foods Article Comparison of Faba Bean Protein Ingredients Produced Using Dry Fractionation and Isoelectric Precipitation: Techno-Functional, Nutritional and Environmental Performance Martin Vogelsang-O’Dwyer 1, Iben Lykke Petersen 2 , Marcel Skejovic Joehnke 2 , Jens Christian Sørensen 2 , Juergen Bez 3, Andreas Detzel 4, Mirjam Busch 4, Martina Krueger 4, James A. O’Mahony 1, Elke K. Arendt 1,5,* and Emanuele Zannini 1 1 School of Food and Nutritional Sciences, University College Cork, T12 YN60 Cork, Ireland;
[email protected] (M.V.-O.);
[email protected] (J.A.O.);
[email protected] (E.Z.) 2 Department of Food Science, University of Copenhagen, 1958 Frederiksberg C., Denmark;
[email protected] (I.L.P.);
[email protected] (M.S.J.);
[email protected] (J.C.S.) 3 Fraunhofer Institute for Process Engineering and Packaging, Giggenhauser Str. 35, D-85354 Freising, Germany;
[email protected] 4 IFEU-Institut für Energie-und Umweltforschung Heidelberg GmbH, Im Weiher 10, 69121 Heidelberg, Germany;
[email protected] (A.D.);
[email protected] (M.B.);
[email protected] (M.K.) 5 APC Microbiome Ireland, University College Cork, T12 YT20 Cork, Ireland * Correspondence:
[email protected]; Tel.: +353-21-490-2064 Received: 2 February 2020; Accepted: 5 March 2020; Published: 11 March 2020 Abstract: Dry fractionated faba bean protein-rich flour (FPR) produced by milling/air classification, and faba bean protein isolate (FPI) produced by acid extraction/isoelectric precipitation were compared in terms of composition, techno-functional properties, nutritional properties and environmental impacts. FPR had a lower protein content (64.1%, dry matter (DM)) compared to FPI (90.1%, DM), due to the inherent limitations of air classification.