a vector x ∈ Rn, let S−(x) denote the number of sign changes in x after removing all zero entries. Next, assign a value of ±1 to each zero entry of x, and let S+(x) denote the maximum possible number of sign changes in the resulting sequence. For 0 ∈ Rn, we define S+(0) := n and S−(0) := 0. Now we state our main results only for totally negative matrices. The penultimate section contains the analogous theorems for totally non-positive matrices. Our first result provides a characterization of total negativity in terms of sign non-reversal phenomena. Theorem A. Let m,n ≥ k ≥ 2 be integers, and A ∈ Rm×n such that A < 0. The following statements are equivalent: (1) The matrix A is totally negative of order k. Rr (2) Every square submatrix of A of size r ∈ [2, k] has the sign non-reversal property on +,−. (3) Every contiguous square submatrix of A of size r ∈ [2, k] has the sign non-reversal property Rr on alt. In fact, these conditions are further equivalent to sign non-reversal at a single vector: (4) For every contiguous submatrix Ar of A of size r ∈ [2, k] and for any fixed nonzero vector r−1 T r α := (α1, −α2,..., (−1) αr) ∈ R with all αi ≥ 0 (or ≤ 0), define the vector Ar x := adj(Ar)α. (1.1) Ar Then Ar has the sign non-reversal property for x . Remark 1.2. A careful look at the characterization of TP in [8, 9] reveals the importance of the signs of the entries of A. Indeed, if A > 0 in Theorem A, the assertions (3), (4) are instead equivalent to T Pk. As an application of Theorem A, we simultaneously detect the total negativity of an entire interval hull of matrices by reducing it to a set of two test matrices. Recall that the interval hull of two matrices A, B ∈ Rm×n, denoted by I(A, B), is defined as follows: m×n I(A, B)= {C ∈ R : cij = tijaij + (1 − tij)bij,tij ∈ [0, 1]}. (1.2) If A 6= B, then I(A, B) is an uncountable set. We say that an interval hull is totally negative of order k if all the matrices in it are totally negative of order k.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Linear Algebra: Example Sheet 2 of 4
    Michaelmas Term 2014 SJW Linear Algebra: Example Sheet 2 of 4 1. (Another proof of the row rank column rank equality.) Let A be an m × n matrix of (column) rank r. Show that r is the least integer for which A factorises as A = BC with B 2 Matm;r(F) and C 2 Matr;n(F). Using the fact that (BC)T = CT BT , deduce that the (column) rank of AT equals r. 2. Write down the three types of elementary matrices and find their inverses. Show that an n × n matrix A is invertible if and only if it can be written as a product of elementary matrices. Use this method to find the inverse of 0 1 −1 0 1 @ 0 0 1 A : 0 3 −1 3. Let A and B be n × n matrices over a field F . Show that the 2n × 2n matrix IB IB C = can be transformed into D = −A 0 0 AB by elementary row operations (which you should specify). By considering the determinants of C and D, obtain another proof that det AB = det A det B. 4. (i) Let V be a non-trivial real vector space of finite dimension. Show that there are no endomorphisms α; β of V with αβ − βα = idV . (ii) Let V be the space of infinitely differentiable functions R ! R. Find endomorphisms α; β of V which do satisfy αβ − βα = idV . 5. Find the eigenvalues and give bases for the eigenspaces of the following complex matrices: 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 −1 1 0 1 1 −1 1 @ 0 3 −2 A ; @ 0 3 −2 A ; @ −1 3 −1 A : 0 1 0 0 1 0 −1 1 1 The second and third matrices commute; find a basis with respect to which they are both diagonal.
    [Show full text]
  • Linear Algebra Review James Chuang
    Linear algebra review James Chuang December 15, 2016 Contents 2.1 vector-vector products ............................................... 1 2.2 matrix-vector products ............................................... 2 2.3 matrix-matrix products ............................................... 4 3.2 the transpose .................................................... 5 3.3 symmetric matrices ................................................. 5 3.4 the trace ....................................................... 6 3.5 norms ........................................................ 6 3.6 linear independence and rank ............................................ 7 3.7 the inverse ...................................................... 7 3.8 orthogonal matrices ................................................. 8 3.9 range and nullspace of a matrix ........................................... 8 3.10 the determinant ................................................... 9 3.11 quadratic forms and positive semidefinite matrices ................................ 10 3.12 eigenvalues and eigenvectors ........................................... 11 3.13 eigenvalues and eigenvectors of symmetric matrices ............................... 12 4.1 the gradient ..................................................... 13 4.2 the Hessian ..................................................... 14 4.3 gradients and hessians of linear and quadratic functions ............................. 15 4.5 gradients of the determinant ............................................ 16 4.6 eigenvalues
    [Show full text]
  • A New Algorithm to Obtain the Adjugate Matrix Using CUBLAS on GPU González, H.E., Carmona, L., J.J
    ISSN: 2277-3754 ISO 9001:2008 Certified International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Technology (IJEIT) Volume 7, Issue 4, October 2017 A New Algorithm to Obtain the Adjugate Matrix using CUBLAS on GPU González, H.E., Carmona, L., J.J. Information Technology Department, ININ-ITTLA Information Technology Department, ININ proved to be the best option for most practical applications. Abstract— In this paper a parallel code for obtain the Adjugate The new transformation proposed here can be obtained from Matrix with real coefficients are used. We postulate a new linear it. Next, we briefly review this topic. transformation in matrix product form and we apply this linear transformation to an augmented matrix (A|I) by means of both a minimum and a complete pivoting strategies, then we obtain the II. LU-MATRICIAL DECOMPOSITION WITH GT. Adjugate matrix. Furthermore, if we apply this new linear NOTATION AND DEFINITIONS transformation and the above pivot strategy to a augmented The problem of solving a linear system of equations matrix (A|b), we obtain a Cramer’s solution of the linear system of Ax b is central to the field of matrix computation. There are equations. That new algorithm present an O n3 computational several ways to perform the elimination process necessary for complexity when n . We use subroutines of CUBLAS 2nd A, b R its matrix triangulation. We will focus on the Doolittle-Gauss rd and 3 levels in double precision and we obtain correct numeric elimination method: the algorithm of choice when A is square, results. dense, and un-structured. nxn Index Terms—Adjoint matrix, Adjugate matrix, Cramer’s Let us assume that AR is nonsingular and that we rule, CUBLAS, GPU.
    [Show full text]
  • Field of U-Invariants of Adjoint Representation of the Group GL (N, K)
    Field of U-invariants of adjoint representation of the group GL(n,K) K.A.Vyatkina A.N.Panov ∗ It is known that the field of invariants of an arbitrary unitriangular group is rational (see [1]). In this paper for adjoint representation of the group GL(n,K) we present the algebraically system of generators of the field of U-invariants. Note that the algorithm for calculating generators of the field of invariants of an arbitrary rational representation of an unipotent group was presented in [2, Chapter 1]. The invariants was constructed using induction on the length of Jordan-H¨older series. In our case the length is equal to n2; that is why it is difficult to apply the algorithm. −1 Let us consider the adjoint representation AdgA = gAg of the group GL(n,K), where K is a field of zero characteristic, on the algebra of matri- ces M = Mat(n,K). The adjoint representation determines the representation −1 ρg on K[M] (resp. K(M)) by formula ρgf(A)= f(g Ag). Let U be the subgroup of upper triangular matrices in GL(n,K) with units on the diagonal. A polynomial (rational function) f on M is called an U- invariant, if ρuf = f for every u ∈ U. The set of U-invariant rational functions K(M)U is a subfield of K(M). Let {xi,j} be a system of standard coordinate functions on M. Construct a X X∗ ∗ X X∗ X∗ X matrix = (xij). Let = (xij) be its adjugate matrix, · = · = det X · E. Denote by Jk the left lower corner minor of order k of the matrix X.
    [Show full text]
  • Formalizing the Matrix Inversion Based on the Adjugate Matrix in HOL4 Liming Li, Zhiping Shi, Yong Guan, Jie Zhang, Hongxing Wei
    Formalizing the Matrix Inversion Based on the Adjugate Matrix in HOL4 Liming Li, Zhiping Shi, Yong Guan, Jie Zhang, Hongxing Wei To cite this version: Liming Li, Zhiping Shi, Yong Guan, Jie Zhang, Hongxing Wei. Formalizing the Matrix Inversion Based on the Adjugate Matrix in HOL4. 8th International Conference on Intelligent Information Processing (IIP), Oct 2014, Hangzhou, China. pp.178-186, 10.1007/978-3-662-44980-6_20. hal-01383331 HAL Id: hal-01383331 https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01383331 Submitted on 18 Oct 2016 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution| 4.0 International License Formalizing the Matrix Inversion Based on the Adjugate Matrix in HOL4 Liming LI1, Zhiping SHI1?, Yong GUAN1, Jie ZHANG2, and Hongxing WEI3 1 Beijing Key Laboratory of Electronic System Reliability Technology, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China [email protected], [email protected] 2 College of Information Science & Technology, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China 3 School of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Beihang University, Beijing 100083, China Abstract. This paper presents the formalization of the matrix inversion based on the adjugate matrix in the HOL4 system.
    [Show full text]
  • Linearized Polynomials Over Finite Fields Revisited
    Linearized polynomials over finite fields revisited∗ Baofeng Wu,† Zhuojun Liu‡ Abstract We give new characterizations of the algebra Ln(Fqn ) formed by all linearized polynomials over the finite field Fqn after briefly sur- veying some known ones. One isomorphism we construct is between ∨ L F n F F n n( q ) and the composition algebra qn ⊗Fq q . The other iso- morphism we construct is between Ln(Fqn ) and the so-called Dickson matrix algebra Dn(Fqn ). We also further study the relations between a linearized polynomial and its associated Dickson matrix, generalizing a well-known criterion of Dickson on linearized permutation polyno- mials. Adjugate polynomial of a linearized polynomial is then intro- duced, and connections between them are discussed. Both of the new characterizations can bring us more simple approaches to establish a special form of representations of linearized polynomials proposed re- cently by several authors. Structure of the subalgebra Ln(Fqm ) which are formed by all linearized polynomials over a subfield Fqm of Fqn where m|n are also described. Keywords Linearized polynomial; Composition algebra; Dickson arXiv:1211.5475v2 [math.RA] 1 Jan 2013 matrix algebra; Representation. ∗Partially supported by National Basic Research Program of China (2011CB302400). †Key Laboratory of Mathematics Mechanization, AMSS, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China. Email: [email protected] ‡Key Laboratory of Mathematics Mechanization, AMSS, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China. Email: [email protected] 1 1 Introduction n Let Fq and Fqn be the finite fields with q and q elements respectively, where q is a prime or a prime power.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2012.03523V3 [Math.NT] 16 May 2021 Favne Cetfi Optn Eerh(SR Spr Ft of Part (CM4)
    WRONSKIAN´ ALGEBRA AND BROADHURST–ROBERTS QUADRATIC RELATIONS YAJUN ZHOU To the memory of Dr. W (1986–2020) ABSTRACT. Throughalgebraicmanipulationson Wronskian´ matrices whose entries are reducible to Bessel moments, we present a new analytic proof of the quadratic relations conjectured by Broadhurst and Roberts, along with some generalizations. In the Wronskian´ framework, we reinterpret the de Rham intersection pairing through polynomial coefficients in Vanhove’s differential operators, and compute the Betti inter- section pairing via linear sum rules for on-shell and off-shell Feynman diagrams at threshold momenta. From the ideal generated by Broadhurst–Roberts quadratic relations, we derive new non-linear sum rules for on-shell Feynman diagrams, including an infinite family of determinant identities that are compatible with Deligne’s conjectures for critical values of motivic L-functions. CONTENTS 1. Introduction 1 2. W algebra 5 2.1. Wronskian´ matrices and Vanhove operators 5 2.2. Block diagonalization of on-shell Wronskian´ matrices 8 2.3. Sumrulesforon-shellandoff-shellBesselmoments 11 3. W⋆ algebra 20 3.1. Cofactors of Wronskians´ 21 3.2. Threshold behavior of Wronskian´ cofactors 24 3.3. Quadratic relations for off-shell Bessel moments 30 4. Broadhurst–Roberts quadratic relations 37 4.1. Quadratic relations for on-shell Bessel moments 37 4.2. Arithmetic applications to Feynman diagrams 43 4.3. Alternative representations of de Rham matrices 49 References 53 arXiv:2012.03523v3 [math.NT] 16 May 2021 Date: May 18, 2021. Keywords: Bessel moments, Feynman integrals, Wronskian´ matrices, Bernoulli numbers Subject Classification (AMS 2020): 11B68, 33C10, 34M35 (Primary) 81T18, 81T40 (Secondary) * This research was supported in part by the Applied Mathematics Program within the Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Advanced Scientific Computing Research (ASCR) as part of the Collaboratory on Mathematics for Mesoscopic Modeling of Materials (CM4).
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 5: Matrix Operations: Inverse
    Lecture 5: Matrix Operations: Inverse • Inverse of a matrix • Computation of inverse using co-factor matrix • Properties of the inverse of a matrix • Inverse of special matrices • Unit Matrix • Diagonal Matrix • Orthogonal Matrix • Lower/Upper Triangular Matrices 1 Matrix Inverse • Inverse of a matrix can only be defined for square matrices. • Inverse of a square matrix exists only if the determinant of that matrix is non-zero. • Inverse matrix of 퐴 is noted as 퐴−1. • 퐴퐴−1 = 퐴−1퐴 = 퐼 • Example: 2 −1 0 1 • 퐴 = , 퐴−1 = , 1 0 −1 2 2 −1 0 1 0 1 2 −1 1 0 • 퐴퐴−1 = = 퐴−1퐴 = = 1 0 −1 2 −1 2 1 0 0 1 2 Inverse of a 3 x 3 matrix (using cofactor matrix) • Calculating the inverse of a 3 × 3 matrix is: • Compute the matrix of minors for A. • Compute the cofactor matrix by alternating + and – signs. • Compute the adjugate matrix by taking a transpose of cofactor matrix. • Divide all elements in the adjugate matrix by determinant of matrix 퐴. 1 퐴−1 = 푎푑푗(퐴) det(퐴) 3 Inverse of a 3 x 3 matrix (using cofactor matrix) 3 0 2 퐴 = 2 0 −2 0 1 1 0 −2 2 −2 2 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 2 2 2 0 2 3 2 3 0 Matrix of Minors = = −2 3 3 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 2 3 2 3 0 0 −10 0 0 −2 2 −2 2 0 2 2 2 1 −1 1 2 −2 2 Cofactor of A (퐂) = −2 3 3 .∗ −1 1 −1 = 2 3 −3 0 −10 0 1 −1 1 0 10 0 2 2 0 adj A = CT = −2 3 10 2 −3 0 2 2 0 0.2 0.2 0 1 1 A-1 = ∗ adj A = −2 3 10 = −0.2 0.3 1 |퐴| 10 2 −3 0 0.2 −0.3 0 4 Properties of Inverse of a Matrix • (A-1)-1 = A • (AB)-1 = B-1A-1 • (kA)-1 = k-1A-1 where k is a non-zero scalar.
    [Show full text]
  • Contents 2 Matrices and Systems of Linear Equations
    Business Math II (part 2) : Matrices and Systems of Linear Equations (by Evan Dummit, 2019, v. 1.00) Contents 2 Matrices and Systems of Linear Equations 1 2.1 Systems of Linear Equations . 1 2.1.1 Elimination, Matrix Formulation . 2 2.1.2 Row-Echelon Form and Reduced Row-Echelon Form . 4 2.1.3 Gaussian Elimination . 6 2.2 Matrix Operations: Addition and Multiplication . 8 2.3 Determinants and Inverses . 11 2.3.1 The Inverse of a Matrix . 11 2.3.2 The Determinant of a Matrix . 13 2.3.3 Cofactor Expansions and the Adjugate . 16 2.3.4 Matrices and Systems of Linear Equations, Revisited . 18 2 Matrices and Systems of Linear Equations In this chapter, we will discuss the problem of solving systems of linear equations, reformulate the problem using matrices, and then give the general procedure for solving such systems. We will then study basic matrix operations (addition and multiplication) and discuss the inverse of a matrix and how it relates to another quantity known as the determinant. We will then revisit systems of linear equations after reformulating them in the language of matrices. 2.1 Systems of Linear Equations • Our motivating problem is to study the solutions to a system of linear equations, such as the system x + 3x = 5 1 2 : 3x1 + x2 = −1 ◦ Recall that a linear equation is an equation of the form a1x1 + a2x2 + ··· + anxn = b, for some constants a1; : : : an; b, and variables x1; : : : ; xn. ◦ When we seek to nd the solutions to a system of linear equations, this means nding all possible values of the variables such that all equations are satised simultaneously.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture No. 6
    Preliminaries: linear algebra State-space models System interconnections Control Theory (035188) lecture no. 6 Leonid Mirkin Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Technion | IIT Preliminaries: linear algebra State-space models System interconnections Outline Preliminaries: linear algebra State-space models System interconnections in terms of state-space realizations Preliminaries: linear algebra State-space models System interconnections Outline Preliminaries: linear algebra State-space models System interconnections in terms of state-space realizations Preliminaries: linear algebra State-space models System interconnections Linear algebra, notation and terminology A matrix A Rn×m is an n m table of real numbers, 2 × 2 3 a a a m 11 12 ··· 1 6 a21 a22 a1m 7 A = 6 . ··· . 7 = [aij ]; 4 . 5 · an an anm 1 2 ··· accompanied by their manipulation rules (addition, multiplication, etc). The number of linearly independent rows (or columns) in A is called its rank and denoted rank A. A matrix A Rn×m is said to 2 have full row (column) rank if rank A = n (rank A = m) − be square if n = m, tall if n > m, and fat if n < m − be diagonal (A = diag ai ) if it is square and aij = 0 whenever i = j − f g 6 be lower (upper) triangular if aij = 0 whenever i > j (i < j) − 0 0 be symmetric if A = A , where the transpose A = [aji ] − · The identity matrix I = diag 1 Rn×n (if the dimension is clear, just I ). n · It is a convention that ·A0 = I fforg every2 nonzero square A. Preliminaries: linear algebra State-space models System interconnections Block matrices n×m P P Let A R and let i=1 ni = n and i=1 mi = n for some ni ; mi N.
    [Show full text]
  • 1111: Linear Algebra I
    1111: Linear Algebra I Dr. Vladimir Dotsenko (Vlad) Michaelmas Term 2015 Dr. Vladimir Dotsenko (Vlad) 1111: Linear Algebra I Michaelmas Term 2015 1 / 10 Row expansion of the determinant Our next goal is to prove the following formula: i1 i2 in det(A) = ai1C + ai2C + ··· + ainC ; in other words, if we multiply each element of the i-th row of A by its cofactor and add results, the number we obtain is equal to det(A). Let us first handle the case i = 1. In this case, once we write the corresponding minors with signs, the formula reads 11 12 n+1 1n det(A) = a11A - a12A + ··· + (-1) a1nA : Let us examine the formula for det(A). It is a sum of terms corresponding to pick n elements representing each row and each column of A. In particular, it involves picking an element from the first row. This can be one of the elements a11; a12;:::; a1n. What remains, after we picked the element a1k , is to pick other elements; now we have to avoid the row 1 and the column k. This means that the elements we need to pick are precisely those involved in the determinant A1k , and we just need to check that the signs match. Dr. Vladimir Dotsenko (Vlad) 1111: Linear Algebra I Michaelmas Term 2015 2 / 10 Row expansion of the determinant 1 In fact, it is quite easy to keep track of all signs. The column in the k two-row notation does not add inversions in the first row, and adds k - 1 inversions in the second row, since k appears before 1; 2;:::; k - 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1912.06967V1 [Math.RA] 15 Dec 2019 Values Faui Eigenvector Unit a of Ler Teacher
    MORE ON THE EIGENVECTORS-FROM-EIGENVALUES IDENTITY MALGORZATA STAWISKA Abstract. Using the notion of a higher adjugate of a matrix, we generalize the eigenvector-eigenvalue formula surveyed in [4] to arbitrary square matrices over C and their possibly multiple eigenvalues. 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. 15A15, 15A24, 15A75 Keywords: Matrices, characteristic polynomial, eigenvalues, eigenvec- tors, adjugates. Dedication: To the memory of Witold Kleiner (1929-2018), my linear algebra teacher. 1. Introduction Very recently the following relation between eigenvectors and eigen- values of a Hermitian matrix (called “the eigenvector-eigenvalue iden- tity”) gained attention: Theorem 1.1. ([4]) If A is an n × n Hermitian matrix with eigen- values λ1(A), ..., λn(A) and i, j = 1, ..., n, then the jth component vi,j of a unit eigenvector vi associated to the eigenvalue λi(A) is related to the eigenvalues λ1(Mj), ..., λn−1(Mj) of the minor Mj of A formed by removing the jth row and column by the formula n n−1 2 |vi,j| Y (λi(A) − λk(A)) = Y(λi(A) − λk(Mj)). arXiv:1912.06967v1 [math.RA] 15 Dec 2019 k=1;k=6 i k=1 The survey paper ([4]) presents several proofs and some generaliza- tions of this identity, along with its many variants encountered in the modern literature, while also commenting on some sociology-of-science aspects of its jump in popularity. It should be pointed out that for sym- metric matrices over R this formula was established already in 1834 by Carl Gustav Jacob Jacobi as formula 30 in his paper [9] (in the process of proving that every real quadratic form has an orthogonal diagonal- ization).
    [Show full text]