Virulence Factors of Meningitis-Causing Bacteria: Enabling Brain Entry Across the Blood–Brain Barrier
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Burkholderia Cepacia Complex As Human Pathogens1
Journal of Nematology 35(2):212–217. 2003. © The Society of Nematologists 2003. Burkholderia cepacia Complex as Human Pathogens1 John J. LiPuma2 Abstract: Although sporadic human infection due to Burkholderia cepacia has been reported for many years, it has been only during the past few decades that species within the B. cepacia complex have emerged as significant opportunistic human pathogens. Individuals with cystic fibrosis, the most common inherited genetic disease in Caucasian populations, or chronic granulomatous disease, a primary immunodeficiency, are particularly at risk of life-threatening infection. Despite advances in our understanding of the taxonomy, microbiology, and epidemiology of B. cepacia complex, much remains unknown regarding specific human virulence factors. The broad-spectrum antimicrobial resistance demonstrated by most strains limits current therapy of infection. Recent research efforts are aimed at a better appreciation of the pathogenesis of human infection and the development of novel therapeutic and prophylactic strategies. Key words: Burkholderia cepacia, cystic fibrosis, human infection. Until relatively recently, Burkholderia cepacia had been B. cepacia, possess other factors that remain to be elu- considered a phytopathogenic or saprophytic bacterial cidated that also mediate pathogenicity in this condi- species with little potential for human infection. How- tion (Speert et al., 1994). Fortunately, CGD is a rela- ever, reports of sporadic human infection have ap- tively rare disease, having an average annual incidence peared in the biomedical literature, generally describ- of approximately 1/200,000 live births in the United ing infection in persons with some underlying disease States; this means there are approximately 20 persons or debilitation (Dailey and Benner, 1968; Poe et al., with CGD born each year in the United States. -
12. What's Really New in Antibiotic Therapy Print
What’s really new in antibiotic therapy? Martin J. Hug Freiburg University Medical Center EAHP Academy Seminars 20-21 September 2019 Newsweek, May 24-31 2019 Disclosures There are no conflicts of interest to declare EAHP Academy Seminars 20-21 September 2019 Antiinfectives and Resistance EAHP Academy Seminars 20-21 September 2019 Resistance of Klebsiella pneumoniae to Pip.-Taz. olates) EAHP Academy Seminars 20-21 September 2019 https://resistancemap.cddep.org/AntibioticResistance.php Multiresistant Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Combined resistance against at least three different types of antibiotics, 2017 EAHP Academy Seminars 20-21 September 2019 https://atlas.ecdc.europa.eu/public/index.aspx Distribution of ESBL producing Enterobacteriaceae EAHP Academy Seminars 20-21 September 2019 Rossolini GM. Global threat of Gram-negative antimicrobial resistance. 27th ECCMID, Vienna, 2017, IS07 Priority Pathogens Defined by the World Health Organisation Critical Priority High Priority Medium Priority Acinetobacter baumanii Enterococcus faecium Streptococcus pneumoniae carbapenem-resistant vancomycin-resistant penicillin-non-susceptible Pseudomonas aeruginosa Helicobacter pylori Haemophilus influenzae carbapenem-resistant clarithromycin-resistant ampicillin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae Salmonella species Shigella species carbapenem-resistant fluoroquinolone-resistant fluoroquinolone-resistant Staphylococcus aureus vancomycin or methicillin -resistant Campylobacter species fluoroquinolone-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoae 3rd gen. cephalosporin-resistant -
B. Fragilis Is Mediated by Capsular
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.19.258442; this version posted August 21, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Hemagglutination by B. fragilis is mediated by capsular 2 polysaccharides and is influenced by host ABO blood type. 3 Kathleen L. Arnolds a, Nancy Moreno-Huizar b, Maggie A. Stanislawski c, 4 Brent Palmer c, Catherine Lozupone c* 5 a Department of Microbiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 6 Aurora, CO, USA [email protected] 7 b Department of Computer Science, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO, USA. 8 c Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, 9 CO, USA [email protected] 10 11 12 13 14 15 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.19.258442; this version posted August 21, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 16 Hemagglutination by B. fragilis is mediated by capsular polysaccharides and is 17 influenced by host ABO blood type. 18 19 Bacterial hemagglutination of red blood cells (RBCs) is mediated by 20 interactions between bacterial cell components and RBC envelope glycans 21 that vary across individuals by ABO blood type. -
Marion County Reportable Disease and Condition Summary, 2015
Marion County Reportable Disease and Condition Summary, 2015 Marion County Health Department 3180 Center St NE, Salem, OR 97301 503-588-5357 http://www.co.marion.or.us/HLT Reportable Diseases and Conditions in Marion County, 2015 # of Disease/Condition cases •This table shows all reportable Chlamydia 1711 Animal Bites 663 cases of disease, infection, Hepatitis C (chronic) 471 microorganism, and conditions Gonorrhea 251 Campylobacteriosis 68 in Marion County in 2015. Latent Tuberculosis 68 Syphilis 66 Pertussis 64 •The 3 most reported Salmonellosis 52 E. Coli 31 diseases/conditions in Marion HIV Infection 20 County in 2015 were Chlamydia, Hepatitis B (chronic) 18 Elevated Blood Lead Levels 17 Animal Bites, and Chronic Giardia 14 Pelvic Inflammatory Disease 13 Hepatitis C. Cryptosporidiosis 11 Cryptococcus 9 Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae 8 •Health care providers report all Haemophilus Influenzae 8 Tuberculosis 6 cases or possible cases of Shigellosis 3 diseases, infections, Hepatitis C (acute) 2 Listeriosis 2 microorganisms and conditions Non-TB Mycobacteria 2 within certain time frames as Rabies (animal) 2 Scombroid 2 specified by the state health Taeniasis/Cysticercosis 2 Coccidioidomycosis 1 department, Oregon Health Dengue 1 Authority. Hepatitis A 1 Hepatitis B (acute) 1 Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome 1 Legionellosis 1 •A full list of Oregon reportable Malaria 1 diseases and conditions are Meningococcal Disease 1 Tularemia 1 available here Vibriosis 1 Yersiniosis 1 Total 3,595 Campylobacter (Campy) -Campylobacteriosis is an infectious illness caused by a bacteria. -Most ill people have diarrhea, cramping, stomach pain, and fever within 2-5 days after bacteria exposure. People are usually sick for about a week. -
Francisella Tularensis 6/06 Tularemia Is a Commonly Acquired Laboratory Colony Morphology Infection; All Work on Suspect F
Francisella tularensis 6/06 Tularemia is a commonly acquired laboratory Colony Morphology infection; all work on suspect F. tularensis cultures .Aerobic, fastidious, requires cysteine for growth should be performed at minimum under BSL2 .Grows poorly on Blood Agar (BA) conditions with BSL3 practices. .Chocolate Agar (CA): tiny, grey-white, opaque A colonies, 1-2 mm ≥48hr B .Cysteine Heart Agar (CHA): greenish-blue colonies, 2-4 mm ≥48h .Colonies are butyrous and smooth Gram Stain .Tiny, 0.2–0.7 μm pleomorphic, poorly stained gram-negative coccobacilli .Mostly single cells Growth on BA (A) 48 h, (B) 72 h Biochemical/Test Reactions .Oxidase: Negative A B .Catalase: Weak positive .Urease: Negative Additional Information .Can be misidentified as: Haemophilus influenzae, Actinobacillus spp. by automated ID systems .Infective Dose: 10 colony forming units Biosafety Level 3 agent (once Francisella tularensis is . Growth on CA (A) 48 h, (B) 72 h suspected, work should only be done in a certified Class II Biosafety Cabinet) .Transmission: Inhalation, insect bite, contact with tissues or bodily fluids of infected animals .Contagious: No Acceptable Specimen Types .Tissue biopsy .Whole blood: 5-10 ml blood in EDTA, and/or Inoculated blood culture bottle Swab of lesion in transport media . Gram stain Sentinel Laboratory Rule-Out of Francisella tularensis Oxidase Little to no growth on BA >48 h Small, grey-white opaque colonies on CA after ≥48 h at 35/37ºC Positive Weak Negative Positive Catalase Tiny, pleomorphic, faintly stained, gram-negative coccobacilli (red, round, and random) Perform all additional work in a certified Class II Positive Biosafety Cabinet Weak Negative Positive *Oxidase: Negative Urease *Catalase: Weak positive *Urease: Negative *Oxidase, Catalase, and Urease: Appearances of test results are not agent-specific. -
African Meningitis Belt
WHO/EMC/BAC/98.3 Control of epidemic meningococcal disease. WHO practical guidelines. 2nd edition World Health Organization Emerging and other Communicable Diseases, Surveillance and Control This document has been downloaded from the WHO/EMC Web site. The original cover pages and lists of participants are not included. See http://www.who.int/emc for more information. © World Health Organization This document is not a formal publication of the World Health Organization (WHO), and all rights are reserved by the Organization. The document may, however, be freely reviewed, abstracted, reproduced and translated, in part or in whole, but not for sale nor for use in conjunction with commercial purposes. The views expressed in documents by named authors are solely the responsibility of those authors. The mention of specific companies or specific manufacturers' products does no imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. CONTENTS CONTENTS ................................................................................... i PREFACE ..................................................................................... vii INTRODUCTION ......................................................................... 1 1. MAGNITUDE OF THE PROBLEM ........................................................3 1.1 REVIEW OF EPIDEMICS SINCE THE 1970S .......................................................................................... 3 Geographical distribution -
Bacteriophages Targeting Acinetobacter Baumannii Capsule
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.25.965590; this version posted February 26, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Bacteriophages targeting Acinetobacter baumannii capsule 2 induce antimicrobial resensitization 3 4 Fernando Gordillo Altamirano1*, John H. Forsyth1, Ruzeen Patwa1, Xenia Kostoulias2, Michael Trim1, Dinesh 5 Subedi1, Stuart Archer3, Faye C. Morris2, Cody Oliveira1, Luisa Kielty1, Denis Korneev1, Moira K. O’Bryan1, 6 Trevor J. Lithgow2, Anton Y. Peleg2,4, Jeremy J. Barr1* 7 8 1 School of Biological Sciences, Monash University 9 2 Biomedicine Discovery Institute and Department of Microbiology, Monash University 10 3 Monash Bioinformatics Platform, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University 11 4 Department of Infectious Diseases, The Alfred Hospital and Central Clinical School, Monash University 12 13 *Corresponding authors 14 Fernando Gordillo Altamirano [email protected] 15 Jeremy J. Barr [email protected] 16 School of Biological Sciences, Monash University 17 25 Rainforest Walk, 18 Clayton, 3800, VIC 19 Australia 20 21 Abstract 22 Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii is responsible for frequent, hard-to-treat and often fatal 23 healthcare-associated infections. Phage therapy, the use of viruses that infect and kill bacteria, is an approach 24 gaining significant clinical interest to combat antibiotic-resistant infections. However, a major limitation is that 25 bacteria can develop resistance against phages. Here, we isolated phages with activity against a panel of A. -
Haemophilus Influenzae Invasive Disease ! Report Immediately 24/7 by Phone Upon Initial Suspicion Or Laboratory Test Order
Haemophilus Influenzae Invasive Disease ! Report immediately 24/7 by phone upon initial suspicion or laboratory test order PROTOCOL CHECKLIST Enter available information into Merlin upon receipt of initial report for people <5 years old Review background on disease (see page 2), case definition (see page 4), and laboratory testing (see page 5) For cases in people ≥5 years old, interviews/investigations are not recommended unless the illness is known to be caused by H. influenzae type B. Surveillance for H. influenzae invasive disease in people ≥5 years old is now conducted only through electronic laboratory reporting (ELR) surveillance Contact health care provider to obtain pertinent information including demographics, medical records, vaccination history, and laboratory results Facilitate serotyping of H. influenzae isolates for people <5 years old at Florida Bureau of Public Health Laboratories (BPHL) Jacksonville Determine if the isolate is H. influenzae type b (Hib) Interview patient’s family or guardian Review disease facts Modes of transmission Incubation period Symptoms/types of infection Ask about exposure to relevant risk factors Exposure to a person with documented H. influenzae infection H. influenzae type B vaccination history Patient with immunocompromised state – HIV, sickle cell, asplenia, malignancy Determine if patient was hospitalized for reported illness Document pertinent clinical symptoms and type of infection Document close contacts (see page 7) and family members who may be at risk if Hib is identified Determine whether patient or symptomatic contact is in a sensitive situation (daycare or other settings with infants or unvaccinated children) Recommend exclusion for patients or symptomatic contacts until 24 hours of effective antibiotic treatment. -
A Review of Clinically Suspected Sepsis and Meningitis in Infants Under 90 Days Old in a Tertiary Care Center in Saudi Arabia
Journal of Microbiology and InfectiousBukhari Diseases EE, et / al. Sepsis and meningitis in infants 2011; 1 (2): 47-5247 JMID doi: 10.5799/ahinjs.02.2011.02.0012 ORIGINAL ARTICLE A review of clinically suspected sepsis and meningitis in infants under 90 days old in a tertiary care center in Saudi Arabia Elham Essa Bukhari, Abdulkarim Abdullah Alrabiaah Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine and King Khalid University Hospital, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia ABSTRACT Objectives: Infections in infants<90 days old are the leading cause of morbidity and hospitalization in neonatal prac- tice. The etiological agents of sepsis (with or without meningitis) in Saudi neonates <90 days old are vastly under- characterized. The aim of this study was to determine the bacterial etiology of neonatal sepsis and meningitis in these infants. Materials and methods: This retrospective study was conducted in King Khalid University Hospital, Riyadh, in the pe- riod from January 2007 to January 2011. All infants<90 days old with suspected sepsis during this period were examined for evidence of infection. Cultures, including blood and Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) were performed for all neonates. Results: A total of 304 cases of sepsis in infants <90 days were investigated. Community-acquired neonatal sepsis com- posed 284 of the studied cases present after the age of one month, while 20 infants were identified as having neonatal sepsis in the first month of life. Only 12 blood cultures were positive (four isolates of Staphylococcus epidermidis, two Staphylococcus aureus, two Staphylococcus hominis, one Enterobacter cloacae, one group B streptococcus, one diphthe- roids and one with Bacillus species). -
The Epidemiology of Meningitis in Infants Under 90 Days of Age in a Large Pediatric Hospital
microorganisms Article The Epidemiology of Meningitis in Infants under 90 Days of Age in a Large Pediatric Hospital Timothy A. Erickson 1,2, Flor M. Munoz 3, Catherine L. Troisi 2 , Melissa S. Nolan 4 , Rodrigo Hasbun 5, Eric L. Brown 2 and Kristy O. Murray 1,* 1 Department of Pediatrics, Section of Pediatric Tropical Medicine, William T. Shearer Center for Human Immunobiology, Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Children’s Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USA; [email protected] 2 School of Public Health, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; [email protected] (C.L.T.); [email protected] (E.L.B.) 3 Department of Pediatrics, Section of Infectious Diseases, Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Children’s Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USA; fl[email protected] 4 Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA; [email protected] 5 McGovern Medical School, University of Texas, Houston, TX 77030, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Background: Meningitis is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality, particularly in the first three months of life. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of patients <90 days of age with meningitis at Texas Children’s Hospital from 2010–2017. Cases were confirmed using the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) definition of meningitis. Results: Among 694 infants with meningitis, the most common etiology was viral (n = 351; 51%), primarily caused by Citation: Erickson, T.A.; Munoz, enterovirus (n = 332; 95%). -
An In-Vitro Investigation to Determine the Neuroinflammatory Response of CNS Cells to Oral Bacteria and Their Virulence Factors
An in-vitro investigation to determine the neuroinflammatory response of CNS cells to oral bacteria and their virulence factors by Rahul Previn A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment for the requirements for the degree of MSc (by Research) at the University of Central Lancashire February 2013 i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank the University of Central Lancashire, UK for the opportunity to undertake my postgraduate research degree. I wish to thank my Principle Investigator (PI) and Director of studies (D0S), Dean, Prof St John Crean for steering me into an interesting, and a hybrid dental-neurosciences project. His inspirational and expert guidance made the challenges of education seem more manageable. I would also like to thank Dr Peter Robinson, my Research Degrees Tutor (RDT), as without his expert help in getting through the various postgraduate degree hurdles would have been impossible. I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my supervisor, Dr Sim Singhrao for the daily guidance, advice, and patience throughout the practical work of the project. I would also like to thank Miss Sophie Poole, currently a PhD student, for ad-hoc assistance in the lab and for guidance in interpreting row data whenever she was nearby. I would like to acknowledge Prof. M. Curtis for the essential reagents I used to investigate my research question without which, my project would be incomplete. Above all, I would like to express my heartfelt gratitude to my family, especially my mother for her undying love, invaluable moral and financial support and encouragement to do well, during my time away from home. -
Meningococcal Meningitis (Neisseria Meningitidis)
Division of Disease Control What Do I Need To Know? Meningococcal Meningitis (Neisseria meningitidis) What is meningococcal meningitis ? Meningitis is a severe infection of the bloodstream and meninges (a thin lining covering the brain and spinal cord) caused by a bacteria or virus. Bacterial meningitis is usually more severe than viral meningitis but is less common. Bacterial meningitis is most commonly caused by Haemophilus influenzae type B, Streptococcus pneumoniae or Neisseria meningitidis. The most severe form of bacterial meningitis is called Neisseria meningitidis. It is a relatively rare disease and usually occurs as a single isolated event. Clusters of cases or outbreaks are rare in the United States. Who is at risk for meningococcal meningitis? Anyone can get meningococcal meningitis, but it is more common in infants and children. Other people at increased risk for meningitis are college freshmen living in dormitories, microbiologists who are routinely exposed, military recruits, and travelers to areas where meningitis occurs frequently, such as sub-Saharan Africa. What are the symptoms of meningococcal meningitis? Although most people exposed to the meningococcal bacteria do not become seriously ill, some may develop fever, headache, vomiting, stiff neck and a rash. Meningitis can cause sensitivity to light, confusion, drowsiness, seizures and sometimes coma. The disease is sometimes fatal. How soon do symptoms appear? The symptoms may appear one to 10 days after exposure, but usually less than four days. How is meningococcal meningitis spread? Meningococcal meningitis is spread by direct, close contact with nasal or throat discharges of an infected person. Many people carry meningococcal bacteria in their nose and throat without any signs of illness, while others may develop serious symptoms.