Equine Recurrent Uveitis – the European Viewpoint

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Equine Recurrent Uveitis – the European Viewpoint Spiess, B M (2010). Equine recurrent uveitis - the European viewpoint. In: Matthews, A; Gilger, B; Hughes, K. Equine Ophthalmology III. Cambs, UK, 50-56. Postprint available at: http://www.zora.uzh.ch University of Zurich Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich. Zurich Open Repository and Archive http://www.zora.uzh.ch Originally published at: Matthews, A; Gilger, B; Hughes, K 2010. Equine Ophthalmology III. Cambs, UK, 50-56. Winterthurerstr. 190 CH-8057 Zurich http://www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2010 Equine recurrent uveitis - the European viewpoint Spiess, B M Spiess, B M (2010). Equine recurrent uveitis - the European viewpoint. In: Matthews, A; Gilger, B; Hughes, K. Equine Ophthalmology III. Cambs, UK, 50-56. Postprint available at: http://www.zora.uzh.ch Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich. http://www.zora.uzh.ch Originally published at: Matthews, A; Gilger, B; Hughes, K 2010. Equine Ophthalmology III. Equine Veterinary Journal Supplement 37. Cambs, UK, 50-56. Equine recurrent uveitis – the European viewpoint Bernhard M. Spiess, Dr. med. vet. DACVO/ECVO Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Equine Department, Section of Ophthalmology Historical perspective Equine recurrent uveitis (ERU) has been a scourge for the equine population for many centuries and was also an important economic factor when the horse population in Europe was significantly larger than today (Bayer 1900). ERU was in many areas enzootic and the disease so prevalent, that some studs had to be closed altogether. The largest equine populations of that time were found in the armies and the great losses of horses due to ERU spurred the interest in this disease (Braun 1995). All through the Middle Ages the knowledge of the so-called oculus lunaticus was very limited and treatment usually consisted of various methods of bloodletting (Bayer 1900; Jakob 1920; Braun 1995). With the formation of the first veterinary schools in Europe in the 18th century a more scientific approach to diseases in general and to ocular diseases in particular was established. The development of veterinary ophthalmology was largely driven by the need to increase the knowledge about ERU. The advent of the first ophthalmoscope by Helmholtz in 1851 and the introduction of extracts of Bella Donna were important steps in the establishment of ophthalmology as a specialty in human and veterinary medicine (Braun 1995). Prevalence The prevalence varies with geographic location and climate and has been reported to be as high as 40% in endemic areas (Rosenfeld 1905; Möller 1910; Cross 1966). In certain river valleys in France the prevalence increased from 23% to 40% after severe flooding occurred in 1881 (Möller 1910). It was also noted, that in areas with clay soil and frequent flooding the prevalence could reach 70%, while in drier areas with chalky soil the incidence was around 5% (Jakob 1920). More recent reports documented a prevalence of 8% to 10% in western Germany (Szemes 2000; Deeg, Thurau et al. 2002). Aetiology of ERU The aetiology of ERU is still not absolutely clear today (Dwyer 2005). In a 1987 editorial, Barnett concluded that equine periodic ophthalmia was “a continuing aetiological riddle”(Barnett 1987). In earlier days heredity has been hotly disputed (Bayer 1900; Möller 1910; Lorbeer 1940). And there is still evidence of a possible genetic component to ERU (Angelos, Oppenheim et al. 1988; Alexander and Keller 1990; Dwyer, Crockett et al. 1995). There appears to be a breed predilection for the Appaloosa (Dwyer, Crockett et al. 1995). Although the total population of Appaloosas in Switzerland is not known, they are definitely over-represented in our ERU cases with 11/15 (73%) of Appaloosas diagnosed with ERU compared to 154/1115 (14%) of all other breeds combined. It was also observed that horses in low-lying wetlands tended to be more commonly affected than those in higher and drier areas (Zipperlen 1877). This view was still supported half a century later (Jones 1942; Jones 1949). Viral causes have been suspected but this has never been proven (Komar 1968; Attenburrow 1983). At one point microfilariae of Onchocerca cervicalis were thought to play a role in the aetiology of ERU, although today this seems to be rather exceptional (Gmelin 1935; Attenburrow 1983; Cook and Harling 1983; van der Velden and Schuitemaker 1985). 1 One of the first to propose Leptospira as the causative agent for ERU was Heusser in 1948 (Heusser 1948). Since then there is mounting evidence, that Leptospira sp. is at least the triggering factor for ERU (Roberts, York et al. 1952; Yager, Gochenour et al. 1952; Bryans 1955; Roberts 1958; Roberts 1969; Trap 1979; Hathaway, Little et al. 1981; Davidson, Nasisse et al. 1987; Matthews, Waitkins et al. 1987; Sillerud, Bey et al. 1987; Dwyer, Crockett et al. 1995; Wollanke, Gerhards et al. 1998; Wollanke, Rohrbach et al. 2001; Wollanke 2002; Wollanke 2004; Niedermaier, Wollanke et al. 2006; Gilger, Salmon et al. 2008) and it has been shown, that vaccination with a specific vaccine was successful in preventing new cases in an endemic horse population (Rohrbach, Hendrix et al. 2002; Wollanke 2004; Rohrbach, Ward et al. 2005). There are, however, geographical differences in the prevalence of Leptospira in the equine population (Verma, Biberstein et al. 1977; Slatter and Hawkins 1982; Matthews 1987; Dwyer, Crockett et al. 1995; Wollanke, Gerhards et al. 1998). In our own case records 79% of horses with ERU test positive for Leptospira sp. by microagglutination of aqueous and/or vitreous samples (Toemoerdy 2009). Nine different serovars of Leptospira were tested, the most common being L. grippothyphosa, followed by L. Canicola and L. bratislava (Toemoerdy 2009). ERU is most likely an immune-mediated disease initiated by various causes resulting in recurrent delayed hypersensitivity reactions at variable intervals (Spiess 1997a; Spiess 1997b; Dwyer 2005) (Deeg, Hauck et al. 2008). Recent studies give compelling evidence, that ERU is an autoimmune reaction with horses expressing the MHC haplotype, ELA-A9 being more susceptible to develop the disease (Deeg, Kaspers et al. 2001; Deeg, Thurau et al. 2002; Deeg, Hauck et al. 2007; Deeg, Raith et al. 2007; Deeg 2008). Clinical signs of ERU The many clinical signs and different manifestations of ERU have been extensively described elsewhere (Cook and Harling 1983; Spiess 1997; Dixon and Coppack 2002; Dwyer 2005) (Fig. 1). In our case load ERU is the most common form of uveitis seen in horses. The clinical presentation of ERU is variable. The vast majority of horses presented with clinical signs of anterior uveitis, which are easily recognisable by owners and referring veterinarians. Some of them may also have Panuveitis, although examination of the posterior segment is initially precluded by the intense miosis. A small number of patients exhibit a less obvious form of ERU, usually intermediate uveitis (pars planitis) with marked inflammatory changes of the posterior segment (vitreous). Since these horses exhibit less obvious clinical signs, they are usually presented because of visual deficits at a late stage of the disease. There appears to be no correlation between the form of uveitis and the Leptospira status of an individual patient (Toemoerdy 2009). The association between peripapillary choroidal degeneration (butterfly lesions) and ERU is equally unclear (Matthews, Crispin et al. 1990). In ponies experimentally infected with Leptospira sp. peripapillary chorioretinitis developed along with anterior uveitis (Williams, Morter et al. 1971). Diagnosis The diagnosis of ERU is based on the clinical signs of uveitis and a documented history of recurrent episodes of inflammation. In central Europe it is prudent to consider any equine uveitis to be ERU until proven otherwise. There are of course, other forms of uveitis, especially those associated with trauma. Blunt or sharp trauma to the eye is usually accompanied by some degree of uveitis (Habin 1994; Moore, Halenda et al. 1998; Grahn and Cullen 2000). Iridocyclitis and chorioretinitis have been seen in foals with septicaemia (Latimer and Wyman 1985). We have seen bilateral anterior uveitis in a foal with an umbilical infection and bacteraemia. Uveitis may also be the result of multi-centric neoplasms (Germann, Richter et al. 2008). Most forms of equine ulcerative keratitis are accompanied by some degree of anterior uveitis (Nasisse and Nelms 1992) 2 Therapy past and present As stated earlier, the most common form of therapy for centuries was bloodletting (Braun 1995). Bloodletting was still practised in human ophthalmology in the early 20th century for the management of chronic uveitis. Six to 8 leeches were applied to the temple of the affected side (Fuchs 1945). For a time extirpation of the third eyelid or the cartilage of the nictitans was advocated (Stietenroth 1906; Möller 1910). Hair rope was pulled under the skin below the affected eye and left there for long times to cause artificial suppuration (Zipperlen 1877; Bayer 1892; Bayer 1900). In 1900 Bayer still stated bluntly that therapy for ERU was “powerless”. The situation improved somewhat when solutions of 2-5% cocaine and/or 1-2% atropine were instilled. Adrenalin was also used topically to induce vasoconstriction and to minimize anterior chamber exudation (Möller 1910). This was certainly a less invasive approach than lancing the cornea and draining the exudate (Jakob 1920). Another form of surgical therapy for ERU was the iridectomy practised in the late 19th and early 20th century (Bayer 1900; Möller 1910). A point was made to perform this surgery under general anaesthesia, because it proved too stressful and difficult under topical cocaine anaesthesia alone. The iris was described as being “rotten” in theses cases (Jakob 1920). The surgical results were far from desirable and this form of therapy was later abandoned. Ophthalmology at the time was taught by human ophthalmologists at most European veterinary schools and not surprisingly, new insights from human ophthalmology were applied to veterinary patients.
Recommended publications
  • Equine Uveitis Lauren Hughes, DVM
    New England Equine Medical & Surgical Center 15 Members Way · Dover NH 03820 · www.newenglandequine.com · 603.749.9111 Understanding Equine Uveitis Lauren Hughes, DVM One of the most common ocular diseases affecting the horse is a condition known as uveitis. This occurs when inflammation affects the uveal tract of the eye that is composed of the iris, ciliary body and choroid. This inflammation can be caused by a variety of conditions including ocular, systemic or immune mediated disease. Fig 1. Equine Eye Cross-Sectional Anatomy Understanding Uveitis In order to better understand uveitis we need to take a closer look at the causes of this relatively common disease. 1-Ocular- Any condition that affects the eye can lead to uveitis as a secondary complication. This includes trauma, corneal ulcers, intraocular tumors, and cataracts (which cause lens-induced uveitis). 2-Systemic- Many infectious diseases can also predispose a horse to development of uveitis. These diseases can be bacterial, viral, parasitic, or neoplastic, with one of the most recognized being the bacterial disease Leptospirosis. 3-Immune Mediated- The most commonly seen presentation of uveitis is an immune mediated form known as equine recurrent uveitis (ERU) or moon blindness. This disease consists of recurrent episodes of inflammation in which the immune system targets the tissues of the eye. This can be an ongoing and frustrating condition for owners as treatment is not curative and lifelong management is often necessary. This condition has been reported to affect upwards of 25% of the horse population with increased prevalence in certain breeds including Appaloosas, draft horses, and warmbloods.1 It can affect one or both eyes, with chronicity potentially leading to permanent vision deficits or blindness.
    [Show full text]
  • Leptospirosis Associated Equine Recurrent Uveitis Answers to Your Important Questions What Is Leptospirosis Associated Equine Recurrent Uveitis (LAERU)?
    Lisa Dauten, DVM Tri-State Veterinary Services LLC " Leptospirosis Associated Equine Recurrent Uveitis Answers to your Important Questions! What is Leptospirosis Associated Equine Recurrent Uveitis (LAERU)? Let’s start by breaking down some terminology.! Uveitis- inflammation of the uvea. Resulting in cloudiness of the eye, pain, and potential blindness. Also know as “Moon Blindness”. Caused by trauma, infection, or corneal disease.! Uvea- part of the eye containing the iris, ciliary body, and choroid. It keeps the lens of the eye in place, maintains fluid in the eye, and keeps things in the blood from entering the inside of the eye (blood-ocular barrier). ! Recurrent Uveitis- inflammation of the uvea that sporadically reoccurs through out a horses life time. Each time there is a reoccurring episode, the damage to the eye is made worse, eventually leading to permanent damage and potential blindness. ! Leptospirosis- bacteria found in the environment shed in the urine of wildlife and livestock. Horses usually are exposed when grazing pastures or drinking from natural water sources.! LAERU- Recurrent Uveitis in horses caused by Leptospirosis.! What are the clinical signs of Uveitis? Uveitis can come on very suddenly. A lot of times horses present with severe pain in the eye, tearing, squinting, and rubbing face. The eye itself is cloudy, white or blue in color. Sometimes the signs are not as dramatic. The color change of the eye may progress slowly. In these cases, horse owners may mistake the changes for cataracts.! What do I do if I think my horse has Uveitis? Call your veterinarian to request an appointment.
    [Show full text]
  • Equine Recurrent Uveitis Slowly Releases Medication Over a Period of (ERU) Several Years
    Treatment ABOUT THE COLLEGE OF VETERINARY MEDICINE Treatment for uveitis in general depends upon the underlying cause as well as Ranked third in the nation among the severity of the symptoms. In most colleges of veterinary medicine by cases, the eye is treated with topical anti- U.S. News & World Report, NC State’s inflammatories and a pupil-dilating agent to College of Veterinary Medicine is a decrease the pain and inflammation. Oral driving force in veterinary innovation. anti-inflammatories such as Banamine® From our leadership in understanding (Flunixin meglumine) are also instituted, and and defining the interconnections in select cases bodily injections of steroids between animal and human health, to may be necessary. While these treatments groundbreaking research in areas like are helpful in subsiding the inflammation equine health, and our commitment to and pain - they’re not ideal for long-term training the next generation of veterinary use. If infectious disease is suspected to health professionals, we are dedicated be the cause, laboratory tests should be to advancing animal and human health performed followed by medical treatment if from the cellular level through entire recommended. ecosystems. If a horse responds favorably to medical therapy, Cyclosporine Implants may be an option for long-term management. This is the surgical implantation of a small Cyclosporine medicated disc that’s placed deep within the pink tissue surrounding the eye (sclera), it Equine Recurrent Uveitis slowly releases medication over a period of (ERU) several years. This medication modifies the reaction to the immune system and reduces NC State Veterinary Hospital Moon Blindness; Periodic Ophthalamia inflammation.
    [Show full text]
  • Immune Responses to Retinal Autoantigens and Peptides in Equine Recurrent Uveitis
    Immune Responses to Retinal Autoantigens and Peptides in Equine Recurrent Uveitis Cornelia A. Deeg,1 Bernd Kaspers,1 Hartmut Gerhards,2 Stephan R. Thurau,3 Bettina Wollanke,2 and Gerhild Wildner3 5 PURPOSE. To test the hypothesis that autoimmune mechanisms unclear. Research has focused on the identification of infec- are involved in horses in which equine recurrent uveitis (ERU) tious agents that may induce uveitis, such as bacteria, viruses, develops spontaneously. or parasites, especially on a possible role for Leptospira inter- 6–8 METHODS. Material obtained from horses treated for spontane- rogans as an initiating agent in this process. However, the ous disease by therapeutic routine vitrectomy was analyzed for concept of an infectious factor that exclusively induces and total IgG content and IgG specific for S-Antigen (S-Ag) and maintains the disease is not sufficient to explain certain aspects interphotoreceptor retinoid-binding protein (IRBP). The cellu- of the clinical course and therapeutic approaches. Because of the recurrence of inflammation,5 the positive effect of cortico- lar infiltrate of the vitreous was analyzed by differential counts 2 of cytospin preparations and flow cytometry using equine steroids, and the insufficient therapeutic success of antibiot- lymphocyte-specific antibodies. Antigen-specific proliferation ics, the concept has emerged that the disease is immune assays were performed comparing peripheral blood lympho- mediated. Therefore, ERU is of high value for studying uveitis, because horses represent the only species besides humans in cytes (PBLs) with vitreal lymphocytes by stimulation with S-Ag 9 and several S-Ag– and IRBP-derived peptides. which recurrent uveitis develops spontaneously.
    [Show full text]
  • Ocular Manifestations of Systemic Disease in the Horse
    OCULAR MANIFESTATIONS OF SYSTEMIC DISEASE IN THE HORSE L. Chris Sanchez, DVM, PhD, DACVIM Caryn Plummer, DVM, DACVO University of Florida College of Veterinary Medicine, Gainesville, FL USA Overview Many systemic inflammatory diseases in horses have ocular signs, and many ophthalmic diseases (or their treatment) can have or result in systemic signs. Thus, it is important to look at the whole horse when considering treatment plans or prognoses. Though the proceedings are organized by specific manifestations, the talk will be entirely case-based. Ocular Manifestations of Systemic Disease Neonatal sepsis/SIRS The septic foal may seed bacteria to various organs, including the eye. The first sign of septic uveitis is usually a green hue to the iris and anterior chamber as fibrin seeps out of the uveal vasculature. Additional signs of uveitis follow and typically include miosis, globe hypotony (low IOP), aqueous flare, conjunctival and episcleral injection. Occasionally hypopyon and hyphema may develop. Ocular signs may be unilateral or bilateral. Systemic antimicrobial therapy and generalized support are critical to survival. The uveitis must be addressed with symptomatic anti- inflammatory therapy if intraocular scarring is to be avoided. As long as no corneal ulcer is present, topical medical treatment should consist of corticosteroids and atropine. If tolerable, systemic flunixin will benefit the eyes. Occasionally, fibrin will completely fill the anterior chamber and be slow to resorb. If it does not improve rapidly, intracameral tissue plasminogen activator (TPA) may be very helpful to hasten its dissolution. Rhodococcus equi Ocular manifestations of R. equi include uveitis and occasionally hyphema. Signs of uveitis typically include epihora, blepharospasm, photophobia, corneal edema, miosis, aqueous flare and significant accumulations of fibrin in the anterior chamber.
    [Show full text]
  • Looking Towards Treatments for Equine Recurent Uveitis
    Vet Times The website for the veterinary profession https://www.vettimes.co.uk LOOKING TOWARDS TREATMENTS FOR EQUINE RECURENT UVEITIS Author : Claudia Hartley Categories : Vets Date : May 25, 2009 Claudia Hartley discusses a condition that, according to some estimates, can affect up to 25 per cent of horses, and reveals her opinions on care EQUINE recurrent uveitis (ERU) is an immune-mediated inflammation of one or both eyes that is relapsing and remitting in nature. Prevalence rates have been estimated to be between eight and 25 per cent in a number of studies. The first episode of uveitis typically occurs between four and eight years of age, although not exclusively. Subsequent inflammation flare-ups follow an unpredictable course, as recurrences can be seen weeks or months after quiescence from the first attack. Initially, recurrences were thought to follow the moon cycles and, therefore, the condition was originally known as moon blindness. Horses or ponies that suffer a single episode of uveitis are not considered to have ERU until a relapse is seen – in effect, until they suffer two or more episodes of uveitis. As a relapse may be seen up to two years after the first attack, the risk of developing ERU is very much less if more than two years pass without a second episode. The same is true for unilateral cases; these may become bilateral with time, but that risk is much reduced if two or more years pass without the fellow eye being affected. 1 / 22 Studies have identified a genetic susceptibility associated with equine leucocyte antigen-9 (ELA-9), similar to the association of certain human leucocyte antigen haplotypes and some autoimmune uveitides in humans.
    [Show full text]
  • Role of Intraocular Leptospira Infections in the Pathogenesis Of
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2012 Role of Intraocular Leptospira Infections in the Pathogenesis of Equine Recurrent Uveitis in the Southern United States Florence Polle Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the Veterinary Medicine Commons Recommended Citation Polle, Florence, "Role of Intraocular Leptospira Infections in the Pathogenesis of Equine Recurrent Uveitis in the Southern United States" (2012). LSU Master's Theses. 3492. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/3492 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ROLE OF INTRAOCULAR LEPTOSPIRA INFECTIONS IN THE PATHOGENESIS OF EQUINE RECURRENT UVEITIS IN THE SOUTHERN UNITED STATES A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science In The School of Veterinary Medicine Through The Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences By Florence Polle DrMedVet, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse, 2007 August 2012 To my parents, who always let me make my own choices. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS My deepest gratitude to the members of my committee, Drs. Renee Carter, Susan Eades and Rebecca McConnico, for their guidance and support during the realization of this study and the preparation of this manuscript.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Diagnose and Manage Horses with Glaucoma
    HOW-TO SESSION: OPHTHALMOLOGY How to Diagnose and Manage Horses With Glaucoma Erica L. Tolar, DVM, Diplomate ACVO*; and Amber L. Labelle, DVM, MS, Diplomate ACVO Authors’ addresses: Bluegrass Veterinary Vision, 2563 Todd’s Point Road, Simpsonville, KY 40067; e-mail: [email protected] (Tolar); University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, 1008 West Hazelwood Drive, Urbana, IL 61802; e-mail: [email protected] (Labelle). *Corresponding and presenting author. © 2013 AAEP. 1. Introduction eye and pathologic changes associated with glau- Glaucoma is a painful ocular disease that often results coma. Immediately posterior to the iris is the cili- in vision loss and can be frustrating to treat.1–4 Equine ary body, which is hidden from view by the iris face glaucoma is most often secondary to chronic, recurrent even when the pupil is fully dilated. The ciliary episodes of intraocular inflammation as occur with body processes produce aqueous humor, the clear equine recurrent uveitis (ERU).1–8 Diagnosis of glau- intraocular fluid that provides metabolic support to coma requires tonometry, or measurement of the in- the posterior cornea and the internal structures of traocular pressure (IOP). Many types of portable, the eye. Aqueous humor flows from the posterior affordable tonometers are available to the veterinary chamber, through the pupil, into the anterior cham- practitioner, and tonometry is becoming more widely ber, and drains from the eye through the uveoscleral used in equine practice. Once a diagnosis of glau- or iridocorneal outflow pathways (Fig. 1).9 The iri- coma has been established, therapy options range docorneal angle is visible as an intraocular mesh- from topical and oral medications to advanced surgical work at the temporal and nasal limbus, with procedures.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Your Eyes to Equine Uveitis
    Open Your Eyes to Equine Uveitis One of the most common eye diseases and the most common cause of blindness in horses is equine recurrent uveitis (ERU), also called moon blindness or periodic ophthalmia. Uveitis is defined as inflammation of the uveal tract of the eye, which consists of the iris and ciliary body (anterior uvea) and the choroid (posterior uvea). The clinical disease, however, involves all aspects of the equine eye. There are three general causes of uveitis in horses: ocular, systemic, and immune-mediated (ERU). Ocular causes include trauma, corneal ulcers, lens induced uveitis, or immune-mediated uveitis. Essentially any insult to the eye may result in a reflex inflammatory response within the globe itself. Systemic causes include any infectious bacterial, viral, parasitic, or associated disease that results in systemic illness. ERU is an immune-mediated uveitis that is characterized by intermittent episodes of intraocular inflammation. Contrary to ocular and systemic manifestations of uveitis, ERU is a syndrome with documented chronic recurrence of inflammatory episodes. Any horse may be affected but the Appaloosa breed seems to be predisposed to ERU. Clinical signs of uveitis in horses are primarily manifestations of ocular pain. Holding the eye partially or completely closed, excessive tearing, redness of the membranes around the eye, and swelling of the eyelids may be obvious when looking at your horse. Upon further inspection, a hazy blue cornea (corneal edema) may be visible. Because eye problems are best treated when caught early, a prompt call to your veterinarian is in order if you find your horse with a painful eye.
    [Show full text]
  • Neutrophil Extracellular Traps in the Pathogenesis of Equine Recurrent Uveitis (ERU)
    cells Article Neutrophil Extracellular Traps in the Pathogenesis of Equine Recurrent Uveitis (ERU) Leonie Fingerhut 1,2,3, Bernhard Ohnesorge 3, Myriam von Borstel 4, Ariane Schumski 1, Katrin Strutzberg-Minder 5, Matthias Mörgelin 6, Cornelia A. Deeg 7 , Henk P. Haagsman 8 , Andreas Beineke 9, Maren von Köckritz-Blickwede 1,2,* and Nicole de Buhr 1,2,* 1 Department of Physiological Chemistry, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Bünteweg 17, D-30559 Hannover, Germany; leonie.fi[email protected] (L.F.); [email protected] (A.S.) 2 Research Center for Emerging Infections and Zoonoses (RIZ), University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Bünteweg 17, D-30559 Hannover, Germany 3 Clinic for Horses, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Bünteweg 9, D-30559 Hannover, Germany; [email protected] 4 Tierärztliche Gemeinschaftspraxis für Pferde Wedemark, Lange Loh 15, D-30900 Wedemark, Germany; [email protected] 5 IVD Gesellschaft für Innovative Veterinärdiagnostik mbH (IVD GmbH), Albert-Einstein-Str. 5, D-30926 Seelze, Germany; [email protected] 6 Colzyx AB, Medicon Village, SE-223 81 Lund, Sweden; [email protected] 7 Chair of Animal Physiology, Department of Veterinary Sciences, LMU Munich, Lena Christ Str. 48, D-82152 Martinsried, Germany; [email protected] 8 Department of Infectious Diseases & Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Yalelaan 1, 3584 CL Utrecht, The Netherlands; [email protected] 9 Department of Pathology, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Bünteweg 17, D-30559 Hannover, Germany; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (M.v.K.-B.); [email protected] (N.d.B.); Tel.: +49-511-953-6119 (N.d.B.) Received: 27 October 2019; Accepted: 22 November 2019; Published: 27 November 2019 Abstract: Equine recurrent uveitis (ERU) is considered one of the most important eye diseases in horses and typically appears with relapsing inflammatory episodes without systemic effects.
    [Show full text]
  • Eye Problems in Horses
    MMVS Client Education Article: Eye Problems in Horses HELP!! My horse won’t open his eye! A painful eye in any patient is a potentially serious problem… First, the Basics - Anatomy of the Equine Eye Fig. 1: The conjunctiva is the supporting tissue that lines the inside of both eyelids and covers the sclera (1), the white part of the globe that attaches to the cornea at a junction called the limbus (X). The iris (3) is the colored part of the eye; the pupil is the space created by the inner edge of the iris (4). This is where light enters the eye; it should be horizontal in horses. The lens often looks hazy/slightly blue (right image); it turns white when cataracts form. The ‘corpora nigra’ or ‘black bodies’ are cysts found at the top edge of the iris; these are normal structures. The center of the left image is reddish orange due to reflection of light on the fundus, the back of the eye. The horse on the right has an abnormal iris – likely a congenital defect. Fig. 2: The globe is a sphere with 3 layers and 3 chambers. The sclera and cornea make up the outer layer; the uvea is the middle layer. It includes the iris and a vascular supply (or choroid); the inner layer is the retina, made up of cells called rods and cones. These are specialized cells that are activated by light. These cells transmit impulses via the optic nerve to the brain, where images are created and interpreted. The anterior chamber is a fluid filled space between the iris and the cornea; the posterior chamber is a small area behind the iris; the ‘vitreous’ is a large area behind the lens.
    [Show full text]
  • Leptospirosis in Horses: Special Reference to Equine Recurrent Uveitis
    Journal of Experimental Biology and Agricultural Sciences, December - 2016; Volume – 4(Spl-4-EHIDZ) Journal of Experimental Biology and Agricultural Sciences http://www.jebas.org ISSN No. 2320 – 8694 LEPTOSPIROSIS IN HORSES: SPECIAL REFERENCE TO EQUINE RECURRENT UVEITIS Sandip Kumar Khurana1,*, Kuldeep Dhama2, Minakshi P3, Baldev Gulati1, Yashpal Singh Malik2 and Kumaragurubaran Karthik4 1NRCE, Hisar, Haryana, India 2Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Barrielly, U.P., India 3Department of Animal Biotechnology, LUVAS, Hisar, Haryana, India 4Tamil Nadu University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India Received – August 27, 2016; Revision – September 04, 2016; Accepted – October 03, 2016 Available Online – December 04, 2016 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18006/2016.4(Spl-4-EHIDZ).S123.S131 KEYWORDS ABSTRACT Equine Leptospirosis Leptospirosis is a bacterial zoonotic disease with worldwide distribution. The disease affects several domestic and wild animals. Leptospirosis has seasonal nature with high incidence in hot rainy season ERU especially in tropical regions. The disease in horses has ocular and systemic manifestations. However, stillbirths and neonatal mortality due to this disease is also common. The ocular manifestation is equine recurrent uveitis (ERU), also known as periodic ophthalmia or moon blindness, where autoimmune mechanisms also play an important role. Several diagnostic assays are employed and microscopic agglutination test has been commonly employed in several parts of the world though isolation is the gold standard test. Recent diagnostic advances like PCR, real time PCR, LAMP also aid in early diagnosis of the disease so that the spread of disease to other animals and human can be prevented. All the article published by Journal of Experimental * Corresponding author Biology and Agricultural Sciences is licensed under a E-mail: [email protected] (Sandip Kumar Khurana) Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License Based on a work at www.jebas.org.
    [Show full text]