DOCSLIB.ORG

Federal Register/Vol. 64, No. 152/Monday, August 9, 1999/Notices

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 152 / Monday, August 9, 1999 / Notices 43211 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR bone bracelet fragments, shell rings, Pelican Lake Gravel Pit site, Pope bone beads, beaver teeth fragments, red County, MN by unknown person(s) and National Park Service ochre, and a soil sample. donated to the University of Minnesota Site 21-PL-6/13 has been identified as Geology Laboratory. No known Notice of Inventory Completion for Arvilla Complex, an archeological individuals were identified. No Native American Human Remains and culture which cannot be identified with associated funerary objects are present. Associated Funerary Objects from the any present-day Indian tribe or group. Site 21-PO-3 is associated with the State of Minnesota in the Possession In 1941, human remains representing Archaic Tradition, a broad archeological of the Minnesota Indian Affairs 37 individuals were recovered from site tradition which cannot be identified Council, Bemidji, MN 21-MU-3, Lake Shetek Mounds, Murray with any present-day Indian tribe or County, MN during an archeological group. AGENCY: National Park Service. excavation conducted by L.A. Wilford of In 1963, human remains representing ACTION: Notice. the University of Minnesota. No known a minimum of 36 individuals were recovered from site 21-DK-41, River Notice is hereby given in accordance individuals were identified. The two Hills Housing Development site, Dakota with provisions of the Native American associated funerary objects include a County, MN by V. Helmen of the Graves Protection and Repatriation Act ceramic vessel and an end scraper. Science Museum of Minnesota when (NAGPRA), 43 CFR 10.9, of the Site 21-MU-3 has been identified only they were encountered during completion of an inventory of human as Woodland, a broad archeological construction. No known individuals remains and associated funerary objects tradition that cannot be identified with were identified. No associated funerary from the State of Minnesota in the any present-day Indian tribe or group. In 1954, human remains representing objects are present. possession of the Minnesota Indian 27 individuals were recovered from site Site 21-DK-41 has been identified as Affairs Council, Bemidji, MN. 21-BW-2, Sievert Mound site, Brown possibly an Archaic site, a broad A detailed assessment of the human County, MN during an archeological archeological tradition which cannot be remains was made by the Minnesota excavation conducted by L.A. Wilfor of identified with any present-day Indian Indian Affairs Council professional staff the University of Minnesota. No known tribe or group. in consultation with representatives of individuals were identified. No In 1964, human remains representing Prairie Island Community Council, associated funerary object are present. 33 individuals were recovered from site Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Site 21-BW-2 has been identified only 21-HE-98, the Macmillan site, Hennepin Community of Minnesota, Grand as Woodland, a broad archeological County, MN during an archeological Portage Reservation Business tradition that cannot be identified with excavation conducted by K. Day of the Committee, Fond du Lac Reservation any present-day Indian tribe or group. University of Minnesota. No known Business Committee, Nett Lake In 1978, human remains representing individuals were identified. No Reservation (Bois Forte) Tribal Council, 58 individuals were recovered from site associated funerary objects are present. Upper Sioux Community of Minnesota, 21-PO-14, Noyes site, Pope County, MN Site 21-HE-98 is associated with the Lower Sioux Mdewakanton Community, during a rescue excavation conducted Woodland Tradition, a broad Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa Indians, by S. Anfinson of the Minnesota archeological tradition which cannot be White Earth Band of Minnesota Historical Society after construction had identified with any present-day Indian Chippewa, Leech Lake Tribal Council, removed a burial mound. No known tribe or group. Minnesota Chippewa Tribe, Red Lake individuals were identified. No In 1934, human remains representing Nation, Iowa Tribe of Oklahoma, Iowa associated funerary objects were 19 individuals were recovered from a Tribe of Kansas and Nebraska, Ho- present. destroyed mound in Freeborn County, Chunk Nation of Wisconsin, Santee Site 21-PO-14 has been identified MN by person(s) unknown. These Sioux Tribe of the Santee Reservation of only as Woodland, possibly Onamia, a human remains were turned over to the Nebraska, Sisseton-Wahpeton Sioux broad archeological tradition that County sheriff who donated them to the Tribe of the Lake Traverse Reservation, cannot be identified with any present- University of Minnesota. No known Yankton Sioux Tribe of South Dakota, day Indian tribe or group. individuals were identified. The three Chippewa-Cree Indians of the Rocky In 1970, human remains representing associated funerary objects include a Boy's Reservation, Turtle Mountain 27 individuals were recovered from site copper ring-pendant, pieces of turtle Band of Chippewa Indians, Assinaboine 21-SN-11, Syl Sand site, Stearns County, shell, and a chert knife. and Sioux Tribes of the Fort Peck MN during archeological excavations Based on the associated funerary Reservation and Winnebago Tribe of conducted by D. Birk and C. Tiling of objects, the human remains from Nebraska, and the non-Federally the Minnesota Historical Society. No Freeborn County are associated with the recognized Indian groups the Mendota known individuals were identified. The Woodland Tradition, a broad Mdewakanton Dakota Community and 15 associated funerary objects include archeological tradition which cannot be the Kah-Bay-Kah-Nong (Warroad two antelope antlers with pierced holes, identified with any present-day Indian Chippewa). two bird-bone flutes, beaver incisors, a tribe or group. In 1934, human remains representing quartz flake, a black stone with In 1936, human remains representing 26 individuals were recovered from site modified grooves, a clay pipe bowl, four 26 individuals were recovered from site 21-PL-6, Warner Mounds 1 and 2, also modified turtle shell squares, numerous 21-RL-1, Red Lake River Mounds, Red known as the Peter Lee Mound (21-PL- flakes, and two lithics. Lake County, MN during archeological 13) near Fertile, Polk County, MN Site 21-SN-11 has been identified as excavations conducted by A.E. Jenks of during an archeological excavation a Middle to Late Woodland site, a broad the University of Minnesota. No known conducted by A.E. Jenks and L.A. archeological tradition that cannot be individuals were identified. The 41 Wilford of the University of Minnesota. identified with any present-day Indian associated funerary objects include clam No known individuals were identified. tribe or group. shells, worked and unmodified flakes, The 15 associated funerary objects At an unknown date, human remains projectile points, worked bone, broken include an arrowshaft ``polisher'', representing 13 individuals were most bifaces, scrapers, a hafted antler-beaver projectile points, a shell bead necklace, likely removed from site 21-PO-3, the tooth tool, shell beads, black quartz, a VerDate 18-JUN-99 18:08 Aug 06, 1999 Jkt 183247 PO 00000 Frm 00073 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\09AUN1.XXX pfrm03 PsN: 09AUN1 43212 Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 152 / Monday, August 9, 1999 / Notices spiral shell pendant, a small core, laboratory at Hamline University by an of the Minnesota Indian Affairs Council worked shell, a moose metapodial tool, unknown person. No known individual following their disturbance during elk antler tool, three blades, a was identified. No associated funerary construction. No known individuals hammerstone, a slate tool, a knife, and objects are present. were identified. No associated funerary a maul. Site 21-AN-16 has been identified as objects were present. Site 21-RL-1 has been identified as part of the Woodland Tradition, a broad Site 21-BK-37 has no archeological Arvilla Complex, an archeological archeological tradition which cannot be classification and cannot be associated culture which cannot be associated with identified with any present-day Indian with any present-day Indian tribe or any present-day Indian tribe or group. tribe or group. group. In 1932, human remains representing At an unknown date, human remains At an unknown date, human remains ten individuals were recovered from site representing four individuals were representing one individual were 21-CW-1, Pine River Mounds site, Crow recovered form 21-OT-78, Clitheral site, removed from Traverse County, MN by Wing County, MN during archeological Otter Tail County, MN by unknown W. Jensen and donated to the Minnesota excavations conducted by A.E. Jenks of person(s) and donated to the Minnesota Indian Affairs Council by J. Presley. No the University of Minnesota. No known Indian Affairs Council's laboratory at known individual was identified. No individuals were identified. No Hamline University. No known associated funerary objects are present. associated funerary objects were individuals were identified. No These human remains from Traverse present. associated funerary objects are present. County have no archeological Site 21-CW-1 has been identified as Site 21-OT-78 has been identified as classification and cannot be associated part of the Woodland Tradition, a broad part of the Archaic Tradition, a broad with any present-day Indian tribe or archeological tradition which cannot be archeological tradition which cannot be group. identified with any present-day Indian identified with any present-day Indian During the 1940s, human remains tribe or group. tribe or group. representing one individual were In 1961, human remains representing At an unknown date, human remains removed from a WPA road construction 11 individuals were recovered from site representing four individuals from site site near Sauk Centre, Stearns County, 21-WN-15, Vaigt or Voight site, Winona 21-DL-72, Burkey Farm, Douglas MN and donated to the University of County, MN during archeological County, MN were removed following Minnesota. No known individual was excavations conducted by T. Fiske and their disturbance during construction.
Recommended publications
  • University of Michigan Radiocarbon Dates Xii H

    University of Michigan Radiocarbon Dates Xii H

    [Ru)Ioc!RBo1, Vol.. 10, 1968, P. 61-114] UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN RADIOCARBON DATES XII H. R. CRANE and JAMES B. GRIFFIN The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan The following is a list of dates obtained since the compilation of List XI in December 1965. The method is essentially the same as de- scribed in that list. Two C02-CS2 Geiger counter systems were used. Equipment and counting techniques have been described elsewhere (Crane, 1961). Dates and estimates of error in this list follow the practice recommended by the International Radiocarbon Dating Conferences of 1962 and 1965, in that (a) dates are computed on the basis of the Libby half-life, 5570 yr, (b) A.D. 1950 is used as the zero of the age scale, and (c) the errors quoted are the standard deviations obtained from the numbers of counts only. In previous Michigan date lists up to and in- cluding VII, we have quoted errors at least twice as great as the statisti- cal errors of counting, to take account of other errors in the over-all process. If the reader wishes to obtain a standard deviation figure which will allow ample room for the many sources of error in the dating process, we suggest doubling the figures that are given in this list. We wish to acknowledge the help of Patricia Dahlstrom in pre- paring chemical samples and David M. Griffin and Linda B. Halsey in preparing the descriptions. I. GEOLOGIC SAMPLES 9240 ± 1000 M-1291. Hosterman's Pit, Pennsylvania 7290 B.C. Charcoal from Hosterman's Pit (40° 53' 34" N Lat, 77° 26' 22" W Long), Centre Co., Pennsylvania.
  • Moorhead Ph 1 Final Report

    Moorhead Ph 1 Final Report

    Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Ecological Assessment of a Wetlands Mitigation Bank August 2001 (Phase I: Baseline Ecological Conditions and Initial Restoration Efforts) 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Kevin K. Moorhead, Irene M. Rossell, C. Reed Rossell, Jr., and James W. Petranka 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Departments of Environmental Studies and Biology University of North Carolina at Asheville Asheville, NC 28804 11. Contract or Grant No. 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered U.S. Department of Transportation Final Report Research and Special Programs Administration May 1, 1994 – September 30, 2001 400 7th Street, SW Washington, DC 20590-0001 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 15. Supplementary Notes Supported by a grant from the U.S. Department of Transportation and the North Carolina Department of Transportation, through the Center for Transportation and the Environment, NC State University. 16. Abstract The Tulula Wetlands Mitigation Bank, the first wetlands mitigation bank in the Blue Ridge Province of North Carolina, was created to compensate for losses resulting from highway projects in western North Carolina. The overall objective for the Tulula Wetlands Mitigation Bank has been to restore the functional and structural characteristics of the wetlands. Specific ecological restoration objectives of this Phase I study included: 1) reestablishing site hydrology by realigning the stream channel and filling drainage ditches; 2) recontouring the floodplain by removing spoil that resulted from creation of the golf ponds and dredging of the creek; 3) improving breeding habitat for amphibians by constructing vernal ponds; and 4) reestablishing floodplain and fen plant communities.
  • The Nikwasi Indian Mound

    The Nikwasi Indian Mound

    The Nikwasi Indian Mound The Nikwasi Indian Mound is the last remnant of a Cherokee town of the same name which once stood here on the banks of the Little Tennessee River. The Cherokee Nation towns were divided into Lower, Middle, and Over the Hill Towns. The Middle Towns, of which Nikwasi was one, were found every few miles along the Little Tennessee and its tributaries from its headwaters to the Smokies. While the mound was probably built during the earlier Mississippian Culture, it was the spiritual center of the area. A Council House, or Town House, used for councils, religious ceremonies, and general meetings, was located on top the mound, and the ever-burning sacred fire, which the Cherokee had kept burning since the beginning of their culture, was located there. Thus the mound was a most revered site. The town of Nikwasi was a "white", or peace, town. It was believed that the Nunne'hi, the spirit people, lived under this mound. When James Mooney was studying the legends of the Cherokee for the Smithsonian in 1887 - 1890, he was told the legend of these Spirit Defenders of Nikwasi by an old medicine man name Swimmer. Today it stands as a stately and silent reminder of a time, a culture, and a people of a bygone era. The mound has never been excavated for any reason, agricultural, archeological, or commercial. It stands at near its original height. One cannot truly experience the mound by merely driving by. One must stand at the base to appreciate the size and grace of Nikwasi, and try to envision a time from the past when the mound was surrounded not by busy 21st century traffic and businesses, but by fields, orchards, and a people who lived in complete harmony with the land and the river.
  • Archeology Inventory Table of Contents

    Archeology Inventory Table of Contents

    National Historic Landmarks--Archaeology Inventory Theresa E. Solury, 1999 Updated and Revised, 2003 Caridad de la Vega National Historic Landmarks-Archeology Inventory Table of Contents Review Methods and Processes Property Name ..........................................................1 Cultural Affiliation .......................................................1 Time Period .......................................................... 1-2 Property Type ...........................................................2 Significance .......................................................... 2-3 Theme ................................................................3 Restricted Address .......................................................3 Format Explanation .................................................... 3-4 Key to the Data Table ........................................................ 4-6 Data Set Alabama ...............................................................7 Alaska .............................................................. 7-9 Arizona ............................................................. 9-10 Arkansas ..............................................................10 California .............................................................11 Colorado ..............................................................11 Connecticut ........................................................ 11-12 District of Columbia ....................................................12 Florida ...........................................................
  • And Eighteenth-Century Indian Life in Kentucky Author(S): A

    And Eighteenth-Century Indian Life in Kentucky Author(S): A

    Kentucky Historical Society Dispelling the Myth: Seventeenth- and Eighteenth-Century Indian Life in Kentucky Author(s): A. Gwynn Henderson Source: The Register of the Kentucky Historical Society, Vol. 90, No. 1, "The Kentucky Image" (Bicentennial Issue), pp. 1-25 Published by: Kentucky Historical Society Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/23382492 Accessed: 25-09-2018 15:28 UTC JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at https://about.jstor.org/terms Kentucky Historical Society is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Register of the Kentucky Historical Society This content downloaded from 128.163.2.206 on Tue, 25 Sep 2018 15:28:21 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms Dispelling the Myth: Seventeenth- and Eighteenth-Century Indian Life in Kentucky by A. Gwynn Henderson Misconceptions about the people who lived in what is now the state of Kentucky before it was settled by Euro-Americans and Afro-Americans take many forms. These incorrect ideas range from the specific (how the native peoples dressed, how their houses appeared, how they made their living, what language they spoke) to the general (the diversity of their way of life, the length of their presence here, their place of origin, their spiritual beliefs, and the organization of their political and economic systems).
  • Charles Lindbergh's Contribution to Aerial Archaeology

    Charles Lindbergh's Contribution to Aerial Archaeology

    THE FATES OF ANCIENT REMAINS • SUMMER TRAVEL • SPANISH-INDIGENOUS RELIGIOUS HARMONY american archaeologySUMMER 2017 a quarterly publication of The Archaeological Conservancy Vol. 21 No. 2 Charles Lindbergh’s Contribution To Aerial Archaeology $3.95 US/$5.95 CAN summer 2017 americana quarterly publication of The Archaeological archaeology Conservancy Vol. 21 No. 2 COVER FEATURE 18 CHARLES LINDBERGH’S LITTLE-KNOWN PASSION BY TAMARA JAGER STEWART The famous aviator made important contributions to aerial archaeology. 12 COMITY IN THE CAVES BY JULIAN SMITH Sixteenth-century inscriptions found in caves on Mona Island in the Caribbean suggest that the Spanish respected the natives’ religious expressions. 26 A TOUR OF CIVIL WAR BATTLEFIELDS BY PAULA NEELY ON S These sites serve as a reminder of this crucial moment in America’s history. E SAM C LI A 35 CURING THE CURATION PROBLEM BY TOM KOPPEL The Sustainable Archaeology project in Ontario, Canada, endeavors to preserve and share the province’s cultural heritage. JAGO COOPER AND 12 41 THE FATES OF VERY ANCIENT REMAINS BY MIKE TONER Only a few sets of human remains over 8,000 years old have been discovered in America. What becomes of these remains can vary dramatically from one case to the next. 47 THE POINT-6 PROGRAM BEGINS 48 new acquisition THAT PLACE CALLED HOME OR Dahinda Meda protected Terrarium’s remarkable C E cultural resources for decades. Now the Y S Y Conservancy will continue his work. DD 26 BU 2 LAY OF THE LAND 3 LETTERS 50 FiELD NOTES 52 REVIEWS 54 EXPEDITIONS 5 EVENTS 7 IN THE NEWS COVER: In 1929, Charles and Anne Lindbergh photographed Pueblo • Humans In California 130,000 Years Ago? del Arroyo, a great house in Chaco Canyon.
  • Ten Thousand Years of Population Relationships at the Prairie

    Ten Thousand Years of Population Relationships at the Prairie

    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 5-2001 Ten Thousand Years of Population Relationships at the Prairie- Woodland Interface: Cranial Morphology in the Upper Midwest and Contiguous Areas of Manitoba and Ontario Susan Mary Myster University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss Part of the Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Myster, Susan Mary, "Ten Thousand Years of Population Relationships at the Prairie-Woodland Interface: Cranial Morphology in the Upper Midwest and Contiguous Areas of Manitoba and Ontario. " PhD diss., University of Tennessee, 2001. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/3532 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Susan Mary Myster entitled "Ten Thousand Years of Population Relationships at the Prairie-Woodland Interface: Cranial Morphology in the Upper Midwest and Contiguous Areas of Manitoba and Ontario." I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in Anthropology. Richard L. Jantz, Fred H. Smith, Major Professor We have read this dissertation and recommend its acceptance: Charles H. Faulkner, Lyle W. Konigsberg, David A. Gerard Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R.
  • Discover Illinois Archaeology

    Discover Illinois Archaeology

    Discover Illinois Archaeology ILLINOIS ASSOCIATION FOR ADVANCEMENT OF ARCHAEOLOGY ILLINOIS ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY Discover Illinois Archaeology Illinois’ rich cultural heritage began more collaborative effort by 18 archaeologists from than 12,000 years ago with the arrival of the across the state, with a major contribution by ancestors of today’s Native Americans. We learn Design Editor Kelvin Sampson. Along with sum- about them through investigations of the remains maries of each cultural period and highlights of they left behind, which range from monumental regional archaeological research, we include a earthworks with large river-valley settlements to short list of internet and print resources. A more a fragment of an ancient stone tool. After the extensive reading list can be found at the Illinois arrival of European explorers in the late 1600s, a Association for Advancement of Archaeology succession of diverse settlers added to our cul- web site www.museum.state.il.us/iaaa/DIA.pdf. tural heritage, leading to our modern urban com- We hope that by reading this summary of munities and the landscape we see today. Ar- Illinois archaeology, visiting a nearby archaeo- chaeological studies allow us to reconstruct past logical site or museum exhibit, and participating environments and ways of life, study the rela- in Illinois Archaeology Awareness Month pro- tionship between people of various cultures, and grams each September, you will become actively investigate how and why cultures rise and fall. engaged in Illinois’ diverse past and DISCOVER DISCOVER ILLINOIS ARCHAEOLOGY, ILLINOIS ARCHAEOLOGY. summarizing Illinois culture history, is truly a Alice Berkson Michael D. Wiant IIILLINOIS AAASSOCIATION FOR CONTENTS AAADVANCEMENT OF INTRODUCTION.
  • Social Scale of Mesa Verde Anasazi Kivas

    Social Scale of Mesa Verde Anasazi Kivas

    5 Social Scale of Mesa Verde Anasazi Kivas William D. Lipe Pueblo I to III Mesa Verde settlements typically have one protokiva or kiva for each block of six to nine rooms, a pattern indicative ofkiva use by a relatively small and common social segment such as an extended family or minima/lineage. These ordinary small Pueblo I protokivas and Pueblo II and III kivas were probably used for both ritual and domestic activities. Chacoan outliers in the Mesa Verde area have fewer and larger kivas, and a less regular patterning of kivas to room blocks. Kivas at Chacoan sites may have functioned at a larger scale of social integration than at Mesa Verde settlements. At roughly AD.l300, approximately coincident with the abandonment of the Mesa Verde area, most Puebloans shifted from a Mesa Verde-like pattern of many small kivas to one of large plaza-oriented sites with only a few relatively large kivas. Following Steward (1937) and Adams (this volume), this suggests a larger integrative scale for kiva use, and stronger village-level organization. Continuities in kiva architec­ ture and ritual features suggest that aspects of the religious ideology associated with earlier kivas were incorporated into the new organization. Introduction struction of large pueblos around plazas became com­ mon in the Rio Grande through Western Pueblo areas, he model for this paper is Julian Steward's classic although Steward did not discuss this (but see Adams' T 1937 article entitled "Ecological Aspects of South­ comments in Chapter 11, this volume). western Society." In that paper, Steward used the ratio Following Prudden 'sandS teward 's lead, others have of rooms to kivas as a measure of the scale of social pursued similar or related approaches to using architec­ integration in both prehistoric and historic Pueblo com­ tural characteristics and spatial relationships as indica­ munities.
  • Appalachian Studies Bibliography Cumulation 2013-June 2016 ______

    Appalachian Studies Bibliography Cumulation 2013-June 2016 ______

    Appalachian Studies Bibliography Cumulation 2013-June 2016 _____________________ CONTENTS Agriculture and Land Use ................................................................................................................3 Appalachian Studies.........................................................................................................................8 Archaeology and Physical Anthropology ......................................................................................14 Architecture, Historic Buildings, Historic Sites ............................................................................18 Arts and Crafts ..............................................................................................................................21 Biography .......................................................................................................................................27 Civil War, Military.........................................................................................................................29 Coal, Industry, Labor, Railroads, Transportation ..........................................................................37 Description and Travel, Recreation and Sports .............................................................................63 Economic Conditions, Economic Development, Economic Policy, Poverty ................................71 Education .......................................................................................................................................82
  • An Administrative History of the Midwest Archeological Center, Lincoln, Nebraska

    An Administrative History of the Midwest Archeological Center, Lincoln, Nebraska

    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Midwest Archeological Center Lincoln, Nebraska An Administrative History of the Midwest Archeological Center, Lincoln, Nebraska Report prepared by the Organization of American Historians for the National Park Service Theodore Catton, Principal Investigator Thomas Thiessen, Co-Author 2019 An Administrative History of the Midwest Archeological Center, Lincoln, Nebraska Report prepared by the Organization of American Historians for the National Park Service Theodore Catton, Principal Investigator Thomas Thiessen, Co-Author United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Midwest Archeological Center Lincoln, Nebraska 2019 PREFACE The Midwest Archeological Center (MWAC) is a field office of the National Park Service in Lincoln, Nebraska, where a staff of archeologists and support personnel conduct archeological research and conservation. The Center is dedicated to preserving, investigating, and interpreting archeological resources in the national parks in the Midwest. It also renders archeological assistance to national parks outside the Midwest as well as to other entities outside the National Park System. MWAC was formed on July 1, 1969, from the former Missouri Basin Project (MBP). The MBP was the Lincoln field office of the Smithsonian Institution’s long- running program of salvage archeology known as the River Basin Surveys (RBS). The RBS had a 23-year run from 1946 to 1969. It was aimed at salvaging the archeological record in areas that were condemned for dam and reservoir development during the era of big dam projects following World War II. Administered by the Smithsonian Institution in cooperation with the National Park Service, the RBS formed the core of the federal government’s interagency archeological salvage program through the middle decades of the twentieth century, and it holds an important place in the development of archeology in the United States.
  • Historic American Indian Tribes of Ohio 1654-1843

    Historic American Indian Tribes of Ohio 1654-1843

    Historic American Indian Tribes of Ohio 1654-1843 Ohio Historical Society www.ohiohistory.org $4.00 TABLE OF CONTENTS Historical Background 03 Trails and Settlements 03 Shelters and Dwellings 04 Clothing and Dress 07 Arts and Crafts 08 Religions 09 Medicine 10 Agriculture, Hunting, and Fishing 11 The Fur Trade 12 Five Major Tribes of Ohio 13 Adapting Each Other’s Ways 16 Removal of the American Indian 18 Ohio Historical Society Indian Sites 20 Ohio Historical Marker Sites 20 Timeline 32 Glossary 36 The Ohio Historical Society 1982 Velma Avenue Columbus, OH 43211 2 Ohio Historical Society www.ohiohistory.org Historic American Indian Tribes of Ohio HISTORICAL BACKGROUND In Ohio, the last of the prehistoric Indians, the Erie and the Fort Ancient people, were destroyed or driven away by the Iroquois about 1655. Some ethnologists believe the Shawnee descended from the Fort Ancient people. The Shawnees were wanderers, who lived in many places in the south. They became associated closely with the Delaware in Ohio and Pennsylvania. Able fighters, the Shawnees stubbornly resisted white pressures until the Treaty of Greene Ville in 1795. At the time of the arrival of the European explorers on the shores of the North American continent, the American Indians were living in a network of highly developed cultures. Each group lived in similar housing, wore similar clothing, ate similar food, and enjoyed similar tribal life. In the geographical northeastern part of North America, the principal American Indian tribes were: Abittibi, Abenaki, Algonquin, Beothuk, Cayuga, Chippewa, Delaware, Eastern Cree, Erie, Forest Potawatomi, Huron, Iroquois, Illinois, Kickapoo, Mohicans, Maliseet, Massachusetts, Menominee, Miami, Micmac, Mississauga, Mohawk, Montagnais, Munsee, Muskekowug, Nanticoke, Narragansett, Naskapi, Neutral, Nipissing, Ojibwa, Oneida, Onondaga, Ottawa, Passamaquoddy, Penobscot, Peoria, Pequot, Piankashaw, Prairie Potawatomi, Sauk-Fox, Seneca, Susquehanna, Swamp-Cree, Tuscarora, Winnebago, and Wyandot.