DOCSLIB.ORG

White Paper by Espelage

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
White Paper by Espelage T A B L E O F C O N T E N TS RISK F A C T O RS F O R A ND O U T C O M ES O F BU L L Y IN G A ND V I C T I M I Z A T I O N .«««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««« FINDIN GS FR O M T H E N A T I O N A L E DU C A T I O N ASS2&,$7,21¶6 N A T I O N W ID E ST UD Y O F BU L L Y IN G: 7($&+(56¶$1'('8&$7I O N SUPPO R T 352)(66,21$/6¶3(563E C T I V ES «.««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««11 O V E R V I E W O F C Y B E RBU L L Y IN G «««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««.21 BU L L Y IN G A ND C H I L DR E1¶63((55(/$7,216+,PS «««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««.33 E F F E C T I V E ST R A T E G I ES IN C O M B A T IN G BU L L Y IN G «««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««.43 R E DU C IN G T H E E F F E C T I V E N ESS O F BU L L Y IN G B E H A V I O R IN SC H O O LS «««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««.55 BU L L Y IN G & T H E L ESBI A N, G A Y, BISE X U A L, T R A NSG E ND E R, Q U EST I O NIN G (L G B T Q) C O M M UNI T Y «««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««.65 BU L L Y IN G A ND ST UD E N TS W I T H DISA BI L I T I ES «««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««.73 D E A R C O L L E A GU E L E T T E R: BU L L Y IN G A ND H A R ASSM E N T «««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««.83 SE C R E T A R Y O F E DU C A T I O N BU L L Y IN G L A W A ND PO L I C Y M E M O ««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««« ST OP BU L L Y IN G N O W! T IP SH E E TS ««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««« 2 Risk Factors and Outcomes of Bullying 3 RISK F A C T O RS F O R A ND idiosyncratic to individual schools and O U T C O M ES O F BU L L Y IN G A ND communities, determining accurate V I C T I M I Z A T I O N prevalence rates is spurious at best. To date, there is no longitudinal, nationally Susan M. Swearer representative assessment of bullying and University of Nebraska - Lincoln victimization in the United States. However, one study analyzed prevalence rates for No individual exists in isolation. We are all bullying and victimization across 22 products of the interaction between our countries and found that in the U.S. ELRORJ\DQGRXUHQYLURQPHQW7KH³IDWKHURI prevalence rates were 22.1% for male bully VRFLDOSV\FKRORJ\´.XUW/HZLQZURWHWKDW perpetrators; 15.1% for female bully behavior is a function of the interaction perpetrators; 23.7% for male victims; 18.8% between the individual and his or her for female victims; 10.6% for male bully- environment (Lewin, 1936). This prophetic victims; and 4.9% for female bully-victims formula holds true for our understanding of (Cook, Williams, Guerra, & Kim, 2010). bullying behavior. Individuals exist within However, until a nationally representative, multiple environments: home, school, longitudinal study on bullying and neighborhood, church, community, and victimization is conducted, prevalence rates society. Within the interaction between will reflect differences in sample individuals and these environments are risk characteristics and methodology. factors for bullying and victimization. In this paper research on risk factors for bullying Individual Risk Factors and victimization across multiple contexts-- individual, peer, school, family, community, Gender. While both girls and boys are and society will be synthesized. It is involved in bullying perpetration and important to keep in mind that these factors victimization, research has found that boys do not exist in isolation. There is no, one are involved in bullying at greater rates than single causal factor for bullying. In fact, it is girls (Cook, Williams, Guerra, Kim, & the interaction between these multiple Sadek, 2010). contexts defined as the social-ecology in which bullying and victimization unfold G rade level. Bullying has generally been (Espelage & Swearer, 2004, 2011; Swearer shown to be most prevalent in middle school & Doll, 2001; Swearer et al., 2006; Swearer (Nansel et al., 2001); however, research has et al., in press). Outcomes of bullying will suggested that bullying peaks during school be reviewed, with the call to address transition (i.e., between elementary and bullying as a social-ecological problem that middle school and between middle and high requires prevention and intervention efforts school) as youth are negotiating new peer to target the interaction between individuals groups and use bullying as a means to and their multiple environments in order to achieve social dominance (Pellegrini et al., be effective. 2011). Prevalence of bullying and victimization. Ethnicity. Involvement in bullying is a Given the vast methodological variation in cross-cultural phenomenon (Jimerson, studying bullying and victimization and the Swearer, & Espelage, 2010) and transcends fact that bullying is a phenomenon that is ethnicity. However, research has shown that 4 Risk Factors and Outcomes of Bullying students who are in the ethnic minority in a which contributes to their ability to bully school are more likely to be bullied than and manipulate others. students who are in the ethnic majority (Graham, 2006). Low academic achievement. The relationship between bullying and academic Religious orientation. Surprisingly, while achievement is complicated. Some research the media has reported on the connection has demonstrated that victims and bully between bullying and religious orientation victims do poorly in school (Glew, Fan, (i.e., Muslims in the United States), a Katon, Rivara, & Kernic, 2005), while other paucity of research on this risk factor for research has found that the connection bullying has been conducted. In a study of between being bullied and low academic 243 Hindu, Muslim, and Pakistani children achievement is more robust when there is in the U.K., 57% of boys and 43% of girls low parental support and school reported being bullied because of religious disengagement (Beran, 2008). or cultural differences (Eslea & Mukhtar, 2000). Indeed, most students report being Sexual orientation. Recent media reports bullied because they are different from the have drawn attention to youth who have normative group (Swearer & Cary, 2003). been bullied due to their sexual orientation. Research conducted with 7,261 students Socioeconomic status. Greater disparities (ages 13 to 21) in 2009 found that 84.6% of between socioeconomic status within a LGBT students reported being verbally country were associated with higher levels harassed, 40.1% reported being physically of victimization (Due et al., 2009). Other harassed and 18.8% reported being research has found that low income status physically assaulted at school in the past was a risk factor for aggression in male and year because of their sexual orientation female students (Harachi et al., 2005). (GLSEN, 2009). However, it is likely that the relationship between socioeconomic status and being Disability status. The research on bullying bullied is contextually-driven and varies toward and by students with disabilities has across communities. yielded mixed results. Some research has found that students on the autism spectrum Poor social skills. Bullying has been called are more likely to be victimized than their D³VRFLDOUHODWLRQVKLSSUREOHP´ 3HSOHU non-disabled peers (Little, 2002). Other Jiang, Craig, & Connolly, 2008). Indeed, research has found that students with victims, bully-victims, and some bullies behavior disorders are more likely to display deficits in social skills (Cook et al., perpetrate bullying, but the bullying 2010). behavior may be retaliatory, in response to being bullied (Rose, 2011). Superior social skills. However, among a subset of bully perpetrators there are Externalizing behavior. One of the DSM- students who are perceived as popular and IV-75FULWHULDIRUFRQGXFWGLVRUGHULV³RIWHQ cool (Rodkin, Farmer, Pearl, & VanAcker, EXOOLHVWKUHDWHQVRULQWLPLGDWHVRWKHUV´ 2006). For these youth, their popularity Bullying is an aggressive behavior and status affords them high social standing studies have consistently found an association between conduct problems and Risk Factors and Outcomes of Bullying 5 bullying (Cook et al., 2010). Youth who are onto school property) (Swearer et al., in bully-victims have reported the highest press). levels of conduct-disordered behavior (Kokkinos & Panayiotou, 2004). Alcohol/Drug use. The relationship between alcohol/drug use and bullying is Internalizing symptoms. Research has well-documented. In a study of middle found that bully-victims, victims, and bullies through high school students, researchers all experience depressive disorders. In one found that aggressive victims and aggressive study, 18% of bully-victims, 13% of bullies, non-victims were more likely than their non- and 10% of victims experienced depression aggressive counterparts to use drugs and (Kumpulainen, Rasanen, & Puura, 2001), alcohol (Brockenbrough, Cornell, & Loper, which is higher than the estimated 8.3% of 2002) and a study of 43, 093 U.S. adults adolescents who are diagnosed with a found that bullying was significantly depressive disorder (NIMH, 2011). Other correlated with lifetime alcohol and drug use research has supported the finding that (Vaughn, Bender, DeLisi, Beaver, Perron, & bully-victims are at the greatest risk for Howard, 2010). Thus, involvement in experiencing comorbid internalizing and bullying is related to concurrent externalizing problems (Cook et al., 2010).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Naturalistic Observations of Peer Interventions in Bullying D
    Naturalistic Observations of Peer Interventions in Bullying D. Lynn Hawkins, Debra J. Pepler, York University and Wendy M. Craig, Queen’s University Abstract This study examined peer intervention in bullying using naturalistic observations on school playgrounds. The sample comprised 58 children (37 boys and 21 girls) in Grades 1 to 6 who were observed to intervene in bullying. Peers were present during 88% of bullying episodes and intervened in 19%. In 47% of the episodes, peers inter- vened aggressively. Interventions directed toward the bully were more likely to be aggressive, whereas interventions directed toward the victim or the bully-victim dyad were more likely to be nonaggressive. The majority (57%) of interventions were effec- tive in stopping bullying. Boys were more likely to intervene when the bully and victim were male and girls when the bully and victim were female. The implications for anti- bullying interventions are discussed. Keywords: Bullying; Peer Intervention; Gender Differences In the present study, we examined peer interventions in bullying using naturalistic observations on the school playground. Bullying is a form of aggressive behaviour in which the child who is bullying has more power than the victim and repeatedly uses this power aggressively to cause distress to the victim through physical and/or verbal behaviours (Besag, 1989; Olweus, 1991, Pepler, Craig, & O’Connell, 1999). Research from various parts of the world suggests that between 10% to 23% of school children are involved in bullying as either victims and/or bullies (Besag, 1989; Charach, Pepler, & Ziegler, 1995; Olweus, 1991, 1993; Pepler et al., 1993; Roland, 1989; Yates & Smith, 1989).
    [Show full text]
  • Front Matter Template
    Copyright by Kurt Alan Gore 2007 The Dissertation Committee for Kurt Alan Gore certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Social Integration and Gender Differences in Adolescent Depression: School Context, Friendship Groups, and Romantic Relations Committee: Robert Crosnoe, Supervisor R. Kelly Raley Debra Umberson Shannon Cavanagh Elizabeth Vandewater Social Integration and Gender Differences in Adolescent Depression: School Context, Friendship Groups, and Romantic Relations by Kurt Alan Gore, B.S.; M.Ed.; M.S. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin August 2007 Dedication This dissertation is dedicated to my grandparents, Cleo and Dee Gore, with all my love. Acknowledgements A Latin proverb reminds us that if the wind will not serve, take to the oars. This dissertation is definitely the product of much rowing. But thankfully, I was not the only one on the ship. I am indebted to so many at The University of Texas and The Population Research Center for their support and guidance. I would like to give special thanks to all of my wonderful committee members, Robert Crosnoe, Kelly Raley, Debra Umberson, Shannon Cavanagh, and Elizabeth Vandewater, who were always available to offer assistance. I would also especially like to thank Kelly Raley for the outstanding methodological instruction I received as her NICHD trainee. Furthermore, I cannot thank Robert Crosnoe enough for his tireless mentorship. Without his direction and motivation, the completion of this dissertation would have been impossible.
    [Show full text]
  • Bullying Prevention Grade 7
    CARFLEO•ICE/OCCB•CCC•EOCCC•NOCCC Family Life Education Supplementary Resources 2007 Bullying Prevention Grade 7 UNIT OVERVIEW Duration: Activating Prior Knowledge mini lessons; 4 Main Lessons Lesson Titles 1) Activating Prior Knowledge a) Mini Lessons 2) Each One Created in God’s Image 3) The Biblical Norms 4) Diversity 5) On Human Dignity BACKGROUND FOR THE TEACHER Part A: Universal Perspectives The Bullying Phenomenon Is On the Rise The earliest research into bullying was conducted in Norway in the early 1990’s by Dan Olweus who described the phenomenon of bullying as “intentional, repeated, hurtful acts of aggression, characterized by a real or perceived power imbalance, committed by one or more persons against another.”1 There is a growing body of international research, supported by rather alarming statistics that reveal bullying as a significant problem amongst school-aged children, despite educator’s best efforts to combat it. Boys typically get involved in overt and physical bullying tactics, while girls tend to engage in more subtle, indirect attacks, aimed at disrupting friendships or isolating peers. Name-calling, malicious rumours, gossip, and social alienation are common forms of emotional or psychological bullying.2 Bullying is a unique and insidious form of violence In 2005, the Government of Ontario’s Safe School Action Plan defined bullying as “a dynamic of unhealthy interaction. It is a form of repeated aggression used from a position of power. It can be physical, verbal or social.”3 Bullying has also been described as “a multi-dimensional construct and occurs when one experiences repeated attacks, over time, by one or more individuals who systematically abuse their power.
    [Show full text]
  • Bullying in Schools
    Bullying in schools Bullying in schools: How successful can interventions be? is the first com- parative account of the major intervention projects against school bully- ing that have been carried out by educationalists and researchers since the 1980s, across Europe, North America, and Australasia. Bullying in schools has become an international focus for concern. It can adversely affect pupils and in extreme cases lead to suicide. Schools can take action to reduce bullying and several programmes are available but do they work? In fact, success rates have been very varied. This book sur- veys thirteen studies and eleven countries. Working on the principle that we can learn from both successes and failures, it examines the processes as well as the outcomes, and critically assesses the likely reasons for success or failure. With contributions from leading researchers in the field, Bullying in schools is an important addition to the current debate on tackling school bullying. . is Professor of Psychology and Head of the Unit for School and Family Studies at Goldsmiths College, University of London. He is the editor of Violence in schools: The response in Europe (2003) and co-editor of several other books on bullying in schools, including The nature of school bullying: A cross-national perspective (1999). is Professor of Psychology at York University, Toronto, Canada, and Senior Research Associate at the Hospital for Sick Chil- dren. She is co-editor of The development and treatment of childhood aggres- sion and the recent volume The development and treatment of girlhood aggression. is Adjunct Associate Professor of Social Psychology at the School of Education, University of South Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Bullying Prevention 2008-Bp-01
    NAtionAL Crime Prevention CENTRE Building the Evidence – BULLYING PREVENTION 2008-BP-01 The implications of bullying can also be very serious for Bullying Prevention: many victims. For example, male victims of bullying are five times more likely to be depressed and girls are over three NAture AND EXtent OF times more likely to be depressed than their male and female classmates (Kaltiala-Heino et al., 1999; Hawker & Boulton, Bullying in CANADA 2000). Male and female victims of bullying are more likely to exhibit symptoms of suicide (Kaltiala-Heino et al., 1999). Moreover, research suggests that the effects of bullying do What is Bullying? not disappear with time. For example, the Journal of the Bullying is characterized by acts of intentional harm, American Medical Association reports that “individuals repeated over-time, in a relationship where an imbal- formerly bullied were found to have higher levels of ance of power exists. It includes physical actions depression and poorer self-esteem at the age of 23, despite (punching, kicking, biting), verbal actions (threats, the fact that, as adults, they were no more harassed or name calling, insults, racial or sexual comments), and socially isolated than comparison adults” (Olweus, 1994, social exclusion1 (spreading rumours, ignoring, gos- as cited in Fox et al., 2003: 8). siping, excluding) (Pepler & Craig, 2000; Ma, Stewin & Bullying behaviour during childhood is closely associated Mah, 2001). Boys tend to be more likely to bully and with future anti-social behaviour in adolescence and adult- be bullied, usually in the form of a physical attack and hood. Children who bully may turn into adolescents who exhibition of aggressive behaviour.
    [Show full text]
  • Trainee Teachers' Perceptions on Cyberbullying In
    Article Trainee Teachers’ Perceptions on Cyberbullying in Educational Contexts Carmen Yot-Domínguez 1, María Dolores Guzmán Franco 2 and Ana Duarte Hueros 2,* 1 Department of Didactic and School Organization, Faculty of Education, University of Seville, C/Pirotecnia, s/n, 41013 Sevilla, Spain; [email protected] 2 Department of Pedagogy, Faculty of Education, Psychology and Sports Sciences, Avda. Tres de Marzo s/n, University of Huelva, 21007 Huelva, Spain; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 31 October 2018; Accepted: 8 January 2019; Published: 11 January 2019 Abstract: This paper analyzes the perceptions of teachers in training regarding cyberbullying in schools. The objectives of the study were: to ascertain their perceptions regarding their concern and their commitment to cyberbullying, their agreement with the measures to address it in educational contexts, as well as the assessment of their capabilities to act and the training they have received and they would like to receive; to determine if the perceptions differ according to gender, age and degree pursued and if there are relationships between the perceptions; and, to define pre-service teachers’ profiles based on perceptions. With a survey research design, 408 students from different undergraduate and graduate education-related degree programs at Spanish public universities participated. Findings highlight the coexistence of three different teacher in training profiles. All profiles exhibit a high level of concern and recognize cyberbullying as a problem. They strongly agree with all the proposed prevention and management measures. Two of the three profiles perceive themselves as highly confident and willing to respond. On the contrary, participants in the third profile do not feel confident enough to act and consider their training insufficient, coinciding with the second profile.
    [Show full text]
  • Y&V Broch. 05
    Special Conference Bullying Prevention: Promoting Relationships and Eliminating Violence in School, Clinical and Community Settings Friday, November 7, 2008 8 a.m.- 4 p.m. Victor E. Clarke Education Center South Miami Hospital U.S. 1 and SW 62 Avenue Bullying Prevention: Promoting Relationships and Eliminating Violence in School, Clinical and Community Settings Friday, November 7, 2008 Victor E. Clarke Education Center 8 a.m.-4 p.m. South Miami Hospital U.S. 1 and SW 62 Avenue ABOUT THE CONFERENCE or nearly a decade, The Melissa Institute has colla- I What should school bullying prevention programs for borated with Miami-Dade County Public Schools Pre-K-12 include? (M-DCPS) and community organizations to raise I What evidence-based interventions should be imple- F awareness and define bullying and victimization as mented and evaluated? violence prevention issues. The need to address the issues I What barriers and potential obstacles to implementation of bullying and harassment in schools has recently been should be anticipated? acknowledged by the Florida Legislature, which passed I the “Jeffrey Johnston Stand Up for All Students Act” (SB How can improving social interactions and relationship 790 CH 2008-123). Florida’s new Safe School Act man- skills reduce bullying and victimization? dates that each school district formulate and adopt a policy The Melissa Institute has brought together four prohibiting bullying and harassment in schools and on renowned experts to address these challenging questions. computers by December 1, 2008. Drs. Debra Pepler and Wendy Craig, co-directors of The M-DCPS Division of Student Services has Canada’s national bullying prevention initiative, have helped formulate the state’s model policy for bullying brought together 44 national nongovernmental organizations prevention.
    [Show full text]
  • Reducing Bullying: Meeting the Challenge
    REDUCING BULLYING: MEETING THE CHALLENGE “Everyday, over 52 million children attend 114,000 schools in the United States, and when combined with the 6 million adults working in schools, almost one-fifth of the population in the U.S. are to be found in schools on any given week” (Huang et al. 2005, p.623.) INTRODUCTION Bullying in schools is a frequent and serious problem that is often a precursor of aggressive and violent behavior. Schools, in concert with parents and community members, can significantly reduce bullying behavior. This section of the Website is designed to provide practical guidelines on how to reduce and prevent bullying behaviors. The practical "how to" guidelines are presented in six dropdown MENUS. FAQ’S FREQUENTLY ASKED QESTIONS MENU I offers INFORMATION ABOUT BULLYING MENU II highlights THE CRITICAL ROLE OF THE PRINCIPAL IN BULLY REDUCTION PROGRAMS MENU III describes ASSESSMENT PROCEDURES OF BULLYING MENU IV describes SCHOOL-WIDE POLICIES AND PRACTICES MENU V considers SPECIFIC INTERVENTIONS TO REDUCE BULLYING MENU VI provides ADDITIONAL RESOURCES OF INFORMATION ABOUT BULLYING A list of Specific Topics in the form of Frequently Asked Questions are also provided, so you can immediately look up answers to specific questions. Before we consider the specific practical suggestions a brief historical perspective on bullying interventions and a consideration of the general lessons learned from these past interventions will be presented. We conclude this introduction with a checklist of the key components of a bully prevention program, so one can see where specific practical suggestions fit into the "big picture." BRIEF HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE The first major anti-bullying intervention program in schools was conducted in Bergen, Norway in 1983 by Dan Olweus.
    [Show full text]
  • Explaining the Self: a Contextual Study of Saul Bellow, Philip Roth and Joseph Heller
    EXPLAINING THE SELF: A CONTEXTUAL STUDY OF SAUL BELLOW, PHILIP ROTH AND JOSEPH HELLER. DAVID LEON GIDEON BRAUNER PhD THESIS UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON ProQuest Number: 10044352 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest. ProQuest 10044352 Published by ProQuest LLC(2016). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 ABSTRACT I offer an exploration of the work of these three contemporary novelists, focusing on the phenomenon of self-explanation - both in the sense of justifying oneself, and o f seeking to define the nature o f selfhood. I identify three roles in which (and against which) these self-explanations take place; as writers o f comedy, as Jewish writers, and as American writers. Although these roles overlap, I treat them as distinct for the purposes o f structural clarity and contextualise them by locating them in related literary and cultural traditions. I am particularly concerned with the ambivalent attitudes that these writers display towards these roles; with the tensions between - and within - their theory and practice. The thesis is divided into three chapters, framed by an introduction and conclusion.
    [Show full text]
  • Bullying Prevention: Social Responsibility in 21St Century Schools
    Bullying Prevention: Social Responsibility in 21st Century Schools SCHEDULE Friday, November 19, 2010 8:00 a.m. Registration and Continental Breakfast 8:30 a.m. Opening Remarks and Welcome Randy Lee, COO, Baptist Children’s Hospital 8:35 a.m. Introductions - Suzanne L. Keeley, Ph.D., President, The Melissa Institute Ava Goldman, Administrative Director, Special Education, Curriculum & Instruction 8:45 a.m. Lifecycle of Bullying: Why Kids Bully & Why Kids Stop Debra Pepler, Ph.D. 9:30 a.m. Cyber-Bullying: 21st Century Media in Kids’ Hands Wendy Craig, Ph.D. 10:15 a.m. Break 10:30 a.m. Empowering Bystanders: Kids Helping Kids Ron Slaby, Ph.D. 11:15 a.m. Empowering Mental Health Professionals: Creating Pathways for a Positive School Environment Kim Storey, Ed.D. 12:00 noon Buffet Luncheon & Greetings from the MDCPS District (Working Lunch) 12:30 pm. Overview of MDCPS Bullying and Harassment Policy and Programs Suzy Milano-Berrios, MSW, Ed.S., Director of Mental Health and Crisis Management Services 1:00 p.m. Local-National Conversation on Bullying Issues Panel of Experts will respond to topics and questions from District Identified Personnel: Wendy Craig, Ph.D., Debra Pepler, Ph.D., Ron Slaby Ph.D., Kim Storey, Ed.D., Suzy Milano-Berrios, MSW, Ed.S. 2:00 p.m. Activity I – Practicing Bystander Strategies 2:45 p.m. Activity II – Partnering with Teachers and Parents to Promote Social Responsibility 3:30 p.m. Putting It All Together 4:00 p.m. Adjourn Newton, MA and the Center on Media and Child Health in Children’s Hospital Boston/Harvard Medical School.
    [Show full text]
  • Ken Rigby Believes There Are Grounds for Optimism
    Bullying in schools Bullying KEN REVISED AND UPDATED Bullying is now widely recognised as a serious problem that aff ects many children in schools. It can take many forms, including direct verbal and physical harassment and indirect forms such as deliberate exclusion and the targeting of individuals using cyber technology. Continual and severe bullying can cause both short term and long term damage making it diffi cult for victims to form intimate relationships Bullying with others and for habitual bullies to avoid following a delinquent lifestyle and becoming perpetrators of domestic violence. Even though this type of abuse aff ects many of our school children, Ken Rigby believes there are grounds for optimism. Th is passionate and motivating book shows that there are ways of reducing the likelihood in schools of bullying occurring in a school and eff ective ways of tackling cases when they do occur. Using up-to-date studies, Bullying in Schools helps us to under stand RIGBY and what the nature of bullying and why it so often takes place in schools. Importantly, it examines and evaluates what schools can do to promote more positive peer relationships within the school community and to do take eff ective and sustainable action to deal with problems that may arise. Teachers, parents, school leaders, policy makers, and health professionals will fi nd it invaluable and empowering. about it Ken Rigby, PhD is a leading international expert in the fi eld of bullying. He is a psychologist and a qualifi ed teacher and guidance offi cer, currently engaged as Adjunct Research Professor and educational consultant based at the University of South Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Bullying Prevention and Intervention in the School Environment: Factsheets and Tools
    Bullying Prevention and Intervention in the School Environment: Factsheets and Tools Dr. Debra Pepler and Dr. Wendy Craig, 2014 eXAMPLE Table of Contents Introduction 1. Introduction to Bullying Prevention Facts and Tools 2. Timeline Bullying Prevention and Safe and Accepting Schools Activities. Section 1: Education 1. Bullying Defined (Fact Sheet) 2. The Difference between Bullying, Aggression and Teasing (Fact Sheet) a. Critical Questions to Identify Bullying, Aggression and Teasing (Tool) 3. Key Elements of a Whole School Approach to Prevent Bullying and Promote Health Relationships (Fact Sheet) a. Creating Community Partnerships (Tool) b. Roles and Responsibilities of Champions (Tool) c. Integrating Bullying Prevention into Classroom Learning Curriculum (Tool) d. Sample Strategies and Activities for a Whole School Approach to Bullying Prevention Section 2: Assessment 1. When and Where does Bullying Happen in Your School?: Conducting an Environmental Scan (Fact Sheet) a. Bullying Prevention Needs Assessment Checklist (Tool) b. Sample Mapping Activity: Where Does Bullying Happen in Your School? 2. Bullying Prevention Needs Assessment (Fact Sheet) a. Bullying Prevention Needs Assessment (Tool) Section 3: Prevention and Intervention 1. Principles of Bullying Prevention and Intervention (Fact Sheet) a. What to do with a child or youth who engages in bullying (Tool) 2. Scaffolding: Coaching Students Involved in Bullying (Fact Sheet) a. Strategies to Inform Scaffolding and Coaching Strategies for Children and Youth who Bully (Tool) b. Strategies to Inform Scaffolding and Coaching Strategies for Children and Youth who are Victimized (Tool) Fact sheet developed by PREVNet, www.prevnet.ca c. Sample Scaffolding Strategies for Children and Youth who Bully (Tool) d. Intervention Strategies to Scaffold and Coach Children and Youth who are Victimized (Tool) e.
    [Show full text]