DOCSLIB.ORG

Water Resources Engineering 2016

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Water Resources Engineering 2016 Water Resources Engineering 2016 CE 15015 WATER RESOURCES ENGINEERING LECTURE NOTES MODULE-II Prepared By Dr. Prakash Chandra Swain Professor in Civil Engineering Veer Surendra Sai University Of Technology, Burla Branch - Civil Engineering Semester – 5th Sem Department Of Civil Engineering VSSUT, Burla Prof P.C.Swain Page 1 Water Resources Engineering 2016 Disclaimer This document does not claim any originality and cannot be used as a substitute for prescribed textbooks. The information presented here is merely a collection by Prof. P.C.Swain with the inputs of Post Graduate students for their respective teaching assignments as an additional tool for the teaching- learning process. Various sources as mentioned at the reference of the document as well as freely available materials from internet were consulted for preparing this document. Further, this document is not intended to be used for commercial purpose and the authors are not accountable for any issues, legal or otherwise, arising out of use of this document. The authors make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this document and specifically disclaim any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. Prof P.C.Swain Page 2 Water Resources Engineering 2016 COURSE CONTENTS Module – II Run off: Computation, factors affecting runoff, Design flood: Rational formula, Empirical formulae, Stream -flow: Discharge measuring structures, approximate average slope method, area-velocity method, stage-discharge relationship. Hydrograph; Concept, its components, Unit hydrograph: use and its limitations, derivation of UH from simple and complex storms, S- hydrograph, derivation of UH from S-hydrograph. Synthetic unit hydrograph: Snyder’s approach, introduction to instantaneous unit hydrograph (IUH). Prof P.C.Swain Page 3 Water Resources Engineering 2016 Lecture Note 1 Runoff 1.1 Introduction Runoff can be defined as the portion of the precipitation that makes it’s way towards rivers or oceans etc, as surface or subsurface flow. Portion which is not absorbed by the deep strata. Runoff occurs only when the rate of precipitation exceeds the rate at which water may infiltrate into the soil. 1.2 Types of Runoff • Surface runoff – Portion of rainfall (after all losses such as interception, infiltration, depression storage etc. are met) that enters streams immediately after occurring rainfall – After laps of few time, overland flow joins streams – Sometime termed prompt runoff (as very quickly enters streams) • Subsurface runoff – Amount of rainfall first enter into soil and then flows laterally towards stream without joining water table – Also take little time to reach stream • Base flow – Delayed flow – Water that meets the groundwater table and join the stream or ocean Prof P.C.Swain Page 4 Water Resources Engineering 2016 – Very slow movement and take months or years to reach streams Factors affecting runoff • Climatic factors – Type of precipitation • Rain and snow fall – Rainfall intensity • High intensity rainfall causes more rainfall – Duration of rainfall • When duration increases, infiltration capacity decreases resulting more runoff – Rainfall distribution • Distribution of rainfall in a catchment may vary and runoff also vary • More rainfalls closer to the outlet, peak flow occurs quickly • Direction of prevailing wind – If the wind direction is towards the flow direction, peak flow will occur quickly • Other climatic factors – Temperature, wind velocity, relative humidity, annual rainfall etc. affect initial loss of precipitation and thereby affecting runoff • Physiographic factors – Physiographic characteristics of watershed and channel both – Size of watershed • Larger the watershed, longer time needed to deliver runoff to the outlet • Small watersheds dominated by overland flow and larger watersheds by runoff – Shape of watershed • Fan shaped, fan shaped (elongated) and broad shaped • Fan shaped – runoff from the nearest tributaries drained out before the floods of farthest tributaries. Peak runoff is less • Broad shaped – all tributaries contribute runoff almost at the same time so that peak flow is more – Orientation of watershed • Windward side of mountains get more rainfall than leeward side – Landuse • Forest – thick layer of organic matter and undercover Prof P.C.Swain Page 5 Water Resources Engineering 2016 – huge amounts absorbed to soil – less runoff and high resistance to flow • barren lands – high runoff – Soil moisture • Runoff generated depend on soil moisture – more moisture means less infiltration and more runoff • Dry soil – more water absorbed to soil and less runoff – Soil type • Light soil (sandy) – large pores and more infiltration • Heavy textured soils – less infiltration and more runoff – Topographic characteristics • Higher the slope, faster the runoff • Channel characters such as length, shape, slope, roughness, storage, density of channel influence runoff - Drainage density • More the drainage density, runoff yield is more 1.1 Runoff Computation • Computation of runoff depend on several factors • Several methods available – Rational method – Cook’s method – Curve number method – Hydrograph method – Many more 1.1.1 Rational Method • Computes peak rate of runoff • Peak runoff should be known to design hydraulic structures that must carry it. Prof P.C.Swain Page 6 Water Resources Engineering 2016 = Peak runoff rate (m3 /s) C = runoff coefficient I = rainfall intensity (mm/h) for the duration equal to the time of concentration A = Area of watershed (ha) 1.1.1 .1 Runoff coefficient – Ratio of peak runoff rate to the rainfall intensity – No units, 0 to 1 – Depend on landuse and soil type – When watershed has many land uses and soil types, weighted average runoff coefficient is calculated ∑ 3.1.1 .2 Time of concentration (Tc ) – Time required to reach the surface runoff from remotest point of watershed to its outlet Prof P.C.Swain Page 7 Water Resources Engineering 2016 – At Tc all the parts of watershed contribute to the runoff at outlet – Have to compute the rainfall intensity for the duration equal to time of concentration – Several methods to calculate Tc – Kirpich equation L = Length of channel reach (m) S = Average channel slope (m/m) Computation of rainfall intensity for the duration of Tc Assumptions of Rational Method -Rainfall occur with uniform intensity at least to the Tc –Rainfall intensity is uniform throughout catchment Limitations of Rational Method –Uniform rainfall throughout the watershed never satisfied –Initial losses (interception, depression storage, etc). are not considered 1.1.2 Cook’s Method Computes runoff based on 4 characteristics (relief, infiltration rate, vegetal cover and surface depression) •Numerical values are assigned to each Steps in calculation •Step 1 –Evaluate degree of watershed characteristics by comparing with similar conditions Prof P.C.Swain Page 8 Water Resources Engineering 2016 Fig. (2) Numerical values for Cook’s Method Step 2 –Assign numerical value (W) to each of the characteristics •Step 3 –Find sum of numerical values assigned ΣW = total numerical value R, I, V, and D are marks given to relief character, initial infiltration, vegetal cover and surface depression respectively Step 4 –Determine runoff rate against ΣW using runoff curve (valid for specified geographical region and 10 year recurrence interval) •Step 5 –Compute adjusted runoff rate for desired recurrence interval and watershed location =P.R.F.S = Peak runoff for specified geographical location and recurrence interval (m3/s) P = Uncorrected runoff obtained from step 4 R = Geographic rainfall factor F = Recurrence interval factor S = Shape factor Prof P.C.Swain Page 9 Water Resources Engineering 2016 1.1.1 Curve Number Method • Calculates runoff on the retention capacity of soil, which is predicted by wetness status (Antecedent Moisture Conditions [AMC]) and physical features of watershed • AMC - relative wetness or dryness of a watershed, preceding wetness conditions • This method assumes that initial losses are satisfied before runoff is generated Q = Direct runoff P = Rainfall depth S = Retention capacity of soil CN = Curve Number •CN depends on land use pattern, soil conservation type, hydrologic condition, hydrologic soil group Fig (2) Curve Numbers Procedure •Step 1 –Find value of CN using table –Calculate S using equation Prof P.C.Swain Page 10 Water Resources Engineering 2016 –Use equation and calculate Q (AMC II) –Use correction factor if necessary to convert to other AMCs) •Three AMC conditions Fig (3) Conversion Factor AMC I –Lowest runoff generating potential –dry soil •AMC II –Average moisture status •AMC III –Highest runoff generating potential –saturated soil •Soil A –low runoff generating potential, sand or gravel soils with high infiltration rates •Soil B –Moderate infiltration rate, moderately fine to moderately coarse particles •Soil C –Low infiltration rate, thin hard layer prevents downward water movement, moderately fine to fine particles •Soil D –High runoff potential due to very low infiltration rate, clay soils Classification of Streams •Based on flow duration, streams are classified into –Perennial •Streams carry flow throughout the year •Appreciable groundwater contribution throughout the year –Intermittent •Limited groundwater contribution •In rainy season, groundwater table rises above stream bed •Dry season stream get dried –Ephemeral •In arid areas •Flow due to rainwater only •No base flow contribution Prof P.C.Swain
Load more

Recommended publications
  • (P 117-140) Flood Pulse.Qxp
    117 THE FLOOD PULSE CONCEPT: NEW ASPECTS, APPROACHES AND APPLICATIONS - AN UPDATE Junk W.J. Wantzen K.M. Max-Planck-Institute for Limnology, Working Group Tropical Ecology, P.O. Box 165, 24302 Plön, Germany E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT The flood pulse concept (FPC), published in 1989, was based on the scientific experience of the authors and published data worldwide. Since then, knowledge on floodplains has increased considerably, creating a large database for testing the predictions of the concept. The FPC has proved to be an integrative approach for studying highly diverse and complex ecological processes in river-floodplain systems; however, the concept has been modified, extended and restricted by several authors. Major advances have been achieved through detailed studies on the effects of hydrology and hydrochemistry, climate, paleoclimate, biogeography, biodi- versity and landscape ecology and also through wetland restoration and sustainable management of flood- plains in different latitudes and continents. Discussions on floodplain ecology and management are greatly influenced by data obtained on flow pulses and connectivity, the Riverine Productivity Model and the Multiple Use Concept. This paper summarizes the predictions of the FPC, evaluates their value in the light of recent data and new concepts and discusses further developments in floodplain theory. 118 The flood pulse concept: New aspects, INTRODUCTION plain, where production and degradation of organic matter also takes place. Rivers and floodplain wetlands are among the most threatened ecosystems. For example, 77 percent These characteristics are reflected for lakes in of the water discharge of the 139 largest river systems the “Seentypenlehre” (Lake typology), elaborated by in North America and Europe is affected by fragmen- Thienemann and Naumann between 1915 and 1935 tation of the river channels by dams and river regula- (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Probabilistic Extreme Flood Hydrographs That Use Paleoflood Data for Dam Safety Applications
    Probabilistic Extreme Flood Hydrographs That Use PaleoFlood Data for Dam Safety Applications Dam Safety Office Report No. DSO-03-03 Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation June 2003 Contents Page Introduction................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background..................................................................................................................................2 1.2 Objectives....................................................................................................................................4 1.3 Acknowledgements .....................................................................................................................4 Probabilistic Extreme Flood Hydrographs from Streamflow Sampling................................. 5 2.1 General Procedure .......................................................................................................................5 2.2 Example Applications................................................................................................................11 Probabilitic Extreme Flood Hydrographs Using Rainfall-Runoff Models............................ 18 3.1 General Procedure .....................................................................................................................19 3.2 Example Applications s.............................................................................................................20 Reservoir Routing
    [Show full text]
  • Stormwater Design Manual Chapter Three
    CHAPTER 3 HYDROLOGY Chapter 3 HYDROLOGY Table of Contents 3.1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 2 3.2 HYDROLOGIC DESIGN POLICIES........................................................................ 2 3.2.1 FULLY DEVELO PED CONDITIONS......................................................................... 3 3.2.2 DRAINAG E AREA ............................................................................................... 4 3.2.3 RAINFALL DATA AND INTENSITY .......................................................................... 4 3.3 TIME OF CONCENTRATION ................................................................................. 4 3.3.1 SCS METHOD................................................................................................... 5 3.3.1.1 Lag Time .................................................................................................. 5 3.3.1.2 Travel Time .............................................................................................. 5 3.3.1.3 Sheet Flow ............................................................................................... 6 3.3.1.4 Shallow Concentrated Flow....................................................................... 7 3.3.1.5 Channelized Flow ..................................................................................... 7 3.3.2 KIRPICH EQUATION ........................................................................................... 8 3.4 RATIONAL METHOD............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Impacts of a Flood Pulsing Hydrology on Plants and Invertebrates in Riparian Wetlands
    IMPACTS OF A FLOOD PULSING HYDROLOGY ON PLANTS AND INVERTEBRATES IN RIPARIAN WETLANDS A dissertation submitted to Kent State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Maureen K. Drinkard August 2012 Dissertation written by Maureen K. Drinkard B.S., Kent State University, 2003 Ph.D., Kent State University, 2012 Approved by ___Ferenc de Szalay_, Chair, Doctoral Dissertation Committee ___Mark Kershner_______, Members, Doctoral Dissertation Committee _____Oscar Rocha________, ____Mandy Munro-Stasiuk_, Accepted by _____James Blank______, Chair, Department of Biological Sciences ______Raymond Craig___, Dean, College of Arts and Sciences ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................... vi LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................. vii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................................................... x CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................ 1 Dissertation Goals ............................................................................................. 1 Definition of the Flood Pulse Concept .............................................................. 2 Ecological and economic importance ............................................................... 3 Impacts of environmental
    [Show full text]
  • Tracing Sediment Sources with Meteoric 10Be: Linking Erosion And
    Tracing sediment sources with meteoric 10Be: Linking erosion and the hydrograph Final Report: submitted June 20, 2012 PI: Patrick Belmont Utah State University, Department of Watershed Sciences University of Minnesota, National Center for Earth-surface Dynamics Background and Motivation for the Study Sediment is a natural constituent of river ecosystems. Yet, in excess quantities sediment can severely degrade water quality and aquatic ecosystem health. This problem is especially common in rivers that drain agricultural landscapes (Trimble and Crosson, 2000; Montgomery, 2007). Currently, sediment is one of the leading causes of impairment in rivers of the US and globally (USEPA, 2011; Palmer et al., 2000). Despite extraordinary efforts, sediment remains one of the most difficult nonpoint-source pollutants to quantify at the watershed scale (Walling, 1983; Langland et al., 2007; Smith et al., 2011). Developing a predictive understanding of watershed sediment yield has proven especially difficult in low-relief landscapes. Challenges arise due to several common features of these landscapes, including a) source and sink areas are defined by very subtle topographic features that often cannot be detected even with relatively high resolution topography data (15 cm vertical uncertainty), b) humans have dramatically altered water and sediment routing processes, the effects of which are exceedingly difficult to capture in a conventional watershed hydrology/erosion model (Wilkinson and McElroy, 2007; Montgomery, 2007); and c) as sediment is routed through a river network it is actively exchanged between the channel and floodplain, a dynamic that is difficult to model at the channel network scale (Lauer and Parker, 2008). Thus, while models can be useful to understand sediment dynamics at the landscape scale and predict changes in sediment flux and water quality in response to management actions in a watershed, several key processes are difficult to constrain to a satisfactory degree.
    [Show full text]
  • September 8, 2008 RUNOFF CALCULATIONS the Following
    BEE 473 Watershed Engineering Fall 2004 RUNOFF CALCULATIONS The following provide the minimum necessary equations for determining runoff from a design storm, i.e., a storm with duration ≈ to the watershed’s time of concentration. When peak flow is the critical design parameter engineers usually design for this storm duration because it represents the most intense storm (shortest duration) for which the entire watershed contributes flow to the outlet. This section emphasizes peak runoff; we will discuss design criteria for runoff volume later in conjunction with ponds, flood routing, and detention basin design A. Time of Concentration: B. Rational Method C. Curve Number Method 1. Calculating Runoff Volume 2. Synthetic Triangular Hydrograph 3. Calculating Peak Runoff (NRCS Graphical Method) September 8, 2008 BEE 473 Watershed Engineering Fall 2004 A. Time of Concentration Equations Dozens of equations have been proposed for the time of concentration. Below are four of the most commonly used that generally agree with each other within 25%. Eqs. A.3 and A.4 consistently predict longer times of concentration, especially for low runoff potentials. The following were adopted from Chow (19XX) 0.77 -0.385 Kirpich (1940): tc = 0.0078L S (A.1) where tc = time of concentration (min.) L = length of channel or ditch from headwater to outlet (ft) S = average watershed slope L1.15 Soil Conservation Service (SCS) (1972): t = (A.2) c 7700H 0.38 where tc = time of concentration (hr) L = length of longest flow path (ft) H = difference in elevation between
    [Show full text]
  • Influences on Watershed Hydrology
    Modeling Sediment Loss on Geomorphic Graded Reforestation Lands in Kentucky Geomorphic Reclamation and Natural Stream Design at Coal Mines: A Technical Interactive Forum Richard C. Warner, Carmen T. Agouridis, and Christopher D. Barton April 29, 2009 1 Sustainable Mining/Reclamation • Similar (minor changes) – Hydrology – Sediment – Water quality • chemistry • organic material • nutrients – Visual • geomorphic – land form – natural streams • forest 2 Objective • Contrast hydrologic and sediment response of two alternative head-of-hollow fill design and reclamation techniques – Traditional (compacted spoil with grass cover) – Geomorphic (landform, natural streams and Forest Reclamation Approach) 3 CURRENT FUTURE Forest Forest Cont our Mining Count our Mining Dit ch Weep Berm Dit ch Weep Berm Dit ch Dit ch Ro ck Rip-Rap Head-of-hollow Ephemeral Head-of-hollow Channel Compact ed Fill Loose-dumped Nat ural St ream Ephemeral Fill Ro ck Two Porous Rip - Rap Check Dams Channel S e d i ment Po nd Flocculat ion S e d i ment Po nd 4 Objective • Design a head-of-hollow fill that mimics the natural landform, forest, hydrology and erosion of pre-development natural Appalachian forest – peak flow – runoff volume – hydrograph characteristics – erosion rates – sediment concentration and loads 5 Key Modeling Timeframes • Natural forest • Traditional head-of-hollow fill – compacted spoil – grass vegetated cover • Geomorphic head-of-hollow – loose-dumped spoil overlays compacted fill – ephemeral and intermittent streams – forest cover 6 Key Modeling Parameters
    [Show full text]
  • Timing of Each Process Forms the Full Hydrograph
    STREAM HYDROGRAPH - PLOT OF DISCHARGE VS TIME AT ONE LOCATION DISCHARGE - VOLUME OF WATER FLOWING PAST A POINT OVER A TIME Timing of each process forms the full hydrograph The RUNOFF CYCLE - Events During Precipitation COMPONENTS OF STREAMFLOW & STREAM/AQUIFER INTERACTION Consider how the timing of these processes affect infiltration and runoff Ground Water RECHARGE is the water that reaches the water table Base Flow is the portion of stream flow from Ground Water that discharges to the stream 1 RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PRECIPITATION AND INFILTRATION Precipitation Rate Infiltration Capacity No depression storage or overland flow ration rate biifiliibecause precip rate << infiltration capacity Infilt infiltration depression storage begins to fill immediately time depression storage due to starthigh overland precip flow rate begins to fill after time t1 depression storage depression storage rate ate ate r start overland flow r overland flow overland flow Infiltration Infiltration Precipitation Precipitation infiltration infiltration time time HYDROGRAPH FOR ONE STORM @ one point DIRECT PERCIPITATION 2 To Manage Water, We Want to Know How Often a Flow Is Equaled or Exceeded DURATION CURVE - % of Time a Flow Is Equaled or Exceeded Plot of Discharge vs Probability of Occurrence To create: Rank Flows, as m, From Highest to Lowest 1 to N If 2 Values Are Equal, Assign Separate Rank P = 100 * (m/(n+1)) Normalize flow by basin area to compare basins of different size More severe floods e. g. crystalline rock, very little soil, poor infiltration,These rapid can be generated runoff, high peak flows, low basefor any flows type of flow: Moderateaverage conditions annual, in averageglacial outwash daily, with good infiltrationlow flow, peak but rapidflow, etcthrough Q___ flow, moderate peak and base flows BasinArea Mild floods e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • First Flush Study 1999-2000 Report
    First Flush Study 1999-2000 Report June 2000 CTSW-RT-00-016 Contents Executive Summary Section 1 Introduction .................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Background ...............................................................................................................1-1 1.2 Overview of the First Flush Study .........................................................................1-1 1.2.1................................................................................................. Program Objective 1-1 1.2.2.......................................................................................................... Study Design 1-2 1.3 Report Organization.................................................................................................1-2 Section 2 Monitoring Locations and Equipment..................................................... 2-1 2.1 Monitoring Locations...............................................................................................2-1 2.2 Monitoring Equipment ............................................................................................2-6 Section 3 Sampling Handling, Analytical Methods, and Procedures................. 3-1 3.1 Storm Water Sampling.............................................................................................3-1 3.2 Wet Weather Response ............................................................................................3-1 3.3 Key Water Quality Constituents ............................................................................3-3
    [Show full text]
  • 28. AC20 Penright
    Downstream Sediment Interception A Unique Application for Proprietary Best Management Practice (BMP) Technology Peter Enright My Background Role at • Civil Site and Infrastructure Group • 6.5 years in the water/engineering industry • Design of water/wastewater/stormwater infrastructure • Master planning and hydraulic/hydrologic modelling Today’s Presentation Outline • Rainfall, Runoff and Water Quality • Downstream Structural BMP Application • Regulation of Sediment Removal and Sizing BMPs • Alternative Analysis Methodology • Conclusions Rainfall, Runoff and Water Quality Catchment Response Storm Event Surface Runoff Stormwater • Total Depth • Cover Type • Hydrology of Rainfall • Topography • Inlet Types • Distribution • Infiltration • Land Use Over Time • Connectivity • Pretreatment Hyetograph Hydrograph Catchment Response Examples Parking Lot Catchment Response Examples Sports Field Water Quality Overview Typical Stormwater Pollutants • Sediment AKA Total Suspended Solids (TSS) • Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Chloride, and Hydrocarbons • Micro-organisms and Toxic Organics Predicting Water Quality Factors Effecting Stormwater Pollutant Load • Land Use/Type of Pollutants Present • Frequency of Cleaning/Flushing Rainfall • Hydrology and Treatment Train • Intensity and Duration of Rainfall Event Concept of “First Flush” ➢ Pollutant concentration varies over time Unique BMP Application Existing Upstream Catchment Area Minimal TSS removal Opportunity Downstream Intercept upstream TSS • Retroactive treatment • Minimize downstream maintenance Regulation
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Predicting the Outflow Hydrograph from A
    HydroVision International 2013 -- Denver, CO -- July 23-26, 2013 PREDICTING THE OUTFLOW HYDROGRAPH FROM A POTENTIAL POWER CANAL BREACH Tony L. Wahl1 ABSTRACT Many small hydropower developments utilize open canals that carry a risk for failure and consequent flooding, so project owners and operators need the ability to predict the characteristics of canal breach floods. A program of physical model tests and numerical unsteady-flow simulations has led to the development of appraisal-level tools for predicting canal-breach hydrographs. The procedures yield estimates of the time needed for initiation and development of a breach, the magnitude of the peak outflow, and the duration of the recession limb of the flood hydrograph. These tools can help identify reaches that have the potential to produce floods with serious consequences. This can aid emergency planning and help to prioritize the need for more detailed investigations and preventive management actions. This paper demonstrates the use of the method and illustrates the importance of key input parameters, especially the erodibility of the embankment soil. Keywords: breaching, canal failure, embankments, hydraulic modeling, outflow hydrographs INTRODUCTION The Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) is responsible for more than 8,000 miles of canals in the western U.S., most conveying irrigation water and a few associated with hydropower and pumped-storage developments. Failures of irrigation canal embankments have occurred periodically throughout Reclamation’s operating history. When these canals were constructed, most adjacent lands were primarily agricultural or undeveloped. Development of adjacent lands over time has led to greater interest in understanding the potential impacts and consequences of canal embankment failures on surrounding areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Controls on Thermal Discharge in Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 2007 CONTROLS ON THERMAL DISCHARGE IN YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK, WYOMING Jacob Steven Mohrmann The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Mohrmann, Jacob Steven, "CONTROLS ON THERMAL DISCHARGE IN YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK, WYOMING" (2007). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 1239. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/1239 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CONTROLS ON THERMAL DISCHARGE IN YELLOWSTONE NATIONAL PARK, WYOMING By Jacob Steven Mohrmann B.A. Environmental Science, Northwest University, Kirkland, WA, 2003 Thesis presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Science in Geology The University of Montana Missoula, MT Fall 2007 Approved by: Dr. David A. Strobel, Dean Graduate School Dr. Nancy Hinman Committee Chair Dr. William Woessner Committee Member Dr. Solomon Harrar Committee Member Mohrmann, Jacob, M.S., Fall 2007 Geology Controls on Thermal Discharge in Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming Director: Nancy W. Hinman Significant fluctuations in discharge occur in hot springs in Yellowstone National Park on a seasonal to decadal scale (Ingebritsen et al., 2001) and an hourly scale (Vitale, 2002). The purpose of this study was to determine the interval of the fluctuations in discharge and to explain what causes those discharge patterns in three thermally influenced streams in Yellowstone National Park.
    [Show full text]