JA2012 Opens Today Maritime Patrol Aircraft Isbeingdelivered
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Ai2016-1 Aircraft Serious Incident Investigation Report
AI2016-1 AIRCRAFT SERIOUS INCIDENT INVESTIGATION REPORT NAKANIHON AIR SERVICE CO., LTD. J A 9 7 4 5 DIAMOND AIR SERVICE, INC. J A 3 0 D A January 28, 2016 The objective of the investigation conducted by the Japan Transport Safety Board in accordance with the Act for Establishment of the Japan Transport Safety Board (and with Annex 13 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation) is to prevent future accidents and incidents. It is not the purpose of the investigation to apportion blame or liability. Norihiro Goto Chairman, Japan Transport Safety Board Note: This report is a translation of the Japanese original investigation report. The text in Japanese shall prevail in the interpretation of the report. AIRCRAFT SERIOUS INCIDENT INVESTIGATION REPORT 1. NAKANIHON AIR SERVICE CO., LTD., BELL 206B (ROTORCRAFT), JA9745 2. DIAMOND AIR SERVICE, INC. MITSUBUSHI MU-300, JA30DA AIRCRAFT PROXIMITY OVER NAGOYA CITY AICHI PREFECTURE JAPAN AT AROUND 11:22 JST, OCTOBER 10, 2012 January 8, 2016 Adopted by the Japan Transport Safety Board Chairman Norihiro Goto Member Shinsuke Endoh Member Toshiyuki Ishikawa Member Sadao Tamura Member Yuki Shuto Member Keiji Tanaka SYNOPSIS <Summary of the Accident> A serious incident investigation was conducted in response to the submission of a Near Collision report on October 10, 2012 in accordance with the provisions of Article 76-2 of the Civil Aeronautics Law, and Article 166-5 of the Ordinance for Enforcement of the Civil Aeronautics Regulation by the Pilot-in-command of BELL 206B, registered JA9745, owned by the Nakanihon Air Service Co., Ltd., to the Minister of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism. -
WP27 JASMA LTHM Burden Estimate Update.Pdf
RASMAG/21−WP27 14-17/06/2016 International Civil Aviation Organization The Twentieth Meeting of the Regional Airspace Safety Monitoring Advisory Group (RASMAG/21) Bangkok, Thailand, 14-17 June 2016 Agenda Item 5: Airspace Safety Monitoring Activities/Requirements in the Asia/Pacific Region JASMA LTHM BURDEN ESTIMATE UPDATE (Presented by Japan) SUMMARY This paper presents the current monitoring burden for aircraft registered and operated by Japan to meet Annex 6 requirements as of May 2016. 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 As agreed at the RASMAG/16 meeting, each RMA shall develop monitoring burden tables using the format presented in RASMAG/16/WP17. JASMA presents the current update to that data. 2. DISCUSSION 2.1 The data is based on a review of the current RVSM approvals data for JASMA is responsible for taking into account completed successful monitoring activity. 2.2 A review of the most recent RVSM approvals databases maintained by the JASMA determined that the total number of RVSM approved airframes was 746 as of 31 May 2016. 2.3 Applying the minimum monitoring requirements (MMR) to the total of approved aircraft results in a total monitoring burden to be achieved of 148 airframes. Taking into account the aircrafts already successfully monitored, the current outstanding burden is 14 airframes (9.5%). JASMA reported at the last RASMAG/20 meeting that the total number of RVSM approved airframes was 727 and the total monitoring burden was 139. Taking into account the airframe already successfully monitored was 14 (10%). Compared with this the ratio of the remaining number of monitoring has improved 0.5%. -
Air Niugini A310 324 0378 N853CH N Air Nuigini B763 300 24541
Search this document by holding down the Ctrl key on your keyboard then F (Ctrl + F). In the "Find What" text box, type in your specific criteria and click July 20, 2012 "Find". RVSM Approvals / PARMO* Including all AGHME monitoring flights for ACY 30 Apr 12; CLE, ICT, PHX, YOW 14 Jul 12;YQL, 6 Feb 12; (excluding 12 Dec 05 - 30 Jan 06 ). *All Aircraft present in this segment of the database have obtained rvsm airworthiness approval ** Please note that the AGHME data is based on the Julian date. In some cases, monitoring flights can show up on the calendar date after or date before the actual monitoring flight. *** Explanation of Full Approval column: “True” and “False” only address whether the Database staff has processed information showing the operator/aircraft combination to have RVSM authorization (e.g., an LOA). The FAA does not use this database to grant or deny clearance into RVSM airspace. Last Successful Last GMU AGHME OpName Type Series Ser No Reg No Full Approval Monitoring Monitoring Air Niugini A310 324 0378 N853CH N Air Nuigini B763 300 24541 P2ANA Y Air Atlanta Icelandic B742 200 22669 TFARH Y Air Atlanta Icelandic B742 200 23711 TFATX Y Air Atlanta Icelandic B742 230SF 23393 TFAMH Y Air Atlanta Icelandic B742 236 22304 TFAAB Y Air Atlanta Icelandic B742 236 22442 TFAAA Y Air Atlanta Icelandic B742 236SF 23735 TFARJ Y Air Atlanta Icelandic B742 243SF 23476 TFAMD Y Air Atlanta Icelandic B743 312B 23028 TFAMK Y B743 312B 23030 TFAMJ Air Atlanta Icelandic B743 312B 23032 TFAME Y Air Atlanta Icelandic B743 341 24107 TFATI Y -
ANNUAL REPORT 2014 Year Ended March 31, 2014
WE SUPPORT AVIATION INDUSTRY ANNUAL REPORT 2014 WWW.afc-group.jp/english/ Year Ended March 31, 2014 AIRPORT FACILITIES CO., LTD. Sogo Building No. 5, 1-6-5 Haneda Airport, Ota-ku, Tokyo 144-0041 TEL: 81-3-3747-0251 FAX: 81-3-3747-0225 AIRPORT FACILITIES CO., LTD. Top Message Major airline companies in Japan plan to expand their business according to the increase in demand for Hangar in Kobe Airport Airport Facilities Co., Ltd. and Airbus Helicopters international ights. On the other hand, full-edged participation by foreign airline companies in the Japan won the FY2013 Encouragement Prize awarded by the Japan Aeronautical Engineer’s international passengers market in the Tokyo Metropolitan Area has made competition there increasingly Association for its improvement DVD operation in the hangar we constructed in Kobe Airport. severe. Even in the domestic market where emerging companies are actively expanding their business and the price of fuel oil is hovering at a high level, legacy airline companies are striving to further reduce cost. Under these circumstances, Airport Facilities Co., Ltd. has been providing airport-related facilities ights meeting the increasing demand related to international ights at Tokyo International Airport. We have been oering a factory for in-ight meals on international ights since this March followed by a factory catering in-ight meals. The company is also actively working to meet the needs for additional crew training facilities. Currently, the national government is conducting a survey on fundamental factors essential for further increasing the handling capacity at the airports in the Tokyo Metropolitan Area. -
WP20 JASMA LTHM Burden Estimate Update.Pdf
RASMAG/18−WP20 01-04/04/2013 International Civil Aviation Organization The 18th Meeting of the Regional Airspace Safety Monitoring Advisory Group (RASMAG/18) Bangkok, Thailand, 01 – 04 April 2013 Agenda Item 5: Airspace Safety Monitoring Activities/Requirements in the Asia/Pacific Region JASMA LTHM BURDEN ESTIMATE UPDATE (Presented by Japan) SUMMARY This paper presents the current monitoring burden for aircraft registered and operated by Japan to meet Annex 6 requirements as of February 2013. This paper relates to – Strategic Objectives: A: Safety – Enhance global civil aviation safety Global Plan Initiatives: GPI-2 Reduced vertical separation minima 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 As agreed at the RASMAG/16 meeting, each RMA shall develop monitoring burden tables using the format presented in RASMAG/16/WP17. JASMA presents the current update to that data. 2. DISCUSSION 2.1 The data is based on a review of the current RVSM approvals data for JASMA is responsible for taking into account completed successful monitoring activity. 2.2 A review of the most recent RVSM approvals databases maintained by the JASMA determined that the total number of RVSM approved airframes was 654 as of February 5, 2013 (Appendix A). 2.3 Applying the minimum monitoring requirements (MMR) to the total of approved aircraft results in a total monitoring burden to be achieved of 114 airframes. Taking into account the aircrafts already successfully monitored, the current outstanding burden is 29 (25%) airframes. JASMA reported at the last meeting that the total number of RVSM approved airframes was 523 and the total monitoring burden was 97. Taking into account the aircraft already successfully monitored was 35 (36%). -
Aeromart Nagoya 2019 Participants List
AEROMART NAGOYA 2019 PARTICIPANTS LIST COMPANY NAME COUNTRY BOOTH № AC ISHIKAWA (ISHIKAWA SUNRISE INDUSTRIES CREATION Japan B7-B9 ORGANIZATION) ACITURRI AERONAUTICA S.L.U. Spain D38 AD'OCC, INVEST & TRADE IN OCCITANIE REGION France B32 ADZ NAGANO GMBH Germany E15 AERO COTEC CORPORATION South Korea F41 AERO GROUP Japan B48-B50 AERO METALS ALLIANCE UK E20-E22 AEROSPACE IIDA Japan A32 AEROSPACE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Taiwan * (AIDC) AEROSPACE SYSTEMS & COMPONENTS, INC. USA * AEROSPACE VALLEY France B30 AICHI-NAGOYA AEROSPACE CONSORTIUM Japan A46 AIRBUS GROUP France C42 AIRBUS JAPAN Japan C42 AIRBUS OPERATIONS SAS France * AIRCRAFT PARTS MANUFACTURING COOPERATIVE Japan A16 AIRCRAFT PHILIPP GROUP Germany D16 ALL NIPPON AIRWAYS CO., LTD. Japan * ALPHACASTING INC. Canada E29 AMDIE - MOROCCAN INVESTMENT & EXPORT DEVELOPMENT Marroc B36 AGENCY APC AEROSPECIALTY INC. Japan B19 ASAHI KINZOKU KOGYO INC. Japan B31 ASAHI- SEIKI MANUFACTURING CO., LTD. Japan C46 ASP AERO South Korea F31 ATSUTA KIGYO CO., LTD Japan A35 BCI AEROSPACE France E1 BOMBARDIER AVIATION Canada * BSI GROUP JAPAN K.K. Japan F26 C&LEE South Korea F39 CETIM France C8 CHUBU AEROSPACE INDUSTRIES Japan A51-A53 CHUNG HSIN ELECTRIC & MACHINERY MFG CORP. Taiwan D28 COMMITTEE FOR AVIATION AND SPACE INDUSTRY Taiwan * DEVELOPMENT 1 * no booth COMPOSITES TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH MALAYSIA (CTRM) Malaysia C11 COTESA / MURAKAMI JITSUGYO Germany E17 DAEHWA AEROSPACE INDUSTRIES CO., LTD South Korea E32 DAHER AEROSPACE France B26 DAIDO DIE & MOLD STEEL SOLUTIONS CO., LTD. Japan F28 DAIKI SANGYO -
Tokyo Aerospace Symposium 2015
Tokyo Aerospace Symposium 2015 Oct.14 (Wed.) - Oct.16 (Fri.), 2015 10:00~17:00 Tokyo Aerospace Tokyo Big Sight West Hall 4 Symposium 2015 Final Report Contact ORGANIZERS: Tokyo Metropolitan Government, Tokyo Big Sight Inc. Tokyo Big Sight Inc. Tokyo Aerospace Symposium 2015 Management ofce 3-11-1, Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo 135-0063, Japan Tel: +81-3-5530-1324 Fax: +81-3-5530-1222 http://www.tokyoaerospace-sympo.com E-mail: [email protected] Tokyo Aerospace Symposium 2015 Outline Index EVENT NAME Tokyo Aerospace Symposium 2015 CONCURRENT Security & Safety Trade Expo (RISCON TOKYO) 2015, SHOWS Special Equipment Exhibition & Oct.14 (Wed.) - Oct.16 (Fri.), 2015 Conference for Anti-Terrorism (SEECAT) ’15 PERIOD ■ Index...............................................................................1 10:00~17:00 ■ Results of the visitor questionnaire, Number of visitors ...2 ADMISSION JPY 2,000 VENUE Tokyo Big Sight West Hall 4 FEE (Free for those who present invitations or preregister online) ■ Results of the visitor questionnaire ................................3 ■ Visitors List.....................................................................4 ORGANIZERS Tokyo Metropolitan Government / Exhibit 265 companies/organizations, Tokyo Big Sight Inc. Scale 251 booths (Including co-exhibitiors) ■ Floor Map, Exhibitors List ...........................................5,6 ■ Special Program「Unmanned Aircraft Systems Zone」 SUPPORTING Office of National Space Policy Cabinet Office,Japan / Ministry of Education,Culture,Sports,Science and -
Chapter 2 Aircraft Accident and Serious Incident Investigations
Chapter 2 Aircraft accident and serious incident investigations Chapter 2 Aircraft Cacheaccident第2章 and航空事故等調査活動 serious incident investigations 1. Aircraft accidents and serious incidents to be investigated <Aircraft accidents to be investigated> ◎ Paragraph 1, Article 2 of the Act for Establishment of the Japan Transport Safety Board (Definition of aircraft accident) The term "Aircraft Accident" as used in this Act shall mean the accident listed in each of the items in paragraph 1 of Article 76 of the Civil Aeronautics Act. ◎ Paragraph 1, Article 76 of the Civil Aeronautics Act (Obligation to report) 1. Crash, collision or fire of aircraft; 2. Injury or death of any person, or destruction of any object caused by aircraft; 3. Death (except those specified in Ordinances of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism) or disappearance of any person on board the aircraft; 4. Contact with other aircraft; and 5. Other accidents relating to aircraft specified in Ordinances of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism. ◎ Article 165-3 of the Ordinance for Enforcement of the Civil Aeronautics Act (Accidents related to aircraft prescribed in the Ordinances of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism under item 5 of the paragraph1 of the Article 76 of the Act) The cases (excluding cases where the repair of a subject aircraft does not correspond to the major repair work) where navigating aircraft is damaged (except the sole damage of engine, cowling, engine accessory, propeller, wing tip, antenna, tire, brake or fairing). <Aircraft serious incidents to be investigated> ◎ Item 2, Paragraph 2, Article 2 of the Act for Establishment of the Japan Transport Safety Board (Definition of aircraft serious incident) A situation where a pilot in command of an aircraft during flight recognized a risk of collision or contact with any other aircraft, or any other situations prescribed by the Ordinances of Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism under Article 76-2 of the Civil Aeronautics Act. -
Ja2012 Reports
2012 Japan International Aerospace Exhibition JA2012 REPORTS SJAC (The Society of Japanese Aerospace Companies) 2012 Japan International Aerospace Exhibition (JA2012) Topics! ■ Great success with numbers of Companies,countries as exhibitors and vistors more than expected! ■ 199 overseas companies and organizations paticipated in the exhibition (increased 30% compared with previous exhibition) for promoting further international business ! ■ 3,497 business meeting were conducted in 2 days utilizing the BCI systems ! ■ 15 Theme of Business Seminars (90 lecturers) were held! ■ Almost Japanese clusters joined the Exhibition in cooperation with Japan Aerospace Industry Forum (JAIF) and local government. ■ Exhibition at International airport was held for the first time in 29 years! ■ Media Coverage including 67 on TV, 153 on newspapers and other media during before 4 mounth ! ■ There was no accident nor medical crisis with 160,000 visitors during this exhibition! ■ Eurocopter S.A.S press released the order of one EC135 and seven AS350B3e’s, Link Inc., the purchase of three ATR72-600’s! INDEX 2012 Japan International Aerospace Exhibition (JA 2012) Overview P1 Nagoya International Convention Center - Port Messe Nagoya P2~P3 Central Japan International Airport - Centrair P4~P5 Various Ceremonies and Communication in aerospace industries P6 JA2012 Exhibitor List (Partial Abstract) P7 B to B (No.1) - Business meetings via Organizer management P8 B to B (No.2) - Open business meetings between exhibitors P9 Seminars and Symposiums P10~P11 Public day events (Port Messe Nagoya) P12 Public day events (Central Japan International Airport - Centrair) P13 Public Relation media announcement activities -1, JA2012 Office P14 Public Relation media announcement activities -2 P15 Coverage records of major newspapers distributed in the country P16 Basic marketing data P17 2012 Japan International Aerospace Exhibition (JA2012) Overview I would like to express my sincere gratitude to all of the exhibitors and participants of the 2012 Japan International Aerospace Exhibition. -
WP21 JASMA LTHM Burden Estimate Update (Japan).Pdf
RASMAG/19−WP21 27-30/5/2014 International Civil Aviation Organization The Nineteenth Meeting of the Regional Airspace Safety Monitoring Advisory Group (RASMAG/19) Pattaya, Thailand, 27-30 May 2014 Agenda Item 5: Airspace Safety Monitoring Activities/Requirements in the Asia/Pacific Region JASMA LTHM BURDEN ESTIMATE UPDATE (Presented by Japan) SUMMARY This paper presents the current monitoring burden for aircraft registered and operated by Japan to meet Annex 6 requirements as of April 2014. 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 As agreed at the RASMAG/16 meeting, each RMA shall develop monitoring burden tables using the format presented in RASMAG/16/WP17. JASMA presents the current update to that data. 2. DISCUSSION 2.1 The data is based on a review of the current RVSM approvals data for JASMA is responsible for taking into account completed successful monitoring activity. 2.2 A review of the most recent RVSM approvals databases maintained by the JASMA determined that the total number of RVSM approved airframes was 699 as of 25 April 5, 2014. 2.3 Applying the minimum monitoring requirements (MMR) to the total of approved aircraft results in a total monitoring burden to be achieved of 127 airframes. Taking into account the aircrafts already successfully monitored, the current outstanding burden is 16 airframes (13%). JASMA reported at the last RASMAG/18 meeting that the total number of RVSM approved airframes was 654 and the total monitoring burden was 114. Taking into account the airframe already successfully monitored was 29 (25%). Compared with this the ratio of the remaining number of monitoring is improved 12%.